See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/227446117
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical
Models
Article in Management Science · August 1989
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Source: RePEc
CITATIONS READS
12,302 29,327
3 authors, including:
Fred D. Davis Richard Bagozzi
University of Arkansas University of Michigan
85 PUBLICATIONS 73,022 CITATIONS 340 PUBLICATIONS 75,736 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Reshoring from a demand-side perspective View project
household food waste minimization View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Richard Bagozzi on 01 September 2016.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
User Acceptance Of Computer Technology: A Comparison Of Two
Davis, Fred D.; Bagozzi, Richard P.; Warshaw, Paul R.
Management Science; Aug 1989; 35, 8; ABI/INFORM Global
pg. 982
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
View publication stats
