Lecture 14.

5: Space Structure Systems

OBJECTIVE/SCOPE

To describe different types of spatial truss systems, and the design parameters to be
considered. To give guidance on initial sizing and on analysis methods. To describe
fabrication and erection procedures.

PREREQUISITES

Lecture 1B.3: Background to Loadings

Lecture 6.3: Elastic Instability Modes

Lecture 7.12: Trusses and Lattice Girders

RELATED LECTURES

Lectures 13: Tubular Structures

Lecture 14.6: Special Single Storey Structures

SUMMARY

The lecture provides an historical background and an overview of different types of spatial
truss systems: double-layer grids, barrel vaults and domes. Design parameters are introduced
and some rules for initial sizing are described. The principles of different methods of analysis
are given. The lecture concludes by describing aspects of fabrication and erection particular
to these structures.

1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Definitions

For this lecture, trusses are defined as structural systems in which the members are
interlinked so that they are only subject to axial compressive or tensile forces.

This definition assumes that no action is applied directly onto the members. All loads are
applied to the joints which are known as 'nodes'. In case it is impossible to guarantee the
coincidence of member axis, the bending effect resulting from this must be evaluated. It is
particularly important to ensure that the axes of the members coincide (Figure 1). Only
perfect pins could completely ensure compliance with this loading condition. The
technological construction of assemblies deviates to some extent from this theoretical
situation and, in effect, is one of the main difficulties associated with these structural systems.
The lecture is concerned mainly with truss systems for roofs, which span in two directions
(termed 'space structures'). Other arrangements are possible, such as continuous systems,
based on the Vierendeel girder (Figure 2) in which diagonal bracing members are
unnecessary because the bending behaviour is predominant, rather than the axial one; the
resulting voids can be used to accommodate mechanical and electrical services.

1.2 Historical Background

Until the 1960s, almost all truss systems were two-dimensional. They had developed from
timber roofs, which themselves had evolved from a basic triangular arrangement to more
complex shapes (Figure 3). The need to lighten long tie beams and reduce bending stresses
(Figure 3a) had led to the introduction of a suspender (Figure 3b). A similar concern to
reduce bending of the rafters led to the introduction of diagonal members (Figure 3c). By
dividing the suspended member in two, the familiar arrangement of Figure 3d was obtained.
The use of metal became dominant in the 19th century for all types of structures except
domestic buildings. Articulated systems (Figure 4) commonly used for roofs of railway
stations were perfect examples of the two-dimensional triangulated system. The second half
of the 19th century was characterised by some remarkable achievements, for example the
Garabit viaduct in France (Figure 5) and the Maria Pia bridge in Oporto, both designed by
Eiffel.
Although spatial systems were proposed early in the 20th century, their use in practice has
arisen from the more recent development of computer methods for analysis, the functional
need for spaces free of columns and from demands of architectural appearance.

1.3 Different Types of System

1.3.1 Introduction

Different types of spatial truss systems are normally classified according to their general
shape. The following may therefore be distinguished [1]:

 two dimensional grids

 cylindrical vaults
 domes.

In each case it is advisable to distinguish between single and double or even triple layer grids.
The number of layers depends on the span. A third characteristic lies in the geometry chosen
for the system of members in the layers and possibly in the composition of the bracing of the
layers.

1.3.2 Two dimensional grids

1.3.2.1 Single layer grids

These grids are mentioned only as a reminder that these systems are beam grillages which
work in bending and torsion, rather than under axial compression and tension.
Depending on the directions assigned to the members, grids may be identified in two, or three
directions (Figure 6). Grids in two diagonal directions are more rigid (beams follow the
direction of the principal stresses of the equivalent plates) and are widely used. Utilisation is
restricted to about 10m of span.

1.3.2.2 Double layer grids

These grids comprise two systems of members on two parallel levels (upper and bottom
layer). Both these systems are interlinked by bracing members (web members) (Figure 7).
Two types of double layer grids may be distinguished (Figure 8):
 lattice grids where there are always top and bottom chords in the same vertical plane
(Figure 8a).
 spatial grids, made up of triangular based pyramids, square or hexagonal (Figure 8b).
Two kinds may be identified: one where the layer geometries are identical though
 displaced (offset grids), and the other where the layer geometries are different
(differential grids).

These systems are suitable for spans up to 100m. For greater spans, it is necessary to
incorporate triple layer grids, to avoid long members otherwise necessary with the increased
depth.

The size of the constituent modules depends on several factors, principally: span, load,
cladding system, type of node, transportation and erection facilities.

For spans of between 30 and 40m, member lengths of about 1,5m to 3m are acceptable.

The advantages of double layer grids are numerous:

 they are three dimensional structures which can withstand loads from any direction.
 they are hyperstatic, and buckling of some compression members does not cause the
whole to collapse as has been demonstrated by mathematical models and experiments.
 their rigidity minimises deflections.
 they have a very good fire resistance.
 their composition allows factory pre-fabrication in modular elements, which are easily
transported. Fabrication precision ensures ease of assembly and erection.
 they allow a wide choice of support positions owing to modular construction.
 the space between the two layers may be used to install electricity, electrical and
thermal piping, etc.
 installation is carried out by bolting and may be done whatever the atmospheric
conditions.
 they provide indisputable aesthetic qualities.

From an economic point of view, it is important to have a minimum number of nodes. It is

therefore necessary to compromise between this criteria and those determined by the choice
of module sizes.

1.3.3 Cylindrical vaults

In the history of construction, cylindrical vaults appear as an evolution of arches. The use of
metal has enabled construction to be carried out with factory prefabricated elements which
may be assembled on site. The first example to recall is the Crystal Palace which was erected
by Joseph Paxton for the Great Exhibition in 1851.

This shape has proved to be suitable for roofs of halls, railway stations and sports facilities,
e.g. in-door tennis courts.

Maximum efficiency may be attained for shapes with rectangular surfaces and a length/width
ratio of between 1 and 2. The optimum shape (rise/span ratio) is in the region of 0,15 to 0,20
(Figure 9).
Several layer geometries are possible (Figure 10). In practice, three directional systems offer
the most advantages. They may usually be analysed by assuming pin-jointed behaviour for
the nodes. This assumption does not hold, however, for some systems where bending rigidity
must be taken into account, e.g. for a vault composed of prefabricated elements rigidly joined
by high strength bolts.
The sensitivity of these systems to asymmetrical actions, in particular to wind, should not be
underestimated. Such actions can even bring about force reversal in the members, which is an
additional reason for choosing a three directional geometry in which the length of all
elements is identical.

In the same way, choice of support conditions along the boundaries influences force
distribution.
Economical spans for single layer vaults are in the region of 20m. Spans may be increased by
inserting diagonal elements. They reach 60m for double layer systems, in some cases even
more. Appropriate weights for double layer systems vary between 0,13 and 0,25kN/m2
depending on the intended shape, support conditions and on the geometry of the sheets (for a
uniform load of between 0,75 and 1,50kN/m2).

1.3.4 Domes

Domes constitute one of the most ancient forms of construction. However big or small their
size, the outline of the two-dimensional support is normally circular on plan.

Skeletal dome structures can be classified into several categories depending on the orientation
and position of principal members. The four more popular types are: ribbed domes,
Schwedler domes, three-way grid domes and parallel lamella domes (Figure 11).
Domes are of special interest to architects and engineers because they provide the maximum
enclosed volume for minimum surface area. In the last 25 years construction with steel
sections has largely replaced reinforced concrete. The first two examples concern single and
double layer systems. These systems permit spans of about 40m and more than 100m
respectively. Some double layer solutions have encouraged 'record' spans of more than 200m.

The accurate analysis of domes has only been possible with the introduction of computers
which have allowed an accurate study of elastic behaviour. It is important to note that large
span single layer domes subjected to asymmetrical actions can experience global instability
effects. In addition to consideration of local buckling of compression elements, specific
attention should be drawn to possible global 'snap-through' buckling (Figure 12). The action
of wind is not very well known; application of factored actions to a non-critical load case
does not necessarily cover the most unfavourable situation and recognition of an appropriate
excess weight does not necessarily bring about the most unfavourable situation.

From the physical point of view, it is important to stress the difference in behaviour of domes
with respect to cylindrical vaults. The sensitivity to asymmetrical actions and the resistance to
global buckling phenomena is strictly connected to the rigidity of the geometrical shape. For
cylindrical vaults, their surface has a single curvature, so it can be developed on plan. In
contrast, domes, having a double curvature, resist any actions by virtue of the shape itself.

Definition of the geometric arrangement of elements, whether for a single or a double layer
construction, is a difficult problem to resolve. Research is aimed at using fewer different
lengths for the members. Moreover, it is important to check that the polygons defined are as
similar as possible, in order to facilitate cladding. Fuller designed one of the first big
developments: the dome of the American Pavilion in Montreal (1967) which is composed of
two interconnected layers and constructed with welded tubular sections; the resulting
structure is 5/8 of a total sphere, with a diameter of 75m.

2. DESIGN OF SPATIAL TRUSS SYSTEMS

2.1 Conceptual design

At the conceptual design stage it is important to define the geometry of the structure, given
that determining support positions is an important factor in the strength and rigidity of the
system.

Geometric design parameters are:

 the overall shape; flat shape or assembly of small flat shapes (so called "polyhedric
surfaces"), curved surfaces (generally positive double curved surfaces; one of the
curvatures may be equal to zero, i.e. the case of cylindrical vaults). For curved
 surfaces, a rise/span ratio should be fixed to satisfy both mechanical and architectural
criteria, e.g. in order to avoid domes which are too shallow.
 geometry of the cladding supports.
 the number of layers; structural depth/span ratio influences the weight, strength and
cost.
 frequency of mesh, i.e. number of geometric elements for a given length.

The choices made directly influence the number of members converging on each node and on
the connecting angles between these members; these two parameters determine the feasibility
of the nodes. Too many elements meeting at different angles and lack of repetition are
hindrances to construction efficiency. The choice of spacing of grids should be related to
geometric connections, particularly the connection of the two-dimensional sides of a
polyhedric surface.

Choice of support conditions does not pose any specific problems, but it does affect
behaviour.

It should be noted that, because of the low weight of these structures, the weight of the
equipment supported by the structure should not be negligible. Similarly, actions resulting
from the method of construction should be carefully examined. The effects of concentrated
actions and of partially distributed loads, which are greater when the total loading is not
symmetrically distributed, should be examined. Except in specific cases, dynamic actions can
be replaced by enhanced static actions.

2.2 Design Method

Every project is undoubtedly an individual case. Nevertheless, it is possible to establish

sequential steps in the development of the design. Most importantly it should be noted that,
for a shape to be covered in any pre-determined way, two distinct methods can be used to
define the general surface:

 either the overall surface geometry is defined a priori: a geometric division must then
be made, e.g. a geodesic division for domes.
 or the generating module is laid as before and multiplication of this module provides
the final geometry.

Once the overall geometry has been established, the designer must decide on the number of
layers. This design depends basically on the free span, and also on the geometric distribution
of the members in and between the layers. Choice of frequency of mesh is important for
reasons of resistance and cost, as well as for aesthetic reasons. Choice in the geometry of the
network of members directly influences behaviour of the systems. For example, in the case of
double layer grids, an examination of different geometric arrangements has confirmed the
importance of adopting an arrangement where directions of the members in the two layers are
set at 45.

It is therefore possible to examine the structural behaviour under appropriate combinations of

actions. Choice of support conditions has a big influence on the distribution of internal forces
and size of the deflections. The possible use of multi-point supports is an important
advantage of spatial trusses. Definition of the areas of the cross-sections of the elements may
lead to a process of optimisation suitable for the design model.
2.3 Initial Sizing

It is possible to provide further information in the case of double layer two dimensional grids.
The curves in Figure 13 illustrate the variation in weight suitable for different structural
depths with the slenderness ratio for seven different geometries (Figures 14-20).
Calculations were made for the case of a square outline with peripheral supports under each
node, assuming a uniformly distributed load. In addition, the following data have been
assumed:

 take a depth/span ratio of 1:15 in relation to the free span where there is a working
load of 1,50kN/m2;.
 consider a self weight of about 0,15 to 0,20kg/m2 for spans up to 30m.

It is also important to consider the relation between the size of the mesh element and depth of
the grid.

2.4 Choice of the Structural System

As soon as the overall shape of the structure is defined, it is necessary to choose the structural
system.

A wide variety of structural systems is available, which can fulfil the geometrical
requirements of the design. However, they cannot all provide the load carrying capacity
which is required to resist the most unfavourable design loading conditions.

The sizing of the cross-section of members is a task of the designer, whereas the producer of
the structural system must guarantee that the node-member combination should be able to
give a joint of full strength type. Only by means of appropriate qualification procedures can
this guarantee be realised.

2.5 Qualification Procedure

The qualification procedure should demonstrate that the system for the space structure is
based on a basic node - member joint which is a full strength type. The demonstration can be
done by calculation and by tests.

On the one hand, it is possible to model the node-member joint by means of finite element
techniques. However, it is not prudent to rely solely on these numerical results.

On the other hand, only experimental evidence can fully demonstrate the actual behaviour of
the system.

For these reasons, the qualification procedure should be based mainly on laboratory tests, the
results validating the calculations. A suggested procedure could be based on the following
phases:

 monoaxial tests on the node;

 monoaxial tests on the member-to-node connection;
 bending and shear tests on full-scale structural units;
 bending tests, monotonic and cyclic, in the elastic range (including temperature
effects) up to collapse on full-scale prototypes.

3 ANALYSIS OF SPACE TRUSS SYSTEMS

3.1 Different Analysis Methods

The objective of an analysis of truss systems is to determine the values of the variables
necessary for sizing purposes and for those required to size their supports. The variables
generally required may be:

 compressive and tensile forces in the members in the system.

 node displacements.
 values of support reactions.

The study has to be made for several cases of actions and combinations of actions. The most
unfavourable cases are used as the basis for design.

Depending on the type of problem being examined, it is not necessary to determine all
unknown quantities. The methods of analysis available can be classified as follows:

i. Method of joints: applicable to two-dimensional systems which are internally isostatic

(Figure 21), for which the reactions have previously been determined. It is possible to
determine the forces in all members. They can be determined by analytical or graphical
methods (see Figures 22 and 23).
ii. Method of sections: in certain cases, this method can give direct access to internal forces
in a limited number of members selected by the designer. It is used, for example, for
preliminary design work in order to assess the maximum forces in a triangulated system
(Figure 24).
iii. Displacement method: This is the most general method. It is applicable to two-
dimensional and spatial systems, isostatic or hyperstatic. It gives values for all unknown
quantities: internal forces, displacements, reactions.

3.2 Design Assumptions

In addition to use of principles which are common to all structures in respect of actions and
their combinations, Eurocode 3 [2] allows a perfectly pin-jointed model for global analysis.

Furthermore, it is considered that all actions are applied at the systems nodes. It is sufficient
to assume linear-elastic response.

Calculations in the elasto-plastic range can be done by using simplified models of the
members such as is shown in Figure 25. The results show that a reasonably stable response of
compression elements (after the ultimate load of a member is reached) can be achieved and
the forces transferred to the adjacent members from that which has reached its ultimate
resistance.
The methods described in the following paragraphs are all based on the application of
equilibrium to the forces applied by the members to the nodes. The pin-jointed analysis used
for triangulated systems simplifies the formulae for equilibrium: in general, the three
equations relating to translational equilibrium are necessary.

3.3 Limit of Validity of the Methods Described

Attention is drawn to the fact that the methods described do not take account of:

 any non-coincidence of the axes of the members forming a node.

 flexure induced by the application of external actions but along the length of
members, rather than at nodes.
 secondary bending moments due to the effective rigidity of the joints which no longer
corresponds with the assumption of pin-jointed behaviour.
 non-linearity due to geometry and/or to material.

It is therefore necessary to evaluate carefully the significance of factors associated with

failure to ensure the appropriateness of the assumed models, either by making additional
calculations, or if applicable, by using more detailed calculation models, e.g. the generalised
displacements model which takes account of stiffness in flexure and in torsion, when the
given joint is far from the pin-jointed assumption.

3.4 Displacement Method

This is the most general method applicable in all cases of space structures. The behaviour of
the materials is assumed to be elastic and linear.

The principle of the method lies in resolving a system of linear equilibrium equations as
follows:

[K] {D} = {F}

where

[K] is the structure stiffness matrix.

{D} is the unknown displacement vector.

{F} is the vector of known actions.

The components of {D} corresponding to the fixed supports are zero. The corresponding
equations, the second components of which are the reactions, do not therefore appear in the
corresponding system of linear equations. Determination of the displacements enables the
internal forces to be calculated. This method is normally implemented by computer software.

4. FABRICATION OF SPACE TRUSSES

4.1 Introduction

The very nature of spatial trusses encourages research into maximum standardisation, linked
to individual component manufacture, and requires particular attention to problems of
precision.

It is advantageous to design spatial trusses with a minimum number of different members; the
same criteria should be used for the nodes. It is common to use members with the same
section sizes, independent of their different stress state due to their location in the structure.
For tubular sections, it seems reasonable, however, to keep the same external diameter and to
vary the wall thickness.

Installation methods may cause greater deformations and forces during erection than after
completion. The designer should consider the erection phases when sizing the elements.

4.2 The Structural System

The structural system is characterized by the combination of three main components:

 member
 node
 connection

Members
Hollow sections are essential for a number of reasons. In particular, tubular sections are
generally used because of their large and uniform radius of gyration.

Nodes

The dream of a 'universal' node has not yet been realised. Several parameters govern the
design of nodes. Nodes can be connected mainly by welding, bolting or by special
fabrication. Except where pretensioned bolts are used, bolted connections reduce the
resistance of net-sections. Some authorities prefer welding for large spans, even if it is
difficult to guarantee the quality of welds in site. One of the determining factors in the choice
of nodes is the number of members to be assembled. Apart from structural influences on the
node itself, this problem is linked to the way the members are connected to the node and to
considerations of space and ease of installation. The regularity of geometry resulting from the
node determines the entire geometry of the structure. Significant progress has been made in
this area through computerisation linking design and fabrication. As a result, it is possible to
fabricate nodes by varying the angles of incidence of the members.

Five 'kinds' of nodes may be identified, Figure 26:

 plate nodes (Figure 26a)

  folded nodes (Figure 26b)
 cast nodes (Figure 26c)
 nodes of extruded aluminium section (Figure 26d)
 special connections with spherical nodes (Figure 26e)

Plated and folded nodes are usually connected to the member ends by means of bolted
connections, but also welding can be done.

The node is a critical element when evaluating the cost of spatial structures: one node for 2,5-
3,0m2 would seem to be an economical solution.

Connections

The node-to-member joining system determines how the ends of the members must be
treated. Five processes may be described, for example, (Figure 27):

 Straight cutting (Figure 27b)

 Profiled cutting (Figure 27c)
 Squashed and drilled (Figure 27d)
 Addition of a connection plate (Figure 27e)
 Special fixing: threading, welding, or bolt crushing (Figure 27a)
It is clear that not all these systems give full strength joints.

4.3 Methods of Fabrication and Erection

Methods used may be listed in three categories:

a. Erection of separate members, each one lifted into position and connected to the work
already assembled.

b. Erection of sub-assemblies: this is an intermediate stage whereby the members are

connected in sub-assemblies, either in the factory or on site. The sub-assemblies are lifted
into final position and connected to the work already assembled.
c. Lifting of the whole space structure, which is assembled on the ground on site. Various
methods may be considered ranging from the use of vertical construction parts as lifting
masts to cranes.

The choice of one of these three methods depends on:

 the nature of the project in terms of type of structure and size.

 operational conditions: actual layout of the site, available means of lifting, transport
costs, experience, etc.
 safety.

In a) and b) it is essential to predict the need for any temporary supports that may be
necessary where the structure achieves stability only when it is complete. The many phases in
erection should be carefully examined so as to avoid intermediate structural behaviour which
is less favourable than that for the final state of the structure.

Lifting the whole space frame has the following advantages:

 the greater part of the work is carried out on the ground, thus aiding control of the
operation, especially the making of welded joints.
 the use of heavy hoisting machinery is required for a shorter period, which may
reduce final costs.
 in some cases, the structure with other equipment attached may be lifted together.

Hoisting is a critical stage in erection. Lifting points should be carefully examined. Lifting
should be carried out in the best meteorological conditions and certainly not in wind. Once in
position, the structure should be connected to the work already erected. Precise regulating
devices should be planned in advance in order to facilitate connection and fixing. The lifting
stage can be a determining factor in the design of the structure.

A new approach has been used in Barcelona for the erection of the dome of the Olympic
Palace. It involves the fabrication of the dome on the ground in five portions which are
temporarily pinned to each other (Figure 28). The central portion is then lifted and the
remaining segments of the dome locked in the final position.
Different methods of execution may be considered depending on the type of structure and
place of installation.

For example, it is possible to carry out assembly using a launching method borrowed from
bridge construction, etc. There is no limit to the list of solutions. The erection method chosen
depends on the imagination and know-how of the designer within a particular context.

5. CONCLUDING SUMMARY
 The lecture has been concerned with space roof structures in which members are
subject to internal axial forces.
 The structures may take the form of:

 two-dimensional grids.
 cylindrical vaults.
 domes.

 Unsymmetrical patterns of loading must be considered, including combinations of

actions that may arise during erection.
 The displacement method of analysis, implemented by computer software, is the most
convenient approach to determine internal forces, displacements of nodes and support
reactions.
 Repetition of nodes and members permits the use of standard components and reduces
the costs associated with design, detailing and fabrication.

6. REFERENCES
[1] Makowski, Z.S.: "Structures Spatiales en Acier", Centre Belge-Luxembourgeois
d'Information de l'Acier, 1964.

[2] Eurocode 3: "Design of Steel Structures": ENV 1993-1-1: Part 1.1: General rules and
rules for buildings, CEN, 1992.

7. ADDITIONAL READING
1. Mainstone, R. "Developments in Structural Form", MIT Press 1975.
2. Makowski, Z.S. "Space Frames and Trusses" from Constructional Steel Design,
Elsevier Applied Science, 1992.
3. Makowski, Z.S. "Analysis, Design and Construction of Braced Domes". Granada,
1984.
4. Fuller, R.B., Marks, R. "The Dymaxion World of R.B Fuller". Anchor Books 1973.
5. Motro, R. "Optimisation de Structures Spatiales et Application à des Grilles à Double
Nappe". Revue du Centre Technique Industriel de la Construction Métallique. No. 2,
Juin 1976, pp. 24-36.
6. Livesley, R.K. "Matrix methods of structural analysis". Pergamon Press, 1964.
7. Tsuboi, Y. "Analysis, Design and Realisation of Space Frames, a state-of-art report".
Bulletin de l'IASS n 84/85 Avril, Août 1984, Volume XXV-1/2.

http://fgg-web.fgg.uni-lj.si/~/pmoze/ESDEP/master/wg14/l0500.htm