Shankar 1
Sanjay Shankar
Ms. Jorgensen
English 10 H
04 March 2019
                                      A Formalist Standpoint
       Written by Nathaniel Hawthorne, one of the most influential authors of all time, The
Scarlet Letter vividly shows life in 17th century Boston. Throughout the novel, many themes and
aspects of daily life are discussed, and literary elements are woven in beautifully. A formalistic
approach to the Scarlet Letter would lead the reader to look meticulously at the intricacy of the
creation of the novel and its literary elements that add effect. A formalist criticism of this novel
can be analyzed in three different ways: Hawthorne’s elevated diction, his incorporating of
Puritanistic values, and the extensive use of symbolism.
       Hawthorne’s ability to use elevated diction lends itself to a formalist critique quite well.
His diction creates an impact on the reader in that it intensifies the plot. For example, at one of
the crescendos of the novel, where Hester vocalizes to Chillingworth that she must publicize her
secret, she says “So far as concerns the overthrow or preservation of his fair fame and his earthly
state, and perchance his life, he is in thy hands. Nor do I,—whom the scarlet letter has
disciplined to truth, though it be the truth of red-hot iron, entering into the soul,—nor do I
perceive such advantage in his living any longer a life of ghastly emptiness, that I shall stoop to
implore thy mercy” (Hathorne 254). This adds fuel to the fire that is the blazing willpower of
Hester Prynne to enunciate what she truly would like to say. Hawthorne’s elevated diction helps
the reader visualize that the guilt brought to Hester from the Scarlet Letter has depreciated her of
a vivacious quality of life. Formalists tend to look towards diction when perceiving how well a
                                                                                             Shankar 2
novel has been written. Hawthorne’s diction shows the deep thought put into this novel, thus
satisfying almost any formalist.
        Hawthorne weaves in Puritan beliefs to maintain the reader’s knowledge of when the
story is actually taking place, making the novel a timeless classic. For example, the townspeople
often gossiped about Hester’s adultery, saying remarks such as “What think ye, gossips? If the
hussy stood up for judgment before us five, that are now here in a knot together, would she come
off with such a sentence as the worshipful magistrates have awarded? Marry, I trow not!”
(Hawthorne 86). This shows to readers the societal obligation of Puritan society for women to
remain under the shadow of the strict patriarchal foundation of Puritanism itself. Hawthorne
juxtaposes Puritan values with those who transgress them, even adding in situational irony.
Governor Bellingham, who is practically the cult leader, preaching absolute Puritanism, is an
exemplification of hypocrisy in the time period. Although he preaches Puritanism, he lives in a
pulchritudinous mansion, which is the direct opposite of the simplistic lifestyle that is meant to
be led by the Puritans. Although he transgresses basic Puritan beliefs, even as the leader, his acts
go unnoticed. Hawthorne’s inclusion of Puritanistic life ties the whole novel together. From a
formalist point of view, the juxtaposition and the irony in that a leader’s actions go unnoticed
whereas a common lady’s actions get ridiculed upon develops the plot of the story by showing
the nadir of women’s rights in Puritan society.
        Hawthorne’s use of symbolism throughout the novel creates an everlasting impact on the
reader. For example, the most important symbol in the novel: the scarlet letter. The letter shifts
its symbolism throughout the novel. The letter represents adultery towards the beginning of the
novel. But as the novel progresses, and the magic circle around the letter forms in Chapter 21,
the letter begins to represent Hester’s isolation from the rest of society. In addition, the forest,
                                                                                          Shankar 3
where Hester and Dimmesdale have their climactic rendez-vous, serves as a symbol for the
unknowns of their future together. Another important symbol is the scaffold, which serves as a
literal “platform” for escapism, as Dimmesdale is finally able to end his suffering at the scaffold.
Formalists tend to look at literary elements that empower the plot of a novel. A very strong
literary element used throughout the novel by Hawthorne is symbolism, and any formalist would
laud Hawthorne’s use of symbolism.
        Formalist critiques tend to look to content in novels that richen the overall experience of
the novel. These can include literary elements such as juxtaposition, irony, and symbolism.
Formalists look towards the articulation of novels to gauge how well the novel is written. From a
formalist standpoint, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter has a plethora of literary
elements paired with elevated diction to immerse the reader into the novel. Hawthorne shines
light on the values of Puritanism to form a cohesion of the plot progression, leading to any
formalist’s respect towards the novel.
                                                Works Cited
        Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform,
2015.