Scribd
Upload
46 views1 page

And Practice, 20 (3), p.209

This document summarizes eight sources that examine group dynamics from various perspectives. Forsyth and Levi focus on general concepts of group dynamics and teams. Waller, Okhuysen, and Saghafian conceptualize emergent states to advance the study of group dynamics. Davis examines interorganizational relationships and collaboration between multiple partners. Pinto et al. study the impact of membership roles on subjective group dynamics and commitment to norms. Klonek et al. use sequential analysis to study dynamics in project meetings. Mulvey, Rizzo and Killen explore how gender stereotypes influence theory of mind and peer groups. Finally, Ho et al. aim to demystify insider threats by analyzing language cues in group settings

Uploaded by

MOUMITA BHATTACHARJEE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
46 views1 page

And Practice, 20 (3), p.209

This document summarizes eight sources that examine group dynamics from various perspectives. Forsyth and Levi focus on general concepts of group dynamics and teams. Waller, Okhuysen, and Saghafian conceptualize emergent states to advance the study of group dynamics. Davis examines interorganizational relationships and collaboration between multiple partners. Pinto et al. study the impact of membership roles on subjective group dynamics and commitment to norms. Klonek et al. use sequential analysis to study dynamics in project meetings. Mulvey, Rizzo and Killen explore how gender stereotypes influence theory of mind and peer groups. Finally, Ho et al. aim to demystify insider threats by analyzing language cues in group settings

Uploaded by

MOUMITA BHATTACHARJEE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Forsyth, D.R., 2018. Group dynamics. Cengage Learning.

Levi, D., 2015. Group dynamics for teams. Sage Publications.

Waller, M.J., Okhuysen, G.A. and Saghafian, M., 2016. Conceptualizing emergent states: A strategy
to advance the study of group dynamics. The Academy Of Management Annals, 10(1), pp.561-598.

Davis, J.P., 2016. The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships: Collaborating with multiple
partners in innovation ecosystems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), pp.621-661.

Pinto, I.R., Marques, J.M., Levine, J.M. and Abrams, D., 2016. Membership role and subjective group
dynamics: Impact on evaluative intragroup differentiation and commitment to prescriptive
norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), pp.570-590.

Klonek, F.E., Quera, V., Burba, M. and Kauffeld, S., 2016. Group interactions and time: Using
sequential analysis to study group dynamics in project meetings. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research,
and Practice, 20(3), p.209.

Mulvey, K.L., Rizzo, M.T. and Killen, M., 2016. Challenging gender stereotypes: Theory of mind and
peer group dynamics. Developmental science, 19(6), pp.999-1010.

Ho, S.M., Hancock, J.T., Booth, C., Burmester, M., Liu, X. and Timmarajus, S.S., 2016, January.
Demystifying insider threat: Language-action cues in group dynamics. In 2016 49th Hawaii
International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (pp. 2729-2738). IEEE.

(Forsyth, 2018)

(Levi, 2015)

(Waller, Okhuysen.) and Saghafian, 2016)

(Devis, 2016)

(Pinto et al., 2016)

(Klonek et al., 2016)

(Mulvey, Rizzo and Killen, 2016)

(Ho et al., 2016)

You might also like