Price 1998
Price 1998
Volume 48 December 1998                                                              Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1135
Price and Schmidt
transport out of the adsorbent is enhanced by a pressure-                  Finally, the system process model incorporates the
driven flow (“expulsion”); in fact, the mass transfer rates           output from these programs along with other relation-
are so high that desorption follows a quasi-equilibrium               ships to determine the overall performance characteris-
process.6 By contrast, conventional regeneration is typi-             tics of the system. These include sizing calculations for
cally rate-limited by heat and mass transfer resistance,              the adsorbent bed and other components as well as rela-
resulting in longer regeneration cycle times. This study              tions for determining pressure drop, blower requirements,
extends this body of work by addressing the technical fea-            and power consumption of the microwave generators,
sibility and identifying the most important process con-              vacuum pumps, and refrigeration system. The model also
siderations for a full-scale microwave regeneration plant:            incorporates an economic analysis to estimate the capital
adsorbent selection, column flow configuration, regen-                and operating costs of the individual equipment items
eration purge method, regeneration system pressure, and               and the total plant based on vendor quotations and cor-
final regeneration coverage.                                          relations in the literature.
                                                                           The underlying assumptions and methodology of the
OVERVIEW OF PROCESS MODELS                                            economic analysis are discussed in detail by Price.8,9 Mi-
Two VOC emission streams were chosen as the basis for                 crowave generator costs are based on quotes from two
study, typical of large-scale industrial printing operations,         industrial generator suppliers for 50-75 kW, 915 MHz units.
an important area of application. In the first case, the              Other microwave-related costs were estimated following
concentration and flow rate are representative of a plant             the procedure developed by Sanio and Schmidt.10 Oper-
in which the VOCs are emitted into and collected from                 ating costs are predicated on electric power rates of $0.059/
the building permanent total enclosure (PTE flow condi-               kWh for 5880 hr per year. In addition to the cost of elec-
tions: 144,000 cfm at 500 ppm). The second stream con-                tricity, the microwave operating costs include power tube
tains the same volume flow of VOCs, but concentrated in               replacement at $0.031/kWh. Equipment costs for the re-
a much smaller air stream (22,500 cfm at 3220 ppm); this              frigeration system, condenser, heat exchangers, vacuum
is consistent with close-capture (CC) collection at the print         pumps, adsorption columns, and other equipment are
nip. The VOC was assumed to be methyl ethyl ketone                    based on vendor quotes and correlations in the literature.
(MEK), a common industrial solvent with representative                All costs are updated to January 1995 dollars using the
dielectric and sorption properties.                                   appropriate Chemical Engineering equipment cost indices.
     Figure 1 overviews the set of process models devel-              Most of the studies discussed below focussed on the ap-
oped to predict the performance of the adsorption and                 plication of hydrophobic adsorbents such as Dowex
regeneration cycles. First, relationships are developed for           Optipore (a polymeric adsorbent produced by Dow Chemi-
the relevant dielectric, sorption, and thermodynamic                  cal) and UOP Molsiv High Silica Zeolite (MHSZ).
properties. Detailed knowledge of the sorption equilib-
rium behavior over the entire regeneration cycle is cru-              SYSTEM CONFIGURATIONS
cial to accurately estimating the heating and purge re-               The most common types of adsorption systems employ
quirements for efficient desorption. The microwave des-               fixed-beds in batch operations. Here, the adsorbent remains
orption kinetics program is predicated on experimental                stationary in the column while the bed is cycled between
observations which indicate that the column follows a                 adsorption and desorption modes. Efficient desorption re-
quasiequilibrium process.6 An adsorption kinetics program             quires two elements: heating to provide the necessary en-
has also been developed following the method of                       ergy for desorption and to lower the equilibrium capacity
Michaels7 to predict the shape and location of the break-             of the adsorbent, and purging of the desorbed VOCs to pre-
through curves and the working capacity of the bed.                   vent build up of the gas-phase concentration. For micro-
                                                                      wave regeneration, adequate purge can be achieved by ei-
                                                                      ther pulling a vacuum on the bed or flowing a purge gas
                                                                      through it. Both methods reduce the concentration of VOCs
                                                                      in the vapor-phase in the bed; for vacuum-purge regenera-
                                                                      tion the desorption effluent is a pure solvent vapor stream
                                                                      at low pressure while the stream is a mixture of inert and
                                                                      VOC at ambient pressure for gas-purge regeneration.
                                                                           Figures 2a-b show two possible solvent recovery con-
                                                                      figurations for microwave regeneration systems operating
                                                                      at low pressure. A large “dry” type (non-contaminating)
                                                                      vacuum pump is used in Figure 2a to directly pull the
Figure 1. Modeling organization for microwave regeneration studies.   vacuum on the column. The desorbed VOCs are then
1136 Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association                                                      Volume 48 December 1998
                                                                                                                  Price and Schmidt
condensed at ambient pressure with cooling water. A                    heat source, much lower stripping gas flow rates can be
precooler upstream of the vacuum pump cools the desorp-                employed for MW regeneration than in conventional
tion effluent to near-ambient temperature in order to in-              regeneration. Air is not considered a suitable stripping
crease the density and lower the operating temperature in              agent since the elevated VOC concentrations would
the pump. Figure 2b depicts a system where low pressure is             exceed the lower explosion limit. The inert gas at the
achieved by solvent condensation at low temperature. A                 outlet of the condenser is saturated with VOCs and,
small vacuum pump is required for startup and for remov-               therefore, cannot be vented directly to the environ-
ing non-condensibles. The vacuum capability of the con-                ment. It can either be sent to one of the on-line ad-
denser is limited by the temperature of the coolant; for some          sorption columns before venting or recycled back to
solvents, a small refrigeration system would be necessary.             the desorber as the purge gas stream. The first of these
The configuration decision strongly depends on the vapor               two options is not attractive for two reasons. First, the
pressure curve of the solvent. For low-boiling solvents, such          solvent content of this stream would still be relatively
as acetone (B.P. 56 °C at 1 atm), the vacuum-pump system               high and readsorbing it would entail additional des-
(Figure 2a) would be preferred, while less volatile solvents,          orption stages, and second, the inert gas (probably ni-
such as toluene (B.P. 110 °C), favor the refrigerated con-             trogen) is relatively expensive in large quantities and
denser configuration (Figure 2b).                                      must be recycled.
     For low concentration emission streams the adsorp-                     Incorporating a heat-recovery heat exchanger and
tion cycle is much longer than desorption, so there are                steam preheater reduces the microwave heating and refrig-
typically multiple columns on-line adsorbing and a single              eration requirements for the inert-purge case. The gas-gas
column being regenerated. Therefore, the desorption                    heat exchanger serves the dual purpose of cooling the des-
modes would be staggered in such a way that the micro-                 orption effluent and preheating the inert recycled back to
wave generator could be time-shared among the several                  the bed. Still, the recycled inert temperature is significantly
columns, thus maximizing its duty cycle and minimizing                 lower than the bed temperature, so a steam-preheater is
generator capital costs.                                               added to increase the temperature to about 100 °C. Both of
     An alternative method for removing the desorbed VOCs              these devices are relatively inexpensive, but as will be shown,
from the bed is to sweep them out with a flow of inert gas             they have a significant favorable impact on the operating
(Figure 2c). Because the stripping gas is not the primary              costs of the refrigeration and microwave subsystems.
Figure 2. Microwave regeneration configurations: (a) vacuum-purge MW regeneration with a non-contaminating vacuum pump with atmospheric
pressure condensation, (b) vacuum-purge MW regeneration with a refrigerated condenser and auxiliary vacuum pump, and (c) inert-purge MW
regeneration with heat recovery and steam preheating.
Volume 48 December 1998                                                                Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1137
Price and Schmidt
      There are important differences between Table 1. Comparison of performance and economics among vacuum and inert-purge microwave
                                                     regeneration systems for the PTE flow conditions (144,000 cfm at 500 ppm).
vacuum and inert purge with respect to the des-
orption thermodynamics, kinetics, and overall                                               Vacuum Purge            Inert Purge             Inert Purge
system performance. Table 1 compares the per-                                                 (Figure 2b)          With No Heat With Heat Recovery
                                                                                                                     Recovery               (Figure 2c)
formance and economics of vacuum purge re-
generation (Figure 2b) and inert-purge regenera- Adsorbent                                       Optipore             Optipore                 Optipore
tion with and without heat recovery. The PTE Adsorbate                                             MEK                  MEK                      MEK
flow conditions were assumed and the key oper- Condensation temperature (°C)                       -26                  -26                      -13
                                                     Pvoc at bed inlet (torr)                       5                     5                       12
ating variables (condensation temperature, inert P at bed outlet (torr)                             5                    45                       38
                                                        voc
flow rate, and final regeneration temperature) Nitrogen flow/VOC flow (kg/kg)                      —                     6.9                     10.6
were chosen based on separate optimization stud- Final regeneration temperature (°C)               120                  150                      150
                                                     Microwave power consumption (kW)              243                  387                      277
ies for each configuration. The levelized cost per
                                                     Recovery system power (kW)                    111                  250                      100
pound of treated solvent (COS) in Table 1 reflects Makeup nitrogen costa ($/yr)                    —                  260,000                  260,000
                                                                                 b
the total cost of ownership, including both capi- Total capital investment ($)                  3,063,000            3,333,000                3,159,000
                                                         Adsorption  subsystem     cost ($)     1,129,000            1,129,000                1,129,000
tal and operating costs, and is normalized based
                                                         Adsorbent inventory ($)                1,335,000            1,335,000                1,335,000
on the annual mass of treated solvent.                   Microwave system cost ($)               403,000              607,000                  451,000
      The results indicate that vacuum-purge of-         Recovery system cost ($)                196,000              263,000                  245,000
                                                                              c
fers substantial performance and economic ben- Total operating costs d ($/yr)                    472,000              882,000                  762,000
                                                     Levelized cost (COS) ($/lbm VOC)             0.206                0.303                    0.271
efits for MW regeneration. Most importantly, the
vacuum-purge system has a lower microwave a Makeup nitrogen costs are predicated on the fact that at the beginning of each desorption cycle, the volume
power consumption since, for a given conden- of      b
                                                         air in the column must be displaced with inert.
                                                       The total installed cost of the system.
sation temperature, there is a lower average va- c
                                                       Include all utilities, operating and maintenance costs, overhead, property taxes, insurance, and administra-
por-phase concentration in the bed. That is, the tive costs.
                                                     d
vacuum pulled by the condenser at a given con-          The levelized COS reflects the total cost of ownership, including both capital and operating costs. To
densation temperature establishes a uniform VOC calculate the levelized cost ($/lbm VOC), the capital costs are annualized using a capital recovery factor of
                                                     16.28% (10-year equipment life at a 10% interest rate) and added to the annual operating costs. This total
partial pressure in the bed at the corresponding annual cost ($/yr) then is divided by the total mass of treated solvent per year.
saturation pressure. On the other hand, if the
same condenser temperature is available for an
inert-purge system, this partial pressure is maintained only                  OPTIMAL REGENERATION PRESSURE
at the inlet; the desorbed VOCs increase the concentra-                       For vacuum-purge batch MW regeneration systems, the
tion of VOCs in the inert stream with bed height. Con-                        pressure is perhaps the most significant process variable
sequently, the sorption equilibrium curves indicate a                         since it strongly affects desorption thermodynamics and
higher final regeneration temperature and higher micro-                       kinetics as well as the size and power consumption of the
wave power consumption for the inert-purge system to                          recovery system. Lowering the pressure demands larger
achieve the same degree of regeneration. This effect is,                      vacuum pumps that consume more power. However, mi-
in fact, large enough to outweigh the effect of supple-                       crowave power consumption and generator capacity both
mental steam heating.                                                         decrease since reducing the pressure lowers the final tem-
      The cost of the adsorbent inventory, adsorption                         perature to which the bed must be heated to achieve a given
columns, and recovery system are roughly the same                             degree of reactivation. Because the system pressure affects
for the three cases. Most of the variation in capital cost                    the performance of both the desorption and solvent recov-
stems from the microwave system cost, which is pro-                           ery subsystems, the total impact can only be assessed by
portional to the power consumption. The inert-purge                           examining the total system performance and economics.
configurations also require a much larger condenser                                  Figure 3 plots the cost per unit of recovered solvent as
because of the higher film resistance caused by the                           a function of regeneration pressure for both of the vacuum-
inert. The operating costs resulting from the make-up                         purge configurations described previously. The very clear
nitrogen and the higher microwave and refrigeration                           decrease in system cost with decreasing pressures reflects
power are mostly responsible for the higher cost of re-                       the fact that mechanical vacuum pump energy is generally
covered solvent. By adding heat recovery and steam                            cheaper and has a stronger effect on desorption equilibria
preheating to the inert purge configuration, both the                         than microwave heating. This variation in system cost with
microwave generator and recovery system power con-                            pressure apparently stems entirely from the difference in
sumption are reduced substantially. The remaining                             equipment costs between microwave and vacuum produc-
studies will focus on vacuum-purge regeneration since                         tion equipment, per unit of power; the sum of the operat-
it is clearly the more attractive configuration.                              ing costs associated with the vacuum pump and microwave
1138 Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association                                                                                Volume 48 December 1998
                                                                                                                                         Price and Schmidt
System
                                0.22
                                                                      Vacuum Pump               systems exhibit distributed moving heat and mass trans-
                                                                                                fer zones. As the fronts of these zones approach and break
                                0.21                                                            through the top of the bed, an increasing portion of the
                                                                                                stream’s heat content is thrown away. Therefore, desorp-
                                 0.2
                                       0   20   40         60        80   100       120   140   tion is typically terminated soon after the leading edge of
                                                     System Pressure (torr)                     the zone breaks through the top of the bed, leaving a
                                                                                                “heel” of partially unregenerated bed. Furthermore, com-
                Figure 3. Optimal regeneration pressure level for vacuum-purge MW               plete regeneration of the bed for conventional adsorbents
                regeneration.                                                                   such as activated carbon and molecular sieves frequently
                                                                                                requires gas temperatures in excess of 250 °C, particularly
                generator power consumption does not appreciably change                         for high-boiling organics. Low-pressure steam, the most
                with pressure. Furthermore, regenerating at lower pressures                     common stripping agent, is generally not available at tem-
                implies lower final heating temperatures; this makes the                        peratures above 200 °C. This problem is compounded by
                process less likely to thermally damage the solvent.                            the fact that the heat of desorption increases sharply at
                     It appears that using a vacuum pump is slightly more                       low coverage.
                attractive than a refrigerated-condenser at all but the low-                         Experimental studies have demonstrated that it is
                est pressures for MEK. However, dry-type vacuum pumps                           much more attractive to fully regenerate the bed for
                are generally not available as single units for flow rates                      vacuum-purge microwave regeneration. First, the micro-
                exceeding 12,000 acfm, which corresponds to the given                           waves heat the entire bed volumetrically while the vacuum
                mass flow of VOC at 5 torr. The sharp increase in the sys-                      pump maintains a uniform gas pressure. Consequently,
                tem cost at 1 torr stems from the necessity of purchasing                       there are no moving heat and mass transfer zones and
                four separate vacuum pumps (cost exponent of 1) as op-                          the bed can be efficiently desorbed to completion. Fur-
                posed to simply increasing the capacity of a single pump                        thermore, high bed temperatures are readily achieved with
                (typical cost exponent of 0.45).                                                microwave heating since there is no limiting heat source
                     Figure 3 suggests that further reduction in pressure                       temperature. Finally, process conditions suggest that it
                would be cost-effective for the refrigerated condenser sys-                     may be desirable to regenerate the bed to near-comple-
                tem. However, at pressures below 1 torr the condensation                        tion in order to minimize the possibility of early break-
                temperatures become extremely low for MEK and other                             through in the subsequent adsorption cycle.
                low boiling solvents. Also, further reducing the final re-                           Figure 4 plots the microwave generator power re-
                generation temperature by lowering the pressure reduces                         quirement as a function of final coverage. As will be
                the microwave heating rate and, therefore, may eventu-                          discussed later, the microwave power consumption is
                ally shut down the microwave-enhanced mass transfer                             a strong function of the working capacity of the ad-
                effects and the quasi-equilibrium process observed in the                       sorbent; regenerating the adsorbent more fully (lower
                experimental studies. For example, a 1 torr regeneration                        coverage) increases the desorption efficiency by put-
                pressure corresponds to a final heating temperature of only                     ting more energy into the desorption phase change
                90 °C. Therefore, the optimal pressure for vacuum-purge                         and less into the sensible heat of the bed. The results
                microwave regeneration is probably in the 1–5 torr range                        shown in Figure 4 correspond to the PTE case flow
                for MEK. While these results were for MEK on Dowex                              conditions, but the same trends are seen for other flow
                Optipore at the PTE flow conditions, the same trends have                       conditions. Note that while the lower pressure curves
                been observed in calculations for the MHSZ adsorbent and                        reflect lower microwave power requirements, the power
                with other solvents under different flow conditions.                            consumption of the vacuum pump and/or refrigera-
                                                                                                tion system are correspondingly higher. Thus, opera-
                OPTIMAL FINAL REGENERATION COVERAGE                                             tional and process considerations suggest that the
                Once the regeneration pressure has been selected, the                           Dowex Optipore and MHSZ adsorbents should be re-
                degree to which the adsorbent is regenerated depends only                       generated to near-zero coverage. Consequently, a low
                on the final heating temperature. Because of the high unit-                     enough pressure should be chosen so that the corre-
                cost of microwave energy relative to conventional energy                        sponding final regeneration temperature does not ex-
                sources (e.g., steam), this selection strongly affects the                      ceed the temperature limit of the adsorbent.
        Volume 48 December 1998                                                                               Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1139
                          Price and Schmidt
                                                                          150 torr
                                    800                                                                 ambient air) it is necessary to either choose hydrophobic
                                                                                         25 torr        adsorbents or make provisions for dehydrating the stream;
                                    600                                                                 excessive water adsorption hampers performance by rap-
                                                                                         10 torr        idly depleting the adsorbent’s capacity, wasting regenera-
                                    400
                                                                                                        tion energy to desorb the water, and producing a recov-
                                                                                                        ered solvent with a high water content. The Dowex
                                    200
                                                                                                        Optipore and MHSZ adsorbents exhibit excellent hydro-
                                      0                                                                 phobicity— only adsorbing water at high relative humidi-
                                          0       2        4         6               8             10   ties. Activated carbon is moderately hydrophobic, but
                                                            Coverage
                                                      (g MEK/100 g adsorbent)                           exhibits a dramatic increase in its affinity for water at rela-
                                                                                                        tive humidities over 50%. Molecular sieve 13X is hydro-
                          Figure 4. Optimal final regeneration coverage for vacuum-purge                philic and only applicable for dry gas streams or in pro-
                          regeneration at different regeneration pressures.
                                                                                                        cesses where the moisture has been removed upstream
                                                                                                        using, for example, a rotary desiccant wheel.
                          ADSORBENT SELECTION                                                                 Tables 2 and 3 also list the equilibrium sorptive capaci-
                          Choosing an appropriate adsorbent is one of the most                          ties for MEK at low and high VOC concentrations, respec-
                          important process decisions for VOC recovery systems,                         tively. Dowex Optipore and activated carbon both exhibit
                          either conventional or microwave-regenerated. In many                         relatively high sorptive capacities for MEK— about twice
                          ways, it dictates the performance of both adsorption and                      that of MHSZ and MS 13X. The actual capacity of the bed,
                          desorption cycles. This study considers four adsorbents                       however, depends in part on the sharpness of the isotherm
                          commonly employed for adsorbing volatile organic com-                         and the adsorbent’s kinetic performance. Dynamic adsorp-
                          pounds from waste air streams: Dowex Optipore 11,12 (a                        tion occurs in a mass transfer zone with a finite length.
                          hydrophobic, polymeric adsorbent produced by Dow                              When the leading edge reaches the top of the bed, the col-
                          Chemical), UOP hydrophobic Molsiv High Silica Zeolite                         umn must be regenerated despite the fact that much of the
                          (MHSZ),13,14 Calgon BPL activated carbon,15 and Grace/                        capacity of the adsorbent in the mass transfer zone is not
                          Davison molecular sieve 13x.16                                                utilized. Dowex Optipore and MHSZ exhibit much better
                                Tables 2 and 3 list some of the properties and perfor-                  kinetic performance (i.e., very steep isotherms and high
                          mance of these four adsorbents operating in low and high                      mass transfer rates) and therefore a shorter mass transfer
                          VOC (MEK) concentration air streams, respectively. These                      zone than the molecular sieve and activated carbon
                          cases studies were conducted for vacuum-purge microwave                       adsorbents. The values for the equilibrium sorptive capaci-
                          regeneration at a pressure of 25 torr in order to corre-                      ties in these tables correspond to a low humidity environ-
                          spond with the available lab data for the different                           ment (i.e., less than 40% relative humidity).
                          adsorbents.6 Although unit costs of the MHSZ and Dowex                              The other factor that dictates the working capacity of
                          Optipore adsorbents are considerably higher than the                          the adsorbent is the regenerability. While the Dowex
                          molecular sieve and activated carbon, a more relevant                         Optipore and MHSZ may be easily regenerated to comple-
                          number is the cost per unit of adsorbed VOC, which takes                      tion, much higher temperatures are required to completely
                          into account the sorptive capacity. The high cost of the                      desorb polar solvents from activated carbon and molecular
                          Dowex Optipore polymeric adsorbent is, in part, balanced                      sieves. In practice, it is not economical to completely re-
                          by the fact that its resilience is expected to give it a longer               generate these adsorbents. Thus, the actual “working ca-
                          lifetime than the three years typical of the other adsorbents                 pacity” of the adsorbent is diminished considerably from
                          in VOC removal service.11,13,17                                               the theoretical equilibrium capacities listed in Tables 2 and
                                The relative performance of each of these adsorbents                    3. Activated carbon, for example, typically has a working
                          from the sorption, process, and dielectric heating perspec-                   capacity of about half of its equilibrium capacity.18
                          tives is discussed below. Because the adsorbent affects the
                          performance of virtually every plant component, the true                                       Process Considerations
                          effect can be gleaned only by examining the total system                      One of the largest operating costs stems from the power
                          performance and economics.                                                    requirements of the system fans. While increasing the
                                                                                                        adsorbent particle size reduces the pressure drop across
                                         Sorption Considerations                                        the bed, it also increases the mass transfer resistance and,
                          First, the adsorbent must possess the selectivity to adsorb                   therefore, reduces the working capacity of the adsorbent.
                          the VOC(s) of interest while allowing environmentally                         Table 2 lists the pressure drop for each of the adsorbents.
                          1140 Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association                                                               Volume 48 December 1998
                                                                                                                                  Price and Schmidt
The average particle size used in this analy-        Table 2. Effect of adsorbent selection for the PTE flow conditions (144,000 cfm @ 500 ppm). a,b
sis is 1.5 mm for the Dowex Optipore and 3
                                                                                                    Dowex                           Activated       Molecular
mm for the others. In this study, a bed depth                                                      Optipore         MHSZ             Carbon         Sieve 13X
of 1 ft was used for the Dowex Optipore and
                                                     Adsorbent unit cost ($/lbm adsorbent)          25.00             7.10             2.50               2.50
MHSZ adsorbents because of the high unit
                                                     Specific adsorbent cost ($/lbm MEK)             192              101               17                 36
cost and short length of the mass transfer           Equil. coverage (g MEK/g adsorbent)             0.13             0.07             0.15               0.07
zone; a bed depth of 1.5 ft was more suit-           Pressure drop/ft of bed (in. H2O/ft)            12.2              5.0              4.1                8.7
able for the other two adsorbents because            System fan power (kW)                           343              140              171                366
                                                     Specific heat (kJ/kg K)                         1.26             0.84             1.05               1.00
of their lower unit cost and larger mass trans-      Heat of desorption (kJ/kg)                      576              662              752                814
fer zone. As shown in the tables, the system         Final regen. temp. (°C) (coverage)           150 (0.00)       193 (0.01)       360 (0.05)         350 (0.01)
fan power is directly proportional to the            Specific microwave heat (kJ/kg MEK)            2,071            3,276            6,139              8,575
                                                     Microwave generator power (kW)                  298              537             1,038              1,840
pressure drop and air flow rate.
                                                     Total capital investment ($)                 3,039,000        2,549,000        3,015,000          4,268,000
      The variation in system fan power is           Annual operating costs ($/yr)                 477,000          718,000          936,000           1,459,000
rather small compared to the variation in            Levelized cost, COS ($/lbm VOC)                0.207            0.223            0.295              0.445
microwave power with adsorbent selection.            a
                                                       These parameters are based on the available sorption isotherms from the adsorbent manufactures, microwave
All of the microwave heating essentially             regeneration experimental data, and the sorption equilibria models.
                                                     b
ends up in two places: sensible heat of the            The process flow diagram for these systems is shown in Figure 2b.
bed (and VOC) and latent heat of desorp-
tion. The bed and VOC sensible heat is basi-         Table 3. Effect of adsorbent selection for the CC flow conditions (22,500 cfm @ 3,220 ppm).a
cally “wasted” energy; it must eventually be
removed in the bed cooling step prior to                                                            Dowex                           Activated       Molecular
                                                                                                   Optipore          MHSZ            Carbon         Sieve 13X
adsorption and by the cooling water in the
condenser. The microwave power consump-              Specific adsorbent cost ($/lbm MEK)             104               55               11                19
tion is a complex function of several vari-          Equil. coverage (g MEK/g adsorbent)             0.24             0.13             0.22              0.13
                                                     System fan power (kW)                            39               14               20                42
ables:
                                                     Specific microwave heat req.
                                                       (kJ/kg MEK)                                   1,483           2,133            4,117              4,927
     (1) Adsorbent/VOC Heat Capacity. For            Microwave generator power (kW)                   197      302       620        804
         a given final regeneration tempera-         Total capital investment ($)                 1,321,000 1,197,000 1,578,000  1,878,000
                                                     Annual operating costs ($/yr)                  239,000  357,000   535,000    666,000
         ture, adsorbents with large specific        Levelized cost, COS ($/lbm VOC)                 0.097    0.116     0.166      0.202
         heats require more microwave
                                                 a
         power.                                    Identical information from Table 2 is not repeated.
     (2) Final Regeneration Temperature.
         The microwave power and system economics                                        at 500 ppm the molecular sieve requires 8575 kJ
         depend strongly on the temperature to which the                                 of microwave heating per kg of desorbed MEK
         adsorbent must be heated to achieve the desired                                 compared to only 4927 kJ/kg at 3220 ppm.
         degree of regeneration for the given vacuum con-                         The Dowex Optipore adsorbent has all of these factors
         ditions. When comparing different adsorbents,                      working in its favor. Its high equilibrium capacity and small
         it is crucial to employ the optimal final regen-                   mass transfer zone give it the largest working capacity of
         eration coverage.                                                  the four adsorbents. It also has the lowest heat of desorp-
     (3) Heat of Desorption. Roughly half of the micro-                     tion and final regeneration temperature. These factors com-
         wave heating is consumed by the latent heat of                     bine to give it the lowest specific microwave heating re-
         desorption. Table 2 indicates that there is signifi-               quirement. The MHSZ, while having a low equilibrium
         cant variation in this value among the four                        capacity, has a moderately high working capacity because
         adsorbents.                                                        of its sharp isotherms; it also has low heat of desorption,
     (4) Working Capacity. The lower the adsorbent work-                    heat capacity, and final regeneration temperature. The
         ing capacity, the higher the ratio of bed sensible                 carbon adsorbent has a moderate working capacity, but
         heat to latent heat of desorption. That is, more                   requires high regeneration temperatures and has a high
         adsorbent must be heated up to desorb the same                     heat of desorption. Molecular sieve 13X has all of these
         amount of VOC. The effect of the working ca-                       factors working against it: low working capacity and high
         pacity alone can be examined by comparing the                      heat of desorption, specific heat, and final regeneration
         specific microwave heating requirement for a                       temperature. As a result, six times more microwave heat-
         given adsorbent between the high and low VOC                       ing is required than for Dowex Optipore.
         concentration cases (Tables 2 and 3). For example,                       Tables 2 and 3 also summarize overall system
Volume 48 December 1998                                                                           Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1141
Price and Schmidt
economic parameters for the prototypical fixed-bed sys-                             heating takes place in this area. Thus, heating non-unifor-
tems. As shown, the economics are very sensitive to the                             mities are, to some degree, self-correcting in a manner analo-
microwave generator capacity, so the Dowex Optipore,                                gous to “moisture leveling” in drying applications. Table 4 il-
while 10 times more expensive (per unit), yields the most                           lustrates the variation in loss-factor and penetration depth
cost-effective system. The effect of VOC concentration in                           among adsorbents for MEK adsorption.
the feed stream can be seen by comparing the results from                                Finally, the selection of an adsorbent may also be in-
Table 3 with that from Table 2. While the performance is,                           fluenced by the dielectric properties of the solvent. For
in general, better for the CC case because of the higher                            example, if a very low loss-factor solvent is to be regener-
sorptive capacities, the same trends appear.                                        ated, an adsorbent with a high loss-factor might need to
     Process safety considerations may also restrict the use                        be chosen in order to achieve reasonable bed heat-up rates.
of certain adsorbent/VOC combinations. For example, ke-                             In short, while the polymeric and high-silica adsorbents
tones, aldehydes, and organic acids can react exothermi-                            are considerably more expensive, they exhibit superior
cally on activated carbon adsorbents, possibly leading to                           sorptive performance and their dielectric properties make
bed fires. Finally, if microwave heating non-uniformities                           them more suitable for microwave heating.
occur, it may be possible to mix these out by intermittently
fluidizing the bed during the desorption cycle. Dowex                               COLUMN CONFIGURATION
Optipore’s resilience and resistance to attrition make it par-                      The configuration of the adsorption column for fixed-bed
ticularly attractive if such a scheme is employed.                                  systems represents the heart of the design problem since
                                                                                    it must satisfy both sorption and electromagnetic con-
                Dielectric Considerations                                           straints. Figure 5 illustrates the electromagnetic and gas
The property that describes how well a material absorbs                             flow regimes for three possible column configurations:
microwave energy and converts it into heat is the dielec-                           axial-flow columns, horizontal columns with an internal
tric loss factor (ε”). In general, the heat-up rate of a mate-                      rectangular bed, and radial-flow columns. For axial or
rial in an applied electric field is proportional to the di-                        horizontal-bed configurations, the feed stream is usually
electric loss factor, frequency, and the square of the                              directed downward through the bed during adsorption
strength of the electric field inside the material. The pen-                        in order to prevent fluidization of the adsorbent particles
etration depth (δ), defined as the distance from the sur-                           at the high velocities typical of adsorption. Counter-cur-
face of the bed at which the power decays to 1/e of its                             rent flow during regeneration (upward) prevents
value at the surface, is inversely proportional to the di-                          readsorption in the unsaturated bottom portion of the
electric loss factor20                                                              bed.21 In radial-flow columns, the adsorbent is held in
                                    λ0 ε'                                           the annular space between the two cylinders. The follow-
                             δ=                                       (1)           ing discusses some of the important design considerations
                                     2πε"                                           for column selection.
1142 Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association                                                                              Volume 48 December 1998
                                                                                                           Price and Schmidt
and horizontal-bed columns both exhibit excellent flow           The bed area perpendicular to the flow is the air flow rate
uniformity, but there are several potential sources for flow     divided by the superficial velocity through the column.
maldistribution in radial flow columns:22-24                     Pressure drop and residence time constraints limit the
    (1) Flow Bypass. Some empty space must be left in            superficial velocity to 75–100 ft/min while transportation
         the top of the column to provide for backwashing        limitations restrict column sizes to about 12 ft in diam-
         and adsorbent swelling. The feed stream may             eter and 30 ft in length.18 A 144,000 cfm VOC emission
         tend to bypass the bed and flow through this            stream (PTE conditions) at a superficial velocity of 85 ft/
         empty space, resulting in poor bed utilization or       min would require a total of 6 horizontal-bed columns,
         early breakthrough.                                     17 axial-flow columns, or 9 radial-flow columns. Thus,
    (2) Channeling. Flow may tend to favor either the            for large flow rate systems such as those considered in
         top or the bottom of the bed if the pressure gra-       this study, horizontal-bed columns are usually recom-
         dient across the bed is not uniform. It is relatively   mended.17,25 The number of required columns is impor-
         difficult to achieve a uniform pressure gradient in     tant not only because of the large capital cost per column,
         radial-flow columns because the finer adsorbent         but also because of the added cost of associated microwave
         particles settle toward the bottom, resulting in a      delivery components (waveguide, applicator, etc.).
         higher packing density (lower permeability).                 While radial-flow columns have been applied exten-
    (3) Fluidization. Typical adsorption velocities are on       sively for applications such as methanol synthesis, cata-
         the order of the minimum fluidization velocity          lytic reforming, desulfurization, and catalytic mufflers,
         for smaller adsorbent particles. For radial-flow        they have not been particularly successful for adsorption
         columns, the velocity is even higher at the inner       applications. Kovach states that annular beds have been
         annulus. Fluidization is avoided with axial and         designed but have seen only limited use because of high
         horizontal-bed columns by directing the flow            attrition losses.25 They also have more severe structural
         downward through the bed.                               problems due to the increased stress acting on the adsor-
    (4) Bed Swelling. As the bed rises due to swelling,          bent which settles to the lower end of the column while
         the top of the bed will move relative to the loca-      the bed expands and contracts in successive adsorption/
         tion of the top row of flow holes on the inner          desorption cycles. Because of the large air flow rates, the
         annulus. This will result in poor utilization of        inner annulus will have to be about 2 ft for a bed flow
         the top layers of the bed.                              rate of 12,000 scfm.
Volume 48 December 1998                                                         Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1143
Price and Schmidt
attractive from the operational viewpoint Table 5. Optimal plant configuration and operating variables for fixed-bed, vacuum-purge microwave regener-
because they are hydrophobic and com- ated adsorption system (Figure 2a) under both PTE and CC flow conditions.
pletely non-reactive. Carbon is moderately
hydrophobic but impurities within it can                                                    PTE Flow                               CC Flow
                                                                                   144,000 cfm, 500 ppm                   22,500 cfm, 3,220 ppm
catalyze exothermic reactions with ke-
tones. Molecular sieves are hydrophilic
                                                                                     Dowex              MHSZ               Dowex              MHSZ
and, therefore, not suitable for this appli-
                                                                                   Optipore                               Optipore
cation. The polymeric and high-silica
adsorbents also possess relatively low di- Purge method                              Vacuum            Vacuum              Vacuum            Vacuum
electric loss-factors which implies longer Regeneration pressure (torr)                  5                  5                   5                 5
microwave penetration depths and there- Final regeneration coverage                   0.00               0.00                0.00              0.00
fore more uniform heating.                   Final regeneration temp. (°C)             120                150                 120               150
     Large air flow systems favor horizon- Column configuration                    Horiz. bed         Horiz. bed          Horiz. bed        Horiz. bed
tal-bed columns beds since they present a Total number of columns                        6                  6                   2                 2
larger cross-sectional area and, therefore,  Bed height (ft)                             1                  1                   1                 1
fewer columns are necessary. This reduces    Bed superficial velocity (ft/min)          85                 85                  85                85
                                             Pressure drop (“H2O)                      12.2                 5                 8.8               3.3
the system complexity and lowers the
                                             Cycle times: ads/reg/cool (hr)       6.4/1.1/0.13      4.7/0.7/0.13         2.4/2.1/0.16      1.7/1.5/0.17
capital and installation costs of not only
                                             Microwave generator capacity (kW)         243                368                 168               235
the columns and gas piping, but also the
                                             Microwave power consumption (kW) 254                         355                 189               252
microwave power delivery components. System fan power (kW)                             343                140                  39                14
Both horizontal-bed and axial columns are Vacuum pump power (kW)                        80                 80                  74                78
commonly manufactured and exhibit Vacuum pump capacity (scfm)                        13,000             13,000              13,000            13,000
good flow distribution. Axial-flow col- Total capital investment ($)               3,099,000          2,450,000           1,408,000         1,230,000
umns would be applicable for smaller air       Adsorption subsystem costa              36%               45%                 34%               39%
flow systems (<20,000 cfm) because they        Adsorbent inventory cost                43%               20%                 32%               14%
are easier to fabricate and implement. Ra-     Microwave subsystem costsb             13%                24%                 15%               29%
                                                                           c
dial-flow columns are less common and          Recovery  subsystem   costs             7%                10%                 16%               19%
                                                                  d
suffer from flow maldistribution problems. Total operating costs ($/yr)              462,000           639,000             238,000           331,000
                                             Levelized cost, COS ($/lbm)              0.206              0.221               0.099             0.113
     In addition to adequate heating, effi-
cient desorption requires that the VOCs a
                                              Includes the cost of the vessels, instrumentation, fans, recovery tank, condenser, decanter, and internal piping.
be quickly removed from the gas space in
                                             Does not include adsorbent inventory.
the bed. It was found that microwave re- b Includes cost of microwave generator, power measurement and control, applicator, and waveguides.
generation of fixed beds favors vacuum c Includes cost of the vacuum pump (condenser and other costs are included with adsorption system costs).
purge rather than flowing an inert stream d Includes cost of cooling water, electricity, microwave power tube replacement, adsorbent replacement, mainte-
through the bed because of lower micro- nance, overhead, property taxes, and insurance.
wave and refrigeration costs. For vacuum-
purge systems, a regeneration pressure of about 5 torr pro-                Environmental Solutions Program. Adsorbent samples and
vides the optimal balance between the cost of the micro-                   technical information were provided by Dow Chemical
wave and vacuum equipment. Either a dry vacuum pump                        Company and UOP Molecular Sieves. The authors would
or a refrigerated condenser may be employed as the                         like to thank Dr. H. Robert Goltz of Dow Chemical for
vacuum source. In contrast with conventional regenera-                     reviewing a draft of this paper.
tion systems, the adsorbent bed should be regenerated to
near-zero coverage.                                                        NOMENCLATURE
                                                                           COS Levelized cost per pound of
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS                                                                     treated solvent                                               [$/lbm]
This project has been funded in part with Funds from the                   LMTZ Length of the mass transfer zone                                        [m]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of                      PPM Parts per million gas concentration                                      [—]
the program of the Gulf Coast Hazardous Substance Re-                      q         Sorption coverage                                              [wt. %]
search Center. The contents do not necessarily reflect the                 T         Temperature                                                        [°C]
views and policies of the EPA nor does the mention of                      v         Velocity                                                         [m/s]
trade names or commercial product constitute endorse-                      δ         Depth of microwave penetration                                     [m]
ment or recommendation for use. Additional grants were                     ε’        Dielectric constant                                                [—]
provided by Borden, Inc., and the University of Texas
1144 Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association                                                                             Volume 48 December 1998
                                                                                                                                  Price and Schmidt
ε”        Dielectric loss factor                                         [—]       17. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Handbook: Control Technolo-
                                                                                       gies for Hazardous Air Pollutants, June 1991, EPA/625/6-91/014.
λ0        Wavelength of microwave radiation                                        18. Vatavuk, W.M. Estimating Costs of Air Pollution Control; Lewis Publish-
                                                                                       ers/CRC Press: Chelsea, MI, 1990.
          in free space                                                  [m]       19. Roy, P.; Schmidt, P.S. Dielectric Loss Factors of Industrial Adsorbents
                                                                                       Loaded with Volatile Organic Compounds. In Proceedings of the 30th
                                                                                       International Microwave Symposium; International Microwave Power
REFERENCES                                                                             Institute: Denver, CO, July, 1995.
1.    Burkholder, H.R.; Fanslow, G.E.; Bluhm, D.D. “Recovery of ethanol            20. Metaxas, A.C.; Meredith, R.J. Industrial Microwave Heating; Peter
      from a molecular sieve by using dielectric heating,” Ind. Eng. Chem.             Peregrinus: London, 1983.
      Fund. 1986, 25, 414-416.                                                     21. Ruthven, D.M. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes; John
2.    Singh, V.P. Microwave Regeneration of Molecular Sieves. Canadian Fu-             Wiley & Sons: New York, 1984.
      sion Fuels Technology 1984; Report No. F84023.                               22. Genkin, V.S.; Dil’man, V.V.; Sergeev, S.P. “The Distribution of a Gas
3.    Roussy, G.; Zoulalian, A.; Charreyre, M.; Thiebaut, J.M. “How micro-             Stream Over the Height of a Catalyst Bed in a Radial Contact Appara-
      waves dehydrate zeolites,” J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 5702-8.                      tus,” Int. Chem. Eng. 1973, 13, 24-28.
4.    Gibson, C.; Matthews, I.; Samuel, A. “Microwave enhanced diffusion           23. Ponzi, P.R.; Kaye, L.A. “Effect of Flow Maldistribution on Conversion
      in polymeric materials,” Microwave Power and Electromagnetic Energy              and Selectivity in Radial Flow Fixed-Bed Reactors, AIChE J. 1979, 25,
      1988, 23 (1), 17-28.                                                             100-108.
5.    Weissenberger, A.P.; Schmidt, P.S. Microwave Regeneration of                 24. Chang, H.S.; Calo, J.M. “Design Criterion for Radial flow Fixed-Bed
      Adsorbents. In Proceedings of Fourth Biennial Symposium on Microwave             Reactors, AIChE J. 1983, 29, 1039-1041.
      Processing of Materials; Materials Research Society: San Francisco, April    25. Kovach, J.L. Gas-Phase Adsorption. In Handbook of Separation Tech-
      1994.                                                                            niques for Chemical Engineers; Schweitzer, P.A. Ed.; McGraw-Hill: New
6.    Price, D.W.; Schmidt, P.S. “Microwave Regeneration of Adsorbents at              York, 1979, p. 3-39.
      Low Pressure: Experimental Kinetics Studies,” J. Microwave Power and
      Electromagnetic Energy 1997, 32 (3), 145-154.
7.    Michaels, A.S. “Simplified Method of Interpreting Kinetic Data in
      Fixed-Bed Ion Exchange,” Ind. Eng. Chem. 1952, 44 (8), 1922.
8.    Price, D.W. Recovery of Volatile Organic Compounds by Microwave
      Regeneration of Adsorbents, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas
      at Austin, 1996.
9.    Price, D.W.; Schmidt, P.S. Design Analysis of Microwave-Regenerated
      Adsorbent Systems for Recovery of Volatile Organic Compounds. In
      Proceedings of the Microwave and High-Frequency Heating Conference,
      Cambridge, UK, September 1995; pp. C4.1-4.
10.   Sanio, M.R.; Schmidt, P.S. Cost Estimation for Industrial Dielectric Heat-
      ing Systems, Process Energetics Program Report 89-01, Center for En-
      ergy Studies, Univeristy of Texas at Austin. 1989.
11.   Goltz, H.R. Dow Chemical, Liquid Separation Systems, personal com-
      munication, 1994-96.                                                             About the Authors
12.   Goltz, H.R.; Jones, K.; Tegen, M. High Surface Area Polymeric
      Adsorbents for VOC Capture and On-Site Regeneration. Presented at                Dr. David W. Price is a post-doctoral research associate and
      the Air & Waste Management Association 87th Annual Meeting &                     Dr. Philip S. Schmidt (corresponding author) is the Donald J.
      Exhibition, Cincinnati, OH, June 19-24, 1994, 94-TA42.04.
                                                                                       Douglass Professor of Engineering and Head of the Pro-
13.   Southworth, J. UOP Molecular Sieves, personal communications,
      1993-1995.                                                                       cess Energetics Program at the University of Texas at Aus-
14.   UOP “Molsiv™ High Silica Zeolites: Product Information,” Des Plaines,            tin, Center for Energy and Environmental Resources, Aus-
      IL, 1993.
15.   Xtrusorb™ 600 and 700 Pelletized Activated Carbons. Calgon Car-                  tin, TX 78712. Dr. Schmidt is the author of two books and
      bon Corporation, Technical Bulletin, 1993.                                       numerous journal articles on industrial thermal process de-
16.   Davison Molecular Sieves Adsorption Equilibria. Davison Chemical                 sign and dielectric heating of materials.
      Division, W.R. Grace & Co., Technical Bulletin, 1994.
Volume 48 December 1998 Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 1145