0% found this document useful (0 votes)
280 views31 pages

Investments - Chap. 6

Summary

Uploaded by

Andrea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
280 views31 pages

Investments - Chap. 6

Summary

Uploaded by

Andrea
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

Chapter Six

Capital Allocation to Risky Assets

INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Chapter Overview

• Risk aversion and its estimation


• Two-step process of portfolio construction
• Composition of risky portfolio
• Capital allocation between risky and risk-free
assets
• Passive strategies and the capital market
line (CML)

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Risk and Risk Aversion

Speculation Gamble
• Taking considerable • Bet on an uncertain
risk for a outcome for
commensurate gain enjoyment
• Parties have • Parties assign the
heterogeneous same probabilities to
expectations the possible
outcomes

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Risk and Risk Aversion

• Utility Values
• Investors (risk-averse) are willing to consider:
• Risk-free assets
• Speculative positions with positive risk
premiums
• Portfolio attractiveness increases with
expected return and decreases with risk
• What happens when return increases with
risk?

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Table 6.1 Available Risky Portfolios

Each portfolio receives a utility score to


assess the investor’s risk/return trade off

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Risk Aversion and Utility Values

• Utility Function
• U = Utility
• E(r) = Expected return on the asset or portfolio
• A = Coefficient of risk aversion
• σ2 = Variance of returns
• ½ = A scaling factor

U = E (r ) − 1 Aσ 2
2

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Table 6.2 Utility Scores of Portfolios with
Varying Degrees of Risk Aversion

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Certainty equivalent rate
• We can interpret the utility score of risky
portfolios as a certainty equivalent rate of return
• That is the rate of return that if earned with
certainty (risk-free!) would provide the same
utility score as the risky portfolio
• If the certainty equivalent rate is lower than a
risk-free alternative, the investment is not
desirable
• A=0 risk-neutral
• A<0 risk-lover
6-‹#› INVESTMENTS
!8 | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS
Mean-variance

• Mean-Variance (M-V) Criterion


• Portfolio A dominates portfolio B if:
E (rA )≥ E (rB )
and
σA ≤σB

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Estimating Risk Aversion

• Use questionnaires
• Observe individuals’ decisions when
confronted with risk
• Observe how much people are willing to
pay to avoid risk

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Capital Allocation Across Risky 

and Risk-Free Portfolios
• Utility functions: relevant to understand investors’ preferences
• Portfolio managers can serve investors without knowing their
preferences. HOW?
• Combining risky assets with risk-free assets!
• Asset Allocation
• The choice among broad asset classes that represents a very
important part of portfolio construction
• The simplest way to control risk is to manipulate the fraction
of the portfolio invested in risk-free assets versus the portion
invested in the risky assets

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Basic Asset Allocation Example

Total market value $300,000


Risk-free money market fund $90,000

Equities $113,400
Bonds (long-term) $96,600
Total risk assets $210,000

$113,400 $96,600
WE = = 0.54 WB = = 0.46
$210,000 $210,00

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Basic Asset Allocation Example

Let
• y = Weight of the risky portfolio, P, in the
complete portfolio
• (1-y) = Weight of risk-free assets

$210,000 $90,000
y= = 0 .7 1− y = = 0.3
$300,000 $300,000

$113,400 $96,600
E: = .378 B: = .322
$300,000 $300,000

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


The Risk-Free Asset

• Only the government can issue default-free


securities
• T-bills viewed as “the” risk-free asset
• Money market funds also considered risk-
free in practice

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Portfolios of One Risky Asset and a Risk-
Free Asset

• It’s possible to create a complete portfolio


(let’s call it C) by splitting investment funds
between safe and risky assets
• Let
• y = Portion allocated to the risky portfolio, P
• (1 - y) = Portion to be invested in risk-free
asset, F

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


One Risky Asset and a Risk-Free Asset:
Example
rf = 7% σrf = 0%
E(rp) = 15% σp = 22%

• The expected return on the complete portfolio:


E (rc ) = 7 + y (15 − 7 )
• The risk of the complete portfolio:

σ C = yσ P = 22 y

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


One Risky Asset and a Risk-Free Asset:
Example

• Rearrange and substitute y = σC/σP:


σC 8
E (rC ) = rf + [
σP
]
E (rP )− rf = 7 + σ C
22

E (rP ) − rf 8
Slope = =
σP 22

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Figure 6.4 The Investment Opportunity Set

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


The investment opportunity set

• The figure graphs the investment opportunity


set:
• when y=0, the complete portfolio is F
• when y=1 the complete portfolio is P
• when 0<y<1 the portfolios will graph on the
straight line connecting point F and P
• The slope is called reward-to-volatility ratio and
measures extra return for extra risk
• The line is called Capital Allocation Line
6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS
Portfolios of One Risky Asset and a Risk-
Free Asset

• Capital allocation line with leverage


• Lend at rf = 7% and borrow at rf = 9%
• Lending range slope = 8/22 = 0.36
• Borrowing range slope = 6/22 = 0.27
• CAL kinks at P

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Figure 6.5 The Opportunity Set with 

Differential Borrowing and Lending Rates

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Risk Tolerance and Asset Allocation

• The investor must choose one optimal


portfolio, C, from the set of feasible choices
• Expected return of the complete portfolio:

[
E (rc ) = r f + y E (rp )− r f ]
• Variance:
2 2 2
σ c = y σ p

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Table 6.4 Utility Levels for 

Various Positions in Risky Assets

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Figure 6.6 Utility as a Function of 

Allocation to the Risky Asset, y

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Table 6.5 Spreadsheet Calculations 

of Indifference Curves

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Figure 6.7 Indifference Curves for 

U = .05 and U = .09 with A = 2 and A = 4

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Figure 6.8 Finding the 

Optimal Complete Portfolio

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Table 6.6 Expected Returns on Four
Indifference Curves and the CAL

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Passive Strategies: 

The Capital Market Line
• The passive strategy avoids any direct or
indirect security analysis
• Supply and demand forces may make such
a strategy a reasonable choice for many
investors
• A natural candidate for a passively held
risky asset would be a well-diversified
portfolio of common stocks such as the
S&P 500
6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS
Passive Strategies: 

The Capital Market Line

• The Capital Market Line (CML)


• Is a capital allocation line formed investment in
two passive portfolios:
1. Virtually risk-free short-term T-bills (or a
money market fund)
2. Fund of common stocks that mimics a
broad market index

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS


Passive Strategies: 

The Capital Market Line

• From 1926 to 2012, the passive risky


portfolio offered an average risk premium
of 8.1% with a standard deviation of
20.48%, resulting in a reward-to-volatility
ratio of .40

6-‹#› INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS

You might also like