Scribd
Upload
84 views1 page

Scoring Guideline

This document provides a scoring guideline for evaluating oral presentations. It rates aspects of the content and delivery on a scale from 50 to 100, with below 50 being poor and 90-100 being excellent. For content, it evaluates the clarity and support of the introduction, main points, sub-points, and conclusion. For delivery, it considers the speaker's eye contact, gestures, grammar, pronunciation, volume, and rate of speech. Extra points are given for the effective use of media aids.

Uploaded by

Luthfan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
84 views1 page

Scoring Guideline

This document provides a scoring guideline for evaluating oral presentations. It rates aspects of the content and delivery on a scale from 50 to 100, with below 50 being poor and 90-100 being excellent. For content, it evaluates the clarity and support of the introduction, main points, sub-points, and conclusion. For delivery, it considers the speaker's eye contact, gestures, grammar, pronunciation, volume, and rate of speech. Extra points are given for the effective use of media aids.

Uploaded by

Luthfan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Scoring Guideline*

Evaluation of oral presentation


Assign a number of each box according to your assessment of the various aspects of the speaker’s
speech.
90 – 100 Excellent
80 – 89 Very good
70 – 79 Good
60 – 69 Satisfactory
50 – 59 Needs improvement
<50 Poor

Content:
The purpose of the speech was clear.

The introduction had the following elements and interesting.

• attention-getter
• motivating audience
• preview of speech
The main points were clear, well-supported, and sources were documented.

The sub-points were clear, well-elaborated, and sources were documented.

The conclusion had the following elements and effective.

• summary statement
• eliciting audience response

Delivery:
The speaker maintained eye contact with the audience.

The speaker used gestures and body language well.

The speaker’s grammar was correct and didn’t prevent understanding.

The speaker’s pronunciation was clear and comprehensible.

The speaker’s volume and rate of speech were appropriate.

Extra Points:
The speaker used media, i.e. audio-visual aids, slides, handouts, etc., effectively.

*Adapted from H. Douglas Brown and Priyanvada Abeywickrama, Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice, (Boston: Pearson-Longman), pp.
179-180.

You might also like