ATTITUDES, SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS, HEALTH STATUS AND ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE OF PANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM (4Ps)
             BENEFICIARIES IN SECONDARY SCHOOLS OF
                     PALAPAG NORTHERN SAMAR
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
    Northern    Samar    is   facing   extreme    poverty,   hunger,   high
population growth and malnutrition. Hence, 4Ps is considered the
government’s “anti-poverty centerpiece” or flagship anti-poverty
program. Cash incentives are distributed to poor households on
the condition that parents regularly bring their children to
preventive health check-ups and enroll them in school. Pregnant
beneficiaries are required to seek pre- and post-natal care and
should be attended by a health professional when giving birth.
However, issues emerged towards the proper use of cash grants;
for example, some parents/guardians spend the money in gambling
and other expenditures instead of complying on the condition. As
a result, only a little amount of money goes to the needs of the
beneficiaries. Budget for food becomes scarce which decreases
the mental alertness of the beneficiaries. Consistently empty
stomach can also affect their attitude in terms of decreased
self-confidence and poor social skills. They also cannot provide
the materials needed in their studies and eventually loss their
interest   in   school    which   in   turn      affects   their   academic
performance. In addition to that, their health status is also
affected as evidence shown in their nutritional status.
      Based on the 2015 first semester poverty incidence report
of the Philippines Statistics (PSA), Northern Samar ranks 6th in
the     poorest   provinces       in     the    Philippines.1          Northern      Samar
province    is    also    one    of    the    4Ps   beneficiaries.       The    goal   of
Pantawid    Pamilyang         Pilipino       Program     (4Ps)    is    to    help   poor
residents    to     improve      their       health,     nutrition      and    education
especially children from 0-18 years by providing cash grants
(social     assistance)         and    invest       in    human     capital       (social
development)2.
      Governments        in     many    developing        countries      adopted       the
conditional cash transfer (CCT) scheme at a prodigious rate to
alleviate short-term poverty and reduce the intergenerational
transmission of poverty3. The program grants low-income families
the opportunity to receive financial support, provided they keep
their    children    in       school   and     maintain     their      health     through
regular check-ups. The extensive body of literature shows that
such programs positively drive poor families to invest more in
1
 Faq.ph/the-10-poorest-provinces-in-the-philippines/
2 Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago, Explanatory Note. The Constitution,
Article 2, Section 9, 15th Congress of the Republic of the Philippines First
regular Session, Senates No. 92
3 The comprehensive list of CCT programs are summarized by Fieszben et al
(2009), Participation in Education through Innovative Scheme for the Excluded
Vulnerable, PESRP.
human     capital4.         This     approach       is      considered           both    as     an
alternative to more traditional social assistance programs and a
demand-side complement to the supply of health and education
services       (Rawlings       and    Rubio      2005).      Results        of    the     impact
evaluation conducted in different countries, including Brazil,
Cambodia,       El     Salvador,         Honduras,         Jamaica,       Malawi,        Mexico,
Nicaragua, Pakistan and Turkey indicate that, by large, CCTs
lead to immediate increases in school enrollment and attendance
(Rawlings       and    Rubio    2003).      In   the       Philippines,          the    Pantawid
Pamiltang Pilipino Program (4Ps), also referred to as Pantawid
Pamilya,       is     the   government’s         version       of     the    CCT        launched
sometime in 2007. The Philippine government employed the 4Ps as
a     poverty       reduction      and     social        development        strategy          that
provides conditional cash grants to extremely poor households so
that they can improve their health, nutrition and education,
particularly of their children aged 1-185.
       Indeed,        the   main     objective        of    the     4Ps     and    other       CCT
programs is to prevent intergenerational transference of poverty
and    break     the    infinite         cycle   of      poverty      by    providing          the
children the suitable educational and health assistance so as to
5 DSWD explains that this is a right-based and social development program of
the national government that aims to contribute to poverty reduction. This is
patterned after the CCT program of Latin American and African countries that
have some success in their poverty reduction and social development measures.
help them develop the facilities for a better future. Investing
in children’s human capital and ensuring that they grow into
educated and healthy adults, is the equivalent of teaching them
how to fish. Healthy, educated children ultimately have more
choices in life and are able to become productive members of
society (Bloom, 2008).
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
    This study tried to assess the attitude, health status and
academic performance of 4Ps beneficiaries in secondary schools
of Palapag, Northern Samar.
    Specifically it tried to:
  1. Determine the profile of:
       A. 4Ps beneficiaries in terms of:
            a. Sex
            b. Age
            c. Grade level
            d. Class section
            e. Number of children in the family
       B. Parent-respondent in terms of:
            a. Sex
            b. Age
          c. Highest educational attainment
          d. Main source of livelihood of the parents
          e. Monthly income of parents
2. Determine the attitude of secondary students in terms of
  the following areas:
  a. Learning
  b. Socialization
  c. Self perception
3. Determine the health status of secondary students in terms
  of:
  a. Body Mass Index (BMI)
  b. Incidence of infectious diseases
  c. Nutritional status
  d. Vaccinations
4. Determine the level of academic performance of secondary
  students.
5. Find out if there was a significant relationship between
  the profile of 4Ps beneficiaries and their attitudes.
6. Find out if there was a significant relationship between
  the profile of 4Ps beneficiaries and their health status.
7. Find out if there was a significant relationship between
  the   profile     of   4Ps   beneficiaries   and   their   academic
  performance.
  8. Find out if there was a significant relationship between
    the attitudes of 4Ps beneficiaries and their health status.
  9. Find out if there was a significant relationship between
    the   attitudes     of    4Ps   beneficiaries       and   their   academic
    performance.
  10.     Find   out    if    there   was   a   significant     relationship
    between the socio-economic status of 4Ps beneficiaries and
    their academic performance.
  11.     Find   out    if    there   was   a   significant     relationship
    between the health status of 4Ps beneficiaries and their
    academic performance.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY
    The   findings     of    this   study   will   be    beneficial    to   the
following:
    Students (4Ps Beneficiaries). Through this study, they may
be able to improve their attitude towards health and schooling
by encouraging their parents to prioritize their basic needs.
    Parents. Through this study they will realize that spending
the cash grants from the government in other expenses can have
drastic effects to the attitudes, health status and academic
performance of their children. Knowing this, they will be wise
enough to spend the cash grants to the needs of their children.
    Teachers.        Through       this     study,      teachers      will       be   more
knowledgeable in dealing with 4ps beneficiary students and also
develop    appropriate      strategies         that    will    suit      the     learning
abilities of the students.
    Guidance Counselor. This study will give opportunity to the
guidance counselor to met parents and inform them about the
attitude    and    performance        of    their     children      in    school.       The
guidance   counselor       could     give    them     advice   to     prioritize        the
basic needs of their children.
    School Nurse. Through this study, the school nurse will be
able to identify the 4ps beneficiaries that are undernourished
and will be able to collaborate with the school heads to include
these students in the school’s feeding program.
    Department of Education (DepEd). Through this study, the
Department    of    Education        (DepEd)    could     reinforce        the    feeding
program for the secondary students since their primary focus is
on the elementary pupils.
    They     would       also   be    able     to     collaborate        with    DSWD   in
formulating       more    efficient        monitoring     tools     to     assess       the
progress of the program with respect to its beneficiaries, both
in education and health.
    Department    of     Social   Welfare   and   Development    (DSWD).
Through this study, improvement of the program can be made. They
can be able to identify 4Ps beneficiaries that do not meet the
conditionalities of the program.
    Future Researchers. The study will serve as a reference for
future study.
    Local Government Units. Through this study the government
officials will know the real situation of the 4ps beneficiaries.
They can have strict implementation of the conditionalities of
the 4Ps beneficiaries.
SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
    The study endeavored to determine the profile of the 4Ps
beneficiaries,   their    attitudes,   health     status   and   academic
performance.
    The respondents that will be involved in this study will be
the 1818 junior high school student of Palapag District.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
    According to Abraham Maslow in his Maslow’s Hierarchy of
Needs, physiologic needs are the physical requirements for human
survival. If these requirements are not met, the human body
cannot function properly and will ultimately fail. Physiologic
needs are thought to be the most important; they should be met
first6.
         The cited theory of Abraham Maslow is considerably of great
importance to the present study because students who cannot met
their      basic     needs    (food,     clothing,            shelter)     will      not    be
interested in learning, self-care and health education.
         According      to   Daniel    Katz    in    his       Functionalist          Theory,
attitudes are determined by the functions they serve for us.
People hold given attitudes because these attitudes help them
achieve their basic goals7.
         Katz’s functionalist theory also offers an explanation as
to why attitudes change. According to Katz, an attitude changes
when it no longer serves its function and the individual feels
blocked      or    frustrated.    That      is,   according        to    Katz,       attitude
change       is    achieved     not    so     much       by     changing       a     person’s
information        or    perception      about      an    object,        but       rather   by
changing the person’s underlying motivational and personality
needs.
         The cited theory of Daniel Katz is of great importance to
the present study because it seeks to determine the attitudes of
4Ps beneficiaries in terms of learning, socialization and self-
6
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow’s_hierarchy_of_needs
7    https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc530/attitudes.html
perception. Specifically it seeks to determine whether there was
a change in attitude if students have a motivation in studying
which in this case the cash grants that they are receiving from
the DSWD’s Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps).
      In the 1980s, Andrew Tannahill created a health promotion
model   consisting          of    three     overlapping          spheres      of    activity:
health education, prevention, and health protection. He did so
in   response     to   a     shift     in    focus     within        the    literature   from
health education and prevention to health protection and health
promotion. Health education is designed to change the knowledge,
beliefs,   attitudes,            and   behavior        in   a    way       that   facilitates
health. Disease prevention aims to decrease risk factors and
minimize    the    consequences             of    disease;       it    includes      primary,
secondary, and tertiary prevention. Health protection focuses on
fiscal or legal controls and policies and voluntary codes of
practice   aimed       at    preventing          ill   health        and    enhancing    well-
being. Tannahill (2009) asserts that health protection includes
public policies that address fair access to housing, employment,
education and health care.8
      The cited theory of Tannahill is of great importance to the
present study because the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program
(4Ps)   includes       the       activity    mentioned          in    the    theory.    Health
8
 Tannahill, A. (2009). Health promotion: The Tannahill Model Revisited. Public
Health, 123 (5), 396-399.
protection sphere was represented by the conditionality that,
for a beneficiary to receive cash grants they should visit the
health   center   for      a   monthly        weight   monitoring    and     bi-annual
deworming. Pregnant and beneficiaries with new born babies are
also required to report to the health center for check-up and
vaccinations. Health prevention sphere was also represented by
vaccination and deworming activities. Health education sphere
was represented by the monthly Family Development Seminars (FDS)
conducted by the DSWD for the beneficiaries. In the said seminar
they are not only oriented on the proper spending of cash grants
but also on the importance of health promotion and prevention.
    According       to     Bandura       in    his     Social    Cognitive       Theory,
behavior
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
    This    study        seeks      to   determine      the     profile    of    parent
respondent in terms of sex, age, highest educational attainment,
main source of livelihood and monthly income. It also seeks to
determine the profile of 4Ps beneficiaries in terms of sex, age,
grade level, class section and number of children in the family.
The study also seeks to determine the attitude of 4Ps secondary
students   in     terms        of    learning,         socialization       and    self-
perception. It also seeks to determine the health status of 4Ps
secondary students in terms of Body Mass Index (BMI), incidence
of infectious disease, nutritional status and vaccinations. It
also    seeks    to   determine    the      academic       performance   of    4ps
beneficiary secondary students.
       This study also seeks to determine if the was a significant
relationship     between   the    profile    4Ps    beneficiaries     and     their
attitudes, health status and academic performance. It also seeks
to determine if there was a significant relationship between the
attitudes   of    4Ps   beneficiaries       and    their    health   status    and
academic performance. It also seeks to determine if there was a
significant      relationship     between     the    health     status   of    4Ps
beneficiaries and their academic performance.
Paradigm
Independent Variables                           Dependent Variable
                                                       Attitudes
 Profile of Parent-respondents                       1. Learning
                                                     2. Socialization
   1. Sex                                            3. Self-perception
   2. Age
   3. Highest educational
      attainment
   4. Main source of livelihood
   5. Monthly income                                 Health Status
                                                 1. Body Mass Index
                                                    (BMI)
 Profile of 4ps Beneficiaries
                                                 2. Incidence of
                                                    infectious diseases
      1. Sex                                     3. Nutritional status
                                                 4. Vaccination
      2. Age
      3. Grade level
      4. Class section
      5. Number of
       children in the family
                                                 Academic Performance
Figure I.       A paradigm Showing the Relationship Between the
            Profile,   Attitudes,   Socio-economic   Status,   Health
            Status and Academic Performance of 4Ps Beneficiaries
Hypotheses
          To reinforce the finding of this study, the following null
    hypotheses were tested:
      1. There is no significant relationship between the profile of
          4Ps beneficiaries and their attitudes.
      2. There is no significant relationship between the profile of
          4Ps beneficiaries and their health status.
      3. There is no significant relationship between the profile of
          4Ps beneficiaries and their academic performance.
      4. There is no significant relationship between the attitudes
          of 4Ps beneficiaries and their health status.
      5. There is no significant relationship between the attitudes
          of 4Ps beneficiaries and their academic performance.
      6. There      is   no    significant        relationship        between   the   health
          status of 4Ps beneficiaries and their academic performance.
Definition of Terms
          For better understanding of the study, the following terms
are defined conceptually and operationally:
          Age. Conceptually and operationally, this is the length of
existence extending from the beginning to any given time9.
9   Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
         Attitudes. Conceptually and operationally, it refers to a
feeling or way of thinking that affects a person’s behavior10.
         Body Mass Index (BMI). Conceptually and operationally, it
is   a    rough   measure   of   body   composition   that   is   useful   for
classifying the health risks of body weight11.
         Class section. Conceptually it refers to the classes formed
by dividing the students taking a course12. Operationally, it
refers to the class group in which the respondent belongs.
         Grade Level. Conceptually and operationally, it refers to
the level the student
         Health status. Conceptually and operationally, it refers to
the condition of being sound in body, mind or spirit13.
         Infectious   Diseases.    Conceptually    and   operationally,      it
refers to the diseases that are transmissible from one host
(person, animal, or other objects) to another14.
         Learning. Conceptually and operationally, it refers to the
activity or process of gaining knowledge or skills by studying,
practicing, being taught or experiencing something15.
10 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
11
   Physical Education and Health 10, Learner’s Material, First Edition 2015, p.
13.
12 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
13
   Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
14 Physical Education and Health 8, Learner’s Material, First edition 2013,
p.352.
      Level     of         Academic         Performance.       Conceptually       and
operationally, it refers to the excellence in academic courses16.
      Main    source      of   livelihood      of   parents.      Conceptually    and
operationally, it refers to the source of money that supports
the family.
      Monthly Income of Parents. This refers to the total amount
earned by the respondent’s family for the whole month.
      Nutritional         Status.     Conceptually     and     operationally,     it
refers to whether or not you are eating the correct amounts and
types of nutrients.
      Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps). Conceptually and
operationally,       it     refers     to    the    conditional     cash    transfer
program of the Philippine government under the Department of
Social Welfare and Development(DSWD)17.
      Self-perception. Conceptually and operationally, it refers
to the idea that you have about the kind of person you are18.
      Sex.    Conceptually       and    operationally,       it    refers    to   the
respondents who are either male or female.19
15 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
16 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
17 www.udyong.gov.ph/teachers-corner/7496-impacts-of-4p-s-in-education-
34664.com
18 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
19  The Webster Dictionary, p. 820.
      Socialization. Conceptually and operationally, it means to
participate actively in a social group20.
      Socio-economic status. Conceptually and operationally, it
refers to the position or rank of someone or something when
compared to others in a society21.
      Total number of children in the family. Conceptually and
operationally, it is the number of children that would be born
to a woman over her lifetime.
      Vaccines. Conceptually and operationally, it refers to the
preparations    that   are   usually    composed    of   dead   or   weakened
viruses that provide immunity by causing the body to produce
antibodies against the pathogen22.
20 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
21 Merriam-Webster Dictionary 2017, http://apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
22 Physical Education and Health 8, Learner’s Material, First edition 2013,
p.253.
                                          Chapter II
                                REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Attitude
    According           to   Brian        dela     Tore     in      his    study       Financing
Education    through         Pantawid           Pamilyang      Pilipino         Program      (4Ps)
respondents said it is very possible that the program improves
their   attitudes        towards      work,       health       and   schooling         of    their
children.    It    shows      that        improvement       of   recipients’           attitudes
towards    work,    health          and    schooling        is   one       of    the   programs
opportunities.
    According           to    the     respondents,          they       have      become      more
enthusiastic       in    finding          for    work     because         4Ps   provides       for
additional    income         and    because        they   are       members      of    the    Phil
Health, they can send to the hospital or health centers the
family members who are not feeling well. Also, the compulsory
deworming and vaccination of their children ease their minds on
their     children’s         wellness.          They    also     are      enthusiastic        and
encouraged    in    sending         their        children      to    school       knowing     the
government will help them with their financial obligations and
classroom requirements.
Health Status
      According       to    Brian       dela    Tore    in    his    study    Financing
Education    through        Pantawid      Pamilyang      Pilipino     Program       (4Ps),
pupils’     nutritional          status        (Percentage     of    Normal        pupils)
increased from 82.70% to 93.60% after the implementation of the
program.    As    anticipated,          4Ps     increased     the    health    services
consumption among the poor households as they have additional
income to pay for the health-related costs; and improve the
children’s       nutritional           status     through     increased       household
income,     provision       of    free     and     periodic     check-ups,         various
counseling and other monitoring components of 4Ps23. This is due
to   the    availability          of     food     allowance     because       of    their
membership       in   the    program      making       food   and    rice    easier    to
purchase. Also according to 4Ps recipient-respondents, they are
encouraged by the program’s Municipal Links to plant and own a
vegetable    plot     in     their      homes    to    make   sure    that    they     eat
nutritious foods24.
      According       to    Monica       Montilla,      et    al.    in   their     study
Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assistance to Pupils
Education, two of health conditionalities or benefits including
6-14 years old should receive deworming pills twice a year and
23  Reyes, C. & Tabuga, A. (2012). Conditional cash transfer program in the
Philippines: Is it reaching the extremely
poor?Available:http://dirp4.pids.gov.ph/ris/dps/pidsdps1242.pdf
24
   Dela Tore (2016), Financing Education through Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps), Vol 6. No.5, May 2016
should have weight monitoring25. Study shows that pupils are very
satisfactorily receiving deworming pills with the weighted mean
of 4.02. As supported by 20th Century Hookworm Eradication, 2007
found treatments to increase enrollment, attendance, literacy
and adult incomes, and based on Randomized Trial in Kenya, 2000,
found   that    school-based      deworming   reduces    school   absenteeism
with    25%.    Findings   also    revealed   a   weighted     mean    of   4.37
responded that they are excellently satisfied in terms in weight
monitoring. As cited by Conchada & Tiongco, 2014 that health
check-ups and visiting the health center have increased because
of Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program. Consequently, findings
show that very satisfactorily they are benefited by 4Ps in terms
of health with an average weighted mean of 4.1926.
       Moreover, Montilla et al. also cited that findings revealed
from pupils’ responses that they eat their meals three (3) times
a day with a weighted mean of 4.84, considered as a help of
financial support given by the 4P’s to buy their daily food.
From    the    financial   support   Php   500/month27    as   well,    that     a
weighted mean of 4.63 (excellent), pupils responded that their
25  Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) DSWD, (2006) National Sector
Support for Social Welfare and Development Reform Project (NSS-SWDRP) from
Site resources.worldbank.org/ INTPHILIPPINES/Resources/4PsDSWD
26
   Conchada, Mitzie Irene P. and Tiongco, Mariter (2014) Optimal Allocation of
School and Health Resources for Effective Delivery of the Conditional Cash
Transfer Program in Bagac, Bataan, DLSU Research Congress 2014. De La Salle,
University, Manila, Philippines
27
   Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) DSWD, (2006) National Sector
Support for Social Welfare and Development Reform Project (NSS-SWDRP) from
Site resources.worldbank.org/ INTPHILIPPINES/Resources/4PsDSWD
parents/guardian are able to give their daily school allowance
(“baon”). As supported by the findings of NFSMI, 2001 they found
out those school-age children who eat breakfast does better on
performance tests than with no breakfast. Same with the study
conducted by wherein around 72% of respondents answered that
they spend at least P200 on daily meals, and majority of them
said that their food budget only partly covers 3 meals per day,
based on this, the DSWD said the 4Ps program is “on track in
achieving its goal of empowering poor families including the
improvement     of   their    nutritional      status.”            However,   (National
Nutritional     Survey)      revealed      that        many    Filipinos      of    being
beneficiaries of government assistance programs or not- still
suffer from undernutrition. Accordingly, findings revealed that
pupils    are   excellently        benefited      by    4Ps    in     terms   of     their
nutrition with an average weighted mean of 4.7328.
Academic Performance
     According       to    Brian    dela    Tore        in    his    study    Financing
Education   through       Pantawid    Pamilyang         Pilipino      Program       (4Ps),
after the implementation of the program, the school’s average
daily    attendance       increased    from    82.60%         to    94.50%,       school’s
average   monthly     attendance      increased         from       81.20%    to    94.30%,
28Montilla et al.,Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assistance to
Pupil’s Education, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences,
Vol.2 No.3, July 2005
school’s monthly enrolment increased from 82.30% to 96.20% and
school’s yearly enrolment increased from 83.70% to 95.60%. This
could    be     a     noted     effect     of     the     educational       grant    and
conditionalities           of   the   Pantawid        Pamilyang    Pilipino       Program
(4Ps).   These       conditionalities          help    improve    the   enrolment     and
school attendance rates of children. Furthermore, according to
the respondents, attendance and enrolment of their children to
school    is        very    important     and         essential    on     their     being
beneficiaries of the 4Ps. It is a must and necessity as members
of the program. Since they are receiving the grants, they have
the capacity on sending their children to school and buying them
their supplies and needs. Children who are attending pre-school
and day care centers, elementary school and secondary must have
an attendance of not less than 85% of that month’s school days29.
& Conditionality plays a very essential role in CCT programs.
Conditionality needs to be included in the program because cash
transfer,      by    itself,     will    not    be     strong    enough   to   increase
school attendance significantly and sustainably30.
      The quality of education and schooling would have to be
enhanced when governing any cash transfer programs aimed at a
29
   Fernandez, L. & Olfindo, R. (2011). Overview of the Philippines' conditional
cash transfer program: The Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (Pantawid
Pamilya). Washington, DC: World Bank.
30
   Dela Tore (2016), Financing Education through Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps), Vol 6. No.5, May 2016
continual      reduction       of   poverty31.   The     conditionality     on    the
pupils’ attendance is the most visible and most felt benefit
derived     from      the    implementation      of    the   Pantawid    Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4Ps). According to teachers, there were lesser
absences of pupils because parents encouraged their pupils to be
always in school or else they might not meet the attendance
threshold per month. It has also been noted that because parents
were more informed and more careful in the health condition of
their children, lesser pupils became sick leading them to be
absent from their classes. Also, pupils’ academic performance
was noted to have improved because of their attendance in their
classes.
      After     the     implementation      also,      parents’   attendance      and
participation      in       classroom    meetings     increased   from   77.80%    to
95.00%, parents’ participation in school programs increased from
75.80%    to   91.40%,        parents’    participation      in   Brigada   Eskwela
increased from 80.90% to 96.70% and parents’ participation in
school projects increased from 78.50% to 92.80%. According to
the respondents, this is because they also wanted to be part of
the learning experiences of their children. As long as there is
no work in the farm and they have extra time, they will help and
attend in any volunteer work that the school needs. Attendance
31
  Son, H. & Florentino, J. (2008). Ex-ante impact evaluation of conditional
cash transfer program on school attendance and poverty: The case of the
Philippines. Mandaluyong City, Manila: Asian Development Bank.
during meetings and programs were found to be helpful in their
monitoring and nurturing of their children32.
       According to Montilla et al., 4Ps gives Php 300/month as
support for the education of pupils from 3-4 years, thus as a
condition, a child enrolled in elementary school must maintain
class attendance rate at least 85% per month33 and as expected by
schools    they     can    pay   their    contribution     and    provide   school
requirements        (projects,      school     supplies,    allowance,      etc.).
Findings show that pupils responded excellently that they are
able to attend classes everyday with the average rating of 4.37,
and motivated to go to school every day because of 4P’s. Study
also    reveals     that   pupils    of   D.R.C.E.S.   responded      excellently
with an average rating of 4.69 that their parents/guardian are
able to pay their school contributions and 4.74 weighted average
shows     a    excellently          response     of      pupils      that   their
parents/guardian are able to provide their school requirements
(projects, school supplies, allowance, etc.). With the support
of     Amico,1995     states,     traditionally       parent      involvement   in
education has included home-based activities (such as homework,
encouraging children to read, and promoting school attendance)
and school-based (such as attending PTA meetings, parent-teacher
32
   Dela Tore (2016), Financing Education through Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps), Vol 6. No.5, May 2016
33
   Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) DSWD, (2006) National Sector
Support for Social Welfare and Development Reform Project (NSS-SWDRP) from
Site resources.worldbank.org/ INTPHILIPPINES/Resources/4PsDSWD
conferences, concerts and other school events, helping to raise
money for various school-improvement projects, and voluntary at
school during the day)34. Thus, study shows that 4Ps beneficiary
pupils are excellently benefited by the program with an average
weighted mean of 4.5635.
       Moreover, according to Montilla et.al., findings revealed
that   out    of        11,   6    or     55%       said   that     their     pupils     with   4Ps
benefits are attending classes regularly and 3 or 27% said that
sometimes      attend          the       classes       and      sometimes      not.     Thus,    it
indicates that there is less absenteeism between the 4Ps pupils.
However, this finding is in contrast with (IPC) that whether
school    attendance              will    translate          into    academic      achievement,
completion         of    education          and      eventually      gain      full     employment
remains      blurry       because         of      lack     of     other      income     generating
opportunities, high cost of education and limited provision and
duration      of    4Ps       as   major        constraints,        their      children’s       full
acquisition         and       benefits         of    education.         On   the   other     hand,
results      showed       that       this    differences          may     occur    in    different
situations since teachers are mandated by DSWD , in Diogenes R.
Cabarles Elementary School to monitor the attendance of his/her
4Ps pupils and because education is free. As supported by a
34  Amico, Joe D’ (1995) Families and Schools Together Rural Audio Journal,Vol.
3, no. 3. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, 1995
35
   Montilla et al.,Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assistance to
Pupil’s Education, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences,
Vol.2 No.3, July 2015
study of Manasan,2011 that there is a significant improvement in
school attendance and is already evident in areas covered by the
program wherein he found out that the number of students in
public elementary schools grew from 0.6%36. In 2004-2007 the 4Ps
program is not yet implemented and raised to 3.7% in 2008-2010
when the program was already implemented37.
Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program
      In a study conducted by Dela Tore, he discusses the result
of the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)
Analysis of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) by the
program     recipient-respondents               through         a        researcher-made
questionnaire.       The       questionnaire       measures          the        degree    of
awareness of the respondents to the different facets of the
Pantawid    Pamilyang         Pilipino       Program     (4Ps).      A     highly     aware
response    means      that     the    respondents        are       totally      aware    of
strength, weakness, opportunity or threat of the program.
      The   result     of     the     SWOT    Analysis    provides         us    a   better
understanding of the program. It can be utilized as basis for a
better    and   more    effective        implementation         by    reinforcing        and
36
   Manasan, Rosario G., (2011)Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program and School
Attendance: Early Indications of Success. Philippine Institute for
Development Studies Retrieved February 9, 2015
37
   Montilla et al.,Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps): Assistance to
Pupil’s Education, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences,
Vol.2 No.3, July 2015
highlighting        the     program’s       strengths    and     opportunities     and
reducing or decreasing its weaknesses and threats.
      A carefully planned and properly implemented 4Ps may lead
to achievement of its goals, objectives and outcomes and may
help in improving the country’s quality of education both in
direct and indirect routes.
  Strengths of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps).
Strengths      of         the     program         are   the     internal    positive
characteristics that give it an advantage over others. Based on
initial interviews and related literature, the strengths of the
Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) was assessed in the
following areas; (1) awareness of objectives, (2) awareness of
the   selection           procedure,        (3)     clarity      of   implementation
procedure, and (4) frequency and thoroughness in monitoring.
      Awareness of Objectives. The respondents are highly aware
of the goal and the objectives of the 4Ps. Hence, one of the
strengths   of       the        Pantawid     Pamilyang        Pilipino   Program    is
respondents’ awareness of the program’s objectives. According to
the respondents, they are oriented on the different phases of
the program, most especially in the reasons on the selection of
the objectives and goal of the program. The 4Ps Municipal
Links, which is attached to the DSWD, explained thoroughly what
are expected of the program and of the recipients. They also
believe that these goals and objectives will be achieved. They
also added that outcomes for health, nutrition and education
were clearly achievable however economic and poverty alleviation
would be achieved in a slower pace.
       It goes to say that the agency in charge of crafting the
goal, objectives and expected outcomes of the program had done
their     duty     in   informing    and        explaining       them    to    the
beneficiaries. It is a good indication of the support of the
beneficiaries in attaining the expected outcomes of the program.
       Awareness   of   the   Selection    Process.       The    respondents   are
highly    aware    of   the   selection    process        in    identifying    the
program’s recipients because the DSWD explained it to them and
considered       the    selection    procedure       as        fair.    Thus   the
respondents’ 4Ps selection procedure is one of 4Ps strengths.
According to the respondents, when they are notified that they
are 4Ps recipients, the selection procedure was explained to
them and they also were able to ask questions on the merit of
their selection. Based on the explanations, they were also able
to realize that the selection procedure of the program is fair
and reasonable. This ensured that the program recipients knew
the process and procedure of selecting its recipient. This would
lessen the charges of irregularities and unfairness.
       Clarity of Implementation Procedure. The respondents have
very     clear    understanding     of    the     program’s       implementation
procedure which is well-done since the process is very detailed
and follows an organized and coherent flow. It means that the
“Clarity    of      the    Implementation      Procedure”        of   the    Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) is one of its strengths. This
means that the respondents understood the ways and details of
the program’s implementation and the things to be done and to be
avoided. This assumption was supported by the respondents during
the follow-up interviews. They said that even though in the
beginning        of       the     program      implementation         there         were
misunderstanding          and   confusion,     they       were   solved      after    a
dialogue and another meeting with the personnel concerned. Right
now, the recipients know by heart the implementation procedure,
the guidelines and the dos and don’ts and what are expected of
them to accomplish and prepare.
       Frequency and Thoroughness in Monitoring. The respondents
have    very     clear     understanding      of   the     program’s        monitoring
because its reason and procedure are clearly explained and in
detail thus frequency and thoroughness in monitoring is one of
the strengths of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps).
According      to   the    respondents,      the   best    manifestation       of    the
program monitoring is the monthly Family Development Session
(FDS) with their 4Ps Municipal Link. In that half day activity,
their    compliance        with    the      program’s      conditionalities          was
assessed and other recipients could verify and confirm their
actions that might or might not be acceptable to the program.
Also, the Municipal Links can be accessed any time if there is
mismanagement of funds and/or misbehavior that was committed by
the recipients through texts or calls and the concerned
Municipal Link can then have her investigation on the matter.
It shows that the respondents are aware of the schedule and
methods of monitoring of their consumption and disbursements of
the    program    grants.       It     will    lead      to    respondents       to    be
responsible; not to do things and acts that will make them break
the program’s conditionalities.
            Weaknesses of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program
                                        (4Ps).
       Weaknesses   of     the       program       are   the     internal      negative
characteristics     that       place     it    at     disadvantage        relative     to
others. The weaknesses of the program are measured in terms of
the    following:   (1)       proneness       to    corruption,       (2)    lapses    in
selection procedure, (3) understanding of the conditionalities,
(4)    non-compliance         of      implementation,          and     (5)     reactive
monitoring.
       Proneness to Corruption. Corruption is form of dishonest or
unethical     conduct    by    a     person    entrusted       with   a     position   of
authority, often to acquire personal benefit from it. The grand
mean   of    proneness    for      corruption       of   the    Pantawid      Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4Ps) is 2.60. The respondents had conflicting
answer in the items           under it. In the item “it is prone to
corruption      by     its      bureaucracy”,          the    respondents        answered
unlikely on this item. However in the item “it is prone to
corruption by its recipients”, the respondents answered likely.
       According to the respondents, with the rigid monitoring of
the   program    flow      in    the    higher    level,      corruption       might   not
happen and they trust those above them to follow their pledge
and   duties.   However,         they    said    that    they,      sometimes,     likely
corrupt or realign the grant which is for education and health
to other expenditures most especially for buying food, clothing
and    on   repair    of      their     houses    by    not    paying     first    their
obligations in the school. This means that the “Proneness to
corruption” is one of the weaknesses of the Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4Ps).
       Lapses in selection procedure. The respondents said that it
is    likely   that     the     selection       procedure     had      lapses,    allowed
unqualified people to be recipients and is not comprehensive
enough to include all those who really are in need, especially
those who have no permanent residence or houses. Unqualified
recipients,     according        to     the   respondents,       are    those    who   are
known    “richer      than      them”    in   the   community,         those     who   own
sizeable farms and lands, who are professionals and have stable
and higher monthly income. They also added that even if the
selection is fair, there are still lapses and the procedure
included those who really are in need. However, it only happened
in    the     first    months       of       the   program       implementation           as    they
observed and knew of families that had been delisted. It means
that    the      “lapses    in      the      selection     procedure”         is    one    of    the
weaknesses of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps).
       Understanding           of      the      conditionalities.           The     respondents
answered that it is likely that recipients had little to no
knowledge of the program’s conditionalities especially on the
reasons and how it is implemented. According to the respondents,
there are confusions and mix-ups on the compliance with these
conditionalities            especially              at     the        beginning           of     the
implementation of the program. They said, even if the personnel
involved explained it thoroughly, due to human stubbornness and
the inherent quality of humans in not following instructions,
they did not comprehend what was explained to them and they were
not    able      to   follow     what        was   expected      of    them.       However,      the
monthly       Family      Development           Sessions       (FDS)       helped    a     lot    in
ironing out this lack of understanding. The respondents also
added that only a lesser number of recipients do not know and
understand        these    conditionalities              and   they     are    causing         other
people      to    degrade        the      4Ps      recipients.        It    means     that       the
“understanding of the conditionalities” is one of the program’s
weaknesses.
       Non-compliance          with       implementation          conditionalities.              The
respondents said that it is likely that the recipients are prone
to    non-compliance           of    the    program.       However,        the     respondents
disagree that the program is susceptible to non-compliance by
its bureaucracy. This is because, according to them, they have
high respect and regard for the system and if there is non-
compliance in the higher level, it is just a small percentage of
it.    When   asked       if    they,       as   respondents         are    prone       to    non-
compliance         with    the        implementation           of    the        program,      the
respondents        answered         that    there    are    times      that       due    to   the
complicity of the procedure they circumvent it, especially on
spending of the cash grant they are receiving. When asked in
which part they feel the program implementation has gone wrong,
they   answered       that      it     is   in    the     releasing        of    cash   grants.
Sometimes, it is monthly then, every two months and sometimes
quarterly. They wanted to have a fixed schedule of the release
to ensure that they can pay their obligations, especially in the
school,       on     time.           It     means       that        non-compliance            with
implementation is one of the program’s weaknesses.
       Reactive monitoring. Reactive monitoring refers to the type
of monitoring on which the person in-charge will only conduct
inquiry after an event is reported to them. In the Pantawid
Pamilyang      Pilipino             Program      (4Ps),     reactive            monitoring      is
employed when 4Ps municipal-link will only investigate if he/she
receives complaints from the program recipients. The respondents
said that it is likely that the monitoring is prone to abuse,
encourage non-compliance and therefore defective. According to
them, the grievance system of the monitoring creates a hole in
the monitoring procedure. They added that because it is only
when there is a complaint from the recipients that the personnel
concerned   will   investigate,       it     provides      for   a   way   of    non-
compliance. When asked what makes this arrangement difficult to
file complaint for erring recipients, they said that they are
afraid    that   they   might      retaliate.        The    Family     Development
Sessions (FDSs) are good venue; however they felt uncomfortable
when they file complaint against their fellow recipients. They
suggested   that   community       people,    like    Barangay       officials    and
teachers, should help in the monitoring of compliance of the
recipients. It means that the reactive monitoring of the program
is one of its weaknesses.
    Opportunities of the           Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program
(4Ps)
    Opportunities       of   the    program    are    the    external      positive
elements that the program could exploit to its advantage. The
following are considered to be the program’s opportunities: (1)
improvement of recipients’ attitudes towards work, health and
schooling, (2) improvement and revision of the program in part
and as a whole, (3) poverty alleviation, and (4) increase in
enrolment, survival, attendance and participation rates to the
school.
    Improvement of recipients’ attitudes towards work, health
and schooling. The respondents said it is very possible that the
program     improves            their     attitudes       towards       work,    health     and
schooling    of       their       children.        It    shows       that     improvement    of
recipients’ attitudes towards work, health and schooling is one
of the programs opportunities.
    According              to    the     respondents,        they       have    become     more
enthusiastic          in    finding       for     work    because       4Ps     provides    for
additional       income         and     because    they    are       members    of   the    Phil
Health, they can send to the hospital or health centers the
family members who are not feeling well. Also, the compulsory
deworming and vaccination of their children ease their minds on
their     children’s            wellness.       They     also     are    enthusiastic       and
encouraged       in    sending          their     children      to    school     knowing    the
government will help them with their financial obligations and
classroom requirements.
    Improvement and revision of the program in part and as a
whole. The respondents said that it is very possible that the
program    can    become         an     effective       social,      citizen     empowerment,
values-strengthening program that will also address health and
educational needs. This means that Improvement and revision of
the program in part and as a whole is one of the program’s
opportunities. They said that the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Program (4Ps) has lapses and loopholes but is a good program and
they are helped a lot by this. They believed that the program
can be revised and improved to make it better in addressing
their families’ needs and help the citizens in this country.
They   were       also   glad   of   the   opportunities      that   the   program
brought for them especially in               seeing that they can improve
their lives by changing their bad attitudes. They are one in
asking      that   the   program     be    continued   however   revisions     and
improvements should be done to further enhance their lives and
living conditions.
       Poverty alleviation. It is very possible that the program
can    be    an    effective    program     in   addressing    and   alleviating
poverty and can break the intergenerational cycle of poverty.
This shows that poverty alleviation is one                    of the program’s
opportunities. The respondents noted that they are not as poor
as before after they became members of the Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4Ps). The program’s cash grants are big help
to address their immediate needs especially when it comes to the
schooling and health of their children. They felt that when
continued and improved, they might be able to live a better life
and that by sending their children to school, they will give to
their children a better and brighter future compared to what
they are living now. By the help of the program and their hard
work and perseverance, they will be able to break the chains of
poverty.
       Increase      in        enrolment,             survival,          attendance,         and
participation rates to the school. The respondents said that is
very    possible    that      the     program         increased        school’s      enrolment,
daily and monthly attendance, completion rate, survival rate and
parents’ participation in school projects and programs. It means
that     increase        in     enrolment,             survival,         attendance,         and
participation       rates       is       one    of     the    program’s        opportunities
because    these    are       elements         that    could      be    used    as   program’s
advantage.
       The respondents observed, they said, that there are fewer
children    who    are    not       in    school       and    they      are    sending     their
children to school every day and encourage their children to
study hard and avoid absences if possible. They also noted that
most of their children were able to complete their grade levels
and graduated from High School. Also, because of the 4Ps, they
participated in a lot of the activities and programs of the
school.    They    also       added      that    they       now   can    pay    on    time   the
financial    obligations         and       have       the    money      to    buy    for   their
children’s school projects and requirements.
       Threats of the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps)
       Threats are external negative elements in the environment
that could cause trouble and concern for the program. Threats to
the 4Ps are expressed in the following: (1) negative perception
of the program, (2) loss of funding, (3) development of “dole-
out” and dependency values among the recipients, (4) misuse of
funds by both the recipients and the 4Ps bureaucracy, and (5)
recipients’     vulnerability    to    be   compelled       to    do   authorities’
demands.
       Negative perception to the program. The respondents said
that it is likely that non-4Ps recipients and politicians have
negative perception of the program that may perhaps cause the
program to end. It shows that negative perception by both non-
recipients and politicians is one of the program’s threats.
When asked why they are fearful that negative perceptions of the
program can cause it to be scrapped by the national government,
they said that the government runs by satisfying the interest of
the majority. Thus, people having this negative perception might
persuade the government to stop the program. They are mostly
fearful of the negative perception of politicians, both in the
national and local levels of government especially when these
politicians are very vocal on terminating the program. They just
hope that if this program was stopped, the government will have
a   different   program   that   can    help    them    in       their    day-to-day
living.
       Loss of funding. The respondents said that it is likely
that   the   government   cost-cutting,        loss    of    trust       of   national
policy-makers and results of initial evaluation and assessment
will cause the loss of funding for the program. Thus, loss of
funding       is    one    of     the    program’s           threats.        According    to     the
respondents,         they       knew     that       there      are    many    critics     to     the
program and they wanted the budget for 4Ps to be transferred to
other     government            projects.          Also,       the     results       of   initial
evaluation and assessment and the loss of trust of national
policy-makers         will       pave        the    way      for     the    scrapping     of     the
program. Thus, losing of these funding will kill the program.
       Development          of     “dole-out”            and       dependency        values.     The
respondents         said    that        is    unlikely         that    they    are     developing
mendicant mentality, dependency attitudes and that they worked
less    and    made       less     effort          to   obtain       more    work.     Therefore,
development of “dole-out” and dependency values is not a threat
to the program. One of the many criticisms against the Pantawid
Pamilyang          Pilipino       Program          (4Ps)       is     that     the     recipients
allegedly      work       less    and        are    developing        mendicancy       and     being
dependent on the cash grant they will be receiving. When, asked
about this, the respondents felt sad at this kind of criticism.
They    said       that    they    are       hurt       by   being    looked     down     by    non-
recipients and even to the point of saying straight on their
faces that 4Ps is useless and the recipients should work harder
and not depend on the government dole-out. The respondents said
that there are some who are not exerting efforts in finding and
staying     in   work    because       of   the    program.       However,      they,     the
majority said that they are working harder because the cash
grants are only additional income and will never suffice to the
needs of their family. They also added that if they will be very
dependent on the cash grant, their family will certainly die
because the grants are not that sufficient for every family
expense and its releases are sometimes delayed.
      Misuse     of     funds    by    both       the    recipients       and    the     4Ps’
bureaucracy. The respondents said that it is unlikely that the
funds are misused by the program bureaucracy and recipients.
Therefore, misuse of funds by both the recipients and the 4P’s
bureaucracy is not a threat to the program.
      According       to   the        respondents,        the     public        should     be
confident and trust the 4Ps bureaucracy and its recipients that
there is no misuse of funds happening. Even if there are some
lapses in the monitoring procedure, the people should know that
misusing these funds is also like cheating themselves for this
is   for   the   betterment       of    their      families.       Even    though      there
really     are   erring    recipients         that      misused    their    grants,       the
public should not hastily generalize that the other recipients
are also doing this, since they are just a small number compared
to   the   recipients      that       religiously        and   dutifully        follow    the
guidelines and conditionalities of the program.
       Recipients’           vulnerability           to      be    compelled         to     do
authorities’ demands. The respondents said that it is unlikely
that the program is vulnerable to be used for personal reasons
by politicians and persons-in-authority and that it can be used
as     a    method     of    coercion      and       intimidation      by     authorities.
Therefore,          recipients’        vulnerability        to    be   compelled      to    do
authorities’ demands is not a threat to the program. According
to the respondents, they were not forced to do things that they
do not want because the higher-ups want them to do it. They had
been       members    of    the    program     for    two    elections      now    and    even
though       there    are    threats      of   being        delisted    for    not    voting
someone,       it    is     just   a    rumor.   For        the   Municipal       Links    and
Municipal       Social       Welfare     and   Development         Office     explain,     in
coordination with the Commission on Elections (COMELEC), that
the program is isolated and secluded from politics both local or
national, that they should vote for whoever they think is better
to be in that position.
       Also, a Grievance System is in place to report persons who
abuse their authority in compelling 4Ps members to do something.
                                Chapter III
                                METHODOLOGY
Locale of the Study
      Palapag   is   a   municipality    in   the   province     of   Northern
Samar, Philippines. It is located in the northernmost part of
Samar Island.
      The study will be conducted in Palapag and focuses on 4Ps
beneficiaries secondary students: there are about 134 recipients
of the program from Cabatuan National High school, consist of
260   recipients     from    Capacujan    National        High   School,     47
recipients from Jangtud Integrated School, 131 recipients from
Pangpang Integrated School, and 1377 recipients of the program
from Sumoroy Agro Industrial School, it has a total of 1818 4Ps
recipients.
Research Design
      To achieve the purpose of the study the researcher made use
the descriptive type of research; John W. Best pointed out that:
          Descriptive       research   describes    and    interpreted     what
      is. It is concerned with conditions or relationships that
      exist, practices that prevail, beliefs, points of view or
         attitudes that are held, processes that are seen, effects
         that are being felt, or trends that are developing.38
              Specifically, it tried to determine the respondent’s
         personal      profile       and      competencies           towards     their
         performance. It also examined the relationship between the
         three variables.
              The process of descriptive research goes beyond more
         gathering     and   tabulation      of    the     data.     It   involves   an
         element of interpretation and test of relationship.
The Variables
         Two general types of variables were included in this study,
independent      and    dependent     variables.          The   dependent    variables
comprised the personal profile of parent respondent such as sex,
age, highest educational attainment, main source of livelihood
and monthly income and the personal profile of 4Ps beneficiaries
such     as   age,   sex,    grade   level,       class    section    and   number   of
children in the family. The dependent variables in the study are
the      attitude,   health    status      and    academic      performance    of    4ps
beneficiary students.
38JohnW. Best Research in Education. (New Jersey: Practice Hall Inc.,1959) p
107. P 31 in Barlaan’s M.T
Population and Sampling
      This   study    will       employ   a   complete     enumeration       of   the
respondents. This means that all of the 1818 4ps beneficiary
secondary students and their parent/ guardian will be involve in
this study. Thus, no sampling method will be use.
The Respondents
      The respondents that will be involved in this study will be
the   1818   students      who   are   the    recipients   of     4Ps   in   Palapag
Northern Samar school year 2017-2018. It will also involve the
parent/ guardian of the beneficiary.
Research Instrument
      The study will be primarily utilized as self-design survey
questionnaire.       The     questionnaire        serves     as     the      primary
instrument in data gathering and interviews from the 4Ps leaders
at DSWD. The researcher will ask permission to look into solving
the problem and looking some documents gathered, the research
critically analyze the data first, to determine reliably and
second to determine the true meaning and value of the data.
Scoring Interpretation
       The profile of the 4Ps beneficiaries in terms of age, sex,
grade    level    and    class   section;   the   profile     of   the   parent-
respondent in terms of sex, age, highest educational attainment,
main source of livelihood, and monthly income; attitude of the
4Ps beneficiaries in terms of learning, socialization and self-
perception; health status of the 4Ps beneficiaries in terms of
body     mass    index    (BMI),   incidence      of   infectious    diseases,
nutritional       status     and    vaccinations;       and    the       academic
performance of 4Ps beneficiaries were given their corresponding
score.
Sex or the gender of the respondents
            Male
            Female
Age of the respondents
            12-13
            14-15
            16-17
            18-above
Grade level of the respondents
            Grade 7
            Grade 8
         Grade 9
         Grade 10
Class section of the respondents
         Section 1-5
         Section 6-10
         Section 11-15
Number of children in the family
         1-3
         4-7
         8-11
         12-above
Sex or gender of the parent respondent
         Male
         Female
Age of the parent respondent
         25-29
         30-34
         35-39
         40-44
`        45-49
         50-54
         55-59
         60-above
Highest educational attainment of parent respondent
         Elementary level
         Elementary graduate
         High school level
         High school graduate
         College level
         College graduate
         Vocational course
Main source of livelihood of parent-respondent
         Farmer (rice/coconut)
         Vendor
         Businessman
         Fisherman
         Government employee
         Others (Specify)
         None
Monthly income of parent-respondent
         P 5,000 and below
         P 5,001 – P 10,000
         P 10,001 – P 15,000
         P 15,001 – P 20,000
         P 20,001 – above
4Ps beneficiaries’ attitude reflecting learning, socialization
and self-perception
           4.2 – 5         Highly Satisfactory
           3.4 – 4.1       More satisfactory
           2.6 – 3.3       Satisfactory
           1.8 – 2.5       Moderate Satisfactory
           1.0 – 1.7       Less Satisfactory
4Ps   beneficiaries’   health   status   reflecting   body   mass   index
(BMI), incidence of infectious disease, nutritional status and
vaccinations.
           4.2 – 5         Highly Satisfactory
           3.4 – 4.1       More satisfactory
           2.6 – 3.3       Satisfactory
           1.8 – 2.5       Moderate Satisfactory
           1.0 – 1.7       Less Satisfactory
Academic performance evaluation of 4Ps beneficiaries
           4.2 – 5         Highly Satisfactory
           3.4 – 4.1       More satisfactory
           2.6 – 3.3       Satisfactory
           1.8 – 2.5       Moderate Satisfactory
           1.0 – 1.7       Less Satisfactory
Validation of Research Instrument
    Although     the   questionnaire       was   patterned    from    previous
studies it is modified to suit the purpose of this study.
Data Gathering Procedure
    The data needed in the study were gathered through series
of steps done by the researcher.
    Before the study was conducted, the researcher through a
letter   asked   permission     to   the   research      instructor,    thesis
adviser and the chairman of the graduate school to have a survey
on the designating school to distribute the questionnaires.
    Collection of data will be personally distributed by the
researcher. The questionnaire will individually given to each
respondent and collect personally. The respondents will be given
enough time to answer the questions.
Statistical Treatment
    Frequency    Counts   and    Percentage.      This    will   be    used   to
determine the percentage distribution on the profile variables
of sex, age, grade level, class section, number of children in
the family, highest educational attainment of parent-respondent,
main   source    of   livelihood     of    parents   and   monthly   income    of
parents.
       The formula will be:
                             F
                P =       ------- x 100
                             N
       Where:
           P = percentage
           F = frequency
           N = number of class
       Weighted Mean
       This will utilize to interpret the data on the level of
attitudes,      health      status   and    academic   performance     of     4Ps
beneficiaries respondents using the formula shown below.
           WM = _WF_
       Where: WM = Weighted Mean
                WF = Summation of weighted frequency
                N =   Total number of respondents
       The multiple regression analysis was used to determine the
relationship of the dependent variable. Hence, its formula is as
follows:
       Y = b0+b1+y1+b2+y2. . .+ by
    Where:   Y   is   the   variable   to   the   predicted   academic
performance of 4Ps beneficiaries in the Palapag, Northern Samar.
 QUESTIONNAIRE ATTITUDE, HEALTH STATUS, AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
      OF PANTAWID PAMILYANG PILIPINO PROGRAM (4Ps) IN SECONDARY
                    SCHOOLS OF PALAPAG, NORTHERN SAMAR
                             (STUDENT RESPONDENT)
Name (optional): ___________________________________________
School _____________________________________________________
Part I. Profile of the Respondents
Age                ( ) 12-13                  ( ) 16-17
                   ( ) 14-15                  ( ) 18- above
Sex                ( ) Male                   ( ) Female
Grade Level        ( ) Grade 7                ( ) Grade 9
                   ( ) Grade 8                ( ) Grade 10
Class Section      ( ) 1-3                    ( ) 8-11
                   ( ) 4-7                    ( ) 12 and above
Number of children in the family
               ( ) 1-3                        ( ) 7-9
               ( ) 4-6                        ( ) 10-above
Part II- Attitudes of the Respondents
           5   –   Always (A)
           4   –   Often (O)
           3   –   Sometimes (S)
           2   –   Seldom (SD)
           1   –   Never (N)
Statements                     A             O      S    SD   N
  1. I believe in folk saying
     about illnesses.
  2. I visit health center not
     only when I was sick.
  3. I believe that our family
     has adequate daily food
     intake.
  4. I have enough knowledge for
     our family to have proper
     nutrition and good health.
  5. I believe that not having
     illness is not enough to
     conclude that a person is
     healthy.
  6. I worry about my family’s
     nutritional     status    and
     health.
  7. I believe that my family is
     poor    because    we    lack
     resources.
  8. I believe that my family is
     not well-known so that we
     cannot enjoy the things we
     ought to enjoy.
  9. I believe that greed is
     within the hearts of the
     poor because of inequality
     experienced by them and
     this gives them the reason
     to cheat and to do crime.
  10.     I    believe   that   my
     family will remain poor no
     matter what.
  11.     I believe that the
     government    neglects    the
     poor   so   that   they   are
     forced to do crimes.
  12.     I believe that the
     resources of the community
     are for the rich and famous
     only.
  13.     My parents participate
     in gambling activities.
  14.     A monthly budget was
     allocated for alcohol or
     cigarettes.
  15.
Part III- Health Status of the Respondents
          5 – Always (A)
          4   –   Often (O)
          3   –   Sometimes (S)
          2   –   Seldom (SD)
          1   –   Never (N)
Statements                         A   O    S       SD   N
  1. I   was   my   hands   before
     eating.
  2. I visit the Rural/Barangay
     Health Unit regularly.
  3. I   receive    deworming   in
     school yearly.
  4. I attend Family Development
     Sessions (FDS).
  5. I       eat       green-leafy
     vegetables.
  6. I drink milk and eat foods
     rich in calcium (dark-green
     leafy vegetables).
  7. I drink 8 glasses of water
     a day.
  8. I select foods with Sangkap
     Pinoy     Seal     (fortified
     foods).
  9. I use iodized salt at home.
  10.      I drink coffee instead
     of milk.
  11.      I eat junk food for
     snacks.
  12.      I     attend     Family
     Development Seminar (FDS)
     once a month.
Part III- Academic Performance of the Respondents
          5   –   Always (A)
          4   –   Often (O)
          3   –   Sometimes (S)
          2   –   Seldom (SD)
          1   –   Never (N)
Statements                        A    O    S       SD   N
  1. I regularly attend school.
  2.
  3.
    4.
    5.
    6.
    7.
    8.