Application Report: Quality Management
Application Report: Quality Management
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
R. Furter
October 2009
SE 634
THE STANDARD FROM FIBER TO FABRIC
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a re-
trieval system, translated or transmitted in any form or by any means, electroni-
cally, mechanically, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permis-
sion in writing of the copyright owner.
Contents
1 Introduction ................................................................................ 5
4 Conclusion................................................................................ 15
1 Introduction
Textile specialists and managers may have noticed that there was a signifi-
cant evolution in textile measuring technology in the past four decades,
particularly in the area of cotton classification and yarn testing because in
these two domains modern sensor technology and sophisticated scientific
methods can be applied. As a result, cotton of various growth areas as well
as all kinds of yarns can be compared easily because accurate figures are
available. This will lead to a standardization in the textile industry.
For a long period cotton was tested visually, mostly by certified classers,
because accurate electronic systems were not available. But the only qual-
ity parameter which certified classers could determine with a reasonable
accuracy was the fiber length. Many additional quality characteristics which
are nowadays also important such as the short fiber content, the fiber
strength and elongation, the maturity, the number of neps, the number of
dust and trash particles, could not be determined or had to be determined
with time-consuming manual instruments.
The China Fiber Inspection Bureau CFIB has also to installed such High
Volume Testing Systems in various locations. By 2010 the classing offices
in China will be completed. Table 1 and Table 2 show the replacement of
the human classer by Uster Fiber Testing Systems and the percentage of
electronically tested bales worldwide.
Table 2 also shows the amount of cotton which is tested with USTER® HVI
Systems in 14 cotton producing countries in 2010.
Year Country
1968 USA USDA starts to replace visual fiber inspection by automatic testing
1988 USA USDA classification system complete
1999 Uzbekistan Classification system in Uzbekistan complete
2001 Brazil Part of cotton fiber production classified with HVI systems
2002 Australia Classification system in Australia complete
2004 India (Maharashtra) Part of cotton fiber production classified with HVI systems
2005 Zimbabwe Part of cotton fiber production classified with HVI systems
2006 Turkmenistan Part of cotton fiber production classified
2006 Malawi Part of cotton fiber production classified
2007 Mexico Part of cotton fiber production classified
2007 Pakistan Part of cotton fiber production classified
2008 Kazakhstan Part of cotton fiber production classified
2008 Greece Classification system in Greece complete
2010 China Classification system in China complete
2010 Tadzhikistan Part of cotton fiber production classified with HVI systems
* One USTER® HVI System is used for the classification of 14’000 to 35’000
metric tons of cotton, depending on the number of shifts, the throughput rate of
the HVI Systems and the duration of cotton classing per year.
** Estimation for 2010: Total cotton production worldwide 23,6 mn tons
(Source: ICAC, September 8, 2009, Plenary Meeting, Cape Town, South Af-
rica)
With the USTER® HVI Systems a standardization of the cotton fiber pa-
rameters took place. As a result, the fiber parameters of cotton of various
growth areas can be compared throughout the world.
Such USTER® HVI Systems are also used for bale lay-down in spinning
mills. With the single fiber testing system USTER® AFIS the effect of the
spinning process on cotton fiber quality parameters can be measured from
the blowroom to the roving frame (Fig. 1).
Entangled fibers
Fig. 1
Measuring range of fiber
bundle and single fiber
testing system
The USTER® AFIS System is able to measure entangled and parallel fi-
bers. Therefore, in can be used for process control throughout the entire
spinning process (Fig. 2).
Ring
Finisher Roving Winding
Blowroom Card Drawframe Comber spinning
drawframe frame machine
machine
Increase or decrease of neps, reduction of short fibers, reduction of dust and trash
Fig. 2
Efficiency improvement of subsequent processes,
less fabric faults, less claims Purpose of fiber testing in
spinning mills
The USTER® AFIS System is used for the measurement of fiber damage,
the increase and reduction of neps, the reduction of short fibers, the reduc-
tion of dust and trash, etc., in each processing step. It is also used to
maximize the yield of fibers and the productivity.
In addition to this, the USTER® AFIS System serves for maintaining the
maximum yield of fibers and the highest possible production with the proc-
essed raw material.
With these tools as well as with cost considerations by means of Uster Cal-
culation Tools it will be possible to optimize the productivity as well as the
costs.
With the above mentioned USTER® HVI System as well as with the
USTER® AFIS System it is today possible to measure a wide variety of
quality characteristics shown in Table 3.
Dust (Count)
Table 3
Dust (Size) Cotton quality characteristics
®
determined by USTER HVI
Visible Foreign Matter ®
and USTER AFIS System
Quality characteristics
Micronaire below requirements
Fiber length
Short Fiber Index
Required quality
Uniformity Index characteristics exceeded
Maturity
Bundle Strength
Reflectance Rd
Yellowness +b
Trash (Area)
Trash (Count) Fig. 3
Neps Optimization of the fiber
quality characteristics
0% Cotton Quality Profile
50% 100% based on a Fiber Quality
defined by spinning mill
Profile
Fig. 3 shows that the raw material profile is not ideal for the yarn which has
to be produced in the spinning mill. Some of the cotton quality characteris-
tics exceed the requirements and some of the characteristics are below the
requirements. The adaptation of the raw material quality to the needs of the
yarn to be produced for a customer is a significant step towards quality
consistency and reduction of costs. Therefore, the fiber purchasing as well
as the blending in the blowroom is important. It is also obvious that in a
spinning mill with a wide variety of yarns an ideal fiber blend cannot be real-
ized, but it is highly recommended to approach the fiber quality profile as
good as possible. This is the area where most of the cost savings can be
realized.
This profile was based on an optimization process where the quality re-
quirements of the customer, the sustainability of the quality as well as the
costs played a fundamental role.
The spinning process causes various changes of the fiber quality character-
istics. The number of neps and the dust/trash particles are drastically re-
duced. The short fiber content, particularly in case of combing, is also re-
duced. If the fiber quality has to be known which finally ends in the yarn it is
advisable to measure the quality characteristics in the sliver of the finisher
drawframe.
Table 5 shows a Fiber Quality Profile for a sliver of the finisher draw-
frame. These figures have to be measured with the Uster AFIS System.
The fibers are used for a yarn of combed cotton, count range Ne 30 to Ne
50. Enduse: Shirts.
The standardization of the yarn quality characteristics began with the publi-
cation of the first USTER® STATISTICS in 1957 which served as bench-
marks to compare the yarn quality of various origins. The pressure for ac-
curate yarn quality characteristics was intensified in the past 10 years due
to the influence of the big retail names who had to improve the supply chain
management in order to keep the quality claims within reasonable limits.
For many spinning mills which have to supply yarns of consistent quality it
was a requirement to improve the quality, the productivity and to reduce the
costs. The tools for the determination of fiber and yarn quality characteris-
tics were used to establish a future-oriented quality management.
There are also a few fiber characteristics listed in Table 6. Many yarn buy-
ers do not specify the raw material because they are of the opinion that the
spinning mill must have the degree of freedom what kind of raw material
has to be used for a specified yarn.
The following items have motivated yarn buyers and retailers to better
specify yarns and to establish Yarn Quality Profiles:
For a sales agreement and for arguments in case of claims accurate figures are required to define
the yarn
Accurate figures are also required for spinning mills in order to deliver yarns of consistent quality
In order to use the Uster Calculation Tools to quickly compute cost improvements in spinning
mills, the managers of the mills need accurate figures to adapt the quality to the required specifi-
cations.
Count variation
Evenness
Thin places
Thick places
Neps
Hairiness
Twist
Required quality
Twist variation
characteristics exceeded
Tenacity
Tenacity variation
Quality characteristics
Elongation below requirements
Disturbing thick places
Fig. 4
Optimization of the yarn
Disturbing foreign fibers
quality characteristics
Yarn quality profile based on a yarn quality
0% 50% 100% agreed with customer
profile
Table 7 represents a yarn quality profile for a weaving yarn with only a few
specified quality characteristics.
Table 7 Agreement on minimum or maximum requirements / Ring-spun yarn, cotton 100%, combed, for woven fabrics,
bobbins
All the values are either specified as maximum values (count variation,
evenness, imperfections) or minimum values (strength, elongation) or as a
range (hairiness). All the values are based on the USTER® STATISTICS as
benchmarks.
Table 8 shows a Yarn Quality Profile where minimum requirements for the
applied cotton fibers are also specified. Particularly important for some yarn
buyers are the remaining short fibers in the sliver of the finisher drawframe.
®
Nominal Yarn Count (Nec) 28 32 36 40 USTER
Cotton Fibers Instrument Unit Limits STATISTICS
Number of neps, bale AFIS 1/g max 270 270 195 195 50%
Micronaire, bale HVI - Range 3.8 – 4.5 3.8 – 4.5 3.8 – 4.5 3.8 – 4.5
Fiber Length UHML HVI mm min 28 28 31 31 50%
Fiber Length UQL(w), bale AFIS mm min 29 29 32 32 50%
Short Fiber Content SFC(n), finisher drawframe AFIS % max 13 12 11 10 50%
Yarn Count and Twist
Deviation of Count UAS % max ± 2.5 ± 2.5 ± 2.5 ± 2.5
Count Variation CVb UAS % max 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 50%
Twist Multiplier alpha e UZT - max 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 50%
Variation of Twist CVt UZT % max 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 30%
Direction of Twist UZT - Z Z Z Z
Yarn Evenness and Hairiness
®
USTER Evenness CVm UT % max 11.5 11.9 12.2 12.5 20%
Thin Places - 40% UT 1/km max 24 40 62 91 20%
Thin Places - 50% UT 1/km max 1 1 2 2 20%
Thick Places + 35% UT 1/km max 172 213 254 294 20%
Thick Places + 50% UT 1/km max 15 18 22 25 20%
Neps +140% UT 1/km max 154 204 261 325 20%
Neps + 200% UT 1/km max 24 32 41 50 20%
®
USTER Hairiness UT - max 6.6 6.3 6.0 5.8 50%
Yarn Strength and Elongation
Single End Strength conventional, 5 m/min UTR cN/tex min 16.3 16.3 16.4 16.4 60%
Strength Variation CVb conventional, 5 m/min UTR % max 7,6 7,9 8.2 8.4 50%
Single End Elongation conventional, 5 m/min UTR % min 5.1 5.1 5.0 5.0 60%
Single End Strength high speed, 400 m/min UTJ cN/tex min 18.3 18.4 18.6 18.7 60%
Strength Variation CVb high speed, 400 m/min UTJ % max 7.9 8.2 8.5 8.7 50%
Single End Elongation high speed, 400 m/min UTJ % min 4.9 4.8 4.7 4.7 60%
Significant CLASSIMAT Faults, remaining
A3+B3+C2+D2, cumulative * UCQ 1/100 km max 14 14 14 14 50%
E UCQ 1/100 km max 0 0 0 0 50%
H2 + I2 UCQ 1/100 km max 0 0 0 0 50%
Foreign fibers A3+B2+C1+D1+E1, cumulative UCQ 1/100 km max 0 0 0 0 50%
Yarn friction, waxed yarn
Coefficient of friction UZF - max 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
Table 8 Agreement on requirements / Ring-spun yarn, cotton 100%, combed, for knitted fabrics, cones
4 Conclusion
The accurate specification of cotton and all kinds of yarns (cotton, blended,
100% synthetic) is an enormous support for spinning mills to buy cotton
according to minimum requirements. Together with a precise measurement
of yarn quality characteristics a standardization takes place within a signifi-
cant domain of the textile industry (raw material and yarn) where all the
specialists and managers use the same language.
Uster Technologies AG
Sonnenbergstrasse 10
CH-8610 Uster / Switzerland
Phone +41 43 366 36 36
Fax +41 43 366 36 37
www.uster.com
sales@uster.com