Stunting Mesir PDF
Stunting Mesir PDF
ISSN 2309-8902
© IDOSI Publications, 2013
DOI: 10.5829/idosi.ajn.2013.2.1.7466
                    1
                        Institute of African Research and Studies, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
                                     2
                                       National Nutrition Institute (NNI), Cairo, Egypt
    Abstract: Growth retardation is highly prevalent among children in low-income countries. Infections and
    inadequate food intake are well-established causes of growth retardation; however, the possible specific role
    of micronutrient deficiencies in the etiology of growth retardation and other developmental and health
    outcomes has gained attention recently. The aim of the present study was to provide information about
    nutritional status of stunted Egyptian preschool children and their dietary intake, which will help in designing
    a proper nutrition education massages &appropriate preventive strategies to improve linear growth. The study
    was designed as a case control study included (100) Egyptian children aged 2-<6 years old, with delayed linear
    growth, proportionate stunted, randomly selected from the stunted outpatient clinic of National Nutrition
    Institute (NNI) and results were compared to (50) age, sex and socioeconomic matching control. All participants
    were subjected to the baseline assessment (Full history- clinical examination- anthropometric measurements
    including weight & height- lab investigation including hemoglobin concentration, serum Ca, Zn, Vit. A, TSH,
    T4,T3 & albumin and stool analysis - dietary intake including“ Twenty four-hour recall“ method & food
    frequency questionnaire. Results showed that mean height for age Z score is significantly lower among the
    stunted compared to the control group. Dietary intake analysis showed that mean intake of all minerals is
    significantly lower among stunted children as compared to control group.% intake of RDA from Ca was 57.2%
    for stunted as compared to 101.7% for control. Nearly the same pattern was noticed for Mg.while intake of all
    macronutrients was significantly lower among stunted compared to the control group. Vitamin A intake of
    stunted group represented only 67.5% of RDA as compared to 214.0% of control group; the difference was
    highly significant between the two groups. All blood values of Albumin,TSH,T3,T4,Ca, Zn& Vit.A were
    significantly lower among stunted group as compared to control, although within normal range, according to
    cut off point of each parameter, while both groups were anaemic with no significant differences between the
    two groups. As a conclusion, It seemed that dietary intake deficiency of several micronutrients of stunted
    children (primarily Ca, Zn, Mg and vitamin A) & all macronutrients intake may play an important role in their
    linear growth retardation. Calcium intake level among stunted children was far below the recommended figures.
    Nutrition education messages encouraging high consumption of dairy products are needed to counteract this
    pattern of low calcium intake. Preventive strategies to prevent stunting and promote healthy eating & milk
    consumption are recommended.
Key words: Stunted growth Body mass index (BMI) Nutritional status
nadequate intake of dietary energy and protein and                against the wall of the stunting clinic and was measured
frequent infections are well-known causes of growth               to the nearest 0.1 cm. Z score was calculated for height for
retardation [4-6]. However, the role of specific                  age using the computer program ANTHRO [version 1.01
micronutrient deficiencies in the etiology of growth              1990].
retardation has gained attention more recently [7-9].
Micronutrient deficiencies are highly prevalent in                Laboratory Investigations: Blood samples Collected from
low-income countries and the most probable causes                 fasting children between (9 and 10 a. m). Serum was
are low content in the diet and poor bioavailability.             rapidly separated by centrifugation (3000 rpm 10 min).
More than half of preschool children are anemic and               Separated serum aliquots were removed and stored frozen
an estimated 75 million and 140 million preschool                 at -70°C until analysis was done which included:
children have clinical and subclinical vitamin A
deficiencies, respectively [10]. Less information is              *Serum Zn, Cut off point 60-110 µg/dl [14].
available on the prevalence of zinc deficiency, although          *Serum Calcium: By Colorimetric determination using the
it has been estimated recently that about half of the             kits from BioMerieux France. Cut off point 10-12 mg/dl
world's population is at risk of inadequate intake of             [15].
absorbable zinc [11].                                             * Serum TSH,T3,and T4: By using BIOSOURCE h-OST
     Therefore, the aim of the present study was to               ELIZA kit manufactured by BioSource Europe S.A. Rue de
provide information about the nutritional status of               I'Industrie, 8 B-1400 Nivelles Belgium. Cut off point of
stunted Egyptian preschool children and their dietary             TSH= 0.4-7µlu/ml [16], Cut off point of T 3= 1.2-4.2 pg/ml
intake, which will help in designing a proper nutrition           [17] Cut off point of T4= 7-22 pg/ml [18].
education massages and appropriate preventive strategies          *Serum vit. A: Cut off point < 36-120 µg/dl [19].
to improve linear growth.                                         *Serum Albumin levels; Cut off point 3.8-5.1g/dl [20].
                                                                  *Hb concentration: Cut off point 11-14gm/dl [21].
          MARTERIALS AND METHODS                                  Stool analysis.
     Case control study that included (100) stunted               Food Intake: Using 24-hour dietary recall and food
preschool children aged (2--<5years) attending the                frequency methods.
stunting outpatient      clinic of National Nutrition
Institute (NNI), Cairo during the period 6/2011 to 9/2011.        24-Hour Dietary Recall: Data were recorded as grams
All children were clinically free with no complaint               consumed, the conversion of household measures to
apart from short stature. Fifty (50) matching children            grams was achieved through use of prepared list of
(with normal height for age) were included as a control           weight of commonly used household measures in Egypt
group. After taking verbal consent from the parents, each         developed by National Nutrition Institute. The energy and
of the studied cases as well as the controls was subjected        main nutrients content of the 24 hour food intake was
to the following procedures:                                      computed through the food composition tables of the
                                                                  NNI, 1993 [22]. The vitamin and mineral contents of food
Clinical History: It included socioeconomic status which          and beverages consumed were compared to the
was done according to El-Sherbeny and Fahmy [12], past            recommended nutrient intake based on the report of joint
history of breast feeding, family history of similar              FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on human vitamin and
condition among siblings, previous diseases or                    mineral requirements, 2002 [23]. RDA of iron was based on
operations, fractures, history of drug intake including           its bioavailability according to the daily diet content of
inhaled or topical preparation; Parental heights and family       hem iron source in gm : Low bioavailability < 30 gm of
history were reported;                                            hem iron source, Intermediate 30-90 gm of hem iron source
                                                                  and High bioavailability > 90 gm of hem iron source.
Thorough Clinical Examination: For clinical evaluation of
nutritional status was conducted by the medical doctor of         Food Frequency Method: This method was used to obtain
the clinic; Anthropometric measurements were assessed             qualitative descriptive information about usual food and
according to the standard procedure [13]. Weight was              consumption pattern for the children grope of food,
measured using Platform Bath Scale. Height was measured           including items about : Energy foods as : Cereals and its
using a Raven millimeter which is permanently fixed               products, fats, tubers and sweets.
                                                              2
                                                               Acad. J. Nutr., 2 (1): 01-09, 2013
    Tissue building foods as: Meat, chicken, fish, eggs,                                         The results also indicated that 92.7% of stunted boys
legumes, milk and its produces. Protective foods as:                                        & 92% of stunted girls showed delayed bone age
Vegetables and fruits.                                                                      determined by X ray.
                                                                                                 Table (2) showed that the mean height of the stunted
Data Analysis: Data were analyzed in the data                                               boys & girls was (91±8.2 &90.05±7.3 cm) compared to
management and statistical unit of NNI using SPSS                                           (98.7±7.13 &101.68±9.4 cm) for the control group with
(version 5.0.1 Inc Chicago). Data for all variables were                                    highly significant difference between the two groups
presented as means with their standard deviations;                                          (p=0.000). To assess the nutritional status of children,
Comparison of means was made using unpaired student's                                       Height/Age (Z score was used) WHO 2006 [24].
t-test. P values of (<0.05) were considered significant.                                         Mean height for age Z score among the studied
                                                                                            stunted males and females children was (-1.76±1.77
                              RESULTS                                                       and-1.71± 1.81). While mean height for age among the
                                                                                            studied control children was (-0.67±0.98 and -0.2±o.96)
     The total number of enrolled children was (150), 100                                   respectively.
(51% males & 49% females) stunted cases compared to                                              The mean intake of all minerals was significantly
50 (58% males & 42% females) children as controls.                                          lower among stunted children as compared to control
Mean ages of the stunted and the control groups were                                        group.% intake of RDA from Ca was 57.2% for stunted as
(50.37±15.24 & 47.8±1.79) respectively.                                                     compared to 101.7% for control. Nearly the same pattern
     Table (1) showed the socioeconomic characteristic                                      was noticed for Mg. Otherwise % intake of RDA from
among the studied children. Low social status was                                           other minerals exceeded 100% among both groups except
representing only 17 and 6% of stunted and control                                          for Zn & Selenium which were 94.15 & 94.3% respectively
children respectively. As regard history of breast feeding,                                 among the stunted group only (Table 3).
only 4 and 2% of stunted and control children                                                    As regard vitamins intake, Table (4) showed that all
respectively were not breast fed at all with significant                                    mean values of vitamins intake were significantly lower
difference between the two groups (p= 0.015).                                               among stunted group as compared to control. Most of %
Table 1: Percentage distribution of socio economic characteristics among the studied children
                                 Case N=100                                                                Control N=50
                                 --------------------------------------------------------------------      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 Mother                                    Father                          Mother                                   Father
Socio economic                   --------------------------                --------------------------      ------------------------                 ----------------------------
characteristics                  No.                 (%)                   No.                  (%)        No.                 (%)                  No.                  (%)
Education :-
Illiterate                       6                   (6%)                 7                    7%          2                  4%                    0                   0%
literate                         13                  13%                  8                    8%          3                  6%                    4                   8%
Preparatory                      18                  18%                  14                   14%         5                  10%                   1                   2%
Secondary                        36                  36%                  44                   44%         19                 38%                   24                  48%
Vocational education             7                   7%                   7                    7%          3                  6%                    4                   8%
University                       19                  19%                  20                   20%         18                 36%                   17                  34%
Post graduate                    1                   1%                   0                    0%          0                  0%                    0                   0%
Occupation:-
No Occupation                    87                  87%                  1                    1%          40                 80%                   0                   0%
Unskilled worker                 0                   0%                   37                   37%         1                  2%                    12                  24%
Skilled worker                   0                   0%                   12                   12%         0                  0%                    6                   12%
Semi profession                  12                  12%                  36                   36%         8                  16%                   23                  46%
Profession                       1                   1%                   14                   14%         1                  2%                    9                   18%
Money spent for food:-
< 50%                            42                                       42%                              7                                        14%
50 % <75%                        56                                       56%                              40                                       80%
 >75%                            2                                        2%                               3                                        6%
*Social Status:-
Low                              17                                       17%                              3                                        6%
Middle                           67                                       67%                              35                                       70%
High                             16                                       16%                              12                                       24%
                                                                                        3
                                                         Acad. J. Nutr., 2 (1): 01-09, 2013
Table 3: Mean and % intake of minerals in relation to RDA of the studied children
                                                       Case                                       Control
                                                       ----------------                           ---------------
Variables                                              mean± SD                                   mean± SD                    P
Mean Calcium (mg) intake                               314.6±145.3                                559.10±256                  0.000***
RDA for Ca.(mg/d)                                      500-600
%intake from RDA                                       57.2                                       101.7
Mean Total Iron (mg) intake                            9.08±3.6                                   7.87±3.28                   0.04*
RDA for Iron (mg/d)                                    6
%intake from RDA                                       131.2                                      121.3
Mean Total Zinc (mg) intake                            4.71±1.74                                  5.94±2.62                   0.001**
RDA for zinc(mg/d)                                     4.1-5.1
%intake from RDA                                       94.15                                      118.72
Mean Copper (mcg) intake                               535.7±227.7                                611.5±276.3                 0.08(NS)
RDA for Cu. (mcg/d)                                    340-440
%intake from RDA                                       137.4                                      156.8
Mean Selenium (mcg) intake                             23.57±7.9                                  30.5±13.2                   0.000***
RDA for Se.(mcg/d)                                     20-30
%intake from RDA                                       94.3                                       121.9
Mean Iodine (µg) intake                                114.82±44.51                               168.37±93.75                0.000***
RDA for Iodine (µg/d)                                  75-110
%intake from RDA                                       127.58                                     187.08
Mean Phosphorus (mg) intake                            489.3±147.2                                659.6±233.8                 0.000***
RDA for P. (mg/d)                                      460-500
%intake from RDA                                       102                                        137.4
Mean Magnesium (mg) intake                             58.9±20.4                                  102.3±36.7                  0.000***
Table 4: Mean and percentage of some vitamins intake in relation to RDA of the studied children
                                                           Case                                      Control
                                                           ---------------                           ---------------
Variables                                                  mean± SD                                  mean± SD                 P
Mean Thiamine (mg) intake                                  0.61±0.25                                 0.66(±0.25               0.27(NS)
RDA for Thiamine (mg/day)                                  0.5-0.6
%intake from RDA                                           111.7                                     120.4
Mean Riboflavin (mg)intake                                 1.1±0.79                                  1.5±0.8                  0.009**
RDA for Riboflavin(mg/day)                                 0.5-0.6
%intake from RDA                                           201.5                                     267
Mean Niacin (mg)intake                                     6.8±2.8                                   9.0±4.1                  0.000***
RDA for Niacin (mg/day)                                    6-8
%intake from RDA                                           97                                        129
Mean Vitamin C (mg) intake                                 59±67.9                                   91.3±87.5                0.04*
RDA for Vitamin C (mg/day)                                 30
%intake from RDA                                           196.8                                     291.5
Mean Vitamin A (µg) intake                                 286.8± 129.9                              913.48± 718.9            0.000***
RDA for Vitamin A (µg/d)                                   400-450
%intake from RDA                                           67.5                                       214.0
Source : RDA for Ca, Mg, Zn, FeIodine and Vitamins) [23]
RDA for Cu, P, Se, Carbohydrates and fat )[25]
                                                                             4
                                                                     Acad. J. Nutr., 2 (1): 01-09, 2013
Table 5: Mean and percentage of macronutrients intake in relation to RDA of the children studied sample
                                                            Case                                     Control
                                                            -------------------                      ------------------
Variables                                                   mean± SD                                 mean± SD                                                       P
Mean Energy (Kcal) intake                                   927.35±276.5)                            1265.4±332.8                                                   0.000***
RDA for Energy (Kcal/d)                                     1047-1467
% intake from RDA                                           74.19                                    101.2
Mean Total protein (g) intake                               36.03±10.83                              47.01±16.51                                                    0.000***
RDA for protein (g/day)                                     13- 37
% intake from RDA                                           96.09                                    125.37
Mean Total fat (g) intake                                   25.04±10.43                              38.09±18.84                                                    0.000***
RDA for fat (g/day)                                         30
% intake from RDA                                           83.48                                    126.97
Mean Carbohydrates (g) intake                               114.0±11.3                               144.38±54.75                                                   0.000***
RDA for Carbohydrates (g/d)                                 130
% intake from RDA                                           87.7                                     111.1
Source: RDA for energy( FAO/WHO/ UNU)[26]
RDA for protein (Anderson [27]
Table 6: Mean (±SD) of some Lab parameters among the studied children
                                                                                                           Case                                  Control
                                                                                                           ----------------                      ----------------
Age                Parameters                     Cut Of Point                                             mean±SD                               mean±SD            *P
2 <6               Hb                             11 14g/dl                                                9.90±0.82                             10.24±0.61         0.101(NS)
                   Albumin                        3.8 5.1g/dl                                              4.27±.0.43                            5±0.32             0.0002 ***
                   TSH                            0.4 7µlu/ml                                              2.36±0.77                             2.79±0.64          0.003**
                   T3                             1.2 4.2pg/ml                                             3.03±1.01                             4.07±1.39          0.0003***
                   T4                             7 22pg/ml                                                4.17±1.89                             5.22±1.14          0.0003***
                   Ca.                            10 12mg/dl                                               8.49±1.84                             9.66±1.26          0.0008**
                   Zn                             60 110µg/dl                                              94.11±32.77                           140.83±58.17       0.0009**
                   Vit. A                         36 120µg/dl                                              43.71±17.99                           63.45±11.94        0.003**
intake of RDA from vitamins among both groups                                                                      For Lab       parameters,    all    blood values of
exceeded 100% except for vitamin A intake of stunted                                                           albumin, TSH, T3, T4, Ca, Zn & Vit. A were
group which represented only 67.5% of RDA as compared                                                          significantly lower among            stunted group as
to 214.0% of control group; the difference was highly                                                          compared to control, although within normal
significant between the two groups.                                                                            range, according        to    cut off point of each
     Table (5) showed that, there is a significant decrease                                                    parameter, while both groups were anaemic with
in mean intake of macronutrients among stunted group as                                                        no significant differences between the two groups
compared to control and their % intake of RDA from                                                             (Table 6).
energy(Kcal/day), protein(g/day), fat(g/day) & CHO                                                                 Stool analysis also indicated parasitic infestation &
(g/d)were less than100%(74.1, 96.09,83.48 & 87.7%)                                                             presence of indigestive food in nearly half of the children
respectively.                                                                                                  from both groups.
                                                           Cases
                                           160                                                                                           140.9
                                                           Control
                                           140
                                           120
                                                    95.7 99.4
                             Mean Values
                                                                                                                          87.9
                                           100
                                                                                                                                  70                        65.4
                                            80                                                                     61.6
                                                                              51.5
                                            60                         41.5                                                                         40.2
                                            40
                                                                                                     7.1   7.8
                                            20
                                             0
                                                                                     FATS AND OILS
                                                                                                                                                   FRUITS
                                                 CEREALS
                                                                                                                                 MILKS
                                                                     SUGARS
MEATS
Fig. 1: Mean food frequency pattern from different types of food among the studied children
                                                                                                           5
                                                                     Acad. J. Nutr., 2 (1): 01-09, 2013
                                                           Cases
                                      120
                                                           Control                                     99.3            99.4
                                                                                                               95.7
                                      100
                                                                                              70.9
                                      80
                        Mean Values
                                                    54.6      56.5
                                      60
                                      40
                                                                         18.2
                                      20                                         10.4
                                                                                                                              1.65   1.9
                                                                                                                              NUTS
                                            VEGETABLES
LEGUMES
BEVERAGES
                                                                                                              TUBERS
Fig. 2: Mean food frequency pattern from different types of food among the studied children
                                                                                           6
                                              Acad. J. Nutr., 2 (1): 01-09, 2013
                                                               7
                                            Acad. J. Nutr., 2 (1): 01-09, 2013
12. El-Sherbeny, A.F. and S.I. Fahmy, 1985. Deterning            29. EDHS (Egypt Demographic and Health Survey).
    simple parameter for social classification for health            Cairo. Egypt, 2005. Ministry of Health and
    research, The Bulletin of high institute of Public               Population, National Population Council, 11: 9.
    Health, X11: 95-107.                                         30. World Health Organization, 1995. Physical status: the
13. WHO, 1983. Measuring changes in nutritional status.              use and interpretationof anthropometry. WHO
    Guidelines for assessing the nutritional impact of               technical report series no. 854. Geneva.
    supplementary feeding programs for vulnerable                31. Benefine, E., D. Garnier, I. Verreschi, K. Tucker and
    groups. Geneva.                                                  S. Robert, 2001. Relationship between Stunting in
14. Johsen and R. Eliasson, 1987. Determination of zinc              Infancy and Growth and Fat Distribution During
    in serum, plasma or urine, Intern. J. Andrology,                 Adolescence in Senegalese Girls. European Journal
    10: 435-440.                                                     of Clinical Nutrition, 55: 50-58.
15. Kaplan, L.A. and A. Pesce, 1996. Measurement of              32. Ramakrishna, U., P. Nguyen and R. Martorell, 2009.
    calcium in serum, plasma or urine, J. Clinical                   Effects of micronutrientson growth of children under
    Chemistry, Mosby Ed.                                             5 y of age: meta-analyses of single andmultiple
16. Fisher, D.A., 1996. Physiological variation in thyroid           nutrient interventions. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 89: 191-203.
    hormones. Physiological and pathophysiological               33. Rivera, J.A., C. Hotz, T. Gonzalez-Cossio, L. Neufeld
    considerations. Clin Chem, 42: 135-139.                          and A. Garcia-Guerra, 2003. The effect of
17. Wild, D., 1994. Immunoassay Handbook, Stockton                   micronutrient deficiencies on child growth: A review
    Press, pp: 339.                                                  of results from community-based supplementation
18. McComb, R.B., G.N. Bowers and S. Posen, 1979.                    trials. Journal of Nutrition, 133(11): 4010S-4020S.
    Alkaline Phosphatase. 1st, Chap, 9: 525-704, Plenum          34. Dorup, I. and T. Clausen, 1991. Effects of magnesium
    Press, New York.                                                 and zinc deficiencies on growth and protein
19. Bieri, J.G., T.J. Tolliver and G.L. Catiganu, 1979.              synthesis in skeletal muscle and the heart. British
    Simultaneous determination of a - tocopherol and                 Journal of Nutrition, 66(3): 493-504.
    retinol in plasma or red cell by high pressure liquid        35. Nishi, Y., 1996. Zinc and growth. Journal of the
    chromatography. AM. J. Clin. Nutr., 32: 2143.                    American College of Nutrition, 15(4): 340-344.
20. Dumas, B.T. and H.G. Biggs, 1972. IN Standard                36. Clausen, T. and I. Dorup, 1998. Micronutrients,
    Methods of Clinical Chemistry Vol 7. Academic Press,             minerals and growth control Bibliotheca Nutritio et
    New York, pp: 175.                                               Dieta, 54: 84-92.
21. Drabkin, 1949. The standardization of hemoglobin             37. Bunce, G.E., 1994. Interactions between zinc, vitamins
    measurement. Am. J. Med. Sci., pp: 21-710.                       A and D and hormones in the regulation of growth.
22. National Nutrition Institute for Egypt NNI, 1993.                Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology,
    Food composition table based on local food analysis              352: 257-264.
    and food composition table in the middle east.               38. Black, R.E., 2003. Zinc deficiency, infectious disease
23. FAO/WHO, 2002. Human vitamins and minerals                       and mortality in the developingworld. Journal of
    requirement report of joint FAO/WHO expert                       Nutrition, 133 (5) (Supplement 1): 1485S-1489S.
    consultation, Bankok, Thailand.                              39. Black, R.E. and S. Sazawal, 2001. Zinc and childhood
24. WHO, Assessment of Nutritional Status, 2006.                     infectious disease morbidity and mortality. British
25. Mahan, L. Kathleen and Sylvia Escott-Stump, 2008.                Journal of Nutrition, 85(Supplement 2): S125-S129.
    Krause's Food & Nutrition Therapy.Ch, 7: 227.                40. Black, R.E., 1998. Therapeutic and preventive effects
26. FAO/WHO/UNU, 2004. Human energy requirements                     of zinc on serious childhood infectious diseases in
    report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert                             developing countries. American Journal of Clinical
    Consultation.                                                    Nutrition, 68(Supplement 2): 476S-479S.
27. Anderson, 2004. Nutrition and Bone Health in Food            41. Clausen, T. and I. Dorup, 1998. Micronutrients,
    and Nutrition Therapy 11th edition by L. Kathleen                minerals and growth control. Bibliotheca Nutritio et
    Mahan and Sylvia Escott-stump (ed). Chap,                        Dieta, 54: 84-92.
    27: 642-666.                                                 42. Lawless, J.W., M.C. Latham, L.S. Stephenson,
28. El-Zanaty Fatma and Ann Way EDH,S 2009. Egypt                    S.N. Kinoti and A.M. Pertet, 1994. Iron
    Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Cairo, Egypt:                supplementation improves appetite and growth in
    Ministry of Health, El-Zanaty and Associates and                 anemic Kenyan primary school children. Journal of
    Macro International. Chap,14: 183-188.                           Nutrition, 12: 645-654.
                                                             8
                                             Acad. J. Nutr., 2 (1): 01-09, 2013
43. Bronner, E., 1994. Calcium and Osteoporosis. Am.              46. Melton, L.J., 1994. Bone mineral measurement and
    J. Clin Nutr., 60: 831-836.                                       biochemical markers of bone cell function. In: Lorrain
44. Jones, D. and S. Kubow, 1999. Lipid, sterols and their            J, ed. Comprehensive management of menopause.
    metabolism. In: Krause’s Food, Nutrition and Diet                 New York: Springer, pp: 97-109.
    Therapy, Mahan K & Escott-Stump S (eds); 10th                 47. Foundation for osteoporosis research and education
    edition, Saunders company, Chapter, (4): 67-97.                   (1998): Osteoporosis, Guidelines of care for the
45. Higashi, Y., A. Takenaka, S. Takashashi and                       primary care physician. Oakland, Calif, pp: 11.
    T. Noguchi, 1998. Effect of protein restriction on
    messenger RNA of insulin like growth factor binding
    protein of overiectomized rats. Brit J. Nutr., 79: 447.