Appellate Case: 19-7045      Document: 010110254326          Date Filed: 11/04/2019       Page: 1
FILED
                                                                            United States Court of Appeals
                        UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                              Tenth Circuit
                              FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                               November 4, 2019
                          _________________________________
                                                                                Elisabeth A. Shumaker
                                                                                    Clerk of Court
  KARL FONTENOT,
        Petitioner - Appellee,
  v.                                                              No. 19-7045
                                                         (D.C. No. 6:16-CV-00069-JHP)
  SCOTT CROW, Interim Director,                                   (E.D. Okla.)
        Respondent - Appellant.
                       _________________________________
                                       ORDER
                          _________________________________
 Before HOLMES and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
                    _________________________________
        Scott Crow, the Interim Director for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections
 (ODOC), filed a motion for a stay pending appeal of the district court’s decision granting
 Oklahoma state prisoner, Karl Fontenot, a conditional writ of habeas corpus. The district
 court’s decision states that the writ will issue, unless within 120 days of the entry of its
 decision—which is December 19, 2019—the State of Oklahoma grants Mr. Fontenot a
 new trial or, in the alternative, orders his permanent release from custody.
        The State, through ODOC, seeks a stay pending appeal to prevent Mr. Fontenot’s
 immediate retrial or his permanent release. In his response to the stay motion,
 Mr. Fontenot states he does not oppose a stay of his retrial if he is released on bond
 pending the State’s appeal. He also agrees to be subject to conditions of release to ensure
 he stays in Oklahoma while this court considers the State’s appeal.
Appellate Case: 19-7045     Document: 010110254326          Date Filed: 11/04/2019     Page: 2
        After considering the parties’ submissions, the rules governing release in a habeas
 appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 23, and the traditional stay factors
 outlined in Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987), we grant in part and deny in
 part the motion for stay. We grant a stay pending appeal of the district court’s order to
 grant Mr. Fontenot a new trial. We deny the request to stay Mr. Fontenot’s release from
 custody on December 19, 2019. However, we direct the district court to set a briefing
 schedule for the parties to propose conditions of release for Mr. Fontenot pending appeal
 and, if necessary, to hold a hearing on appropriate conditions of release. The district
 court’s briefing schedule shall ensure that appropriate conditions of release are in place
 before Mr. Fontenot’s release on December 19, 2019.
                                               Entered for the Court
                                               ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk