See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/307440179

The golden apple snail pomacea canaliculata: A review on invasion, dispersion

and control

Article  in  Outlooks on Pest Management · August 2016

DOI: 10.1564/v27_aug_03

CITATION READS

1 13,932

2 authors:

Fabiano Brito Ravindra C Joshi

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul University of the South Pacific
10 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION    62 PUBLICATIONS   748 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Invasive species in rice ecosystems. View project

Agriculture in the Pacific Island Countries (PICs) View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Fabiano Brito on 07 September 2016.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL

THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL POMACEA CANALICULATA:  A REVIEW ON

INVASION, DISPERSION AND CONTROL
Fabiano Carvalho de Brito* and Ravindra C. Joshi†, *Pontifícial Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
(PUCRS), Brazil. E-mail: fabiano.brito@acad.pucrs.br, me.fabianobrito@gmail.com, †Visiting Professor, Pampanga
State Agricultural University, Philippines & Research Affiliate, Cordillera Studies Center, University of the
Philippines Baguio, Philippines. E-mail: rcjoshi4@gmail.com, rcjoshi@up.edu.ph

Keywords: Invasive species; rice pest; biological control; biological invasions; tive organic alternative, as some plant products have been
Pomacea canaliculata proven to be effective molluscicides in laboratory trials and
can be cheaper and safer for the environment and human
health than synthetic chemicals.

Apple snail distribution, invasion and damage

After its introduction, rapid dispersal of GAS occurred
throughout East and Southeast Asia. Apart from becoming
a major pest of rice, it induced a decrease in the numbers
of native gastropods in the region (Karraker & Dudgeon,
2014) (Fig 3). The first introduction of Pomacea canalicu-
lata into the USA occurred in 1989 in taro (Colocasia escu-
lenta) fields on Hawaii, where it was reported from 139 sites
on the island of Maui (Lach & Cowie, 1999). However,
Fabiano Carvalho de Brito Ravindra C. Joshi pomacean snails were first introduced in the USA during
the 1950s via the aquarium trade with several different
species becoming established in Florida, North Carolina,
Abstract California, Texas, Georgia, and Arizona (Howells et al.
The golden apple snail (GAS) Pomacea canaliculata is the 2006). Improved species taxonomy and identification has
dominant aquatic gastropod and a major rice pest in many led to more accurate assessments of GAS and its distribution.
Asian countries. We review GAS invasions and synthetic and In its native range in southern Brazil, P. canaliculata has
natural products for its biological and chemical control in become a major pest for pre-germinated rice crops (Fig 4),
wetland agricultural systems. together with other harmful species of gastropods, such as
Physella acuta, Physa marmorata, Biomphalaria tenagophila,
Biomphalaria peregrine. Wetland water, used for rice field
Introduction irrigation allows these snails to invade during irrigation
The freshwater golden apple snail (GAS), Pomacea canal- and heavy rainfall events, and feed on sprouting rice seed-
iculata is endemic to South America (Fig 1). Golden apple
snails were introduced several times in Asia (Hayes et al.,
2008) as a food source and for use in commercial aqua-
culture, but these intended uses were not commercially
successful. Thus, unused specimens of P.canaliculata were
discarded into and rapidly spread through aquatic habitats
(Halwart, 1994) and their release led to them becoming a
major pest in wetland agricultural systems, most particu-
larly as a rice pest (Hickel et al., 2012).
In SE Asia and elsewhere, chemical control of GAS using
molluscicides has been favored due to the immediate results,
but these chemicals are known to be detrimental to the envi-
ronment and human health (Carlsson & Bronmark, 2006).
Some farmers have attempted to remove or destroy the GAS
egg masses (Fig 2) deposited on vegetation as an alternative
to chemical control (Joshi, 2007), whereas in South America
wooden perches have been used to attract snail kites Rosthra-
mus sociabilis as effective predators of the snails. However, Figure 1.  Golden Apple Snail (GAS). (Photo credits: Mr. Fabiano
employment of plant-based molluscicides could be an effec- Carvalho de Brito, PUCRS, Brazil).

DOI: 10.1564/v27_aug_03 O u t l o o k s o n Pe s t M a n a g e m e n t – A u g u s t 2 0 1 6    1 5 7
© 2016 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
 THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL
lings resulting in extensive crop damage (Fig 4). There are no
known registered products for direct control of snail rice pests
in Brazil (Cowie, 2002).
In other Latin American countries, P. canaliculata has
been a danger to rice crops since 2005 particularly the
lowland regions of the Ecuadorian provinces of Guayas
and Los Rios. Surveyed farmers noted that even with heavy
use of the molluscicides, endosuflan and metaldehyde, snail
rice crop damage remained high, especially during the rainy
season. (Rodriguez et al., 2015). However, the predatory snail
kite also increased, leading to an expansion of the snail kite’s
range which had been contracting since the 1970s (Horgan et
al., 2014). Its spread into Mexico can be traced to the release
of GAS into tributaries of the Colorado River by aquarists in
the City of Yuma, Arizona, from which they dispersed down-
stream into Mexican portions of the Colorado River drainage
system (Campos et al., 2013).
In Europe, snail damage has been reported in some Portu-
guese rice fields and in Spain, where rice is grown in the delta
of the River Ebro, where it has been speculated that P. canal-
iculata or P. lineata might also be present (Lopez et al., 2010).
Since its release in Asia, the snail has fed on a wide range
of aquatic plants of economic value, including young rice
seedlings, taro, swamp cabbage, lotus, mat rush, Chinese mat
grass, wild rice, Japanese parsley, water chestnuts, and azolla.
But, by far, the greatest damage occurs in irrigated rice culture,
which provides an ideal environment for GAS dispersal and
growth. Thus, after its invasion and spread through direct
Figure 2.  GAS Egg masses in Direct-Seeded Rice, Eldorado do Sul, release, animal trails or irrigation pipelines, GAS rapidly has
Rio Grande do Sul, December 2015, Brazil. (Photo credits: Ms. Danielle become one of the most damaging rice pests in Asia (Naylor,
Almeida, IRGA, Brazil). 1996).

Fig. 3. GAS Global Distribution. (Photo credits: Mr. Fabiano Carvalho de Brito, PUCRS, Brazil).

1 5 8    O u t l o o k s o n Pe s t M a n a g e m e n t – A u g u s t 2 0 1 6
© 2016 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
 THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL

Table 1.   Global Distribution, Origin, Invasion Pathways, and Year reported of Pomacea spp.

Country Reported Origin Invasion Pathway Year Reported Reference

Alabama Introduced Aquarium trade ? EPPO (2012)
Argentina Native ? ? Hayes et al. (2008)
Arizona Introduced Aquarium trade 2005 Howells et al. (2006)
Australia Introduced Intercepted ? Plant and Health (2009)
California Introduced Aquarium trade ? Howells et al. (2006)
Chile Invasive Dispersion? Before 2008 Letelier & Soto-Acuna (2008)
China Invasive Food consumption 1981-1985 Halwart (1994)
Colombia Introduced ? ? Hayes et al. (2012)
Dominican Republic Introduced Clean fish production ponds 1990/1991 Hayes et al. (2012)
Ecuador Invasive ? 2005 Felix (2011)
Fujian Invasive Food consumption 1985 Mochida (1991)
Georgia Introduced Aquarium trade ? EPPO (2012)
Guangdong Invasive Food consumption 1988 Mochida (1991)
Guangxi Invasive Food consumption ? Halwart (1994)
Hainan Invasive Food consumption ? Lv et al. (2011)
Hawaii Introduced Aquarium trade 1989 Tran et al. (2008)
Hubei Invasive Food consumption ? Lv et al. (2011)
Hunan Invasive Food consumption ? Lv et al. (2011)
Indonesia Introduced Aquarium trade 1981-1984 Mochida (1991)
Iraq Introduced by ships? 2014 Khaled (2015)
Israel Introduced Aquarium trade ? EPPO (2012)
Japan Introduced Food consumption 1981 Mochida (1991)
Jiangxi Invasive Food consumption ? Lv et al. (2011)
Korea, Republic of Introduced Food consumption 1981-1986 Mochida (1991)
Laos PDR Introduced Food consumption 1991-1994 Douangboupha & Khamphoukeo
(2006)
Louisiana Introduced Aquarium trade ? EPPO (2012)
Malaysia Introduced Food consumption 1987 Yahaya et al. (2006)
Mexico Invasive ? 2013 Campos et al. (2013)
Myanmar Invasive ? ? Hayes et al. (2008)
Pakistan Introduced Aquarium trade 2012 Baloch (2012)
Papua New Guinea Introduced ? 1990-1993 Halwart & Bartley (2006)
Philippines Introduced Food consumption 1980-1982 Mochida (1991)
Sabah Introduced Food consumption 1992 Teo (2004)
Sarawak Introduced Food consumption 1987 Mochida (1991)
Shanghai Invasive Food consumption ? Lv et al. (2011)
Sichuan Invasive Food consumption ? Lv et al. (2011)
Singapore Introduced ? 1993 Cowie (2002)
South Carolina Introduced Aquarium trade ? EPPO (2012)
Spain Introduced ? 2009 Anonymous (2011)
Suriname Invasive Aquarium trade 2006 Wiryareja & Tjoe-Awie (2006)
Taiwan Introduced Food consumption 1979-1981 Mochida (1991)
Thailand Introduced Food consumption 1982-1990 Mochida (1991)
Uruguay Native ? ? Hayes et al. (2008)
USA Introduced Aquarium trade ? Howells et al. (2006)
Vietnam Introduced Food consumption around 1988 Cuong (2006)
Yunnan Invasive Food consumption ? Lv et al. (2011)
Zhejiang Invasive Food consumption 1985 Mochida (1991)
? -Information lacking.

Invasive aquatic invertebrates can have high negative into currently uninfested countries. Hence, there is a need for
environmental impacts, but their management is still less well management practices adapted to local conditions (Cowie,
developed than for other taxa such as mammals or birds. It 2002).
is estimated that aquatic invertebrates account for approxi- It is estimated that damage caused by invasions of inva-
mately 24% of all environmental economic impacts (Pysek & sive species were costing the United States, United Kingdom,
Richardson, 2010). The degree of these impacts may increase Australia, South Africa, India and Brazil more than $ 314
as Ampullariid snail populations continue to expand further billion per year (Pimentel et al., 2001). Quantifying the nega-

O u t l o o k s o n Pe s t M a n a g e m e n t – A u g u s t 2 0 1 6    1 5 9
© 2016 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
 THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL
some cost, there is evidence that it has been effective in some
Asian and southern Latin American countries (IRGA, 2010).
A number of different, fish will eat snails, including
the African catfish (Clarias gariepinus) and common carp
(Cyprinus carpio), but the latter was more adaptable to vari-
ous different farming environments (Teo, 2006). Hence, the
common carp is the recommended fish species of choice for
controlling GAS in rice culture at a density of 10 fish/plot or
2041 fish/ha. Apart from being an alternative to using mollus-
cicides, the deployment of carp can provide additional income
for farmers. Halwart et al. (2014) studied the efficacy of fish
predators for control of GAS in transplanted rice during
dry and wet seasons. They showed that common carp were
able to suppress snail populations by 58–87% compared to
Fig. 4. GAS damage as cut leaves in Direct-Seeded Rice, Eldorado 48–87% by Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) both being
do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, December 2015, Brazil. (Photo credits: Ms. greater than occurred in no-fish plots. However, neither fish
Danielle Almeida, IRGA, Brazil). species could completely prevent infestation by more mature
snails with larger shell sizes.
The treatment of GAS eggs with the parasitic fungus Paecilo-
tive impacts of these invasive species is difficult and complex myces lilacinus led to 100% mortality of 1 day old juvenile
as the knowledge required to assess the impacts of many snails, susceptible to the conidia and only 12% of eggs hatched in
taxa at regional scales is still scarce. Certainly, managing P. contrast to 100% in controls (Maketon et al., 2009). However,
canaliculata damage has become very expensive. Published juvenile snails became increasingly less susceptible to the enzy-
data on GAS damage appears to have been grossly underesti- matic activity of the fungus with increasing age and maturity,
mated. An estimated annual loss due to crop damage by non- limiting its use as a biological control agent. In another labo-
indigenous species in Southeast Asian countries translates to ratory study Salcedo (2013) evaluated the pathogenicity of the
about $33.5 billion of total damage including that to agricul- nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and showed that the
ture, the environment and public health. The total estimated inoculation of up to 16,000 nematodes per snail leads to 100%
damage caused by GAS in Southeast Asian countries is $1.47 snail mortality in 96 h.
billion annually. In Southeast Asian countries such as Brunei, Current biological control with fish seems to be the most
Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philip- promising option for sustainable GAS management. However,
pines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam, the estimates are biocontrol must be complemented with other methods such
probably conservative as they do not include damage to the as lowering water levels or draining the rice field. Draining
environment or human health (Nghiem, 2013). will not kill GAS because they are able to survive long peri-
ods of desiccation. GAS move only in standing water and are
immobile at depths less than half of their shell height, thus
Golden apple snail biological control periodic draining of the fields to a depth of 1 cm is a very
The most effective method to control snails relates to effective control practice because it prevents the specimens of
crop establishment. For instance, transplanted 20-day-old P. canaliculata from moving and feeding (Wada, 2004). The
seedlings are better able to withstand snail damage than field should be well levelled and maintained at saturation,
13-day-old transplanted seedlings or direct-seeded rice. minimizing the time it contains standing water. Farmers with
Seedlings more than 30-days-old are more tolerant to snail their own pumps can manage water levels better than those
damage than younger seedlings. served by large irrigation systems.
Over the past 15 years, a number of options for P. canal-
iculata biological control have emerged. The fire ant Solenop-
sis geminata consumed P. canaliculata eggs in Philippine field Chemical control
experiments in spite of the fact that the eggs are considered While plant components are natural and socially and envi-
toxic to most animals (Dreon et al., 2014). Although another ronmentally acceptable, they are not necessarily non-toxic.
ant (Pheidologeton spp.) has also been reported to consume Several plants have active ingredients that could be potential
GAS eggs (Yusa, 2006), further studies are needed to confirm biodegradable molluscicides, including saponins, flavonoids,
the impact of ants. The relative absence of natural predators steroids, tannins, and other secondary metabolites (Valverde
has allowed the rapid establishment and growth of GAS popu- et al., 2010).
lations soon after their introduction to an un-infested habitat. Huang et al (2003) exposed specimens of P. canaliculata
Ducks have been extensively used to control P. canalicu- to powder extracts of soap nut pericarp from Sapindus muko-
lata in both transplanted and direct-seeded rice culture, but rossi (Sapindaceae) and attained LC50 values of 85, 22, and 17
with variable results, depending on the race of the ducks as ppm after treating for 24, 48, and 72h, respectively. Bioassay
well as the time of release. The effective number of ducks experiments with a new acetylated triterpene saponin, hedera-
required is estimated to be around 5–10 ducks per hectare, genin, comparing it to niclosamide and metaldehyde revealed
with results being more favorable in transplanted rather than that all of the isolated saponins exhibited molluscicidal effects
direct-seeded rice (Teo, 2001). While this strategy entails against P. canaliculata. Niclosamide (0.8 mgL-1) exposure

1 6 0    O u t l o o k s o n Pe s t M a n a g e m e n t – A u g u s t 2 0 1 6
© 2016 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
 THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL

Table 2.  Effectiveness of the Biological (Botanicals and Natural Enemies) Control Agents against Pomacea spp.

Botanical Name Active Compound/Substance Effective Concentration Reference

Sapindus mukorossi Hederagenina (Saponin) 85 mg l-1 , 22 mg l-1 , and 17 mg l-1 in 24, Huang et al. (2003)
48, and 72h, respectively

Artemisia douglasiana Vulgarone B (Sesquiterpene) 50 mg l-1 Joshi et al. (2005)

Chenopodium quinoa Saponins from husk 33-54 mg l-1 San Martin et al. (2008)

Azadirachta indica Aqueous extracts from leaves (LC 50) 142.75 mg l-1 Venturini et al. (2008)

Chenopodium chinoa Quinoa Saponins 9, 11 and 13 mg l-1 (ovicidal effects in 1-5 Joshi et al. (2008)
day old )

Oldenlandia affinis and Viola odorata Cyclotides 150-300 µ/ml Plan et al. (2008)

Chenopodium quinoa Alkali modified Quinoa Saponins 30 mg l-1 in 36h San Martin et al. (2009)

Nerium indicum Cardiac Glycosides (LC 50) 3.71mg l-1 in 96 h

Dai et al. (2011)

Azadiractha indica Dried seed extracts (LC 50) 500 mg l-1 in 96 h Latip et al. (2013)

Fresh seed extracts (LC 50) 267.96 mg l-1 in 96 h

Oryza sativa Rice husk based on activated 0.034 U/ml to disrupt the hatching process Salleh et al. (2013)
carbon

Sapindus saponaria, Solanum Extracts containing alkaloids, (LC 50)17.8 mg l-1 and 24.04 mg l-1 Manzano et al. (2014)
mammosum and Jatropha curcas phenols, tannins and saponins

Ilex paraguariensis St.-Hil Extracts of unripe fruits (LC 50) 26 mg l-1 in a 16 h Brito (2015)

Natural Enemies Zoological Name Stage of Pomacea spp. Consumed Reference

Ants Solenopsis geminata Predates on Egg masses Yusa (2001)
Pheidologeton spp.

Long-horned grasshoppers Conocephalus longipennis Predates on Egg masses Joshi (2001)

Conocephalus maculatus Joshi (2001)

Ducks:Varieties: Mallard, William – Predates on Juveniles and Sub-adults Teo (2001)

Siam, Taiwan, Peking, Cherry Valley,
Muscovy and Khaki Campbell

Study covered 46 species in 16 Macrobrachium formosense, Predates on Juveniles and Sub-adults Yusa (2006; 2014)
orders: Crayfishes, Dragonfly Tribolodon hakonensis and Zacco
larvae, Diving beetles, freshwater temmincki
fishes, Carp and turtles

Fish: Common carp Cyprinus carpio Predates on Juveniles and Sub-adults Ichinose et al. (2002)

Fishes: Common carp and African Cyprinus carpio and Clarias gariepinus Predates on Juveniles and Sub-adults Teo (2006)
catfish

Fish: Pearl cichlid Geophagus brasiliensis Predates on Juveniles and Sub-adults Silva & Figueiredo (2014)

Fishes: common and black carps Cyprinus carpio and Predates on Juveniles and Sub-adults Qiu et al. (2014)
Mylopharyngodon piceus

Fishes: Nile tilapia and Common Oreochromis niloticus and Cyprinus Predates on Juveniles and Sub-adults Halwart et al. (2014)
carp carpio

Fungi Paecilomyces lilacinus Parasitism by killed newly-hatched juvenile Maketon et al. (2009)
snails
Nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Inoculations septicemia Salcedo (2013)

O u t l o o k s o n Pe s t M a n a g e m e n t – A u g u s t 2 0 1 6    1 6 1
© 2016 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
 THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL
yielded an 85% mortality rate while that of metaldehyde (20 and Sebastian, L.S. (Eds.), Global Advances in Ecology and
ppm) was 40%. Likewise, the soap nut powder of pericarp Management of Golden Apple Snails, Nueva Ecija: Philippine
extracts (4ppm) displayed 62% mortality to GAS in paddy Rice Research Institute, pp. 73–112.
fields (Huang et al., 2003). These results showed that both Horgan, F.G., Felix, M.I., Portalanza, D.E., Sanchez, L., Moya Rios,
W.M., Farah, S.E., Wither, J.A., Andrade, C.I., Espin, E.B., 2014.
isolated saponins and crude soap nut extract express mollus-
Responses by farmers to the apple snail invasion of Ecuador’s
cicidal activity against P. canaliculata. However, at present, rice fields and attitudes toward predatory snail kites. Crop
farmers appear to prefer the use of conventional pesticides Protection. 62, 135–143.
as none of the botanical molluscicides identified has been Huang, H.C., Liao, S.C., Chang, F.R., Kuo, Y.H., Wu, Y.C., 2003.
produced commercially (Joshi, 2007). Molluscicide saponins from Sapindus mukorossi, inhibitory
agents of golden apple snails, Pomacea canaliculata. Journal of
Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 51, 4916–4919.
Conclusion IRGA, 2010. Instituto Riograndense do Arroz: Cresce o número
The Invasive Species Compendium (CABI, 2014) contains de marrecos de Pequim na lavoura de arroz. http://www.irga.
extensive information on world-wide GAS invasions, establish- rs.gov.br/conteudo/2560/cresce-o-numero-de-marrecos-de-
ment and damage. Extensive documented evidence suggests pequim-na-lavoura-de-arroz-
Joshi, R.C., 2007. Problems with the management of the golden
that its capacity for damage to invaded wetland agricultural
apple snail Pomacea canaliculata: an important exotic pest of
systems should not be underestimated, as its range continues to rice in Asia. In: Vreysen, M.J.B., Robinson, A.S., Hendrichs, J.,
expand with invasions throughout Asia (Joshi, 2007). The total (Eds.), Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests, Springer Netherlands,
cost of managing GAS amounts to more than $ 1200 million p.257–264.
annually. This review of alternative methodologies to control Karraker, N.E., Dudgeon D., 2014. Invasive apple snails (Pomacea
damage by pest snails in wetland agriculture shows that the canaliculata) are predators of amphibians in South China.
impact of various biological control systems examined in the Biological Invasions. 16, 1785–1789.
laboratory need to be studied more fully under field conditions Lach, L., Cowie, R., 1999. The spread of the introduced freshwater
before they can be widely used to control GAS. apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) (Gastropoda:
Ampullariidae) on O‘ahu, Hawai‘i. Bishop Museum Occasional
Papers., 58, 66–71.
Lopez, M.A., Altaba, C.R., Andree, K.B., Lopez, V., 2010. First
References
invasion of the apple snail Pomacea insularum in Europe.
CABI, 2014. Invasive Species Compendium. Datasheets, maps,
Tentacle – The Newsletter of the IUCN/SSC Mollusk Specialist
images, abstracts and full text on invasive species of the world.
Group. 18, 26–28.
http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/68490
Maketon, M., Suttichart, K., Domhom, J., 2009. Effective control
Campos, E., Ruiz-Campos, G., Delgadillo, J., 2013. First record
of invasive apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata Lamarck) using
of the exotic apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Gastropoda:
Paecilomyces lilacinus (Thom) Samson. Malacologia. 51(1),
Ampullariidae) in Mexico, with remarks on its spreading in the
181–190.
Lower Colorado River. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 84
Naylor, R., 1996. Invasions in agriculture: Assessing the cost of the
(2), 671–675.
golden apple snail in Asia. Ambio. 25 (7), 443–448.
Carlsson, N.O.L., Bronmark, C., 2006. Size-dependent effects
Nghiem, L.T.P., Soliman, T., Yeo, D.C.J., Tan, H.T.W., Evans, T.A.,
of an invasive herbivorous snail (Pomacea canaliculata) on
Mumford, J.D., 2013. Economic and environmental impacts of
macrophytes and periphyton in Asian wetlands. Freshwater
harmful non-indigenous species in Southeast Asia. PLoS ONE
Biology. 51, 695–704.
8(8): e71255. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071255
Cowie, R.H., 2002. Apple snails (Ampullariidae) as agricultural
Pimentel, D., McNair, S., Janecka, J., Wightman, J., Simmonds,
pests: their biology, impacts and management. In: Barker, G.M.
C., O’Connell, E., Wong, L., Russel, J., Zern, T., Aquino, T.,
(Ed.), Molluscs as Crop Pests. CABI. International, Wallingford,
Tsomondo, T., 2001. Economic and environmental threats
UK, pp. 145–189.
of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions. Agriculture,
Dreon, M.S., Fernández, P.E, Gimeno, E.J., Heras, H. 2014. Insights
Ecosystems and Environment. 84, 1–20.
into embryo defenses of the invasive apple snail Pomacea
Pysek, P., Richardson, D.M., 2010. Invasive species, environmental
canaliculata: Egg mass ingestion affects rat intestine morphology
change and management, and health. Annual Review of
and growth. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 8 (6), 1–10.
Environment and Resources. 35, 25–55.
Halwart, M., 1994. The golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata
Rodriguez, M.C., Rodriguez, G.M.C., Burgos, J.A., Robles, L.,M.
in Asian rice farming systems: present impact and future threat.
2015. Pomacea canaliculata Plaga del Arroz en Ecuador.
International Journal of Pest Management. 40 (2), 199–206.
Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas. Comission Editorial de la
Halwart, M., Litsinger, J.A., Viray, M.C., Kaule, G., 2014. Efficacy of
Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas, ESPE.
common carp and nile tilapia as biocontrol agents of the golden
Salcedo, G.A., 2013. Acción patogénica de Heterorhabditis
apple snail in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science. 143
bacteriophora (Poinar) sobre el caracol manzana (Pomacea
(2), 25–136.
canaliculata Lamarck), plaga de los cultivos de arroz (Oriza
Hayes, K.A., Joshi, R.C., Thiengo, S.C., Cowie, R.H., 2008. Out
sativa) en la cuenca baja del río Daule, Guayas, Ecuador. Avances
of South America: Multiple origins of non-native apple snails in
en Investigación Agropecuaria. 17(2), 53–56.
Asia. Diversity and Distributions. 14(4), 701–712.
Teo, S.S., 2001. Evaluation of different duck varieties for the control
Hickel, E.R., K.K. Scheuermann, D.S. Eberhardt. 2012. Manejo de
of the golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) in transplanted
caramujos em lavouras de arroz irrigado, em sistema de cultivo
and direct seeded rice. Crop Protection. 20(7), 599–604.
pré-germinado. Agropecuária Catarinense. 25 (1), 54–57.
Teo, S.S., 2006. Evaluation of different species of fish for biological
Howells, R.G., Burlakova, L.E., Karatayev, A.Y., Marfurt. R.K.,
control of golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) in
Burks, R.L., 2006. Native and introduced Ampullaridae in
rice. Crop Protection. 25, 1004–1012.
North America: History, status and ecology. In: Joshi, R.C.,

1 6 2    O u t l o o k s o n Pe s t M a n a g e m e n t – A u g u s t 2 0 1 6
© 2016 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com
 THE GOLDEN APPLE SNAIL
Valverde, A.L., Silva-Souza, N., Marques, A.M., Cantanhede,
S.P., 2010. Atividade moluscicida de plantas: uma alternative Ravindra C. Joshi is currently a Technical Advisor on rice apple snail to DELTAMED
profilática. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy. 20(2), 282–288. (Asociación de Deltas del Mediterráneo) España, Francia, Italia, Rumania, Egipto,
Wada, T., 2004. Strategies for controlling the apple snail Pomacea Grecia, Vietnam, Argentina i Brasil; and Visiting Professor, Adjunct Professor of
canaliculata (Lamarck) (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae) in Japanese Agriculture, and Research Affiliate, with Pampanga State Agricultural Univer-
direct-sown paddy fields. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly. sity, Philippines, University of South Pacific, Fiji, and Cordillera Studies Center,
38(2), 75–80. University of the Philippines-Baguio, Philippines, respectively. He is a Fellow of
Yusa, Y., 2006. Predators of the introduced apple snail, Pomacea the Royal Society of Biology and Royal Entomological Society, UK. His research
canaliculata (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae): their effectiveness and focuses on a variety of family food and nutrition related issues, including the
utilization in biological control. In: Joshi, R.C., and Sebastian, impacts of agriculturally important invasive species, climate change, and biodi-
L.S. (Eds.), Global Advances In Ecology and Management of versity conservation in Asia, Africa and the Pacific.
Golden Apple Snail, Nueva Ecija: Philippine Rice Research
Institute, pp.345–361. Fabiano Carvalho de Brito is a biologist graduate in Pontifícial Catholic University
of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Brazil, having master’s degree in Zoology with
emphasis in Animal Physiology in Pontifícial Catholic University of Rio Grande
do Sul (PUCRS), where he investigated the chemical control rice pest snail
Pomacea canaliculata through the use of fractions obtained from unripe fruits of
yerba mate (Ilex paraguariensis). He is currently pursuing a doctorate in ecology
(bioindication) on the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS, Brazil.

Similar articles that appeared in Outlooks on Pest Management include – 2004 15(5) 229;
2005 16(1) 23

New Frontiers in Crop Research

Thursday 20 October 2016
SCI, London, UK
This conference will provide updates in many exciting areas of
crop research, including projects underway within the BBSRC
funded research-industry clubs. The event also aims to foster
the interdisciplinary networking essential to innovation in the
agri-food sector focused on enhancing crop yields, quality and
sustainability.
This event is designed to appeal to academic and industrial
scientists involved in all aspects of crop research, and other
stakeholders interested in catching up on the latest developments.
Call for Posters
Offers to present posters (A0: 1189 mm x 841 mm, portrait) with
or without an optional one slide 3 minute flash presentation
should be sent with a 300 word abstract indicating title, authors
and affiliations to conferences@soci.org with the following
subject: ‘Crop Research Frontiers - Poster Submission’ by
Friday 19 August 2016.

Early Bird deadline: 2 September 2016

Register today!
E: conferences@soci.org
T: +44 (0)20 7598 1561
www.soci.org/events
O u t l o o k s o n Pe s t M a n a g e m e n t – A u g u s t 2 0 1 6    1 6 3
© 2016 Research Information Ltd. All rights reserved. www.pestoutlook.com

View publication stats