Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah xx (xx): xx-xx (20xx)

DOI: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Effectiveness of Learning Module Autodesk Inventor Subjects

Drawings on Manufacturing Engineering

Fadly Nendra1*, Syahril2, Rijal Abdullah3, Yumn Jamilah4, Netriwati5

Technology and Vocational Education, Faculty of Engineering State University of Padang, Indonesia

______________ Abstratc: Judging from the learning models that use teachers who
Article History: are still centered on teachers or teacher centers pose boredom for
Received: xxxx xx, 20xx students, visible from the activities of many dreamy students,
Revised: xxxx xx, 20xx
Accepted: xxxx xx, 20xx
students do not listen to the teacher when explaining and students
Published: xxxx xx, 20xx rarely want to Answer questions from the teacher when given a
question. In this regard, students expect a learning model that creates
an effective, engaging, interactive and enjoyable learning process. In
_________ addition to the learning process, student learning activities are low,
Keywords: and the assignments given to students are generally not resolved
Effectiveness, Modules, based on the time specified. Referring to the problem of earning a
Manufacturing Engineering value that is not maximized, it is necessary the Autodesk Inventor
Drawings
application to overcome it because the program will make students
active and effective to learn so that the results can be better than
________________________ Previous. The research aims to determine the effectiveness of the
*Correspondence Address: Autodesk Inventor learning modules that have been developed. The
fadlynendra@gmail.com effectiveness test is done by giving the students pretests and posttest
instruments. Instruments of effectiveness using tests, and data
processed gain score. Autodesk Inventor Learning module is said to
be effective for improving student learning outcomes because 75% of
students have reached the Minimum mastery criteria. Based on these
results, it can be concluded that the Autodesk Inventor learning
module on the learning of the drawing of manufacturing techniques is
effectively used as a learning medium in the learning process of
subjects in manufacturing engineering drawings.

INTRODUCTION that contains the meaning of a tool that

Technical drawings are tools to implies of an engineering degree in the
express ideas or ideas of engineering form of engineering drawings (Suharto,
experts. Therefore, technical drawings are 2005:9).
often referred to as technical language or Along with current science and
language for technical experts in the technology developments, many drawing
technique used as a means to present the software are created with the aim of
idea of construction work. Thus in easing the design process. One type of
summary it can be said that the image software used to draw is Computer Aided
serves as a technical language in the Design (CAD). CAD can be interpreted as
machining industry (Khumaedi, 2009:1). a computer program to assist in creating,
The language of the technique in question modifying, and analyzing a product or
is the language for scholars of engineering part of a product. Design-making
© 2019 URPI Faculty of Education and Teacher Training
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
 Effectiveness of Learning Module … | F. Nendra, Syahril, R. Abdullah, Y. Jamilah, Netriwati

activities start from idea collection, explanation above, where the media has
sketching (drafts), creating models, not been used in the form of modules in
making detailed images, analyzing the classroom and still has not achieved
designs, up to creating simulations or the desired results of learning, then
animations. The use of CAD will cover researchers are interested to develop the
the entire design process and can be Learning module Autodesk Inventor
accommodated quickly and cheap. where the module can be used in the
So the industry will be more learning process of mechanical
effective and efficient in conducting the engineering drawings and can effectively
design process. In today's industrial improve the learning outcomes of the
world, CAD is increasingly trusted to help students. Therefore, the researcher's desire
with product design production. Many to research on "the development of
CAD programs are used in the industry, Autodesk Inventor learning modules on
among others: AutoCAD, Solidworks, the subjects of mechanical engineering
Autodesk Inventor, Catia, and so on. drawings".
The learning process that has been
done in the classroom still runs METHOD
conventionally i.e. a demonstration Method used should be
method that is dominated by lectures to accompanied by references, relevant
achieve the skills of mechanical modification should be explained.
engineering drawings, after learning the Procedure and data analysis technique
theory done then the teacher gave the task should be emphasized to literature review
to students work. So it can be concluded article.
that the learning process is only centered This type of research that will be
on the teacher. Learning the Teacher done is research and development or
Center here is the teacher to be the center research & development. This research
of the teaching and learning process that includes the research that produces new
occurs in the class (information delivery). products in a learning system. According
Such an atmosphere causes Sugiyono (2009: 3) development model
boredom for the students, seen from the used in this study is a model of Dick &
activities of the students who are many Carey (1996: 5-7) studies were conducted
daydream, students do not listen to the in class XI Department of Mechanical
teacher when explaining and students will Engineering SMKN 1 Padang totaling 24
rarely answer questions from the teacher students. Phase effectiveness is at the
when given a question. In this regard, development stage. This phase is
students expect a learning model that performed to assess whether the module
creates an effective, engaging, interactive that was developed can be used according
and enjoyable learning process. In to expectations for increased activity and
addition to the learning process, student student achievement. The instrument used
learning activities are low, and the to collect data is a media effectiveness
assignments given to students are tests. The tests used to obtain the data of
generally not resolved based on the time student learning outcomes are cognitive
specified. Referring to the problem of tests performed at the end of learning
earning a value that is not maximized, it is after using Module. After testing the
necessary the Autodesk Inventor modules, the next activity is to analyze
application to overcome it because the the data. The analyzed data is test data
program will make students active and modules developed.
effective to learn so that the results can be The effectiveness of this module is
better than Previous. From the determined by how to see whether the

xx | Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah xx (xx): xx-xx (20xx)

 Title | Author

achievement of the students ' learning Table 1. Result of the activity of grade XI students
outcomes by using the learning modules in mechanical engineering at SMKN 1 Padang.
Total Maximum Achieve
used at the time of research has reached a No
score score ment %
Criteria
minimum or no guidelines. The Data 1 77 100 77 HIGH
effectiveness gained from the cognitive 2 76 100 76 HIGH
3 79 100 79 HIGH
tests of students taken after using the 4 87 100 87 VERY HIGH
module during the learning process. The 5 83 100 83 VERY HIGH
6 77 100 77 HIGH
effectiveness test is done by comparing 7 86 100 86 VERY HIGH
the learning results before and after using 8 87 100 87 VERY HIGH
9 82 100 82 VERY HIGH
the module. The analysis used is analysis 10 88 100 88 VERY HIGH
of the difference in learning outcomes 11 86 100 86 VERY HIGH
12 79 100 79 HIGH
before and after the treatment using the 13 81 100 81 VERY HIGH
gain score. 14 79 100 79 HIGH
15 77 100 77 HIGH
16 77 100 77 HIGH
RESULT AND DISCUSSION 17 76 100 76 HIGH
18 79 100 79 HIGH
After doing research on class XI 19 87 100 87 VERY HIGH
Department of Mechanical Engineering at 20 83 100 83 VERY HIGH
21 77 100 77 HIGH
SMK 1 Padang then the data obtained 22 79 100 79 HIGH
after the implementation of the pretest to 23 82 100 82 VERY HIGH
24 76 100 76 HIGH
the student tests were analyzed manually 1940 2400 80.8 VERY HIGH
with Microsoft Exel, to determine the TOTAL SCORE 1940
distribution of the data, the average value MAXIMUM TOTAL SCORE 2400
PERCENTAGE ACTIVITIES 80.8%
and standard deviation of the data CATEGORY VERY HIGH
obtained. The results of the analysis of the
data pretest results presented in Table 1. Based on Table 1. the results of
student learning activities, it can be
Judging the effectiveness of student concluded that the activity of students in
activity. learning activities using learning modules
Student activity during the learning for Autodesk Inventor are at very high
activity was observed using student category.
activity observation instruments.
Observations were made during the Effectiveness seen from The difference
learning process. The observation of 4 in pretest results and posttest results
times the learning averaged to generalize
the results of observation of student  Data from pre-test
activity. The average results of student Data obtained after the initial test
activity is shown in the appendix to show to the students, its data as follows at
average results of student activity held on Table 2 below:
class XI Department of Mechanical
Engineering at SMK 1 Padang. Can be
seen in Table 1 below:

Table 2. Result of Pre-test Data Analysis

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah xx (xx): xx-xx (20xx) | xx

 Effectiveness of Learning Module … | F. Nendra, Syahril, R. Abdullah, Y. Jamilah, Netriwati

TOTAL MAXIMUM INFORMATI 1 27 40 65 66 FAIL

No SCORE SCORES
SCORE KKM
ON 2 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS
3 25 40 62.5 66 FAIL
4 26 40 65 66 FAIL
5 30 40 75 66 SUCCESS
6 32 40 80 66 SUCCESS
7 24 40 60 66 FAIL
8 26 40 65 66 FAIL
9 25 40 62.5 66 FAIL
10 35 40 87.5 66 SUCCESS
11 34 40 85 66 SUCCESS
12 25 40 62.5 66 FAIL
13 33 40 82.5 66 SUCCESS
14 24 40 60 66 FAIL
15 26 40 65 66 FAIL
16 24 40 60 66 FAIL
17 25 40 62.5 66 FAIL
18 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS
19 27 40 62.5 66 FAIL
20 28 40 70 66 SUCCESS
21 24 40 60 66 FAIL
22 24 40 60 66 FAIL
23 28 40 70 66 SUCCESS
24 27 40 67.5 66 SUCCESS
TOTAL SCORE 2157.5
AVERAGE SCORES 68.43
HIGH SCORES 95
LOWEST SCORE 65
TOTAL RESPONDENTS
10 % 42%
SUCCCES
TOTAL RESPONDENTS
14 % 58%
FAILED

From the data in table 2. Then

obtained the lowest pretests result with a
value of 55 and the highest pretests result
with a value of 80 with details of the
number of respondents due 10 students
with a percentage of 42% and respondents
who did not complete as much as 14
people with a percentage of 58%.

 Data from post-test

Data obtained after the posttest is
done, its data as follows at Table 3
below:
Table 3. Result of Post-test Data Analysis.
TOTAL MAXIMUM INFORMATI
No SCORE SCORES
SCORE KKM
ON

1 30 40 75 66 SUCCESS
2 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS
3 31 40 77.5 66 SUCCESS
4 26 40 65 66 FAIL
5 33 40 82.5 66 SUCCESS
6 33 40 82.5 66 SUCCESS
7 24 40 60 66 FAIL
8 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS
9 30 40 75 66 SUCCESS
10 35 40 87.5 66 SUCCESS
11 34 40 85 66 SUCCESS
12 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS
13 33 40 82.5 66 SUCCESS
14 24 40 60 66 FAIL
15 31 40 77.5 66 SUCCESS
16 26 40 65 66 FAIL

xx | Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah xx (xx): xx-xx (20xx)

 Title | Author

17 26 40 65 66 FAIL Gain Score Min 0.00

18 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS Gain Score Max 0.40
19 32 40 80 66 SUCCESS Gain Score 0.14
20 28 40 70 66 SUCCESS Category Medium
21 24 40 60 66 FAIL
22 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS
23 28 40 70 66 SUCCESS
24 29 40 72.5 66 SUCCESS
TOTAL SCORE 2157.5
AVERAGE SCORES 68.43
HIGH SCORES 95
LOWEST SCORE 65
TOTAL RESPONDENTS
18 % 75%
SUCCES
TOTAL RESPONDENTS
6 % 25%
FAILED

Based on data analysis in Table 3

above, then obtained the lowest post-tests
result with a value of 60 and the highest
post-tests result with a value of 87.5 with
a breakdown number of respondents Figure 1. Charts increase in student value
succesded as many as 18 students with a
percentage 75% and respondents who Analysis results are obtained in
failed 6 people with a percentage of 25% . Table 4. and Figure 1, judging by the
gain score min in the value can be 0.00
Analysis of difference pretest results and gain score max of 0.4 so that the gain
and posttest results (Gain Scores) score 0.14 categorized value is medium.
After learning the results of the From the average value in Pretests 68.43
analysis of the pretest and posttest and the average in posttest 73.12 with a
analysis results. the result of the difference of 4.6 value, this can be
difference between the pretest to posttest concluded the existence of the value of
results of data analysis as follows at table 4.6% for the effectiveness of students in
4 below: the development of Autodesk Inventor
Table 4. Result of Post-test Data Analysis. learning modules on the subject of
No
Score
Pretest
Score
Posttest
Posttes-
Pretest
100- score
pretest
Gain
Score
Drawings of manufacturing techniques.
1 67.5 75 7.5 32.5 0.23 Thus, the effectiveness of the
2 72.5 72.5 0 27.5 0.00 development of Autodesk Inventor
3 62.5 77.5 15 37.5 0.40
4 65 65 0 35 0.00 Learning module can be said to be very
5 75 82.5 7.5 25 0.30 well used in learning activities with the
6 80 82.5 2.5 20 0.13
7 60 60 0 40 0.00 gain of score 0.14.
8 65 72.5 7.5 35 0.21
9 62.5 75 12.5 37.5 0.33
10 87.5 87.5 0 12.5 0.00 CONCLUSION
11 85 85 0 15 0.00
12 62.5 72.5 10 37.5 0.27 This research has produced
13 82.5 82.5 0 17.5 0.00 Autodesk Inventor learning module which
14 60 60 0 40 0.00
15 65 77.5 12.5 35 0.36 can be used in learning in the subjects of
16 60 65 5 40 0.13 manufacturing engineering drawings. The
17 62.5 65 2.5 37.5 0.07
18 72.5 72.5 0 27.5 0.00 learning module of Autodesk inventor has
19 67.5 80 12.5 32.5 0.38 been through the process of effectiveness
20 70 70 0 30 0.00
21 60 60 0 40 0.00 test through the students ' study results,
22 60 72.5 12.5 40 0.31 namely pretests and posttest. The results
23 70 70 0 30 0.00
24 67.5 72.5 5 32.5 0.15 of its effectiveness test state that the
TOTAL SCORE 1642.5 1755 112.5 learning module of Autodesk Inventor is
AVERAGE SCORES 68.437 73.125 4.6875
in effective category. This research is able

Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah xx (xx): xx-xx (20xx) | xx

 Effectiveness of Learning Module … | F. Nendra, Syahril, R. Abdullah, Y. Jamilah, Netriwati

to provide feedback to the education Content Oriented Fertilization

provider, since the developed Autodesk Constructivism On Course
Inventor Learning module can improve Development Center On Higher
student learning outcomes. Teachers can Education". Unpublished thesis.
develop the Autodesk Inventor's learning Padang: Graduate UNP Padang.
module so that its use is not only limited Riduwan. 2010. Learning Easy-Employee
to learning the drawings of manufacturing Research for Teachers And
techniques but also can be used for other Researchers starters. Bandung:
learning. Alfabeta.
Sadiman, Arief S. et al. 2006. Media
REFERENCES Education (Definition,
Alchazin, Saiful AB 2011. Training Development and Utilization).
Module Autodesk Inventor 2012. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
Bogor: National Institute of Sudjana, Nana and Ahmad Rivai. 2007.
Aeronautics and Space. Media Teaching. Bandung: New
Arsyad, Azhar. 2006. Learning Media. Light Algensindo.
Jakarta: King Grafindo Persada. Suharto. 2005. Reading and
Autodesk Inventor. Retrieved Comprehension Image
fromhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Engineering. Jakarta: Directorate
Autodesk_inventor on 21 April of vocational education.
2019. Sugiyono. 2009. Quantitative Research
Anwar, S. 2014. Reliability and validity. Methods, Qualitative, and R & D.
Yogyakarta: Library Learning. Bandung: Alfabeta
Bilalis, Nicos. 2000. Computer Aided
Design CAD. Technical University
of Crete: Innoregio Project.
Borg, WR et al. 2002. Educational
Research: An Introduction
(seventh edition). New York and
London: Longman Inc.
Dick, W and Carey, L. 1996. The
Systematic Design of intruction.
New York: Harper Collins
Publishing.
Hidayat Nur and Ahmad Shanhaji. 2011.
Mastering Autodesk Inventor 3D
Mechanical Design. Bandung:
Informatics.
Jahidin, Saddam and Djauhar. 2013.
Design of 3D-Based Ship
Construction Autodesk Inventor
To Analyze Heavy Construction.
Journal of Engineering. (Volume
2, Number 1). P. 1-6.
Khumaedi, Muhammad. 2009. Textbooks
Engineering Drawings. Semarang:
Unnes
Nerita, Siska. 2011. "Development of a
Compact Disk (CD) Interactive

xx | Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah xx (xx): xx-xx (20xx)