Convertible Bonds: A Guide for Investors
Convertible Bonds: A Guide for Investors
• Bondholder has the right to convert the bond into common shares at
some contractual price (conversion number may change over time).
• Issuer’s call and holder’s put
• Conversion premium and break-even calculations
• Decomposition of convertible value into different components
- bond plus warrant plus default risk
- put plus stock plus yield advantage
• Interest rate sensitivities – duration
• Lattice tree calculations: incorporation of default risk, call and
conversion rights
1
Holder’s perspective: take advantage of the future potential growth of
issuer’s company
Issuer’s perspective: raise capital at a lower cost by the provision of
conversion privilege to bond holders
convertible
bond price conversion value
conversion
premium
straight bond value
stock price
2
Equity perspective on convertibles
• To have the flexibility to call if they think they can refinance the debt
more cheaply.
For example, the closing price of stock has been in excess of 150% of
the conversion price on any 20 trading days within 30 consecutive days.
• Duration is the weighted average of times of cash flow stream, weighted according
to the present value of the cash flow amount. Percentage change in bond price is
proportional to negative yield change, where the proportional constant is the
duration.
6
Put above par value or premium redemption at maturity
Investors’ perspective
Even if the conversion turns out to be unprofitable, they are
guaranteed a 7.5 percent return to the time of the put.
7
Convertible bond issued by the Bank of East Asia
US$250,000,000
2.00 percent Convertible Bonds due 2003
8
Conversion feature
9
Put feature
10
Call feature
Redemption at the On or after July 19, 1998, the Issuer may redeem
option of the the Bonds at any time in whole or in part at the
bondholders principal amount of each Bond, together with
accrued interest, if for each of 30 consecutive
Trading Days, the last of which Trading Days is
not less than five nor more than 30 days prior to
the day upon which the notice of redemption is
first published, the closing price of the Shares as
quoted on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange shall
have at least 130 percent of the Conversion Price
in effect on such Trading Day.
11
Soft call protection
Parisian feature
The closing price has to be above 130 percent of the conversion price on
consecutive 30 trading days.
In most cases, the reset on conversion price is downward and this makes
the bond more valuable. For example, the conversion number is reset
by dividing the par by the prevailing stock price.
Floor limit
The extent of downward reset cannot be below a certain multiplier of
the first conversion price.
13
Hong Kong example - market manipulation on conversion
China Travel
China Travel (a red chip company in Hong Kong) issued a convertible
bond with coupon rate 4.25% per annum in Nov., 1993, near the peak of
1993 bull market, with maturity date in Nov., 1998. The conversion price
is HK$3.66.
• Market background
14
• Possible market manipulation
China Travel owned more than 30% of its company’s total shares, and
the red chip stocks were widely held by other red chip companies.
Therefore, it was relatively easy to push up the share prices in bull
market situation.
• Constraint on calling
The daily closing stock price had to stay over HK$5.49 (call price =
150% x conversion price) for more than 20 of the 30 consecutive
trading days. This provision makes market manipulation more difficult
and easily detectable.
15
Failed attempt of conversion
• On 6 Aug., 1997, the share price went above the call price for the
first time and managed to stay above for 17 trading days.
• In Sept., 1997, the share price stayed above the call price for two
more days (only one day short of the call requirement).
• Unfortunately, the share price went down under the general market’s
big drop.
• Within two months after the failed attempt, the share price dropped
below HK$3.66, and within one year, it fell below HK$1.0.
• The share price of China Travel fell much faster than the general
stock market, suggesting a strongly inflated price before the market
crash.
16
Premium for conversion right
17
Analytics of convertible bonds
Conversion value
= equity value or stock value of the convertible
= stock price x conversion ratio
= $30.00 x 27.50 = $825.00
19
Conversion premium
= (convertible price – conversion value)
/ conversion value
= ($1,000 – $825) / $825.00 = 21.21%
Dollar premium
= convertible price – conversion value (expressed
in points)
= ($1,000 – $825) / $1,000 x 100%
= 17.50 points
20
Break even calculations
Break even (years)
= conversion premium / (convertible yield – stock yield)
= 21.21 / (7.00 – 1.67) = 3.98 (years)
Dollar maintenance
market price – conversion value
=
coupon − market price stock dividend
stock price
23
Convertible = bond + warrant
• Interest rates
• Credit rating/spreads
• Coupon
• Duration
Stock performance
• Embedded strike price
• Common dividend yield and dividend growth rate
• Stock volatility
• Life of warrant / call protection
24
Put plus stock plus yield advantage
25
Casino operator brings ringgit convertible
• Malaysia's only casino operator, Resorts World,
has raised M$1.1 billion ($300 million) from a
convertible bond that was well received despite
offering a negative yield.
• Issuing the zero-coupon bonds at par and setting the
redemption price at 99%, which results in a yield to
maturity of -0.5%. Desire to see bonds convert
prompts Resorts World to use rare negative yield
structure.
• The conversion price was fixed at launch at 10%
over yesterday's (September 7, 2006) volume
weighted average price of M$11.593, giving an initial
26
conversion price of M$12.75.
• There is an issuer call after one year, subject to a 120%
hurdle, to force conversion in case investors drag their
feet.
• The reset mechanism has a floor at 90.9% of the original
conversion price, which is high compared with the
typical reset floor at 80-85%. The floor is equal to
yesterday's volume weighted average price.
• The bonds were priced assuming a credit spread of 40
basis points over the Malaysian interest rate curve, a
dividend yield of 2.2% = 120% of the previous year's,
and a stock borrow cost of 5%. Note that the issuer is
essentially shorting stock.
27
Issuer’s perspectives
• While common a few years back when interest rates were
much lower, negative yields are rarely seen on CBs
nowadays but highlights the issuer's desire to have the
bonds convert in order to get equity on its balance sheet.
• The bonds have a short maturity of only two years, a
conversion premium of only 10% and two conversion
price resets - after the first year and 60 days before
maturity - making it all but inevitable that the bonds will
convert.
• The issuer is essentially saying that it is happy to sell
equity at today's market price, but not lower. The
expected appreciation of the ringgit makes the bonds a
reasonable proposition. 28
Investor’s perspectives
29
• The share price is up a modest 4.5% this year to
Thursday's closing price of M$11.70, which
compares with a 6.2% gain in the Kuala Lumpur
Composite Index.
• There is no stock lending available at the moment,
although Resorts World, which is a subsidiary of
conglomerate Genting, is among a group of stocks
that is qualified for short-selling once this becomes
available.
30
Intrinsic value of convertibles
The intrinsic value of a convertible bond is the greater of
1. Conversion value
2. Bond investment value – value as a corporate bond
without the conversion option (based on the convertible
bond’s cash flow if not converted).
present present
value value
Years payment factor
1 - 20 $80 8.514 $681.12
20 $1,000 0.149 $149.00
$830.12
take r = 10%
32
Estimation of the discount rate
33
Valuation of convertible debts
List of parameters
Coupon rate
Creditworthiness of the issuer
Maturity date
Conversion premium
Ratio of conversion price to current stock price
Volatility of the stock price
Dividend yield of the stock price
Presence of other embedded option features, like callability
and puttability
Prevailing risk free interest rate and volatility of interest rate
Correlation of the stock price with the interest rate
34
Duration
Duration is the weighted average of the times that the
principal and interest payments are made.
n
∑ t
tC
t =1
/(1 + i ) t
duration = n
∑ t
C
t =1
/(1 + i ) t
38
Interest rate sensitivity (cont’d)
Basic Int rate Change Int rate Change
price + 1% -1%
_______________________________________________________
Investment value $847.84 $812.75 -$35.09 884.74 $36.90
39
Correlation with interest rates
Consider the impact of an increase on interest rate
The future share price is expected to be higher because of
higher drift rate.
Due to negative correlation between interest rate and share
price (say, the S&P 500-stock index has a correlation of about
minus 0.5), the share price drops first.
pwu + (1 − p)wd.
42
conv = value of stocks received if conversion takes place
call = call price
roll = value given by the rollback
(neither converted nor recalled)
45
Example
A 9-month discount bond issued XYZ company with a face
value of $100. Assume that it can be exchanged for 2 shares
of company’s stock at any time during the 9 months.
* It is callable for $115 at any time.
* Initial stock price = $50, σ = 30% per annum and no
dividend; risk-free yield curve to be flat at 10% per annum.
* Yield curve corresponding to bonds issued by the company
to be flat at 15%.
* Tree parameters are: u = 1.1618, d = 0.8607, p = 0.5467,
R = e0.1Δt = 1.0253.
* At maturity, the convertible is worth max (100, 2ST).
46
Binomial tree for pricing a risky convertible bond
equity 78.42
8 10%
67.49 156.84
10%
D
8
58.09 134.98
8
11.03% equity 58.09
B 11%
8116.18 50.00 116.18
50.00 812.27%
11.59% A E
104.85 43.04 8
105.56
8 13.51% 8 bond
43.04
C 15%
98.00 37.04 8 100.00
8 15%
F
96.32
upper figure: stock price
bond 31.88
middle figure: discount rate
lower figure: value of convertible
8 15%
47
100.00
At node D
Roll back gives the bond value
(0.5467 × 156.84 + 0.4533 × 116.18)e-0.1 × 0.25 = 134.98.
The bondholder is indifferent to conversion or hold, also the
issuer is also indifferent as to whether the bond is called;
the correct discount rate at node D is 10%.
At node F
The correct discount rate is 15% since the convertible is
contain not to be converted if node E is reached.
At node E
The correct discount rate is
0.5467 × 10% + 0.4533 × 15% = 12.27%.
The value of convertible at E
(0.5467 × 116.18 + 0.4533 × 100)e-0.1227 × 0.25 = 105.56.
The bond should be neither converted nor called. 48
At node B
The discount rate is
0.5467 × 10% + 0.4533 × 12.27% = 11.03%
and value of convertible is
(0.5467 × 134.99 + 0.4533 × 105.56)e-0.1103 × 0.25 = 118.34.
It is optimal to call the bond at node B so that it causes
immediate conversion and leads to $116.18. The discount
rate at node B should be taken to be 10%, since conversion
takes place at this node.
At node A
The discount rate is
0.5467 × 10% + 0.4533 × 13.51% = 11.59%.
The convertible value at node A is
(0.5467 × 116.18 + 0.4533 × 98.00)e-0.1159 × 0.25 = 104.85.
If the bond has no conversion option, its value is
e-0.75 × 0.15 = 89.36. 49
The value of conversion option = 104.85 − 89.36 = 15.49.
Structured convertibles
- Mandatory convertibles
(performance based conversion premium, parallel debts)
- LYON (Liquid Yield Option Note)
- Exchangeables
- convertible stock notes
- Debt exchangeable for common stock
50
Mandatory convertible securities
Product nature
51
52
Mandatory convertible securities (cont’d)
• Issue price – lower strike price: The same as the common stock
price at the time of issue.
• Conversion price – upper strike price: This is the price at which the
MCS are convertible into common stock at a premium to the issue
price.
55
56
Perspective of the investor
57
Numerical example
Stock price at issue $27.875
Upper strike $30.750
Lower strike $25.000
Valuation
Long stock value $27.875
Long 0.8130 calls struck at $30.750 $5.411
Short 1 call struck at $25 -$9.228
Present value of net cash flow +$4.391
_______
Fair value $28.450
58
Performance based conversion premium
1. If the stock goes up from the issue price, the participation is
at first delayed until the point of the upper strike, and then
rises at a reduced rate equal to the upper conversion
number.
2. On the downside, participation is one-for-one with the
stock.
• All the proceeds from the sale of the MCS are invested in
US Treasuries with maturities same as that of the MCS.
• The yield from the Treasuries is supplemented with an
additional fee from the issuer to arrive at the stated yield on
the MCS.
Parallel debt
• The issuer enters the public debt market to issue an interest
bearing note with a maturity and face amount similar to the
terms of MCS.
61
Parallel debt MCS (cont’d)
Example
Pennzoil owned over 18,000,000 shares of Chevron common stock. Using this stock as
collateral, Pennzoil issued over $902,000,000 worth of bonds convertible into Chevron
shares.
Advantages
Received the proceeds for selling the issues at a 21% premium over Chevron’s
current stock price.
Pennzoil received $33.4 million annually in dividends from the Chevron shares.
Disadvantage
Forfeit the potential upside growth of the stock price.
64
Liquid Yield Options Note (LYON)
2. Investors were given a put option at a price equal to the original offering price of
the LYONs plus the interest that accrues to the date of the put.
Since the put price is based on a yield-to-maturity consistent with the time frame of the
put, companies can issue what is essentially longer-term debt at rates equivalent to those
of short to intermediate maturities.
65
LYON example – Motorola Inc. 0% Due 2013
Risk/Reward Table
66
Example of LYON – Waste Management, Inc.
Issued on April 12, 1985.
Face value of $1,000 maturing on Jan. 21, 2001.
At any time prior to maturity, the investor may elect to
convert the bond into 4.36 shares of Waste
Management common stock.
Though the issuer may call the LYON immediately
after issuance, the investor does receive some call
protection since the issuer may not call the bond prior
to June 30, 1987 unless the price of the common stock
rises above $86.01.
On issue date, the stock price was $52.125.
67
LYON – Waste Management, Inc. (put prices)
Date Put Price Date Put Price
June 30, 1988 $301.87 June 30, 1995 $613.04
June 30, 1989 $333.51 June 30, 1996 $669.45
June 30, 1990 $375.58 June 30, 1997 $731.06
June 30, 1991 $431.08 June 30, 1998 $798.34
June 30, 1991 $470.75 June 30, 1999 $871.80
June 30, 1993 $514.07 June 30, 2000 $952.03
June 30, 1994 $561.38
68
LYON – Waste Management, Inc. (call prices)
Date Call Price Date Call Price
At issuance $272.50 June 30, 1994 $563.63
June 30, 1986 $297.83 June 30, 1995 $613.04
June 30, 1987 $321.13 June 30, 1996 $669.45
June 30, 1988 $346.77 June 30, 1997 $731.06
June 30, 1989 $374.99 June 30, 1998 $798.34
June 30, 1990 $406.00 June 30, 1999 $871.80
June 30, 1991 $444.08 June 30, 2000 $952.03
June 30, 1992 $477.50 At maturity $1,000.00
June 30, 1993 $518.57
70
Some properties of zero-coupon convertibles
It is most sensitive to interest rate changes since only
par is paid at maturity.
Example
Sunshine Mines issued a convertible bond with a 15-year maturity and an 8.5 percent
coupon, convertible into silver at $20 an ounce.
The issuer is willing to share the potential price appreciation of the underlying
commodity in exchange for a lower coupon rate and better terms in bond
indentures.
73
CrEDITS structure
(Credit Enhanced Debt Indexed To Stock)
• Characteristic
Principal and coupon payments are guaranteed by an irrevocable letter
of credit from a highly rated financial institution.
• Issuer’s perspective
Pay a lower coupon rate. Get the credit guarantee by paying amount
less than the coupon rate differential.
Attraction to investors
Example
Indian Petrochemicals Corporation and GVC (a Taiwanese technology
company)
75
Convertible stock notes
• Instead of paying interest and principal in cash, these notes
pay in common stock or cash, at the issuer’s option
(designed to give issuers flexibility in managing cash
flow).
76
Example
Anacomp - facing bankruptcy in the mid-1980s
• proposed to exchange the convertible 137/8
percent bonds for convertible stock notes with higher
conversion ratio (increased to 250 shares per bond
from 57.143).
79
Financing strategies
Advantage of equity as a source of financing –
excellent insurance properties against financial
distress.
80
Small, fast growing companies
They can transform the high volatility into a benefit since the
warrant is more expensive.
When the company grows, they may call the bonds. This in
turn will strengthen the company’s equity base at the moment
when it is most needed.
81
Convertibles as backdoor
equity financing
Delayed equity
Convertibles provide a way of selling common stock
at a price above the existing market.
They are employed as deferred common stock
financing.
Others 9% 5% 23%
83
Reason(s) for Offering
Neither
Strongly Agree Nor Strongly
My firm chose convertible as its financing source … Disagree Disagree Agree
1 2 3 4 5
a. because of the lower coupon rate versus straight debt. 4.7% 4.7% 4.7% 50.6% 35.5%
b. because management felt that the stock was undervalued
16.9% 14.5% 24.1% 25.3% 19.3%
at the time.
c. because management felt that the stock was overvalued
42.7% 19.5% 31.7% 3.7% 2.4%
at the time.
d. as "delayed equity" financing, expecting that the debt
7.0% 3.5% 5.8% 46.5% 37.2%
would be converted.
e. because the conversion feature provides bondholders with
protection against unfavorable actions by stockholders or 45.1% 20.7% 28.0% 6.1% 0.0%
management.
f. because our investment banker recommended it over
10.7% 8.3% 45.2% 29.8% 6.0%
other forms of financing.
g. because other firms had recently made successful
10.8% 10.8% 33.7% 42.2% 2.4%
convertible offerings.
84
Reasons for Offering (cont’d)
By order of importance, please rank the following factors on a scale of
1 to 6 on the extent to which it influenced your firm’s decision to issue
convertible; 1 = most influential, 2 = next most influential, etc.)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Lower coupon versus straight debt 48.3% 25.0% 13.3% 5.6% 5.6% 1.2%
stock was undervalued, so we couldn't issue equity 15.7% 22.6% 7.8% 11.3% 7.0% 28.0%
Stock was overvalued, so we took the opportunity
to lock in a favorable conversion premium 3.4% 4.8% 2.2% 7.0% 26.8% 52.4%
Firm wished to issue "delayed equity" 22.5% 31.0% 20.0% 12.7% 14.1% 2.4%
Investment banker recommended it 7.9% 4.8% 27.8% 38.0% 18.3% 7.3%
Other firms had recently issued convertible debt successfully 2.20% 11.90% 28.90% 25.40% 28.20% 8.50%
85
Environment in which issuance occurred
1. In retrospect, my firm’s stock was _____ valued around the time
of the convertible debt offering.
under correctly over
1 2 3 Mean Median
46.4% 41.6% 12.0% 1.66 2.00
2. Around the time of the convertible debt offering, my firm’s
management expected future earning to be _____ the market was
expecting.
about the same as much higher than
2 3 4 5 Mean Median
3.6% 49.4% 35.1% 11.9% 3.55 3.00
86
Equity-like returns with less risk
88
Risk-reward relationship
Performance of various asset classes, 1973-1995
89
Insulation from volatility
The price movements of convertibles are generally far less volatile.
90
• Adding convertibles to either bonds or stocks moves the efficient
frontier lower in terms of risk and higher in terms of reward.91
Long term convertible performance
• Over the period for which reliable long-run data are
available (since early 1970s), the total return performance
of US convertibles has virtually replicated that of the
S & P 500, but with significantly lower risk.
• delta < 4%
96
Disadvantages
97