NAGUIAT V. NLRC                                                         be held jointly and severally liable for the obligations of CFTI. And similarly, Sergio F.
G.R. No. 116123                                                        Naguiat and Antolin Naguiat were merely officers and stockholders of CFTI and, thus,
                                        March 13, 1997                                                         could not be held personally accountable for corporate debts.
Topic: Part 1
Petitioners: SERGIO F. NAGUIAT, doing business under the name and style SERGIO F.                    ISSUE: W/N Sergio Naguiat is solidarily liable.
NAGUIAT ENT., INC., & CLARK FIELD TAXI, INC.
Respondents: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (THIRD DIVISION), NATIONAL                          HELD: YES
ORGANIZATION OF WORKINGMEN and its members, LEONARDO T. GALANG, Et Al.
Ponente: PANGANIBAN, J                                                                               Sergio F. Naguiat, in his capacity as president of CFTI, cannot be exonerated from joint and
                                                                                                     several liability in the payment of separation pay to individual respondents. The Labor Code
DOCTRINE: Essentially, "tort" consists in the violation of a right given or the omission of a duty
                                                                                                     provides that an ‘Employer’ includes any person acting in the interest of an employer, directly
imposed by law. Simply stated, tort is a breach of a legal duty.
                                                                                                     or indirectly. The term shall not include any labor organization or any of its officers or agents
                                                                                                     except when acting as employer. As a corporation is an artificial person, it must have an officer
FACTS:
                                                                                                     who can be presumed to be the employer, being the ‘person acting in the interest of the
    ●     Petitioner CFTI held a concessionaire’s contract with the Army Air Force Exchange
                                                                                                     ‘employer corporation’. The corporation, only in the technical sense, is the employer. The
          Services ("AAFES") for the operation of taxi services within Clark Air Base. Sergio F.
                                                                                                     responsible officer of an employer corporation can be held personally liable.
          Naguiat was CFTI’s president, while Antolin T. Naguiat was its vice-president. Like
          Sergio F. Naguiat Enterprises, Incorporated ("Naguiat Enterprises" or “NE”), a trading
                                                                                                     Sergio F. Naguiat, admittedly, was the president of CFTI who actively managed the business.
          firm, it was a family-owned corporation. Respondents were previously employed by
                                                                                                     Thus, he falls under the definition of the word ‘employer’. Petitioners conceded that CFTI and
          CFTI as taxicab drivers.
                                                                                                     NE were close family corporations. According to the Corp Code, stockholders of close family
     ●    Due to the phase-out of the US military bases in the Philippines, the AAFES was
                                                                                                     corporations shall be personally liable for corporate torts. Essentially, "tort" consists in the
          dissolved, and the services of individual respondents were officially terminated.
                                                                                                     violation of a right given or the omission of a duty imposed by law. Simply stated, tort is a
          Thus, the AAFES Taxi Drivers Association ("drivers’ union") and CFTI held
                                                                                                     breach of a legal duty. The Labor Code mandates the employer to grant separation pay to
          negotiations as regards separation benefits that should be awarded in favor of the
                                                                                                     employees in case of closure or cessation of operations of establishment or undertaking not
          drivers. The parties agreed that the separated drivers will be given severance pay.
                                                                                                     due to serious business losses or financial reverses, which is the condition obtaining at bar.
          Most of the drivers accepted said amount, but the respondents herein refused to
                                                                                                     CFTI failed to comply with this law-imposed duty or obligation. Consequently, its stockholder
          accept theirs.
                                                                                                     who was actively engaged in the management or operation of the business should be held
     ●    The respondents, after disaffiliating themselves from the driver’s union and joining
                                                                                                     personally liable. In the present case, Sergio Naguiat is held solidarily liable for corporate tort
          a new labor organization (National Organization of Workingmen or “NOWM”), filed
                                                                                                     because he had actively engaged in the management and operation of CFTI, a close
          a complaint against the petitioners for payment of separation pay due to
                                                                                                     corporation.
          termination/phase-out. The respondents alleged that they were regular employees
          of Naguiat Enterprises, although their individual applications for employment were
                                                                                                     WHEREFORE, the foregoing premises considered, the petition is PARTLY GRANTED. The
          approved by CFTI. They claimed to have been assigned to Naguiat Enterprises after
                                                                                                     assailed February 28, 1994 Resolution of the NLRC is hereby MODIFIED as follows:
          having been hired by CFTI, and that the former managed, controlled, and supervised
          their employment; that they were entitled to separation pay. On the other hand,
                                                                                                     (1)       Petitioner Clark Field Taxi, Incorporated, and Sergio F. Naguiat, president and co-
          petitioners claimed that the cessation of business of CFTI was due to "great financial
                                                                                                     owner thereof, are ORDERED to pay, jointly and severally, the individual respondents their
          losses and lost business opportunity" resulting from the phase-out of Clark Air Base
                                                                                                     separation pay computed at US$120.00 for every year of service, or its peso equivalent at the
          brought about by the Mt. Pinatubo eruption and the expiration of the RP-US military
                                                                                                     time of payment or satisfaction of the judgment;
          bases agreement.
     ●    The labor arbiter, finding the individual complainants to be regular workers of CFTI,
                                                                                                     XXX
          ordered the latter to pay them P1,200.00 for every year of service "for humanitarian
          consideration”(they weren’t granted separation pay, to do so would be unjust to the
          employer whose business was brought down by force majeure). Thus, respondents
          appealed to the NLRC. In its Resolution, the NLRC modified the decision of the labor
          arbiter by granting separation pay to the private respondents. In discharging the
          above obligations, Sergio F. Naguiat Enterprises should be joined as indispensable
          party whose liability is joint and several.
     ●    Petitioners submitted additional issues by way of supplement, the pertinent issue
          being Naguiat Enterprises, Inc. is a separate and distinct juridical entity which cannot