Scribd
Upload
1K views1 page

Subcon Evaluation Form

This document contains a subcontractor evaluation form for Dialog Fabricator Sdn Bhd. It evaluates the subcontractor on various criteria related to health, safety, environment, quality of work and compliance with project requirements. The subcontractor received mostly mid-range scores of 'M' or satisfactory on the mandatory criteria but lower scores of 'N' on some non-mandatory criteria like support from head office and technical ability of staff. Based on an overall rating percentage, the subcontractor's performance is noted as yellow, meaning recommended for future projects with minor concerns.

Uploaded by

Mohd Fadzle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1K views1 page

Subcon Evaluation Form

This document contains a subcontractor evaluation form for Dialog Fabricator Sdn Bhd. It evaluates the subcontractor on various criteria related to health, safety, environment, quality of work and compliance with project requirements. The subcontractor received mostly mid-range scores of 'M' or satisfactory on the mandatory criteria but lower scores of 'N' on some non-mandatory criteria like support from head office and technical ability of staff. Based on an overall rating percentage, the subcontractor's performance is noted as yellow, meaning recommended for future projects with minor concerns.

Uploaded by

Mohd Fadzle
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Form No :

SUBCONTRACTORS EVALUATION FORM FOR:


Project :

Subcontractor evaluation is summarized in table below.


The evaluation was based on the following
criteria and are assessed as :

1. Poor - 1 point 2. Satisfactory - 2 points 3. Good - 3 points

Evaluation result is denoted by :

Rating (%) Evaluation Results


70 - 100 Green - Recommended for future projects
69 - 55 Yellow - Recommended for future projects
but with minor concern.
54 & below Red - Not recommended for future projects

SUBCONTRACTOR
Dialog Fabricator Sdn Bhd

EVALUATION CRITERIA
Compliance to HSE & CIDB requirements M
Ability to meet schedule M
Effectiveness of site supervision M
Head office/Principal supports N
Technical ability of staff N
Interaction with Dialog site management N
Quality of work performed M
Knowledge of the work to be performed N
Familiarity with Project Requirement N
Availability of equipments and tools N
Willingness to cooperate N
Responsiveness to recovery plan N
House Keeping N
RATING (%)
EVALUATION RESULTS
COST EFFECTIVENESS
O =Single source 1 =Lowest bidder
2 =2nd lowest 3 =3rd lowest
Remarks:
(Please provide justification if any of the above
criteria rated poor performance - 1)

N denotes non-mandatory criteria Prepared by : __________ Date of evaluation: ________


(Site Designated Personnel)
M denotes mandatory criteria :
A poor performance in any of these Reviewed by : __________ Date: ____________
criteria would be `RED' for evaluation (Head of Contracts)
result.
Agreed by : _______________ Date: ____________
(Project Manager)
Page 1 of 1
SubconEvaluation Form

You might also like