US vs KIENE
FACTS: Kiene was an insurance agent of China Mutual Life Insurance Company. He was convicted of the crime of estafa for his failure and
refusal to turn over to the insurance company the amount he has collected on account of the company. Kiene contended that he should not
be charged of estafa since there was no obligation on his part to deliver to the insurance company the amount collected.
ISSUE:Is Kiene liable to deliver the amount collected to the insurance company?
HELD: Yes. According to Art. 1891, “Every agent is bound to render an account of his transactions and to deliver to the principal whatever
he may have received by virtue of the agency, even though it may not be owing to the principal. Every stipulation exempting the agent from
the obligation to render an account shall be void.” Hence, Kiene is bound to deliver the sum of money.