0% found this document useful (0 votes)
278 views5 pages

18.A34 PROBLEMS #7: 1 2 K I I I

This document contains a collection of mathematical problems and questions. Problem 77 asks about the minimum number of weights needed to weigh any number of pounds from 1 to 63 pounds on a scale, and to generalize to any number of pounds. Problem 78 relates the number of perfect partitions of a number n to the number of ordered factorizations of n+1 into parts greater than one. Problem 79 contains a flawed proof that all people have the same height.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
278 views5 pages

18.A34 PROBLEMS #7: 1 2 K I I I

This document contains a collection of mathematical problems and questions. Problem 77 asks about the minimum number of weights needed to weigh any number of pounds from 1 to 63 pounds on a scale, and to generalize to any number of pounds. Problem 78 relates the number of perfect partitions of a number n to the number of ordered factorizations of n+1 into parts greater than one. Problem 79 contains a flawed proof that all people have the same height.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

18.

A34 PROBLEMS #7
77. [1] (a) What is the least number of weights necessary to weigh any
integral number of pounds from 1 lb. to 63 lb. inclusive, if the
weights must be placed on only one of the scale-pans of a balance?
Generalize to any number of pounds.
(b) Same as (a), but from 1 lb. to 40 lb. if the weights can be placed
in either of the scale-pans. Generalize.
(c) A gold chain contains 23 links. What is the least number of links
which need to be cut so a jeweler can sell any number of links
from 1 to 23, inclusive? Generalize.

78. [2.5] A perfect partition of the positive integer n is a finite sequence a1 


a2  · · ·  ak of positive integers ai , such that each integer 1  m  n
can be written uniquely (regarding equal ai ’s as indistinguishable) as a
sum of ai ’s. For instance, there are three perfect partitions of 5, viz.,
11111, 221, and 311, since we have the unique representations 1, 1 + 1,
1 + 1 + 1, 1 + 1 + 1 + 1, 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 in the first case; 1, 2, 2 + 1,
2 + 2, 2 + 2 + 1 in the second; and 1, 1 + 1, 3, 3 + 1, 3 + 1 + 1 in the
third. Show that the number of perfect partitions of n is equal to the
number of ordered factorizations of n + 1 into parts greater than one.
For instance, the ordered factorizations of 12 are 12, 6 · 2, 2 · 6, 4 · 3,
3 · 4, 2 · 2 · 3, 2 · 3 · 2, and 3 · 2 · 2, so there are eight perfect partitions
of 11.

79. [1] Here is a proof by induction that all people have the same height.
We prove that for any positive integer n, any group of n people all have
the same height. This is clearly true for n = 1. Now assume it for n,
and suppose we have a group of n + 1 persons, say P1 , P2 , . . . , Pn+1 .
By the induction hypothesis, the n people P1 , P2 , . . . , Pn all have the
same height. Similarly the n people P2 , P3 , . . . , Pn+1 all have the same
height. Both groups of people contain P2 , P3 , . . . , Pn , so P1 and Pn+1
have the same height as P2 , P3 , . . . , Pn . Thus all of P1 , P2 , . . . , Pn+1
have the same height. Hence by induction, for any n any group of n
people have the same height. Letting n be the total number of people
in the world, we conclude that all people have the same height. Is there
a flaw in this argument?

1
80. [1] The following figure consists of three equal squares lined up together,
with three diagonals as shown.

C
A B
Show that angle C is the sum of angles A and B.

81. [1] Let n be a positive integer.

(a) Show that if 2n − 1 is prime, then n is prime.


(b) Show that if 2n + 1 is prime, then n is a power of two.

Hint: The simplest way to show that a number is not prime is to factor
it explicitly.

82. (a) [2.5] A point P in the interior of an equilateral triangle T is at a


distance of 3, 5, and 7 units from the three vertices of T . What
is the length of a side of T ?

3 5

2
(b) [2.5] More generally, let the point P be at distances a, b, c from the
vertices A, B, C of an equilateral triangle of side length d. Find
a (nonzero) polynomial equation f (a, b, c, d) = 0, symmetric in
a, b, c, d.
(c) [2.5] The symmetry of f in a, b, c is obvious, but why also the
“hidden symmetry” in d? Find a noncomputational proof.
(d) [2.8] Generalize to n dimensions, i.e., find a (nonzero) polynomial
equation f (a0 , . . . , an , d) = 0, symmetric in all n + 2 variables,
satisfied by the distances a0 , . . . , an from a point to the vertices of
a regular simplex of side length d.
(e) [5] Give a noncomputational explanation of the hidden symmetry
of the variable d.

83. [3] Into how few pieces can an equilateral triangle be cut and reassem-
bled to form a square?

84. [2] Let n be an integer greater than one. Show that 1 + 21 + 31 + · · · + n1


is not an integer.

85. [2.5]

(a) Persons X and Y have nonnegative integers painted on their fore-


heads which only the other can see. They are told that the sum
of the two numbers is either 100 or 101. A third person P asks X
if he knows the number on his forehead. If X says “no,” then P
asks Y . If Y says “no,” then P asks X again, etc. Assume both
X and Y are perfect logicians. Show that eventually one of them
will answer “yes.” (This may seem paradoxical. For instance, if
X and Y both have 50 then Y knows that X will answer “no” to
the first question, since from Y ’s viewpoint X will see either 50
or 51, and in either case cannot deduce his number. So how does
either person gain information?)
(b) Generalize to more than two persons.

86. [2.5] Let a(n) be the exponent of the largest power of 2 dividing the
Pn 2i
numerator of i=1 i (when written as a fraction in lowest terms).
For instance, a(1) = 1, a(2) = 2, a(3) = 2, a(4) = 5. Show that
limn!1 a(n) = 1.

3
87. [3–] Write the permutation n, n − 1, . . . , 1 as a product of n2 (the
� 

minimum possible) adjacent transpositions si = (i, i+1), 1  i  n−1.


For instance, 321 = s1 s2 s1 (or s2 s1 s2 ). What is the least number of si ’s
we need to remove from this product in order to get a product equal to
the identity permutation 1, 2, . . . , n? For instance, if we remove s2 from
s1 s2 s1 then we get s21 = 123 (clearly the minimum possible for n = 3).
Does the answer depend on the way in which we write n, n − 1, . . . , 1
as a product of si ’s?

4
MIT OpenCourseWare
https://ocw.mit.edu/

18.A34 Mathematical Problem Solving (Putnam Seminar)


Fall 2018

For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: https://ocw.mit.edu/terms.

You might also like