67%(3)67% found this document useful (3 votes) 3K views12 pagesRizal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
MRL SINS.
CHAPTER 1
UNDERSTANDING
THE RIZAL LAW
on his landmark novels is inscribed in legislation. Republic Act
No. 1425, more popularly known as the Rizal Law, was passed in
1956 leaving a colorful narrative of debate and contestation,
T: mandatory teaching of José Rizal's life with the emphasis
As an introduction to the life and works of José Rizal, this textbook
will begin with the reading of the Rizal Law. In this chapter, you will
study RA 1425 within its context, look into the major issues and debates
surrounding the bill and its passage into law, and reflect on the impact
and relevance of this legislation across history and the present time.
In the course of the discussion, the process of how a bill
becomes a law in the Philippines will be tackled so you will have an
idea regarding the country’s legislative process. The life of one of the
major champions of the Rizal Law, Senator Claro M. Recto, will also be
discussed.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the end of this chapter, the students should be able to:
# locate the passage of the Rizal Law within its historical context;
4 determine the issues and interests at stake in the debate over the
Rizal Bill; and
# relate the issues to the present-day Philippines.AND WORKS OF JOSE RIZAL
2 THE LIFE
VOCABULARY
pitta measure which, if passed through the legislative prog
® Process,
becomes a law
unexpurgated — basically untouched. In the case of the ng
unexpurgated versions were those that were not changeq
parts that might offend people.
VElS OF Riza (
OF Censor,
to remove ed
bicameral ~ involving the two chambers of Congress: the Senate
the House of Representatives ang
4
The Context of the Rizal Bill
The postwar period saw a Philippines rife with challenges
and problems. With a country torn and tired from the stresses of
World War Il, getting up on their feet was a paramount concern
of the people and the government.
Bill is filed in the Senate Offa
of the Secretary. Itis given 8
number and calendared for x
reading.
l
eet STEP 4
First Reading.
The bill's title,
number, and
author(s) are
tead onthe floor, yep
Afterwards, it —
is referred to
the appropriate
committee.UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW) 3
Voting on Third Reading. Copies of the final
= versions of the bill are distributed to the
members of the Senate who will vote for its,
approval or rejection.
e Se Consolidation of
= os Version from the
House. The similar
steps above are
followed by the House
— Vtg on Second ee isn
a £V) Reading. The senators ‘coming up with the
Fy — vote on whether to Srer7 —_ 2PProved bill if there
approve or reject the are differences between
‘STEPS bill. If approved, the bill the Senate and House
is calendared for third versions, a bicameral
vith challenges | | reeding Conference committee
is called to reconcile
eis scteares oa | the two. After this, both
mount concern | chambers approve the
} consolidated version.
|
t ‘Second Reading.
led in the Senate Off The bills reed and
secretary. It is givena | discussed on the floor. st
“and calendared for fis | TiS citer dees a
I sponsorship speech
STEP4 The other members Transmittal of the Final Version to
1 k of the Senate may Malacaijian. The bill is then submitted
engage in discussions to the President for signing. The
regarding the bill President can either sign the bill into
and a period of law or veto and return it to Congress.
debates will pursue.
‘Amendments may be
Suggested to the bill,
Committee Hearings. The bill is discussed within the committee
and a period of consultations is held. The committee can
i
cing-
title,
and
ore STEP 3 2PPfOVe (approve without revisions, approve with amendments,
ras or recommend substitution or consolidation with similar bills) or
a reject. After the committee submits the committee report, the bill
at is calendared for second reading.sé RIZAL ==
philippines grappled with various chat
Hipp nation-building, Prominent indivi alee,
ationalism came to action. They pursued gover, Who
«instill patriotism and love for country in the hee
ds of the Filipinos. These people drew inspiration from a
and minds of te TT of the revolution for independence Ting
t
ine expe! |
mis exper es ofthat important period inthe oun,
8
history:
One measure sought was the passage of the Republic Act
No. 1425 or the Rizal Law, which was primarily set to address
«, need for a re-dedication to the ideals of freedom and
nationalism for which our heroes lived and died.” The passage of
the law was met with fierce opposition in both the Senate and the
House of Representatives.
p worKS OF Jo!
From the Rizal Bill to the Rizal Law
On April 3, 1956, Senate Bill No. 438 was filed by the
Senate Committee on Education, On April 17, 1956, then Senate
Committee on Education Chair Jose P, Laurel sponsored the
ee delivering speeches for the proposed legislation.
Chun ; the bill became controversial as the powerful Catholic
influen fa n to express opposition against its passage As the
ce of the Church was felt with members of the Semi"
voicing thei _
Reta at 9PPosition to the bill, its main author, Clare M.
is allies in the Senate entered into a fierce battle
arguing for b
35a. °* the passage of SB 438. Debates started 0” ‘April 23;
The del
of Represens eS on the Rizal Bill also ensued in the House
of SB 438, wanes House Bill No. 5561, an ‘dentical versio®
on April Bt filed by Representative Jacobo 2- Gonzales
approved the bill 56. The House Committee 7
the debates ¢ ill without amendments on May 2+
the debates ommenced on May 9, 1956. A major PO
Was
Whether the compulsory readin& of the eeeee"
hallengeg UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW 5
lu s
Wa’ Who
the ment i eS i
hearts CLARO M. RECTO:
nN from th, (February 8, 1890-October 2, 1960)
ce =
ABaingt The main sponsor and defender of the Rizal Bill:
= country’s was Claro Mayo Recto. He was born in Tiaong, Tayabas:
(Quezon) on February 8, 1890 to Claro Recto. st. and
Micaela Mayo. He completed his primary education in his
hometown and his secondary education in Batangas. For
} his college education, he moved to Manila and completed
edom and f his AB degree at the Ateneo and was awarded maxima
Passage of | ‘cum laude in 1909. In 1914, he finished his law degree from
ate and the | the University of Santo Tomas. He was admitted to the bar
that same year
His political career started in the House of
Representatives In 1919 when he was elected as
representative of the third district of Batangas: He later
became House Minority Floor Leader. From the House of
iled by the Representatives, he moved to the Senate in 4931 when
Zz
then Senate he was elected as a senator. In the Senate, he held key 2
positions such as Minority Floor Leader, Majority Floor 2
nsored the Leader, and Senate President Pro-Tempore, Recto's career 3
legislation ie the Philippine government was not confined to the 3
ful Catholic legistature. In 1935, he became ‘Associate Justice of the 2
age: As the ‘Supreme Court
f the Senate Recto was also instrumental in the drafting of the
yr, Claro M. constitution of the Philippines in 1934-1935 as he was
ce pattle selected president of the assembly. After the Philippines
aon 23, transitioned to the Commonwealth Period and survived
on
the Pacific War, Recto again served as senator for several
tems, He also served as diplomat end was an Important
figure in international relations.
known as an ardent nationalist, Recto was also a
man of letters. He penned beautiful poetry and prose. On
October 2, 1960, he died of a heart attack In italy. He was
survived by his wife, Aurora Reyes and thelr five children.6 THE LIFE AND WORKS OF José Riza,
Noli Me Tangere and BI Filibusterismo appropy
ate
7 The ca d
bill was constitutional. The call to read the nen in thy
versions was also challenged. Ur Batey a
A The Det
As the country was soon engaged in the debate,
% it se
that an impasse was reached. To move the procedure to qn! Read the following
© the ne
he bill gg
Pulsory readin,
step, Senator Jose P. Laurel proposed amendments to 4
May 9, 1956. In particular, he removed the com
and added that Rizal’s other
legislators who support
Law in 1956, Then, ans
of Rizal’s novels
works must aly, FOR ———
be included in the subject. He, however, remained adamant ah,
stand that the unexpurgated versions of the novels be read. 0, | “Noli Me Téngere and
5 i They must be taken to
May 14, 1956, similar amendments were adopted to the House ios oun detects
| ina mirror, our
version,
our vices. Only then we
so learn to prepare ou
lead to self-reliance, sé
‘The amended version of the bills was also subjected to
scrutiny but seemed more palatable to the members of Congress,
The passage, however, was almost hijacked by technicality since
the House of Representatives was about to adjourn in a few
days and President Ramon Magsaysay did not certify the bills s
Priority. The allies in the House skillfully avoided the insertion of
any other amendment to
(which would take time).
“Rizal did not pretend
books. He aimed at ir
national dignity, persc
prevent the need to reprint new copies sara nats Grae
. They also asked the Bureau of Printing practices inthe Phil
Hoan, He same templates for the Senate version in printing he and behavior of erin
cic iio Thus, on May 17, 1956, the Senate and Houst portrayed faithfully t
“esions were approved, a existed"
‘The approved os. :
20d on June 19 poeeions Were then transmitted to Malacaa
AW which becarne po? resident Magsaysay signed the bill into
Republic Act No, 1425, AGAINST -
“A vast majority of 0:
Filipino citizens. As :
and their faith. Thes
harmonious affectio
This is the basis of
nationalism and relijected to
Congress,
ality since
in a few
he bills as
sertion of
w copies
f Printing
nting the
\d House
alacafan
bill into
UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW 7
The Debates about the Rizal Bill
Read the following excerpts from the statements of the
legislators who supported and opposed the passage of the Rizal
Law in 1956. Then, answer the questions that follow.
FOR
“Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo must be read by all Filipinos.
‘They must be taken to heart, for in thelr pages we see ourselves a8
ina mirror, our defects as well as our strength, our virtues as well as
our vices. Only then would we become conscious as a people and
so learn to prepare ourselves for painful sacrifices that ultimately
lead to self-reliance, self-respect, and freedom.”
Senator Jose P. Laurel
“Rizal did not pretend to teach religion when he wrote those
books. He aimed at inculcating civic consciousness in the Filipinos,
national dignity, personal pride, and patriotism and if references
were made by him in the course of his narration to certain religious
‘e Philippines in those days, and to the conduct
15 of the church, it was because he
| situation in the Philippines as it then
practices in th
and behavior of erring minister
portrayed faithfully the general
existed.”
Senator Claro M. Recto
ne
RA
“Avast majority of our people are, at the same time, Catholic and
Filipino citizens. As such, they have two great loves: their country
‘and their falth, These two loves are not conflicting loves. They are
harmonious affections, like the love for his father and for his mother.
te a conflict between
This is the basis of my stand. Let us not creat
ment and the church”
nationalism and religion, between the govern
Senator Francisco “Soc” Rodrigo
ee“
1 What wan then
Hh Mud
te! Medeiwes api 4 ,
1 Whar wae a
He Hifi arg
Wat wae te Muiienit 4a)
! Haw la Me Havin 4 va
tle His al Hl th,
A
we thy
whe jotta
NONI OTe LEVEL HEH eto
We Hin ll Inca He ainpyna vere and
HH tNeoe wtatenientad
wir pes.
ph KONO WALA 8 1
PHIRI MADE, SPARE
1s ue, WO waets HORT
se erst WAS AE TAO
MCAT INS Yie PRETO
FO 1 NOSES
WERE, ins, 18
WHEREAS, 4 1 eet
wis iiss an Wen ¢
deviaion 9
WHEREAS, the life, 1
hevvets Hall Me Tangere 20 €OF
souvent patrionisen yin ones
nis formative and deciahve
WHEREAS, al) educations
pubjact to regulation by
Wwach the duties of citize= _—_
UNDERSTANDING THE RIZAL LAW 9
The Rizal Law and the Present Context
In groups, talk about the preceding questions and prepare @
short summary of your discussion points to be presented in class.
Do you think the debates on the Rizal Law have some
resonance up to the present? If yes, In what way? If no, why?
FURTHER READING
The Rizal Law
Sage of
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 1425
AN ACT TO INCLUDE IN THE CURRICULA OF ALL PUBLIC AND
] PRIVATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES COURSES ON
THE LIFE, WORKS AND WRITINGS OF JOSE RIZAL, PARTICULARLY
HIS NOVELS NOLI ME TANGERE AND EL FILIBUSTERISMO,
a AUTHORIZING THE PRINTING AND DISTRIBUTION THEREOF, AND
FOR OTHER PURPOSES
WHEREAS, today, more than any other period of our history, there
is aneed for a re-dedication to the ideals of freedom and nationalism for
— which our heroes lived and died;
WHEREAS, it is meet that in honoring them, particularly the national
hero and patriot, Jose Rizal, we remember with special fondness and
rs and devotion their lives and works that have shaped the national character;
WHEREAS, the life, works and writing of Jose Rizal, particularly his
novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo, are a constant and inspiring
source of patriotism with which the minds of the youth, especially during
their formative and decisive years in school, should be suffused;
WHEREAS, all educational institutions are under the supervision of,
and subject to regulation by the State, and all schools are enjoined to
— develop moral character, personal discipline, civic conscience and to
aa teach the duties of citizenship; Now, therefore,JO THe LIFE AND WORKS OF 10H Rizay
SECTION 1, Courses on the Ife, Works and wrtings of
pamtculety tis novels Noll Me Tangere and E Filbusterisn 7 Beg
included in the curricula of all Schools, colleges and univer sae baifuapetene
or private: Provided, That In the collegiate courses, the ae 2 a aa
unexpargated ealtions of the Nol! Me Tangere and E! Fibusenr Ccachers and other
their English translation shall be used as basic texts, 7 SECTION 5.Th
The Boat of National Education Is hereby authorized and drecey authorized to be apr
to adopt forthwith measures to Implement and carry out the provision eee
of this Section, including the writing and printing of appropriate primes SECTION 6. Tt
readers and textbooks. The Board shall, within sixty (60) days from the
effectivity of this Act, promulgate rules and regulations, including those
‘of a disciplinary nature, to carry out and enforce the provisions of this
Act. The Board shall promulgate rules and regulations providing for the
exemption of students for reasons of religious bellef stated in a sworn ens
written statement, from the requirement of the provision contained in The Rizal L:
the second part of the first paragraph of this section; but not from taking in the postwar ]
the course provided for in the first part of said paragraph. Said rules and
regulations shall take effect thirty (30) days after their publication in the
Official Gazette.
Approved: Jun
Published in th
was trying to g
aiming. towards
ways to unite th
aise 2.1 shall be obligatory on all schools, colleges and inspiration from
epi ‘to keep in thelr libraries an adequate number of copies Spain. In this fr
El Fitbusten ys UhePurgated editions of the Noli Me Tangere and Rizal, particular
std unexpurgee eel 88 Of Rizal's other works and biography. The EI Filibusterism
or ther translations pl "s of the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo and public edu
Included in the list of = bel 8S well as other writings of Rizal shall be however, met oj
OF Prvate Schools, colleges ws POOKS for required reading in all public ‘After much deb
Sand
The Board of Nate universities,
the number of books net Education
college or unverse® S8Pending yc el determine the adequacy of
"9 Upon the
e ooh ae
SECTION are, nrollment of the sch
; Pees
Writings Of JOSE Rizal into gr7e"® Bhd Ef
dialects: cause them to pq again, CuSterismo, as well as other
them to be distributed, je PtMted in gp w°9 ANd the
law and became
Constantino, F
hierarchy. I
colonial po
OF Natioy
met Education shall cause the
ee 7 Principal Philippine
through the Purok orgere ©! harge, yee, Bo
aoneay C290, ej POPUIr editions; and couse Laurel, Jose B,
country. 8 ang P8tSons dos
Barrio gee eS!NG to read them, Bulletin 4(
‘SuNcIIS throughout the0.
©d and di,
Ut the pro 8cteg
TOpriate
0) dave Primers,
lays fr
including wet
>TOvisions of ths
Providing for the
tated in a swom
lon contained jn
t Not from taking
h. Said rules and
)ublication in the
S, colleges and
imber of coples
Me Tangere and
| biography. The
El Filibusterismo
of Rizal shall be
ding in all public
the adequacy of
1t of the school
shall cause the
as well as other
neipat Philippine
itions; and cause
ng to read them.
; throughout the
Unpunstanino ri Mizak baw Th
SECTION 4. Nothing In this Act shall be construed ay amendment
hundied lwenty-seven of the Administrative
‘or repealing section nine
school
Code, prohibiting the discussion of religious doctsines by publi
teachers and other persons engaged In ary public school
SECTION 5. The sum of three hundred thousand pesos I hereby
authorized to be appropriated out of any und not atherwise appropriated
in the National Treasury to carry out the purposes of this Act
SECTION 6. This Act shall take effect upon Its approval
Approved: June 12, 1956
Published In the Official Gazette, Vol. 52, No, 6, p,29711n June 1966.
FeamnvaieRSEaSsASUMMARY SSCs
landmark legislation
The Rizal Law could be considered
in the postwar Philippines, During, this period, the Philippines
was trying to get up on its feet from a devastating war and
ng. As the government sought
aiming towards nation-buildi
Jators like Claro M. Recto drew
ways to unite the people, legis!
inspiration from the lives of the heroes of the revolution against
‘ame, the teaching of the life and works of José
Spain, In this fr:
Jing, of his novels Noli Me Tangere and
Rizal, particularly the rea
EI Filibusterismo, was proposed to be mandated to all private
and public educational institutions. The proposed legislation,
arly from the Catholic Church.
however, met opposition particul
After much debate, the proposed bill was eventually signed into
Jaw and became Republic Act No. 1425.
Eyerex aans
Constantino, Renato. 1969. The Rizal Law and the Catholic
hierarchy, In The making of a Filipino: A story of Philippine
colonial politics, pp. 244-247. Quezon City: Malaya Books.
Laurel, Jose B., Jr. 1960. The trials of the Rizal Bill. Historical
Bulletin 4(2): 130-139.12. THe Lire AND WoRKS OF JOSE RIZAL
: Act 1425- Available
6. Republic :
Oe 1956/06/1 2/republic- BE
Republic of the Philippines.
|gazette.gov.ph
from hetp:/Iwww.officia
act-no-1425/
Schumacher, John. 2011. The Rizal Bill
Costa and the bishops. Philippine Stu:
“Legislative Process.”
Website of the Senate of the Philippines.
‘Available from https://www.senate.gov.ph/about/legpro-asP
of 1956: Horacio de la
dies 59(4): 529-553.
he p
behi
instil
This chapte
context. It
a precurso
it. Likewise
with nation
The ch
which is an
At the end
4 define
Nation.
4
4
@ppral
expla