0% found this document useful (0 votes)
229 views6 pages

Importance of Endgame

1. The document discusses the importance of understanding endgames in chess, as winning positions in the middlegame can be lost without proper endgame knowledge. 2. Endgames require a different style of thinking than the middlegame, as tactics change when aiming to draw rather than win, and individual piece traits and square control become more important with fewer pieces. 3. Mastery of endgames involves understanding how each piece behaves along with the characteristics of each square on the board.

Uploaded by

satthak gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
229 views6 pages

Importance of Endgame

1. The document discusses the importance of understanding endgames in chess, as winning positions in the middlegame can be lost without proper endgame knowledge. 2. Endgames require a different style of thinking than the middlegame, as tactics change when aiming to draw rather than win, and individual piece traits and square control become more important with fewer pieces. 3. Mastery of endgames involves understanding how each piece behaves along with the characteristics of each square on the board.

Uploaded by

satthak gupta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Importance of –The End Game

\Chess Trng\CHESS-MAT\Mixed puzzles.docx – puzzle no 1.


1. Even a winning position till middle game needs proper end game knowledge
otherwise a win may turn into a draw/loss or a draw may turn into a loss. Also with
proper knowledge of end game you may draw a losing game or win a game which
may otherwise a losing or drawish game.
2. End game is more demanding than middle game
a. All the middle game tactics can be applied in the end game
b. When game is not in your favour then your thinking style has to change
completely.
i. You may want to draw by perpetual check – needed different thinking
ii. You may want to draw by stalemate -– needed different thinking
iii. You may want to draw by material inefficiency - needed different
thinking.
c. For above your strength of position might become weaknesses when change
your aim from win to draw.
3. End game requires a very detailed understanding each and every pieces, their
behaviour and traits –
a. how individual piece get trapped.
b. mischievous manuvering of knight.
c. How to deal with knight i.e. keeping King or Rook at a gap of 1 diagonal
d. Keeping bishop and queen 2 squares away in the same line as of knight.
e. How Rook or King can trap a cornered knight
f. Inability of a bishop to attack on pieces sitting in other colour squares.
g. Why knight’s moves are different to comprehend.
h.
4. And also of each and every square.
5. Additionally endgame requires analysis with active involvement of king.
6. Since there are very less number of pieces on the board. End game is the best way to
start getting into detailed thinking.
Endgames Tips and Rules
The endgame is the stage of the chess game when few pieces are left on the chess
board. Theoretical endgames are positions where the correct line of play is
generally known and well-analyzed, so the solution is a matter of technique.
Practical endgames are positions arising in actual games, where skillful play
should transform it into a theoretical endgame position.

Here are some endgame tips and rules.

Trade pieces, not pawns, when ahead in material.


Material advantage wins in endgames. Hold on to your material.
Try to gain tempi whenever possible – but without giving up material.
In the endgame, take your time to calculate more often and deeper than before.
Endgames requires more knowledge of specific positions and patterns.
Get your king close to the action and in front of your pawns is possible. Endgames
favor an aggressive king.
Cut the enemy king off from the action when you can.
It is usually a good idea to trade down into a pawn up endgame.
As pawns advance, they get more difficult to protect. Try to keep pawns
connected.
The fewer the pieces, the more important are pawns.
Advance your good pawns to increase your chances of creating a passed pawn (a
passed pawn is one which does not have an opposing pawn on its file or adjacent
files on its way to promotion on the 8th rank).
If you have an advantage, try to leave pawns on both sides of the board. Endings
with pawns on both sides of the board are much easier to win.
In king and pawn endings, it is vital to understand opposition and distant
opposition. When two kings are in opposition, they are on the same rank or file,
with an empty square separating them. The player having the move loses the
opposition.
Have a flexible and sound pawn formation. Avoid doubled, isolated, and
blockaded pawns.
Passed pawns must be pushed.
The outside passed pawn is an advantage. In K+P endgames it is usually a decisive
advantage.
Connected passed pawns are usually best if pushed together.
Connected passed pawns on the 6th rank beat a rook. If two connected passed
pawns reach their sixth rank, they are generally as powerful as a rook.
Wing pawns are often more valuable then center pawns as they are easier to queen.
With rook pawns, the bishop must be of the same color as the queening square.
Rook pawns with the bishop not covering the queening square draws.
In endgames with pieces and pawns, an extra pawn is a winning advantage in 50-
60% of the cases.
In king and pawn endings, an extra pawn is decisive in more than 90% of the
cases.
When all of the pawns are on the same side of the board, the stronger side should
try to exchange pawns to try to create a passed pawn.
It is usually better for the player with more pawns to avoid too many pawn
exchanges, because winning chances are reduced if too few pawns remain.
A knight works better with a bishop than another knight.
The knight is the best piece to block a passed pawn, followed by the bishop.
The knight is superior to the bishop in blocked positions or when the bishop is
hemmed in by pawns on the same color squares as the bishop.
Knights are short range pieces and are unable to stop pawns from afar.
Two knights cannot force checkmate against a lone king, but if the weaker side
also has a pawn, checkmate is sometimes possible.
A knight and pawn versus knight is generally a draw, since the lone knight can be
sacrificed for the pawn.
A knight and pawn versus bishop is a draw if the defending king is in front of the
pawn or sufficiently near. The bishop is kept on a diagonal that the pawn must
cross and the knight cannot both block the bishop and drive the defending king
away.
A knight can draw against three connected pawns if none are beyond the fourth
rank.
If you only have one bishop, put your pawns on its opposite color.
Bishops are worth more that knights except when they are pinned in.
If you have one bishop, put your pawns on the opposite color squares.
Two bishops, plus their king, can easily checkmate a lone enemy king, provided
that the bishops move on opposite color squares.
A bad bishop is one that is hemmed in by pawns of its own color, and has the
burden of defending them.
For bishop and pawn versus bishop of the same color, the game is a draw if the
defending king can reach any square in front of the pawn that is opposite in color
to the squares the bishop travel on.
For bishop and pawn versus bishop of the same color, if the defending king is
behind the pawn and the attacking king is near the pawn, the defender can draw
only if his king is attacking the pawn, he has the opposition, and his bishop can
move on two diagonals that each have at least two squares available (other than the
square it is on).
For bishop and pawn versus bishop of the same color, a knight pawn always wins
if the defending bishop only has one long diagonal available.
Bishops of opposite colors have the greatest chance of drawing. These endgames
are often drawn even when one side has a two-pawn advantage, since the weaker
side can create a blockade on the squares which his bishop operates on.
A pair of bishops is stronger than a pair of knights.
Bishops are better than knights in about 60% of the time in the endgame. The more
symmetrical the pawn structure, the better it is for the knight.
A bishop and a knight, plus their king, can checkmate a lone enemy king, although
the checkmate procedure may take up to 33 moves with correct play.
For bishop versus knight endings, with pawns, if the material is even, the position
should be drawn.
For bishop versus knight endings, with pawns, when most of the pawns are on the
same color as the bishop, the knight is better.
A bishop and pawn versus knight is a draw if the defending king is in front of the
pawn of sufficiently close. The defending king can occupy a square in front of the
pawn of the opposite color as the bishop and cannot be driven away.
Three connected pawns win against a bishop if they all get past the fourth rank.
Two bishops versus a knight wins for the bishops, but it takes up to 66 moves.
A minor piece (bishop or knight) versus one or two pawns is normally a draw,
unless the pawns are advanced.
Three pawns are often enough to win against a minor piece.
Put your rooks behind passed pawns, whether one’s own or the opponent’s (the
Tarrasch rule).
In an ending of a rook and pawn versus a rook, if the pawn is not too far advanced,
the best place for the opposing rook is in front of the pawn.
Study rook and pawn endgames. They are the most frequent endgames.
A rook on the 7th rank is worth a pawn.
When both sides have a pair of rooks, the player with more pawns has better
winning chances if the pair of rooks is not exchanged.
Rook and pawn endgames are often drawn, despite an extra pawn or two.
Rook and pawn endgames occur in about 10% of all games.
When both sides have two rooks and pawns, the stronger side usually has more
winning chances than if each had only one rook.
The rook and pawn versus rook is the most common of the “piece and pawn versus
pieces” endgames.
In rook and pawn versus rook, in general, if the weaker side’s king can get to the
queening square of the pawn, the game is a draw; otherwise it is a win.
In rook and pawn versus rook, if the attacking rook is two files from the pawn and
the defending king is cut off on the other side, the attacker normally wins.
A rook and pawn versus a minor piece is normally a win for the rook.
For a rook and pawn versus a minor piece ending, if the pawn is on the 6th rank
and is a bishop pawn or rook pawn, and the bishop does not control the pawn’s
promotion square, the position is a draw.
In a rook versus minor piece and three pawns ending, it is a win for the minor
piece side.
In a rook versus two minor pieces and a pawn ending, it is a win for the minor
piece side.
In rook versus pawn, it the rook’s king is not near, the game is drawn.
In rook versus two pawns, it the rook’s king is not near, the game is won by the
side with the pawns.
If the rook’s king is near, the rook wins over one or two pawns.
If the rook’s king is near, the rook draws against three pawns.
If the rook’s king is near, the rook loses to four or more pawns.
A rook and bishop versus rook should draw.
The queen and pawn versus queen endgame is the second most common of the
“piece and pawn versus piece” endgame.
A queen and knights are usually stronger that a queen and bishop.
A queen versus two rooks is normally drawn.
A queen versus a rook normally wins for the queen side.
A queen versus rook and minor piece is normally drawn.
A rook and bishop plus two pawns win over a queen.
A queen versus rook with two connected pawns is usually a draw.
In queen versus two bishops, the queen wins, but it could take up to 71 moves to
force a win.
A queen versus two knights is generally a draw.
Queen and bishop versus two rooks wins for the queen and bishop side, but it takes
up to 84 moves

You might also like