Waldorf Science Newsletter 16 26
Waldorf Science Newsletter 16 26
Spring 2010
         1
2
                                 Waldorf Science
                  Explorations in Phenomenology as Practiced in Waldorf Schools
                                                                   3
                                          Books of Interest
                                                                     The book containes many interesting facts that will
                                                                   delight the reader such as:
                                                                       • Members of different
                                                                         species of butterfly in
                                                                         the same forest envi-
                                                                         ronment develop similar coloration based on
                                                                         the prevailing patterns of color and light and
                                                                         shadow in the forest.
                                                            5
                                                                  Michael’s Sanctuary in Chonae (From the Greek)	
                                                                  The Sanctuary of Michael on Mount Gargano (Latin)	
                                                                  Mont Saint-Michel (French Legend)
                                                                  Mont Saint-Michel (Chronicle of the City of Speyer)	
                                                                  The Leper Jew			
                                                                  The Unfulfilled Vow			
                                                                  The Blind Man	
                                                                  The Possessed		
                                                                  Sequence on St. Michael Dedicated to Emperor
                                                                  	      Charlemagne (Hymn from the Middle Ages)	
                                                                  The Dragon of Ireland (French Legend)		
                                                                  Michael as Friend of Mankind (Icelandic Legend)	
                                                                  Michael Leads the Army of Barbarossa (German)	
Waldorf Journal Project #15                                       To St. Michael (Latin Hymn, 11th century)			
Michaelmas                                                        How Henry II Beheld Michael on Monte Gargano and 	
Edited by David Mitchell                                             How He Was Touched and Lamed by Him (German)	
                                                                  Prayer (From Old Norway, circa 1300)		
Contents                                                          The Death of St. Elizabeth of Thuringa (German)	
                                                                  Lucifer’s Crown (From the “Singers’ Contest on the 	
Teacher Study:                                                    	      Wartburg,” 13th century) 			
Michaelmas and the Soul Forces of the Human Being                 The Vision of Jeanne d’Arc			
The Activity of Michael and the Future of Humanity 	              Michael, the Angel, Speaketh			
The Michael-Christ-Experience of Humankind                        St. Michael on the Crescent Moon (Polish Legend)	
The Work of Michael                                               Of Michael, the Archangel (From the Russian)
Why Do Waldorf Schools Celebrate Michaelmas?                      Why the Sole of Man’s Foot Is not Even	
Working with the Festivals through the Twelve Senses              Miner’s Song (From Bohemia)			
                                                                  The Devil’s Scythe (French Legend)	
Stories and Legends for Teachers to Tell:		                       What the Peasants of Normandy Tell about Michael	
Feast of St. Michael (From The Golden Legend)			                  The Twelfth Chapter of the Revelation of St. John		
Michael Legends (by Pico Della Mirandola)			                      Concerning the Iron in the Kalewala and the Spiritual 	
Gothic Hymn unto the Archangel Michael (Greek)		                  	      Forge in the North 		
Michael (Greek Hymn from the Middle Ages) 		                      Michael Legend from the Philippines	
Michael as Indra (Rigveda)	                                       The Legend of Mont Saint-Michel by Guy de 		
The Bhagadvad-Gita as a Reflection of Michael’s Battle in 	       	      Maupassant
	     Heaven					
Michael as Mithras (From the Avesta)				                          148 pages 	       8.5 x 11 inches	   Spiralbound     	
Mithras, Revealing the Sacred Names (Mithras Liturgy)		           			               Illustrated
Michael as Marduk (After the Babylonian Song of World)
Creation of Adam			                                               Available through AWSNA Publications at cost
Michael as Guardian of the Word			                                and Online gratis at >http://www.waldorflibrary.org/pg/
Michael Tests Moses’ Willingness to Sacrifice			                  journalFocus/journalFocus.asp?journalID=15<.
Michael as Savior of Isaac			
Moses’ Death			
The Four Winds			
The Rainbow			
The Bowl of the World			
The Book of the Seventy-Two Signs			
Michael as Guardian of Paradise (Medieval Tale)	 	
Golgotha (Russian Legend)			
Michael and the Risen One (Easter Play, 15th century)	
Michael and Evil (Ancient Bulgarian Legend)		
Michael and the Doubter (German Legend)		
                                                              6
                                                                The Metamorphosis of Plants
Colloquium on High School Physics                               by J.W. von Goethe
Organized by the Waldorf High School Research Group             This book is a wonderful validation of the scientific worth
through the Research Instititute                                of Goethe’s pioneering researches on morphology. Here
                                                                Goethe “coupled rigorous empiricism with precise imagi-
A group of experienced teachers discuss and explore             nation to see particular natural phenomena as concrete
the Waldorf physics curriculum and suggest new ideas            symbols of the universal principles, organizing ideas [to
while solving some of the riddles found in the current          perceive] the inner laws of nature,” says the editor Gordon
curriculum.                                                     Miller. Published by the MIT Press in hardcover with high
                                                                quality paper and stunning colored illustrations, this book
AWSNA Publications		             8.5 x 11 inches                is an absolute treasure.
Pages 98	   Spiralbound	         Illustrated
                                                                ISBN 978-0-262-01309-3
                                                                Pages 123 	   6.25 x 8.25 inches	       Hardcover
                                                                Price: $30.00 				                      Illustrated
                                                                The MIT Press Available through AWSNA Publications
Growing Patterns
Fibonacci Numbers in Nature
by Sarah C. Campbell
This title holds a lot of promise but the book was a let-
down. The illustrations are lovely but the text is overly
simplistic. Recommended only for those who know                            Coming in the autumn of 2010
absolutely nothing about the Fibonacci sequence.
                                                                       Mathematics in the Eleventh Class
ISBN 978-1-59078-752-6
Pages: 32	     12.25 x 7.5 		             Hardcover             AWSNA Publications is currently translating this resource
Price: $17.97 				                        Illustrated           book for Waldorf high schools in North America. An an-
Boyd Mills Press                                                nouncement will be made when the book is available. The
                                                                edition for the 10th grade mathematics is available and can
                                                                be ordered Online through Books & More at the AWSNA
                                                                website.
                                                            7
Research Bulletin Autumn/Winter 2009                              Research Bulletin Spring/Summer 2010
Volume XIV, Number 2                                              Volume XV, Number 1
Editor: Stephen Keith Sagarin, PhD Editor: Stephen Keith Sagarin, PhD
Dedicated to furthering research in education, the Re-             • 	What Can Rudolf Steiner’s Words to the First Waldorf
search Bulletin provides schools with studies and data that           Teachers Tell Us Today?
place Waldorf education at the forefront of the educational        • 	Social Emotional Intelligence: The Basis for a New
scene in North America. Key topics in this issue are:                 Vision of Education in the United States	
                                                                   • 	Rudolf Steiner’s Research Methods for Teachers
  • The Social Mission of Waldorf School Communities               •	 Combined Grades in Waldorf Schools: Creating
  • Identity and Governance                                           Classrooms Teachers Can Feel Good About
  • Changing Old Habits: Exploring New Models for                  • 	Educating Gifted Students in Waldorf Schools
    Professional Development                                       • 	How Do Teachers Learn with Teachers?
  • Developing Coherence: Meditative Practice in                   • 	Does Our Educational System Contribute to
    Waldorf School Colleges of Teachers                               Attentional and Learning Difficulties in Our Children?
  • Teacher’s Self-Development as a Mirror of Children’s           • 	Survey on Waldorf School Trustee Education
    Incarnation: Part II
  • Social Emotional Education and Waldorf Education              Pages: 72	 7.5 x 11 inches 			             Price: $12.00
  • Television in, and the Worlds of, Today’s Children: A         Available from AWSNA Publications
    Mounting Cultural Controversy
  • Russia’s History, Culture, and the Thrust Toward
    High-Stakes Testing: Reflections on a Recent Visit
                                                                  Phenomenological Organic Chemistry
                                                                  For the Ninth Grade
  • Da, Vadorvskii! Finding an Educational Approach for
                                                                  by Manfred von Mackensen
    Children with Disabilities in a Siberian Village
                                                                  Through the stellar efforts of
as well as the writings of our Research Fellows. If you
                                                                  Peter Glasby from Australia, we
have not seen the latest edition, you are encouraged to
                                                                  now have an English version of
obtain a subscription available from: 		
                                                                  Manfred von Mackensen’s Phe-
                                                                  nomenological Organic Chemistry.
             researchinstitute@earthlink.net
                                                                  Included are experiment descrip-
                                                                  tions, discussion of deeper themes
80 pages		       7.5 x 11 inches           Price $12.00
                                                                  and methodology for carrying
Available from AWSNA Publications
                                                                  out student laboratory projects.
                                                                  Contents include: deeper thoughts
                                                                  on the intent of the curriculum;
                                                                  Stages of Refinement; Combustion; Fragrances; Petroleum;
                                                                  Essential Oils; Anasthetis; and much more.
                                                                  ISBN # 978-1-888365-79-5
                                                                  Pages 134		      	    8.5 x 11		           Softbound
                                                                  Illustrated						                          Price $25.00	
                                                                  Available from AWSNA Publications
                                                              8
Going Through, taking in, Considering
A Three-Phase Process of Learning as a Method of “Teaching Main Lesson Blocks”1
by
      Curtain Raiser
         We would like to elaborate certain phases of teaching by, deliberately,
      taking an example from our everyday life. Occurrences which usually
      take place in school may, for the time being, be projected onto a private
      situation. So let us have a try on three phases and imagine the following:
      Are these really three phases? Let us have a look again at what exactly
      happens here.
        At the beginning, one just throws oneself into the crowd (Phase I). One
      makes acquaintances without thinking much about it and enjoys meeting
      with the people who turn up. Any form of investigation or classifying
      would be distracting.—Afterwards, all that is resounding in both of them
      (Phase II); both are still preoccupied with what they experienced2 and,
      while talking it over, their emotions unite the details automatically. The
      ups and downs of the party now appear more as a related “whole,” and
      less as a mere series of events. Something that was frightening changes
      into a deep impression, rejoicing into true interest, a muddle into a
      sequence of related scenes. Later on, one dissects that “whole” again into
      fragments and discusses their interrelations (Phase III). One examines
      ___________________
      1. This paper was written during the work on the project Phenomenological
      Natural Science and Human Didactics. In conferences and courses it has served
      as a text for introduction, reflection, and fixation. At the same time it can be
      regarded as an example for how to organize teaching lessons (Pädagogische
      Forschungsstelle beim Bund der Freien Waldorfschulen Stuttgart, Abt. Kassel,
      Brabanterstrasse 30, 34131 Kassel).
      2. Perhaps humming softly the refrain of a song, such as “Going through, Sing-
      ing about, ….”
                                             9
how this related to that, who has secretly wanted what or who has
suffered, and so on (a). One is digging for insights, for knowledge (b).
Finally, one ponders, asks what consequences will follow, and also, how
oneself could achieve something (c).
  In this story, not a word about school lessons appeared. It
demonstrates how the three elements of the elaborated method work
in real life.
An Example
Figure 1: A flexible tube, with marks every two meters, is hanging down
a wall. The second mark at the lower end bears a little flag with “2m”
written on it. The bucket is filled to the brim with water.
                                    10
   (b.) The lower end is now dunked into the bucket provided which is
filled to the brim with water, causing an overflow, and another student
puts his hand into it and after counting “1,2,3!” the plug under water
is pulled out. Immediately, several meters of the water in the tube runs
into the bucket. But surprisingly, most of the water remains in the tube.
The water level settles down around the 10-meter mark. Now, from the
top down to approximately 8 meters high, the tube is “squeezed” in the
middle:
After the bucket has been refilled, an assistant in the window draws
the attention to the water level in the tube. The pupils count the meter
marks down to the surface of the water in the filled-up bucket. The
number remains the same, even when the upper end of the tube is moved
downwards or when the bucket is lifted upwards.
(c.) When, just for a short moment, the lower end of the tube is taken
out of the bucket, approximately 1 meter of water runs out. Its space
is replaced by air. This air rises in the tube as a stretched bubble, and,
afterwards, the water level is several meters lower than before.
(d.) If the upper plug is pulled out, the remaining water column shoots
into the bucket, causing again an overflow. The tube is thrown to the
ground. Now it is straight again, that means, no longer squeezed like in
Fig. 2.
                                     11
explanations. Everything that gets mentioned is accepted, as you would
do during a good meal in the hut after a tiring alpine tour. A cheerful
common feeling runs through all and everything and should be kept light.
Perhaps somebody writes some key words on the blackboard, so that the
collective experience can be recalled later. The beginning of a sketch
similar to Fig. 1 may also be drawn on the blackboard.
  This recollection is not at all a purely subjectively roaming; however
objective judgments of facts, such as cause and effect for example,
are avoided or simply ignored. What arise are collective images, clear
enough for all to remember: this was first and that followed. Through
the teacher calling the attention of the pupils to the closed-in water, the
air and the way the water runs out, as well as to the air surrounding, the
beginning of explanations could be anticipated. It is this anticipation that
should be worked towards.
 • Could the upper plug hold the water column from above—
   without any threads between the bottom of the plug and the
   surface of the water? If not:
 • Could the water in the bucket from downwards up carry the
   water column above it; does the size of the bucket play a part
   here?
 • Could the water in the bucket at least slow down the running out?
 • What is it that squeezes the tube; and why isn’t the lower end
   squeezed too? 	
 • What is contained in the tube above the water level?
 • How strong was the carrying force of the air pressure shown
   to us, expressed in meters of water column? How many meters
   would it be if we used other fluids (salt water, oil)? Would the
   water column have the same height everywhere on earth and at
   all times?
 • Does the air temperature play a role? Yes, through the pressure
   of the steam, at 20° C it is 23 millibar which equals to 23 cm of
   water column. But those finer details don’t have to be explained
   in Grade 8 yet, nor any of the other questions before.
                                    12
back when it swings downwards. Rather there is something invisible
at work here, namely the “endless ocean of air.” And moreover it is
important that the standard aero-mechanical explanation with the help of
the pressure of the outer air upon the water surface in the bucket, should
not be ruling alone here,3 but should be expanded through ‘vaguely’
qualitative elements, like “endless,” “ocean of air” or “horror vacui.”4
These elements direct the attention less to the mechanical facts but
rather lead the pupils to feel, to understand, even to immerse themselves
in a subject. This is the only way to motivate a pupil towards a lasting
striving for knowledge and learning. In addition to the logical subjects
and the pure qualitative aspects, there might arise more widening
questions, like changes of the air pressure, the influence of the weather,
breathing in relation to the flying heights of airplanes, and so on.
______________
3. It is well known that the actual air pressure drives the water against a vacuum
up to a height of about 10 m above the surface of the water upon which the air
presses, no matter whether the tube is sloping or lying in waves. These measures
can be only approximate because the air pressure changes with the weather, often
hours until days in advance; i.e. about +5 or –10%, and also because it generally
decreases along with the height above sea level (in 5.500 m by 50 %).
4. It is the term for an experience; built on the discovery that the world is lacking
the natural, continual vacuum spaces. The “horror vacui” was, during thousands
of years, an important, fundamental force of earth and heaven and was attributed
to the universe, as also was philosophically given its place. Today we see it more
in terms of some continuous pictorial gesture.
                                        13
around the pupil and will become seeds for him to sprout, so that he
won’t get emotionally petrified by being exposed to mere definitions
and final statements. And still, these open terms should provide a basis
for a deeper elaboration of the matter, since everything has to end in
professional knowledge.—How could this, generally, be achieved?
2. Concerning Phase II
  Looking merely at information, it is just a repetition of Phase I. In
reality however, everything is different. Nothing at all gets repeated.
Completely different mental powers are devoted to a problem when the
person moves from one inner activity to the next: at the beginning, he
used his will, now his feeling. In Phase I, the pupil struggled to sort out
his own recollected imaginations. Now these imaginations are picked
up in class and the group process helps him to harmonize and confirm
them. The emotions of all group members are flowing together, so that
a cheerful sense of community replaces the preceding silent feeling of
helplessness and captivation. Through this, the unconnected facts of
the initial confrontation are brought on a way towards being embedded
in something greater. In Phase I, the inner pictures of the pupil are
pushed back and forth by the outer occurrences. In Phase II, they will
be mentally refreshed in such a way that they can serve as a seedbed
for something new, mentally as well as intellectually, which ought to
grow during Phase III; even if, superficially, the experimental noises
are, at first, only followed by nice word noises. In any case the students
will begin to look out for the context of it all. Connecting links seem to
emerge. The pupil even gets the impression that he achieved something.
At this stage of Phase II, the teaching may pause.
                                     14
a new construct of ideas. This was caused, on the one hand, by writing
down a review of the experiments, quite possibly in the style of Phase
II, and by the natural settling-down and the ripening process during the
night.
  On the next morning, the gelled imaginations will call for evaluation,
expansion, and categorizing through a joint exchange of ideas in class!
Only thereafter, the time will come to start the necessary general survey,
and for the teacher to deliver broader contemplations, e.g., Why is this
topic so important? What else belongs to it? The history of discoveries
in this field, special tools and measuring devices, technical applications
and/or accidents may come into play, and ecological problems are
to be regarded.5 At the end, during the final lecture of the teacher,
the group process is carried by a sense of community and sympathy.
Before that, however, during the process of questioning and searching,
uncompromising and distance have been prevailing, i.e., antipathy
contracted into mere facts.
****
  Other scientists, too, are striving for such a way in three phases. Klaus
Schmidt, one of the most famous and successful archaeologists of the
present time, talks about strategies like this when he tries to comprehend
“the oldest monuments of mankind,”7 in this case the context of a
complex structure of an entire excavated temple city.8 This early
metropolis was founded with all its buildings, murals and other objects
of art at the end of the glacier epoch. It is not yet known why, after
several thousands of years, the whole town became completely filled up
again, buried up to the wall copings in the hidden seclusion of Anatolia
up to our time—a phenomenon that seems to be from another world.
________________
5. How to include such aspects within the period on physics of class 8, and also
more about the pressure of the air and so on, one will find in: M. v. Mackensen:
A Phenomena-Based Physics, Vol. 3 for Grade 8, AWSNA Publications.
The problems that airplanes have by the pressure of the air are described in Hof-
berger/Mackensen : Flug, Landung, Absturz; Publ.:Verlag Bildungswerk Kassel,
2009 (in preparation).
6. The author describes how the different judging forces of the soul are active
and at work in all three stages, also how then the logic of the subject opens up to
“over-logical” extensions, in “Urteilstätigkeiten . . . ,” Kassel, 2009.
7. The title of the accompanying book; edited; Badisches Landesmuseum Karl-
sruhe 2007, published; K. Theiss Verlag, Stuttgart.
8. Klaus Schmidt; Sie bauten einen Tempel; dtv München, 2008, p 1909.
                                        15
       And yet, here lies the origin of our culture, upon which followed
    the ancient empires and, finally, Europe. “To look at, to describe, to
    understand,” that is now the general working plan of the research team at
    Göbekli Tepe. Three separate steps! Otherwise, the unexpected would be
    overwhelming. We, immediately, see that these steps basically correspond
    to our three phases, provided the aim is not only to categorize the
    structures of the excavated objects but also to sort out the mental state of
    the humans involved.
       And indeed, where anyhow would we end up, if teaching would not be
    life itself?
      Phase II works for the short term memory, the efforts in thinking of
    Phase III for the long-term one. And if the latter also open up to the mind
    to make out the intrinsic character of man and world, the striving for
    knowledge becomes education. Then, a stepping through the three phases
    will encourage the student to want to remain committed to his world. This
    would be an initial exercise for his subsequent freedom, which would
    then be not to let oneself be washed over arbitrarily by pleasure, but to
    find fulfillment in one’s own awareness and conscious actions so that his
    freedom, later in life, exceeds the influence of school.
      These three steps should grasp the entire adolescent person: body, soul
    and mind. And in his soul: his thinking, his feeling and his will (Steiner).9
    And always all the three simultaneously, just different combined. That
    should needs to be elaborated more deeply. Not only concepts and logic
    should be troubled. We did point out in the above paragraph (Section A of
    this Chapter): a progression from a mere transfer of information to a step
    forward in life, i.e. from abstract learning towards a real development,
    transformation instead of information.
    __________________
    9. Rudolf Steiner, 1919 and 1921, GA 293 and 302, especially lecture III.
                                            16
                                          The Geometry of Life
                                               Toward a Science of Form
by Arthur Zajonc
                                                                17
                                                                       The forms of plants and animals have been more
                                                                  resistant to precise mathematical description. True,
                                                                  individuals such as the Scottish biologist D’Arcy
                                                                  Thompson have in their treatment of organic forms drawn
                                                                  upon geometry to establish connections between a great
                                                                  variety of plants and animals. The apparatus of geometry,
                                                                  however, is introduced only toward the end of D’Arcy
                                                                  Thompson’s classic On Growth and Form, and only in
                                                                  an elementary way. In the famous last chapter, “On the
                                                                  Theory of Transformation or the Comparison of Related
                                                                  Forms,” he lays systems of coordinate nets over various
                                                                  animals or skeletal members. By imagining these nets as
                                                                  subject to particular systematic distortions, the form of
                                                                  one species can be geometrically transformed into that of
                                                                  another with remarkable fidelity. The adjoining drawing
                                                                  shows what I mean (figure 1). As an example, he takes the
                                                                  fish Polyprion and places over it a rectangular coordinate
                                                                  system and then transforms it to an alternate coordinate
                                                                  system to yield the species Pseudopriacanthus altus. The
                                                                  original form, that of the Polyprion, is given rather than
                                                                  constructed, and thereafter is transformed point by point
                                                                  via his “method of transformed coordinates.”
                                                                       D’Arcy Thompson’s work is only a hint at a more
                                                Figure 1.
                                                                  general and powerful use of geometry in the study of
                                                                  form in nature. As I hope to show, if we consciously
approach has been too limited in scope or too inflexible.         develop geometry with the principles of transformation
The concepts we bring to bear are often bound by our              foremost, we gradually move from the most elementary
very conception of space and the movements we think               to more and more complex transformations. In so doing
possible within that space. To comprehend the geometry            we are following the program put forward in 1872 by the
of forms in the living world, new concepts may be                 brilliant mathematician and pedagogue Felix Klein. His
needed, ones intimately wedded to organic phenomena.              work, and especially that of his Norwegian collaborator,
The task of finding such concepts is not a simple one,            Sophus Lie, provides the basis for a geometry that can
but there are paths that beckon and individuals who               be used to study certain of nature’s forms. This study has
have begun to explore them. The path we are going to              been pursued by several geometers, of whom Lawrence
pursue here is that of projective geometry. It embraces a         Edwards is the most recent and most successful. Much
vision of space far more dynamic, far more general, than          of this article concerns the discoveries he has made and
the one implicit in Euclidean geometry. By giving up the          continues to make. But before we enter into Edwards’s
rigid, restricted movements of Euclidean geometry, we             study of organic forms, I would like to try to give the
gradually rise to a wonderful, fluid form of geometry,            reader some sense for the mobility and beauty of the
one with which we may hope to capture at least a small            mathematical thought with which he works.
portion of those forms the living world displays before                When asked by King Archelaos for an easier way
us. This is, after all, a world characterized by becoming,        into geometry, Euclid is said to have replied, “There is no
by development, by growth and decay. It seems                     royal road to geometry.” The nineteenth-century German
somehow appropriate to approach the living world with             mathematician Hankel was certainly thinking of Euclid
a geometry of becoming.                                           when he called projective geometry the royal road to all
    The study of geometry and pattern in the inorganic            mathematics. Once one travels a way along that road,
world is an old and honorable pursuit. From the                   Morris Kline’s more recent sentiment quickly becomes
hexagonal forms of the snowflake to the intricate dance           one’s own: “In the house of mathematics there are many
of the planets, both the static and dynamic patterns              mansions, and the most elegant is projective geometry.”
of the physical universe have been systematically                 Yet for all that it is a mostly forgotten mansion today, and
described.                                                        so we must spend a moment or two retracing its elements.
                                                             18
                                                                          Pyrite crystals–cubic and dodecahedral.
                                                                          From the editor’s collection, found in Austria
    It is to the Renaissance artists of the fifteenth and              is touched by each visual ray and the object is thereby
sixteenth centuries that we must turn for projective                   perceived. Now between the eye and the lute place a
geometry’s beginnings. The discovery of perspective                    screen. The rays from the eye to the lute are intercepted
brought about the extraordinary transition in painting from            by the screen, forming a “perspective” view of the lute
two to three dimensions. We need only compare the spatial              on the screen, as Dürer shows us. Here we have the key
arrangement and composition of medieval paintings by                   construction of projective geometry: projection from a
such artists as Giotto, Duccio, and Simone Martini to                  center (the eye) and section by a plane (the screen). In the
those of works by Dürer and Leonardo to realize that                   process we have “transformed’’ the object, that is, created
before 1500 space, size, and composition obeyed spiritual              an image by identifying each point on the screen with
or symbolic laws, not the physical laws of perspective.                each point on the lute. This is the mathematical definition
    With the discovery of perspective is born the basis                of a “point transformation.” By tipping the screen or
for projective geometry. Dürer’s 1525 woodcut, “The                    moving the center of projection, an enormous range of
Designer of the Lute,” shows clearly the fundamental                   transformations becomes possible. We can also take the
operation of projection and section so central to projective           screen as a new object and transform it in the same way by
geometry (figure 2). To assist us in understanding this                a second transformation, placing a second screen between
construction, let us imagine that “visual rays” are emitted            the first one and the center of projection. The business
from the eye. The object before us, in this case the lute,             of projective geometry is to investigate the laws of the
                                                                                patterns that arise in space through a series of such
                                                                                transformations.
                                                                                     When confronted by the whirl of movement
                                                                                that projective transformations entail, it may
                                                                                seem difficult to imagine any stable ground or
                                                                                lawfulness. However, by making the transition
                                                                                slowly from the simple transformations associated
                                                                                with ordinary Euclidean geometry to the far more
                                                                                general ones of projective geometry, we can be
                                                                                led to experience an element of order that persists
                                                                                throughout.
                                                                                     As the following discussion will show, a
                                                                                triangle projected onto a surface can assume many
                                                                                different triangular forms, depending on the angle
                                                                                of its projection. Yet certain properties will remain
                                                                                unchanged. The straight lines that compass the
Figure 2. Woodcut by Albrecht Dürer illustrates the principle of projection     triangle, for instance, will always reappear as
and section. In the woodcut the artist marks the points at which the rays       straight lines. Thus is “straightness” one of the
from the eye to the lute intersect the screen.                                  invariants, or unchanging elements, of projective
                                                                 19
geometry. What other elements exist such that “in                      triangle, not only lengths, but angles too were invariant.
changing they find repose”? By pursuing this question                  We then allowed the lengths of the sides to vary, yet
we come not only to the stable ground of geometry, the                 only in such a way that all the angles remain the same.
laws of space that govern projective transformations,                  In other words, the sides all grew simultaneously. Now
but also to a special set of forms, some of which will be              we will change angles as well as size, thus entering
startlingly familiar.                                                  the realm of “affine geometry.” We can do this by
     To learn how these special forms arise, we must                   replacing our original triangle with one of rubber. Such
first bring geometry into motion, for only against the                 deformations occur constantly in nature. Consider a
backdrop of incessant change does the concept of repose,               stream of water. If you could enclose a portion of a brook
or “invariance,” gain meaning. Imagine you have before                 in an imaginary flexible cube, then the cube, through
you a triangular piece of paper. It can be slid easily about           which the brook flows, would tip and stretch because the
the tabletop to assume any number of positions. The                    water nearer the brook bed moves more slowly. D’Arcy
accompanying figure shows three such positions (figure                 Thompson often uses such transformations as these in his
3). To move from one to the other I can push the triangle              On Growth and Form.
up and to the right, and then rotate it. If I take my ruler,                And so we may continue our pursuit of ever
I find the corresponding sides of the triangles are still of           more flexible transformations. Though not obvious,
the same lengths. My protractor likewise shows that the                certain invariants remain, even in this last class of
corresponding angles are of unchanged magnitudes. The                  transformations. It is rather remarkable, for instance,
triangles are, as Euclid would say, congruent. Neither                 that under these transformations a set of parallel lines
length nor angle has changed in the process I have just                is transformed into another set of parallel lines—all the
described. Formally, one would say that lengths and                    more astonishing when we remember that the angles
angles are “invariant” under translations and rotations.               between intersecting lines may change in general.
Here we discover one kind of motion, by noticing that                  One may state the invariance in another way. In plane
lengths and angles remain unchanged.                                   geometry, two lines intersect at one point, unless the
                                                                       lines are parallel. We may overcome the exceptional
                                                                       character of parallel lines by defining a new “ideal”
                                                                       point, namely the point at infinity. Since under affine
                                                                       transformations, a set of parallel lines remains parallel,
                                                                       then the point at infinity remains a point at infinity. In
                                                                       projective geometry, even this invariant disappears.
                                                                       Infinitely distant elements can be brought into the finite
                                                                       by a projective transformation. We can easily see how
                                                                       this occurs in the next set of figures.
                                                                  20
     Imagine our ever-ready triangle as standing upright                 Path curves can be seen as arising in the following
on a plane surface (figure 4). A small light bulb illumines         way. Recall our discussion of Dürer’s drawing of the lute.
the triangle, casting a shadow onto the plane. The shadow           I commented there that we could take the screen as a new
we call a “projection” of the triangle onto the plane. The          object and project it onto another plane or screen by means
apex A of the triangle is projected to A1. But notice what          of a second projective transformation. Clearly there is no
happens if the light is lowered. The apex of the shadow             end to the number of times such an operation could be
triangle recedes farther and farther, until it vanishes into        repeated, the new screen now becoming the object.
the infinite horizon. The finite has become infinite. In                 Now imagine three lines forming a triangle drawn onto
projective geometry, we replace the light bulb with its             a thin glass plate; several points around the perimeter of
mathematical analog, a center of projection. By lowering            the triangle are carefully marked with blue dots (figure 5).
the center of projection, the apex can be made not only             Some distance above the glass plate is a small lamp, our
to recede to infinity, but even to return again from the            center of projection. We imagine the shadow to fall on a
other side! It is as if passing to infinity in one direction        second, cleverly fabricated glass plate, which turns black
brought one back from the opposite. Such is the nature              exactly where the shadow falls and produces blue dots at
of a projective transformation. With it we attain a very            the proper corresponding points. We have just performed
high order of freedom, yet even here there are properties           the fundamental transformation of projective geometry,
and forms that remain unchanged. “Straightness” is one              projection and section. (Whereas in the Dürer drawing, the
of them. Another is the property of “incidence.” That is,           plane is between the object and the center of projection, in
if two lines intersect in a point before transformation,            this instance the object is between the plane and the center
they will intersect in a corresponding point after                  of projection.) Placing the two plates together and looking
transformation. There are still other invariants, but for           through them, we see two triangles, one slightly different
our purposes we can limit our treatment and turn now to             from the other, the degree of difference depending on the
Sophus Lie, in whose work the idea of invariance meets              particulars of the projection and section. If the second
with that of form in space, the heart of our considerations.        plate was very close to the first, then the difference
                                                                    can be small indeed. Thus one has two triangles in one
                                                                    plane. Mathematicians formalize the process by saying
                                                                    that the first plane and the second are united after the
                                                                    transformation.
                                                                         The process can be repeated with the object plate,
                                                                    image plate, and projecting lamp all situated exactly as
                                                                    before. The image plate is now projected. After the planes
                                                                    are united, three triangles appear, each with its set of
                                                                    blue dots. By repeating the process over and over, many
                                                                    triangles appear, all with blue dots. The mathematician
                                                                    would say that we have transformed the plane onto
                                                                    itself many times via a series of identical projective
                                                                    transformations. Now forget the triangles and attend only
                                                                    to the blue dots. They will form a set of curves. Following
                                                                    the trajectory of one of the dots, a point in a plane, we
                                                                    have been led to a path curve. Although we have chosen
                                                                    to watch only a few blue dots, clearly all the points of
                                                                    the plane are brought into movement by the series of
                                                                    projective transformations. Transforming the plane onto
Figure 5.                                                           itself has produced path curves. They are forms of the
    Nearly one hundred years ago Lie presented a                    plane, structures that remain unchanged throughout the
systematic discussion of a special set of curves in two             movement. By changing the angle of projection, we could
dimensions, which he termed Bahncurven or “path                     arrive at a different series of projective transformations
curves.” These curves, and the analogous surfaces in three          and a different set of path curves.
dimensions, possess the remarkable property of remaining                 If we considered the entire plane, we would find that
unchanged when acted upon by repeated application of a              three and only three points never move at all. They are
projective transformation.
                                                               21
completely invariant.2 All other points move along path
curves that cross only at the three invariant points of the                Let us begin with the bud of the wood sorrel
plane. We can watch the points of a path curve march                  (Oxaliacetosella), which gives forth its small white
dutifully along behind one another, never deviating from              flower during midsummer. By carefully collecting
their designated path, as if moving through the veins of              several samples, mounting them for photography,
some organism. The whole plane is in movement. Yet                    and enlarging the prints, we can make very exact
within the flux, there abides form: The pattern of path               measurements of the bud shape in profile. In constructing
curves does not evolve, although every aspect and point               the corresponding path curve, we find that by placing two
of the plane (save three) are in motion! One cannot help              of the invariant points at the upper and lower poles of
noticing the kinship between such form within movement                the bud and following an exact mathematical procedure,
in geometry and the similar biological phenomenon.                    we can determine the path curve that best fits the wood
Every human cell is replaced within a seven-year span, yet            sorrel bud. This can be done for many wood sorrel buds
our countenance remains, in all essentials, unchanged. The            at the same stage of development, regardless of size.
beauty apparent in the contemplation of these concepts                The agreement between the pure mathematical form and
and forms quickly wins the heart of anyone with the least             the living one is striking. Perhaps the most immediately
affection for the elegance of pure mathematics.                       convincing evidence is found in the simple visual
     While far more difficult to imagine, an entirely                 comparison of an ideal path curve with the actual form
analogous procedure can be followed in three dimensions.              of the bud. Often the difference is little more than the
In this case, surfaces as well as curves fill out space with          width of a pencil line—well within the precision with
forms. These are the invariant forms of space, invariant,             which one can make reliable measurements on these frail
that is, under repeated applications of an identical                  little buds. Not all species follow path curve forms so
projective transformation. It is just these dynamic yet               perfectly, but in over eighty percent of the cases studied,
invariant path curve forms that we shall discover around              the plant buds are found to reflect path curve geometry
us in the plant and animal kingdoms.                                  with remarkable fidelity.
     Path curves present a rich variety of spatial forms.                  Correspondences can be found elsewhere in the
These include egg shapes, cones, and vortices (figure 6).             living world. The spiral tendency of leaves on a stem has
Using a particular mathematical procedure, one can assign             long engaged botanical and mathematical researchers.
a number, called lambda, the Greek letter l, to each shape            Similar spiral configurations are to be seen in pine
that appears. For instance, positive values between zero              cones and in bud formations, in the way petals arrange
and infinity are associated with various egg-shaped path              themselves around the bud center. It turns out that the
curves. Negative values give all the vortex forms. The                path curve surfaces of the bud are themselves covered
forms so created on the geometer’s drawing table bear a               with a spiral pattern, each spiral being a path curve. Very
striking resemblance to certain forms in nature. Lawrence             often one can capture the gesture of these spiral patterns
Edwards starts with the question: Is this resemblance                 by suitable path curve analysis. Such agreement seems
merely superficial, or does a genuine correspondence                  unlikely to occur by chance, for it can be found in many
exist?
     During twenty years of research, Edwards has
explored the kinship between path curves and natural
forms as diverse as pine cones, plant buds, eggs, the
human heart, and developing embryos. The results of his
research and his reflection on their meaning are summed
up in his recent book, The Field of Form. In it he tells
of the blind alleys into which he wandered but also of
the moments of excitement when he saw clearly how
transformations of projective geometry touch the earth and
gather up substance to clothe their forms. We will inquire
into only two of his findings, those concerning plant buds            Figure 6. Path curve forms in three dimensions resemble
and the human heart. With them the beauty of his work                 egglike/vorlexlike figures, depending on the manner of their
                                                                      construction. The examples shown here represent path curve
will become apparent.                                                 forms differing only in the important mathematical parameter,
____________________________
2. The basis of this statement can be shown mathematically but        lambda (l). If l = 1.2, the form is round and egglike. As l
is too complex to present within the confines of this article.        increases, the form becomes sharper and blunter at its ends.
                                                                      Negative values of l produce vortex forms.
                                                                 22
Figure 7. The solid lines represent tracings of the actual living form of the ventricle as detected by an X-ray procedure. The broken
lines illustrate the path curve forms calculated to fit the actual forms. During one full heart cycle (of about 0.8 seconds’ duration), the
path curve forms change dramatically and reveal a rhythmic sevenfold process.
The left ventricle of the human heart at the moment of full diastole or relaxation (left).
other biological forms, including that of the heart.                         One of Edwards’s most dramatic accomplishments
     The heart in animal or man can be thought of as the                must surely be his study of the living human heart, made
perfect or archetypal muscle. Other muscles may be                      possible through a kind of X-ray moving picture. Every
seen as variations of this central organ, whose whole                   fiftieth of a second an X-ray image was taken of the
existence is ceaseless rhythmic activity. Beginning                     beating heart. The technique provided a picture of the
with the detailed studies of the heart made by Scottish                 inside surface of the heart, the innermost of Pettigrew’s
anatomist J. Bell Pettigrew in his book Design in Nature,               seven layers (figure 7). Edwards followed the changing
Lawrence Edwards worked to uncover the path curve                       form of the heart throughout the duration of a pulse and
form of the heart. In this instance, not only was the outer             found that the movement from full expansion to full
form of the heart significant, but so were the particular               contraction is in itself a rhythmic sevenfold process, one
circling patterns made by the several layers of muscle                  beautifully revealed through his path curve analysis.
that together comprise the heart. Pettigrew distinguished                    So far we have seen a remarkable congruence
seven layers. Moving from the outermost inward, the                     between those forms inwardly created by the human
muscle patterns change from a left-handed to a right-                   mind, that is, path curves, and the tangible forms of
handed spiral at the fourth layer. In addition, the left                plant bud and heart. Lawrence Edwards has made
ventricle, which Pettigrew terms the “heart of the heart,”              preliminary studies in several other directions, but we
changes its form as one moves from layer to layer.                      must leave these aside for want of space. Of much
Would it prove possible to follow these changing forms                  greater importance is his discovery of what he terms
as one moved inward? Indeed, by changing the positions                  the “pivot transformation,” which relates forms in
of the invariant points, the slightly asymmetric form of                space to those of a complementary realm, one that is
the heart can be geometrically                                                                       sometimes called counterspace.
reproduced. The form of the                                                                          I shall conclude by spending
left ventricle also proved                                                                           a few moments considering
possible of capture in a path                                                                        the general character and
curve. Even the spiral gesture                                                                       significance of these ideas for
of the muscle layers, like the                                                                       the understanding of plant
spiral of the wood sorrel bud,                                                                       forms.
finds its expression in path                                                                             When visualizing a
curves, as a second set of                                                                           circle, we tend to see it as a
curves that cover the surface.      Figure 8. Pointwise Circle       Figure 9. Linewise Circle       continuous curve formed of
                                                                   23
points all equally distant from the circle’s center. The              one point to another, or a line to a line, Edwards uses those
circle is formed from the center out, point by point (figure          projective transformations that transform a point to a line,
8). It is initially surprising to learn that there is a second        or a point to a plane.
means of forming a circle. We must free ourselves from                    Such transformations immediately call to mind what
the habit of thinking of points as somehow more primary               the quantum physicist David Bohm termed “the implicate
than the line. For in this other view, it is just the line,           order,” wherein the entirety of a line can be“enfolded”
and not the point, that is used to generate a circle. The             into a point. In such instances the relationship between the
construction can easily be understood by visualizing one              whole and the part is clearly unusual, for the whole is in
line after the next as touching a circle. The set of lines has        the part, the line is in the point!
thereby created a tangent envelope that also completely                   We cannot delve here into the complexities of
defines the circle (figure 9). If we generalize still further         counterspatial geometry. Suffice it to say that once we
to three dimensions, the infinitely extensive, unitary, and           have explored its properties mathematically, we are free
undivided plane becomes the generative entity of space.               to move between space and counterspace, between point
Thus is the sphere formed no longer of points equidistant             and line, by means of Edwards’s pivot transformation. Can
from a given point. Rather, planes shape the sphere, just             this possibility be exploited in the study of organic forms?
as the sculptor shapes his clay with the flat of his hand. So         Lawrence Edwards saw the means for doing so. Working
may the infinitely many planes of space fashion geometric             with the hip of the wild rose, he was able to discover the
forms from the periphery inward. It becomes possible to               beautiful “plane-wise” vortex that stands in counterspace
imagine a new kind of space, a “counterspace,” wherein                behind it. Moreover, the character of the pivot
point becomes plane.                                                  transformation is such that the bud of the wild rose (itself
                                                                      a path curve) mediates the transformation from vortex to
                                                                      hip (figure 10). Thus are all three elements—bud, hip, and
                                                                      vortex—brought into a harmonious interrelationship. Other
                                                                      plant species show similar fidelity to the geometric forms
                                                                      generated from his counterspatial vortex.
                                                                          The discovery of the counterspatial vortex as he
                                                                      describes it in his book, is a grand moment to rehearse
                                                                      with Mr. Edwards. Through it he seems to approach the
                                                                      nature of life itself. And now the full strength of projective
                                                                      geometry becomes clear. In addition to providing
                                                                      transformations that are highly mobile, it establishes,
                                                                      through the development of counterspace, a new
                                                                      relationship between the whole and the part.
                                                                 24
    In his work, Edwards is not only concerned with                 Suggested reading:
describing mathematically the natural forms he studies,
but also tries to find the origins of these forms. He has           On Growth and Form, W. D’Arcy Thompson, abridged
not, as do most contemporary researchers, sought to                 edition, John T. Bonner, editor, Cambridge: Cambridge
find them through molecular biology, but instead by                 University Press, 1961.
developing a science of form. When reading about what
he terms “fields of form,” one is reminded of the great             The Field of Form, Lawrence Edwards, Edinburgh:
English physicist Michael Faraday, developer of the field           Floris Books, 1982.
concept. The fields in Edwards’s work, however, are
conceived not as physical forces but as insensible, ideal           The Geometry of Life, Lawrence Edwards, New York:
forms that are nevertheless imaged in the tangible shapes           Proceedings, The Myrin Institute, in press.
of the living world. He is convinced, as was Goethe,
that nature creates her infinite forms according to a plan,         The Plant between Sun and Earth, George Adams and
according to an Idea. Goethe wrote: “The Idea is eternal            Olive Whicher, Boulder, Colorado: Shambhala,1982.
and unitary .... All that of which we become aware and of
which we can speak are only manifestations of the Idea.”            “Projective Geometry,” Morris Kline, Scientific
The Idea is not to be identified with a purely material             American, Volume 192 (1), pages 80–86, 1955.
or molecular basis—the building blocks of life. Rather,
we should attend to the forms themselves. In writing                Elementary Mathematics from an “Advanced Standpoint:
of biology, Aristotle made use of an analogy, that of a             Geometry,” Felix Klein, New York: Dover Publications,
house:                                                              1948.
   The object of architecture is not bricks, mortar,                The Waldorf Science Newsletter was given permission to
   or timber, but the house; and so the principal                   print by the author. The article was first printed in Orion
   object of natural philosophy is not the material                 Magazine, from whom permission was also obtained.
   elements, but their composition, and the                         www.orionmagazine.org.
   totality of form, independently of which they
   have no existence.                                               Arthur Zajonc is associate professor of physics at
                                                                    Amherst College, where he teaches physics and the
    Lawrence Edwards has attended to the composition                history of science. His research interests include laser
and form of organic nature as few before him and has                spectroscopy and atomic physics.
shown that through careful observation of nature and the
free activity of human thinking, the Ideas that seem to
touch nature may also unfold in the human mind. When
Kepler brought forth the great laws of planetary motion,
he said he had stolen the golden vessels of Egypt. Kepler
heard through these geometric laws the harmony of
the spheres, and his decades of labor were requited.
Lawrence Edwards shares Kepler’s vision of the world
as created and formed according to an image, fashioned
not simply by a field of forces, but rather in accord with a
“field of form.”
                                                               25
                   Phenomenology:
 Husserl’s Philosophy and Goethe’s Approach to Science
                                                           by
                                                     Michael Holdrege
Introduction
                                                                  extensa).
    It may seem surprising that Goethe’s scientific meth-
                                                                       Husserl saw clearly that once a distinction between
od and the philosophy of Edmund Husserl, which was
                                                                  mind and nature is posited, the question must inevitably
developed half a century after Goethe’s death, would be
                                                                  arise as to how the two are related. He considered the
grouped under the same heading: phenomenology. To
                                                                  shift in focus that this question brought with it had led
show the justification for this and to outline the nature
                                                                  modern philosophy—beginning with Descartes—down
of the profound project that Goethe and Husserl shared
                                                                  an unproductive path of inquiry. In his quest to establish
will be the task of this article.
                                                                  a firm, irrefutable foundation for knowledge, Descartes
                                                                  (1968) had employed the “method of doubt,” which
Husserl’s Phenomenology and the Cartesian Split                   involved rejecting all previous opinions that allowed for
     Husserl saw his phenomenology as addressing a                even the slightest incertitude. Through this process of
crisis that faced the western sciences. In his last great         methodologically doubting, Descartes was led to ques-
work, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcen-               tion even the apparent reality of the physical world and
dental Phenomenology, Husserl spoke of how positivis-             his own body. The only certainty that remained for him
tic science—blinded by the prosperity it produced—had             was that he, the doubter, existed: Cogito, ergo sum (I
reduced the idea of science to a focus on purely factual          think, therefore I am). From this point of certainty, Des-
data. This form of scientific endeavor, he maintained,            cartes then deduced the necessary existence of a perfect
turns away in indifference from the questions that are            God, who—because perfect—would not deceive him.
decisive for a genuine humanity. All valuative ques-              Therefore, the reality of the eternal world as it appeared
tions, questions of the meaning or meaninglessness                to him must be guaranteed.1 Nonetheless, two distinct
of human existence, were banned from the realm of                 worlds still presented themselves to Descartes. First,
scientific endeavor. According to Husserl, this form of           there is the res cogitans: the thinking dimension that one
science “strives for and achieves nothing but ‘theoria’.          perceives within and which can be known with inner
In other words, man becomes a nonparticipating specta-            certainty. Entirely separate and fundamentally different
tor, surveyor of the world” (Husserl 1970, p 285).                from this is the res extensa—the extended substance: the
    Husserl’s efforts to return science to “the things            outer “objective” world of the physical universe (Des-
themselves” were held by many to be so significant that           cartes 1968; Husserl 1970, 1982; Tarnas 1991; Brady
the historian of philosophy Hans Stoerig—speaking in              1998).
the late 1970s—called Husserl one of the two most in-                 Using Galileo’s distinction between primary and sec-
fluential philosophers of the 20th century (Stoerig 1978).        ondary qualities, Descartes concluded that the scientist
After all, Husserl’s work had a fundamental impact                should not rely on the qualitative secondary qualities
on such prominent philosophers as Heidegger, Sartre,              (color, sound, taste, etc.) that are merely manifestations
Recoeur, Scheler, Gadamer and Merleau-Ponty. Central
                                                                  1. It should be noted that with the deduction of a perfect God
to Husserl’s project was the overcoming of the split              who would not deceive him, Descartes fell back into the same
erected by Descartes between our inner life of mind (res          medieval practice of deductive reasoning that he was attempt-
cogitans) and the outer world of extended things (res             ing to overcome.
                                                             26
of the “subjective” organization of our senses (as part of          Although it was Thomas Kuhn’s now famous book on
the res cogitans), but should address only those primary            The Structure of Scientific Revolutions that brought the
qualities (duration, shape, number, extension) that can             decisive paradigm shift in the philosophy of science to
be analyzed quantitatively and “objectively” because                general awareness,3 the approach of Yale philosophy pro-
they belong to the outer world of the res extensa. This             fessor N. R. Hanson4 relates more directly to the context
assertion of the essential dichotomy between thinking               of this article. Hanson’s often quoted words that “there is
substance and extended substance (between secondary                 more to seeing than meets the eye” encapsulate a central
and primary qualities, respectively) led to the ordain-             theme in his analysis of the nature of perception. In Pat-
ing of mechanics—a form of inquiry permeated with                   terns of Discovery (1958), for example, Hanson discusses
mathematics and based on the “eternal” testing through              the familiar Perspe cube (Figure 1).
experiment of the “internally developed” hypothesis—as
the primary form of scientific endeavor by which the
physical universe could be understood (Descartes 1968;
Husserl 1970, 1982; Tarnas 1991; Brady 1998).
    Husserl (1970) considered this dualistic basis for
modern science to be naïve, particularly if one took into
account Kant’s analysis of sense perception as developed
in his Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1781). In this work,
Kant argued that our experience of the sense world is not
actually based on direct sense perception alone. The ob-
jects of experience point to a hidden mental accomplish-
ment of which we are normally not aware. According
to Kant’s analysis, we do not passively receive sensory
input, but actively integrate and structure it. Once this is
realized, Galileo’s so-called primary qualities no longer
appear to be so “objective”; they cannot be abstracted
from the formulaic activity of the mind and thus do not
“stand alone” (Kant 1781, 1783; Kemp 1968; Husserl                       Hanson asks if all individuals who see this figure—
1970; Tarnas 1991; Brady 1998).                                     and who, if they are requested to, are able to produce
    This insight did not escape modern philosophers of              essentially identical drawings of this figure—actually
science (Brown 1977), even if they addressed the ques-              see the same thing. Although the tiny inverted images
tion of the theory-laden nature of perception quite dif-            on each viewer’s retina will be virtually the same, some
ferently from Kant. Before considering Husserl’s funda-             will see it viewed from above, others from below, and
mental concept of intentionality—which provides a way               still others as a kind of polygon-like gem. A fourth group
of avoiding the Cartesian/Galilean conundrum—a brief                might see only lines criss-crossing in a plane, and so on.
look at one of the key contributors to the “new view” of            Using many examples of this sort (such as Koehler’s
science will be helpful.                                            famous “Goblet and Faces” drawing, Toulouse-Lautrec’s
                                                                    old and young woman picture, etc.), Hanson makes clear
N. R. Hanson and the New View of Science	                           that—although nothing essential changes at the level of
                                                                    optics or physiology—people see different things! What
    Science in the first half of the 20th century was
                                                                    changes is not the sensory data as such, but the organiza-
dominated by logical empiricists, who saw the system
                                                                    tion of what one sees. Organization is not an element in
of postulates that made up a theory as hovering freely
                                                                    the visual field, however; it itself is not seen as are lines
above the plane of empirical facts, whereas these facts—
                                                                    or colors. In a related sense, Hanson points out, the plot
since they could be known independently of any theory
—guaranteed the objectivity of science (Brown 1977).                3. Amrine (1998) remarks that the influence of Kuhn’s book
Beginning in the 1950s, this view came under sustained              was so profound that one is tempted to divide the history of the
                                                                    philosophy of science in B.K. and A.K.—“before Kuhn” and
attack by a diverse group of philosophical thinkers.2
                                                                    “after Kuhn.”
2. N. R. Hanson, Michael Polanyi, Stephen Toulmin, Paul Fey-        4. Hanson—in the words of Amrine (1998)—“fired the open-
erabend and Thomas Kuhn wrote pivotal works that founded            ing shot” in this revolution with his classic work Patterns of
this new approach (Brown 1977).                                     Discovery, 1958.
                                                               27
is not another detail in a story, nor is the melody merely               conscious of something, it can no more doubt of what it
one more note in a song. Yet in the absence of plots and                 is conscious than it can doubt that it is conscious. The
melodies, the elements of a story and the notes of a song                indivisible unity between the conscious mind and that of
would not hang together. In a similar manner, the organiz-               which it is conscious overcame for Husserl the Cartesian
ing activity that lets the cube become a cube cannot to                  bifurcation. The dualist dilemma that had faced western
be seen. The following words of Charles Babbage (1830,                   philosophy ever since Descartes was thus not to be over-
cited in Hanson 1958, p 184) illustrate vividly how this                 come by eliminating one of the two categories—subject
influences the process of scientific research:                           or object, mind or body—but by recognizing that that
                                                                         distinction itself6—even if it informs every individual’s
    An object is frequently not seen from not knowing                    daily experience—is problematical. Husserl recognized
    how to see it, rather than from any defect in the                    that every cogito intends a cogitatum.7 Consciousness
    organ of vision…[Herschel said] I will prepare                       itself is unified, although within this unity two poles
    the apparatus, and put you in such a position that                   can be identified, the cogito and its content (Stewart and
    [Fraunhofer’s dark lines] shall be visible, and yet                  Mickunas 1974; Brady 1998; Husserl 1999).
    you shall look for them and not find them: after                          Even though experiences can be of very different
    which, while you remain in the same position, I                      kinds, Husserl demanded that each experience be taken
    will instruct you how to see them, and you shall                     in its own right as it presents itself to consciousness (as
    see them, and not merely wonder you did not see                      it shows itself). Husserl’s phenomenological method
    them before, but you shall find it impossible to                     expanded the meaning of “experience” beyond sense ex-
    look at the spectrum without seeing them.                            perience alone to include anything of which one is con-
                                                                         scious. We can be aware of many different things, such
    Different ways of seeing lead to different scientific re-            as mathematical entities, natural objects, moods, feel-
sults. In Hanson’s understanding, then, we must recognize                ings, values, desires and much else. Husserl called such
that all observation undertaken in the name of science                   experiences phenomena and saw phenomenology as the
is “theory-laden.” This was the fundamental insight that                 systematic investigation of the content of consciousness.
led to a revolution in the philosophy of science (Hanson                 This project required an awareness, however, that differ-
1958; Brown 1977; Brady 1998; Amrine 1998). This                         ent kinds of content—such as mathematics and values,
insight that eternal reality can no longer be understood as              for example—have different kinds of reality, none of
divorced from the mind also provided Husserl (decades                    which are reducible to the others. Husserl considered
before) with a starting point free from the Cartesian split.5            anything of which one is conscious to represent a legiti-
                                                                         mate field of inquiry, and that each phenomenon must be
                                                                         taken as it is, without imposing upon it a methodology
Husserl and Intentionality                                               taken from elsewhere that is inappropriate to that par-
    Although Husserl emphasized the role that conscious-                 ticular subject matter. It would be nonsense, for example,
ness plays in “constituting” the world, he did not con-                  to investigate mathematical questions by the same means
clude with Kant that beyond the—from consciousness                       that one investigates creatures such as birds and bees,
co-shaped—phenomenal world, there exists a deeper                        or feelings such as affection. The acts of consciousness
level of reality—the thing-in-itself (the Ding-an-sich)—                 and their objects are very different in all these cases8
which is unknown and unknowable to us. Husserl was
able to avoid such dualism, as well as the Cartesian ver-                6. In everyday life, we do not notice the organizing activity of
                                                                         our intentionality. We bring to consciousness only the results
sion, with the help of one central concept: intentionality.              of that activity—“I see the Perspe cube from below”—rather
Consciousness, as Husserl had learned from his teacher,                  than the act of composition itself. Although my internal act
Franz Brentano, is always directed toward an object—it                   does not create the perception of the cube—I cannot see it as
is consciousness of…. For Husserl, this consciousness                    a sphere, for example—it shapes it from a particular point of
was inseparable from its object and hence not solely                     view.
“a thinking thing” (res cogita) as it was for Descartes.                 7. “[T]he word intentionality signifies nothing else than
                                                                         this universal fundamental property of consciousness: to be
Since consciousness always has an object, is always                      conscious of something; as a cogito, to bear within itself its
                                                                         cogitatum” (Husserl 1999, p 33).
5. It is also fundamental for an understanding of Goethe and             8. It would go beyond the scope of this paper to explore the
the way in which he attempted to “organize” his perceptual               method of “phenomenological reduction,” or “bracketing,”
activity so that it harmonized with (corresponded to) the kind of        that Husserl applied to the pre-philosophical “natural
phenomena he was studying.
                                                                    28
(Husserl 1962; Stewart and Mickunas 1974). A rigorous                   his views on morphology,9 as well as one way that his
science in Husserl’s sense would, then, pay close atten-                scientific approach can be applied to the study of plant
tion to the kind of thinking (organizing activity) that it              life.
applies to various realms of phenomena. Its goal would                      Goethe recognized the value of a detailed analysis
be to find a close fit (correspondence) between the phe-                of the anatomy and chemical make-up of living organ-
nomena under examination and the intentional activity                   isms, but was convinced that a one-sided emphasis in
that beholds and investigates them.                                     this direction (an exclusive application of this form of in-
                                                                        tentionality) made one blind to that which distinguishes
Goethe’s Phenomenological Approach                                      the living from the nonliving—in particular the fact that
                                                                        within an organism the totality is active in every organ.
    Husserl’s double perspective that a) takes the phe-
                                                                        This is evident at death, when this all-parts-permeating
nomena seriously as they appear to us—as they show
                                                                        principle disappears and “dis-integration” sets in. Goethe
themselves—and that b) finds for each field of inquiry
                                                                        characterized the one-sided redutionistic approach in
a methodology—a way of thinking—appropriate to it,
                                                                        Faust (1971, verses 1936–1939):
brings us back to Goethe, for whom these two tenets
were fundamental. Goethe’s approach to the natural
world was characterized by Rudolf Steiner, the first edi-                          Who wants the living to know and describe,
tor of Goethe’s natural scientific writings, in the follow-                        Seeks first the spirit from it to drive.
ing way:                                                                           Now has he—indeed—the parts in hand,
                                                                                   Lacks merely—alas—the spiritual band.
    Goethe’s view of the world is the most many-
    sided imaginable. It proceeds from a central                            In Goethe’s view, the overall coherence-creating
    point, which rests in the unified nature of the                     principle within the organism cannot be comprehended
    poet, and it always brings to the fore that side                    by detail-analysis alone. Morphology in his sense in-
    which corresponds to the nature of the object.                      volved shifting one’s intentionality from a predominant-
    The unity of the activity of intellectual forces                    ly analytical (reductionistic) mode to a more synthetic or
    lies in the nature of Goethe; the temporary                         holistic one10 that attempts to grasp the overriding unity
    form of that activity is determined by the object                   of an object as it develops both spatially and temporally.
    concerned. Goethe borrowed his manner of                            For Goethe, the analytic-synthetic contrast was also re-
    observation from the eternal world instead of                       flected in the German expressions Gestalt, which intends
    obtruding his own upon the world. Now, the                          the more fixed and finished final forms of an organism,
    thinking of many men is effectual only in one                       and Bildung, which refers more to the dynamic, forma-
    definite way; it serves only for a certain type of                  tive processes that lead to the fixed Gestalt (Steiner
    object; it is not unified, as was Goethe’s, but only                1968; Naydler 2000).
    uniform… All sorts of errors arise from the fact                        Goethe’s efforts were strongly directed toward de-
    that such a way of thinking, entirely appropriate                   veloping the capacity to apprehend the plant not only in
    to one type of object, is declared to be universal. 	               the spatial jutaposition of its organs, but in the way those
    				                           (Steiner 1968, p 7)                  forms constantly transform—“changing ever, the same
                                                                        forever.” He, himself, put it best:
    Rather than summarizing how Goethe’s many-sided
approach expressed itself in a wide range of phenome-                       In observing objects of Nature, especially those
na—for Goethe’s pioneering work includes studies in the                     that are alive, we often think the best way of gain-
realms of geology, meteorology, anatomy, zoology, and
optics, among others—this paper will briefly consider                   9. Goethe coined the term morphology and is recognized as
                                                                        the founder of modern comparative morphology (Naydler
                                                                        2000).
attitude” that accepts the natural world in an unquestioned             10. This distinction can also be found in the German philoso-
way. The reduction involves calling into question all of one’s          phy of Goethe’s day, which followed Kant in distinguishing
presuppositions about the world. It is reminiscent of Descartes’        the intellect (Verstand), or normal analytical forms of thought,
method of doubt—and is undertaken in a similar spirit—but               from the capacity of reason (Vernunft), which referred to
it leads, in contrast to Descartes’ approach, to a non-dualistic        higher intuitive or synthesizing insight (Steiner 1968; Naydler
phenomena-based relationship to the world (Stewart and                  2000).
Mickunas 1974; Husserl 1982).
                                                                   29
   ing insight into the relationship between their inner              How does such an emphasis on Bildung and dynamic
   nature and the effects they produce is to divide               play itself out when faced with the concrete Gestalt of
   them into their constituent parts. Such an approach            the plant? Instead of demonstrating this using Goethe’s
   may, in fact, bring us a long way toward our goal.             own writings, this paper will employ an example of leaf
   In a word, those familiar with science can recall              metamorphosis typical of the approach developed by Ger-
   what chemistry and anatomy have contributed                    hard Grohmann and Jochen Bockemuehl,11 two pioneer
   toward an understanding and overview of Nature.                practitioners of Goethe’s phenomenological method in the
   But these attempts at division also produce many               latter half of the 20th century.12
   adverse effects when carried to an extreme. To be
   sure, what is alive can be dissected into its compo-
   nent parts, but from these parts it will be impos-
   sible to restore it and bring it back to life….
                                                             30
schema—that reveals much about the entire series. Even                cutting off an individual leaf from the plant as a whole
the simplest schema—such as one based on the three-                   results in its withering and death, so does considering
part leaf at the lower right—tells us little about the more           the leaf merely as Gestalt—statically, in isolation—cut
complex forms. If we intend, on the other hand, a con-                it off from its true context: the unfolding sequence out of
tinuous movement from one to the next, then an impres-                which it arises. Attending to the parts of the plant as Bil-
sion of gradual modification arises. By intending a dy-               dung, by contrast, allows the form to be grasped dynami-
namic context for the individual forms, a lawful relation             cally, as a moment in the process of becoming (Steiner
between them becomes apparent. Although the empirical                 1968; Brady 1998).
forms appear separately, we can dissolve that condition
in our minds by shifting our intentional focus from static
                                                                      Conclusion 	
particulars to movement, which allows us to detect a re-
lationship that unites the individual forms. Brady (1987,                 Why does this view of organic nature appear so
p 278) puts an even finer point on this insight by inviting           inaccessible to mainstream scientific thinking? One
the observer to compare two leaves from different zones               reason is certainly that the prevailing mode of scientific
of the series—for example the second and the second to                observation arose historically in the realm of physics,
last leaves—in isolation. Seen side-by-side they appear               which calls for a different form of intentionality than that
quite dissimilar. On the other hand, if one moves through             suited to the organic world. Since the advent of modern
the series “backward and forward” until it becomes a                  science, the focus of most researchers has been on that
continuous movement—as Goethe (1949, p 35) would                      which has already become (Gestalt), a level of existence
have done—then a relationship becomes apparent                        well suited for investigation with analytic thought forms.
despite significant differences between the individual                The form of intentionality that this entails is firmly
leaves. The separate leaves now appear to us as different             anchored in the mindset of the modern age—it signifies a
phases of one dynamic series (Brady 1987).13                          deep-seated habit in our way of engaging Nature. A way
                                                                      of thinking that is better suited to grasping transforma-
    Further reflection reveals that although the individual
                                                                      tion and change in a holistic manner is still—almost 160
forms provide the basis for intending the movement
                                                                      years after Goethe’s passing—quite new and unusual to
between them, they themselves cannot produce the
                                                                      us. Moreover, it requires significantly more intentional
movement—for no individual Gestalt as such is able
                                                                      effort. The willingness to make this effort will first arise,
to generate the transformation to the next form. On the
                                                                      I believe, when the role that our own consciousness
other hand, the intended movement is able to reveal a
                                                                      plays in the coming into being of perceptual experience
unity within the individual forms that is not apparent
                                                                      is more widely seen and appreciated.13 For that reason,
when they are viewed statically. One grasps the individ-
                                                                      Husserl and Goethe belong together. What Goethe devel-
ual Gestalt as something like a frozen moment (in space)
                                                                      oped through the concrete study of Nature—in the field,
of a process of becoming (Bildung) that unfolds over
                                                                      so to speak—received a significant foundation through
time. When forms are intended in this dynamic way, they
                                                                      Husserl’s efforts to overcome Cartesian/Galilean dual-
are no longer independent and complete in themselves.
                                                                      ism.14 Husserl’s insights into the nature of intentionality
Every form calls for a preceding form and for one that
                                                                      provide the foundation for a differentiated phenomeno-
follows—a before from which it arises and an after into
                                                                      logical understanding of the world as it “shows itself”
which it develops. Each individual leaf (Gestalt) finds its
                                                                      to human consciousness. It provides the groundwork for
full expression only through the continuous transforma-
                                                                      understanding the significance of Goethe’s “Bildung-
tion of the series. Each image is thus representative of all
                                                                      oriented” approach to the plant world,15 an approach
the others and yet incomplete without them.
    Viewing the plant in this dynamic manner is ap-                   13. Even though Hanson (1958) and others shed a bright light
                                                                      on this relationship over a half century ago, it still appears to
propriate because individual leaves are, in fact, parts of
                                                                      be largely ignored in the day to day practice of the biological
a living whole that—in contrast to the nonliving—pos-                 sciences.
sesses an internal potency for growth and change. What                14. Albeit those investigations were undertaken without any
exists in the seed as mere potential unfolds in space and             direct consideration of Goethe’s approach to natural science.
time when suitable conditions present themselves (light,              15. To reiterate what was said earlier, Goethe’s scientific
water, etc.). Furthermore, the parts of this living whole             method is very differentiated in the sense that it attempts
                                                                      to approach different realms of phenomena with a form of
unfold in a specific sequence. The plant as such is not a
                                                                      intentionality fitting to each. This essay has limited its focus,
finished entity, but a transition of states, one into another.        however, to the plant alone.
Its “way of being” is one of constant becoming. Just as
                                                                 31
that attempts to activate our thinking in a way that is “as
quick and flexible” as the plant that it beholds.
Literature Cited
Amrine F. 1998. The metamorphosis of the scientist. In             Grohmann G. 1974. The Plant. NY: Biodynamic Farming
    Seamon D, Zajonc A, editors. Goethe’s Way of Sci-                   & Gardening Assoc, p 209.
    ence. Albany: State Univ. of New York, pp 33–54.               Hanson N. 1958. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge:
Babbage C. 1830.  Reflections on the Decline of Science                 Cambridge Univ. Press, p 241.
    in England and on Some of Its Causes, London: B.               Husserl E. 1962. Ideas, General Introduction to a Pure
    Fellowes and J. Booth. Cited in Hanson 1958.                        Phenomenology. Transl. Gibson B. New York: Col-
Bortoft H. 1996. The Wholeness of Nature. Hudson, NY:                   lier Books, p 446.
    Lindesfarne Press, p 407.                                      ____________. 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences
Bockemuehl J. 1998. Transformation in the foliage                       and Transcendental Phenomenology. Transl. Carr D.
    leaves of higher plants. In Seamon D, Zajonc A, edi-                Evanston: Northwestern Univ. Press, p 405.
    tors. Goethe’s Way of Science. Albany: State Univ.             ____________. 1999 (12th impression). Cartesian Medi-
    of New York, pp 115–128.                                            tations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. Trans.
Brady R. 1977. Goethe’s natural science. Some non-                      Cairns D. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publication,
    cartesian meditations. In Schaefer K, Hensel H,                     p 157.
    Brady R, editors. Toward a Man-Centered Science.               Kant I. 1781. Kritik der reinen vernunft. Stuttgart: Rec-
    Mount Kisco, NY: Futura Press, pp 137–165.                          lam, p 1011.
____________. 1987. Form and cause in Goethe’s                     ____________. 1783. Prolegomena zu einer jeden
    morphology. In Amrine F, Zucker F, andWheeler H.
                                                                   	    künftigen metaphysik. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Ver-
    Goethe and the Sciences: A Reappraisal. Dordrecht:
                                                                        lag, p 200.
    Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, pp 257–300.
                                                                   Kemp J. 1968. The Philosophy of Kant. NY: Oxford Uni-
____________. 1998. The idea in nature: rereading
                                                                        versity Press, p 130.
    Goethe’s organics. In Seamon D, Zajonc A, editors.
    Goethe’s Way of Science. Albany: State Univ. of                Miller D. 1988. Goethe’s Scientific Studies. NY: Surkamp,
    New York, pp 83–111.                                                p 344.
Brown H. 1977. Perception, Theory and Commitment,                  Naydler J. 2000. Goethe on Science. Edinburgh: Floris
    the New Philosophy of Science. Chicago: Univ. of                    Books, p 141.
    Chicago Press, p 203.                                          Steiner R. 1968. A Theory of Knowledge Based on
Bubner R. 1981. Modern German Philosophy. Cam-                          Goethe’s World Conception. Trans. Wannamaker O.
    bridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. p 223.                               NY: Anthropsophic Press. p 131.
Cassirer E. 1950. The Problem of Knowledge. New Ha-                ____________. 1988. Goethean Science. New York: Mer-
    ven: Yale Univ. Press, p 334.                                       cury Press, p 278.
Descartes R. 1968. Discourse on Method and the Medi-               Stoerig H. 1978. Kleine weltgeschichte der philosophy.
    tations. Trans. Suttcliffe F. London: Penguin, p 188.               Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag, p 713.
Goethe J. 1949. Geschichte meines botanischen studi-               Stewart D. and Mickunas A. 1974. Exploring Phenom-
    um. In Goethes naturwissen-schaftliche schriften.                   enology. Chicago: ALA. p 165.
    Steiner R, editor. Bern: Troler Verlag, pp 61–84.              Tarnas R. 1991. The Passion of the Western Mind, NY:
____________. 1971. Faust. Stuttgart: Phillip Reklam.                   Random House, p 544.
                                                              32
        FIRST APPROACH TO MINERALOGY
by
Frederick Hiebel
                                   Rhodochrysite specimen
                                 from the editor’s collection.
                                     Found in Colorado.
     In one of his lectures, at the opening of the Waldorf School, Rudolf Steiner
told his teachers that the age of twelve is an important turning point in a child’s
development. We have all noticed that just before and at about the age of puberty
children gradually lose their grace of movement. They can become clumsy and
spasmodic in the use of their limbs, their manners and, even their facial expressions.
Their long arms hang awkwardly in sleeves which are always too short. In fact, at
this phase of life, we can say a child is actually under the domination of his bony
structure, his skeleton. Parallel with this physical phenomenon, there awakens within
the child a more independent attitude toward his environment. His judgment of
parents and teachers becomes more critical.
     This is the age at which a child should learn the fundamentals of physics and
approach, for the first time, abstract arithmetic in algebra. It is also at this time,
while under the influence of his own bony structure, that a child can best learn about
the “bony” structure of the earth.
     Nature Study in a Waldorf/Steiner school begins in the fourth grade with “Man
and Animal,” and continues in the fifth with botany. During these two years the
natural science classes, which always keep the human being in the center of his
natural surroundings, work their way closer and closer to the earth until, in the sixth
grade, we reach the study of geology and mineralogy.
     Steiner advised the widest sort of approach toward the study and understanding
of nature as a whole and of minerals in particular. Following his valuable indications
we start with geography, and in close connection with geographical teaching the
children learn to discriminate between a primitive mountain range (granite) and a
                                             33
limestone range. For a class in New York City it seems natural to start with a study
of the geological formation of Manhattan’s own granite foundation. The countless
subterranean ‘tunnels’ of the subways and the iron foundations of the highest
buildings on earth are possible only because of the foundation provided by this solid
ground. Even the inner vigor of this city’s inhabitants appears to depend upon these
layers of granite.
     It is important that children should learn and actually grasp the fact that granite
originated from the oldest era of our earth’s development and is for that reason
the firmest and strongest of stone formations. Countless ages ago granite was a
vast mass of fiery-fluid substance which cooled slowly while other rocks formed a
covering over it. During later ages these overlying rocks were destroyed by water
and glaciers until granite appeared as the axis of the highest mountains.
     In telling of these slow, majestic changes the teacher should try to arouse
a feeling of “devotion towards the oldest altar of the world’s creation.” Let the
children dwell upon these words from Goethe.
     The children draw and paint the stages of the earth’s development with pleasure
and a sense of discovery. Through poetry, too, a feeling for the earth’s wonders and
hidden beauties can be brought forward.
     The granite mountains are the products of fiery eruption. The opposite of the
granite mountains are the limestone ranges which were created by sediment, uplift,
and erosion. Fire and water as the primeval forces in the development of our earth’s
surface are understood by children without giving them theories. They seem able to
grasp how creative and divine forces were at work much as in olden times Vulcan
and Neptune were understood when spoken of in connection with the earth’s
development.
     Here is the place for a sketch or diagram of a volcano and the children draw the
different layers of the earth’s surface descending from sandstone, limestone, coal,
devon, gneiss, to granite and the magma—the fiery original foundation of earth.
     We soon find out that our whole subject can be divided into four parts: rocks,
minerals, metals, and gems. Rocks contain many minerals and they in turn are
composed of numerous chemical substances which often contain metals. Minerals
and metals can appear on a higher level of development under the special condition
of crystallization. Crystals and gems are the rarest and noblest forms of the solid
element. And so we lead the children from the description of the rocks and minerals
to that of metals and crystals, stressing the point that within these minerals the
architectural plan of the earth has become far more spiritual and refined than it is in
the crude forms of rocks and minerals.
     As we always try to proceed from the whole to the details, from the original
to the descendants, quartz appears as the primeval phenomenon of all mineral
substances.
                                             34
    		           As honey held within the white-brown wax
    		           Was gathered gladly in the day-long task,
    		           So one day with a hundred thousand suns
    		           Saw quartz, now hid in mountain-deeps, outspun.
    		           Beside sun-radiance of quartz appear
    		           The many other stones but dark and drear.
    		           For this outshines in age and naturewise
    		           What in the other stones imprisoned lies.
    		           It is the oldest child of light, first-born.
    		           Reminding us how blinded we are grown.
     Metals are purified ores. The obvious place to begin this study is with gold, for
gold is the archetype of all metals. In teaching about gold we should never neglect to
speak of the important part gold has played in all legends, fairy stories, and myths,
delved from an age of mankind which we call the Golden Age. Then we speak of the
unique qualities of gold in regard to its malleability, ductility, flexibility, its quality of
being insoluble. We can beat gold as thin as 1/250,000 of an inch. A piece of gold less
than the size of a pinhead can be drawn out into a wire 500 feet long. That is its high
ductility. Finally, it never loses its color and splendor: It does not tarnish.
     We must always find the threads which lead from the human being to the natural
world. When we describe these five qualities of gold which make it the “king” of all
metals, we can draw parallel lines with the five most important qualities inherent in
everyone who wants to become a spiritual “king”—that is, a person who knows first
of all how to lead himself. Can we not apply these five qualities to our inner and moral
self-education in relation to guidance of thoughts, strengthening of will, calmness of
emotions, positiveness in judgment and impartiality towards life? (See the fundamental
writings of Rudolf Steiner.) In the Middle Ages there lived people who ‘searched’ for
gold in this way—the true students of Spiritual Science. They did not want to “make
gold” in the superficial sense of the word, but to develop these five “golden” abilities
for attaining their “spiritual kingdom.” This is the underlying significance of gold in all
fairy stories and legends. To the children, of course, the teacher never mentions these
facts or comparisons in literal form, but this connection must live as an inner impulse
of conviction and enthusiasm within his own mind.
     Such a presentation of the subject, including as it does a moral and uplifting
undercurrent, prevents a one-sided, materialistic idea about gold and, by indirection,
becomes a living force in the child’s mind. It reaches the child through the wisdom of a
trusted teacher, leaving an impression more lasting than would the mere restatement of
fact out of a textbook.
     It is clear that after this the study of silver, copper, and iron is easier. We point out
that historically gold was the first discovered metal. Silver and copper were used later,
and iron does not come into use until the first millennium bc. Iron is the true Roman
metal. Lead was discovered still later than iron (about 500 bc). We may conclude the
study of metals by speaking of one of the very latest, such as radium in connection with
the tremendously mysterious X-rays.
     In the final chapter of our mineralogy, we touch upon crystals and gems. Here
we look at the greatest works of art which the kingdom of the minerals can produce.
Crystals and gems consist of the same products as the rocks and minerals, but in them
the art of building up the earthly element has reached its highest perfection. Crystals
have the most amazing geometrical forms, frozen into stone after an eternal law of the
world. The ancient Greeks said that “God is a geometrician,” and surely crystals and
gems are products of this divine geometry. Does it not seem, in precious stones, as
though the splendor of the stars had been brought down into the earth itself?
                                                35
     Familiar to most of us is the snowflake—the simplest crystal in the making. The
shape of the ice crystal is the hexagonal prism. The Greeks called ice kristallos, and
from this our word crystal is derived. Starting with the crystals of the quartz family
(rock crystal, amethyst, rose quartz), we go on to the garnets and to the corundum
family (pointing to sapphires and rubies, emeralds, and topaz) and finally come to
the diamond—truest archetype of all crystals and gems.
     Diamond is the strongest of all minerals. It cannot be cut by another mineral
for it is 140 times harder than corundum which stands next in hardness. All other
gems consist of two or more chemical substances. The diamond alone contains but
one. When pure carbon, or graphite, crystallizes in the form of an octahedron, the
                                 greatest miracle of transformation takes place—from
                                 the blackest opaque substance to the whitest most
                                 transparent one—the diamond. The diamond, then,
                                 can symbolize the discrimination between good
                                 and evil. We conclude our study of mineralogy by
                                 developing moral and idealistic thoughts on this
                                 phenomenon. We can see in diamonds the pure
                                 splendor of sunlight—as though, in them, the whole
                                 earth had begun to turn toward a future in which its
                                 darkness will be overcome by the power of light.
                                     Mineralogy brings to a close the study of Natural
                                 Science as given in a Waldorf/ Steiner school. It is
  African diamond in matrix      important that we should not terminate such a period
of teaching unless we have given to the children a feeling of true veneration for the
greatness of nature.
                                             36
   “In the Crystals We Recognize the Presence of the Gods.”
                                       37
                       Salt Crystals
Evaporated salt around the Dead Sea, the lowest point on the earth’s landmass
                                     38
                                           Growing Salt Crystals
    Table salt or sodium chloride crystals are simple               salt solution into a clean container (so no undissolved salt
crystals to form if you’ve never grown crystals before.1            gets in), allow the solution to cool, then hang the seed
The ingredients needed are salt and water, the crystals are         crystal in the solution on a pure cotton thread attached to
non-toxic, and no special equipment is required.                    a pencil, popsicle stick, or twig balanced across the top of
                                                                    the container. You could cover the container with a coffee
Procedure:                                                          filter if you like.
     Obtain a clean, sterile container like a glass Mason
jar. Heat water to just before it boils and add the water               Set the container in a location where it can remain
carefully to the container until it is 1 to 2 inches from           undisturbed. You are more likely to get a perfect crystal
the top. Next pour salt into the hot water and stir until no        instead of a mass of crystals if you allow the crystal to
more salt will dissolve. (A white scale will appear at the          grow slowly (cooler temperature, shaded location) in a
bottom of the container. These are minute crystals upon             place free of vibrations.
close observation.)
                                                                         Tips: Experiment with different types of table salt.
     If you want crystals quickly, you can dip a piece of           Try iodized salt, uniodized salt, sea salt, or even Epsom
cardboard into this supersaturated salt solution and allow          salt. Try using different types of water, such as tap water
it to soak. Once it is soggy, place it on a plate or pan and        compared to distilled water. See if there is any difference
set it in a warm and sunny location to evaporate. Numer-            in the appearance of the crystals.
ous small salt crystals will form.
                                                                         If you are trying for the ‘perfect crystal,’ use
     If you wish to form a larger, perfect cubic crystal,           uniodized salt and distilled water. Impurities in either the
you will want to make a seed crystal. To grow a big crys-           salt, the container or the water can cause dislocation, a
tal from a seed crystal, carefully pour the supersaturated          condition in which new crystals will not stack perfectly
                                                                    on top of previous crystals.
1. For many more examples see The Wonders of Waldorf                                                                       DSM
Chemistry, AWSNA Publications by David Mitchell.
                                                               39
                                 The Beauty of Slime Molds
    Slime molds is a term describing fungus-like                       When they exist scattered about in single cell
organisms that use spores to reproduce. The term conjures          organisms and a chemical signal is secreted into their
up in most of us a gelatinous, viscous fluid that is to be         environment, they are able to respond to the chemical
avoided. It is, in fact, only one stage of the slime mold’s        stimulant, find one another, and assemble together into a
life cycle and is seen mostly with the myxomycetes which           cluster that then acts as one organism.
exist as a macroscopic mold.                                           There exist many myths about slime molds. For
    Slime molds have been found all over the world and             example, traditional Finnish lore describes how malicious
feed on microorganisms that live in any type of dead plant         witches used yellow Fuligo (in Finland called “paranvoi,”
material. For this reason, these organisms are usually             or butter of the familiar) to spoil milk. Also, the giant
found in soil, lawns, and on the forest floor, commonly on         amoeba-like alien that terrorizes the small community
deciduous logs. However, in tropical areas they are also           of Downingtown, Pennsylvania, in the 1958 American
common on inflorescences, fruits and in aerial situations          horror/science-fiction film The Blob might be based on
(e.g., in the canopy of trees). In urban areas, they are           slime molds.
found on mulch or even in the leaf mold in gutters.                    Slime molds have almost no fossil record. Not only do
    Most slime molds are smaller than a few centimeters,           slime molds produce few resistant structures (except for
but some species may reach sizes of up to several square           spores, which are often overlooked or unidentifiable), but
meters and masses of up to 30 grams. Many have striking            they live in moist terrestrial habitats, such as on decaying
colors such as yellow, brown and white.                            wood and fresh cow dung, where their potential for
    I first encountered the form while reading Ernst               preservation is low. A few fossil slime molds have been
Haeckel’s Kunstformen der Natur (Art Forms in Nature),             found in amber (Poinar and Waggoner, 1992).
written in 1904. This fantastic                                        There are more than 500 species of slime molds.
study is profusely illustrated with                                They creep on decaying wood and in moist soil, ingesting
forms he observed, and I was                                       bacteria and decaying vegetation. They help give the
overwhelmed by the geometric                                       forest soil the strong, unique, “earthy,” smell with which
symmetry and profound beauty in                                    we are all familiar.
these simple organisms.                                                The photographs on the next two pages illustrate how
    For example, a plasmoidal                                      beautiful and colorful slime molds are—those organisms,
slime mold involves numerous                                       which are responsible for breaking down forest substances
individual cells attached to                                       into brown rich mass that feeds new growth and renewal.
each other, forming one large
membrane. This “supercell” (a                                                                                            DSM
syncytium) is essentially a bag of
cytoplasm containing thousands of individual nuclei.
                                                              40
41
42
                Mutualism between Elk and Magpies
by Jeff Mitton
     A large herd of elk had settled into Moraine Park              and deliberately.The elk looked more silly than
at Rocky Mountain National Park to bask in the sun                  majestic with a magpie on its head, but the elk was
of an early-spring afternoon. They sat motionless                   probably more concerned with its ticks than with
except for their ears, which they flicked constantly.               my opinion of its appearance.Two more magpies
Something was bothering their ears. Probably ticks.                 arrived and began foraging on elk. One magpie
A magpie glided over the herd and landed among the                  started at the head, walked down the elk’s neck and
elk. In a determined manner, it approached a sitting                along the back to stand on the rump, when the elk
elk, hopped onto its flank and continued up onto its                obligingly lifted its tail. The magpie probed the
back, where it paused to survey its surroundings. The               edge of the tail and beneath the tail. No doubt about
elk did not move. The magpie climbed onto the head,                 it, elk and magpies were cooperating to transfer
and the elk remained unperturbed and motionless.                    ticks from the skin of elk to the bellies of magpies.
The magpie probed an ear with its bill and then                     A cleaning mutualism is a mutually beneficial
stuck its head inside the ear to probe deeper. The elk              relationship between two species in which one
did not move. Then the magpie withdrew, turned                      removes ectoparasites, most commonly ticks, from
its attention to the other ear and groomed it slowly                the other. One individual is relieved of bothersome,
                                                            43
usually blood-sucking hitchhikers and the other                 yanked again. The elk quickly stood up and walked
gains an easy meal in a safe interaction. Several               away. The other raven also approached a young elk
cleaning mutualisms involve birds and large                     and yanked out a tuft of hair. One raven took five
mammals. The textbook example is red-billed and                 yankfuls from several elk before it could hold no
yellow-billed African oxpeckers cleaning rhinos,                more in its bill. Both ravens flew off to line their
cape buffalo, zebras and giraffes. Several lesser-              nests with elk fur.
known mutualisms have been described in North                        Elk responded differently to magpies and
America. Scrub jays remove ticks and insects from               ravens. When a magpie approached them, they
Columbian blacktail deer, and both scrub jays and               sat or stood still, even when the bird probed deep
crows groom wild boars. Magpies forage on feral                 into their ears. Ravens approached only young elk.
horses in Nevada. Jays, crows, ravens and magpies               Perhaps the ravens knew that the older elk had
are all members of the family Corvidae, meaning                 already learned to avoid ravens collecting nesting
they are closely related. Many corvids engage in                material. Each young and presumably naïve elk
cleaning mutualisms, but not all; Steller’s jays and            responded to being plucked with alarm if not
ravens are not known to groom large mammals.                    indignation and moved away from the aggressive
     Two ravens dropped into the herd and I                     raven.
wondered whether they would also groom elk, but
they had a surprise for me and for the young elk.
One of them walked up to a young elk, grabbed                   Jeff Mitton (mitton@colorado.edu) is chair of the
a bill full of fur and yanked. The elk glared at the            Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
raven, but the bold raven grabbed more fur and                  at the University of Colorado.
                                                           44
                                   Symbiotic Relationships
                          Nomeous Fish	
                                            ↔      Man o’ War 	
                                                                              ➛            Mutualism
                                                             45
    Hermit Crab	         ↔ Sea Anemone	       ➛   Mutualism
    Cowbird	
                         ↔ Bison	             ➛   Commensalism
    Red-billed Oxpeker	
                         ↔ Impala	            ➛   Mutualism
                                  46
                             An Interview with Daniel Pink
Why Waldorf?
by
Tracy Stevens
                          Daniel Pink is a horizontal               the arts will be the way to prosper and succeed in the new
                          thinker. He has had his hand in           economy. The arts are also a way to help people reach
                          business, government, law, and            their potential and find their element.
                          writing among other things.
                          He worked with U.S. Labor                 How can teachers use the arts as a tool to teach?
                          Secretary Robert Reich and was            The arts in education enable teachers to explore subjects
                          formerly chief speechwriter               in ways that can be better understood and inter-related.
                          for Vice President Al Gore.               History, math, science and any other subject can be taught
                          He is a contributing editor               through the arts in ways that brings them to life. The arts
                          of Wired magazine and an                  provide a way to connect subjects, as they are in the real
                          independent business consultant           world.
                          as well as a best-selling author
who chronicles the changing of the work world. Pink                 How do Waldorf schools fit with the dawning of the
postulates that in the future right-brained thinking will           Conceptual Age?
dominate and drive the new economy. It will no longer               Waldorf schools get the idea that the arts are fundamental,
be enough to rely on left-brained thinking alone. He                not ornamental. They focus on the unit of the child, not
describes the Conceptual Age as the newest phase of the             the school as an institution. They customize education
modern economy in which we will need to develop and                 for each child. Waldorf promotes autonomy and self-
incorporate the six senses of design, story, symphony,              direction. whereas most schools actively squelch those
empathy, play, and meaning for success.                             qualities in favor of compliance, which seems to be the
  Pink, the author of A Whole New Mind: Why Right                   most important value. The irony is that compliance is
Brainers Will Rule the Future sees Waldorf education                much harder to achieve and it is less important in the
as not only addressing the 21st century’s need for right            work world. I think Waldorf schools are very much in
brain skill development, but doing it in a manner that              synch with the notion of the Conceptual Age and the ideas
creates lifelong motivation by de-emphasizing the                   of A Whole New Mind. They foster internal motivation in
reward-and-punishment, high-stakes test environment                 students, as well as mastery and persistence. They teach
characteristic of the No Child Left Behind legislation.
                                                                    the habits of the heart that children need to do well in life
Following are excerpts from Tracy Stevens’s interview.
                                                                    after school.
                                                               47
education. We are not talking about replacing math               music, theater, etc., and parents are great coaches
with art! We are talking about bringing out math more            and facilitators in this self-discovery. Through any
strongly through art. The arts train people to become            of these activities, kids learn valuable skills of
horizontal thinkers who can make connections. We need            collaboration, teamwork, persistence, and mastery.
to rethink this whole notion of frog-marching kids from          We should not be forcing them to learn a musical
one isolated subject to another. The world does not work         instrument or play a team sport if they are not
that way, and we are doing kids a disservice to train            interested.
them that subjects are separate and unrelated before they
get out into the work world. The world has very porous           If a school devotes only thirty minutes a day to
borders and is a tangle of interconnections. Schools             creativity, what would be the most beneficial
should be preparing them for that.                               activities they could engage in with their
                                                                 students?
What kinds of programs or features should parents                The students should sit down and write letters to
be looking for when exploring school options for their           their principal asking why they have only thirty
children, be it pre-school or secondary grades?                  minutes a day for creativity! That is not useful!
It really depends on the kid. There isn’t a formula for          We shouldn’t be having separate, isolated time
this, but it is not the one-size-fits-all approach that          for creativity and then tell them, “Stop thinking
we have. Figure out what is engaging for your child,             creatively because now it is time for the real
what he likes and is good at and pursue that. I think            learning. Time for math.” The idea is to master
the schools have a tremendous burden on them. They               skills and content, become curious and engaged.
can’t do everything that is expected of them from                Compartmentalizing is not going to help them
parents and the government. They can’t be all things             achieve this. It is contrary to it.
to all people. Schools are expected to teach academics,          ___________________
provide healthcare, nutrition, and sex education. They           For more on Daniel Pink, go to www.danielpink.
are supposed to build character and morals and even              com.To learn more about Waldorf education, go to
participate in community service. The burdens on our             www.whywaldorfworks.org.
schools are outrageous. Parents have to share some of the
load or it will collapse.                                        To read more by and about Tracy Stevens, please
                                                                 visit her website: www.abettereducation.blogspot.
How can parents help to improve a child’s                        com.
opportunities for success in the Conceptual Age?
Pay attention to what your child likes to do and is
good at and give him plenty of opportunities to follow
his interests toward mastery. We want them to be
intrinsically motivated and to be persistent. There is a
process of discovery in trying out new things: sports.
                                                            48
49
50
    Teaching Sensible Science Course to Begin in
October, 2010
    The next Teaching Sensible Science Course will begin at the Chicago Waldorf
School in October 2010. This is an excellent training course for class teachers who
want to prepare themselves for teaching the science curriculum in Grades 6 through
8. The course is comprised of three, one-week sessions, each focusing on the Physics
and Chemistry curriculum of a specific grade. Led by Michael D’Aleo, participants
will enrich their understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of the phenom-
enological approach to teaching science and benefit from lots of practical advice and
experience in presenting the demonstrations and experiments. This course is highly
recommended. The tentative dates for the three sessions are:
   For more information or to register, contact the director of the program, Michael
D’Aleo, at: spalight@verizon.net.
                                          51
                                Index of Past Issues
                                             Waldorf Science Newsletter
                                              edited by David Mitchell
                                              © AWSNA Publications
	
    This newsletter is published once a year and is dedicated to developing science teaching in the Waldorf schools.
Teachers are invited to pose questions, seek resource material, discuss experiments, write about their classes (suc-
cessful and not very successful), and investigate phenomena. The editor also translates relevant science articles from
Waldorf periodicals from around the world. The following past editions are available from:
    	
	
                                                 AWSNA Publications
                                            E-mail: publications@awsna.org
                                                458 Harold Meyers Road
                                                   Earlton, NY 12058
                                                  fax: 518/ 634-2597
                                                 phone: 518/ 634-2222
Volume 1, #1 	
Partial contents—Acoustics in Grade 6; Teaching about Alcohol in Grade 8 Chemistry; The Chemistry Curriculum:
The Debate over Teacher Demonstration vs. Student Experimentation; Spiritual Aspects of 20th Century Science;
Overview of the Waldorf Science Curriculum; Water; Characteristics of the Major Sugars; Goethe’s Meditation on
Granite; Book Reviews; Humor; Poetry; Conferences; and Sample Experiments
	
Volume 1, #2	
Partial contents—The Characteristics of Drugs; Eratosthenes Revived; The Golden Number; Educational Guidelines
for a Chemical Formula Language; The Properties of Acids and Bases; Walter Lebendörfer on Chemistry; Biology
in the 11th Grade; What Is Home?; The Waldorf Environmental Curriculum; Environmental Education; Women in
Science; Book Reviews; Humor; Poetry; Conferences; and Sample Experiments
Volume 2, #3	
Partial contents—Grade 12 Physics—Von Mackensen; Biology Teaching in the 11th Grade; Euclid’s Algorithm; The
Logos and Goethean Observation; Nature Education; Aristotle’s Taste Spectrum; Book Reviews; Humor; Poetry;
Conferences; and Sample Experiments
Volume 2, #4	
Partial contents—Current Research; Strange Theories; Science Education and Wonder; The Human Earth; Steiner’s
Counterspace Examined; The Cow; Language and the Book of Nature; Book Reviews; Humor; Poetry; Confer-
ences; and Sample Experiment
Volume 3, #5	
Partial contents—Book Reviews; First Lessons in Astronomy; Steps in the Development of Thinking (Power of
Judgment); Computer Science and Computers in the Waldorf School; Technology; Computers in Education; Some
Characteristics of the Computer; Computers and Consciousness; Experiments
Volume 3, #6	
Partial contents—Space and Counter Space; New Eyes for Plants; Experiments of Academia dell Cement; Physics
and Chemistry in the Grades; Goethean Science Credits; Chemistry Workshop; Table of Important Salts; Goethe’s
Scientific Imagination; To Infinity and Back in Class 11; ∏ and Trigonometry; Science in the Waldorf Kindergarten;
A Note on Pascal’s Triangle; Experiments
Volume 4, #7	
Partial contents—The Message of the Sphinx; Honey; Cell Cosmology; Einstein’s Question; What Is Goethean
Science?; Prototype Computer Program; River Watch as a Classroom Activity; Thoughts on Curriculum Standards;
Comments on Building a Waldorf School; Experiments
                                                          52
Volume 4, #8
Partial contents—Towards Holistic Biology; How DNA Computers Work; Solar System Facts; What Is Goethean
Science?; Human Movement and the Nervous System; What Is Science?; What Is Meant by “Teaching the Chil-
dren to Breathe?”; Experiments
Volume 5, #9
Partial contents—The Globe Inside Our Planet; Music, Blood and Hemoglobin; Standards in Science; Cognitive
Channels—the Learning Cycles and Middle School Students; 8th Grade Physics, From Dividing to Extracting
Roots; What Is Lambda?; Waldorf Science Kits
Volume 5, #10
Partial contents—Reading the Rocks; Why the Arts Are Important to Science; The Three Groups of Rocks; In-
troduction to Geology; The Rock Cycle; Mineralogy for Grade 6; Metals and Minerals, Precious Stones—Their
Meaning for Earth, the Human Being, and the Cosmos; Experiments
Volume 6, #11
Partial contents—A Chemistry of Process; Sponges and Sinks and Rags; How to Read Science; Experiences and
Suggestions for Chemistry Teaching; Experimentation as an Art; Biographies—Dmitri Mendeleev, Joseph Priest-
ley, Marie Curie; Destructive Distillation; Experiments
Volume 6, #12
Partial contents—Light and Darkness in 6th Grade Physics; The Relation of “Optical Elevation” to Binocular Vi-
sion; Description of Curves in Connection with Elevation Phenomena; Water Treatment at the Toronto Waldorf
School; A Lime Kiln that Can Be Assembled and Disassembled; Experiments
Volume 7, #13
Partial contents—Thoughts on Returning to an “Education Towards Freedom”; Pedagogical Motives for the
Third Seven-Year Period; Social Education through Mathematics Lessons; A Vision for Waldorf Education; Our
Approach to Math Doesn’t Add Up; International Mathematics Curriculum
Volume 7, #14
Partial contents—Conferences; Physiology, Update on Taste; Pictorial Earthquake; Boiling with Snow; Towards
a Waldorf High School Science Curriculum for the 21st Century; The Thermal Decomposition of Calcium Car-
bonate; Crystals Reveal Unexpected Beginnings; Cosmic Ray Studies on Skis; Experiments
Volume 8, #15
Partial contents—Book Reviews; Arabic Science; Arabic Mathematics: Forgotten Brilliance; Making Natural
Dyes; Exploring the Qualities of Iron; Von Mackensen Chemistry Conference; Oalic and Formic Acid; Hydraulic
Rams; What the Water Spider Taught Me
Volume 8, #16
Partial contents—Waldorf High School Research Papers; Inside the Gulf of Maine; How Do Atomistic Models
Act on the Understanding of Nature in the Young Person?; The House of Arithmetic; Origami Mathematics;
Sixth Grade Acoustics; Sixth Grade Kaleidoscopes; Tricks with Mirrors; The Flour Mill and the Industrial Revo-
lution; Web Gems; Understanding Parabolic Reflectors; The Capacitor; Oscillation and Waves; Crystal Radio;
Qualifications for High School Mathematics Teaching
Volume 9, #17
Partial contents—Book Reviews; Acknowledgement from a Waldorf Parent; Raising Money for Science; The
Twelve-Year-Old Child and Orpheus; Towards a Sensible Kind of Chemistry, Part One; The Lightning Bug; The
Ladybug; Exploratory Experimentation: Goethe, Land, and Faraday; Faraday’s Synthetic Investigation of Sole-
noids; Faraday’s Analytic Investigation of Induction; Geometric Addition Table: A Curious Configuration
Volume 9, #18
Partial contents—Book Reviews; Towards a Sensible Kind of Chemistry, Part Two; The Evolution of the Fast
Brain; Professors Vie with Web for Class Attention; The Teenage Edge; Oscillator Coil Demonstration Using an
Ultra-Low Frequency LC-“Tank” Circuit; Thermodynamic Experiments for the Middle School
                                                       53
Volume 10, #19
Partial contents—Book Reviews; The Beaver; Nature in the Human Being; Astronomy Verses for the Middle
School; Child Development and the Teaching of Science; Bibliography for Middle School Teachers; What Is
Phenomenology?; The Design of Human and Animal Bodies; The Brain and Finger Dexterity; Observations of a
Neurophysiologist
54