Artifact #2
Teachers' Rights and Responsibilities
         Kacie Gottenborg
    College of Southern Nevada
        September 23, 2017
Artifact #2 Teachers' Rights and Responsibilities                                                   2
       Freddie Watts, a high school principal, along with Jimmy Brothers, an assistant principal,
are both African American administrators assigned to administer a predominantly black school
high school. Ann Griffin, a white, tenured teacher employed at this high school got into a
heated conversation with two administrators and during this conversation stated she "hated all
black folks". When word got around of her statement, it caused negative reactions among her
colleagues. Freddie Watts, recommended dismissal because of concerns regarding her ability to
treat all students fairly and her judgement and competency as a teacher were also put into
question.
       Because the high school teacher, Ann Griffin is a tenured teacher this means she has
served a specified probationary period that guarantees her continued employment unless the
district can establish "good and just cause" for dismissal. Tenure is a right by statute; it is not a
constitutional right. Once the teacher is granted tenure the teacher is said to have a "property
right" to continued employment, which cannot be taken away without due process. Most
tenure statutes specify the requirements and procedures both for acquiring tenure and for
dismissing the tenured teacher. When tenure is created by the state, the local school board
cannot change the terms of its acquisition and the procedures and grounds for dismissal.
       Being an American, we as people have rights. These rights are stated under the
constitutional amendments. For instance, the First Amendment of our constitution addresses
several basic personal freedoms. It states that Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances. The second clause of the First Amendment, which
deals with freedom of speech, has also been the subject of a growing number of education
cases. For instance, in the Pickering v. Board of Education case, which will be presented in
Freddie Watt's favor, Marvin Pickering was terminated after writing a letter to the newspaper
severely criticizing the superintendent and school board over their handling of school funds.
The Supreme Court found that the school had violated the teacher's rights to free speech. The
Court further held that unless the public expression undermines the effectiveness of the
working relationship between the teacher and the teacher's superior or coworkers, the
teacher's ability to perform their assigned duties, or the orderly operation of the schools, such
expression may not furnish grounds for reprisal. I say that this case is in Freddie Watt's favor
because I do believe Ann Griffin's comment undermines the working relationship between
herself and coworkers and it affects her ability to potentially perform assigned duties.
       The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution protects individuals from giving self-
incriminating testimony, but this is only in a courtroom or in court-like situations. At a dismissal
hearing, a teacher may not invoke this privilege and may be required to answer direct questions
related to his or her employment. This would not be good news for Ann Griffin.
       I feel the court will rule in Freddie Watt's favor in this case. I don't think Ann Griffin had
any right to say what she did. I think the court will agree that her ability to treat students fairly
are extremely questioned.
Artifact #2 Teachers' Rights and Responsibilities                                         4
                                           References
Underwood, Julie and L. Dean. Webb. School Law for Teachers: Concepts and Applications.
       Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall, 2006.