PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND
INTERPRETATION OF DATA
RESPONDENT’S PROFILE
Respondents Age
N= 365
AGE F %
11-15 109 29.86%
16-20 104 42.20
21-25 94 25.75
Other/s 8 2.19
TOTAL 365 100%
● Analysis:
● Table 1 showed that mostly of the respondents
at the age 16-20 got the highest
● percentage of 42.20 % and other/s got the
lowest percentage of 2.19%. This could
● means that usually going to canteens are from
the age of 16-20 years old.
Respondents Gender
N= 365
GENDER F %
FEMALE 241 66.03%
MALE 124 33.97
TOTAL 365 100%
● Analysis:
● Based on the data gathered Table 2, majority of
the respondents is female with
● the equivalent of 66.03% and male got of
33.97% only. That means females preferred to
● eat at the school canteens.
Respondents Allowance
Allowance F %
50-100 130 35.62%
101-150 80 21.92%
151-200 60 16.44%
201-250 51 13.97%
Other/s 44 12.05%
TOTAL 365 100%
● Analysis:
● As of the data revealed in Table 3, have the
highest percentage of 35.62 that the
● respondents have the allowance of 50-100.
Unlike others that have the lowest
● percentage of 12.05 that have the allowances
of 250 pesos above. Therefore we can
● conclude that based on the limited of their
allowances the high price of the food that the
● canteen offered can affect our respondents.
Respondents Background
N=365
Department F %
SBM 40 10.96%
CAS 16 4.38
CoPH 53 14.52
CoEd 12 3.29
CEA 26 7.12
CoN 9 2.47
CCS 8 2.19
COA 20 5.48
COL 29 7.95
COSW 13 3.56
SHS 60 16.44
JHS 79 21.64
Total 365 100%
● Analysis:
● The Table 4 shows that majority of our
respondents is from the JHS with the
● equivalents of 21.64% and CCS got the lowest
population of student equivalent to
● 2.19%. This means that most the students
enrolled as of this school year is from JHS.
Project Profile
Respondent's usually buy foods
N=365
CANTEEN F %
Small Canteen 205 56.16%
Big Canteen 160 43.84
Total 365 100
● Analysis:
● Based on Table 5, majority of the respondents
usually buy foods from the small
● canteen which is equivalent to 56.16%
compared to big canteen while there are about
● 43.84% only. Therefore the respondents prefer
to go to small canteen.
Respondents purchase/ avail food
from the canteen
N=365
Length of Time F %
Daily 313 85.75%
Weekly 37 10.14
Monthly 15 4.11
TOTAL 365 100%
● Analysis:
● Table 6, present mostly of the respondents
purchase/ avail from the canteen is
● from daily with 85.75% high and monthly with
4.11% low. This means that the
● respondents purchase/ avail food from the
canteen is according to their daily needs
Respondents like both canteens
lower their prices
N=365
Option F %
YES 335 91.78%
NO 30 8.22
TOTAL 365 100
● Analysis:
● According to data gathered majority of the
respondents choose yes with 91.78%
● high, unlike to the other option which is the no
with 8.22% low. Therefore based on the
● respondent’s perception they like that the
canteen lowered their price especially in big
● canteen.
Respondents agreeable to consider
the Pricing strategy between the
small and big canteens
Agreeable to consider F %
Strongly Agree 146 40%
Agree 175 47.94
Disagree 29 7.95
Strongly Disagree 15 4.11
TOTAL 365 100%
● Analysis:
● Based on Table 8, the data presents according
to the agreeable to considered is
● that agree got 47.94% compared to strongly
disagree got 4.11% . That means that the
● respondents agreeable to consider the pricing
strategy between the small and big
● canteens
Rate for the pricing strategy
between the small and big canteens
QUESTION F %
Quality of the product 4.04 SATISFIED
Reasonable Price 3.75 FAIR
Good Packaging 4.32 SATISFIED
Quality Service 3.67 FAIR
Cleanliness of the place 3.56 FAIR
GRAND MEAN 3.87 FAIR
● Analysis:
● Table 9 shows that the respondent’s rate for the
pricing strategy between the
● small and big canteens has the grand mean of
3.87 which translate to fair scale which
● have a good pricing strategy.
Recommendation/ Suggestions
N=356
● Ventilation of the place
● Improve and balance the food taste
● Make the place wider
● Aim for a price that’s beneficial for both
students and sellers
● Lower the price
● Try to think new strategy for the satisfaction
of the customer
● Make new improvement of food that they
serve.
● Make a lot of improvement
● Make the price of the food canteen equal and
make a fair price especially for the
● student who can’t afford to buy.
● Air condition canteen
● Both canteen no enough space
● The price in the big canteen should lower
their price
● Provide more tables and chairs
● It should be clean with proper sanitation, wear
mask, apron, gloves, hair net
● specially to the crew that serves the food
● Both canteen should put prices in their
product and also give the affordable price
● to satisfy their target customer.
● Provide more nutritious foods and lower the
price so that the student can afford
● to buy
