0% found this document useful (0 votes)
323 views15 pages

Concerned Boholabos Vs Calibo

Consti

Uploaded by

Jerome C obusan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
323 views15 pages

Concerned Boholabos Vs Calibo

Consti

Uploaded by

Jerome C obusan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Home

Law Firm

Law Library

Laws

Jurisprudence

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2007 > September 2007 Decisions > A.M. No. RTJ-01-
1621 - Concerned Boholanos for Law & Order v. Judge Dionisio R. Calibo Jr etc.:

A.M. No. RTJ-01-1621 - Concerned Boholanos for Law & Order v. Judge Dionisio R. Calibo Jr etc.

PHILIPPINE SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

FIRST DIVISION

[A.M. NO. RTJ-01-1621 : September 27, 2007]

CONCERNED BOHOLANOS FOR LAW AND ORDER, Complainants, v. JUDGE DIONISIO R. CALIBO, JR., RTC,
BRANCH 50, LOAY, BOHOL, Respondent.

DECISION
SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.:

In an anonymous complaint dated August 28, 2000 filed by "Concerned Boholanos for Law and Order,"
Judge Dionisio R. Calibo, Jr., of the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 50, Loay, Bohol, is charged with
conduct unbecoming a judge and highly unethical act for "publicly speaking on radio and in public fora
regarding his bias and parochial views on certain controversial issues against public personalities and
public officials."

Required to comment, respondent claimed that the complaint was initiated by the "alter ego" of the
provincial governor because of his objection to the sale of the performing assets of the provincial
government of Bohol disadvantageous to the latter.

Then Court Administrator Alfredo L. Benipayo designated retired Justice Pedro A. Ramirez of the Court
of Appeals, former Consultant in the Office of the Court Administrator, as Hearing Officer to investigate
the complaint. On August 5, 2005, he submitted his Report and Recommendation.

After a review of Justice Ramirez's Report and Recommendation, the Court RESOLVES to ADOPT and
APPROVE his findings of facts and conclusions of law reproduced as follows:

Respondent Judge relates the antecedents of the controversy. He states that a very questionable and
controversial project was being pursued by the Provincial Governor which was to sell the two major
performing assets of the Province of Bohol, the Provincial Electrical System (PES) and the Provincial
Waterworks System (PWS) of the Provincial Utilities Division (PPUD), without consulting its customers in
Tagbilaran and Dauis, Bohol, which are the places served by these two utilities. It was shocking to the
people because it was of public knowledge that these were the only major profitable ventures of the
province. It was no surprise, therefore, that the residents of these two towns went on the air over the
three radio stations vigorously protesting this move of the Governor.

Respondent Judge narrates that although he is one of the consumers affected by the projected sale, he
kept silent. He claims that since his appointment, he had distanced himself from the media even if he
was previously the head of the Department of Public Information. However, when it became apparent
that the Governor was ignoring the legitimate issues presented by the people, he decided to take part in
the debate. He studied the documents and concluded that indeed it was a contract that would be very
disadvantageous to the province. He joined the oppositors and admits having gone on the air. Although
the Governor did not do anything to stop him, other provincial officials tried to suppress respondent's
revelations on the air reasoning that being a Judge, respondent should not involve himself in
controversy. The concerned consumers filed a petition to stop the projected sale at auction and
respondent admits having taken the stand for the petitioners. As regards the statement of Judge Melicor
in his order quoted above, the respondent Judge made no mention of it in his Comment.

It was probably because of this Order of Judge Melicor describing the acts of respondent Judge
attempting to influence another Judge who was presiding the injunction petition that prompted DCA
Bernardo T. Ponferrada to recommend, despite the fact that the complaint is not under oath, that an
investigation be conducted to determine the extent of Judge Calibo's liability.

xxx

x x x As it can be seen, the letter complaint is anonymous. For this reason, the undersigned is submitting
this Report based on the pleadings extant on the record.

As regards going on the air to express one's opinion over a matter of public concern, the undersigned
believes that respondent Judge cannot be held to answer administratively simply because he was only
exercising his constitutional right to be heard in a petition for the redress of grievances. As a consumer
and as a member of the body politic, it was his right, nay his duty to air what he honestly believed to be
an incipient irregularity.

However, his two telephone calls to Judge Achilles L. Melicor who was presiding the court where the
petition to stop the governor was pending, definitely violates the Code of Judicial Conduct, particularly
Section 3 of Canon I, which states that "Judges shall refrain from influencing in any manner the outcome
of litigation or dispute pending before another court or administrative agency."

Rule 140, Section 7, classifies gross misconduct constituting violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct as
a serious offense and penalizes the same with "dismissal from the service, with forfeiture of benefits
and with prejudice to reemployment; suspension from office without salary for more than three (3) but
not exceeding six (6) months; or a fine of more than P20,000.00 but not exceeding P40,000.00."

Considering the inappropriateness of the calls made by respondent Judge to another Judge who was
presiding the Court where the case was being heard, it is respectfully recommended that said
respondent Judge Dionisio R. Calibo, Jr., be made to pay a fine of P25,000.00.

We observed, however, that this is the first time respondent Judge has been charged
administratively.ςηαñrοblεš νιr†υαl lαω lιbrαrÿ
This is a mitigating circumstance. Hence, the recommended penalty of fine of P25,000.00 is reduced to
only P20,000.00.

ACCORDINGLY, and as recommended by Justice Pedro A. Ramirez, Judge Dionisio R. Calibo, Jr. of the
RTC, Branch 50, Loay, Bohol, is declared guilty of serious misconduct and is ordered to pay a FINE of
P20,000.00, payable to this Court within ten (10) days from notice.

SO ORDERED.

Puno, C.J., (Chairperson), Corona, Azcuna, and Garcia, JJ., concur.

Back to Home | Back to Main

chanrobles.com

Custom Search

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

ChanRobles Internet Bar Review : www.chanroblesbar.com


September-2007 Jurisprudence

A.C. No. 5739 - Penelco I v. Montemayor

A.C. No. 3731 - MANUEL S. SEBASTIAN v. ATTY. EMILY A. BAJAR

A.M. No. 07-7-343-RTC - RE: ABSENCE WITHOUT OFFICIAL LEAVE (AWOL) OF MR. ROBERT L. BORCILLO,
UTILITY WORKER I, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF ILOILO CITY, BRANCH 28.

A.M. No. 07-9-12-SC - THE RULE ON THE WRIT OF AMPARO

A.M. No. 07-7-17-SC - Re: Letter of Judge Augustus C. Diaz, etc.

A.M. No. 07-7-343-RTC - RE: ABSENCE WITHOUT OFFICIAL LEAVE (AWOL) OF MR. ROBERT L. BORCILLO,
UTILITY WORKER I, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF ILOILO CITY, BRANCH 28.
A.M. No. MTJ-07-1685 - Formerly OCA IPI No. 05-1792-MTJ - GIDEON B. JUSON v. JUDGE VICENTE C.
MONDRAGON

A.M. No. MTJ-03-1505 - Mamasau Sultan Ali v. Hon. Baguinda Ali Pacalna, et al.

A.M. No. MTJ-06-1649 - Formerly OCA IPI No. 04-1605-MTJ - Ang Kek Chen v. Judge Cristina Javalera-
Sulit, et al.

A.M. No. MTJ-07-1667 - OCA v. Judge James Go, et al.

A.M. No. MTJ-07-1685 - Formerly OCA IPI No. 05-1792-MTJ - GIDEON B. JUSON v. JUDGE VICENTE C.
MONDRAGON

A.M. No. P-05-1963 - Divina D. Balingit, et al. v. Aurora T. Laranang etc.

A.M. No. P-05-2000 - Atty. Jose A. Suelto v. Deputy Sheriffs Rogelio P. Forniza etc., et al.

A.M. No. P-06-2184 - Marcela Guilas-Gamis v. Judge Rodolfo P. Beltran, et al.

A.M. No. P-06-2198 - Formerly OCA IPI No. 05-2214-P - Sta. Lucia East commercial Corp etc. v. Conrado
G. Lamano etc.

A.M. No. P-06-2238 - Edgar Noel C. Licardo v. Juliet Almonte Licardo, et al.

A.M. No. RTJ-07-2043 - JUAN DE LA CRUZ v. JUDGE RUBEN B. CARRETAS

A.M. No. RTJ-01-1621 - Concerned Boholanos for Law & Order v. Judge Dionisio R. Calibo Jr etc.

A.M. NO. RTJ-06-1994 - Formerly A.M. No. 06-240-RTC - OCA v. Judge Leoncio M. Janolo, et al.
A.M. No. RTJ-06-1995 - Formerly OCA IPI No. 02-1480-RTJ - Felicidad Tenenan v. Judge Fernando F. Flor,
Jr.

A.M. No. RTJ-07-2083 - Formerly A.M. OCA IPI No. 06-2489-RTJ - Benjamin M. Mina, Jr. v. Judge Pedro B.
Corales etc.

A.M. No. RTJ-07-2043 - JUAN DE LA CRUZ v. JUDGE RUBEN B. CARRETAS

G.R. No. 130348 - MIGUEL SORIANO, JR., ET AL. v. ANTERO SORIANO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 132403 and G.R. NO. 132419 - Hi-Cement Corp. v. Insular Bank of Asia & America / E.T. Henry &
Co. et al v. Insular / Bank of Asia & America.

G.R. No. 132502 and G.R. No. 132503 - BENIGNO M. PUNO, ET AL. v. THE COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. NOS. 137355-58 - Eugen U. Caballero, et al. v. Sandiganbayan, et al.

G.R. No. 137548 - HEIRS OF THE LATE DOMINGO N. NICOLAS v. METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST
COMPANY

G.R. No. 138142 - THE PRESIDENTIAL AD HOC FACT-FINDING COMMITTEE ON BEHEST LOANS, ET AL. v.
OMBUDSMAN ANIANO A. DESIERTO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 140337 - Ake Hernudd, et al v. Lars E. Lofgren, et al.

G.R. No. 140474 - Municipality of Sta. Fe v. Municipality of Aritao

G.R. No. 140656 and G.R. No. 154482 - MAYOR FELIPE K. CONSTANTINO v. HON. SANDIGANBAYAN, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 142896 - CANELAND SUGAR CORPORATION v. HON. REYNALDO M. ALON, ET AL.
G.R. No. 144208 - EFREN TANDOG, ET AL. v. RENATO MACAPAGAL, ET AL.

G.R. No. 146212 - FRED N. BELLO v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 146221 - Atlas Consolidated Mining & Devt. Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

G.R. No. 146259 - FLORENTINO, TROADIO & PEDRO ALL SURNAMED OCHOA v. MAURO APETA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 146454 - PAMELA S. SEVILLENO, ET AL. v. PACITA CARILO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 147695 - MANUEL C. PAGTALUNAN v. RUFINA DELA CRUZ VDA. DE MANZANO

G.R. No. 146511 - TOMAS ANG v. ASSOCIATED BANK, ET AL.

G.R. No. 147961 - FOREVER SECURITY & GENERAL SERVICES v. ROMEO FLORES, ET AL.

G.R. No. 148308 - Roberto D. Debaudln v. Social Security System, et al.

G.R. No. 148325 - REYNALDO P. FLOIRENDO, JR. v. METROPOLITAN BANK and TRUST COMPANY

G.R. No. 148846 - Cecilia Amodia Vda De Melencion, et al. v. Hon. Court of Appeals, et al.

G.R. No. 148980 - PCI Leasing & Finance Inc v. Sps. George M. Dai etc.

G.R. No. 149023 - Leo Winston Brin Lee v. Sps. Amadeo & Adelaida Carreon

G.R. No. 149072 - Esther S. Pagano v. Juan Nazarro Jr., et al.


G.R. No. 149625 - Weena Express Inc. v. Godofredo R. Rapacon, et al.

G.R. No. 149372 - RICARDO BACABAC v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

G.R. No. 149858 - FRANCISCO M. BAX v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, ET AL.

G.R. No. 149995 - Isidro Pablito M. Palana v. People of the Philippines

G.R. No. 150173 - PACIFICO GARING, ET AL. v. HEIRS OF MARCOS SILVA, ET AL.

G.R. NOS. 150329-30 - RONALD K. GO, ET AL. v. THE HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN, ET AL.

G.R. No. 150731 - CASENT REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. PHILBANKING CORPORATION

G.R. No. 152273 - MARS C. PALISOC v. EASWAYS MARINE, INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 152407 - Sps. Florendo Dauz etc, et al. v. Sps. Eligio & Lorenza Chavez, et al.

G.R. NOS. 152505-06 - PRUDENTIAL GUARANTEE and ASSURANCE, INC. v. EQUINOX LAND
CORPORATION

G.R. No. 153029 - Bea Triz etc. all Surnamed Acre v. Evangeline Yuttikki

G.R. No. 154276 - Conrado Cuyugan v. Rodolfo Siasoco

G.R. No. 153290 - BMG RECORDS (PHILS.), INC., ET AL. v. AIDA C. APARECIO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 154438 - ALICIA F. RICAFORTE v. LEON L. JURADO


G.R. No. 154654 - JOSEPHINE A. TAGUINOD, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

G.R. No. 155731 - LOLITA LOPEZ v. BODEGA CITY, ET AL.

G.R. No. 155903 - C.F. SHARP CREW MANAGEMENT, INC. v. HON. UNDERSECRETARY JOSE M. ESPANOL,
JR., ET AL.

G.R. No. 155990 - UNIVERSAL AQUARIUS, INC., ET AL. v. Q.C. HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION

G.R. No. 156100 - VILMA E. ROMAGOS v. METRO CEBU WATER DISTRICT, ET AL.

G.R. No. 156337 - UCPB v. Alberto T. Looyuko, et al.

G.R. No. 156364 - JACOBUS BERNHARD HULST v. PR BUILDERS, INC.

G.R. No. 156539 - DOMINGO A. DIZON v. ELPIDIO R. DIZON

G.R. No. 156905 - ATHENA COMPUTERS, INC., ET AL. v. WESNU A. REYES

G.R. No. 157076 - PROGRESSIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - PIZZA HUT, ET AL. v. EVERGISTO
ANTONIO E. SARMIENTO, ET AL.

G.R. No. 157201 - Nemrod Gotis v. People of the Philippines

G.R. No. 157472 - Ssgt. Jose M. Pacoy v. Hon. Afable E. Cajigal, et al.

G.R. No. 157856 - Concepcion C. Anillo v. Commission on the Settlement of Land Problems etc, et al.

G.R. No. 158897 - REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES v. FREDESVINDA ALMEDA CONSUNJI


G.R. No. 159343 - Pedy Caseres, et al. v. Universal Robina Sugar Milling Corp., et al.

G.R. No. 159349 - VICTOR ANDRES MANHIT v. OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, ET AL.

G.R. No. 159974 - JESUS CAYABYAB, ET AL. v. ROSEMARIE GOMEZ DE AQUINO, ETC.

G.R. No. 161098 - Office of the Ombudsman v. Celso Santiago

G.R. No. 160303 - G & S Transport Corp v. Tito S. Infante, et al.

G.R. No. 161735 - Ex-C1C Jimmy B. Sanchez, et al. v. Roberto T. Lastimoso etc.

G.R. No. 163130 - SAN ROQUE REALTY AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES

G.R. No. 164710 - Ronald C. Jaucian v. Gen. Reynaldo G. Wycoco, et al.

G.R. No. 164733 - Michael John Z. Malto v. People of the Philippines

G.R. No. 165272 - Sergio Osme a III, et al. v. SS etc., et al.

G.R. No. 165888 - Sps. Brilly V. Bernardez etc. v. Hon. Court of Appeals, et al.

G.R. No. 165963 - SPOUSES NORBERTO OLIVEROS, ET AL. v. THE HONORABLE PRESIDING JUDGE,
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 24, BIÑAN, LAGUNA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 165971 - SPOUSES JEANETTE MALIWAT, ET AL. v. METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY
G.R. No. 165975 - Payakan G. Tilendo v. Ombudsman, et al.

G.R. No. 166241 - RUBEN LASCANO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

G.R. No. 166547 - UMBRA M. TOMAWIS v. ATTY. NORA M. TABAO-CAUDANG

G.R. No. 166800 and G.R. NO. 168924 - Leca Realty Corp. v. Manuela Corp, et al/Leca Realty Corp. v.
Manuel Corp, et al.

G.R. No. 167224 - Nolito L. Manago v. Comelec, et al.

G.R. No. 167637 - Metro Eye Security Inc. v. Julie V. Salsona

G.R. No. 168779 - DBP v. Ruben S. Go, et al.

G.R. No. 167670 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. RODOLFO BIYOC y WENCESLAO

G.R. No. 168781 - CITY OF MAKATI v. THE HON. JUDGE BRICCIO C. YGAÑA, ET AL.

G.R. No. 168902 - Bartola M. Vda De Tirona, et al. v. Cirilo Encarnacion

G.R. No. 169536 - Remigia Grageda, et al. v. Hon. Nimfa C. Gomez, et al.

G.R. No. 169059 - THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. LAMBERTO RAFON

G.R. No. 169752 - Phil. Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Commission On Audit, et al.

G.R. No. 169642 - People of the Phil. v. Enrique Ceballos, Jr. y Cabrales
G.R. No. 169882 - MANOLO P. SAMSON v. CATERPILLAR, INC.

G.R. No. 169801 - Republic of the Phil. etc. v. Dona Tilla R. Bautista, et al.

G.R. No. 170361 - People of the Phil. v. Juan De La Tonga Y Perante

G.R. No. 170583 - ERNESTO M. FULLERO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES

G.R. No. 171008 - Carmelit A. Fudot v. Cattleya Land, Inc.

G.R. No. 170928 - Vicente S. Almario v. PAL Inc.

G.R. No. 171068 - HEIRS OF MARCELINA ARZADON-CRISOLOGO, ET AL. v. AGRIFINA RAÑON, ET AL.

G.R. No. 171153 - SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION EMPLOYEES UNION PHILIPPINE TRANSPORT AND
GENERAL WORKERS ORGANIZATION v. SAN MIGUEL PACKAGING PRODUCTS EMPLOYEES UNION
PAMBANSANG DIWA NG MANGGAGAWANG PILIPINO

G.R. No. 171208 - THE COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS v. HON. THELMA CANLAS TRINIDAD-PE AGUIRRE, ET
AL.

G.R. No. 172373 - People of the Phil. v. Jimmy Soriano

G.R. No. 172384 - Erminda F. Florentino v. Superv Alue Inc.

G.R. No. 172500 - Lilibeth Aricheta v. People of the Philippines

G.R. No. 172602 - HENRY T. GO v. THE FIFTH DIVISION, ET AL.

G.R. No. 172697 - People of the Phil. v. Reynaldo Villanueva Y Marquez


G.R. No. 173614 - Lolita D. Enrico v. Heirs of Sps. Eulogio B. Medinaceli, et al.

G.R. No. 173849 - Pier 8 Arrastre & Stevedoring Services Inc., et al. v. Jeff B. Boclot

G.R. No. 174668 - Marlon T. Sales v. COMELEC, et al.

G.R. No. 174771 - People of the Phil. v. Allan Nazareno Y Caburatan

G.R. NOS. 175181-82 and G.R. NOS. 175354 & 175387-88 - METROPOLITAN BANK and TRUST COMPANY,
INC. v. SLGT HOLDINGS, INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 175281 Formerly G.R. No. 152240 - The People of the Phil. v. Vincent Evangelista

G.R. No. 175333 - People of the Phil. v. Sonny Rentoria Y Velasco

G.R. No. 175451 - Rosario L. Dadulo v. The Hon. Court of Appeals, et al.

G.R. No. 175587 - PCIB v. Joseph Anthony M. Alejandro

G.R. No. 175594 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JUNJUN DUCABO

G.R. No. 175720 - Cresenciana Tubo Rodriguez etc. v. Evangeline Rodriguez, et al.

G.R. No. 175783 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. BERNARDO TUAZON Y NICOLAS

G.R. No. 175936 - CHAN CUAN, ET AL. v. CHIANG KAI SHEK COLLEGE, INC., ET AL.

G.R. No. 175942 - People of the Phil. v. Norberto Delim


G.R. No. 176153 - People of the Phil. v. Oligario Balonzo

G.R. No. 176262 - People of the Phil. v. Edilberto Torres, et al.

G.R. No. 176267 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. RANDY ALABADO y DAVID

G.R. No. 176528 - People of the Phil v. Moriel Sancho Y De Pedro

G.R. No. 176290 - Systra Phil, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

G.R. No. 176632 Formerly G.R. NOS. 151570-71 - The People of the Phil. v. Roberto Gingos Y Latabi, et al.

G.R. No. 176633 - PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ARMANDO SAN ANTONIO, JR.

G.R. No. 177769 - People of the Phil. v. Jonas Bustamante

Copyright © 1995 - 2020 REDiaz

You might also like