St.
Paul University Philippines
Tuguegarao City, Cagayan 3500
Basic Education Unit
The water analysis of the drinking fountains in St.
Paul University Philippines
A Research Paper Submitted to:
MS. NORMI ANNE M. TUAZON
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Research Project
(Capstone Research Project)
Submitted by:
Ma.Fatima,Galamgam
Ian Seth Sibbaluca
Sean Patrick Panganiban
Vince Allan De Leon
Marvin Aranilla
Andre Palattao
Chapter I
INTRODUCTION
Background of the study
As outbreak of waterborne diseases, like typhoid a cholera,
hit the country, with unprotected water sources, non-
chlorination of community-based systems, and inadequate water
monitoring, as few of the reasons for the outbreaks. With the
installation of drinking fountains, a device, which supplies
drinking water in public places such as streets, parks, and
schools. Accordingly, some of the first water fountain designs
included chained metal drinking cups, which ultimately proved
unsanitary and capable of spread diseases. Numerous public users
are prone of any waterborne diseases when inadequate water
monitoring/ analysis is not in plan. According to World Health
Organization (WHO) in their Guidelines for Drinking Water
Quality recommended that water suppliers develop and implement
Water Safety Plans or WPSs in order to systematically assess and
manage risks. The WHO added that the use of WSPs would
contribute in reducing the environmental risks of waterborne
diseases, in order to minimize these disease outbreaks.
The St. Paul University Philippine has various drinking
fountains wherein almost everyone drink from it. From
preparatory kids to teachers, even SPUP’s visitors sometimes use
it to hydrate themselves or quench their thirst. It is now new
that the mount of people using the water fountain is
diversified. Others are spitting and sneezing worse, some are
sick, have cough or flu, etc. with certain germs will get in the
way, oftentimes, it is asked, is drink? Accordingly the study
done by the Toronto Star, it concludes that even a dog’s bowl is
safer to drink out of than a water fountain wherein they
compared the bacteria of water fountain and dog’s bowl. It says
that water fountain had 4,529 bacteria and dog bowl only had 172
bacteria. To end various speculation, water analysis will be
conducted to drinking fountains inside the campus. Likewise, to
see if SPUP abides to the WHO’s Guidelines for Drinking Water
Quality.
Statement of the Problems
The study aims to determine whether the drinking fountain of
St. Paul University of Philippines is safe from drinking.
Specifically, his sought to answer are the following:
1. Is there any pathogen can be found in the water from
drinking fountain?
2. Is there a significant difference between the three samples
in terms of amount of the bacteria present in each samples?
3. Does the water in the drinking fountain reuse its water?
Objectives of the study
This study aims to study the safetiness of the filtered water
from different drinking fountain inside the campus. This study
also aims to:
1. Analyse the variation of bacteria present in the water from
the drinking fountains,
Significance of the study
The importance of this study is to provide information
about the drinking fountain. The result of the study can be
utilized by reviving he use of drinking fountains to help ensure
the availability of safe and reliable drinking fountains,
encourage their use entities providing free practices for
maintaining fountains, and invest in new, modern installations
as needed. In addition, the safetiness of the user who will
drink in this kind of drinking station especially the students
and the people inside the university will rest assured that they
are drinking safe and clean water from the fountain.
Besides, this study ensures the safetiness of the people
who will drink in this kind of drinking station especially the
following:
Students and Teachers. As one of the main consumers of the water
from the drinking fountain will have knowledge about the water
they’re drinking.
SPUP Administration. To increase awareness about the water
they’re providing to everyone so that they can improve all
actions that can be done for the sake of the consumers.
Future Researchers. To provide initial actions for them to come
up a better solution to avoid waterborne diseases that can be
taken from the water.
Scope and Delimitations
The focus of this study is to analyze the water in the
drinking fountain inside the campus and to provide information
to everyone. This study limits only to the direct water coming
from the drinking fountain. This study limits on the treatments
that might be used in the drinking fountain.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
This section provides studies and possible literature that
are relevant to our research study to provide better
understanding, initial knowledge and our basis about the said
study.
Related literature
In her MCP thesis, "Drinking Fountains: The Past and Future
of Free Public Water in the United States", Josselyn Ivanov (MCP
2015) analyzed an often-overlooked aspect of our cities, public
water fountains:
Drinking fountains have a rich history as pieces of urban
infrastructure. Installed in Renaissance Rome as public art
glorifying the Pope, in industrial London as a humanitarian
source of cholera-free water, and in prohibition-era America to
discourage alcohol consumption, drinking fountains have filled
many public functions over many centuries. But today’s drinking
fountains, when installed at all, are purely utilitarian:
undersigned in terms of both form and strategic urban placement.
Shoved between bathrooms and trashcans and probably broken,
drinking fountains have fallen on hard times in the public
realm. Many Americans express skepticism of public water
sources, and millions choose expensive and polluting bottled
waters instead, reflecting underlying attitudes about distrust
of government and public infrastructure.
There are compelling reasons to rethink and redesign our
relationship with drinking fountains. Today, the United States
confronts a new set of challenges: neglected urban spaces,
obesity and lifestyle-related disease, widespread privatization
of public goods, rampant socio-economic inequality, and plastic
pollution. Drinking fountains may be uniquely suited to help
confront these problems by cutting down on bottle waste,
providing accessible water for homeless and vulnerable
populations, reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages,
facilitating exercise, and adding interest and beauty to public
spaces - but they will only be able to achieve these goals
through thoughtful design and good maintenance. In surveys,
people were more likely to drinking from outdoor drinking
fountains if they believed that they were clean, safe, and
beautiful; the importance of appeal in decision-making has been
understood by corporations like Coca-Cola and Apple for decades,
but has been little-considered in promoting public water.
Drinking fountains, a seemingly insignificant urban element with
huge actual potential, are an exemplar of what is possible when
societies value public space and the public good. Addressing
both the problems in current fountains and in peoples’
perceptions of them could reframe drinking fountains to help
address some of today’s most pressing problems.
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents the methods to be used in the study.
It describes the research design, research locale, subject of
the study, data gathering procedures, and method of analysis or
statistical tool.
Research Design
The experimental method of research will be used in
conducting this study. Experimental because its tests the safety
and the cleanliness of the water and to site other findings from
the conducted tests.
Research Locale
This study was conducted at St. Paul University Philippines
Tuguegarao City, Cagayan and Department of Science and
Technology (DOST) Tuguegarao City, Cagayan.
Experimenal Procedure
Sample Collection. Collect 100 ml water from the different
drinking fountain located inside St. Paul University
Philippines. Put each to a transparent glass container that are
sterilized and close them tightly hem label as FOUNTAIN A, B, C,
D, E respectfully.
Water Analysis
Bring all he collected data to the nearest water analysis
laboratory that is accredited by Department of Science and
Technology (DOST). Gather the data from the results of the water
analysis.