See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/319650774

Building Personal Brands with Digital Storytelling ePortfolios

Article · January 2017

CITATIONS READS
2 218

2 authors, including:

Beata Lobert Jones

Texas Christian University
12 PUBLICATIONS   66 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

ePortfolio View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Beata Lobert Jones on 12 September 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

International Journal of ePortfolio 2017, Volume 7, Number 1, 67-91
http://www.theijep.com ISSN 2157-622X

Building Personal Brands with Digital Storytelling ePortfolios

Beata Jones and Carrie Leverenz
Texas Christian Univiersity

Antoine de Saint-Exupery said, “If you want to build a ship, don’t drum up people to collect wood
and don’t assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the
sea.” This article presents a pedagogical approach for framing a digital-identity-enhancing ePortfolio
that maximizes student engagement and produces a high-quality ePortfolio artifact. Building on the
work of Lambert (2002), Barrett (2005), Klein (2013), Ramirez (2011), Nguyen (2013), Kahn
(2014), Khedher (2014) and others, the authors have developed a technology- and pedagogy-based
digital storytelling ePortfolio framework that helps students craft a digital identity and communicate
a personal brand. When ePortfolio assignments provide opportunities for self-exploration that
include creating a personal brand, students engage with and appreciate the importance of their work,
as evidenced in our pilot study of second- through fourth-year students in a university honors
colloquium. Furthermore, this personal branding approach extends existing ePortfolio models by
helping students develop key twenty-first century metaskills (Neumeier, 2013), while also enhancing
their human and social capital.

In the last two decades, the use of ePortfolios to ePortfolio advocates Barrett and Carney (2005), who
foster and assess learning in courses, programs, and questioned whether, in the name of assessment, we
across institutions has flourished. A recent editorial by might be losing a “powerful tool to support deep
Rhodes, Chen, Watson, and Garrison (2014) in the learning” (para. 5). Batson (2007) used the word
International Journal of ePortfolio reports that more than “hijacked” to describe the appropriation of ePortfolios
40% of colleges and universities use ePortfolios in some for purposes other than student-centered learning.
way. The expanding use of ePortfolios can be attributed Although Cambridge (2010) and others have argued
to a confluence of factors affecting higher education, that ePortfolios can serve both institutional and student
including the need to update pedagogical methods to interests, the case remains that, as with any
better address the participatory learning preferences of requirement, ePortfolios risk being seen by students as
21st century students, increased access to Web 2.0 merely a requirement. For ePortfolios to be of
technologies (e.g., mobile computing devices, social maximum value, faculty should take into consideration
media platforms, wireless connectivity) that support not just course learning outcomes but also students’
participatory learning, as well as calls for colleges and interests in creating portfolios.
universities to provide clear evidence of what students When ePortfolio creation is motivated by students’
learn (Bass, 2012, 2013; Clark & Eynon, 2009). desire to showcase their capabilities for potential
ePortfolios, in which students document, reflect on, and employers, graduate school admission counselors, or
integrate their learning in digital spaces, often for public some external audience, students respond much more
audiences, are especially suited to meet these demands. enthusiastically. Fortunately, if the assignment is
As virtually all published accounts of ePortfolio use structured well, a showcase portfolio can still serve
make clear, their success, whether to foster deep learning multiple purposes, resulting in what is often referred to
or to facilitate more authentic assessment, depends on as a hybrid ePortfolio. For example, a hybrid portfolio
how ePortfolios are implemented (Eynon, Gambino, & can not only showcase student achievement but also
Török, 2014a). Early research suggests that the adoption function as an assessment portfolio by capturing the key
of ePortfolios has helped institutions meet objectives competencies needed for institutional, programmatic, or
such as increasing retention and improving assessment of course evaluation. Importantly, students who produce a
learning (Eynon, Gambino, & Török, 2014b). Faculty, portfolio for an external audience in addition to an
too, report that the use of ePortfolios in their courses has internal audience put forth more effort and produce
facilitated deeper learning for students. Unfortunately, better outcomes, expecting that others might view,
students themselves may not see ePortfolios as positively evaluate, use, or even cite their work (Hubert,
as do teachers and administrators. The 2014 ECAR Pickavance, & Hyberger, 2015; Ramirez, 2011).
Study of Undergraduate Students and Information
Technology found that ePortfolios were one of only two Literature Review
technologies (the other was social media) that students
wished teachers would use less of (Dahlstrom, Brooks, & Digital Identity
Bischel, 2014).
That institutional interest in ePortfolios may In recent years, there has been an expanded interest in
conflict with students’ interests was addressed early by examining the role of ePortfolio in identity formation,
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 68

helping students develop a sense of self as a learner and A brand evokes an emotional response to the image
future professional, based on their values, beliefs, or name of a particular company, product, or person
accomplishments, and needs (Belshaw, 2012, Kehoe & (Deckers & Lacey, 2011). The development of a
Goudzwaard, 2015; Klein, 2013, Nguyen, 2013, Ramirez, personal brand, if it is to be similarly compelling to an
2011). Several authors exploring identity have cited audience, requires an understanding of one’s current
Goffman (1959) who considered identity as s a view of professional identity, a formation of targeted
self that is constructed by the performance the individual communications for external audiences, and an
gives in front of others (Buckingham, 2008; Code, 2013; understanding of effective channels for communication
Jenkins, 2004; Koole & Parchoma, 2013). This with the target audience (Ward & Yates, 2013), followed
performance is a product of biography, the social context, by a subsequent evaluation of how well the image
and the people an individual interacts with (Buckingham, created is fulfilling one’s goals (Khedher, 2014). The
2008). ePortfolios can facilitate student identity formation fear is that if one does not manage one’s personal brand
as they engage in the process of reflection and self- effectively, someone else might do it for them
authoring. ePortfolios likewise contribute to the shaping of (Rampersad, 2008; Solove, 2008). Like product brands,
one’s digital identity, or who a person is assumed to be personal branding also requires positioning one’s brand
based on the permanent collection of a person’s data that is in a different way than the competition, while doing it
available online. Williams, Fleming, Lundqvist, and with integrity, authenticity, and consistency (Ward &
Parslow (2013) described digital identity as “a persona an Yates, 2013). Taking into account a person’s values,
individual presents across all the digital communities that beliefs, and needs, a personal brand typically includes a
he/she is represented in” (p. 106). It “reflects how the mission and vision statement, a brand statement, and
individual is viewed, and thus impacts on the way they tagline, clearly distinguishing one’s brand from one’s
work and their reputation within their communities” identity. A strong personal brand relies on a strong online
(Williams et al., 2013, p. 106). As digital identities become presence that communicates the brand elements and
increasingly complex and scattered across the web, an authentically reflects an individual’s strengths, beliefs,
ePortfolio can be a valuable means of bringing coherence and aspirations. Labrecque, Markos, and Milne (2011)
to the digital self an individual presents. Through observe that “in the age of Web 2.0, self-branding tactics
reflection and self-authorship, students can craft a involve creating and maintaining social and networking
compelling narrative based on their values, beliefs, and profiles, personal websites, and blogs, as well as using
experiences. However, given students’ increased search engine optimization techniques to encourage
motivation when composing for an external audience access to one’s information” (p. 39.) Because robust
(Hubert et al., 2015; Ramirez, 2011), a more appealing personal branding relies not only on impression
approach to an ePortfolio might be to ask students to build management (Cunningham, 2013) but also on a
their personal brand rather than digital identity. narrative, bringing storytelling elements to one’s brand
building is important to personal branding success.
Personal Brand
Storytelling
Less than two decades ago, Peters (1997) started
the conversation about personal branding with a book Humans have long used stories to make sense of
called The Brand Called You, leading to a stream of their experience and to communicate the significance of
publications, magazines, websites, training programs, that experience to others. Stories add purpose, meaning
and training coaches aimed at job seekers and young and value to life. They entertain, facilitate
people in general (e.g., Arruda & Dixson, 2007; understanding, help us find connections between ideas,
Chritton, 2012; McNally & Speak, 2002; Montoya, and motivate action. While historians, philosophers,
2002; Schwabel, 2009). These resources offer advice anthropologists, and literary critics have studied the
and tool-kits to help people build personal brands and, ways in which narratives convey human values, more
consequently, “gain influence as others may view you recently, scholars have suggested that narrative
as effective, well-connected, powerful, knowledgeable, structures are also key to processing, storing, and
and up to date” (Hernez-Broome, McLaughlin, & retrieving information. Bruner (1991) has observed
Trovas, 2009, p. 20), which can lead to advancing one’s “that narrative comprehension is among the earliest
position in the labor market. According to Du Gay powers of mind to appear in the young child and among
(1996), a personal brand has a return in terms of human, the most widely used forms of organizing human
social, and ultimately, economic capital development. experience” (p. 9). Schank (1990), an artificial
Given the educational and practical relevance of intelligence researcher, argued similarly:
developing a personal brand, branding principles have
already made their way into some undergraduate and People think in terms of stories. They understand
graduate curricula (e.g., Wetsch, 2012). the world in terms of stories that they have already
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 69

Table 1
Telling Your Digital Story (Leverenz, 2014)
Digital storytelling element (Lambert,2002) Explanation
1. Point of view “The main point of the story and the perspective of the author in
relation to the story.”
2. A dramatic question “A key question that keeps the viewer’s attention and will be
answered by the end of the story.”
3. Emotional content “Serious issues that come alive in a personal and powerful way and
connect the audience emotionally to the story.”
4. The gift of your voice “A way to personalize the story to help the audience understand the
context and to get a stronger sense of the person behind the story.”
5. The power of the soundtrack “Music or other sounds that support and embellish the story.”

6. Economy “Using just enough content to tell the story without overloading the
viewer.”
7. Pacing “The rhythm of the story and how slowly or quickly it progresses.”

understood. New events or problems are Fletcher & Cambre, 2009; Jenkins & Lonsdale, 2007;
understood by reference to old previously McDrury & Alterio, 2003; Oppermann, 2008; Porter,
understood stories and explained to others by the 2004; Ramist, Doerr-Stevens, & Jacobs, 2010; Robin,
use of stories. We understand personal problems 2006, 2008; Yang & Wu, 2012). Principles of digital
and relationships between people through stories storytelling such as those promoted by Lambert (2002),
that typify those situations. We also understand just founder of Storycenter (formerly the Center for Digital
about everything else this way as well. (p. 219) Storytelling), bring together narrative strategies and
digital media to help people share their experiences.
While there is not yet clear agreement on why our While digital storytelling typically refers to a brief,
brains have evolved to be particularly attuned to narrative, emotionally compelling, video-based narrative, created
there is little question that the human capacity for through an assemblage of still images, video clips,
storytelling has played an important role in our evolution as music, and voice-over narration, we use the term here
a species. It is not surprising, then, that reading, writing, to refer to the more conceptual elements of a digital
telling, and listening to stories have become valuable story, namely, that it engages an audience through an
educational practices. Stories enable us both to know and to intentionally arranged description of events over time
express what we know. We might even say that when we and that it does so digitally, using multiple modes of
compose a narrative, whether in an effort to understand expression. Digital media add richness to the story as
ourselves or others, we are not simply reflecting reality but well as shape the story, benefiting the reflection and the
creating it (Bruner, 1991, p. 13). As Bruner (1991) reminds emotional impact the story delivers. Digital stories
us, storytelling involves selecting and ordering information, require mastering not only the storytelling craft but also
an act that necessarily involves interpretation. As such, the technologies needed to deliver effectively elements
“some measure of agency is always present in narrative, and of digital storytelling, such as those recommended by
agency presupposes choice—some element of ‘freedom’” Lambert (2002) and presented in Table 1.
(Bruner, 1991, p. 7). While all stories, from the simplest Digital storytelling promotes the development of
picture book to the most complex historical treatise, share competences such as research and writing skills,
the essential features of characters situated in a specific organization skills, technology skills, presentation skills,
context who engage in action over time in order to solve a interpersonal skills, problem-solving skills, and critical
problem or resolve a conflict, it is we who decide what story thinking. In turn, students also develop digital literacy,
we want to tell. technology literacy, visual literacy, and information
literacy (Bass & Oppermann, 2005, Cradler, McNabb,
Digital Storytelling Freeman, & Burchett, 2002; Robin 2006). Because digital
storytelling involves an interdisciplinary integration of
With the advent of personal computing, digital critical thought and creative practice, it has been hailed by
cameras, and more recently, Web 2.0 tools and mobile many as a signature pedagogy of the New Humanities
devices, digital storytelling has gained in widespread (Benmayor, 2008). When students use digital storytelling,
popularity (Abrahamson, 1998; Alexander, 2011; they learn to “convert data into information and transform
Benmayor, 2008; Bernard, 2006; Coventry, 2008; information into knowledge” (Cradler et al., 2002, p. 3).
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 70

Proponents of digital storytelling have found that students’ ePortfolios appeal to students’ interest in creative self-
investment in creating a compelling story and the expression; (b) helping students see ePortfolios as a
challenge of doing so using unfamiliar modes and space for self-authorship and identity formation
technologies can help them meet designated learning (Cambridge, 2010; Klein, 2013; Nguyen, 2013;
outcomes. Such benefits can also extend to students who Ramirez, 2011; Yancey, 2013); (c) maximizing
engage in digital storytelling in the context of an ePortfolios as a form of social pedagogy (Bass, 2014;
ePortfolio. Unfortunately, without explicit guidance on Eynon et al., 2014a; Klein, 2013; Nguyen, 2013;
how to use an ePortfolio to tell an effective story, students Ramirez, 2011); and (d) taking advantage of the digital
may treat the construction of a portfolio as merely a hoop affordances of ePortfolios to encourage the
to jump through. development of 21st century communication skills
(Bass, 2012; Clark & Eynon, 2009; Gallagher &
Digital Storytelling ePortfolios Poklop, 2014; Kahn, 2014; Klein, 2013). Increased
student engagement in ePortfolio creation can lead both
As early as 2005, teacher and teacher educator to better learning and to the development of a more
Barrett demonstrated how digital storytelling and compelling personal brand.
ePortfolios together enhance classroom learning. Our
approach to ePortfolios, which emphasized digital Method
storytelling for the purpose of creating and
communicating a personal brand, directly extends prior Our goal in this article is to describe a pedagogical
research. Following Bruner (1991), when students use approach to ePortfolios focused on building a strong
portfolios to tell a story about their learning, they are personal brand within a framework of digital
not merely reflecting on their learning but actively storytelling. While the applicability of our pedagogical
creating a world in which they play the lead role. method to other settings has not yet been tested, our
Informed by narrative theorist Paul Ricoeur’s (1991) preliminary findings from an admittedly limited study
belief in the significance of expressing our lives indicate that the approach generates desirable learning
through stories, Nguyen (2013) saw students’ portfolios outcomes and promises to deliver additional benefits
as providing evidence that “life is a series of events that for students and faculty. The pedagogical approach
gain meaning when configured in narrative” (p. 139). In presented below is the result of a year’s worth of
the portfolios Nguyen (2013) analyzed, she identified instructional tinkering by the authors at Texas Christian
three themes: (a) that portfolios functioned as “a University (TCU). In the fall of 2013, TCU began an
sharable narrative of identity, in conjunction with ePortfolio pilot program, and one of the authors
others” (p. 139); (b) that the construction of portfolios involved in the pilot adopted an ePortfolio assignment
resulted in “new understandings of the self” (p. 139); in lieu of a final exam in her upper-level honors
and (c) that telling the story of their past enabled colloquium called the Disruptive Nature of Information
students to better imagine their future. Digital Technology. While the honors students successfully
Storytelling ePortfolios are further grounded in the completed the semester-long reflective ePortfolios,
work of Ramirez (2011), Klein (2013), and Kahn which emphasized integrative learning, their level of
(2014). Ramirez’s (2011) research looked at ePortfolio enthusiasm for the project was mixed, with some of the
crafting as an ePerformance, presenting a portfolio students understanding the value of the exercise and
persona, while Klein (2013) proposed the social others just completing the work half-heartedly for the
ePortfolio as a new concept of professional grade. The overall perception of the ePortfolio as
presentation. Finally, Kahn (2014) advocated for multi- documented in anonymous student evaluations was that
modal ePortfolios to develop 21st century skills. In our it was an unnecessary add-on to the course. Informal
view, approaching ePortfolios as a digital story is one conversations with students led the instructor to revise
way of connecting the instructor’s goal of using the assignment for a subsequent honors colloquium
ePortfolios to deepen learning and students’ interest in taught in the spring of 2014, Digital Identity and Digital
creating a compelling representation of self and brand Storytelling Across Disciplines. The spring 2014
for a potential audience outside the class. colloquium focused on students’ building of a personal
Our Digital Storytelling ePortfolio approach is also brand, using project-based learning pedagogy, with
consistent with prior literature that identified strategies each week’s activities concentrating on the
for increasing students’ engagement in ePortfolio development of students’ better understanding of their
production. These strategies include (a) giving students identities, digital identities, personal brands, and
a sense of ownership over their ePortfolios (Clark & potential for digital storytelling, Rather than asking the
Eynon, 2009; Klein, 2013; Ring, Weaver, & Jones, students to construct a learning portfolio for an internal
2008; Yancey, 2009), as both the freedom to select audience, the instructor asked students to develop a
what is included and choice in the visual components of showcase portfolio for an external audience, as
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 71

Figure 1
Digital Storytelling ePortfolio for Personal Brand Development Pedagogy

Phase 1 – Establishing Brand Identity

Inquiry Mentoring Reflection Integration

Phase 2 – Positioning the Brand

Narrative Artifacts Media ePortfolio Construction

Phase 3 – Evaluating Brand’s Image

Social Media Integration ePortfolio Evaluation & Feedback ePortfolio Presentation

COLLABORATION

appropriate for each student, either a graduate school students need guidance in the self-exploration process as
counselor or a potential employer, depending on their well as in the process of composing their digital stories
future plans. Many aspects of the ePortfolio assignment and brand communications. Figure 1 presents a
in both courses remained the same. For example, in framework for our spring 2014 Digital
both courses, students were presented with ePortfolio Storytelling/Personal Brand Development approach to
template pages from TCU’s pilot FrogFolio (Appendix ePortfolios that can help faculty understand the pedagogy
A) and were asked to respond to all the prompts of building a strong personal brand with an ePortfolio.
contained within it. In the second iteration of the Informed by the personal brand development
course, however, the instructor developed worksheets model of Khedher (2014), our framework identifies the
(Appendices B and C) intended to help students meet variety of tasks students complete in crafting their
the additional requirements of the specific course ePortfolios and the roles that faculty play in guiding
evaluation rubric (Appendix D). The weighing of the them. Importantly, our framework is meant to extend
grades for the ePortfolio project in the two courses also rather than replace previous comprehensive ePortfolio
differed. In the fall of 2013 the ePortfolio as a final models (e.g., Cambridge, Cambridge, & Yancey, 2009;
exam was worth approximately 25% of the student Eynon et al., 2014a; Peet et al., 2011; Penny Light,
grade, while in the spring of 2014 the portfolio counted Chen, & Ittelson, 2012; Reynolds & Patton, 2014;
as 40% of the grade. Zubizarreta, 2009). The pedagogy framework consists
In both courses, the students were high-achieving, of three phases, each one explained below.
traditional age, sophomore-through-senior level honors Phase 1: Establishing brand identity. The
students, representing various colleges and schools establishment of a student’s brand identity involves
across the university. Each class had sixteen students, inquiry, mentoring, reflection and integration in a
with approximately 30% male and 70% female collaborative environment.
students. The major difference between the two Inquiry. With the assistance of the course
courses was the pedagogical approach. In the spring of materials, peers and family, students begin a process of
2014, the instructor was intentional throughout the self-inquiry to determine what they value, what they are
entire course in helping students develop a personal good at, and what they aspire to, with a goal of crafting
brand within a digital storytelling ePortfolio. We a career vision and an accompanying set of needed
present the approach and its results below. professional goals and competencies. Faculty might ask
students to complete assignments involving personality
Pedagogy tests, such as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (Myers &
Myers, 1995), StrentgthsQuest (Anderson, 2004), or
To help students build strong personal brands Reflected Best Self exercise (Roberts, Dutton,
within the context of their ePortfolios, faculty must guide Spreitzer, Heaphy, & Quinn, 2005), or complete a
students to discover their current professional identities, personal SWOT analysis (Vallas & Cummins, 2015).
examine their digital identities, and craft compelling All our students completed StrengthsQuest and the
digital stories for their target audiences. Notably, Reflected Best Self exercise during spring 2014.
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 72

Mentoring. Faculty meet with each student to listen media. The faculty will eventually review whether the
and help everyone successfully develop a career vision artifacts and corresponding reflections appropriately
and a set of related professional competencies needed to relate to the desired competency development.
achieve their career vision. Students often need a Media selection. To make the portfolio visually
sounding board and an interpreter to help them sift appealing, students select appropriate media for each of
through the sea of data about themselves and make the portfolio pages. The faculty will eventually provide
meaning of it. The professor met with each student at feedback on the aesthetics of the ePortfolio pages.
least twice during the spring 2014 semester. One meeting Digital construction. Students construct the pages
was dedicated specifically to developing a career vision. using web design and new media writing guidelines,
Reflection. As students reflect on where they are in incorporating the narrative, the artifacts, and various
their career journey, what they have already done, and multimedia into their portfolio pages. Faculty can assist
what they need to accomplish in the near and distant students by providing helpful resources such as exemplar
future to move toward their goals, faculty assist them in portfolios, lists of helpful digital tools, and templates with
the critical thinking process, seeking career resources as guiding, general prompts for the assignment. Faculty will
needed. During the mentoring meetings, student eventually assess whether the pages constructed follow
reflection often required the instructor to find additional web design and new media writing guidelines while
campus resources for the student such as career capturing the planned narrative using appropriate artifacts
services, assessment tools, and alumni contacts. and media, and evoking the desired response.
Integration. Students integrate their understanding Phase 3: Evaluating the brand’s image.
of self, their values and accomplishments in order to Evaluating the brand’s image involves social media
develop elements of their personal brand that include integration, evaluation, and feedback by relevant,
mission, vision, brand statement, and tagline for their available ePortfolio stakeholders, and a formal
target audience (see Appendix B, Personal Brand presentation of the ePortfolio.
Worksheet, for helpful prompts). Faculty might wish to Social media integration. Students obtain
review drafts of the completed worksheet and provide feedback on their social media presence from peers
individualized feedback to each student. and incorporate their pertinent social media
Phase 2: Positioning the brand. Positioning the platforms into the portfolio narrative. A workshop
brand involves narrative development, artifact on how to use LinkedIn or a similar platform can
selection, media selection, and digital story construction help students who are not yet active in a
within the ePortfolio. This phase also benefits from a professional network build a professional presence.
collaborative approach with peers and/or formative Given that (a) “social media enables identity
feedback from faculty. expression, exploration, and experimentation”
Narrative development. Students begin to develop (Code, 2013, p. 37), (b) nearly two-thirds of adults
their personal narrative, beginning with their About Me use social media (Pew Internet Research, 2015), and
page, followed by goals and learning experiences, (c) 45% of employers use social media to research
incorporating personal brand elements into their story candidates (Grasz, 2009), with search streams of
(see Appendix C, the Story of Me worksheet, for attributes, it is key to connect ePortfolio to
helpful elements to include in the narrative). As Wee pertinent professional social media platforms in
and Brooks (2010) suggested, order to further ePortfolio impact.
Evaluation and feedback. Students obtain feedback
In the case of personal branding strategies, the on the portfolio from peers, faculty and external
actor is expected to present a self that is constantly stakeholders and revise, as needed. Faculty provide a
working on itself, to better itself and its own helpful portfolio evaluation rubric to assist students in
relationships with others, all the while self-evaluation of their work. Since “identity formation is
demonstrating its behaviors are reflections of an a complex, iterative, and continual process” (Koole &
authentically unique personality. (p. 56) Parchoma, 2013), it is critical to involve students in
interaction, dialogue, and reflection around their
The faculty might wish to review the narrative drafts ePortfolio work, so that they can engage in “a recursive
and personal brand worksheets for consistency in the construction and deconstruction of identity”
story students are telling about themselves. (Christensen, 2003, p. 24). A professional social media
Artifact selection. To support their narrative presence enables students to engage directly with
arguments, students present electronic artifacts of their recruiters and seek feedback on their portfolios.
work with appropriate reflections, showcasing their Presentation. Students present their portfolio to
development towards desired competencies and goals. faculty, peers, and target audience, offering a rationale for
The artifacts might include quotes, essays, photos, the ePortfolio they built, artifacts selected, and reflections
slideshows, videos, class projects, and other digital included, thus showing intentionality of effort.
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 73

Figure 2
Personal Digital Brand Technologies

Throughout the entire process, students collaborate portfolio according to the seven principles of digital
with various individuals, such as peers, faculty, or storytelling, and we subsequently revised in response to
family members, and potential target audience their feedback in order to make our exemplar ePortfolio
members, to complete a task or seek guidance, as more effective for the spring 2014 students.
constructing a digital brand requires an understanding Table 2 presents key digital brand content that
of how the information we present is perceived by could be integrated in a digital brand ePortfolio to
others. The pedagogical framework presented above help students tell an authentic and credible story. Such
requires faculty to understand the technologies used in content could include links to student profiles in
the creation of a personal brand, as presented in Figure professional directories, authored content (e.g.,
2. Figure 2 stipulates that faculty members guiding papers, presentations, websites, blogs, other
students on their personal branding journey need to portfolios, and media), communications (e.g., social
know the capabilities of the web platform used to create media posts, community participation), and
the student ePortfolio, as well as the role that social professional network content.
media and Web 2.0 digital storytelling tools can play in
the production of an effective digital brand. While Evaluation
faculty proficiency with all the tools is not required,
guiding students toward helpful technology resources is To assess the effectiveness of our digital
critical so that students can develop an appreciation for storytelling approach to ePortfolio development in this
how their choice of different platforms and digital tools pilot study, we used multiple forms of data. Our
can help them differentiate themselves and be effective analysis included a study of student perceptions of the
as storytellers. We have created a digital portfolio about ePortfolio platform and an assessment of their personal
creating digital storytelling ePortfolios, called brand ePortfolio artifacts developed in the course. To
Composing Digital Portfolios: Best Practices From examine student perceptions, we used a pre- and post-
Digital Storytelling (Leverenz, 2014), which introduces class survey (see Appendix E) developed at TCU by the
students to our unique approach, offers answers to ePortfolio pilot team and administered to all the
common student questions, showcases best practices, students participating in the 2013-2014 ePortfolio pilot.
and presents further resources. Students in the Fall 2013 To assess the student portfolios, we used a rubric (see
course were invited to evaluate our instructional Appendix D) developed by the faculty member
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 74

Table 2
Key Digital Brand Content
Key Digital Brand Content
Profiles Authored content Communications Networks
• Directory • Papers & Publications • Social Media Posts • Professional Affiliations
Information • Presentations • Community • Connections
• Search Results • Websites Participation • Endorsements
• Blogs
• Portfolios
• Digital Stories
• Media
• Bookmarks

teaching the course and based on the key learning To assess the quality of students’ learning as presented
outcomes of the project. Additionally, we solicited in their portfolios, we conducted a summative evaluation of
further validation for our work from external all students’ work with the same rubric we used for
stakeholders. We present below the results of our data formative assessment (Appendix D). The instructor
analysis and the feedback we received. reviewed all the students’ work twice: once during their
The students enrolled in the course completed a short presentation and again outside of the class environment, to
survey on the first and last day of the course. The survey make sure no details were missed. The faculty assessment
presented eight questions using a Likert scale response and yielded an average ePortfolio class score of 96.7%, with the
seven open-ended questions. After the semester was over, range of 91% to 100% across all 16 students. We are
we used paired t-tests of students’ responses before and after confident that the pedagogy, when implemented as
the course, to determine if student perceptions had changed. described, yields not only a high level of student
The data suggests that students’ agreement with the survey satisfaction, but also high quality ePortfolios capturing
statements had significantly improved (n = 16). At the end students’ identities, digital brands, and important learning.
of the course, 100% of students either agreed or strongly Additionally, many of the sixteen student portfolios
agreed with all eight prompts presented. We found developed in the spring 2014 course have also received
statistically significant differences in student perceptions external recognition. Numerous students received
regarding ePortfolio, learning and digital identity pre- and awards at the TCU ePortfolio Showcases over
post-course at the .01 level. Table 3 presents pre- and post- subsequent semesters. Most notably, the portfolio of
test mean survey responses in the spring 2014 class. Paige Weishaar (see Figure 3) won the “Best Portfolio”
Notably, students indicated in their post-tests that the course recognition of the spring 2014 TCU Showcase and is
had enhanced (a) appreciation of their ePortfolios; (b) their one of the four ePortfolios featured on the
ability to connect knowledge with learning experiences, Digication.com homepage. To-date, her portfolio has
passions, and goals; (c) their belief in ePortfolio’s received over 35,000 views. Having developed a stellar
contribution to understanding of self; and (d) their need to portfolio as well as an understanding of the pedagogies
maintain a digital identity. Following are a representative and technologies surrounding portfolio work, Paige
sample of students’ final comments about the Digital became a student intern in the TCU ePortfolio program,
Storytelling ePortfolio project from the open-ended helping other students develop their portfolios. Paige’s
questions at the end of the survey: learning reflection at a regional AAEEBL conference
included the following testimonial for the approach we
• “ePortfolio allowed me to make life present (Jones & Weishaar, 2016),
connections and form professional, clear-cut
definition of who I am as a person and as a By doing some initial reflection and soul-
professional.” searching, I was able to better understand what
• “The ePortfolio helped me realize how my makes me, me, as well as define my own
learning is not compartmentalized, but is ever- personal brand and tagline. This branding
flowing and crosses over into all areas of my life.” became crucial when composing my digital
• “The ePortfolio helped me form a mission and story, helping to direct every decision I made
vision statement in order to figure out my when creating my ePortfolio. In short, if it
career path and hopefully gain a competitive didn’t support my personal brand or my future
advantage in the job market.” goals or ambitions, I didn’t add it.
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 75

Table 3
Pre- and Post-Course Student Perceptions of ePortfolios and Digital Identity
Prompt Average Pre-Test Response Average Post-Test Response
I understand the purpose and potential uses of
ePortfolios to contribute to my growth as a
learner and the development of my professional 3.88 4.63
digital identity.
I can identity and provide specific examples of
the knowledge and skills I’ve gained from 3.56 4.63
different types of learning experiences.
I understand the importance of connecting the
knowledge I’ve gained from one place to other 4.19 4.94
situations.
I understand and can demonstrate how my
varied learning experiences are connected to
certain desired learning outcomes of the 3.53 4.75
university.
I can demonstrate the knowledge/skills I’ve
gained from pursuing an area of study, or
engaging in a series of actions, that reflect my 3.75 4.69
passions and interests.
I can identify significant, impactful learning
experiences both inside and outside the
classroom, and thoughtfully reflect upon how 4.00.00 4.75
those experiences have shaped/changed my
understanding of self, others, and/or the world.
I understand the need to develop a professional
digital identity that is distinct from a typical 4.19 4.81
Facebook, LinkedIn, or similar online identity.
I believe it is important to develop and maintain
a professional digital identity that demonstrates
4.38 4.84
my knowledge, skills, values, goals and
contributions to the human community.

The social media audit exercise was very pedagogy focused on personal branding was effective
helpful, too, as it allowed me to take a step back in achieving our goals of enhanced student learning and
and see, through another individual’s eyes, how I increased student engagement. The effectiveness of this
am already perceived online. If you didn’t like approach, we believe, resulted from shifting the focus
what you saw, you had the opportunity to refine the for students from creating a semester-end integrated
way you presented yourself, or you could use that learning portfolios to engaging in a semester-long
experience as a precursor towards telling your process of developing a showcase portfolio that
digital story. captures their personal brands. With this approach,
students did not perceive the task of ePortfolio
All of these parts and pieces led to the showcase construction as mundane but instead embraced it as an
displayed in Figure 3. important part of their life’s journey. In addition to
increasing student engagement, this focus on personal
Discussion branding and digital storytelling in the context of
ePortfolios has the added benefit of enabling students to
Based on these formal and informal assessments by develop key relevant twenty-first century skills.
students, faculty, and external stakeholders, we We live in an age of accelerating innovation and
determined that our Digital Storytelling ePortfolio disruption. From bionics, through cognitive computing,
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 76

Figure 3
Sample Digital Storytelling ePortfolio from Paige Weishaar

Note. Retrieved from https://tcu.digication.com/paige_weishaar/About_Me/published

to crowdsourcing, developments in information which yields innovation” (p. 314);

technology have changed how we work, live, and learn • Making: also known as design thinking,
(Brynjolfsson & McAfee, 2011). While AAC&U making “requires mastering the design
VALUE rubrics capture some of the essential learning process, including skills for devising
outcomes for undergraduate education (i.e., inquiry and prototypes” (p. 314);
analysis, critical thinking, written communication, • Learning: “the ability to learn new skills at will,
teamwork), tomorrow’s graduates need additional producing learners who know what and how to
higher-order skills or meta-skills to be successful learn just in time for a new problem” (p. 314).
performing jobs that have not yet been invented.
Neumeier (2013) offers educators a framework of five We believe ePortfolio projects that involve personal
metacognitive skills students need to develop, branding and digital storytelling goals can help fuel the
regardless of discipline, to produce value in our new development of Neumaier’s (2013) 21st century
economy. These have been summarized by Jones metacognitive skills:
(2016) and include,
• Feeling: The projects provide opportunity to
• Feeling: a “pre-requisite for the process of build empathy during audience
innovation, feeding empathy, intuition, and consideration as students develop their
social intelligence” (p. 314); narrative, select artifacts, and build the
• Seeing: “the ability to craft a holistic solution, ePortfolio. Students consider needs and
also known as systems thinking, which helps values of their audience and how the story
solve complex, non-linear problems of the they are creating addresses those needs.
Robotic Age” (p. 314); • Seeing: The projects provide an opportunity to
• Dreaming: “the skill of applied imagination, improve systems thinking during prototyping
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 77

Figure 4
Digital Storytelling ePortfolio for Personal Brand Development - Project Outcomes

Pedagogies
ePortfolio Mentoring Inquiry, Reflection, Integration
Pedagogies &
Outcomes

Outcomes
Institutional, Program, Self-Awareness, Deeper, Connected
Course Outcomes Self-Direction Learning

Technologies
ePortfolio Social Media Tools Digital Storytelling Tools ePortfolio Platform
Technologies &
Outcomes

Outcomes
Connections with Others Collaboration Technology Skills

Ability to Learn &

Key 21st Century Systems & Design
Empathy Creativity Learning
Skills Developed Thinking Skills
Ownership

of the portfolio. While developing the In composing a digital story, students choose
portfolio students must consider various from many possible ways of telling their
inputs, such as personal brand elements, story—via words, still images, video clips,
artifacts, media, and narrative and arrange graphics, sound, and narration. In so doing, they
them in a way that meets the web design enact creative agency.
requirements, while also targeting the appeal • Making: Students practice design thinking as they
for their selected audience: “Digitized artifacts refine their early ePortfolio prototypes, based on
may be assembled into the virtual environment feedback, until they are satisfied that the brand
much the same way that a theatrical setting communication they have created is compelling to
must be constructed, costumes built, or their audience. Digital storytelling offers unique
properties introduced” (Ramirez, 2011, p. 3). opportunities for social learning, as stories-in-
• Dreaming: The projects give students a chance process are shared, discussed, and revised and as
to develop creativity when designing their students compose in anticipation of sharing their
personal story, selecting the color scheme, stories with their target audience.
creating a portfolio banner, and selecting media • Learning: The projects enable students to learn
and artifacts, so that the ePortfolio will appear how to learn by requiring them to use technology
aesthetically pleasing to the target audience. tools not taught in class, such as various digital
When students engage seriously in selecting storytelling tools. Although for some students,
and arranging learning artifacts, they exhibit the being asked to use an unfamiliar technology can
kind of interpretive agency required of all initially be a barrier to learning, working in a new
effective storytelling, a necessarily creative act. medium heightens awareness of the learning
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 78

process. Furthermore, “storytelling makes assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long
composition strategies visible in new ways. for the endless immensity of the sea.”
Students have reported that they were more aware
of the compositional strategies involved in writing References
after they had worked with multimedia authoring
projects” (Oppermann, 2008, p. 179). Abrahamson, C. E. (1998). Storytelling as a
pedagogical tool in higher education. Education,
Thus, in addition to achieving well established 118(3), 440-451.
ePortfolio goals such as heightened self-awareness, and Alexander, B. (2011). The new digital storytelling:
deeper, connected learning, our approach, emphasizing Creating narratives with new media. Santa
personal branding using digital storytelling strategies Barbara, CA: Praeger.
has the added benefit of helping students build relevant Anderson, E. C. (2004). StrengthsQuest: Curriculum
21st century skills that are advocated by Neumeier outline and learning activities. Princeton, NJ:
(2013), as presented in Figure 4. Gallup Organization.
Digital Storytelling ePortfolios further support the Arruda, W., & Dixson, K. (2007). Career distinction:
argument of Huber et al. (2015) that e-Portfolios are yet Stand out by building your brand. Hoboken, NJ:
another high impact practice (Kuh, 2008). For further John Wiley & Sons.
discussion of the impact of digital storytelling ePortfolios on Barrett, H. (2005). Digital storytelling research
metacognitive development, please see Jones and Terry design. Retrieved from
(2015). For a more detailed description of how the authors http://electronicportfolios.com/digistory/Resear
have developed this approach to ePortfolios and other chDesign.pdf
helpful resources, please see Jones and Leverenz (2014). Barrett, H., & Carney, J. (2005). Conflicting paradigms
In future implementations, we plan to place more and competing purposes in electronic portfolio
emphasis on broadening students’ understanding of their development. Retrieved from
personal brand by incorporating existing student content http://electronicportfolios.org/portfolios/LEAJourn
from other social media platforms to strengthen their stories. al-BarrettCarney.pdf
We also plan to make more explicit pedagogically the Batson, T. (2007, December 12). The eportfolio
connection between ePortfolio construction and the hijacked. Campus Technology. Retrieved from
development of Neumeier’s (2013) meta-cognitive skills. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2007/12/the
Future studies will be needed to assess the effectiveness of -eportfolio-hijacked.aspx
our approach for helping student develop these meta-skills. Bass, R. (2012). Disrupting ourselves: The problem
We will also need to examine the pay-offs to students of of learning in higher education. EDUCAUSE
developing these skills in the context of crafting and Review, March/April, 23-33. Retrieved from
communicating their personal brands. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM122
1.pdf
Conclusion Bass, R. (2013). Engines of inquiry: Teaching,
technology, and learner-centered approaches to
As ePortfolio adoption at universities is growing and culture and history. Retrieved from
students are asked to create ePortfolios ever more often, http://ctl.baruch.cuny.edu/files/2013/09/Engines.pdf
we hope the pedagogical framework presented here can Bass, R. (2014). The next whole thing in higher
assist faculty who wish to maximize student motivation education. Peer Review, 16(1). Retrieved from
and satisfaction while also producing high quality artifacts http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2014/winter/re
and student learning. The framework facilitates digital ality-check
identity development and personal brand creation, Bass, R., & Oppermann, M. (2005). Comments at the
extending the work of previous ePortfolio scholars. visible knowledge project summer institute.
Heightening student self-exploration by including personal Washington, DC: Georgetown University.
branding within a context of ePortfolio development can Belshaw, D. (2012). What is “digital literacy”? (Doctoral
make portfolio work more compelling for students, as dissertation). Retrieved from http://dmlcentral.net/wp-
evidenced in our pilot study of second- through fourth- content/uploads/files/doug-belshaw-edd-thesis-
year students in an honors colloquium. Furthermore, a final.pdf
digital storytelling/personal branding approach to Benmayor, R. (2008). Digital storytelling as a signature
ePortfolios can facilitate students’ development of key 21st pedagogy for the new humanities. Arts and
century meta-skills (Neumeier, 2013), as well as their own Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 188-204.
human and social capital. We see our work as validation of doi:10.1177/1474022208088648
Antoine de Saint-Exupery quotation, “If you want to build Bernard, R. (2006). The educational uses of digital
a ship, don’t drum up people to collect wood and don’t storytelling. Retrieved from
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 79

http://digitalstorytelling.coe.uh.edu/articles/Educ- the connect to learning project. International

Uses-DS.pdf Journal of ePortfolio, 4(1), 96-114. Retrieved from
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. http://www.theijep.com/pdf/ijep127.pdf
Critical Inquiry, 18, 1-20. doi:10.1086/448619 Eynon, B., Gambino, L. M., & Török, J. (2014b).
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2011). Race against Completion, quality, and change: The difference
the machine: How the digital revolution is e-portfolios make. Peer Review, 16(1). Retrieved
accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and from http://www.aacu.org/publications-
irreversibly transforming employment and the research/periodicals/completion-quality-and-
economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press. change-difference-e-portfolios-make
Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, identity, and digital Fletcher, C., & Cambre, C. (2009). Digital storytelling
media. Cambridge, MA: MIT. and implicated scholarship in the classroom.
Cambridge, D. (Ed.). (2010). E-portfolios for life-long Journal of Canadian Studies, 43(1), 109-130.
learning and assessment. San Francisco, CA: doi:10.3138/jcs.43.1.109
Jossey-Bass. Gallagher, C., & Poklop, L. (2014). ePortfolios and
Cambridge, D., Cambridge, B., & Yancey, K. B. (Eds.). audience: Teaching a critical twenty-first
(2009). Electronic portfolios 2.0: Emergent century skills. International Journal of
research on implementation and impact. Sterling, ePortfolio, 4(1), 7-20. Retrieved from
VA: Stylus. http://www.theijep.com/pdf/ijep126.pdf
Christensen, N. B. (2003). Inuit in cyberspace: Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in
Embedding offline identities online. Copenhagen, everyday life. New York, NY: Penguin.
Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press. Grasz, J. (2009). Forty-five percent of employers use
Chritton, S. (2012). Personal branding for dummies. social networking sites to research job candidates,
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Careerbuilder survey finds. Retrieved from
Clark, J. E., & Eynon, B. (2009). ePortfolios at 2.0— http://www.careerbuilder.com/share/aboutus/pressr
Surveying the field. Peer Review, 11(1), 18-23. eleasesdetail.aspx?id=pr519&sd=8/19/2009&ed=1
Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/publications- 2/31/2009
research/periodicals/e-portfolios- Hernez-Broome, G., McLaughlin, C., & Trovas, S.
20%E2%80%94surveying-field (2009). Showcasing your talent with authenticity.
Code, J. (2013). Agency and identity in social media. In Leadership in Action, 29(4), 18-22.
S. Warburton & S. Hatzipanagos (Eds.), Digital doi:10.1002/lia.1300
identity and social media (pp. 37-57). Hershey, Hubert, D., Pickavance, J., & Hyberger, A. (2015).
PA: Information Science Reference. Reflective ePortfolio: One HIP to rule them all?
doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1915-9.ch004 Peer Review, 17(4). Retrieved from
Coventry, M. (2008). Engaging gender: Student application http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/2015/fall/hubert
of theory through digital storytelling. Arts and Jenkins, R. (2004). Social identity (key ideas) (2nd ed.).
Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 205-219. London, UK: Routledge.
Cradler, J., McNabb, M., Freeman, M., & Burchett, R. doi:10.4324/9780203463352
(2002). How does technology influence student Jenkins, M., & Lonsdale, J. (2007). Evaluating the
learning? Retrieved from http://www.dlc- effectiveness of digital storytelling for student
ubc.ca/wordpress_dlc_mu/technologyandcurriculu reflection. Proceedings of the 2007 ASCILITE
m/files/2011/10/Article.StudentLearning.pdf Conference, Singapore, 440-444. Retrieved from
Cunningham, C. (2013). Social networking and http://www.ascilite.org/conferences/singapore07/pr
impression management: Self-presentation in the ocs/jenkins.pdf
digital age. Lanham, MD: Lexington. Jones, B. (2016). Toward a science of honors education.
Dahlstrom, E., Brooks, C., & Bischel, J. (2014). ECAR Journal of the National Collegiate Honors Council,
study of undergraduate students and information 17(1), 307-333.
technology. Retrieved from Jones, B., & Leverenz, C. (2014, July). Weaving digital
https://library.educause.edu/resources/2014/10/201 identities: The effective implementation of
4-student-and-faculty-technology-research-studies ePortfolios with digital storytelling approach.
Deckers, E., & Lacy, K. (2011). Branding yourself: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
using social media to invent or reinvent yourself. Association of Authentic, Experiential, and
Indianapolis, IN: Que. Evidence-Based Learning, Boston, MA.
Du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. Jones, B., & Terry, D. (2015, July). The self-aware
London, UK: Sage. agent: How digital storytelling ePortfolios
Eynon, B., Gambino, L. M., & Török, J. (2014a). What cultivate meta-cognition. Paper presented at the
difference can eportfolio make? A field report from annual meeting of the Association of Authentic,
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 80

Experiential, and Evidence-Based Learning, from the crowd. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-
Boston, MA. Koehler.
Jones, B., & Weishaar, P. (2016, March). Building Montoya, P. (2002). The personal branding
coherent digital identity with a digital storytelling phenomenon: Realize greater influence, explosive
ePortfolio. Paper presented at the Western income growth, and rapid career advancement by
Regional AAEEBL Conference, Fort Worth, TX. applying the branding techniques of Oprah,
Kahn, S. (2014). E-portfolios: A look at where we’ve Martha and Michael. United States of America:
been, where we are now, and where we’re CreateSpace.
(possibly) going. Peer Review, 16(1). Retrieved Myers, I., & Myers, P. (1995). Gifts differing:
from https://www.aacu.org/publications- understanding personality type. Mountain View,
research/periodicals/e-portfolios-look-where-weve- CA: Davies-Black.
been-where-we-are-now-and-where-were Neumeier, M. (2013). Meta skills: The five skills for the
Kehoe, A., & Goudzwaard, M. (2015). ePortfolios, robotic age. San Francisco, CA: New Riders.
badges, and the whole digital self: How evidence- Nguyen, C. E. (2013). The ePortfolio as a living portal:
based learning pedagogies and technologies can A medium for student learning, identity, and
support integrative learning and identity assessment. International Journal of ePortfolio,
development. Theory Into Practice, 54(4), 343- 3(2), 135-148. Retrieved from
351. doi:10.1080/00405841.2015.1077628 http://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP116.pdf
Khedher, M. (2014). Personal branding phenomenon. Oppermann, M. (2008). Digital storytelling and
International Journal of Information, Business and American studies: Critical trajectories from the
Management, 6(2). Retrieved from emotional to the epistemological. Arts and
https://ijibm.elitehall.com/IJIBM_Vol6No2_May2 Humanities in Higher Education, 7(2), 171-87.
014.pdf doi:10.1177/1474022208088647
Klein, L. (2013). The social ePortfolio: Integrating Peet, M., Lonn, S., Gurin, P., Boyer, K. P., Matney, M.,
social media and models of learning in academic Marra, T., . . . Daley, A. (2011). Fostering
ePortfolios. In K. Wills & R. Rice (Eds.), integrative knowledge through ePortfolios.
ePortfolio performance support systems: International Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 11-31.
Constructing, presenting, and assessing portfolios Penny Light, T., Chen, H. L., & Ittelson, J. C. (2012).
(pp. 57-74). Retrieved from Documenting learning with ePortfolios: A guide for
http://wac.colostate.edu/books/eportfolios/ college instructors. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Koole, M., & Parchoma, G. (2013). The web of Pew Internet Research (2015). Social media usage:
identity: A model of digital identity formation in 2005-2015. Retrieved from
networked learning environments. In S. Warburton http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/social-
& S. Hatzipanagos (Eds.), Digital identity and networking-usage-2005-2015/
social media (pp. 14-28). Hershey, PA: Peters, T. (1997, August 31). The brand called you.
Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1- Fast Company. Retrieved from
4666-1915-9.ch002 http://www.fastcompany.com/28905/brand-
Kuh, G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: called-you
What they are, who has access to them, and why Porter, B. (2004). DigiTales: The art of digital stories.
they matter. Washington, DC: AAC&U. Sedalia, CO: Bernajean Porter Consulting.
Labrecque, L. I., Markos, E., & Milne, G. R. (2011). Ramirez, K. (2011). ePerformance: Crafting, rehearsing,
Online personal branding: Processes, challenges, and presenting the ePortfolio persona. International
and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, Journal of ePortfolio, 1(1), 1-9. Retrieved from
25(1), 37-50. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2010.09.002 http://www.theijep.com/pdf/IJEP21.pdf
Lambert, J. (2002). Digital storytelling: Capturing Ramist, R., Doerr-Stevens, C., & Jacobs, W. (2010). The
lives, creating community. Berkeley, CA: Digital pedagogy of digital storytelling in the college
Diner Press. classroom. International Journal of Media,
Leverenz, C. (2014). Composing digital portfolios: best Technology, and Lifelong Learning, 6(2). Retrieved
practices from digital storytelling. Retrieved from from http://www.seminar.net/index.php/home/75-
https://tcu.digication.com/composing_digital_portfol current-issue/145-the-pedagogy-of-digital-storytelling-
ios_best_practices_from_digital_storytelling/Home/ in-the-college-classroom
McDrury, J., & Alterio, M. (2003). Learning through Rampersad, H. K. (2008). A new blueprint for powerful
storytelling in higher education. London, UK: and authentic personal branding. Performance
Kogan Page. Improvement, 47(6), 34-37. doi:10.1002/pfi.20007
McNally, D., & Speak, K. D. (2002). Be your own Reynolds, C., & Patton, J. (2014). Leveraging
brand: A breakthrough formula for standing out ePortfolio for integrative learning: A faculty guide
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 81

to classroom practices for transforming student 101-104. doi:10.19030/jss.v6i1.8240

learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus. Wee, L., & Brooks, A. (2010). Personal branding and
Rhodes, T., Chen, H. L., Watson, C. E., & Garrison, W. the commodification of reflexivity. Cultural
(2014). Editorial: A call for more rigorous Sociology, 4(1), 45-62.
ePortfolio research. International Journal of doi:10.1177/1749975509356754
ePortfolio, 4(1), 1-5. Retrieved from Wetsch, L. R. (2012). A personal branding assignment
http://www.theijep.com/pdf/ijep144.pdf using social media. Journal of Advertising
Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life: A story in search of a narrator. Education, 16(1), 30-36.
In M. Valdes (Ed.), A Ricoeur reader: Reflection Williams, S., Fleming, S., Lundqvist, K., & Parslow, P.
and imagination. Toronto, Canada: University of (2013). This is me: Digital identity and reputation
Toronto Press. on the internet. In S. Warburton & S. Hatzipanagos
Ring, G., Weaver, B., & Jones, J. (2008). Electronic (Eds.), Digital identity and social media (pp. 104-
portfolios: Engaged students create multimedia- 117). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
rich artifacts. Journal of the Research Center doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1915-9.ch008
for Educational Technology, 4(2), 103-114. Yancey, K. B. (2009). Electronic portfolios a decade
Retrieved from into the twenty-first century: What we know, what
http://www.rcetj.org/index.php/rcetj/article/vie we need to know. Peer Review, 11(1), 28-32.
w/29/35 Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/publications-
Roberts, L., Dutton, J., Spreitzer, G., Heaphy, E., & research/periodicals/electronic-portfolios-decade-
Quinn, R. (2005). Composing the reflected best- twenty-first-century-what-we-know
self portrait: Building pathways for becoming Yancey, K. B. (2013). Postmodernism, palimpsest, and
extraordinary in work organizations. Academy of portfolios: Theoretical issues in the representation
Management Review, 30(4), 712-736. of student work. In. K. Wills & R. Rice (Eds.),
doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.18378874 ePortfolio performance support systems:
Robin, B. (2006). The educational uses of digital Constructing, presenting, and assessing portfolios
storytelling. Retrieved from (pp. 19-39). Fort Collins, Colorado: WAC
http://digitalliteracyintheclassroom.pbworks.com/f/ Clearinghouse and Parlor Press. Retrieved from
Educ-Uses-DS.pdf http://wac.colostate.edu/books/eportfolios/
Robin, B. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful Yang, Y. C., & Wu, W. I. (2012). Digital storytelling
technology tool for the 21st century classroom. for enhancing student academic achievement,
Theory into Practice, 47(3), 220-228. critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-
doi:10.1080/00405840802153916 long experimental study. Computers and
Schawbel, D. (2009). Me 2.0: Build a powerful brand Education, 59(2), 339-52.
to achieve career success. New York, NY: Kaplan. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.012
Schank, R. (1990). Tell me a story: Narrative and Zubizarreta, J. (2009). The learning portfolio:
intelligence. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Reflective practice for improving student learning.
University Press. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Solove, J. (2008). The future of reputation: Gossip, ____________________________
rumor, and privacy on the internet. New Haven,
CT: Yale University Press. BEATA JONES, PhD, is Professor of Business
Vallas, S. P., & Cummins, E. R. (2015). Personal Information Systems Practice at the Neeley School of
branding and identity norms in the popular Business and Honors Faculty Fellow at the John V.
business press: Enterprise culture in an age of Roach Honors College, Texas Christian University.
precarity. Organization Studies, 36(3), 293-319.
doi:10.1177/0170840614563741 CARRIE LEVERENZ, PhD, is Professor of English
Ward, C., & Yates, D. (2013). Personal branding and e- and Director of the Institute for Critical and Creative
professionalism. Journal of Service Science, 6(1), Expression at Texas Christian University.
Jones and Leverenz Digital Storytelling ePortfolios 82

Appendix A
TCU FrogFolio Template and Prompts

Personal Learning Goals

Desired College Outcomes
College is a time of tremendous change and transition. In fact, the sheer number of changes and
adjustments can be a bit disorienting. For this reason, setting goals can be a helpful way of
establishing one’s direction and purpose. With this in mind, reflect on the following questions:

• What do you hope to gain from college, other than a degree?

• What kind of growth or development or skills acquisition do you want from this
experience?
• What kind of work do you hope to do someday, and how will you get there?
• What kind of person do you hope to be in the world?

Be sure that the goals you establish are SMART: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and
Time-bound.
 83

Progress toward Outcomes

How would you assess your work toward the goals you named in the previous page of this
section? What kinds of experiences are you having in college that are moving you toward your
goals? What experiences and opportunities are still out there that you’d like to pursue? What
challenges or obstacles have presented themselves and how are you dealing with those challenges?
My Learning Experiences

This section of FrogFolio contains learning artifacts that represent a student’s varied learning
experiences at TCU. Through reflecting upon and documenting these artifacts, a student represents
what they know and can do, and how growth in knowledge and the capacity to act has changed
them.This section contains two major sub-sections: 1.) Courses, and 2.) Co-curricular experiences.
Both sections contain evidence of signficant learning.
Courses
This page in My Learning Experiences is where students reflect upon, archive, and display
“artifacts” that represent significant learning experiences in college. An artifact can be almost
anything that represents a learning experience—papers, blogs, photos, audio or video files,
presentations, projects, work samples, etc. Students should use the artifact to tell the story of a
learning experience. Rather than simply uploading a file to the page, students should describe the
artifact or experience—what it is, why it was an important learning experience, and how the
information or experience affected their way of seeing themselves or the world. Students should
create a page for each course, and then place relevant artifacts from that course on the page.
Co-Curricular
Within the Co-Curricular Experiences page students have the opportunity to reflect on significant
learning experiences that occur outside the formal classroom. Students are encouraged to create
tabs/pages for organizations, clubs, honor societies, leadership programs, internships, etc. that
have shaped their college experience. For each experience, students should use artifacts, stories,
and examples to describe and reflect upon the impact of that experience in terms of personal
learning and growth.
TCU Learning Goals
In this section of FrogFolio, students articulate and reflect upon the connections between their
learning experiences and different parts of the TCU Mission Statement. Connecting learning
experiences to the university’s mission helps students become integrative thinkers and understand
how the varied learning experiences of college come together to shape thought and action.
Knowledge & Ability to Act as a Learner Informed by the Liberal Arts
The learning artifacts and experiences that I have placed on this page demonstrate how my thinking and
action has been shaped by my liberal arts education.

The following statements can serve as prompts to help you consider what it means to be a liberal arts
learner:
• thinking critically using tools from literature, the humanities, social and natural sciences, fine arts,
and mathematics;
• engaging thoughtfully and drawing reasoned conclusions about complex information and
situations;
• demonstrating an ability and willingness to learn in response to the challenges posed by a diverse
and evolving society;
• influencing others through written, spoken, or artistic expression;
• using appropriate methods of inquiry to analyze important natural, social, and human phenomena;
• applying theoretical and practical knowledge to novel situations.

Knowledge & Ability to Act as an Ethical Leader

The learning artifacts and experiences represented on this page demonstrate how I understand, articulate,
and enact ethical leadership.
 84

The following statements serve as prompts to help students think about what ethical leadership means and
the kinds of experiences they might draw upon to talk about insights and growth in this area:
o being aware of the personal and interpersonal complexities of change, and demonstrating the
ability to initiate, evaluate, and manage change;
o ability to consider the perspectives, needs, and expertise of others and work with them to solve
problems;
o ability to articulate a coherent leadership style and philosophy;
o employing core knowledge from a discipline of choice to develop and demonstrate an enhanced
capacity for effective leadership.

Knowledge & Ability to Act as a Responsible Citizen

The learning artifacts and experiences on this page demonstrate my understanding of what it means to be a
responsible citizen.

The following statements serve as prompts to help students think about what responsible citizenship means
and the kinds of experiences they might draw upon to talk about insights and growth in this area:
• demonstrating informed participation in civic discourse and decision-making at local and global
levels;
• recognizing unfair, unjust, or uncivil behaviors and acting to challenge those behaviors
appropriately;
• participating in and reflecting upon upon service or volunteer activities;
• understanding the economic, political, and ecological implications of private decisions and public
policies;
• understanding and enacting practices that foster personal and public health;
• managing time effectively in order to accomplish goals;
• participating in organizational or civic systems of governance

Knowledge & Ability to Act as a Committed Participant in the Global Community

The learning artifacts and experiences on this page demonstrate my understanding of and commitment to
being a global citizen in the 21st century.

The following statements serve as prompts to help students think about what committed participation in the
global community means and the kinds of experiences they might draw upon to talk about insights and
growth in this area:

• Appreciating the interconnectedness of society, culture, and individual identity;

• Knowing and understanding the impact of world religions, worldviews, and cultural frameworks;
• Engaging with other perspectives and cultures with reason and respect;
• Demonstrating the ability to generate informed opinions on global issues and thoughtfully
articulate those opinions;
• Participating in diverse cultural activities;
• Articulating the advantages and challenges of a cosmopolitan society.
Resume

Attribution
 85

Appendix B
Personal Brand Profile Worksheet

PERSONAL BRAND PROFILE WORKSHEET*

Your Top 5 Needs

Your Top 10 Values

Your Top 10 Interests & Passions

Personal Mission Statement

Personal Vision Statement

Your Strengths from StrengthsQuest

Your Top 10 Personality Traits

Your Reflected Best-Self Traits

Your Top 10 Accomplishments

3 SMART PROFESSIONAL Goals

Competencies Needed to Achieve Your

Goals (See e.g., Naseweb.org )
Activities Needed to Complete to Develop
the Competencies
Target Audience Statement

4 Potential Employers/Grad Schools with

URLS to websites
Company/Grad School Fit (Assess Yours
vs. Company’s values, etc. )
Target Audience Differentiation Statement

Unique Promise of Value Statement

Personal Brand Statement

Personal Brand Tagline

*To accompany Chritton (2012), Roberts et al. (2005), Anderson (2004), and Solove (2008).
 86

Appendix C
STORY OF ME Worksheet for ePortfolio

ePortfolio Audience: Your Target Audience from Personal Brand Worksheet – Employers/Grad School Counselors
BANNER IMAGE (With Optional Quote/Tagline/Equation, etc.) – What Does It Portray About You?
ABOUT ME
Your HOOK: Highlights that Media to Illustrate Your
Make YOU Interesting & Tells Interesting Facts (Graphics,
Your Story (e.g., Passions, Pictures, Video)
Purpose & Play; Main Picture-
Mission/Vision/Tagline): What Does it Portray About You?
Is it related to the HOOK?

Social Media Links/Feeds

Quote (Optional)

GOALS
Your SMART Competencies Needed PLANNED/COMPLETED Media to Illustrate the
Goal(s) in Life to Accomplish the Learning Experiences to Competency (e.g., Graphics,
Goal(s) Develop the Competency Pictures, Infographics, Word
Clouds, Maps, Timelines,
Video)

PROGRESS TOWARDS GOALS

Competencies Learning Experiences Artifacts Demonstrating Media to Illustrate the
Needed to that DEVELOPED the Competency (e.g., PPT, Developed Competency (e.g.,
Accomplish the Competency (Courses/ Paper, Spreadsheet, Video, Graphics, Pictures,
Goal(s) Life Experiences) Audio, Reflection) Infographics, Word Clouds,
Maps, Timelines, Video)

LEARNING EXPERIENCES
Courses
Course Reflection on Artifact to Illustrate Learning (e.g., Competency/Habit of Mind for
Name/Semester, Learning* PPT, Reflection, Spreadsheet, Which Learning is Relevant
Professor Video, Audio)
 87

Co-Curricular/Life Experiences
Activity Reflection Artifact to Illustrate Learning (e.g., Competency/Habit of Mind for
name/Semester on PPT, Reflection, Spreadsheet, Which Learning is Relevant
Learning* Video, Audio)

*Reflection on Learning – sample prompts:

(1) How did this course/experience prepare you for your professional career?
(2) How did this experience allow you to grow as a person, strengthening your skill set or knowledge?
(3) What did you learn about yourself through this experience?
RESUME
Student resume should be (1) viewable within Digication, (2) available for download via a .pdf link, and (3)
optionally, available visually through a link to an infographic resume (see below).
OTHE
Other Consideration Where Implemented? How?
Integration Across Learning Experiences
in Competency Discussion(s)
Evoking Emotion
SAMPLING OF HELPFUL TOOLS:
• Web Color Code Specifier: http://html-color-codes.com/
• Banner Creators: http://www.fotor.com/features/text.html , http://picfont.com/
• Picture Collage Creator: http://www.ribbet.com/app/?create_collage#/collage/grid
• Infographic Resume- http://kinzaa.com/ , http://re.vu/
• Infographic Charts: http://infogr.am/ , http://piktochart.com/ , http://www.easel.ly/
• Word Clouds: http://Wordle.net , http://www.jasondavies.com/wordcloud
• Timelines: http://www.timetoast.com/ , http://www.dipity.com/ , http://www.tiki-toki.com/
• Map Creator: http://www.zeemaps.com/
 88

Appendix D
ePortfolio Assessment Rubric

NAME:___________________________________________________________________________________

ELEMENT STANDARD POINTS

(300 TOTAL)
WEB DESIGN PRINCIPLES (75 pts)
Information • Easy to read with visual organization using readable fonts, bullets, italics, and bold.
Presentation • Uses headings and subheadings to organize the message.
(satisfies all • External and internal hyperlinks used where referring to organizations, companies, programs, etc.
standards) • Top banner created with an appropriate image and quote/tagline/equation to tell your story _____out of 65
• Multimedia - photos, graphics, sound, video enhance the message, create interest, aligned next to the text and appropriate for
the target audience, on every page.
• Incorporates multimedia elements created especially for the portfolio, e.g., a map, timeline, infographic.
Organization • Menus make sense and easily organize your “story.”
(satisfies all • All external links open properly and integrated within the narrative for ease of use. _____out of 10
standards) • Each Habit of Mind page clearly identifies which bullet(s) are going to be discussed.
CONTENT (225 pts)
Writing Mechanics • Text has no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
(satisfies all • Text is concise and easy to read. Message is clear by scanning the screen. _____out of 10
standards)
Resume (satisfies all • Resume is in an appropriate format for your discipline (see career services).
standards) • Included also a .pdf version and a link to a visual resume (optional +3pts). _____out of 10
Home/About me • Has a brief story about you, what’s important to you, what you’re studying, what you’re involved in, as appropriate to your
(satisfies all audience.
standards) • Has a mission/vision/tagline incorporated into your story from the Personal Brand Worksheet.
• Includes a meaningful photo that tells the story of who you are.
• Has links to social media sites where you are present professionally (e.g., LinkedIn, slideshare/prezi, blog, etc.). _____out of 25
• Has a Reflected Best-Self/This I Believe Essay (optional+3 pts).
Goals/Progress • Includes a statement of what you want to accomplish in life/what kind of person you want to be—envision a future self.
(satisfies all • Describes your professional goals & desired competencies. _____out of 20
standards) • States what steps you have taken to accomplish development of select competencies/goals.
• Discussion includes links to learning experiences/artifacts.
Learning Experiences • Includes reflection on at least 4 courses and 4 co-curricular experiences.
(satisfies all • All learning experiences are linked to goals/progress or habits of mind pages. _____out of 60
standards) • Artifacts and work samples are clearly related to the message conveyed (No syllabi, or course handouts- 3pts).
 89

Integrative & • Makes insightful connections across courses and experiences.

Reflective Learning • Reflects upon impactful learning experiences from class, co-curricular activities and life and how those experiences have
(satisfies all shaped understanding of self, others, and/or the world in relation to achievement of goals. _____out of 40
standards) • Demonstrates how learning experiences are connected to desired learning outcomes.
• Draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, theories or methodologies from more than one field.
MUST COMPLETE AT LEAST 3 OF THE 4 HABITS OF MIND (60 PTS)
Learner Informed by • Thinking critically using tools from literature, the humanities, social & natural sciences, fine arts, & mathematics.
the Liberal Arts • Engaging thoughtfully and drawing reasoned conclusions about complex information and situations.
grounded in evidence • Demonstrating an ability and willingness to learn in response to the challenges posed by a diverse and evolving society.
(satisfies at least one • Influencing others through written, spoken, or artistic expression. _____out of 20
standard; no more • Using appropriate methods of inquiry to analyze important natural, social, and human phenomena.
than 3) • Applying theoretical and practical knowledge to novel situations.
Ethical Leader • Shows awareness of the personal and interpersonal complexities of change, and demonstrating the ability to initiate, evaluate,
grounded in evidence and manage change.
(satisfies at least one • Considers the perspectives, needs, and expertise of others and work with them to solve problems.
standard; no more • Articulates a coherent leadership style and philosophy.
than 3) • Employing core knowledge from a discipline of choice to develop and demonstrate an enhanced capacity for effective _____out of 20
leadership.
Responsible Citizen • Demonstrates informed participation in civic discourse and decision-making at local and global levels.
grounded in evidence • Recognizes unfair, unjust, or uncivil behaviors and acting to challenge those behaviors appropriately.
(satisfies at least one • Participates in and reflects upon service or volunteer activities.
standard; no more • Understands the economic, political, and ecological implications of private decisions and public policies.
than 3) • Understands and enacts practices that foster personal and public health.
• Manages time effectively in order to accomplish goals. _____out of 20
• Participates in organizational or civic systems of governance
Participant in the • Appreciates the interconnectedness of society, culture, and individual identity.
Global Community • Understands and articulates the impact of world religions, worldviews, and cultural frameworks.
grounded in evidence • Engages with other perspectives and cultures with reason and respect.
(satisfies at least one • Demonstrates the ability to generate informed opinions on global issues & thoughtfully articulates opinions. _____out of 20
standard; no more • Participates in diverse cultural activities.
than 3) • Articulates the advantages and challenges of a cosmopolitan society.
 90

Appendix E
TCU ePortfolio Pilot Pre/Post Test

1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral/undecided, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree

I understand the purpose(s) and potential uses of ePortfolios to contribute to my growth as a learner and the
development of my professional digital identity.
1 2 3 4 5

I can identify and provide specific examples of the knowledge and skills I’ve gained from different types of learning
experiences.
1 2 3 4 5

I understand the importance of connecting the knowledge I’ve gained from one place (e.g., the skills gained working
with others on a service project), to other situations (e.g., working with a team to plan and produce a group
presentation in class).
1 2 3 4 5

I understand and can demonstrate how my varied learning experiences are connected to certain desired learning
outcomes of the university (e.g., demonstrations of ethical leadership, responsible citizenship, and ethical
participation in the global community).
1 2 3 4 5

I can demonstrate (through an essay, paper, presentation, video, ePortfolio page, etc.) the knowledge/skills I’ve
gained from pursuing an area of study, or engaging in a series of actions, that reflect my passions and interests.
1 2 3 4 5

I can identify significant, impactful learning experiences both inside and outside the classroom, and thoughtfully
reflect upon how those experiences have shaped/changed my understanding of self, others, and/or the world.
1 2 3 4 5

I understand the need to develop a professional digital identity that is distinct from a typical Facebook, LinkedIn, or
other similar online identity.
1 2 3 4 5

I believe it is important to develop and maintain a professional digital identity that demonstrates my knowledge,
skills, values, goals and contributions to the human community.
1 2 3 4 5
 91

Short Answers:

How can ePortfolios help you to think differently about the connections between all your varied learning
experiences (for example, course work, co-curricular programs and activities, internships, etc.)? Please explain
briefly.

In what ways are you most interested in what an ePortfolio can do for you as a student and future professional?
Please explain briefly.

What is the most challenging or confusing aspect of using ePortfolios? Please explain briefly.

Please list reasons why a student would want to take advantage of ePortfolios:

Please list reasons why a student would not want to use ePortfolios:

Have you ever used an ePortfolio before? If so, in what way?

What other questions, concerns, or comments do you have about using ePortfolios at TCU?

Demographic Information:

Gender: Male/Female Age: ______ Your major: _________________________

Race/Ethnicity: ____________________ Classification: first-year, second-year, third-year, fourth-year

View publication stats