Department of Mechanical
Engineering
Progress Presentation# 01
“Development of Sliding Wear Test Setup”
Project Team Members
Nasir Habib ME151005
Muhammad Usman Rafique ME151029
Usama Tariq ME151030
Muhammad Asim Naeem ME151052
Abdul Haleem Khuram ME151054
Supervisor
Engr. Muhammad Ahmad 1
Problem Formulation
Objective
Outline Methodology
Progress/Readings/Measurement
Remaining Work
2
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Developing of Sliding Wear Test Rig to Meet the Need
of Lab Apparatus at Low Cost and Locally Available
Materials
To increase the reliability of parts in friction and the
life cycle of tools
To Save the Energy Losses due to wear
3
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Objective
Development of Sliding Wear Test Rig
Wear Behavior of Different Materials (Aluminum,
Cast Iron, steel)
Anti-Wear Behavior of Different Lubricants
4
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Authors Findings Research Title
Tribology: friction and Wear of
I. Heching and P. Shipway Effect of Load on wear
Engineering Materials
Effect of Contact Area on Wear Engineering Tribology
B. Andrew , G. Stchowiak
Archard wear Equation (Book)
Lubrication Regimes
Boundary Lubrication and
S. Hironaka Stribeck Curve
lubricants
Hersey Number
5
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Authors Findings Research Title
Effects of Bio Diesel Blends on
Tribology & Corrosion Test
M. Gulzar et al. Lubricating oil Degradation and
Methodology
Piston Assembly Energy Losses
Chapter 08: Measurement of Wear
Caroline Richard Wear test Standards and Friction Resistance of Bulk and
Coted Materials
A Rig Test to Measure Friction and
Holding Devices wear of Heavy duty diesel Engines
John J. Truhan
Piston Ring and Liner Wear Test Piston rings and Cylinder Liner
using Realistic Lubricants
6
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
System Description
Connecting
Control Unit Ac Motor Crank
Rod
Ball/Pin
Sliding Plate Oil Bath Load Arm
Holder
Gauge
Load Hanger Fixed Plate Frame
Holder
6
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Solid Works Model Oil Sump Crank
Connecting
Load Arm
Rod
Ac Motor
Fixed Plate
Frame
8
9
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Test Methodology
Tribological Test
Required Machining of Specimen
Washing of Specimen(Ultra-sonic Bath)
Establish a Contact Between Specimens(Using Test Rig)
Continue Running for Specific Time
Find Wear(Using Weight Loss Method)
Compare the Results
10
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Test Methodology
Tribological Test
Dry Test
Without Using Lubricants
Lubricated Test
Using Following Lubricants
SN 10W-40
SN 5W-30
SF/CF 20W-50
M. Gulzar et al., “Effects of biodiesel blends on lubricating oil degradation and piston 11
assembly energy losses,” Energy, vol. 111, pp. 713–721, Sep. 2016.
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Corrosive Test
Conduct for checking the Corrosiveness nature of
different Lubricant oil
Abrading of specimen
Washing of Specimen
Measuring the Weight
Immersion of Specimen in Oil for specific Time
Washing and Measuring the Weight
8.76×109 𝑤
Corrosion Rate =
𝐷𝑡𝐴
M. Gulzar et al., “Effects of biodiesel blends on lubricating oil degradation and piston 12
assembly energy losses,” Energy, vol. 111, pp. 713–721, Sep. 2016.
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Theoretical Equation for Wear
Archard’s wear Equation
𝐾𝑊𝑠
𝑉=
𝐻
V=Total Volume of wear Debris produced
K=Dimensionless Constant
W=Total Normal load
s=Sliding Distance
H=Hardness of the Contact Surfaces
13
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Experimental Progress
Calculation of Total Sliding Distance
𝑠 = 2𝐿 × 𝑁 × 𝑇
s=Total Sliding Distance
L=Length of Stroke
N=RPM of Crank
T= Total Time
14
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Experimental Progress
Calculations
Total Sliding Distance
𝑠 = 2𝐿 × 𝑁 × 𝑇
175
𝑠 = 2 0.06 × 7200
60
𝑠 = 2520𝑚
Mass of Specimen = 26.1125 𝑔 = 0.0261125 𝑘𝑔
Volume of Specimen = 𝑉 = 8.46504 × 10−6 𝑚3
𝑚 𝑘𝑔
Density of Meterial = 𝜌 = = 3084.74
𝑉 𝑚3 15
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Experimental Progress
∆𝑤
𝜌
Specific Wear Rate =
𝑃×𝑠
∆𝑤 = Weight Loss during Test = 26.1125 𝑔 − 25.293
= 0.8195𝑔 = 8.195 × 10−4 𝑘𝑔
𝑘𝑔
𝜌 = Density of Material = 3084.74 3
𝑚
𝑃 = Applied Load During Test= 2𝑁 = 0.2𝐾𝑔
s = Total Sliding Distance = 2520𝑚
Alotaibi, J., Yousif, B., & Yusaf, T. (2014). Wear behaviour and mechanism of different metals sliding against stainless steel
counterface. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology, 228(6), 692– 16
704. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350650114527072
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Experimental Progress
Specific Wear Rate
8.195 × 10−4
𝑆. 𝑊. 𝑅 = 3084.74
0.2 × 2520
3
𝑚
= 5.27108 × 10−10
𝑘𝑔. 𝑚
𝑚𝑚3
= 0.5271
𝑘𝑔. 𝑚
17
Problem Progress Readings
Objective Methodology Remaining Work
Formulation Measurements
Next Plan Work
Two different Holders
Testing
ANSYS Work
MATLAB Work
18
Thanks…
Any Question?
19
