0% found this document useful (0 votes)
306 views4 pages

Stiv2013 Human Computer Interaction Evaluation Report Rubric The Equine Centre of Uum G10

The document is an evaluation rubric for a project titled "The Equine Centre of UUM" created by group G10, consisting of two students, Visnu A/L Manimaran and Ramki A/L Kumar. The rubric contains criteria for assessing an overview of the report, the organization structure, and the content of the findings. Each criterion is scored on a scale from excellent to poor. The document provides a detailed framework for evaluating the key elements of the group's project report.

Uploaded by

Visnu Maran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
306 views4 pages

Stiv2013 Human Computer Interaction Evaluation Report Rubric The Equine Centre of Uum G10

The document is an evaluation rubric for a project titled "The Equine Centre of UUM" created by group G10, consisting of two students, Visnu A/L Manimaran and Ramki A/L Kumar. The rubric contains criteria for assessing an overview of the report, the organization structure, and the content of the findings. Each criterion is scored on a scale from excellent to poor. The document provides a detailed framework for evaluating the key elements of the group's project report.

Uploaded by

Visnu Maran
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

STIV2013 HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION

EVALUATION REPORT RUBRIC

PROJECT TITLE : THE EQUINE CENTRE OF UUM

GROUP NAME : G10

NAME / MATRIC NO. 1: VISNU A/L MANIMARAN 252959


NAME / MATRIC NO. 2: RAMKI A/L KUMAR 252840

Excellent Good Fair Poor


Criteria Marks TOTAL
4 3 2 1
1-OVERVIEW OF REPORT
Introduction of the The introduction The introduction The introduction is There is no
project provides a well- provides an adequate present. Identification introduction. The
developed context context for the of the purpose and purpose is not
for the project. project central questions is identified.
sketchy
Methodology Identifies appropriate Identifies appropriate Identifies appropriate The methodologies
(Sample, procedures, and methodologies and methodologies and methodologies and described are either
measures). evaluation evaluation evaluation techniques not suited or poorly
techniques. Provides techniques but some but many details are suited to evaluate the
appropriate details are missing or missing or vague. The application. The
justification for the vague. methodology is largely methodology is under-
process. incomplete. developed and/or is
not feasible.
Recommendation The recommendation The recommendation The recommendation The recommendation
is well written and effectively communicates ideas is poorly written and
ideas are well communicates ideas adequately, however confusing. Ideas are
developed and but some sections many sections are lack not communicated
explained. are lack of clarity. of clarity. effectively.
Citation/ Reference All sources cited and Some sources did not Some sources did not No citation or
referred. Use the been cited and been cited and reference. Does not
correct citation style. referred. Using the referred. Does not use use the correct citation
correct citation style. the correct citation style.
style.

Excellent Good Fair Poor


Criteria Marks TOTAL
4 3 2 1

2. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
Structure Writing is clear, Writing is mostly Writing is unclear Writing is unclear and
concise, and well clear, concise, and and/or disorganized. disorganized. Contents
organized with well organized with Contents of the report of the report ramble
excellent sentence/ good are not expressed in a and make little sense.
paragraph sentence/paragraph logical manner.
construction. construction.
Contents of the Contents of the
report are expressed report are expressed
in a coherent and in a coherent and
logical manner. logical manner.
Control of language and There are no more There are no more There are more than There are numerous
grammar than three spelling, than five spelling, five spelling, grammar, spelling, grammar, or
grammar, or syntax grammar, or syntax or syntax errors per syntax errors
errors per page of errors per page of page of writing. throughout the
writing. writing. response.
Figures and Tables All tables and figures Some figures and Figures and tables are There are no figures
have exceptionally tables are not not referenced in text. and tables referenced
thorough and well- referenced in text. Figure/ table captions in the report.
written captions. Some figure/ table are missing or unclear.
Figures and tables captions are missing Figures and tables are
are appropriately or unclear. Some illegible, unclear, and
sized, legible, and figures and tables inappropriately sized.
placed side by-side are illegible, unclear,
when appropriate. and inappropriately
sized.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Criteria Marks TOTAL
4 3 2 1
3. CONTENT (FINDINGS)
Required Components Report includes all Report includes all Report is missing some Report excludes
1. Visibility components and components and components and/or essential components
2. Efficiency meets or exceeds all meets all does not fully meet the and/or does not
3. Learnability requirements requirements requirements indicated address the
4. Consistency indicated in the indicated in the in the instructions. requirements indicated
instructions. Each instructions. Each Some components are in the instructions.
component is component is not addressed. Many components are
addressed addressed. addressed minimally,
thoroughly. inadequately, and/or
not at all.
Required Components Report includes all Report includes all Report is missing some Report excludes
1. Design aesthetic components and components and components and/or essential components
2. Navigation meets or exceeds all meets all does not fully meet the and/or does not
3. Functionality requirements requirements requirements indicated address the
4. Organization indicated in the indicated in the in the instructions. requirements. Many
instructions. Each instructions. Each Some components are components are
component is component is not addressed. addressed minimally,
addressed addressed. inadequately, and/or
thoroughly. not at all.
Required Components Report includes all Report includes all Report is missing some Report excludes
1.Ease of Use components and components and components and/or essential components
2. Content relevance meets or exceeds all meets all does not fully meet the and/or does not
3.Feedback requirements requirements requirements indicated address the
4. Error prevention indicated in the indicated in the in the instructions. requirements indicated
instructions. Each instructions. Each Some components are in the instructions.
component is component is not addressed. Many components are
addressed addressed. addressed minimally,
thoroughly. inadequately, and/or
not at all.

TOTAL (10%)

You might also like