0% found this document useful (0 votes)
138 views5 pages

1 Definition of A Scale Parameter: Avd. Matematisk Statistik

1) The document defines a scale parameter as a parameter θ in a distribution function F(x; θ) such that F(x; θ) can be written as H(x/θ) for some distribution function H, making the distribution scale-free. 2) It shows that θ is a scale parameter if and only if the distribution of X/θ does not depend on θ. It also shows this property holds if the density function f(x; θ) can be written as g(x/θ) for some density g. 3) Examples of scale parameters are given for common distributions like Normal, Exponential, and Weibull. The scale-free property means probabilities do not depend

Uploaded by

Abro Fatima
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
138 views5 pages

1 Definition of A Scale Parameter: Avd. Matematisk Statistik

1) The document defines a scale parameter as a parameter θ in a distribution function F(x; θ) such that F(x; θ) can be written as H(x/θ) for some distribution function H, making the distribution scale-free. 2) It shows that θ is a scale parameter if and only if the distribution of X/θ does not depend on θ. It also shows this property holds if the density function f(x; θ) can be written as g(x/θ) for some density g. 3) Examples of scale parameters are given for common distributions like Normal, Exponential, and Weibull. The scale-free property means probabilities do not depend

Uploaded by

Abro Fatima
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Avd.

Matematisk statistik

Sf 2955: Computer intensive methods :


SCALE PARAMETER/ Timo Koski

The notation
F (x; θ)
denotes a distribution function that depends on a parameter θ. For example,

1 − e−x/θ if x ≥ 0
F (x; θ) =
0 if x < 0,

is the distribution function of the exponential distribution Exp (θ).

1 Definition of a Scale Parameter


We define a scale parameter.

Definition 1.1 Assume θ > 0 in F (x; θ). Then θ is a scale parameter, if it


holds for all x that x
F (x; θ) = H , (1.1)
θ
where H(x) is a distribution function.

To take an example, θ is scale parameter in the exponential distribution


Exp (θ), as we have x
F (x; θ) = H ,
θ
where 
1 − e−x if x ≥ 0
H(x) =
0 if x < 0.

1
2 Properties, Pivotal Variables
We observe two lemmas.

Lemma 2.1 Assume X ∈ F (x; θ). θ is a scale parameter if and only if the
distribution of
X
θ
does not depend on θ.
X
Proof: ⇒: Assume θ is a scale parameter. Then the distribution of θ
is given
by  
X
P ≤ z = P (X ≤ θz)
θ
since θ > 0 by definition. Then, as we assume that θ is a scale parameter,
 
θz
P (X ≤ θz) = F (θz; θ) = H = H (z) ,
θ
or  
X
P ≤z = H(z)
θ
which says that Xθ has distribution which does not depend on θ.
⇐: We assume that Xθ has distribution, say H, which does not depend on
θ > 0. Then  
X x
F (x; θ) = P (X ≤ x; θ) = P ≤ ;θ
θ θ
since θ > 0. But by assumption
 
X x x
P ≤ ;θ = H
θ θ θ

where the distribution function H (z) does not depend on θ. But then we
have for any x shown that
x
F (x; θ) = H
θ
which in view of (1.1) gives the claim as asserted.
This lemma says that Xθ is a pivotal variable.

2
Remark 2.1 Note that a pivotal variable need not be a statistic − the va-
riable can depend on parameters of the model, but its distribution must not.
If it is a statistic, then it is known as an ancillary statistic. Pivotal quantities
are used to the construction of test statistics, e.g., Student’s t−statistic is
pivotal for a normal distribution with unknown variance (and mean). Pivotal
variables provide in addition a method of constructing confidence intervals,
and the use of pivotal quantities improves performance of the bootstrap, as
defined later.

d
Lemma 2.2 Assume F (x; θ) has a density dx F (x; θ) = f (x; θ) for all x.
Then θ is a scale parameter if and only if
1 x
f (x; θ) = g , (2.2)
θ θ
where g is a probability density.
Proof: ⇒: If F (x; θ) has an integrable derivative and θ is a scale parameter,
then it holds from (1.1 ) that
d d x 1 x
f (x; θ) = F (x; θ) = H = g
dx dx θ θ θ
d
where we have set g(x) = dx
H (x), which is a density function, as H is a
distribution function.
⇐: We assume that
1 x
f (x; θ) = g .
θ θ
Then Z x
1 x u
Z
F (x; θ) = f (u; θ)du = g du.
−∞ θ −∞ θ
Here we make a change of variable t = uθ , du = θdt and thus
Z x
1 x u
Z x
θ
g du = g (t) dt = G .
θ −∞ θ −∞ θ
d
where dx
G (x) = g(x). In other words we have obtained for every x that
x
F (x; θ) = G ,
θ
3
and since G (x) is a distribution function, the desired assertion follows by
(1.1).

3 Examples and the Scale-Free property


We give first some further examples.

1. X ∈ N (µσ, σ 2 ). We guess that σ is a scale parameter. The pertinent


density is
1 (x−µσ)2
f (x; σ) = √ e− 2σ2
2πσ
and some elementary algebra gives
x −µ)2
1 (σ 1 x
f (x; σ) = √ e− 2 = g ,
2πσ σ σ

where g is the density of N(µ, 1) or


1 (z−µ)2
g (z) = √ e− 2

and the desired conclusion follows by (2.2).

2. X ∈ R (0, θ). Then we take x ∈ [0, 1] and get


 
X θx
P ≤ x = P (X ≤ θx) = =x
θ θ

as the distribution function of R(0, θ) is F (z) = θz . The desired conclu-


sion follows now from the first lemma. We have shown that Xθ ∈ R(0, 1),
which is, however, immediate from the definitions.

3. Finally, we take the Weibull distribution, so that


 k
1 − e−(x/λ) if x ≥ 0
F (x; λ) =
0 if x < 0.

For k = 1 gives the exponential distribution, and k = 2 gives the


Rayleigh distribution. It is obvious that λ > 0 is scale parameter.

4
Suppose that X ∈ Exp (θ) is a lifetime measured in seconds. Then θ =
E [X] is also measured in seconds. We might convert seconds to minutes.
But the probability x
P (X ≤ x) = H ,
θ
is the same whether we measure in minutes or seconds, i.e., it is invariant
with respect to scale or the units of measurement, as is quite reasonable.

You might also like