0% found this document useful (0 votes)
99 views4 pages

Rule 3

This document outlines various sections of Rule 3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure regarding parties to civil actions. It provides summaries of several Supreme Court cases that discuss different types of parties such as plaintiffs, defendants, parties in interest, representatives, spouses, permissive joinder of parties, compulsory joinder of indispensable parties, necessary parties, class suits, unknown defendants, effect of death of a party, and transfer of interest. The cases provide examples of how these different types of parties and rules on joinder have been applied.

Uploaded by

pasmo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
99 views4 pages

Rule 3

This document outlines various sections of Rule 3 of the Rules of Civil Procedure regarding parties to civil actions. It provides summaries of several Supreme Court cases that discuss different types of parties such as plaintiffs, defendants, parties in interest, representatives, spouses, permissive joinder of parties, compulsory joinder of indispensable parties, necessary parties, class suits, unknown defendants, effect of death of a party, and transfer of interest. The cases provide examples of how these different types of parties and rules on joinder have been applied.

Uploaded by

pasmo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

RULE 3

Parties to Civil Actions

Section 1.Who may be parties; plaintiff and defendant.

[G.R. No. 53820. June 15, 1992.]


YAO KA SIN TRADING, vs. HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS

[G.R. No. 154618. April 14, 2004.]


AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES SINGAPORE LTD. VS. INTEGRATED SILICON
TECHNOLOGY PHILIPPINES CORPORATION

[G.R. No. 155001. January 21, 2004.]


DEMOSTHENESP vs. PHILIPPINE INTERNATIONAL AIR TERMINALS CO.

[G.R. No. 76225. March 31, 1992.]


ESPIRIDION TANPINGCO vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT

[G.R. No. 149097. October 18, 2004.]


MACARIO S. TANCUNTIAN vs. CECILIO VICENTE T. GEMPESAW and COURT
OF APPEALS.

[G.R. No. 181293. February 23, 2015.]


"RISA" HONTIVEROS-BARAQUEL, et al. vs. TOLL REGULATORY BOARD,

Section 2.Parties in interest.

[G.R. No. 186993. August 22, 2012.]


THEODORE and NANCY ANG vs. SPOUSES ALAN and EM ANG.

[G.R. No. 154330. February 15, 2007.]


ELIZABETH GODINEZ vs. HON. OSCAR G. TIROL

[G.R. No. 149417. June 4, 2004.]


GLORIA SANTOS DUEÑAS vs. SANTOS SUBDIVISION HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION

[G.R. No. 80447. January 31, 1989.]


BALIWAG TRANSIT, INC. vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS

[G.R. No. 191320. April 25, 2017.]


JONA BUMATAY vs. LOLITA BUMATAY

Section 3. Representatives as parties.

[G.R. No. 77356. July 15, 1991.]


TRAVEL WIDE ASSOCIATED SALES (PHILS.), vs. COURT OF APPEALS.

[GR. 143870, SEP. 30, 2005]


MANILA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT VS. RIVERA VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION

1
Section 4. Spouses as parties.
MIRANDA VS. BESA JULY 30, 2004

Section 6. Permissive joinder of parties.

[GR. 140746, MARCH 16, 2005]


PANTRANCO V. STANDARD INSURANCE,

[G.R. No. L-66620. September 24, 1986.]


REMEDIO V. FLORES vs. HON. JUDGE HEILIA S. MALLARE-PHILLIPPS

G.R. No. 191170. September 14, 2016.]


CAMERON GRANVILLE 3 ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. vs. FIDEL O. CHUA

Section 7. Compulsory joinder of indispensable parties.

[G.R. No. 152808. September 30, 2005.]


ANTONIO T. CHUA vs. TOTAL OFFICE PRODUCTS

[G.R. No. 102900. October 2, 1997.]


MARCELINO ARCELONA, et al vs. COURT OF APPEALS

[G.R. No. 109910, April 5, 1995]


SALVADOR V. CA

[G.R. No. 16037, November 29, 2006]


CARANDANG V. HEIRS OF QUIRINO A. DE GUZMAN

[G.R. No. 168979. December 2, 2013.]


REBECCA PACAÑA-CONTRERAS vs. ROVILA WATER SUPPLY, INC.

[G.R. No. 169276. June 16, 2009.]


DIONISIA MONIS LAGUNILLA vs. ANDREA MONIS VELASCO and MACARIA
MONIS

[G.R. No. 224204. August 30, 2017.]


PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK vs. SPOUSES RAMON AND ANNABELLE
SABADO

[G.R. No. 208450. June 5, 2017.]


SPS. ROBERTO ABOITIZ AND MARIA CRISTINA CABARRUS, vs. SPS. PETER L.
PO AND VICTORIA L. PO

[G.R. No. 208497. June 5, 2017.]


SPS. PETER L. PO AND VICTORIA L. PO, vs. SPS. ROBERTO ABOITIZ AND
MARIA CRISTINA CABARRUS,

[G.R. No. 222740. September 28, 2016.]


ST. LUKE'S COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, vs. SPOUSES PEREZ

2
[G.R. No. 196894. March 3, 2014.]
JESUS CRISOLOGO and NANETTE CRISOLOGO vs. JEWM AGRO-
INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION

[G.R. No. 174909. January 20, 2016.]


MARCELINO M. FLORETE, JR. vs. ROGELIO M. FLORETE et al

[G.R. No. 177275. January 20, 2016.]


ROGELIO FLORETE, SR. vs. MARCELINO M. FLORETE, JR., MARIA
ELENA F. MUYCO

[G.R. No. 206584. January 11, 2016.]


MAE FLOR GALIDO vs. NELSON P. MAGRARE

[G.R. No. 179129. November 9, 2015.]


SAPPHIRE SECURITIES, INC. vs. MARIA ANGELES CACHO-OLIVARES

G.R. No. 208343. February 3, 2016.]


SPOUSES CEFERINO C. LAUS and MONINA P. LAUS, and SPOUSES ANTONIO
O. KOH and ELISA T. KOH, vs. OPTIMUM SECURITY SERVICES, INC.

Section 8.Necessary party.

[G.R.NO. 151900. AUGUST 30, 2005]


CHRISTINE CHUA vs. JORGE TORRES, respondents.

[G.R. No. 193753. September 26, 2012.]


LIVING @ SENSE, INC. vs. MALAYAN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC

Section 12. Class suit.

[G.R. No. L-23136. August 26, 1974.]


ISMAEL MATHAY vs. THE CONSOLIDATED BANK AND TRUST COMPANY

LIANA’S SUPERMARKET V. NLRC MAY 31, 1996

[G.R. No. L-31061. August 17, 1976.]


SULO NG BAYAN, INC., vs. GREGORIO ARANETA, INC.

EN BANC
[G.R. No. 101083. July 30, 1993.]
OPOSA et al. v. HON. FUGENCIO FACTORAN

[G.R. No. 152272. March 5, 2012.]


JUANA COMPLEX I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC vs. FIL-ESTATE LAND,
INC.

[G.R. No. 152397. March 5, 2012.]


FIL-ESTATE LAND, INC vs. JUANA COMPLEX I HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
INC.

3
Section 14. Unknown Identity or Name of Defendant.

[G.R. No. 175409. September 7, 2011.]


PHILIPPINE CHARTER INSURANCE CORPORATION vs. EXPLORER MARITIME
CO., LTD.,

Section 16. Death of party; duty of counsel.

[G.R. No. 79416. September 5, 1989.]


ROSALINA BONIFACIO, et al vs. HON. NATIVIDAD G. DIZON,

[G.R. No. 191079. March 2, 2016.]


JOEL CARDENAS, HEIR OF ALCANTARA vs. HEIRS OF AGUILAR

[G.R. No. 220479. August 17, 2016.]


PASDA, INCORPORATED, vs. REYNALDO P. DIMAYACYAC, SR

[G.R. NO. 162788. JULY 28, 2005]


SPOUSES JULITA DELA CRUZ and FELIPE DELA CRUZ
PEDRO JOAQUIN

[G.R. No. 134100. September 29, 2000.]


PURITA ALIPIO vs. COURT OF APPEALS and ROMEO
G.JARING,

[G.R. No. L-38051. December 26, 1974.]


SEVERINO PAREDES vs. THE HON. JOSE L. MOYA

[G.R. No. 196919. June 6, 2011.]


JOSE RAMILO O.REGALADO vs. CHAUCER B.
REGALADO

G.R. No. 149787. June 18, 2008.]


JUDGE ANTONIO C. SUMALJAG, vs. SPOUSES DIOSDIDIT and MENENDEZ M.
LITERATO

EN BANC [G.R. No. 119193. March 29, 1996.]


HEIRS OF MAYOR NEMENCIO GALVEZ, vs. COURT OF APPEALS

Section 19. Transfer of interest.

[G.R. No. 165770. August 9, 2010.]


HEIRS OF FRANCISCA MEDRANO, et al vs. ESTANISLAO DE VERA.

[G.R. No. 181186. February 3, 2016.]


SIGUION REYNA MONTECILLO AND ONGSIAKO LAW OFFICES vs. HON.
NORMA CHIONLO-SIA

You might also like