Scribd
Upload
234 views34 pages

Jeffrey Epstein Jail Logs 3 of 3

Jane Doe, the plaintiff, has responded to the defendant's motion for a protective order. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's request should be denied because it would prevent the fair adjudication of relevant issues in the case. The plaintiff believes the information sought is necessary to prove their claims and that a protective order is not warranted based on the facts of the case.

Uploaded by

CNBC.com
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
234 views34 pages

Jeffrey Epstein Jail Logs 3 of 3

Jane Doe, the plaintiff, has responded to the defendant's motion for a protective order. The plaintiff argues that the defendant's request should be denied because it would prevent the fair adjudication of relevant issues in the case. The plaintiff believes the information sought is necessary to prove their claims and that a protective order is not warranted based on the facts of the case.

Uploaded by

CNBC.com
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 34

PLAINTIFF JANE DOE’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER [DE 536]

CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON

EXHIBIT I
Part 3 of 3

You might also like