TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction.....................................................................................................................3
1.1 Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994..................................................................3
1.2 Similarities and Differences........................................................................................3
2.0 Case Studies....................................................................................................................3
2.1 Facts of the Case.........................................................................................................3
2.2 Legal Issue...................................................................................................................3
2.3 Court Judgement..........................................................................................................3
3.0 Relations with Malaysian Law........................................................................................3
4.0 Recommendation.............................................................................................................3
5.0 Conclusion.......................................................................................................................3
Bibliography...............................................................................................................................4
Page 1 of 10
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT 1994 AND
HEALTH AND SAFETY AT WORK ETC. ACT 1974
In Malaysia, the Parliament of Malaysia enacted the Occupational and Safety Act
1994 to regulate, promote and enforce occupational safety and health in Malaysia. What it
aims to do is address the inadequacy of past legislations, which are still in force today so long
as it remains consistent with the provisions of the Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994.
The United Kingdom sees a different situation. While the Parliament of the United
Kingdom passed the Health and Safety in the Workplace etc. Act 1974, it is amendable
directly and indirectly by subsequent:
1. Acts of Parliament
2. Acts of the devolved Parliaments and Legislature:
a. Acts of Scottish Parliament;
b. Measures of the Welsh National Assembly;
c. Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly.
3. Subsidiary legislation by the respective Secretaries of States;
4. Subsidiary legislation by the devolved executives of Scotland, Northern
Ireland and Wales in their jurisdictions.
The following tables will disclose the similarities and differences of the British and
Malaysian laws and the consequences of the passage and enforcement.
Page 2 of 10
1.2 SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
Occupational Safety and Health Health and Safety at Work etc.
Act 1994 Act 1974
Differences Centralises enforcement and Creates a comprehensive agency for
legislation of occupational safety, the regulation, advise, promotion
health and environment related and enforcement of workplace
matters with the Federal safety and health.
Government.
Funding is 100% given to the Funding is derived from both the
Federal Government’s Department regional/devolved governments and
of Occupational Safety and Health. the Whitehall/Westminster.
National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety Laboratory is part
Safety and Health (NIOSH) not of the Health and Safety Executive
legally required1 [ CITATION and responsible for research,
Nat10 \l 1033 ]. monitoring, risk assessment.
Licensing and use of nuclear Nuclear Directorate regulates
materials under purview of the nuclear use at the workplace and is
Atomic Energy Licensing Board, a part of the HSE.[ CITATION Wik103
separate government body. \l 1033 ]
The National Council for The Health and Safety Commission
Occupational Safety and Health merged with the Health and Safety
created under s. 8, OSHA 1994, has Executive on 1 April 2008 creating
powers to execute the objects of a single entity for occupational
that Act (s. 11(1), OSHA 1994). safety and health. [ CITATION
Wik104 \l 1033 ]
1
NIOSH, Malaysia, is a Company Limited by Guarantee created by the Malaysian Government under the
Companies Act 1965. It is not a statutory body or a government department created by its own specific
legislation. DOSH is a statutory body as it is created under the authority of the OSHA 1994.
Page 3 of 10
Minister makes regulations to The devolved governments and
refine the act, but no power to Whitehall has the power to pass
amend it. subsidiary legislation that can
amend the effect of the principal
act.
Similarities A set of duties created for employers and employees.
Enforcement agency permitted to conduct inspections, investigations and
recordkeeping of such activities.
Violations of the statutes carry some form of fines and imprisonment
terms.
A general rule: if subjected to inspections and investigations, the
employers have legal protection from having their manufacturing or
commercial secret being exposed by the enforcement officer.
Statistics related to occupational safety and health must be created and
updated regularly.
Page 4 of 10
2.0 CASE STUDY: BARBER V. SOMERSET COUNTY
COUNCIL [2004] UKHL 13
2.1 FACTS OF THE CASE
In 1995, Barber, a teacher, was employed as a head of department in a school.
Changes at the school resulted in a new role for Barber, but he found the changes and
increased hours very stressful.
Despite raising concerns with his employer, he received little sympathy, and soon
became ill with stress and depression. Eventually he suffered a nervous breakdown.
Barber sued his employer for damages for personal injury, and was awarded more than
£100,000. This decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal which considered three cases
together, known as Hatton v Sutherland CC, and provided clear guidance on when employers
might be liable for employees' work-related stress. However, Barber appealed, and his case
went to the House of Lords.
2.2 LEGAL ISSUE
Per Lord Scott of Foscote: the issue in this case is whether the Somerset County
Council, who employed Mr Barber as a teacher at their East Bridgwater Community School,
are liable to him in damages for the mental breakdown he suffered brought about by the
pressures and stresses of his workload.
2.3 COURT JUDGEMENT
For the purpose of the court judgement, I’m summarising Lord Walker of
Gestingthorpe’s judgement as all the Law Lords on the Bench concurred with his decision.
Where Lord Rodger of Earlsferry and Lord Scott of Foscote’s judgements are concerned, the
learned judges referred predominantly on the Appellant’s contractual duties.
In summary of Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe’s judgement, the employers owed a
duty of care to the employees to the degree that they ought to inquire on the appellant’s
Page 5 of 10
emotional and mental wellbeing, especially when a physician’s opinion supports the
appellant’s claims.
While the school may have been constrained by budget cuts and fiscal issues, they
should take measures to alleviate the pressure on the appellant.
Their Lordships found that after his first sickness absence, his employer should at
least have made 'sympathetic enquiries' and considered what could have been done to help.
The useful guidance given by the Court of Appeal means employers can ordinarily assume
that employees are up to their job.
A duty may arise however, as in this case, if any steps can be taken to assist an
employee who is having difficulty coping. Barber's employer was found wanting and as such
had breached its duty of care and was liable in negligence.
Page 6 of 10
3.0 RELATIONS WITH MALAYSIAN LAW
The Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994 is silent on stress at the workplace.
However, the general principles underlying the passage of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act 1994 include:
Creating a safe and healthy environment;
To take care of the welfare of the employees.
Based on the subsidiary legislations, there are no legal requirements for the employers to
report stress-related outcomes. For instance the Occupational Safety and Health (Notification
of Accidents, Dangerous Occurrences, Occupational Poisoning and Occupational Diseases)
Regulations 2004 is silent on stress or mental or emotional trauma.
Page 7 of 10
4.0 RECOMMENDATION
In the DOSH Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health in the Office, it merely
states as the following:
“Workplace stress is of increasing concern in offices and is still poorly understood.
Stress arises when the demands on the worker exceed the capacity to cope. Stressful
situations should be identified in the office and safeguards must be implemented at
organisational level to minimise the risk. This might means making changes in the
organisation of the work2. [ CITATION Dep96 \l 1033 ]”
According to the Guidance for the Prevention of Stress and Violence at the
Workplace, the employers are advised to be wary of stress in the office and the causes.
Prompt intervention is recommended by the Department to prevent the situation from
escalating. The guide also suggests the need for the employer to conduct counselling,
performance monitoring – among others [ CITATION Dep02 \l 1033 ].
2
Pg. 14, Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health in the Office
Page 8 of 10
5.0 CONCLUSION
In conclusion, legally the employers are not required to be concerned with a stressed
out worker. Yet, a stressed out worker can and will lower productivity. The workers will
interpret whether the employer cares or otherwise on the mental wellbeing of the employees.
Statistically speaking, the French workforce enjoys six weeks’ vacation per annum in
addition to a maximum of 39 working hours a week. As far as competitiveness is concerned,
France came in the 27th place in the World Economic Forum ranking. Funny enough, French
workers are the most productive – leaving the British, German, U.S., and Japanese
workforce! Norway, where workers work less than France, makes US$500 more than the
French, U.S. and German workers in terms of Gross National Income per capita (GNI)
[ CITATION Ack05 \l 1033 ].
In this 21st Century, workplaces are becoming more and more displaced. Instead of
being centralised in a company-owned premise, today’s employees begin to enjoy more
flexibility and freedom than their counterparts in the past. New concepts such as the Results
Only Work Environment (R.O.W.E.) see employees being paid for worked done instead of
hours clocked [ CITATION Wik105 \l 1033 ]. While infrastructure may differ, the constant, it
seems, is the stress on the employees. An approach by MindValley
(http://www.mindvalley.com/) is bringing out the whole staff for weeklong vacations.
Sooner or later, these trends and more will land on Malaysian shores. With the boom
in Internet use among present and future Malaysian workforce, the only certainty is soon.
Otherwise another issue which we need to deal with is “brain drain”.
Page 9 of 10
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ackman, D. (22 March, 2005). France, Bastion Of Productivity. Retrieved 8 November, 2010, from
Forbes: http://www.forbes.com/2005/03/22/cx_da_0322topnews_print.html
Department of Occupational Safety and Health. (2002). Guidance for the Prevention of Stress and
Violence at the Workplace. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional.
Department of Occupational Safety and Health. (1996). Guidelines on Occupational Safety and
Health in the Office. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional.
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. (n.d.). About Us. Retrieved 15 October, 2010,
from National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health: http://www.niosh.gov.my/about-us.htm
Occupational Safety and Health Act 1994. (1994). Kuala Lumpur.
Soehod, K. b., & Laxman, L. K. (2007). Law on Safety and Health in Malaysia. Johor Bahru:
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Wikipedia. (24 October, 2010). Health and Safety Executive. Retrieved 8 November, 2010, from
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_and_Safety_Executive
Wikipedia. (9 October, 2010). Health and Safety_Commission. Retrieved 8 November, 2010, from
Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_and_Safety_Commission
Wikipedia. (14 October, 2010). ROWE. Retrieved 8 November, 2010, from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROWE
Page 10 of 10