ADVANCED NURSING PRACTICE
A SEMINAR ON
            TRANSCULTURAL
                NURSING
SUBMITTED TO,                      SUBMITTED BY,
PROF.V.MARY ELIZABETH               MS.RIYA PHILIPOSE
PRINCIPAL                           I YEAR M.Sc(N)
VIJAYA COLLEGE OF NURSING          VIJAYA COLLEGE OF
KOTTARAKARA                         NURSING
                                    KOTTARAKARA
                SUBMITTED ON, 11/7/19
       VIJAYA COLLEGE OF NURSING
         COURSE- I YEAR M.Sc (N)
  SUBJECT- ADVANCED NURSING PRACTICE
     TOPIC- TRANSCULTURAL NURSING
                UNIT- X
           NURSING PRACTICE
NAME OF THE STUDENT-MS.RIYA PHILIPOSE
    NAME OF THE HOD-MRS. RAJI RAJU
 NAME OF THE EVALUATOR-PROF. V. MARY
              ELIZABETH
        HOURS ALLOTTED- 1 HOUR
 SUBMITTED TO- PROF.V. MARY ELIZABETH
       DATE OF SUBMISSION- 9/7/19
                         INDEX
SL.NO                 CONTENT             PAGE NUMBER
I       INTRODUCTION
II.     DEFINITION OF TRANSCULTURAL
        NURSING
III     GOAL OF TRANSCULTURAL NURSING
IV      HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVES
V       CHANGING CONCEPT OF
        TRANSCULTURAL NURSING
VI      IMPORTANCE OF TRANSCULTURAL
        NURSING
VII     PROCESS INVOLVED IN CULTURAL
        COMPETENT CARE
VIII    CULTURAL ASSESSMENT
IX      CULTURAL CARE THEORY BY
        LEININGER
X       CULTURAL PERSPECTIVE OF PAIN
XI      NURSES ROLE
XII     APPLICATION IN NURSING FIELD
XIII    FUTURE OF TRANSCULTURAL
        NURSING
XIV     NURSING PROCESS OF A CULTURALLY
        DIVERSE PATIENT
XV      SUMMARY
XVI     ABSTRACT
XVII    CONCLUSION
XVIII   BIBLIOGRAPHY
                COLLABORATION MODELS IN
                       NURSING
INTRODUCTION
Collaboration is a process in which two or more individuals work together jointly
influencing one another, for the attainment of a goal. The word collaboration
implies working together for the greater good, but it actually encompasses far more.
Several preconditions must be in place for collaboration to be successful.
      Collaboration is a partnership in which all parties are valued for their
contribution. Collaboration uses the data, plan implement evaluate and gain
objectivity by examining another’s viewpoints. Collaboration must have shared
objectives. The value system among the participants must be similar. Successful
collaborative nursing practice and collaborative healthcare practice need to
encompass all of these conditions. Collaboration health care practices facilitate
better patient outcomes. The healthcare team works as a group utilizing individual
skills and talents to reach the highest of patient care standards. A multidisciplinary
plan of care should be decided by all of the team members. Individual disciplines
must be willing to work together, have the same objectives and goals, and provide a
plan of care which is individualized to the patients need. A multidisciplinary
approach to care sounds simple in theory, but collaboration of different skill levels
and expertise has its problems.
   I.     MEANING OF COLLABORATION
The word collaboration, namely co and labor are, in Latin to mean “work
together”.
That means the interaction among two or more individuals, which can encompass a
variety of actions such as communication, information sharing, cooperation,
problem solving and negotiation. Teamwork and collaboration are often used
synonymously. The description of collaboration is a dynamic process resulting
from developmental group stages as an outcome producing a synthesis of different
perspectives. The collaborative process involves synthesis different perspectives to
better understand complex problems. An effective collaboration is characterized by
building and sustaining “win –win-win” relationships.
   II.    DEFINITION OF COLLABORATION
“Collaboration is a process by which members of various disciplines (or agencies)
share their expertise. Accomplishing this requires these individuals understand and
appreciate what it is that they contribute to the whole.”
                                                                 (Heinemann et al)
  “Collaboration is the most formal inter organizational relationship involving
shared authority and responsibility for planning, implementation, and evaluation of
a joint effort.”
                                                                (Horde, 1986)
“Collaboration as a …. A mutually beneficial and well defined relationship entered
into by two or more organization to achieve common goal”
                                           (Mattessich, Murray and Monsey 2001)
   III.   OBJECTIVES OF COLLABORATION
  1. To seek creative, integrated solution where need and goal of both the sides
     are important commitment and consensual decision.
      The collaboration is a working practice whereby individuals work together
      with a common purpose to achieve a common goal. The collaboration helps
      in taking appropriate decisions. Sharing different ideas and the
      brainstorming sessions fosters critical thinking and helps in making well-
      defined solutions for a problem.
  2. To identify, share and merge vastly different viewpoints.
      Collaboration provides every team member with equal opportunities to
      participate and communicate their ideas. It generates dynamic, innovative
      ideas.
  3. To develop individual skill and confidence.
      Collaboration is mutually beneficial for the employees as well as the
      organization because when they work together, interact and share ideas, they
      see and understand how other’s work, think, negotiate and operate their
      ideas.
  4. Collaboration and consultation are essential elements of safe, competent,
     ethical nursing practice.
      Nurses are expected to collaborate with patients, with each other and with
      members of the healthcare team for the benefit of the patient. Nurses are also
      expected to consult with others when any situation is beyond their
      competence. Collaboration is ongoing communication and decision making
   with the goal of working toward identified patient care customers. Effective
   communication skills are critical to successful consultation and
   collaboration.
IV. NEED FOR COLLABORATION
Considerable progress has been made in nursing and midwifery over the past
several decades, especially in the area of education. Countries have either
developed new, or strengthened and re-oriented the existing nursing educational
programmes in order to ensure that the graduates have the essential competence
to make effective contributions in improving people’s health and quality of life.
As a result nursing education has made rapid qualitative advances. However,
the expected comparable improvements in the quality of nursing service have
not taken place as rapidly.
 Reduce gap between nursing education and nursing services.
  The gap between nursing practice and education has its historical roots in the
  separation of nursing schools from the control of hospitals to which they
  were attached. At the time when schools of nursing were operated by
  hospitals, it was students who are largely staffed the wards and learned the
  practice of nursing under the guidance of the nursing staff. The creation of
  separate institutions for nursing education with independent administrative
  structures, budget and staff was therefore considered necessary in order to
  provide an effective educational environment towards enhancing students
  learning experiences and laying the foundation for further educational
  development.
 Graduate nurses often lack practical skills despite their significant
  knowledge of nursing process and theory.
  Advanced education imparts knowledge. But, it has also had adverse effects.
  The nurse educators are no longer practicing nursing in the wards. As a
  result they are not delivering quality nursing care services directly to the
  people. Also their practical skill gets reduced. Theory with practice increases
  our knowledge, critical thinking etc. The practicing nurses have little
  opportunity to share their practical knowledge with students due to their
  busy work. As the gap between education and practice has widened, there
  are now significant differences between what is taught in the class room and
  what is practiced in the service settings.
 Collaboration is a very essential component in nursing.
  Nurses as the single largest health care provider group and the group with
  the most sustained contact with patients, have opportunities and
  responsibilities to use their communication and teaching skills to facilitate
  patient collaboration in their care.
   Collaboration helps to improve patient outcome.
    Collaboration practice provides more effective care delivery and better use
    of resources and enhances job satisfaction. It also reduces conflict between
    physicians and nurses as both become more focused on patient outcomes
    than on protecting their own ‘turf.
  V.    TYPES OF COLLABORATION
                          INTERDISCIPLINARY
MULTIDISCIPLINARY                                    TRANSDISCIPLINARY
                         INTERPROFESSIONAL
  1. Interdisciplinary collaboration
     Interdisciplinary is the term used to indicate the combining of two or more
     disciplines, professions, departments etc. usually in regard to practice,
     research, education and/ or theory.
  2. Multidisciplinary collaboration
     Multidisciplinary refers to independent work and decision making such as
     when disciplines work side-by-side on a problem. The interdisciplinary
     process, according to Garner (1995) and Hoeman (1996), expands the
     multidisciplinary team process through collaborative communication rather
     than shared communication.
  3. Transdisciplinary collaboration
     Transdisciplinary efforts involve multiple disciplines sharing together their
     knowledge and skills across traditional disciplinary boundaries in
     accomplishing tasks or goals (Hoeman, 1996). Transdisciplinary efforts
     reflect a process by which individuals work together to develop a shared
     conceptual framework that integrates and extends discipline specific
     theories, concepts and methods to address a common problem.
  4. Interprofessional collaboration
     It has been described as involving “ interactions of two or more disciplines
     involving professionals who work together, with intention, mutual respect
     and commitments for the sake of a more adequate response to a human
     problem” (Harbaugh,1994). Interprofessional collaboration goes beyond
   transdisciplinary to include not just traditional discipline boundaries but also
   professional identities and traditional roles. Interdisciplinary collaboration
   team members transcend separate disciplinary perspectives and attempt to
   weave together resources such as tools, methods and procedures to address
   common problems or concerns.
VI.   KEY ELEMENTS OF COLLABORATION
   Collaboration implies that health care team members work cohesively.
   Elements associated with effective collaboration include cooperation,
   assertiveness, responsibility, communication, autonomy and coordination.
 Cooperation: It is respecting the opinions of others and being willing to
  examine alternative points of views and changed personal beliefs and
  personal prospective.
 Assertiveness: It exists when individual in the team support each other and
  all viewpoints are aired fully and the consensus can be achieved within the
  team.
 Shared responsibility: It supports a decision that is determined by
  consensus and ultimately participating in implementation of a plan.
 Communication: Each team member is responsible for sharing critical
  information about patient care and issue relevant to clinical decision making.
  Communication must be appropriate and timely.
 Coordination: It is the efficient organization of the necessary components
  of care, coordination reduces duplication of effort and guarantee that the
  most qualified person will address a problem or task important to the work
  of the disciplinary team. Collaboration is based on concepts of purposes,
  professional contribution of practitioners, collegiality, communication and
  patient focused practice.
 Collegiality: It emphasis on mutual respect and professional approach to
  inter –team problems rather than blaming others or avoiding responsibility
  for one’s own error.
VII. MODELS OF COLLABORATION BETWEEN EDUCATION AND
      SERVICE
  The nursing literature presents several collaboration models that have
  emerged between educational institution and client agencies as a means to
  integrate education, practice and research initiatives as well as providing a
  vehicle by which the theory practice gap is bridged and best practice
  outcome are achieved.
   1) Clinical School of Nursing model (1995)
It is one that encompasses the highest level of academic and clinical nursing
research and education. This was the concept of visionary nurses from both La
Trobe and ‘The Alfred Clinical School of Nursing University’. This occurred
within a concern of long history of collaboration cooperation between these two
institutions going back many years and the establishment of the Clinical School in
February, 1995. The development of the Clinical School offers benefits to both
hospital and university. It brings academic staff to the hospital, with opportunity for
exchange of ideas with clinical nurses with increased opportunities for clinical
nursing research. Many educational openings for expert clinical nurses to become
involved with the university’s academic program were evolved. The move to the
concept of the clinical school is founded on reorganization of the fundamental
importance of the close and continuing link the theory and practice of nursing at all
levels.
 2. Dedicated Education Unit Clinical Teaching Model (1999)
 In this model, a partnership of nurses executives, staff nurses and faculty
transformed patient care units into environments of support for nursing students
and staff nurse while continuity of the critical work of providing quality care to
acutely ill adult. Various methods were used to obtain formative data during the
implementation of this model in which staff nurses assumed the role of nursing
instructor. Result showed high student and nurse satisfaction and marked increase
in clinical capacity the allowed for increase enrolment. Key features of the DEU
are:-
    Uses existing resources
    Supports the professional development of nurses.
    Potential recruiting and retention tool.
    Allows for the clinical education of increased number of students.
    Exclusive use of the clinical unit by school of nursing.
    Use of staff nurses who want to reach as clinical instructor.
    Preparation of clinical instructor for their teaching role through collaborative
     staff and faculty development activities.
    Faculty role to work directly with staff as a coach, collaboration,
     teaching/learning resources to develop clinical resourcing skill, to identify
     clinical expectations of students evaluate students achievements.
   3. The Collaborative Approach to Nursing Care (CAN-Care) Model
      (2006)
   The CAN-Care model emerged as academic and practical leaders acknowledge
   the need to work together to pronounce the education, recruitment, and retention
   of nurses at all stages of their career. The idea of partnership model emerged
   when the Christian E. Lynn College of Nursing, Florida, Atlantic University,
   was awarded a grant from Tenet health Care Foundation Accelerated Second
   degree BSN Program.
       Goal:
    The goal was to design an educationally dense, practice based experience to
     socialize second-degree students to the role of professional nurse
    A secondary goal was to enhance and support the professional and career
     development of unit based nurses.
    A commitment to a constructivist approach to learning an immersion
     experience to recognize the unique needs of accelerated second degree
     learner, and
 To emphasis the partnership among the academic and practice setting, were
  guiding forces in the creation.
   The model emerged from a dialogue among leaders from the academic and
   practice setting focusing on the areas of expertise and potential contributions
   of each partner. The essence of the CAN-Care model is the relationship
   between the nurse learner (student) Care and nurse expert within the context
   of each nursing situation. The semantics of the based nursing student as
   learner and unit based nurse as expert. The learner is responsible and
   accountable for engaging in the learning process and for work talking an
   active role in establishing a dynamic learning partnership with the nurse
   expert. Unit-based nurse are expert in the work of nursing care. The title
   unit-based nurse expert was chosen to recognize the grifts they engage in a
   partnership for the purpose of nurse meeting the need of the assigned patient
   population as well as to reflect on and to come to know the different models
   of collaboration between Nursing Education and Art and Science of Nursing
   Practice. The faculty member promotes the growth of the nurse expert as a
   professional and the journey of the learner in coming to know a career in
   nursing. This is a major change in focus from the traditional role of faculty
   change being in control of the teaching of students.
   By the application of CAN-care model the focus is to:
 Care student’s activities moves from demonstration of discrete skills and
  prescribed outcome to an immersion into the professional nurse role, learner
  to hear and respond the patient needs.
 Through this model the students come to know the organizational context of
  nursing practice, the multifaceted role of professional nurse and assume
  responsibility for coming to know the meaning of nursing in each unique
  situation.
 The unit-based nurse acquires new skills based in mentoring, exposure to
  evidences with the college.
 This approach to education in the practice setting is thought to be more
  consistent with the educational needs of nurses who are preparing for the
  challenges of professional practice in today’s acute care setting.
   The primary role of the faculty member in the model is to nurture the nurse
   expert/nurse learner relationship and to support the growth and development
   of both expert and learner in their respective roles and responsibilities. The
   on-site faculty member becomes an advisor, resource, role model and
   educator for both the nurse expert and the nurse learner. Here the health care
   organization becomes active participant in creating learning environment
   and contributing to the learning activities.
    3. The Bridge to Practice Model (2008)
    Key features of model:
    First, students complete all of the clinical experiences in one participating
    hospital.
   Second, one full-time teaching faculty serves as a liaison for each bridge
    hospital.
   This faculty member is given a space, usually in the nursing education
    department, and is then available to serve as a resource for not only the
    clinical associates but also for the hospital nursing staff.
   In this model, therefore, there can be numerous clinical associates in one
    hospital with one full-time. University faculty over-seeing the clinical
    experiences.
   Third, students are actively involved in selecting their clinical placements.
    The bridge to practice model proposed by Catholic University of America,
    School of Nursing (2008), uses a cohort approach in which student
    completes medical-surgical clinical nursing education at the same faculty.
   Students must apply for clinical placement in the hospital of their choice via
    a clinical application form.
   Clinical placement decisions are based on academic performance and
    maturational level.
   Participating students undergo 415 hours of clinical experiences focused on
    medical surgical nursing.
    These clinical practices progress from adults in health and illness, Basic, an
    introductory nursing course to Medical Surgical nursing leadership, a senior
    level course taken in the last semester of baccalaureate study.
                        Thus the bridge to Practice Model provides
    undergraduates nursing students with continuity in Medical Surgical
    education through placement in the same hospital for all medical surgical
    clinical rotation. Hospital that participates in the bridge model provides
    senior clinical nurse preceptors whose time is paid for by the university. The
    bridge to practice model emphasizes professional incentives for hospital
    nurse to participate in nursing education. Planned incentives includes the
    rewarding of hospital nurse with continuing education credits for
    participation in the short –term training on educational methodology and
    approaches. A tuition discount is offered for graduates course work at the
    university for institutional students and faculty, more involvement with
    clinical support services and care management, and more informed
    employment choices by senior students.
           Challenges Include:-
 Recruitment of interested senior clinical nurses
 Retention of clinical liaison faculty.
 Management of the tradeoff between institutional stability offered by
  clinical site continuity.
 The variety of experiences offered by rotation several clinical settings.
    The gap between nursing practice and education has its historical roots in the
    separation of nursing school from the control of hospital to which they were
    attached. At the time when school of nursing operated by hospital, it was the
    students who largely staffed the ward and learned the practice of nursing
    under the guidance of the nursing staff. While this separation has been
    beneficial in advancing nursing education, it has also had adverse effects.
 Under the divided system, the nurse educations are no longer the practicing
  nurse in the wards or directly involved in the delivery of nursing services,
  not responsible for the quality of care.
 The practicing nurses have little opportunity to share their practical
  knowledge with students and no longer share the responsibility for ensuring
  the relevance of the training
 As the gap between education and practice has widened, there are now
  significant differences between what is taught in the class room and what is
  practiced in the service setting.
   The need for greater collaboration nursing education and services call for
   urgent attention
          The majority of these models are based on a joint appointment model
   where the nurse is initially employed by a health services or a university and
   divides his or her time between teaching and clinical practice, Application of
   these models can reduce the provided gap between education and service in
   nursing thereby can help in the development of competent and efficient
   nurses for the betterment of nursing profession.
  4. NURSE CONSULTANT MODEL
   Collaboration for in service/ Continuing education programs
          The key ingredient is a partnership between educational and nursing
   service institutions and personal. Partnership relationship combines the
   strength of the practical application knowledge from nursing service sector
   and education/theoretical knowledge from educational sector.
   The benefits of collaboration              in   nursing     education     and
   understanding practice:
 It provides assistance in staff development program and conducting in
  service and continuing educational program.
 Aim is to further education and smooth functioning of peer profession
 Leads to flexible options for incorporating new ideas, new approaches, in
  nursing practice and nursing education
 Accessible to nurses who are unable , not ready or not interested in further
  formal education
 Ex-nursing updates, workshops, etc. conducted by nursing students.
  5. Mutual Interaction Model of Collaboration
   Williamson has proposed mutual interaction as a model for maximizing
   patient participation in the health care process. Mutual interaction as a model
   combines collaborative aims with the decision-making framework of the
   nursing process. The model not only endeavors to involve patients in their
   own care, it assures through their participation that patients assume a greater
   proportion of the responsibility for the outcomes of care than would be the
   case were they to take an entirely passive role.
          Mutual interactions as a model combines collaboration aims with the
   decision making framework of the nursing Process. It provides a method for
   simultaneously, building concerns and solving problems by its integrations
   of negotiation and decision making through verb, and non-verbal exchanges
   patient and nurse comes to agreement on the desired outcomes and stragies
   to be employed for promoting and restoring the patient, health.
   Assumptions
 The individual has a right to self-determination and choose to participate in
  the process of decision making.
 The patient and the professional interact in a relationship and are amenable
  to each other’s influences.
 The responsibility for health is a professional one, not a professional one.
 Each individual, concept of health is legitimate for that person.
   Phases of The Mutual Interaction Model
              Phase                                           Activity
          Exploratory               The patient states reasons for seeking care expectations
                                    for general out comes. In this phase the nurse encourages
                                    the patient to share the story of his and her illness to state
                                    the reasons of seeking care. The nurse states the services
                                    he or she is able to provide. Patient and nurse decide
                                    whether patient desires and expectations matchwith the
                                    nurse skills,they explore the options to proceed refer or
                                    terminate.
          Information               The patient and nurse define the patient problems and
          sharing and               identity the available resources
          analysis
                                    The patient and nurse each states his/her objectives for
          Mutual     post           care and negotiates specific outcomes. Patient and nurse
          settings                  define their respective roles in meeting patient care
                                    outcomes. Skills. For goal be attainable. They must reflect
                                    the patient value belief system, resources and skills A
                                    patient seeking a quick solution to health problem will be
                                    unlikely to attain outcomes that requires long-term
                                    measures.
              Phase                                        Activity
          Strategy                  The patient and nurse explore strategies and discuss
          devising                  the risks and benefit of strategies considered. Patient
                                    and nurse reach an agreement on strategies and arrive
                                    at a patient acre contact. In this phase, nurses and
                                    patient jointly select strategies to reach mutually
                                    defied outcomes. Exchange focus on benefits. Cost
                                    and risks of alternative strategies and on the probable
                                    consequences of any given course of action in light of
                                    the patient particular situation.
          Implementation            The patient and nurse do a formative evaluation of
          of alternatives           care in progress, they exchange information needed in
                                    order to make ongoing adjustments in the plan.
                                    Corrective changes are made concurrently with the
                                    implementation of care.
        Evaluation                  The patient and nurse review the patient care
                                    experience, they share information needed to make a
                                    summative, evaluative and prepare to terminate the
                                    contract.
   LIMITATIONS OF MUTUAL INTERACTION
 Patient role expectations: Patients sick role perceptions influence the role
  they expect to play in nurse-patient encounters. Previous experience gives
  patients a sense of what to expect that may act as a strong influence on their
  behavior.
 Patient knowledge: Patient socialized to take the dependent role, may defer
  to nurse, expert knowledge. This is particularly true when patients believe
  they lack the knowledge necessary for decision making. Once they are
  provided with the information, many patients become willing and able to
  participate.
 Patient personality characteristics: Patients differ from one another in
  their personal traits and characteristics. Some patients naturally acquire or
  develop a stronger internal locus of control and a stronger sense of self-
  efficacy than others. Patients with these characteristics are more likely to
  seek out a collaborative arrangement in the health care encounter.
 Patient definition of the situation: Patients look for cues and symbols that
  indicate the social norms and sanction for specific behavior. These define
  action in formal and informal situations. Interpretations of social cues vary.
Thus, it is necessary provides to understand the patient definition of the
situation and whether that definition is compatible with collaboration.
These factors influence initial patient responses to collaboration which may
range from enthusiasm to bewilderment to distress. Although patient
characteristics determine Patient, tendency to participate, nurse,
characteristics influence the degree to which a patient is invited or given
permission or to participate.
6. Research Joint Appointments (Clinical Chair) (2000)
   A joint Appointment has been defined by Lantz et al. (1994), as “ a
   formalised agreement between two institutions where an individual holds
   a position in each institution and carries out specific and defined
   responsibilities.”
         The goal of this approach is to use the implementation of research
   findings as a basis for improving critical thinking and clinical decision-
   making of nurses. In this arrangement, the researcher is a faculty member
   at the educational institution with credibility in conducting research and
   with an interest in developing a research programme in the clinical
   setting. The Director of Nursing Research, provides education regarding
   research and assists with the conduct of research in the practice setting.
   She/he also lectures or supervises in the educational institution. A formal
   agreement exists within the two organizations regarding specific
   responsibilities and the percentage of time allocated between each. Salary
   and benefits are shared between the two organisations.
              Outcomes identified by Donnelly, Warfel and Wolfe (1994) for
   the educational institution are that it becomes more in touch with the real
   world and more readily able to identify research questions, that have the
   potential to make a difference to quality of consumer care delivery. There
   is also an increasing collaborative relationship with the service provider
   which is important for long term workforce planning. The clinical chair
   also facilitates improved access and support to external research project
   funding.
7. Practice- Research Model(PRM) (2001)
   It is an innovative collaborative partnership agreement between Fremantle
   Hospital and Health Service and Curtin University of Technology in
   Perth, Western Australia. The partnership engages academics in the
   clinical setting in two formalized collaborative appointments. This
   partnership not only enhances communication between educational and
   health services, but fosters the development of nursing research and
   knowledge.
              The process of the collaborative partnership agreement involved
   the development of a Practice- Research Model (PRM) of collaboration.
   This model encouraged a close working relationship between registered
      nurses and academics, and has also facilitated strong links at the health
      service with the Nursing Research and Evaluation Unit, medical staff and
      other allied health professionals.
      Key elements underlying the process of collaboration and development of
      the PRM are:-
 Collaborative partnership- The collaborative partnership was formed by
   nursing health professionals, from the community health service and the
   university who recognized the need to bridge the theory- clinical practice
   gap and acknowledged the futility of continuing to work in isolation from
   each other. In practical terms, this involved a formal contractual
   arrangement between the organizations that led to the establishment of a
   Nurse Research Consultant position.
 Core values and aims of the collaborative partnership- Before the actual
   framework of the collaborative partnership was decided, a literature review
   of the most common models of collaboration in nursing practice was used to
   promote discussion between the organizations to clarify and formalize the
   assumptions underlying the core values, roles and responsibilities of the
   partners, as indicated by Spross (1989). During this phase, four key concepts
   emerged: firstly, that ‘practice drives research’, secondly, the principle of
   ‘collegial partnership’, thirdly, ‘collaborative ownership’ and finally, ‘best
   practice’.
  8. Collaborative Clinical Education Epworth Deakin (CCEED)
      model(2003)
  In an effort to improve the quality of new graduate transition, Epworth
  Hospital and Deakin University ran a collaborative project (2003) funded by
  National Safety and Quality Council to improve the support base for new
  graduates while managing the quality of patient care delivery. The CCEED
  model developed to facilitate clinical learning, promote clinical scholarship
  and build nurse workforce capability. The CCEED undergraduate program
  sees undergraduate nursing students attending lectures at Deakin University
  in the traditional manner but completing all tutorials, clinical learning
  laboratories and clinical placements at Epworth Hospital throughout their
  three year course. Tutorials, laboratories and clinical placements are
  conducted by Epworth clinicians who are prepared and supported by Deakin
  School of Nursing faculty. These clinicians also support the student-preceptor
  relationship in the clinical learning component of the curriculum. The
  expectation was that increased integration between hospital and university
  would enhance clinical education resulting in improved student’s application
  of knowledge and skills as well as increased socialization to the clinician
  role.
  Key findings of the 2005 pilot CCEED program were
    Students learning objectives were met and satisfaction was high.
    Undergraduate clinical education was valued by preceptors and
     managers as a workforce investment strategy.
    Preceptors were enriched in their clinician role as a result of their
     participation in the program and reflection on the process.
    Preceptor continuity promoted a trusting relationship that enabled
     preceptors to confidently encourage student initiative.
    Preceptors managed multiple roles in order to meet demands of patient
     care and student learning.
9. The collaborative Learning Unit(British Columbia) Model, 2005
This model was based on the ‘Dedicated Education Units’ concept
developed, successfully implemented and researched in Australia. The
Collaborative Learning Unit Model of practice education for nursing is a
clinical education alternative to preceptorship. In the CLU model, students
practice and learn on a nursing unit, each following an individual set rotation
and choosing their learning assignment, according to their learning plans. All
nursing staff members on the Collaborative Learning Unit are involved in
this model and therefore not only do the students gain a wide variety of
knowledge but the unit also has the ability to provide practice experiences for
a large number of students.
10. Collaboration of Nursing Education and Service in India
The gap between nursing practice and education has its historical roots in the in
the separation of nursing schools from the control of hospitals to which they
were attached. At the time when schools of nursing were operated by hospitals,
it was the students who largely staffed the wards and learned the practice of
nursing under the guidance of nursing staff. However, service needs often took
precedence over student’s learning needs.
        There are two institutions which are practicing dual role, education and
practice: NIMHANS, Bangalore and CMC, vellore. The models of these
institutions will help to improve the quality of Nursing Education with overall
objective of improving the quality of nursing care to the patients and community
people.
a) Dual role model of NIMHANS
Following the amalgamation of 1974 resulting in NIMHANS, the faculty of the
nursing department took up the dual responsibility of providing clinical services
as well as conducting teaching programs. In 1975, all the Grade II nursing
superintendents working in the hospital were designated tutors to maintain
uniformity in the department. Combined workshops were conducted under the
guidance of WHO consultant Mrs. Morril to prepare the tutors who came from
Grade II Nursing Superintendent cadre for teaching purpose and to make the
Lectures and tutors associated with educational programmes (DPN course and
9-month course in psychiatric nursing) comfortable with clinical supervision.
After both groups felt comfortable to assume the dual responsibility, the areas of
supervision were designated. The Head of the Department of Nursing was given
the responsibility for both the service and the education component of the
department.
           Integration with education with service raised the quality of patient
care and also improved the quality of learning experiences for nursing students,
under the close supervision of teachers who were also practitioners.
b) Integrative Service – Education approach in CMC, Vellore.
 College of Nursing under Christian Medical College, Vellore, where nursing
educators are practicing in the wards or directly involving in the delivery of
nursing services. This enables the practicing nurse to share her practical
knowledge to the student nurse who is practicing in the concerned wards.
          Government of India conducted a pilot study on bridging the gap
between education and service in selected institutions like one ward of AIIMS.
The project was successful, patients and medical personnel appreciated the
move but it required financial resources to replicate this process.
SUMMARY
  So far we discussed about the collaboration issues and models in nursing.
Collaboration means collegial working relationship with another health care
provider in the provision of patient care. The objectives include provide client
directed and centered care using multidisciplinary, integrated, participative
framework. The characteristics of effective collaboration include clinical
competence of each provider, humor, trust etc. benefits of collaborative care
include competencies basic to collaboration, communication skills, mutual respect
and trust. Effective steps for collaboration includes clearly identify the value link to
the organization strategies etc. The collaborative model (or conversational model)
is a theory for explaining how speaking and understanding work in conversation,
specifically how people in conversation coordinate to determine definite references.
CONCLUSION
Estimating the future need for registered nurse with various educational
backgrounds is complicated by differing perception of educators and employers
about the appropriate base of knowledge and skill new graduates need. These
differences began to be apparent when nursing education moved away from its
historical base in hospitals response to abuses and inadequacies. Collaborative care
as a partnership relationship between doctors, nurses and other health care
providers with patients and their families. It is a process by which health care
professionals work together with clients to achieve quality health care outcomes.
Mutual respect and a true sharing of both power and control are essential elements.
Ideally collaboration becomes a dynamic, interactive process in which clients offer
with physicians, nurses and other health care providers to meet their health
objectives.
      BIBLIOGRAPHY
      1. Navdeep Kaur Brar. Text book of advanced nursing practice. New Delhi:
         Jaypee publishers;2015. Page number 984-995
      2. Shebeer P Basheer. Yaseen Khan. A Concised text book of advanced
         nursing practice. Emmes publication; page number 698-707
      3. Sudha R. Nursing Education Principles and Concepts.New Delhi: Jaypee
         publishers; 2013.Page number 339-342
      4. Jaspreet Kaur Sodhi. Comprehensive Textbook of Nursing Education.
         New Delhi: Jaypee brothers publishers; 2017. Page number 450-457
      5. www.currentnursing.com
      6. www.nursingmodels.com
      7. www.collaborativemodels.com