0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views12 pages

Teacher Performance Evaluation

The document is an individual performance commitment and review form for Alfred John D. Poyogao, a secondary school teacher. It outlines his key performance indicators, targets, actual results and scores for the 2018-2019 school year. His indicators include academic performance, drop out rates, failure rates and objectives related to lesson planning, instructional materials/ICT integration and maintaining an effective learning environment. However, based on his results and scores, he did not meet any of his targets for the review period.

Uploaded by

Angele
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
53 views12 pages

Teacher Performance Evaluation

The document is an individual performance commitment and review form for Alfred John D. Poyogao, a secondary school teacher. It outlines his key performance indicators, targets, actual results and scores for the 2018-2019 school year. His indicators include academic performance, drop out rates, failure rates and objectives related to lesson planning, instructional materials/ICT integration and maintaining an effective learning environment. However, based on his results and scores, he did not meet any of his targets for the review period.

Uploaded by

Angele
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 12

Individual Performance Commitment and Review

Form
Name of Employee : ALFRED JOHN D. POYOGAO Name of Rater:
Position :  
Secondary School Teacher I Position :

SUM-AG NATIONAL HIGH  SCHOOL


Date of Review:
School :

Rating Period : School Year 2018-2019

Equivalent Score
Highest score
that can be
claimed in each
Performance
Key Performance Indicator Target Actual Result Weight Total Score
(Refer to the attached Indicator under
(Equivalent x Weight) KRA (Refer to the
RUBRIC)
attached
RUBRIC)

5 - 85 and above
4 - 80-84.99
Achieved at least 75% average 3 - 75-79.99
Academic Performance 50% 0
grade in all classes handled 2 - 70-74.99
1 - Below 70
5 - 0 Dropout
4 - 1 to 2 Dropout
Drop Out (25% for teachers with Achieved zero (0) drop out in the 3 - 3 to 4 Droupouts 0
advisory class) advisory class. 2 - 5 to 6 Dropouts
1 - More than 6 Dropouts
5 - 0 Failure 50%
Failure (25% for teachers with 4 - 1 to 2 Failure
Achieved zero (0) failed learners 3 - 3 to 4 Failures
advisory class and 50% for non- 0
in all sections handled. 2 - 5 to 6 Failures
advisory teachers)
1 - More than 6 Failures
TOTAL: 0
Weight per Rating ( Refer to the SCORE
KRAs OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
KRA attached Rubric) ( Rating x Weight)
1. TEACHING-LEARNING PROCESS 40%
will prepare LPs compliant to the agreed format and content
submitted for checking on time.
5 - make more than 180 LPs
4- make 171 - 179 LPs
3 - make 161 - 170 LPs
will prepare daily 2- make 151 - 160 LPs
lesson plans/logs 1 - make 150 and less
1.1 Lesson Planning Lesson Plans/DLL aligned with the 20% than LPs 0
__________________________________________________
standard larning
will submit
competencies 5 - on or before deadline
4 - 1 day delayed
3 - 2 days delayed
2 - 3 days
delayed 1-
4 days
will useand aboved delayedeffectively snd efficiently:
ICT/Manipulatives
5 - Extended at least 15 classes with new
technology/manipulitives without lapses
will use effective and 4 - Extended at least 10 to 14 classes with new
1.2 Instructional efficient teaching - technology/manipulatives with one lapse
Materials/ ICT Lesson Plans/DLL, learning strategies 3 - Extended 5 to 9 classes with new technology with 2 lapses
with manipulatives or 0
Intergration/Manipulati pictures
ICT 2 - Extended 1 to 4 classes with new
ves technology/manipulativeswith 3 lapses
1 - Conducted classes without the use of
technology/manipulatives

5 - will Accomplish all


Initiated effective
Student Attendance, 4 - Lack 1
classroom
Cleaners Chart, Class
management, 3 - lack 2
1.3 Learning Rules, Updated Bulletin
discipline, 15% 0
Environment Boards (Child Friendly, 2 - Lack 3
attendance,
NDEP, etc), Schedule of 1 - Lack more than 4
orderliness and
Students
cleanliness
TOTAL: 0
Rating ( Refer SCORE
Weight per to the
KRAs OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ( Rating x
KRA attached
Rubric) Weight)
2. STUDENTS/ PUPIL OUTCOMES 30%
5 -75 and above
4 - 73.33 - 74.79
will attain at least 75% average 53 -- 071.66
failed= students
2.1 Academic (Average Grade) Grade Sheets 10% 73.32 0%
grade 4 - 1-2 failed
2 - 70.01 - 71.65
students
1 - 70 and below
3- 3-4 failed
students
2- 5-6 failed students
Quarterly Report will achieve high performance in
2.2 Failure Rate 5% 1- more 0
Summary/Gradesheets promotion rate
than 6 failed students

5 - 0 drop out
4 - 1 - 2 drop out
2.3 Drop - out Rate Form 5 will achieve zero (o) drop out 5% 3 - 3 - 4 drop out 0
2 - 5 - 6 drop out
1 - more than 6 drop out
will accomplishand submit
e-Class Record, Grade 5 – on or before deadline
will maintain 100% updated
2.3 School records Sheets, LIS Forms 1, 2,3,5, 10% 4 – 3 class days delayed 0
school records/forms.
SF 9, SF 10, 3 – 5 class days delayed
2 – 7 class days
1 – more than 7 days delayed
Total 0
PERFORMANCE Rating ( Refer to the SCORE
KRAs OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES Weight per KRA
INDICATORS attached Rubric) ( Rating x Weight)
3. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 15%
will Participate in the different
governmental and non- will Participate in:
3.1 Attendance to activities of governmental organizations:
Governmental & Non- 1. Alay Lakad 5 – More than 6 activities
Governmental Organizations 2. Independence Day 4 – 6 activities
Copy of attendance sheet/ 3. Chartered Day 5% 3 – 4 to 5 activities 0
certification/pictures 4. World Teachers' Day 2 – 3 to 4 activities
5. Division Teachers' Day 1 - 1 to 2 activities
6. General PTA
Assembly
will conduct
3.2 Parents/ Students/ Teacher 5 - more than 4 activities/
Partnership Log Books , Attendance sheets, programs/ projects
will conduct Parent-Teacher
anecdotal records, pictures,
conference, home 4 - more than 4 activities/
Minutes of the meeting, pictures
visitations, activities/ programs/ projects
programs/projects
implemented in the
7% 3 - more than 3 activities/ 0
classroom through the programs/ projects
support of external sponsors 2 - more than 2 activities/
not through collection. programs/ projects
1 - 1 activity/program/
project
5- Chair/ co-chair 2 community
projects.
3.3 School-Community Certificates, pictures, will conduct, facilitate or 4- Chair /co-chair 1 community
Relationship accomplishment reports sponsor Community project.
Outreach Program. 3- member of 2 community
3% projects. 0
2- member of a
community project
1- No
participation
TOTAL: 0
Weight per PERFORMANCE Rating ( Refer to the SCORE
KRAs OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES
KRA INDICATORS attached Rubric) ( Rating x Weight)
4. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND PERSONAL
15%
DEVELOPMENT
5 - 200 days teacher-students
contact and submit reports on time

will complete the 200 days 4 -195 to 199 days teacher-learners


teacher-students contact times, contact and submit reports with 1 or
4.1 Attendance and Punctulaity Log Book, DTR 4%
attend classes and submit 2 days delayed
reports on time 3- 190 to 194
days teacher-learners contact and
submit reports with 3 to 4 days
delayed 0
2 - 185 to 189 days
teacher-learners contact and
submit reports 5 to 6 days delayed

1 - 194 or less days teacher-


learners contact and submit reports
with 7 days or more delayed

Attendance to
Training/Seminar/LAC Session/
Forum/Symposium/Dept. Meetings:
4.2 Attendance to Deped/School- Certificate of will attend: 5 - More
Recognized Seminar/ Training/LAC Appearance/Participation/Att Training/Seminars/Conferences/ than 4 4-
Session/Forum/Symposium/ Dept. endance or Approved Forum/LAC/Dept. Meetings
3%
4 times
0
Meetings Authority to Travel (with at least 80% attendance). 3 - trice
2 - twice
1 - once
Weight per PERFORMANCE Rating ( Refer to the SCORE
KRAs OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES
KRA INDICATORS attached Rubric) ( Rating x Weight)
Co- departments' rating of will demontrate professional and 5- will Demonstrate 9-10
the professional and personal characteristics such as characteristics with 100% rating
personal characteristics decisiveness, honesty/ integrity, 4-
4.3 Professional and Personal will Demonstrate 7-8 characteristics
dedication/ commitment,
Characteristics with 80% rating 3- will
initiative/ resourcefulness,
Demonstrate 5-6 characteristics
courtesy, human relations,
3% with 60% rating. 0
leadership, stress tolerance, 2- will Demonstrate 3-4
fairness/ justice and proper characteristics with 40% rating.
attire/ good grooming. 1- will
Demonstrate 1-2 characteristic/s
with 20 % rating.

5- will attain MA Degree in field of


specialization completed within 5
years.
4- will attain MA Degree not
field of specialization completed
within 6 years.
3- will attain
CAR in the area of specilization
completed within 7 years.
Transcript of Records and
4.4 Post Graduate Studies
Certification
will attain post graduate studies 2% 2- will 0
earn 18 units and above in post
graduate studies and attained CAR
but not in the area of specialization
completed in 8 years.
1- will
earnbelow 18 units in post graduate
studies, did not attain CAR and not
in the area of specialization
completed in 9 years.
Weight per PERFORMANCE Rating ( Refer to the SCORE
KRAs OUTPUTS OBJECTIVES
KRA INDICATORS attached Rubric) ( Rating x Weight)

5- will chair 2/co chair 2/member


of 4 or more curricular/co curricular
activities and projects
will sparehead curricular and co 4- will Chair 1/co chair
curricular projects and activities 1/member of 3 curricular activities
Certificates, programs, and projects
4.5 Chairrmanship in various and other related tasks
pictures, working 3- Member 2 curricular
school related activities (Chaired, co chaired, member of 3% 0
committees activities and projects.
different committees of school 2- Member of
programs and activities) 2 curricular activity and projects.
1-
Member of 1 curricular activity and
project.

TOTAL: 0
PLUS FACTOR (Not to exceed 1 point)
Description Score
Assignments eligible for Plus Factor Point

Regular membership to a School-Level or higher Committee


such as the Grievance, SIP Planning/Project Team, SDRRM
Team, Brigada Eskwela Core Group, SGC, Child Protection, 0.2
Screening/Hiring, Inspection, Investigation, and other School
Related Committees
Chairmanship/Co-Chairmanship of a School-Level or higher .2 (Div. Level)
task-based committee .1 (Sch. Leveli)
Winner Coach/Trainer in a student competition/contest at
0.2
least Division Level `
Resource Speaker/Demonstration Teacher to a School-Level .2 (Div. Level)
or higher conferences, seminars, workshops, and the like. .1 (Sch. Leveli)

Action research/Innovations whose findings and


.2 (Div. Level)
recommendations have been adopted by the
.1 (Sch. Leveli)
Dept./School/District/Division

SUMMARY OF RATING
KRAs Weight Score
1. TEACHING-LEARNING
40% 0
PROCESS
2. STUDENTS’ OUTCOMES 30% 0

3. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 15% 0

4. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH
15% 0
AND DEVELOPMENT
Sub-Total
PLUS FACTOR 0 ADJECTIVAL RATING
GRAND TOTAL 0 POOR
I hereby certify that I fully understand what is required of me as a Teacher and
We hereby certify that the Overall Rating of the Ratee reflected herein is product of a careful appraisal of the
willingly commit to implement what have been stipulated and agreed upon in this
evidences to support each rating and a thorough deliberation between the Ratee and the Rater.
document to the best of my ability.

Ratee:
______________________________________
______________________________
Secondary School Teacher I
Secondary School Teacher I
Date: ___________________ Rater: _______________________________

Approved Department Head


by:
__________________________
WARLITO D. ROSAREAL
OIC Principal
Date: _________________

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING


4.500 - 5.000 OUTSTANDING
3.500 - 4.499 VERY SATISFACTORY
2.500 - 3.499 SATISFACTORY
1.500 - 2.499 UNSATISFACTORY
1.4000 and below POOR

You might also like