P-435
Anisotropic Depth Imaging of Heera Panna Bassein
                                – An interpretive case study
               Deepak Sareen, Parul Pandit*, A.Kavitha, C.M. Varadrajan, S.K. Das, ONGC
Summary
A significant variation within the Miocene sequences was observed in the producing wells in the southern Heera - Panna-
Bassein block of Mumbai Offshore Basin. An area of approximately 890 sq. km was identified for velocity modelling and
depth imaging. The area is having maximum occurrences of patchy carbonates, amplitude anomalies, velocity anomalies and
pseudo structures. Migration algorithms dealing with imaging are not able to handle the depth conversion issues accurately.
Imaging becomes more challenging when high density and high velocity formations are present.
It has been shown that anisotropic PSDM (APSDM) outputs are better positioned than conventional depth imaging outputs.
APSDM incorporates accurate imaging as well as depth positioning. The methodology to incorporate anisotropy (Thomson,
1986) has been illustrated by taking examples from Mumbai offshore area. Integrated analysis of 3D seismic data, well logs,
well markers and VSP data including geological inputs has been carried out to understand the depositional framework.
Keywords: Thomson’s Parameters (Epsilon and delta)
Introduction                                                      Objective of the study
The area of study is located in the southern Heera-Panna-         This study was aimed to map actual velocity variation
Bassein (HPB) block of Mumbai Offshore Basin (Fig.                associated with relatively thin and patchy Miocene
1). This block, positioned in the east of Mumbai                  carbonates (Fig. 2).
High/Platform and south of Surat Depression, has three
distinct N-S to NW-SE trending tectonic units which lose          Miocene Carbonates, occurring in patches affect the
their identity in Miocene. The western block is a composite       structural disposition and reflection responses of deeper
high block dissected by a number of small grabens. The            levels. It has been found that these sporadic depositions lead
Central graben is a syn sedimentary sink during Paleogene         to the incorrect depth values. The Miocene carbonates are
and Early Neogene. The eastern block is a gentle eastward         having higher velocities than enclosing shale. Because of
rising homocline.                                                 lateral and temporal variation in velocities at shallower
                                                                  levels, pseudo structures are created at deeper levels. As a
The facies distribution and the depositional setting of the       result the success ratio decreases for the placement of
Miocene carbonates in the HPB area indicates development          production wells within the reservoir.
of carbonate facies in structurally higher area and
alternations of carbonate/shale in the lows and graben area
(Mishra et al, 2011).
                                            GEOPIC, ONGC, Dehradun. India.
                                              parul1611pandit@gmail.com
                         Anisotropic Depth Imaging of Heera Panna Bassein
                                     - An interpretive case study
                                                                 Fig. 2: RMS amplitude map where dark blue patches indicate
                                                                 sporadic depositions of high density high velocity Miocene
                                                                 carbonates.
                                                                 Analytical Framework
Fig. 1: Tectonic map of Western Mumbai Offshore Basin (after
Pandey et al., 1998).                                            Most of the crustal rocks are anisotropic in nature. This is
                                                                 mainly due to fracturing, layering and complex crystal
The study area is characterized by massive shale (Backus,        structure of rocks Imaging addresses the proper focusing
1962) around 800-1000m underlain by thick limestone -            and lateral positioning of reflectors, but does not result in a
shale alternations. The anisotropic behaviour of shale is        true depth data set, even if depth migration is used (Al-
well established. Thus, an anisotropic approach was utilized     Chalabi,1994; Schultz,1999).Even in totally isotropic
to evolve a reliable depth image, high resolution                media, therefore, unless well data are incorporated into the
velocity volume and to address depth conversion issues           velocity model (Alkhalifah & Tsvankin, 1995), there will
in the southern HPB block.                                       probably be misties - especially due to the tendency of
                                                                 picking towards higher side to discriminate against
                                                                 multiples.
                  Fig. 3: Definition of Anisotropic Parameters
                                                                                                                              2
                         Anisotropic Depth Imaging of Heera Panna Bassein
                                     - An interpretive case study
Estimation of Anisotropic Parameters (δ, ε, V0a)
The anisotropic parameters include anisotropic interval
velocity, Epsilon and Delta which are Thomson’s
Parameters (Thomson, 1986). For the estimation of delta,
picked time migrated (TM) Maps along dominant reflectors
are scaled to depth maps.
The delta (δ) is calculated according to the following
relationship (Tsvankin, 2001):
              δ = ½ [{∆Z I / ∆Z A} 2 -1]
          I
where ∆Z is isotropy layer thickness (measured from the
structural model or from the top horizon map to bottom)
                                                               Fig. 4: Isotropic interval velocity volume v/s anisotropic interval
which is
                                                               velocity volume.
∆Z I (Formation1) = Formation1 bottom -Formation1 top
                                                               After incorporation of anisotropic parameters a
and ∆Z A is anisotropy layer thickness (measured from the      better interval velocity volume was obtained (Fig 4).The
well time - depth pairs log between T1 and T2 or top           velocity variation due to presence of Miocene carbonates
horizon marker to bottom).(Fig. 3)                             is clearly visible in the volume. APSDM was executed
                                                               taking the estimated anisotropic parameters as input.
Epsilon can be derived from Eta analysis for far offsets but   Subsequently the depth section shows much improved
small inaccuracy in Eta may lead to a big inaccuracy           match with the well tops (Fig 5, Fig.6, Fig 7).
in Epsilon. Thus, as a guess value we can begin with
setting, δ(delta) equivalent to ε (Epsilon).
                       δ =ε
The isotropic Interval Velocity (V0) is scaled with delta
volume to create Anisotropic Interval Velocity (V0a) based
on following relation ((Tsvankin, 2001)):
                V0a = V0 /(1+2δ) 1/2
Application
The APSDM method described above has been applied to
3D seismic reflection offshore data. The target zone under
study is a reservoir located in Heera-Panna-Bassein block of
Mumbai Offshore Basin.
                                                                                                                                3
                            Anisotropic Depth Imaging of Heera Panna Bassein
                                        - An interpretive case study
                                                                        Fig. 8: The gather flatness displaying the QC of isotropic
                                                                        interval velocity volume v/s anisotropic interval velocity
                                                                        volume.
Fig. 7: Isotropic depth section v/s anisotropic depth section passing
through Well A, B and C.
The QC of interval velocity has been provided in Fig 8.The
flat gathers and improved image validates the accuracy of
anisotropic interval velocity volume over isotropic interval
velocity volume.
Moreover the compatibility of Sonic Log                   with the
anisotropic interval velocity model validates            the same
(Fig9).Fig. 10 shows the flowchart to estimate           the values     Fig. 9: Compatibility of Sonic Log (Pink color) with the
of anisotropic parameters using Anisotropic              Pre stack      updated interval velocity (Blue color)
depth migration.
                                                                                                                                4
                       Anisotropic Depth Imaging of Heera Panna Bassein
                                   - An interpretive case study
                                                       Conclusion
                                                       The utility of true depth imaging using Anisotropic
                                                       Approach has been demonstrated in the present study. It
                                                       has been found that data from most of the wells are in
                                                       agreement with well markers at major horizons. The ratio of
                                                       success in well matching is quite high. Thus the
                                                       deliverables including anisotropic velocity volume and
                                                       PSDM gathers are highly amiable for structural modeling,
                                                       inversion and attribute analysis.
                                                       References
                                                       Al-khalifah, T. and Tsvankin, I., 1995, Velocity analysis for
                                                       transversely isotropic media; Geophysics, 60, 150-1556.
                                                       Backus, G.E.,1962, Long-wave elastic anisotropy produced by
                                                       horizontal layering; J. Geophysical Res., 67, 4427-4440.
                                                       Haskey,P., Faragher,J. R.,Raymondi, M. J. Dangerfield,
                                                       J.A. and Fjeld, O., 1998,Embla: An interpretive case
                                                       history: Depth Imaging with well controlled signal
                                                       estimation, 68th Annual International Mtg. Society of
                                                       Exploration Geophysicists, 1174-1177.
                                                       Kosloff, D., Sherwood J., Koren, Z., Machet, E., and
                                                       Falkovitz,   Y.,    Velocity  and    interface  depth
                                                       determination by tomography of depth migrated gathers;
                                                       Geophysics, 61, 1511-1523.
                                                       Mishra, J.,Singh, G., Paul, R.,Rath, B. K.,Phukan,
                                                       R.K.,2011.Facies Analysis of Early Miocene Bombay
                                                       Formation in Panna-Bassein-Heera area, Mumbai Offshore
                                                       Basin. The 2nd South Asain Geoscience Conference and
                                                       Exhibition, GEOIndia2011, New Delhi, India
                                                       Pandey, J., and A. Dave, 1998, Stratigraphy of the Indian
                                                       Petroliferous Basins: Presidential address presented at XVI
                                                       Indian     Colloq.on    Micropaleontology      Stratigraphy,
                                                       Goa, India.
                                                       Thomsen, L.,1986, Weak elastic anisotropy; Geophysics,
                                                       51, 1954-1966.
Fig. 10: A flow chart showing the workflow of APSDM.
                                                       Tsvankin, I., 2001, Seismic signatures and analysis of
                                                       reflection data in anisotropic media: Elsevier Science, Inc.
                                                                                                                  5
                        Anisotropic Depth Imaging of Heera Panna Bassein
                                    - An interpretive case study
Acknowledgment
The authors place on record their sincere thanks to Director
(Exploration), ONGC, for his kind permission to publish
this work. Valuable interactions with Sh. Vidyasagar
from IRS, Ahemdabad are duly acknowledged. Thanks
are due to Shri C. B. Yadava, CG (S), GEOPIC,
ONGC for valuable discussions. They also acknowledge
Mrs. Sunita Kashyap and Mr. M. M. Pandey for the system
support. The views expressed in this work are solely of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of ONGC.