0% found this document useful (0 votes)
228 views24 pages

Satya Ranjan Sahoo

Tata Steel implemented a Contractor Safety Management System (CSMS) to improve safety practices among contractors at its Kalinganagar plant. The CSMS involved a 6 step process: 1) contractor selection, 2) contract preparation, 3) contract award, 4) orientation and training, 5) managing work, and 6) periodic evaluation. Initial assessments found deficiencies in implementing safety requirements and engaging contractors. Tata Steel then took actions like classifying contracts, requiring job hazard analyses, strengthening pre-work meetings and training, and instituting periodic evaluations to improve contractor safety management and address initial challenges. The CSMS process and practices have resulted in 100% safety training and improved communication, oversight and safety culture among contractors.

Uploaded by

Muneer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
228 views24 pages

Satya Ranjan Sahoo

Tata Steel implemented a Contractor Safety Management System (CSMS) to improve safety practices among contractors at its Kalinganagar plant. The CSMS involved a 6 step process: 1) contractor selection, 2) contract preparation, 3) contract award, 4) orientation and training, 5) managing work, and 6) periodic evaluation. Initial assessments found deficiencies in implementing safety requirements and engaging contractors. Tata Steel then took actions like classifying contracts, requiring job hazard analyses, strengthening pre-work meetings and training, and instituting periodic evaluations to improve contractor safety management and address initial challenges. The CSMS process and practices have resulted in 100% safety training and improved communication, oversight and safety culture among contractors.

Uploaded by

Muneer
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Tata Steel Kalinganagar-

Contractor Safety Management


System (CSMS)
Presentation by : Mr. Satya Ranjan Sahoo

1
About TATA Steel -Kalinganagar

2
Challenges

 Reluctant to adopt safety culture


 Unaware of industrial safety practices
 Difficult to implement basic mandatory PPEs
 Rehabilitation and social welfare
 Quality medical facility
 Competent people for the right job

3
Safety Strategy – The Priorities

Tata Steel Identified Six (6) Core Strategies:


 (Safety) Leadership Development
 Organizational Safety Competency and Capability Improvement
 Contractor Safety Management
 Road and Rail Safety Risk Management
 PSM, Integrated Emergency Response, Infrastructure Integrity
Management
 Occupational Health / Industrial Hygiene (OH/IH)

4
Contractor
Selection

Contract
Preparation

Contract
Award
Introduction to
CSMS
Orientation
and Training

Managing
the Work

Periodic
Evaluation

5
From our Managing Director ….message to all stake holders

“Safety should be
the core value not
a metrics”

Mr T V Narendran
Managing Director,
Tata Steel India & SEA
Implementation of CSM at Kalinganagar

Our Approach

 Study of contracts and gap analysis to find out the gaps for adopting
six step process.
 Workshop for proprietors and senior management team of Tata Steel.
 Training programs were organised along with vendor partners and
departmental representatives.
 Identification of CA (Contract Administrator) & CO (Contract Owner)
for each contract.
 Identification of 148 high risk vendors already awarded the contract.
 Engaging expert agency for cross calibration in assessment process.
 Reward and consequence management for vendor partners

7
Assessment of Maturity level ( 2 on a scale of 0-4)

Contractor Selection
 To define the optimum number of contracting companies
 A capability review of vendors registered before the start / launch of
CSMS

Contractor preparation
 To start Pre-bid and Pre-award meetings in all areas
 To define potentially high risk contractor

Contract Award
 Categorisation of Contracts to be done to focus on roles and
responsibilities of Supervisors
 Ensure pre-work meetings before the start of a job

8
Assessment of Maturity level ( 2 on a scale of 0-4)

Managing the work


 To review the adequacy and appropriateness of adopted processes
 To verify General Safety Clauses and job specific safety requirements by line
walk.
 “One man - One lock" principle in positive isolation for contractor employees.
Training and communication
 Training to contractor supervisors on key hazards and control measures.
 To check the effectiveness of tool box meetings
 Display of safety dash board and
 Emergency contact number at key locations
Periodic Evaluation
 IT intervention for CSM process
 Mentoring of vendors getting poor rating in star rating evaluation.
 Recognition to vendors having good safety management system

9
Step 1: Contractor Selection

OFIs
 Classification of contracts was not in place.
 Process of selecting the right vendor partner was not of importance.
 Past safety record and their performance was not taken into consideration while
registering a vendor.
 No restriction for registration of new vendors.

Actions
 Classification of contract into different categories.
 Framing of evaluation team
 Conducting nos. of work shop
 Vendor partners evaluation of existing vendors.
 The evaluation report with OFIs.
 Assigning mentor to each contract.

10
Step-2: Contract Preparation

OFIs
 Single point departmental accountability for
each was not established.
 JHA (Job hazard analysis) was not in place
for each high risk activity.
 Specific safety requirements were not
identified in the contract.

Actions

 IT intervention to identify the risk category by the department.


 Carrying out JHA or prepare SOP for each activity prior to service request.
 Mentioning Generic & Specific safety clauses in the RFQ (request for
quotation).

11
Step-3: Contract Award

OFIs
 In consistent Pre-bid and pre-work meeting.
 Competent vendor partners with the past experience evaluation were not
consistent.
 High risk jobs were not dealt separately.

Actions

 Pre-bid, Pre-work meetings were made


mandatory.
 Review of vendor proposed safe systems of
work and safety plan.
 Obtaining declaration from vendor partners
before contract award.

12
Step-4: Orientation and training
OFIs:
 Safety orientation training for workers was not
adequate for the job.
 Skill level of workers working in hazardous areas
was not consistent.
Actions:
 Full fledged safety training centre
 Structured training for vendor partner’s employees and supervisors separately
 Behaviour based safety training third party
 First-Aider training by Certification agencies
 Behaviour safety training by third party was undertaken.
 Internal auditor training for OHSAS certification by Class A vendor supervisors
 Job specific safety training/SOP, safety standards training by line manager.

13
Step-5: Managing the work
OFIs :
 Involvement of vendor partner’s proprietors and supervisors in safety audits
review meetings was poor.
 Competency of safe supervisors not adequately addressed.
 Hiding injuries and near miss incidents by vendor partners.
 Motivation of vendor partner’s employees for safe practices.

Actions :
 Contractor AIC (Area Implementation Committee)
was formed in each depts. and vendors having
good performance in safety made the chairman.
 Weekly severity based safety audit by CA/COs,
vendors site and safety supervisor.
 Proprietor line walks along with line manager

14
 Qualification and experience of site supervisor was made mandatory.
 Daily Tool box meetings and periodic mass meetings made mandatory in each
depts.
 Conducting JCC (Job cycle check), preparing SOP (standard operating
procedure) & JHA (Job hazard analysis).
 Incident and near miss reporting and root cause analysis by vendor partners.
 Catalytic role played for reward and recognition for their employees and
arranging transportation.
 Restriction of vendor employees having more than 60 yrs.
 In house vendor partner’s health check-up facility was established for extensive
and quality medical check-up.

15
Step-6: Periodic Evaluation
OFIs:
• System to monitor the performance of vendor
partners during work was inadequate.
• No linkage of the periodic assessment with the billing
process of vendors.
• Interaction with departmental line function was
irregular.

Actions:
 Assessment of vendors was carried out on a scale of 0-5 ( star rating)
 Re-assessment was carried out every 6 months and feed back to them on OFIs.
 Monthly review of improvement plans of vendor partners by CO.
 Subsequently from 31st Mar’17 those vendors could not comply to our internal star
rating score of 3, was debarred from further enquiry.
 Engaged third party for CSM star rating for cross calibration.
16
Results

 100 % evaluation of any new vendor before entry


 Quality vendors for the job
 Risk categorisation of the job
 Pre-bid and pre-award meetings pre ordering
 Ownership and involvement of CA/CO for each contract
 Pre-work meetings before deployment
 Commitment from the vendor partners
 100 % safety orientation training before entry
 Mandatory SOP/Job specific training prior to engaging in the job
 Deployment of competent supervisors
 Two way communications

17
Practices

Awareness session for CA/CO Identification of high risk before Selection process before
service request registration

Visual Standard Operating Procedure First aid box checking at vendor office Job Hazard Analysis by Vendors

18
Practices

First aider training to the supervisors CSM workshop for proprietors Internal auditor trg to the supervisors

First aid training to the vendor


Felt leadership program for vendors BBS training to the site supervisors employees

19
Practices

Safety mass meeting taken by CA Safety tool box meeting at site SOP training by CO

Near miss reporting in regional


Fire fighting training to workers Rewarding to best employee
Hazards training at site language

20
Practices

Assessment by CA/CO Assessment by Expert agency Rewarding Best Contractor

Vendor performance monitoring Departmental rolling trophy Monthly vendor


evaluation by CO

21
CSM Implementation

Target 85 %

Improving trend of CSM implementation

22
Action plan to sustain:-

• To get more capable vendors, vendor development to get more importance


and non performing vendors to be debarred.
• Obtaining OHSAS certification for class A/B vendors in a phase manner.
• Providing amenities to all vendor partners workers (Rest rooms, Canteen
facility etc.)
• Developing mentor mentee inter-dependent relationship among vendors.
• Skill development of vendor partners employees and selection procedure to be
implemented.
• Converting all SOP to regional language through expertise.
• Handhold vendors to achieve 3 star rating through workshops.
• Monthly performance monitoring and linkage of the performance to vendor
billing.
• IT intervention in CSM standard implementation.

23
Thank you
Questions Please?

24

You might also like