Scribd
Upload
82 views2 pages

Legal Analysis: Arroyo vs. DOJ

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the creation of the COMELEC-DOJ Joint Panel and Joint Order No. 001-2011. It ruled that while the Comelec has exclusive power to investigate and prosecute election offenses, it can avail itself of assistance from other government prosecution arms. The resolution creating the joint panel was a valid exercise of Comelec's power to ensure prompt investigation and prosecution of election offenses in fulfilling its mandate to ensure free and honest elections. The petitions challenging the joint panel and order were dismissed.

Uploaded by

Renz Guiang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
82 views2 pages

Legal Analysis: Arroyo vs. DOJ

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the creation of the COMELEC-DOJ Joint Panel and Joint Order No. 001-2011. It ruled that while the Comelec has exclusive power to investigate and prosecute election offenses, it can avail itself of assistance from other government prosecution arms. The resolution creating the joint panel was a valid exercise of Comelec's power to ensure prompt investigation and prosecution of election offenses in fulfilling its mandate to ensure free and honest elections. The petitions challenging the joint panel and order were dismissed.

Uploaded by

Renz Guiang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Case Digest: Arroyo vs.

DOJ
G.R. No. 199082 : September 18, 2012

JOSE MIGUEL T. ARROYO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;


COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS; HON. LEILA DE LIMA, in her capacity as
Secretary of the Department of Justice; HON. SIXTO BRILLANTES, JR., in
his capacity as Chairperson of the Commission on Elections; and the
JOINT DOJ-COMELEC PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION COMMITTEE and
FACT-FINDING TEAM, Respondents.

FACTS:

The Comelec issued Resolution No. 9266 approving the creation of a joint
committee with the Department of Justice (DOJ), which shall conduct preliminary
investigation on the alleged election offenses and anomalies committed during
the 2004 and 2007 elections.

The Comelec and the DOJ issued Joint Order No. 001-2011 creating and
constituting a Joint Committee and Fact-Finding Team on the 2004 and 2007
National Elections electoral fraud and manipulation cases composed of officials
from the DOJ and the Comelec. In its initial report, the Fact-Finding Team
concluded that manipulation of the results in the May 14, 2007 senatorial
elections in the provinces of North and South Cotabato and Maguindanao were
indeed perpetrated. The Fact-Finding Team recommended that herein petitioners
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA), et al. to be subjected to preliminary
investigation for electoral sabotage.

After the preliminary investigation, the COMELEC en banc adopted a resolution


ordering that information/s for the crime of electoral sabotage be filed against
GMA, et al. while that the charges against Jose Miguel Arroyo, among others,
should be dismissed for insufficiency of evidence.

Consequently, GMA, et al. assail the validity of the creation of COMELEC-DOJ


Joint Panel and of Joint Order No. 001-2011 before the Supreme Court.

ISSUES:
I. Whether or not the creation of COMELEC-DOJ Joint Panel is valid?
II. Whether or not Joint Order No. 001-2011 violates the equal protection
clause?

HELD: Petitions are DISMISSED.

FIRST ISSUE: The creation of COMELEC-DOJ Joint Panel is valid.

POLITICAL LAW: powers of COMELEC

Section 2, Article IX-C of the 1987 Constitution enumerates the powers and
functions of the Comelec. The grant to the Comelec of the power to investigate
and prosecute election offenses as an adjunct to the enforcement and
administration of all election laws is intended to enable the Comelec to effectively
insure to the people the free, orderly, and honest conduct of elections. The
constitutional grant of prosecutorial power in the Comelec was reflected in
Section 265 of Batas Pambansa Blg. 881, otherwise known as the Omnibus
Election Code.

Under the above provision of law, the power to conduct preliminary investigation
is vested exclusively with the Comelec. The latter, however, was given by the
same provision of law the authority to avail itself of the assistance of other
prosecuting arms of the government. Thus, under the Omnibus Election Code,
while the exclusive jurisdiction to conduct preliminary investigation had been
lodged with the Comelec, the prosecutors had been conducting preliminary
investigations pursuant to the continuing delegated authority given by the
Comelec.

Thus, Comelec Resolution No. 9266, approving the creation of the Joint
Committee and Fact-Finding Team, should be viewed not as an abdication of the
constitutional bodys independence but as a means to fulfill its duty of ensuring
the prompt investigation and prosecution of election offenses as an adjunct of its
mandate of ensuring a free, orderly, honest, peaceful and credible elections.

You might also like