Effect of H2O2 on Catalase Activity
Effect of H2O2 on Catalase Activity
What is the effect of increasing concentration of substrate being hydrogen peroxide (1%, 1.5%,
2%, 2.5% and 3%) on enzymatic activity of catalase in dried yeast measured by the amount of
oxygen gas (cm 3) produced when reacted together after 1 minute?
1.0 Introduction
1.1 RESEARCH QUESTION
What is the effect of increasing concentration of substrate being hydrogen peroxide (1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5% and 3%) on
enzymatic activity of catalase in dried yeast measured by the amount of oxygen gas (cm3) produced when reacted
together after 1 minute?
Enzymes are a globular protein that act as a catalyst in biochemical reactions occurring in the body to produce product
essential for daily human life functions. An enzyme’s main function is to work as catalysts by speeding up chemical
reactions by reducing activation energy without being self-involved and convert reactants known as substrates into
products for the body to utilise.
Enzymes are protein macromolecules with a defined three-dimensional structure (Wikiversity , 2019). They consist of a
numerous amount of amino acids linked together by peptide bonds forming a polypeptide (Wikiversity , 2019). Enzymes
catalyse reactants into products through a region on the surface of the enzyme called the active site. The active site
shape permits binding only of a specific molecular substrate that then undergoes catalysis (Merriam-Webster , 2019). The
binding of the substrate to the active site leads to the reaction being catalysed and products formed and released. Figure
1 illustrates below.
There are two proposed theories explaining how substrates bind to the active site in order to form products referred to as
enzyme-substrate specificity. Specificity is the ability of an enzyme to choose exact substrate from a group of similar
molecules, operating through the structural and chemical complementarity between enzyme and substrate
(easybiologyclass, 2019).
The first theory is known as the lock key hypothesis, outlining that both a substrate and an enzyme have specific
geometric shapes that fit exactly into each other and if the substrate does not align the physical structure of the active site,
1
catalysis will not occur. However, this hypothesis did not explain the stabilization of the enzyme and hence the induced fit
model better illustrates binding and catalysis of enzymes and substrates (Klazema, 2014).
The induced fit model states that a chemical attraction between the substrate and enzyme occur when a substrate
approaches the enzyme, forcing a conformational change in the structure of the active site allowing it to bind and products
to form through catalysis.
Products are formed when a substrate and active site bind together via collisions. Collisions are the binding of substrates
to active sites of enzymes. Enzymatic activity (rate of reaction of enzymes producing products) is heavily reliant on the
level of collisions occurring, as an increase in the number of collisions will lead to the formation of more products faster
and visa versa. Multiple factors influence the number of collisions that occur, consisting of, temperature, pH level and
substrate concentration. This investigation will specifically be focusing on substrate concentration.
Substrate concentration is the amount of substrate/reactants present in the reaction that have the potential to be turned
into products (Study.com, 2019). The higher the amount of substrate present in the reaction the more chance of collisions
occurring will be present and hence the rate at which the collision occur will increase, increasing reaction rate, as the
probability of collisions will increase sue to more substrates being present. However, optimum concentration of substrates
in a reaction can cause active sites to be occupied and fully working at maximum efficiency. As illustrated in figure 4. The
collisions become constant and do not increase due to no active sites being available for catalysis.
2
                                Figure 4: Image illustrating the increase of substrate
                                concentration in a reaction and its affect on reaction rate.
In this investigation, will focus on the enzyme catalase in the reaction between catalase and hydrogen peroxide. In our
bodies, cells produce the enzyme of catalase to remove hydrogen peroxide from the body as hydrogen peroxide is a by-
product of respiration in any organism exposed to oxygen, is harmful and must be removed as soon as it is produced by
the cell (Nuffield Foundation , 2019). This reaction is as follows,
                                                        𝐶𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑒
                                   𝐻𝑦𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑒𝑛 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑥𝑖𝑑𝑒               𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 + 𝑂𝑥𝑦𝑔𝑒𝑛 𝐺𝑎𝑠
2𝐻2 𝑂2 → 𝐻2 𝑂 + 𝑂2
This investigation will investigate the effect of changing the substrate concentration of catalase on the production of
oxygen gas. Dried yeast will be playing the role of catalase and a water displacement method will be used to measure and
collect the oxygen gas produced. The substrate concentration will be investigated through changing the concentration of
hydrogen peroxide in intervals of 0.5%, from 1% up to 3% (1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5% and 3%). The equation of this reaction is
as follows,
𝐶19 𝐻14 𝑂2 + 𝐻2 𝑂2 → 𝐻2 𝑂 + 𝑂2
1.3 HYPOTHESIS
By increasing the substrate concentration of hydrogen peroxide in the reaction, the rate of reaction and oxygen gas
production will increase as the concentration percentage of hydrogen peroxide increases. This will occur due to, more
substrates in the reaction being present allowing for more margin of collisions to occur as there are more substrates that
can bind and catalyse to the active site of the enzyme. As a result of increased substrates, the reaction rate will also
increase as the active sites will be consecutively binding and producing oxygen gas because more substrates will be
colliding due to the increase in reactant numbers.
1.4 VARIABLES
Independent Variable:
    ● Hydrogen peroxide concentration (1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5% and 3%)
Dependent Variable:
   ● Oxygen mass (g) (± 5cm3)
3
1.5 CONTROLS
     Variables      Variables Measured            Possible effect on data               How the variable will be
                                                                                     changed/ measured/ controlled
     Controlled    pH level of hydrogen      Difference in pH levels across the     The pH level of all hydrogen
     Variables     peroxide                  hydrogen peroxide concentrations       peroxide concentrations used will
                                             used can be different from optimum     be ensured to be kept the same.
                                             pH level impacting the
                                             concentration of hydrogen ions
                                             present in the solution and reacting
                                             with the yeast causing structural
                                             changes and potential denaturation
                                             of enzyme leading to a significant
                                             change and inaccuracy in reaction
                                             rate and production of oxygen gas.
                   Amount of hydrogen        Variations in the amount of            The hydrogen peroxide volume was
                   peroxide measured and     hydrogen peroxide in the reaction      kept the same across all trials of a
                   used in experiment –      will lead to an unfair test as more    volume of 20 ml.
                   20ml                      volume of hydrogen peroxide will
                                             lead to more solution for the yeast
                                             to react with hence altering the
                                             reaction rate and production of
                                             oxygen gas production.
                   Amount of yeast used in   Variation in the amount of yeast       The yeast mass measured present
                   the reaction – 2g         measured in the reaction will lead     in the reaction was kept the same
                                             to an unfair test as there will be     across all trials of 2 grams.
                                             more enzymes present in the yeast
                                             to react in the reaction leading to
                                             inaccuracy in the reaction rate and
                                             production of oxygen gas.
                   Time                      The experiment would result in an      1 minute was dedicated to all trials
                                             unfair test if the time for reaction   for which the reaction was
                                             allowed to each trial was different,   measured through the water
                                             because some trials would be           displacement method.
                                             dedicated more or less time for the
                                             reaction leading to less or more
                                             oxygen gas production making the
                                             results inaccurate.
    Uncontrolled   Temperature of            Data was gathered over 2 days          The experiment occurred in a
     Variables     experimental conditions   both in the morning and afternoon      enclosed room restoring similar
                                             therefore, the temperature of the      temperature conditions therefore,
                                             room the experiment was                minimal impact of the reaction rate
                                             conducted under had fluctuations.      of the solution.
                                             This could cause the reaction of the
                                             yeast and hydrogen peroxide to
                                             either slow down or speed up
                                             according to the temperature
                                             because excess or not enough
                                             kinetic energy from temperature
                                             was present impacting the solution.
4
1.6 MATERIALS
    1. 1x clamp and stand                                             10. 1x 250ml measuring cylinder (± 5cm 3)
    2. 1x electronic balance (±0.01)                                  11. 1x pipette
    3. 1x 100ml hydrogen peroxide (1%)                                12. 1x plastic tray
    4. 1x 100ml hydrogen peroxide (1.5%)                              13. 1x plastic tube
    5. 1x 100ml hydrogen peroxide (2%)                                14. 1x rubber topper
    6. 1x 100ml hydrogen peroxide (2.5%)                              15. 1x stopwatch
    7. 1x 100ml hydrogen peroxide (3%)                                16. 2x 250ml beaker
    8. 1x Lowan yeast dried instant                                   17. 5x 50ml beaker
    9. 1x 25ml measuring cylinder (± 0.5cm 3)                         18. 5x 250ml conical flask
1.7 PROCEDURE
    1. A mortar and pestle were used to grind the yeast until it became a fine powder which was lighter in colour and
        less grainy than the original.
    2. A balance was used to measure 2 grams of yeast and placed in a 50ml beaker.
    3. 20ml of 1% hydrogen peroxide was measured into a 25ml measuring cylinder and poured into a 250ml conical
        flask, where the reaction would take place.
    4. The plastic tray was half filled with tap water, ready for the water displacement.
    5. The 250ml measuring cylinder was filled with water and inverted in over the tray of water, with the open end under
        the surface of the water in the tray and with the end of the rubber tubing in the measuring cylinder. Clamp was put
        in place to stabilise the structure.
    8. After 1 minute, the rubber bung was pulled out from the conical flask and the volume of oxygen was recorded.
    9. These steps were repeated for four more times, consisting of five trials for each concentration.
    10. Steps 1-9 were completed for hydrogen peroxide concentrations, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5% and 3%.
5
1.8 SAFETY, ETHICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
    Concerns                                Potential Hazard                             Control Measures and Management
Safety
    Glassware                               The use of glassware may lead to             Lab coats, safety goggles and leather
                                            breakage leading to potential chance         shows must be worn at all times to
                                            of hurts on skin.                            ensure glass fragments do not come
                                                                                         in direct contact with skin to cause
                                                                                         cuts and injuries. Need to be careful
                                                                                         whilst dealing with glassware during
                                                                                         experiment.
    Hydrogen Peroxide                       Direct contact of solution with skin or      Lab coats, leather shoes and safety
                                            body can cause minor to fatal burns          glasses must be worn at all times
                                            and/or irritation and breathing difficulty   ensuring that the solution does not go
                                            due to its high corrosive properties         into eyes or come in contact with skin
                                            and toxic nature.                            casing irritation and injuries.
    Yeast                                   Small yeast particles and unpleasant         Lab coats and safety glasses should
                                            fumes from the yeast can cause               be worn at all times ensuring that
                                            irritation to those suffering from           particles do not come in contact with
                                            asthma and yeast allergies. The small        eyes as well as regulation of fresh air
                                            particles can cause irritation in eyes.      in the lab whilst performing the
                                                                                         experiment.
Environmental
    Waste Management                        Hydrogen Peroxide is a toxic solution        Waste discarded from this experiment
                                            which if disposed freely into the            was disposed according to Education
                                            environment via the sink or other            Queensland’s disposal methods and
                                            generic disposal methods might               safely disposed making sure it was
                                            negatively impact the environment            not disposed into the environment
                                            and affect ecosystems by damaging,           harming the ecosystems.
                                            disease or toxic poisoning.
Ethical
No ethical concerns were identified in this investigation as no human or animal contents were breached.
6
2.0 Analysis
2.1 QUALITATIVE DATA
    ●   When reacting with the hydrogen peroxide the yeast expands to create bubble type structures with air as
        demonstrates figure 6.
● After the reaction, the solution had very unpleasant smelling odour.
● The mixture turned into the colour of yeast after mixing, the colour was yellowish biscuit colour with multiple bubbles.
7
    Figure 7: 2.5% of hydrogen peroxide           Figure 8: 1% of hydrogen peroxide concentration after reaction.
    after reaction. Filling up nearly half the    Barely touching a quarter of the way through the conical flask
    conical flask with the reaction bubbles       with the bubbles formed from the reaction.
    formed.
●   The height of the bubbles created after the reaction increased as the substrate concentration of hydrogen peroxide
    increased, as shown with figures 7 and 8.
●   The gas collection in the 250ml measuring cylinder increased in speed as the concentration increased, it was quicker
    and faster compared to lower concentrations.
● Minimal precipitate was seen to be formed during the experiment on the sides and on the top surface of the reaction.
8
                                        Figure 9: A foam layer created on top of
                                        the mixture by the yeast reacting with the
                                        hydrogen peroxide.
●    A foam like surface was formed on the top of the reaction creating a cloud of the top of the mixture, as shown in figure
     9.
1% 68 59 66 63 70
1.5% 96 91 95 95 93
9
2.3 QUANTITATIVE DATA – PROCESSED DATA
Table 2: Sample calculation values and examples for mean, standard deviation and t-test.
Calculation Example
                     ∑
                     𝑥                                                           ∑    𝑥
              𝜇=                                                          𝜇=
                  𝑛                                                                𝑛
             𝑆𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠                                         68 + 59 + 66 + 63 + 70
      𝑀𝑒𝑎𝑛 =                                                         =
             𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠                                                     5
                                                                           𝜇 = 65.2𝑐𝑚3
 Standard Deviation                       Standard deviation for 1% hydrogen peroxide
                 ∑       (𝑥 − 𝜇)2                                            ∑       (𝑥 − 𝜇)2
          𝜎= √                                                        𝜎= √
                         𝑛                                                           𝑛
 Where,
                                                                 ∑   ((68 + 59 + 66 + 63 + 70) − 65.2)2
                                                          𝜎= √
        𝜎 = 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛                                                     4
                                                                            𝜎 = 4.32
            ∑        = 𝑆𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓
10
Table 3: Table of processed data values consisting of mean and standard deviation for all concentrations of hydrogen
peroxide.
1% 65.20 4.32
2% 153.40 2.07
3% 240.40 2.88
11
2.4 GRAPHS
                                         250
                                         240
                                         230
                                         220
                                         210
     Oxygen Gas Produced (cm3) (±5cm3)
                                         200
                                         190
                                         180
                                         170
                                         160                                                           y = 87.96x - 28.64
                                         150                                                              R² = 0.9874
                                         140
                                         130
                                         120
                                         110
                                         100
                                          90
                                          80
                                          70
                                          60
                                          50
                                          40
                                          30
                                          20
                                          10
                                           0
                                               0   0.5   1          1.5             2            2.5            3           3.5
                                                             Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration %
Graph 1: Mean values of oxygen gas produced correlated with hydrogen peroxide concentration values, with depicted
linear trendline, r-squared value, equation of line-of-best-fit and error bars of 1 positive and 1 negative error margin.
2.5 ANALYSIS
Graph 1 depicts the correlation between the measured oxygen gas production form the reaction and increasing substrate
concentration of hydrogen peroxide. The individual data points depict a linear correlation as all points illustrate that as the
concentration of hydrogen peroxide increases the amount of oxygen gas produced increases to. Which is further
supported by the linear trendline, providing a clear view of the linear trend amongst the data. The linear trend can be
further supported by the analysis of the r-squared value which is 0.9874, meaning that the data highly corresponds with
each other, confirming the strong positive linear correlation.
From the graph it can be determined that the effect of increasing the concentration of hydrogen peroxide has led to an
increase in enzymatic activity of catalase present in the yeast indicating implying that the production of oxygen gas ha
increase, which can be seen through the graph.
The standard deviation error bars on the graph depict that minimum error has occurred because the error bars are very
small in length and suggesting that the data is accurate and précised.
The positive gradient of the linear trendline also depicts that the rate of reaction was strong and fast and increased as the
concentration of hydrogen peroxide increased.
Table 4 regarding the t-test has derived two hypotheses, consisting of a null hypothesis and an alternate hypothesis.
The null hypothesis states that, there is no significant difference between 1% hydrogen peroxide concentration and 3%
hydrogen peroxide concentration. Whereas the alternate hypothesis states that, there is a significant difference between
the 1% hydrogen peroxide concentration and 3% hydrogen peroxide concentration.
The mean value for oxygen mass production in 1% concentration was 65.2 ml and mean value for 3% hydrogen peroxide
concentration was 240.4ml. The standard deviation was 4.32 and 2.88, indicating the large spread of data. The difference
12
between the two data values was significantly different as the t-test value was above 0.05, indicating that there was a
significant difference. Implying that the increase in substrate concentration harshly impacted the production of oxygen
gas.
3.0 Evaluation
3.1 DISCUSSION
The results suggest an increase in oxygen gas production as the substrate concentration of hydrogen peroxide increases.
This is due to the number of substrates present in the reaction that then stems on to the amount of collisions occurring
resulting in products forming which is the oxygen gas. As the concentration of hydrogen peroxide increased there were
more substrates present in the reaction to collide with the active site and produce oxygen gas, hence the oxygen gas
production increased as the hydrogen peroxide concentration increased. The rate of reaction of enzymatic activity also
increased because there were more substrates present which signified a greater population of reactants and hence the
collisions kept on occurring making the reaction rate increase.
This is supported by Sam Adam Day, stating that, “Increasing Substrate Concentration increases the rate of reaction. This
is because more substrate molecules will be colliding with enzyme molecules, so more product will be formed.” (Day,
2019)
As a result, more production formation was clearly evident in the results gathered and hence it can be concluded that the
rate of reaction had increased as the concentration increased and more collisions in the reaction were occurring due to
more presence of substrates.
However, the continuous inclining trend on the graph suggested that the active site of enzymes was not yet working at
optimum caliber because there was no declining of gradient suggesting that the active sites were occupied and too much
substrate was present in the reaction.
The investigation that was conducted included many weaknesses and strengths. The strengths of the investigation
consisted of repeating five trials for each concentration enabling us to gather accurate and precise results leading to the
minimization of random error present in the trials and confirming the validity of the results. All trials were performed for 1
minute providing sufficient time for the reaction to occur and all the possible produced oxygen gas to be collected so
accurate a precise results are gathered. A strength of the experiment was that it was reliable as all the controlled variables
were controlled very well providing a very niche margin for errors that could impact accuracy and precision of results.
Very few weaknesses stemmed from this investigation, especially considering the results gathered. However, some
weaknesses identified in the experiment were,
13
            Source of Error                          Impact on Results                             Improvements
Systematic Error
 After each trial of each experiment the    This could have lead to the hydrogen       This can be avoided by using a fresh
 conical flask the reaction was taking      peroxide and yeast reacting with           conical flask for each trial. Therefore,
 place in had to be rinsed and              water at the same time s each other,       the conical flask in the previous trial
 therefore left a residue of water. As a    leading to inconsistencies in the          will not be used allowing no water to
 result, for each concentration of trials   results. This could have also lead to      be present in the reaction.
 one and two the reaction also              the hydrogen peroxide reacting with
 consisted of water.                        the after first because it was placed in   Or the flask could be rinsed, and
                                            the flask before the yeast, potentially    residue wiped down well before the
 This occurred due to the limitation in     contaminating the experiment.              use on the next trial however this
 equipment offered as each group was                                                   method cannot guarantee accuracy.
 only offered one conical flask to
 conduct all five trials.
Random Error
 Measuring the hydrogen peroxide into       The volume hydrogen peroxide in the        Use equipment that has low values of
 the conical flask may have caused          reaction could have differed from trial    uncertainty in order to reduce error.
 errors due to inaccurate measuring         to trial causing inaccuracies and un       Use a pipette to measure out exact
 because of meniscus, etc.                  precise data and casing more or less       values of volume.
                                            oxygen gas to be produced.
 Occasionally, whilst measuring the         Therefore, in some trials the yeast        Ensure the scales do not flicker, and if
 yeast the electronic scales would          may be below or above the 2g mass          that is occurring use a non-flickering
 flicker.                                   level, which had a impact on the           scales to achieve accuracy in
                                            amount of oxygen gas produced,             measurement.
                                            impacting the accuracy of the
                                            experiment.
3.2 CONCLUSION
This experiment was investigating the effect of increasing substrate concentration of hydrogen peroxide (1%, 1.5%, 2%,
2.5% and 3%) in the reaction with dried yeast, providing the enzyme of catalase, observed through measuring the amount
of oxygen gas produced by using a water displacement method.
It was predicted that by increasing the substrate concentration of hydrogen peroxide in the reaction, the rate of reaction
and oxygen gas production will increase as the concentration percentage of hydrogen peroxide increases. This will occur
due to, more substrates in the reaction being present allowing for more margin of collisions to occur as there are more
substrates that can bind and catalyse to the active site of the enzyme. As a result of increased substrates, the reaction
rate will also increase as the active sites will be consecutively binding and producing oxygen gas because more
substrates will be colliding due to the increase in reactant numbers.
The processed data gathered, and trend observed have supported my hypothesis as trends can be easily identified by the
data that oxygen gas production increases when hydrogen peroxide concentration increases. This can be further
enhanced by the quantitative and qualitative data as both forms of data support the hypothesis.
This investigation has concluded that by increasing substrate concentration the enzymatic activity of a reaction increases
as more oxygen gas was produced as concentration increased because more substrate particles were present in the
solution which allowed for a great margin of collisions to occur leading to more product formation hence explaining the
increase in oxygen gas production when hydrogen peroxide concentration increased.
14
An extension that could be provided to this investigation would be to investigate the effects of pharmaceutical drags on
enzymatic activity. This could be investigated by adding in a pharmaceutical drug such as Panadol with the yeast to
compare and contrast the oxygen gas being produced. To further enhance the investigation a t-test could be conducted to
identify if a significant difference was made by the addition of a pharmaceutical drugs on the production of oxygen gas
and if the drugs impacted the enzymatic activity, positive or negatively. A research question that could be developed for
this investigation could be, the effect of pharmaceutical drugs (Panadol) on enzymatic activity of hydrogen peroxide and
dried yeast reaction measured by the amount of oxygen gas produced. If this investigation is successful in the illustration
of the effect of pharmaceutical drugs on enzyme activity, then it would prove to be highly useful and convenient in cancer
research and further cell studies.
In order to further enhance this format of investigation, enzymatic activity on different blood glucose level concentrations
could be tested. In order to provide an insight as to how different levels of sugar present in the blood impact the body’s
ability to decompose hydrogen peroxide. Sugar has been claimed to be "sweet poison" and in some new leading
research, sugar has been claimed to be a substance that encourages cancer cell growth, hence in this investigation
different sugar levels could be tested identifying how different sugar levels may impact normal cell function, potentially
assisting in cancer and diabetic research. This could be investigated by mixing yeast and different volumes for sugar
together or using potatoes instead of yeast as the characteristics of potatoes are more human like. Glucose could be
injected into the potatoes and using the water displacement method, reacted with hydrogen peroxide and oxygen gas
production measured. A research question to this investigation would be, what is the effect of different concentrations of
glucose in potatoes on the oxygen gas production when reacted with hydrogen peroxide?
REFERENCES
Biology Dictionary . (2019). Active Site . Retrieved from Biology Dictionary : https://biologydictionary.net/active-site/
Day, S. A. (2019). Factors Affecting Enzymatic Activity . Retrieved from A-Level Notes :
         https://alevelnotes.com/notes/biology/biological-molecules/enzymes/factors-affecting-enzyme-activity
easybiologyclass. (2019). Biochemistry of Enyme Substrate Specificity and its Classification with Examples . Retrieved
        from Easy Biology Class: https://www.easybiologyclass.com/enzyme-substrate-specificity-types-classification/
Enzyme Science . (2019). Enzyme FAQ. Retrieved from Enzyme Science Exceptional Enzyme Formulas :
      https://enzyscience.com/pages/enzyme-faq
HuffPost Living . (2012, July 19). Why Does My Face Flush When I Exercise? Retrieved from Everyday Health :
       https://www.everydayhealth.com/fitness/why-does-my-face-flush-when-i-exercise.aspx
Khan Academy . (2018). Steps of Cellular Respiration . Retrieved from Khan Academy :
       https://www.khanacademy.org/science/biology/cellular-respiration-and-fermentation/overview-of-cellular-
       respiration-steps/a/steps-of-cellular-respiration
Klazema, A. (2014, June 18). Lock and Key Hypothesis: Understanding Enzymes. Retrieved from Udemy, Inc.:
       https://blog.udemy.com/lock-and-key-hypothesis/
Nuffield Foundation . (2019). Investigating an enzyme-controlled reaction: catalyse and hydrogen peroxide
        concentration. . Retrieved from Nuffield Foundation : https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/practical-
        biology/investigating-enzyme-controlled-reaction-catalase-and-hydrogen-peroxide-concentrat
Solan, J. (2017, September 11). Why Does Our Heart Rate Increase During Exercise? Retrieved from LiveStrong.com:
         https://www.livestrong.com/article/321955-my-heart-rate-rises-with-light-activity/
15
Study.com. (2019). Substrate Concentration: Definition and Effect on Enzyme Activity. Retrieved from Study.com:
        https://study.com/academy/lesson/substrate-concentration-definition-effect-on-enzyme-activity.html
Wikiversity . (2019, April 29). Enzyme structure and function. Retrieved from Wikiversity :
       https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Enzyme_structure_and_function
16