Scribd
Upload
485 views1 page

Taxation Power in CIR v. Santos

1) Guild of Philippine Jewelers questioned the constitutionality of tax provisions in the Tariff and Customs Code and the National Internal Revenue Code, arguing that the tax structure increased costs and made local jewelers uncompetitive with other Asian countries. 2) The Court ruled that while the Guild presented a study on jewelry tax rates in other Asian countries, the tax rates of other nations could not be used to determine appropriate subjects of taxation in the Philippines. 3) The Court held that the state has the sovereign power to select subjects of taxation, and differences in taxation or exemptions between classes do not violate constitutional limits.

Uploaded by

Lizzy Way
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
485 views1 page

Taxation Power in CIR v. Santos

1) Guild of Philippine Jewelers questioned the constitutionality of tax provisions in the Tariff and Customs Code and the National Internal Revenue Code, arguing that the tax structure increased costs and made local jewelers uncompetitive with other Asian countries. 2) The Court ruled that while the Guild presented a study on jewelry tax rates in other Asian countries, the tax rates of other nations could not be used to determine appropriate subjects of taxation in the Philippines. 3) The Court held that the state has the sovereign power to select subjects of taxation, and differences in taxation or exemptions between classes do not violate constitutional limits.

Uploaded by

Lizzy Way
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CIR v.

Santos, 277 SCRA 617 (1997)

G.R. No. 119252 August 18, 1997

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, petitioners,


vs.
HON. APOLINARIO B. SANTOS, in his capacity as Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 67,
Pasig City; ANTONIO M. MARCO; JEWELRY BY MARCO & CO., INC., and GUILD OF PHILIPPINE
JEWELLERS, INC., respondents.

HERMOSISIMA, JR., J.:

Facts: Guild of Phil. Jewelers, Inc. questions the constitutionality of certain provisions of the NIRC and
Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines. It is their contention that the present Tariff and tax structure
increases manufacturing costs and render local jewelry manufacturers uncompetitive against other
countries, in support of their position, they submitted what they purported to be an exhaustive study of
the tax rates on jewelry prevailing in other Asian countries, in comparison to tax rates levied in the
country.

Issue: WON the state has the power to select the subjects of taxation.

Ruling: YES. The respondents presented an exhaustive study on the tax rates on jewelry levied by
different Asian countries. This is meant to convince us that compared to other countries; the tax rates
imposed on said industry in the Philippines is oppressive and confiscatory.

This Court, however, cannot subscribe to the theory that the tax rates of other countries should be used
as a yardstick in determining what may be the proper subjects of taxation in our own country. It should
be pointed out that in imposing the aforementioned taxes and duties, the State, acting through the
legislative and executive branches, is exercising its sovereign prerogative. It is inherent in the power to
tax that the State be free to select the subjects of taxation, and it has been repeatedly held that
"inequalities which result from a singling out or one particular class for taxation, or exemption, infringe
no constitutional limitation." 25

You might also like