Energy Efficiency in Hospitals
Energy Efficiency in Hospitals
net/publication/312069570
CITATIONS READS
0 157
3 authors:
Kasım Zor
Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University
16 PUBLICATIONS 32 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Investigation of High Efficient AC-DC Power Factor Corrected Converters for On-Board Battery Charging System In Electric Vehicles View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Kasım Zor on 05 January 2017.
Abstract
The increasing demand for energy and the depletion of existing fossil fuel based resources have forced
the countries to realize the efficient use of energy, energy saving applications and searching alternative
energy sources. Using the energy efficiently and performing energy saving studies have great importance
for developing countries like ours that are dependent on other countries to meet their energy needs.
Hospitals generally consume 6% of total energy in the buildings. Heating, Ventilation and Air
Conditioning (HVAC) systems are the significant part of electrical energy consumption at the hospitals.
The air-conditioning system is responsible for around 70% of total electricity consumption. Electric
motors and lighting systems in a hospital represent approximately 19-21% of the total energy
consumption. In this study, according to the detailed analysis on the lighting devices, electric motors and
HVAC systems, the energy saving potentials and payback periods of these systems are estimated for a
University Hospital.
Artan enerji talebi ve mevcut fosil yakıt tabanlı kaynaklarının hızla tükenmesi, ülkelerin enerjiyi verimli
kullanmasına, enerji tasarrufu yapmasına ve alternatif enerji kaynaklarını aramasına zorlamıştır. Enerji
ihtiyaçlarını karşılamada başka ülkelere bağımlı olan bizim gibi gelişmekte olan ülkelerde, mevcut
enerjiyi verimli kullanmak ve tasarruf çalışmaları yapmak daha büyük önem taşımaktadır. Hastaneler
binalarda kullanılan toplam enerjinin yaklaşık olarak %6’sını tüketmektedir. Isıtma, Havalandırma ve
İklimlendirme sistemleri (IHİS), hastanede tüketilen elektrik enerjisinin büyük bir kısmını
oluşturmaktadır. İklimlendirme sistemleri toplam tüketilen yaklaşık olarak %70’inden sorumludur.
Hastanedeki elektrik motorları ve aydınlatma sistemleri yaklaşık olarak toplam enerjinin %19-21‘lik
kısmını harcamaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada, aydınlatma cihazları, elektrik motorları ve IHİS sistemleri
üzerine yapılan detaylı çalışmalar sonucunda, bir üniversite hastanesinde bu cihazların enerji tasarruf
potansiyelleri ve geri dönüşüm süreleri tahmin edilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Üniversite hastanesi, Enerji verimliliği, Enerji tasarrufu, Enerji yönetimi.
*
Yazışmaların yapılacağı yazar: Ahmet TEKE, Ç.Ü., Mühendislik Fakültesi, Elektrik-Elektronik
Mühendisliği Bölümü, Adana. ahmetteke@cu.edu.tr
luminance lamps (mercury vapor or metal halide The saving kWh in a year can be calculated as
lamps) are used for environmental and road 13,908 and saving TL can be calculated 4,451 TL.
lighting. These lamps are consumed electric Installed cost of new armature and lamps labor
energy more than new lamps led or compact included price are 40x110=4,400 TL. As a result,
fluorescent. Most of the lamps used for interior payback period can be calculated 0.99 year.
lighting of hospital are CFLs with magnetic
ballast. CFLs with electronic ballast should be Replacement mercury lamps with the CFL
preferred instead of old type magnetic ballast. and LED: In the hospital, the total installed
capacity of mercury lamps for exterior lighting is
2.1.1. Exterior Lighting at University Hospital approximately 5 kW at the back side of the
parking. Table 3 shows the total energy savings in
The lamps used for the exterior lighting at a year when the 250W mercury lamps are replaced
University Hospital are as shown in Table 1. with 45 W CFL lamps. Mercury lamps have 10%
ballast losses and CFL lamps have 8% electronic
Table 1. Exterior lighting at University Hospital ballast losses. The running time of exterior lighting
lamps is 11 hours in a day. According to peak and
Metal halide
Fluorescent
Mercury
Mercury
(125 W)
(250 W)
(750W)
(18W)
vapor
Savings/year (TL)
consumption (W)
Investment cost
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
Savings/year
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
Energy
(kWh)
(year)
(TL)
Lamp type
Investment cost
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
Savings/year
Savings/year
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
Energy
(kWh)
(year)
(TL)
(TL)
Lamp type
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
consumption
Savings/year
Savings/year
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
Energy
(kWh)
(year)
(TL)
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
consumption
Savings/year
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
Energy
(kWh)
(year)
(TL)
Lamp type
7.5 W LED 7,95 W 50 11 360 1,574 35,4 1,770 3,344 1,070 1.65
Investment cost
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
consumption
Savings/year
Savings/year
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
Energy
(kWh)
(year)
(TL)
(TL)
Lamp type
As shown in Table 4, if the 20-pcs of mercury conventional fluorescent lamps are converted to
lamps are replaced by 65 W LED armature. The fluorescent lamps with electronic ballast for 18W
cost of a LED armature is 472 TL. LED lamps system, it is enough to change ballasts.
have approximately 6% losses. As shown in Approximately medium quality electronic ballast
Table 4, payback time will be found 1.81 years as cost is 7 TL (All taxes are included to this price).
a result of this replacement. The replacement of After the calculations, payback time will be found
the mercury lamp with the CFL is more feasible 3.6 years as shown in Table 7.
than the replacement of the mercury lamp with the Replacement 750 W metal halide lamps with
LED armatures. LED lamps: At the exterior lighting, there are 18-
Replacement CFL with LED lamps: At the pcs metal halide lamps. 24 number 120 W LED
exterior lighting, there are 50-pcs 23 W CFLs at lamps will be used instead of 18-pcs 750W metal
the refectory exit under the viaduct. CFL lamps halide lamps. Metal halide lamps have 14% losses
have 8% losses and LED lamps have 6% losses. and LED lamps have 6% losses. As shown in
As shown in Table 5, when 23 W CFLs are Table 8, energy saving in a year can be calculated
replaced with 7.5 W LED lamps, saving TL in a 48,924 kWh and period time can be calculated
year can be found 1,070TL and payback are found 1.04 years. At the hospital, the most of the exterior
1.65 year. lighting armatures are controlled by the day light
Replacement Fluorescent Lamp with LED sensor with the time relay. The using of these
lamps: At the exterior lighting, there are 72-pcs 18 automatic controlled systems is more efficient than
W fluorescent lamps with old type magnetic manual controlled systems. The total estimated
ballast at the cafeteria under the viaduct. 18 W energy saving as kWh for exterior lighting is
fluorescent lamps with the magnetic ballast have 75,630 kWh. Total investment for these projects is
30% ballast losses and LED lamps have 6% losses. 21,639 TL. The payback periods of feasible
As shown in Table 6, when 72-pcs 18 W projects is changed between 0.17 and 2.35 as
fluorescent lamps with the conventional magnetic shown in Table 9.
ballast are replaced with the 72-pcs 7.5 W LED
lamps, 1,409 TL will be saved in a year and 2.1.2. Interior Lighting at University Hospital
payback time will be found 1.8 year.
Most of the interior lightings armatures at
Replacement of conventional fluorescent University Hospital are conventional fluorescent
lamp with fluorescent lamp with lamps with the magnetic ballast. Fluorescent lamps
electromagnetic ballast: At the exterior lighting, with electronic ballast have been only used in old
there are 72-pcs 18 W fluorescent lamps with intensive care and there are 220-pcs 2x40 W
magnetic ballast at the cafeteria. 18 W fluorescent fluorescent lamps with electronic ballast. Total
lamps with old type magnetic ballast have 30% capacities of them are 17,600 W. At the some units
ballast losses and 18 W fluorescent lamps with of the hospital such as in the air conditioner center,
electronic ballast have 8% ballast losses. While the different types of lamps are used. But this situation
period (year)
consumption
Savings/year
Savings/year
Investment
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
cost (TL)
Unit cost
Payback
Energy
(kWh)
(TL)
(TL)
Lamp type
period (year)
consumption
Savings/year
Savings/year
Investment
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
cost (TL)
Unit cost
Payback
Energy
(kWh)
(TL)
(TL)
Lamp type
Table 9. Feasible projects for exterior lighting used for two types of system. Because of this,
there is no requirement for new armatures. As
Project Energy Energy Investment Payback shown in Table 10, 250 W mercury lamps have
number saving saving TL period 10% ballast losses and 45 W CFL lamps have 8%
kWh/year TL year losses. 16 lamps operate 24 hours in a day for
1a 17,931 5,738 1,000 0.17 360 days in a year. Electricity unit price for kWh
1b 16,323 5,223 9,440 1.81 can be taken approximately 0.32 TL according to
2 3,344 1,070 1,770 1.65 average value of day, peak and night time (All
3a 3,378 1,081 2,549 2.35 taxes are included to this price). Lamp cost is
3b 315 100 360 3.6 50 TL including all taxes.
4 48,924 15,656 16,320 1.04
Feasible Calculations:
73,577 23,545 21,639
projects Total = 16x250/1,000x24x360x1.1
consumption of
is a small part of total lamp number. For example, 250 W mercury
in the air conditioner center, 16-pcs 250W mercury lamp
lamps were used. Conventional fluorescent lamps = 38,016 kW
Total = 16x45/1,000x24x360x1.08
can be changed with CFL or LED lamps for saving consumption of
energy. 45 W CFL
= 6,718
Replacement mercury lamps with the CFL Saving kWh in a = 38,016-6,718
and LED: During this research period, 250 W year
mercury lamps in the air conditioner center of = 31,298 kWh
Emergency Unit were replaced with 45 W compact Saving TL = Saving kWh x Electricity Unit
fluorescent lamps. Same electrical socket can be in a year Price
period (year)
consumption
Savings/year
Savings/year
Investment
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
cost (TL)
Unit cost
Payback
Energy
(kWh)
(TL)
(TL)
Lamp type
= 31,298 * 0.3 TL = 10,015 TL. Medium quality electronic ballast price in market
Payback = Total Installed Cost / Total is approximately 7 TL (All taxes are included to
time (year) Saving TL. this price). 18W and 36 W electronic ballast prices
= (Lamp Cost x # of Lamp) / are almost same.
Total Saving TL.
As shown in Table 11 and Table 12, payback
= (50x16) / 10,015 = 0.08 year period is more than 1 year. Otherwise, the
Payback = 0.08 x 12 = 0.95 month demounting of old lamp and mounting of the new
time lamps are difficult and taken a long time. Because
(month) of this, this replacement operation is not feasible
for the hospital. When a new building is installing
Replacement of 18W conventional or old buildings are reconstructing, electronic
fluorescent lamps by fluorescent lamp with ballast can be preferred instead of magnetic ballast.
electronic ballast in interior lighting systems:
Because interior lighting system has large installed Replacement 18W conventional fluorescent
capacity and serves wide range of areas, local lamps with 7.5 W fluorescent LED lamps:
applications are more suitable. The values which 7.5 W fluorescent LED lamps can be used instead
are calculated at local area can be generalized for of 18 W conventional fluorescent lamps.
total areas. According to previous mentioned losses and
prices, payback period and other saving values are
Archive, radiation oncology and nuclear medicine calculated as shown in Table 13. When a new
building are taken as example areas. There are 92- installation or restoration, LED lamps are preferred
pcs 4x18W armatures in the nuclear medicine instead of fluorescent lamps electromagnetic
building, 5-pcs 2x18W armatures in the archive ballast. LED lamps are more feasible than the FLs
building and 97-pcs 4x18W armatures in the with electronic ballast.
radiation oncology building. In addition, there are
24 pcs 2x36 W armatures in nuclear medicine, When the lamps of these three building are
152-pcs 2x36W armatures in archive and 25-pcs examined for generalization, kWh per m2 can be
2x36 W armatures in the radiation oncology. Total calculated as shown in Table 14. By using
number of 18 W lamps is 766-pcs and total kWh/m2, energy saving values and saved money as
number of 36 W fluorescent lamps is 402-pcs. The TL are calculated for all area of the hospital. Total
working time of this buildings are between 08:00 area of University Hospital is 128,536 m2 closed
and 17:00 in a day. The unit electricity cost is 0.32 area. Total installed capacity of all hospital for
TL for this period (All taxes are included). While interior lighting can be found 128,536 x 9,73 =
the conventional fluorescent lamps are converted 1,250,655.28 W = 1251 kW. If all the lamps are
to fluorescent lamps with electronic ballast for considered as 18 W fluorescent lamps, the total
18W system, it is enough to change only ballasts. capacity of 69,481-pcs 18 W conventional
Investment cost
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
consumption
Savings/year
Savings/year
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
Energy
(kWh)
(year)
(TL)
(TL)
Lamp type
Savings/year (kWh)
Savings/year (TL)
Investment cost
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
(year)
(TL)
Lamp type
36 W conventional FL
46.8W 402 9 360 60,956 - - - - -
with magnetic ballast
36 W FL with electronic
ballast 38.8W 402 9 360 50,536 7 2,814 10,420 3,334 0.85
Savings/year (TL)
Investment cost
Payback period
Unit cost (TL)
consumption
Savings/year
# of lamps
hours/day
kWh/year
days/year
Energy
(kWh)
(year)
(TL)
Lamp type
18W conventional FL
23.4W 766 9 360 58,075 - - - - -
with magnetic ballast
7.5 W FL LED 7.95W 766 9 360 19,731 35.4 27,116 38,344 12,270 2.2
fluorescent lamps are calculated easily. If 4-lamp in the hospital. The practical measurement of
fixture with 18 W FL is used, 17,370-pcs 4-lamp 30 kW aspirator motor in the kitchen is shown in
fixture can be calculated. As shown in Table 15, Table 19. Reducing the speed of the motor 15% of
installed cost of LED system is 2,459,627 TL its nominal speed, 36% of energy saving can be
which is very expensive. Because of this reason provided by VSD.
and limited numbers of technical personnel, LED
lamps are preferred instead of conventional 2.2.1. Energy Saving with VSD
fluorescent lamps when the new installation or
restoration. Local areas can be designed by LED The total capacity of motors in the hospital greater
step by step. than 5.5 kW is given in Table 20. In practice, it is
very difficult to use VSDs in condenser and chiller
Table 15. Energy saving potentials for motors. All elevator motors have VSDs. Other
replacement of all 18 W FL lamps motors operate at 60-70% of loading factor. The
18W FL total capacity of motors which can be controlled by
with VSDs is 7,829.7 kW. The compressor motors in
18 W electronic chiller groups, cooling tower fan motors operate
7.5W
Lamp type conv. FL
LED FL
ballast nearly 120 days in a year and ventilator motors and
ballast (ballasts aspirator motors operate nearly 240 days in a year.
are Other motors operate nearly 360 days in a year.
changed) The average loading factor of the motors is nearly
Energy 60% of full load capacity.
consumption 23.4 W 7.95 W 19.4
(W)
Planned Project_1 is energy saving with VSD.
# of lamps 69,481 69,481 69,481
The annual electrical energy consumption of these
Hours/day 9 9 9
motors is nearly 15,495,667 kWh. The estimated
Days/year 360 360 360 energy saving potential by using VSDs is 22% of
kWh 5,267,771 1,789,692 4,367,297 total capacity which equals to 3,409,046 kWh.
Unit cost This saving equals to 1,022,714 TL/year. The total
- 35.4 7
(TL) estimated investment for this project is nearly
Total cost 930,636 TL. The payback period is approximately
- 2,459,627 486,367
(TL)
0.91 years. All motors in Table 20 are suitable for
Savings/year
(kWh)
- 3,478,079 900,474 the VSD control. Some motors such as chiller and
Savings/year conderser motors are different mechanical
- 1,112,985 288,151 structures but they have same features as a simple
(TL)
Payback asynchronous motor. The most important point to
- 2.2 years 1.68 years take into consideration is required capacity.
period (year)
Estimated energy
Estimated energy
(kWh)
Phase R S T
Without
VSD
Table 21. The planned project_2 for electrical motor and VSD systems
Motor type Energy consumption Energy saving Energy Investment
kWh/year kWh/year saving (TL) (TL)
Table 22. Energy saving potentials for overall motor and VSD systems
Investment
Motor system Saving kWh/year Saving (TL)
(TL)
and operate nearly at 60-70% of loading factor. If MW was chosen for payback analyzes of both
these motors are replaced by IE3 type motors, the cogeneration and trigeneration plants. For this
efficiency of the overall system can be increased rating, cogeneration plant with a steam boiler has
2.7% existing efficiency as shown in Table 21. The an investment cost of 1,400,000 $, annual revenue
total investment for this project is 672,345 TL. of 928,135 $ and calculated payback time of the
Energy saving TL is 125,514. As a result, payback investment is 1.51 years. For trigeneration plant
period can be calculated as 5.36 years which is not with double-effect absorption chiller, system cost
feasible for the hospital. Energy saving potentials is 2,050,000 $, annual revenue of the system is
for overall motor and VSD systems are shown in 900,405 $ and payback time of the system cost is
Table 22. Bold color project is feasible for the 2.27 years [14]. Other implemented and suggested
hospital. projects on the HVAC systems are presented in
below sub-sections.
2.3. Implemented and Suggested Projects on
the HVAC Systems 2.3.1. Heat Saving
As calculated in [14], a capacity rating of 2.145 The total capacity of motors in the hospital greater
than 5.5 kW is given in Table 20. In practice, it is escape and outside air from entering. Arranging
very difficult to use VSDs in condenser and chiller the non-automatic and always left open outer doors
motors. All elevator motors have VSDs. Other as automatic doors with air curtains will be useful
motors operate at 60-70% of loading factor. The to keep conditioned air inside the building. The
total capacity of motors which can be controlled by approximate cost of an automatic doors and its air
VSDs is 7,829.7 kW. Steam leaks consist because curtain is around maximum 7,000 TL. The
of inadequacy insulation of heat center. For fuel polyclinic parts of ground floor exits and the both
saving and obtaining efficiency at desired values, of exits which are between morgue-kitchen need to
the steam lines should be renewed and its be reorganized.
insulation should be performed. However, for
renew of this line, galleries should be also Use of Chemicals in Heating and Cooling
renewed. In galleries there is no enough space for Systems: Energy saving can be satisfied with the
these renewal processes. use of chemicals which make the transfer of heat
without loss by preventing calcification in all
Automatic blow-down system and degasser insulation for heating and cooling system (1 mm
devices are required on the steam boilers which are calcification in the installation causes
used in the heat centers. These changes should be approximately 1-2% energy loss). Total energy
performed on boilers in heat center while transition consumption of the University Hospital for last 12
to natural gas. This point was reported to the months is 4,749.40 TOE (23,960,320 kWh
Department of Construction and Technical Works. electrical energy (2,060.58 TOE) and 2,727 tonnes
fuel oil (2,688.82 TOE)). Annual estimated gain
In university hospital building the existing heat from this investment is 47.49 TOE.
exchangers should be replaced with plate heat The lifetime of installations will be longer and
exchangers when they are broken or out of run. All getting resistance against corrosion and abrasion
pipes in hospital air conditioning room are will be satisfied.
required to be renewed by checking their Its annual cost is 40,000 TL.
insulations for the purpose of heat leakages. The
valves existing in heat center and air conditioning Valve insulation jacket application: Due to
room should be insulated. non-isolated control devices (steam traps, check
Thermostatic valves should be used on radiators valves, etc.) used in heating and cooling systems,
because the polyclinic blocks are heated by energy losses occur in the heat center and hospital.
radiator system. The old pipelines of central For example, heat loss of a 40 mm steam valve is
heating system should be renewed and radiators measured as 1,344 kcal/h without insulation and
should be replaced by the efficient ones. But, if 166 kcal/h with insulation using the heat thermal
renovating of polyclinic will be performed, this imaging cameras. The loss difference is
system should be completely removed and central 1,178 kcal/h. The annual saving from these control
air conditioning system Variable Refrigerant devices is approximately 10,177,920 kcal. There
Volume-Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRV-VRF) are 1,250 numbers of control devices with different
should be applied and fresh air heat recovery diameters in the hospital. To minimize this losses,
devices should be designed. The elimination of as a result of providing insulation with heat-
radiators will satisfy fuel-oil saving. insulating jacket of control elements of the
installation. A sample of measurements is shown
The fuel system in heat center will be changed to in Figure 1 and Figure 2.
natural gas system because of that there is no need
for investment in improvement of fuel currently. 10,177,920 kcal×1250-pcs=1,272,240,000 kcal
can be saved. (127.22 TOE)
Air Curtains: Air curtains should be placed on Financial gain of this insulation is approximately
the doors opening to the outside in the hospital. 1,272,240,000 kcal / 1,785 = 712,739,000 kg
This will prevent the inside conditioned air to steam × 0.121TL = 862,414TL/year.
Heating and cooling process continue for an these air conditioners are accepted to operate on
average 8 months in a year. In this case, the annual average 8 hours per day they will consume energy
saving is 862,414× (8/12) = 574,942TL/year. 264 days of a year from 22 work days per month.
From here, the annual energy consumption per day
The insulation cost of 1,250 control devices is is calculated as 9,559.2kW × 264 day =
approximately 90,000 TL. The investment pays for 2,444,428.8 kWh annual consumption. Its cost is
itself in 2-3 months. The lifetime of thermal 733,328.64TL/year.
insulation material is considered as 5-10 years.
[15] shows that the energy saving rate of air
conditioning in hall is 19.7–49.3%. Similarly at
[16] and its investigated studies show that, VRV
system improves the energy efficiency and reduces
cooling energy consumption for part load
conditions lower than 50%. Because of this and
similar situation, after installing to inverter system
(central air-conditioning system or VRV system
can be) average saving will be 40% generally.
2,444,428.8kW×0.40=977,771.52kWh×0.32TL
Figure 1. Steam valves with/without valve jacket
=312,886.88 TL annual savings would be
achieved. Approximately 1,450,000TL investment
is required for the all air conditioners. The
investment will pay for itself over 4.63 years
which is not feasible for the hospital.
published on 25.02.2012 by the high planning saving and comfortable room temperature.
council and measures were taken to improve the However, the coating is required to protect heat
efficiency which were planned to perform until insulation materials from damage. This process
2023. According to regulation with law number will eliminate the cost of painting and maintenance
27035 related with increasing efficiency for energy of the facades and will be used without any
resources and in the use of energy, the public operation to exterior facade as the lifetime of the
section buildings which have total construction used coating material. The paint and plaster on the
area at least 10,000m2 or the total annual energy exterior facade are blistering and the rips occurred
consumption is greater or equal to 250 TEP in the rainy weather over time when expose to sun
(tonnes of oil equivalent) have to employ an and rain can be totally prevented. 26-48% of the
energy manager or take the service of energy heat lost from a building is sourced from windows.
management (250 TOE equals to 2,907,500 kWh). Changing all used glasses with double glazing
Total annual electric energy consumption of our glasses or with drawling of double-sided film to
hospital in 2012 was 21,303,600.00 kWh. It is glasses will save most of the energy. This process
estimated that the total consumption will be will prevent both the escape of heat such and the
25,000,000.00 kWh with the new plants, loads and entering inside of cold or warm air. The insulation
transformer putting into use in 2013. The of the rooftop and basement of the building should
regulation of energy performance on buildings be performed.
published in the official gazette no 27075 on
05.12.2008 legally obliges to take Energy Total external facade: 35,000m2
Performance Certificate (EKB) for the existing The cost of insulation and jacketing: 150 TL/m2
buildings which are new and with a floor area Total investment cost (approximately):
greater than 1,000m2. 5,250,000 TL
Energy performance certificate have to be arranged The total annual energy cost of hospital last 12
for the existing buildings and for buildings under months is approximately 12,000,000 TL
construction and not yet received permission to use (5,000,000 TL (price of electricity without lighting
the building in ten years from the date of and other equipment expenditures) + 7,000,000 TL
publication of the Law on Energy Efficiency fuel-oil). If minimum 30% of consumed energy is
(before 02.05.2017). saved only from exterior insulation and jacketing;
Energy consumed for cooling 3 MVA during 4
It is required to perform insulation and jacketing to months (instantaneous consumption). Saving
facade of our buildings until the date 02.05.2017 potential for electricity consumption is
according to the related regulations. Insulation will 5,000,000×0.32=1,600,000×4/12=533,333.00 TL.
provide to reach the desired heat inside fast and Annual fuel-oil consumption in stokehole is
minimize losses so it will prevent to operate 7,000,000 TL. 80% of fuel-oil consumption is used
motors of heating or cooling systems at full for heating. Saving from there will be
capacity. At the same time it will provide the fuel- 7,000,000×0.80×0.32= 1,792,000 TL.
Most of the energy cost is related with heating and specification for MV/LV distribution power
cooling (fuel-oil and electric energy). In addition transformers, a standard 1000 kVA step-down
the cost of painting for every 5 years will be transformer has 10.5 kW load losses and 2 kW no-
eliminated with the exterior painting of the load losses. Type-A 1000 kVA step-down
building. Annul saving from the exterior painting transformer has 8.9 kW load losses and 1.45 kW
will be approximately 250,000 TL. In this case, the no-load losses. Type-A 1000 kVA high efficiency
total savings become 1,792,000 + transformer consumes 2.15 kW less energy than a
533,333+250,000= 2,575,333 TL. The total standard 1000 kVA transformer. The annual loss
investment is considered as 5,250,000.Investment difference can be calculated as 2.15x24x360=
will take to pay for itself in 2.03 years 18,576 kWh. In Turkey, the unit price of electricity
(5,250,000/2,575,333). Because the total is a 0.16$ (All taxes are included to this price).
installation cost of this project is very high, this Annual saving is 2,973 $. The purchase price of
project is not easy to implement. Type-A 1000 kVA transformer is 2,400$ more
expensive than a standard one. The payback period
Personals and end Users’ Education: It is of this investment is nearly 10 months.
important to keep windows and doors closed for
cooling and heating. The lamps that are not needed 3. CONCLUSIONS
to operate should be turned off. Personal should
turn off the electrical devices which are not needed In this research paper, the best energy saving
except drug box, refrigerator etc. at the end of the approaches and energy efficiency improvement
working hours. Especially split air conditioners, methods for University Hospital giving the
computers and printers should be closed. At only payback periods of the suggestions were
the Hospital Information and Management System developed. Approximately up to 10% energy
Department, more than 800 computers and 500 saving without any charges can be achieved by
printers have been used approximately. Even if a using simple precautions. The findings of this
device consumes electricity one thousandth of research study help the engineers and managers in
normal consumption, when considering the total the hospitals for reducing energy consumption
number of devices, their effect will be large. while maintaining the quality of service.
This paper proves that applying the energy
UPS Efficiency: New technology 3-level (3-L) efficiency and saving practices will save
UPSs of ENEL Company are 6% more efficient considerable amounts in the electrical bills and
than traditional transformer based UPSs for 100% fuel. In this paper, new energy consumption rates
of full load capacity. The efficiency difference is by suggesting energy improvement applications
10% for 50% of full load capacity. For example, and energy saving methods are compared with the
100 kVA 3-L UPS saves $8,760 (50,265 kWh) a present energy consumption rates in the hospital.
year in electricity costs than transformer based As a result of the detailed analysis on the existing
UPS. The payback period for this replacement is system, 20-40% of energy saving potential is
approximately 2 or 3 years. At the hospital, all estimated at the University Hospital.
UPSs are transformer based type. The loading
capacity of the UPSs is approximately 25%. 4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
gas engines for unlicensed generation of HVAC Systems Considering Economic and
electricity, FYL-2014-2351. Environmental Aspects at the Hospitals,
Renew.& Sustain. Energy Reviews, Vol. 33,
5. REFERENCES pp. 224-235.
12. Velimir C., Bogdan P., Nebojsa P., 2014.
1. Buonomano A., Calise F., Ferruzzi G., Palombo A., Methods for Assessing Energy Savings in
2014. Dynamic Energy Performance analysis: Case Hospitals Using Various Control Techniques,
Study for Energy Efficiency Retrofits of Hospital Energy and Buildings, Vol. 69, pp. 85-92.
Buildings, Energy, Vol. 78, pp. 555-572. 13. COMED, Calculating Energy Savings
2. Teke, A., Timur. O., 2013. Lighting Systems Estimates for the Chicago Bungalow Energy
at the Hospitals: An Overview, Majlesi Efficiency Show Case Home, 9 p.
Journal of Energy Manag. Vol. 2, pp. 39-51. 14. Zor K., 2015. Developing a Software Program
3. Timur O., 2013. Energy Efficiency to Determine the Optimal Capacity Rating of
Improvement and Energy Saving Cogeneration and Trigeneration Plants Driven
Opportunities at Çukurova University Balcalı by Gas Engines For Unlicensed Generation of
Hospital, MSc Thesis, Çukurova University, Electricity, MSc Thesis, Çukurova University,
Dept. of Electrical and Electronics Eng., 87 p.
Department of Electrical and Electronics
15. Wang Y., Wong K.K.L., Du H., Qing J., Tu J.,
Engineering, 267 p.
2014. Design Configuration for a Higher
4. Saidur, R., 2010. A Review on Electrical Efficiency Air Conditioning System in Large
Motors Energy Use and Energy Savings, Space Building, Energy and Buildings, Vol.
Elsevier: Renew. and Sust. Energy Reviews 72, pp.167-176.
(14), pp. 877-898. 16. Zhaoi D., Zhang X., Zhong M., 2015.
5. Saidur, R., Hasanuzzaman, M., Rahim, N.A., Variable Evaporating Temperature Control
2010. Energy Consumption, Energy Savings Strategy for VRV System Under Part Load
and Emission Analysis for Industrial Motors, Conditions in Cooling Mode, Energy and
Proceedings of the 2010 Int. Conf. on Buildings.
Industrial Eng. and Operations Manag., pp. 1-
6.
6. Abdelaziz, E.A., Saidur, R., Mekhilef, S.,
2011. A Review on Energy Saving Strategies
in Industrial Sector, Elsevier: Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 15, pp.
150-168.
7. Yumurtaci Z., Sarigul A., 2011. Santrifüj
Pompalarda Enerji Verimliliği ve
Uygulamaları, MMO Tesisat Mühendisliği
Dergisi, pp. 49-58.
8. Teke A., Timur O., 2013. Electric Motors and
Variable Speed Drives at the Hospitals: An
Overview, Majlesi Journal of Energy
Management, Vol. 2, No 3.
9. ECSG, www.energyconservation.sg/.
10. Hu S.C., Chen J.D., Chuah Y.K., 2004.
Energy Cost and Consumption in a Large
Acute Hospital, International Journal on
Architectural Science, Vol. 5, Number 1, pp.
11-19.
11. Teke A., Timur O., 2014. Assessing the
Energy Efficiency Improvement Potentials of