WEBVTT
00:09.520 --> 00:16.760
welcome to Kaps Live, the live streaming
lectures group from grupoKaps
00:16.760 --> 00:19.740
I'm Paco and I'll be the MC today
00:19.880 --> 00:24.700
I want to say thanks to everyone watching
00:24.860 --> 00:27.000
we do this for you
00:27.120 --> 00:30.260
the lectures that we offer come in two parts
00:30.420 --> 00:34.740
first a regular lecture were our guest
00:34.780 --> 00:38.720
he'll explain some of his thoughts,
tricks and theory's and later
00:38.720 --> 00:45.700
we'll try to go deeper into the person
with an interview. Today's guest
00:46.860 --> 00:53.760
is one of the great thinkers of modern
magic and personally I can say
00:53.760 --> 00:58.760
his writings have inspired me in the
same way as Arturo de Ascanio
00:58.760 --> 01:04.700
and there's something that everyone
here at grupo Kaps
01:04.700 --> 01:08.720
whenever magicians are arguing
about something here in Spain
01:08.720 --> 01:12.080
and there might be a discussion
or no consensus
01:12.080 --> 01:17.620
someone says anything and
finishes with "Gabi said that"
01:17.620 --> 01:22.220
and the conversation ends there,
so there must be something to it
01:22.220 --> 01:27.480
so I'm going to leave you with
him with this syllogism
01:27.480 --> 01:32.440
from his lecture notes "beyond
the method" where he states
01:32.440 --> 01:35.740
"if magic is an art that comes
from imagination
01:35.740 --> 01:40.740
and the imagination doesn't have any
tricks then neither does magic"
01:40.740 --> 01:44.340
ladies an gentleman I give you
Gabi Pareras
01:55.640 --> 02:00.240
that was great, and the
syllogism was great
02:00.240 --> 02:04.220
I couldn't have done it better
02:04.220 --> 02:08.960
Just in case I've counted all the
decks so don't get tempted
02:08.960 --> 02:14.200
a couple of notes, a little bit of cream
for the changes in temperature
02:14.200 --> 02:21.480
and the cards quality, I went back to
the beginning so I brought
02:21.480 --> 02:25.760
some first versions of tricks that
have changed over time
02:25.760 --> 02:30.760
and I have the notes so I
don't forget anything
02:31.240 --> 02:34.040
over the years I've reached the
conclusion that every trick
02:34.040 --> 02:39.220
is a permanent teacher from where
you can learn different things
02:39.320 --> 02:42.560
and like Ascanio says, as you change
the tricks changes with you
02:42.680 --> 02:45.340
you have to grow old with your
repertoire or at least part of it
02:45.340 --> 02:49.240
because it marks stages of growth,
development and evolution
02:49.440 --> 02:52.980
So those tricks are there
for infinite reasons
02:52.980 --> 02:57.980
that's why I say that I could spend 3
hours or 4 days with 1 just trick
02:57.980 --> 03:01.520
because even the smallest trick
can teach you a whole lot
03:01.520 --> 03:06.840
because it contains all of magic
and all you can think of it
03:06.920 --> 03:11.220
very very concentrated, maybe you
have to scratch the surface a bit
03:11.220 --> 03:12.640
but it's there
03:12.640 --> 03:18.080
so the idea of the trick as
a teacher is fantastic
03:18.680 --> 03:23.200
and some tricks like the
ones I brought today
03:23.200 --> 03:28.900
reflect this process of evolution
03:28.900 --> 03:32.960
over the years, how they started
03:33.060 --> 03:38.200
why they appeared? what was I looking
for? and how they've changed
03:38.200 --> 03:41.580
refining and polishing and meeting
all the requirements
03:41.580 --> 03:45.580
from the greatest teacher in my
opinion, Arturo de Ascanio
03:45.580 --> 03:49.320
the concept of economy and
clarity, always in balance
03:49.320 --> 03:52.480
very subtle and delicate that you
have to find in every trick
03:52.480 --> 03:57.480
because there's no template so you
have to become aware of it
03:57.480 --> 04:00.020
so you can find that constant balance
04:00.020 --> 04:04.360
to be able to see the whole trick
04:04.360 --> 04:09.200
in clarity, economy and the slowness
04:09.200 --> 04:11.760
if something cannot be done
slowly it doesn't mean
04:11.760 --> 04:16.420
that it has to be done slowly, but
if you can't measure the rhythm
04:16.420 --> 04:18.040
then it hasn't been well conceived
04:18.040 --> 04:21.460
I explain, it is not mandatory
to do everything slowly
04:21.460 --> 04:25.160
but you have to be able
to do it in a rhythm
04:25.160 --> 04:28.180
that can be beneficial for you
04:28.280 --> 04:32.520
because of the patter, the structure,
the cover or whatever
04:32.520 --> 04:37.180
so there's a tendency to dominate the trick
04:37.180 --> 04:41.580
you rule over the trick and the
trick can never rule over you
04:41.580 --> 04:44.800
because otherwise the you end up with
what he called the "maquinita"
04:44.800 --> 04:49.840
and that was inspired by Dai Vernon
04:49.840 --> 04:55.080
because when he did a sleight,
in order to cover it
04:55.080 --> 05:00.760
it needed another, and then
another so it went like...
05:00.760 --> 05:03.120
until the trick was over so there
were no pauses, no times
05:03.120 --> 05:07.480
no resting zones, where you can relax
05:07.480 --> 05:12.000
and just stop for a certain amount
of time and then continue
05:12.000 --> 05:16.000
measuring it artistically and dramatically
according to the circumstances
05:16.660 --> 05:22.640
so let's start with a trick,
here I wrote 4 things
05:24.680 --> 05:30.060
"some tricks are always with us
and we put into them the"
05:30.240 --> 05:37.800
-what does it say?
-"the distillation of what we are
05:37.800 --> 05:40.980
having time as an ally"
05:40.980 --> 05:44.400
its a beautiful phrase if you say
it like you're improvising
05:44.400 --> 05:49.400
but I couldn't, but keep it because
it's beautiful, so let's start
05:49.400 --> 05:54.400
I'll start with the spread triumph
05:54.400 --> 06:00.940
I have a funny story with Lennart Green
in Mexico we went there with
06:05.680 --> 06:09.620
with... whats your name?
Dani? yes, Dani daOrtiz
06:09.620 --> 06:16.500
every morning in the hotel I do the trick
for him and he goes like this
06:17.580 --> 06:21.500
I don't speak English so he just went
like that, so I did it again
06:22.760 --> 06:28.320
and we spent the whole morning like
that, he loved the move
06:28.320 --> 06:33.080
so it left a good taste in my mouth,
so the trick goes like this
06:33.080 --> 06:37.400
someone picks a card, anyone
06:37.400 --> 06:42.400
look a it, remember it, the classic
procedure, and put it back
06:42.400 --> 06:47.400
it is very important that everybody
sees the card
06:47.400 --> 06:54.140
so we square it and we cut
and shuffle like this
06:54.140 --> 06:57.800
well shuffled like this
06:57.800 --> 07:03.360
all cards well shuffled all the way
07:03.360 --> 07:08.360
this would be the traditional shuffle,
but there's another way
07:08.360 --> 07:14.820
were some of the cards go face down
and some of the cards go face up
07:14.820 --> 07:21.760
and now we shuffle the same way, cards
face up and cards face down
07:23.580 --> 07:31.160
so inevitably there are cards face
up and face down all mixed up
07:32.420 --> 07:35.540
but it's just a matter of snapping
the fingers over the deck
07:35.540 --> 07:41.220
the only snap you'll see in the lecture,
it only works for this, there
07:41.360 --> 07:44.980
so all the cards collude and turn
themselves in the same direction
07:44.980 --> 07:54.020
well, not every cards, all but one
because the deck remembers you
07:54.140 --> 07:56.820
because the deck remembers you.
07:56.820 --> 07:59.040
-what was the card?
- Ace of hearts
07:59.140 --> 08:03.820
and there you have exactly
the Ace of hearts
08:07.500 --> 08:10.400
this is as a great example, my version of the triumph
08:10.400 --> 08:15.400
what Lennart wanted to do all the time
was the secret packet turnover
08:15.400 --> 08:17.720
many interesting things about this trick
08:17.720 --> 08:24.460
one is that it came out years ago
when there was an idea
08:24.560 --> 08:27.980
of turning the packets in opposite
directions, something like this
08:27.980 --> 08:32.080
but I didn't like that at all
08:32.080 --> 08:35.000
so I started looking for an
answer and I found this.
08:35.000 --> 08:40.000
and always thanks to Ascanio because
he could conceptually position you
08:40.000 --> 08:45.000
this has a lot to do with creative processes
so reading over the years
08:45.000 --> 08:48.780
for example a very interesting
but complicated author
08:48.780 --> 08:51.160
called Luigi Pareyson, I don't
know if that rings a bell
08:51.160 --> 08:55.280
Umberto Eco's book "the open
work" is based on him
08:55.380 --> 08:56.900
published during the 70's
08:56.980 --> 09:00.040
there he talks about the "formed
work" and the "forming work"
09:00.040 --> 09:03.380
so I'm using big words here but
when you know the meaning
09:03.380 --> 09:06.120
you stop being afraid. So he says
there are two processes
09:06.220 --> 09:08.180
the process of the created work
09:08.180 --> 09:13.240
and the process while the work
is still yet to be revealed
09:13.240 --> 09:16.500
so he says that the artist's
view is very foggy
09:16.500 --> 09:19.540
and as he gets closer, the
view becomes clear
09:19.540 --> 09:21.520
he is zoning in what he wants
09:21.520 --> 09:26.900
but the end itself is always blurry,
if you can see the end clearly
09:26.900 --> 09:30.160
maybe its not a good sign, the
creative process is very blurry
09:30.160 --> 09:32.540
but what you can see clearly
is what you don't want
09:32.540 --> 09:37.540
and Ascanio was great about that
because you were always aware
09:37.540 --> 09:43.180
so you always know what you don't want
09:43.180 --> 09:46.920
so once you've placed all your "don'ts"
09:46.920 --> 09:50.320
the fog starts to clear out
and the formed work
09:50.320 --> 09:54.320
starts to appear in front of your
eyes and then you refine it
09:54.380 --> 09:56.200
until it's done
09:56.200 --> 09:59.940
So Ascanio is very good at that and
has great guidelines to follow
09:59.940 --> 10:03.200
so this is one of the first versions of
the triumph that I released
10:03.200 --> 10:08.200
around 20 years ago, well for me
everything is 20 years ago
10:08.200 --> 10:13.400
because now I'm old enough so that
everything around me is old
10:13.400 --> 10:15.020
anyway
10:15.020 --> 10:18.700
this meets a condition that
I think is essential
10:18.700 --> 10:23.700
for the internal inspiration and natural
suppression of the inner self
10:23.700 --> 10:26.080
and also to communicate better
to the audience, which is
10:26.080 --> 10:29.500
tricks must be beautiful both inside
and outside, not only outside
10:29.500 --> 10:32.920
so on the outside it can be great
10:32.920 --> 10:34.940
whatever you want
10:34.940 --> 10:39.340
but when you feel how the moves, techniques
and the handling flow together
10:39.460 --> 10:40.580
and how they develop
10:40.580 --> 10:48.040
which is what happens with
this trick it was a lot drier
10:48.040 --> 10:48.980
internally,
10:48.980 --> 10:55.120
but I didn't have any pretensions when
I started to conceive the idea
10:55.120 --> 10:57.860
if you're sensitive to it and you need it.
10:57.860 --> 11:02.300
then the inner and outer structures
come together aesthetically
11:02.300 --> 11:05.680
and that is very inspiring to
share and communicate
11:05.680 --> 11:08.980
which is the real reason why
people should do magic
11:08.980 --> 11:13.340
that you can't not do it, a lot of
writers and artists say that
11:13.420 --> 11:18.400
like in "letters to a young poet"
by Rainer Maria Rilke
11:18.600 --> 11:23.340
one of the first questions he asks a young
poet whom he writes letters to
11:23.460 --> 11:27.140
he asks the essential question.
could you not write poetry?
11:27.140 --> 11:31.940
if you can then don't do it.
11:31.940 --> 11:38.100
it makes no sense, so, can
you not do magic?
11:38.100 --> 11:42.320
because if you can then
look for something else
11:42.320 --> 11:44.340
that's how it is
11:44.340 --> 11:47.020
so let's talk about the trick
11:47.020 --> 11:54.500
it comes from how the techniques
come together in this version
11:54.500 --> 11:57.460
and what Ascanio called the gliding
look which a subtle concept
11:57.460 --> 12:01.200
the look glides because
12:01.200 --> 12:06.100
it like surfing on top of the aesthetics
12:06.100 --> 12:08.980
that's being expressed through the handling
12:08.980 --> 12:11.900
it's not beautiful or aesthetic
in the literal sense
12:11.900 --> 12:15.820
it's just like Juan (Tamariz) talks
about the implicit humor
12:15.820 --> 12:20.820
curiously nobody talks about
the implicit beauty of a trick
12:20.820 --> 12:23.780
which is something that beats
and comes from inside
12:23.780 --> 12:27.020
it's not like you have to embellish
it or do something
12:27.020 --> 12:28.980
to give it an added beauty
12:28.980 --> 12:34.140
just like the implicit humor, if you add a
joke, it comes from outside
12:34.140 --> 12:36.540
and Juan (Tamariz) talked about
the implicit humor
12:36.540 --> 12:40.340
which the most powerful cover and
that comes from the trick itself
12:40.340 --> 12:42.220
from the absurd comes the laugh
12:42.220 --> 12:46.300
or with any another ingredient
of dramatic character
12:46.300 --> 12:51.760
it can also have that which is
inherent to the trick itself
12:51.760 --> 12:52.980
it comes out of its own construction
12:52.980 --> 12:54.660
and while you build it you can look for it
12:54.660 --> 12:57.720
that subtle beauty that causes
the gliding look
12:57.720 --> 13:02.420
which is a detached and carefree
look about the trick
13:02.420 --> 13:06.620
which is the same needed
in an aesthetic experience
13:06.620 --> 13:10.300
there has to be a moral, technical
or practical distance
13:10.300 --> 13:15.020
so you can focus on the magic and
whats essential to the trick
13:15.020 --> 13:19.420
if you see a painting with
a couple of peasants
13:19.420 --> 13:22.680
burying their dead child in
a barren landscape
13:22.680 --> 13:26.740
with a wooden cart that you can see
was used to move the body
13:26.740 --> 13:31.500
beyond all that tragedy with
dark shades and sadness
13:31.500 --> 13:38.580
if you only focus on the theme then you
won't see the aesthetic form
13:38.580 --> 13:40.940
you won't see it
13:40.940 --> 13:45.040
you have to learn to distance yourself
and change the way you look at it
13:45.040 --> 13:47.860
in magic we have to incite
that point of view
13:47.860 --> 13:51.200
we cannot wait for it to come, we
have to suggest it ourselves
13:51.200 --> 13:55.820
and in this case is the aesthetic
or the magic look
13:55.820 --> 13:57.660
the way of constructing or composing
13:57.660 --> 14:02.500
looking for a gliding look
achieves just that
14:02.500 --> 14:07.220
it helps so that everything can be seen
14:07.220 --> 14:10.420
all the ingredients must be
in their right proportion
14:10.420 --> 14:13.500
if you put more pepper than salt something
it's not going to work out
14:13.500 --> 14:16.640
it's a balance between the whole of them,
not just one over the others
14:16.640 --> 14:20.460
it's just the right amount
of each ingredient
14:20.560 --> 14:24.000
that also appear to be constant
and permanent
14:24.000 --> 14:27.060
because even if doctors tell
you you can't have salt
14:27.060 --> 14:31.780
it's difficult to quit because
it's used for everything
14:31.920 --> 14:36.400
so it's similar to that, there are ingredients
that have to be there
14:36.400 --> 14:41.140
then the attitude, personality
and how you present it
14:41.140 --> 14:42.740
has to do with other factors
14:42.900 --> 14:45.880
but on a composition level it doesn't
14:45.880 --> 14:50.540
so let's try to express
this idea right here
14:50.540 --> 14:55.360
this came from some modifications
of well known techniques
14:55.360 --> 14:58.740
it also has to do with the magic courses
14:58.740 --> 15:00.360
I used to teach 9 years ago in Barcelona
15:00.360 --> 15:05.300
because I have the privilege of going
40 times through the same place
15:05.300 --> 15:08.420
where most magicians don't go
because they don't have to
15:08.420 --> 15:12.180
I revisit the Vernon's books
many times a year
15:12.180 --> 15:17.960
so I know every crack,
every building block
15:17.960 --> 15:23.960
every alley where people
only go through once
15:23.960 --> 15:30.040
so I know everything about the
trick and I keep on looking
15:30.040 --> 15:34.380
and I get insight that is impossible
to get unless
15:34.380 --> 15:38.220
you go back to it frequently and
that also other can understand
15:38.220 --> 15:44.980
if you can teach it to others is
because you've understood it
15:44.980 --> 15:50.740
but if you can't then you don't
understand it enough
15:50.740 --> 15:54.980
to be able to explain it to someone else
15:54.980 --> 15:56.900
so teaching classes is great
15:56.900 --> 16:03.080
I think that every magician should at
least teach for a couple of years
16:03.080 --> 16:07.220
because then you can learn a lot and
show all the folded knowledge
16:07.220 --> 16:12.220
because knowledge folds itself,
it becomes unconscious
16:12.220 --> 16:15.860
and then you don't know why do you
place the deck a certain way
16:15.860 --> 16:19.220
I remember when I had to teach the spread
16:19.220 --> 16:19.340
I used to say that bicycle
cards spread themselves
I remember when I had to teach the spread
16:19.340 --> 16:22.340
I used to say that bicycle
cards spread themselves
16:22.340 --> 16:27.140
and this guy could not get it
it looked like packets
16:27.140 --> 16:35.120
it looked like little packets.
so why it isn't working?
16:35.120 --> 16:40.820
and this was very interesting because
the reason was so simple
16:40.820 --> 16:43.380
he wasn't applying pressure
16:43.380 --> 16:45.820
does it look dumb?
16:45.820 --> 16:49.300
well I didn't knew how to teach
the spread correctly
16:49.300 --> 16:56.340
because to me applying pressure was
second nature so I didn't notice
16:56.340 --> 17:01.340
the gradual pressure with which you
release the cards in a spread
17:01.340 --> 17:06.340
or on a fan which are another
type of spread
17:06.340 --> 17:11.340
is a closed extension, when
you teach a fan
17:11.340 --> 17:13.340
and you say that the hand acts as
a mat and they must be spread
17:13.340 --> 17:16.340
so that they can go through the
thumb the change is amazing
17:16.340 --> 17:19.100
that process of unfolding the knowledge
17:19.100 --> 17:23.280
is very fascinating so I recommend a lot
to spend some time like that
17:23.280 --> 17:29.200
while growing up in magic, let's go back
to the trick, a card is chosen
17:29.200 --> 17:36.660
and now er are going to change the
concept of the LePaul fan control
17:36.660 --> 17:40.140
first is that I came back to this which
I hated when I started
17:40.140 --> 17:44.080
I though it looked awful
17:44.080 --> 17:49.080
it feels like the deck is growling
17:49.080 --> 17:51.980
but this has an upside too because
you can place the card anywhere
17:51.980 --> 17:55.340
so there's a free choice right there
17:55.340 --> 17:57.460
now you get to the pre-technique
17:57.460 --> 18:03.740
the pre-technique is the
pre-elmsley pre-double lift
18:03.740 --> 18:09.040
pre-control, pre-force pre-everything
and that's very good
18:09.040 --> 18:12.780
is good to understand and
justify all techniques
18:12.780 --> 18:15.100
so now you show the card to everyone
18:15.100 --> 18:17.780
and now you push it in
really, not halfway.
18:17.780 --> 18:22.400
this is crappy, and for this you
can be kicked out of magic
18:22.400 --> 18:25.220
it should be illegal and unconstitutional
18:25.220 --> 18:29.900
so if you do it you'll hear "I'm sorry
sir but you are banned for life
18:29.900 --> 18:35.960
go collect stamps or something but
stop messing with this crap"
18:35.960 --> 18:41.100
I'll change the card if its
ok, so push the card in
18:41.100 --> 18:44.100
and understand why you have to push it,
18:44.100 --> 18:45.620
because the top and bottom
cards must go down
18:45.620 --> 18:47.300
in order for the plunger to work
18:47.300 --> 18:51.900
when I understood this I realized how dumb
I was and how dumb are most
18:52.000 --> 18:53.860
this is the principle
18:53.860 --> 18:58.820
so when this moves, this card
comes out, this goes like this
18:58.820 --> 19:05.020
wait I'm going to do it the right way
19:05.020 --> 19:08.860
it goes like this, when you push
this card while pressing
19:08.860 --> 19:10.020
all of this comes down
19:10.020 --> 19:13.940
and now when you square
by turning it this turns
19:13.940 --> 19:18.600
around and when you squeeze
the card will come out
19:18.600 --> 19:23.320
it's very simple and its genius
19:23.320 --> 19:25.460
so you have to understand why it happens,
19:25.460 --> 19:28.780
and I think almost no one
uses this control
19:28.780 --> 19:31.380
first because I think is intimidating
19:31.380 --> 19:35.040
because some don't understand the move
so they just push in the card
19:35.040 --> 19:37.140
and if it doesn't work?
19:37.140 --> 19:44.620
well then practice more,
is easy to undertand
19:44.620 --> 19:49.540
but if you know the procedure you can
understand the work you're doing
19:49.540 --> 19:53.900
you check visually that it worked and
there's nothing to be afraid of
19:53.900 --> 19:58.900
now you have to squeeze here and the card
will come out, it always works
19:59.840 --> 20:03.900
not that time because I was showing you
how it fails but it always works
20:03.900 --> 20:09.380
there it is, trust me and you'll
see how life is good
20:09.380 --> 20:17.200
it works it works, I'm just
joking, this is enough
20:17.340 --> 20:20.860
well after that you can shuffle
in the hands or whatever
20:20.860 --> 20:26.660
I'll show you a variation that I like
20:26.660 --> 20:29.340
you do this, and now all you
have to do is push it
20:29.340 --> 20:32.880
how you square it is not important
20:32.880 --> 20:35.340
the position of the deck
doesn't matter either
20:35.340 --> 20:41.560
what matters is that the card
is somewhere around here
20:41.560 --> 20:50.260
so the Idea is that you push
with your index finger
20:50.260 --> 20:50.300
or with the other middle finger
20:50.300 --> 20:55.300
the card comes out the other side,
you separate it and shuffle off
20:55.300 --> 21:01.100
done lightly it would look like this,
and now it's on the bottom
21:01.100 --> 21:05.380
is a great evolution of the LePaul control
that has been overlooked
21:05.380 --> 21:09.260
if you have not analyzed a sleight
21:09.540 --> 21:16.360
it's difficult to overcome that limit,
it's good to know how it works
21:16.360 --> 21:18.740
the magician cannot go
down to the level of
21:18.740 --> 21:22.960
just pushing a button and turning on
the TV and then forget about it
21:22.960 --> 21:26.880
no, you have to open the TV
and see how it works
21:26.880 --> 21:30.380
you have to know and understand
what you have in your hands
21:30.380 --> 21:34.880
so in this case the Vernon secret turnover
was perfect for this trick
21:34.880 --> 21:43.600
so the chosen cards, now pressing with the
thumb, now you see it worked
21:43.600 --> 21:50.140
now you close it and this should
not disturb the card
21:50.140 --> 21:52.720
and now you move it to take it like this
21:54.640 --> 22:00.620
I did something wrong, I'm sorry.
the queen of diamonds
22:00.620 --> 22:05.980
pushing in, I see it, I close it, it
must protrude out the front
22:05.980 --> 22:08.980
you can see it makes a curve like this
22:08.980 --> 22:11.700
now we got to the table, press
with the index finger
22:11.700 --> 22:14.660
we push and they come out this side
22:14.660 --> 22:23.540
this is enough to make a step, I'll make
it bigger so you can see it
22:23.540 --> 22:29.800
it's very fascinating, so now when we
press using only the ring fingers
22:29.800 --> 22:34.080
we are doing a diagonal
insertion on the table
22:34.080 --> 22:42.660
if I do this, this is the diagonal insertion,
this comes down straight
22:42.660 --> 22:45.260
I call this "fluid technique"
thanks to de Bono
22:45.260 --> 22:51.380
why fluid? because you create an action
22:51.460 --> 22:58.180
and the card can't not go through
the pre-established route
22:58.180 --> 22:59.820
and that comes from the shape of the hand
22:59.820 --> 23:04.540
we place the fingers, apply pressure
and the card outjogged
23:04.540 --> 23:07.940
so that precision is what
guarantees the handling
23:07.940 --> 23:09.400
for example of the diagonal palm shift
23:09.800 --> 23:13.460
which you can do at regular speed because
you don't have to dress it up
23:13.460 --> 23:16.680
when you set a course of action
23:16.680 --> 23:20.180
the card without thinking about it
can't not do what it has to do
23:20.180 --> 23:22.140
at the time it has to do it
23:22.140 --> 23:27.060
you can do it without running or any
pauses, that's fluid technique
23:27.060 --> 23:29.340
and here it happens the same,
when you know the procedure
23:29.340 --> 23:34.860
it happens the same, if you do a
diagonal insertion from the table
23:34.860 --> 23:38.060
then the card will go in diagonally
23:38.060 --> 23:40.780
so the great thing about step on the table
23:40.780 --> 23:46.160
is that no matter how big it
is it always works
23:46.960 --> 23:52.060
but seriously, the 7 of clubs,
let's take it to the extreme
23:52.060 --> 23:59.360
there, wait let's square it first, the 3
24:01.140 --> 24:08.100
it's ok? so now I push it,
I hold it so I don't lose it
24:08.100 --> 24:11.280
and now I form a break there
it is, the 3 of clubs?
24:11.280 --> 24:19.460
there it is, but there are reasons for
that, because as small as it is
24:19.460 --> 24:27.180
when the card goes in it can't do anything
else, only the ring fingers
24:27.180 --> 24:31.560
on the outer end, just like the
push through shuffle
24:31.560 --> 24:35.900
now you have the injog and you
hold it with the index fingers
24:35.900 --> 24:38.820
so you don't lose it when
trying to find it
24:38.820 --> 24:42.360
now if you lift your thumb
there is a long card there
24:42.360 --> 24:46.340
that's all there is, is a long card,
so I take it and that's it
24:47.100 --> 24:51.880
and other stuff like "cut, please"
24:51.880 --> 24:54.560
wait, now cut
24:56.560 --> 24:59.100
this would be here, so you do this
25:00.720 --> 25:05.100
it's the same, I push it
forward, I place it on top
25:05.100 --> 25:08.020
and now I can make the jog
25:10.960 --> 25:16.560
this can be a lot smaller, I take the jog,
I cut and bring it to the top
25:17.420 --> 25:21.480
or what this guy did
25:22.820 --> 25:26.640
what's his name? the famous gambler
25:27.380 --> 25:30.680
Steve, Steve Forte
25:30.680 --> 25:34.860
he made the jog here, the rest
doesn't matter
25:37.080 --> 25:42.000
so it's all the same, now with 8 of hearts
25:42.000 --> 25:51.700
LePaul, there it is, cut and now
it's automatically in place
25:51.700 --> 25:53.320
for the Vernon secret turnover
25:53.500 --> 25:58.340
a good detail to keep in mind it's
better if there's continuity
25:58.340 --> 25:59.360
so make a spread
25:59.360 --> 26:04.100
when this comes back this hand
is already waiting and covering
26:04.100 --> 26:06.620
I made a mistake there's two cards there
26:06.620 --> 26:09.220
so let's try to equalize the packets
26:09.220 --> 26:15.160
this depends on where you subtly force
the spectator to put the card in
26:15.160 --> 26:19.620
so now you drop one card
26:19.620 --> 26:25.460
now the spread, and when you come back,
and when you are squaring it
26:26.320 --> 26:29.740
this is waiting, this is the welding
26:29.740 --> 26:36.520
and the Ascanio welding improves sleights
because they are done in transit
26:36.520 --> 26:41.220
and then the move is done, I assume you
all know the Vernon turnover
26:41.220 --> 26:44.940
and is in transit, and now
another good detail
26:44.940 --> 26:48.040
and is in transit, and now another good detail,
26:48.040 --> 26:53.800
finish always with the ring
fingers, not like this
26:53.800 --> 26:58.800
because you can end up
looking like an idiot
26:58.800 --> 27:00.100
we've done great
up until this point
27:00.100 --> 27:02.140
they took the card, the
Lepaul control is great
27:02.140 --> 27:04.460
it went to the table, it
was cut and shuffled
27:04.460 --> 27:06.320
so I'm sure that the feeling that is
produced in the spectator
27:06.320 --> 27:10.260
is very clean, the card
is lost, it disappears.
27:10.260 --> 27:12.740
and people feel that way
27:12.740 --> 27:17.180
it's not enough that it looks like
you have a coin in your hand
27:17.180 --> 27:20.500
they have to feel that
the coin is in the hand
27:20.500 --> 27:23.560
and that is a lot harder
than a false placement
27:23.560 --> 27:25.060
and that takes a lot of work
27:25.060 --> 27:29.020
doing this is a joke, this is just
to fool, and it's very crappy
27:29.020 --> 27:32.880
in order to be artistic the spectator must
feel that the coin is there
27:32.880 --> 27:35.500
there must be something
that maintains the feeling
27:35.500 --> 27:37.700
so that the spectator can't fight it
27:37.700 --> 27:41.700
the intellect can argue with
itself or with others
27:41.700 --> 27:44.920
but feelings can't question
anything, if it is then it is
27:44.920 --> 27:47.180
so if the spectator feels
that the coin is there
27:47.180 --> 27:48.100
then there's no discussion possible
27:48.100 --> 27:49.520
when you open your hand they'll die
27:49.520 --> 27:51.780
because he brought that himself
27:51.780 --> 27:54.820
when it has to do with hindsight,
reason or the intellect
27:54.820 --> 27:55.380
that's what you bring
27:55.380 --> 27:58.660
and you can't convince anyone
because you are the magician
27:58.660 --> 28:02.600
the trickster, and so how could
you convince anyone?
28:02.600 --> 28:06.940
"well shuffled deck" well if you say
it then I don't believe you
28:06.940 --> 28:10.740
but if you feel that this
is a shuffled deck
28:10.740 --> 28:14.460
and I get you ty you bring
that to the table
28:14.460 --> 28:16.940
and then I might not even
have to say anything
28:16.940 --> 28:19.380
so then we save words because
we magicians talk too much
28:19.380 --> 28:21.320
to say the same thing
28:21.320 --> 28:26.900
we are the kings of repetition, don't square
using ring and middle fingers
28:26.900 --> 28:30.180
because this is what happens
28:30.180 --> 28:35.620
can you see the card? I can't see it,
I'm sitting here like a god
28:35.620 --> 28:41.060
and everybody is looking at the card
28:41.060 --> 28:45.260
like a complete idiot
28:45.260 --> 28:48.400
and the card is showing, the guy
must be dumb obviously
28:48.400 --> 28:53.700
so you can never see it, and that happened
to me luckily with a student
28:53.700 --> 28:55.820
he said "I can see the card" and I said
28:55.820 --> 28:58.300
"you can't see anything you
don't know what I did"
28:58.300 --> 29:00.320
I always get mad first and then
29:00.320 --> 29:03.580
then I apologize
29:03.580 --> 29:09.120
so when I go like this and see it
my jaw dropped to the floor
29:09.120 --> 29:14.120
and all because of squaring like
this it may or may not happen
29:14.120 --> 29:21.580
so is very dangerous it's just
like a double on the table
29:21.580 --> 29:28.500
imagine that you can see it
perfectly from this angle
29:28.500 --> 29:31.140
but from here or here you can't see it
29:31.140 --> 29:33.500
so it's very frightening to think about it
29:33.500 --> 29:36.580
so the once the card is reversed come
the sleight that Lennart loved
29:36.580 --> 29:39.040
cut less than half from the top
29:39.040 --> 29:45.360
move both packets at the same time, don't
move just one, now spread them
29:45.360 --> 29:49.580
so this packet moves forward,
and does the butterfly wings
29:49.580 --> 29:54.260
and if that's not the name I'm
sorry, I just call it like that
29:54.340 --> 30:00.820
so we fan the cards outwards
so we can have a margin
30:00.820 --> 30:02.400
so the reversed card remains unseen
30:02.400 --> 30:08.420
that takes a little delicateness, and
this is more interesting if
30:08.420 --> 30:16.720
instead of guiding it with your
fingers just press on it
30:16.720 --> 30:23.700
so without using the finger just pressure
30:23.700 --> 30:27.700
it's more interesting, now it's
the game of susceptibilities
30:27.700 --> 30:29.560
it must be economic, clear
30:29.560 --> 30:31.620
and you must be able to do it slowly,
if you can't do it slowly
30:31.620 --> 30:36.360
then it doesn't fit the bill
30:36.360 --> 30:39.060
so maybe you need more analysis
or you have to get rid of it
30:39.060 --> 30:41.940
so cards face up and face down
30:41.940 --> 30:47.420
cards faces and cards backs,
the obtuse idea
30:47.420 --> 30:54.000
which fits very well because in the
misdirection levels of Ascanio
30:54.000 --> 30:55.580
between two points of interest
30:55.580 --> 30:58.540
dissolution, were both
are equally interesting
30:58.540 --> 30:59.980
Attraction, were one is more interesting
30:59.980 --> 31:02.300
until here, where both are in
the spectator field of view
31:02.300 --> 31:04.760
the third is complete deviation
31:04.760 --> 31:07.300
where one attracts all the attention
31:07.300 --> 31:11.020
and leaves the other one out of the field of view
31:11.020 --> 31:13.580
I think it's very clear
31:13.580 --> 31:17.080
Ascanio said that the third level
did not occur in magic
31:17.080 --> 31:19.340
I think that he made a mistake there
31:19.340 --> 31:22.260
but I think we are lucky that
his mistakes were good
31:22.260 --> 31:27.060
so even at that he was good,
that's food for thought
31:27.060 --> 31:32.700
so even when he was wrong
he gave good advice
31:32.700 --> 31:40.160
but something that is not specified
in the Ascanio Conception
31:40.160 --> 31:42.940
is that these points of interest
can be both physical
31:42.940 --> 31:45.160
mental or one of each
31:45.160 --> 31:46.700
but they're still points of interest
31:46.700 --> 31:49.700
you divide where they look on one hand
31:49.700 --> 31:52.320
and the mental attention on the other
31:52.320 --> 31:53.900
when you use an obtuse idea
31:53.900 --> 31:55.720
what happens is that the spectator attention goes inside
31:55.720 --> 32:00.100
if the spectator's looking inside you can
do a top change with the guy looking
32:00.100 --> 32:02.960
was that your card? no, is your name Pepe?
yes, what was the card? there
32:02.960 --> 32:06.100
he doesn't see anything because
he's looking inside
32:06.100 --> 32:10.340
and that's very hard because
we are very pragmatic
32:10.340 --> 32:13.700
if people are not clapping or laughing it
means that they're not liking it
32:13.700 --> 32:16.260
and sometimes we are not
capable of understanding
32:16.260 --> 32:19.440
the journey that we can take
the spectator through
32:19.440 --> 32:21.060
if they don't move is
because it isn't there
32:21.060 --> 32:25.860
it's like a joke where nobody reacts
32:25.860 --> 32:27.220
but you don't know if
they're reacting or not
32:27.220 --> 32:30.980
we have a long way to reach the point
32:30.980 --> 32:34.380
were you can tell they're
dying on the inside
32:34.380 --> 32:39.960
even if they don't show it externally
it's still happening
32:39.960 --> 32:45.020
I've never seen a guy reading a novel
32:45.020 --> 32:45.940
finishing a chapter by clapping
and screaming
32:45.940 --> 32:52.260
no, the guy just keeps reading well it's
difficult to understand that
32:52.260 --> 32:58.940
and not be so physical,
it's very difficult
32:58.940 --> 33:01.420
the introspection very is
difficult to understand
33:01.420 --> 33:02.780
but we would have to fight for it
33:02.780 --> 33:05.860
face up cards and face down
cards, we divide the attention
33:05.860 --> 33:08.960
we say cards face down and...?
33:08.960 --> 33:13.580
and now, very slowly, one hands
comes to the border of the table
33:13.580 --> 33:18.580
and lifts from behind while
the other just tilts
33:19.440 --> 33:27.200
but in the end it gives the sensation
of being in harmony
33:27.200 --> 33:31.840
that both hands are moving the same
way, there's a visual deception
33:31.840 --> 33:35.760
but you can't do this, because then you
can see clearly it's different
33:36.740 --> 33:40.760
with this you can do the Kaps force
from the secret agenda
33:40.760 --> 33:45.140
it's the same, you have to work
in a sequence of actions
33:45.140 --> 33:47.240
oriented in the same direction so it works
33:47.240 --> 33:50.740
so there must be something
that tells the spectator
33:50.740 --> 33:53.820
that you can do it slowly and its done
33:53.820 --> 33:58.820
so I spend the whole afternoon
doing this for Lennart Green
34:00.360 --> 34:05.800
he loved the fact that it was slow, you
have to learn how to do it slowly
34:05.800 --> 34:12.780
and trust it, if the magic conception
and the cover mechanisms
34:12.780 --> 34:17.200
exist and work then we have to trust them
34:17.200 --> 34:20.180
or rethink about it
34:20.180 --> 34:22.800
does the spectator looks where the
magician looks? yes or no?
34:22.800 --> 34:27.140
well trust it, use it, apply it
34:27.140 --> 34:30.420
if you move attention
in between two points
34:30.420 --> 34:33.060
the spectator doesn't see
the small discrepancies
34:33.060 --> 34:36.020
in between one and the other. yes or no?
34:36.020 --> 34:40.380
the transit action is a cover where the
spectator goes into the future
34:40.380 --> 34:43.600
so it doesn't see the present and
then you do the sleight
34:43.600 --> 34:45.160
- does it works or not?
- yes
34:45.160 --> 34:50.160
then apply it, feel comfortable
and confident about it
34:50.160 --> 34:57.540
because it's all you've got, and this
I call the "yes or yes" cover
34:57.540 --> 35:06.860
there's nothing else, this is always
covered and is for everybody
35:06.860 --> 35:11.760
it's not that "almost everybody believes it"
that's not acceptable
35:11.760 --> 35:15.580
where is your ethic? your job is
to make everyone believe
35:15.580 --> 35:17.300
and at least have the intention
35:17.300 --> 35:20.720
don't defeat yourself before trying it
if after that you can't do it
35:20.720 --> 35:25.440
the world is what it is, this
has some limitations
35:25.440 --> 35:29.660
and that's what makes magic
so peculiar and colorful
35:29.660 --> 35:34.120
but if you give up before
starting then we're all screwed
35:34.120 --> 35:36.220
you have to have the intention
35:36.220 --> 35:39.840
that it works for everybody always
35:39.840 --> 35:41.340
I give you an example
35:41.340 --> 35:47.240
like this, I'll deal some poker hands
35:47.240 --> 35:49.500
you can discard any card you like
35:49.500 --> 35:52.000
and from these tell me which
one you want me to have
35:52.000 --> 35:56.440
everybody misses it, if you do this,
maybe somebody will see it but
35:56.440 --> 36:02.540
but if I tell you "out of these" first the
frame and then the background
36:02.540 --> 36:04.760
now everybody misses it
36:05.480 --> 36:08.660
yes or yes, everybody misses
the secret turnover
36:08.660 --> 36:11.700
that's the key to the whole thing
36:11.700 --> 36:16.380
you have to try and find
the maximum cover
36:16.880 --> 36:20.600
let's see if we can finish the trick
36:22.020 --> 36:27.580
so the spread, very slowly
36:28.200 --> 36:31.540
we put them down and now instead
of doing a closed shuffle
36:31.540 --> 36:33.160
because it wasn't closed before
36:33.160 --> 36:36.020
to maintain the the formal
unit of the trick
36:36.140 --> 36:38.840
I prefer not to lift it too much
36:39.060 --> 36:47.140
I release the face up packet first so
it covers a little on the side
36:47.140 --> 36:53.740
so one packet is higher than the other
36:53.740 --> 37:00.000
covering one another. hey! pay attention
37:00.000 --> 37:05.000
I do this thing to show cards
face up and face down
37:05.000 --> 37:08.420
very clearly, now.
37:08.420 --> 37:13.020
if you do this and spread right away
37:13.020 --> 37:13.900
people can tell that this card
came from here
37:13.900 --> 37:16.260
they know, they can feel it
37:16.260 --> 37:19.500
because we spend our loves estimating
distances, weights, heights
37:19.500 --> 37:20.660
everything
37:20.660 --> 37:27.080
all the time, even when you sit you
estimate the height of your butt
37:27.080 --> 37:34.020
a step it's measured so you can bend
the knee and not hurt your back
37:34.020 --> 37:39.020
we estimate all the time and do it
automatically, we are very good at it
37:39.020 --> 37:45.780
so if you do this, the spectator can
tell where it came from the top
37:45.780 --> 37:48.820
careful with those details
37:48.820 --> 37:53.060
so we do the multiple Vegas
cut which is totally false
37:53.060 --> 37:59.900
and now you can show some cards face
up and some face down and a last cut
37:59.900 --> 38:05.740
and leave it there, so we are putting a
veil to what the spectator sees
38:05.740 --> 38:12.220
this is like when you do an Elmsley count
and the last card is seen twice
38:12.220 --> 38:19.620
if you put a veil on it that helps to hide
that, so all the black cards
38:20.860 --> 38:25.380
so you see the first three and then
you break the attention
38:25.380 --> 38:26.360
and now you continue
38:26.360 --> 38:30.380
if you do this its likely that
he can see something
38:30.380 --> 38:33.340
but of you break the attention
38:34.080 --> 38:37.620
so do it like this, don't
do this and then that
38:37.620 --> 38:40.760
it doesn't work like that
38:40.760 --> 38:45.540
go out showing the back and
it's not reveal until later
38:49.260 --> 38:53.960
and then its just a matter of presentation
38:53.960 --> 38:56.020
I like the idea of the cards colluding
38:56.020 --> 38:58.660
together because it has an
animistic component
38:58.660 --> 39:01.500
all in one direction except one,
well don't say "except one"
39:01.500 --> 39:05.200
because that's descriptive and we have
to try and show but not describe
39:06.200 --> 39:16.280
so if all the cards orient themselves
face up, and then
39:16.280 --> 39:19.220
very slowly to create what
Ascanio called "atisbo"
39:19.220 --> 39:24.020
this is a surprise. the atisbo is a
surprise stretched over time
39:24.020 --> 39:29.020
it's slower than the surprise
39:29.720 --> 39:35.420
and that is more delightful
I find it fascinating
39:35.420 --> 39:41.460
so then you say all but one because
the deck remembers you
39:41.460 --> 39:49.100
and that is a gift from the gods,
you have given him a gift
39:49.320 --> 39:56.340
that it's called elegance and
that's what we're doing here
39:56.340 --> 39:59.880
and we are giving it to the spectator
because it remembers you
39:59.880 --> 40:01.300
what could remember about you?
40:01.300 --> 40:06.500
what was your card? the 8 of hearts, and
that gives meaning to the trick
40:06.500 --> 40:16.540
thank you very much thank you very much
40:18.640 --> 40:24.260
this could be longer, another? or we
leave it at this? another? yes
40:24.260 --> 40:32.560
well among all of the triumphs
40:32.560 --> 40:40.200
there was another version that is very
interesting but over the years,
40:40.200 --> 40:45.300
just like Juan Tamariz said
about the royal assembly
40:45.300 --> 40:46.900
he said he started studying Al Koran
40:46.900 --> 40:51.660
then he published it in magia potagia
40:51.660 --> 40:57.540
I've always loved the fact
that with this tricks
40:57.540 --> 41:08.260
the masters would not
only explain the trick
41:08.260 --> 41:16.460
but they would also explain
the story behind it
41:16.460 --> 41:20.680
and how they arrive to that point
41:20.680 --> 41:27.060
and the approaches they took,
that was more interesting to me
41:27.060 --> 41:30.120
than just reading recipes for tricks
41:30.120 --> 41:36.780
and Juan says that he studied Al
Koran's version for many years
41:36.780 --> 41:38.580
just to go back to the original version
41:38.580 --> 41:46.500
maybe with something extra but
mostly the same Al Koran's trick
41:46.960 --> 41:54.740
and with Vernon's triumph it's the same,
and also Vernon's cups and balls
41:54.740 --> 41:59.740
there are many good ones and funny ones but
41:59.740 --> 42:04.740
over the years I may have published over
30 versions of the triumph and
42:04.740 --> 42:12.040
and out of those there are
29 that are worthless
42:12.040 --> 42:17.040
there's Vernon's and 29 more, or the
68th version of slow motion aces
42:17.040 --> 42:21.480
because in the end Vernon's
triumph is number one
42:21.480 --> 42:28.240
I don't know a triumph that's better
than Vernon's, sorry Dani
42:28.240 --> 42:31.660
the open triumph is wonderful
42:31.660 --> 42:34.220
kiko's version where he waves
the hand over the deck
42:34.220 --> 42:36.300
those are challenges that
are good for magicians
42:36.300 --> 42:42.340
to break limits and see where we can
go, even to sometimes discover
42:42.700 --> 42:47.160
that no matter what you do
there are some limits that
42:47.160 --> 42:55.320
that are great for byplay and for
entertainment but inside you know that
42:55.320 --> 43:01.420
we have to work harder to achieve
the purest for of the triumph
43:01.420 --> 43:04.980
and for presenting it in
a way that hits people
43:04.980 --> 43:07.660
and that goes where it needs to go
43:07.660 --> 43:14.600
so now I'll show you something
else with a color separation
43:14.600 --> 43:19.600
I started with the red and
black cards separated
43:19.600 --> 43:24.600
so I had a card chosen, you can take one
43:24.600 --> 43:29.600
put it back, do you remember the card?
43:29.600 --> 43:36.580
and now let's have a red
card chosen as well
43:36.580 --> 43:41.580
and put it back
43:41.580 --> 43:46.580
I'll shuffle the cards together like this
43:46.580 --> 43:52.740
face up cards and face down cards, but
43:52.740 --> 43:57.620
all the black cards are face up and
the red cards are face down
43:57.620 --> 44:03.380
face up and face down all the way
44:03.380 --> 44:07.820
some face up, some face
down, a complete mess
44:07.820 --> 44:12.240
but all the face up cards are black and
all the face down cards are red
44:12.240 --> 44:18.080
no matter hat we do some cards will be
face up, some will be face down
44:18.080 --> 44:21.020
as you can see, a big mess
44:21.020 --> 44:24.380
however there are two cards
lost somewhere on the pack
44:24.380 --> 44:27.140
then if we wait a little, you'll
remember this
44:27.140 --> 44:29.380
all of the cards collude to turn
themselves in the right direction
44:29.380 --> 44:31.860
but now I have to go like this
44:31.860 --> 44:35.880
and only 2 cards remain face up which
are the 7 of diamonds and the
44:35.880 --> 44:45.220
5 of spades, and the curious thing is
that even with all the shuffling
44:45.220 --> 44:49.180
the colors are separated
44:49.180 --> 44:52.640
and the black card is between the reds
and the red is between the blacks
44:52.640 --> 45:00.440
it's very interesting
45:00.440 --> 45:04.960
of course, the triumph with the
spread is closer to Vernon's
45:04.960 --> 45:07.500
is more polished but in the
end it meets the criteria
45:07.500 --> 45:09.960
if you do the double back version
45:09.960 --> 45:13.260
and as long as you show the spread
45:13.260 --> 45:15.860
and show the cards and
square everything nicely
45:15.860 --> 45:18.300
is pretty much the same line of action
45:18.300 --> 45:24.060
and in the other version it's the same,
the inner method is different
45:25.180 --> 45:29.680
but all of this is the same, I do
something else instead of this
45:29.680 --> 45:34.060
but this is Vernon's, the fine
drawing that Vernon makes
45:34.060 --> 45:36.020
the external drawing is very similar
45:36.020 --> 45:42.160
internally is the method is different but
the formal structure of the trick
45:42.160 --> 45:47.160
Vernon nailed it, instead
this one is far far away
45:47.160 --> 45:52.160
this is another thing
entirely. by the way
45:52.160 --> 45:55.940
I have to check something here, I wrote
Zarrow but there's no Zarrow here
45:55.940 --> 45:58.500
you can tell I came well prepared
45:58.500 --> 46:05.320
that's my age, the color
separation is an anecdote
46:05.320 --> 46:10.320
it's very fun to do at the table when you
want to get out of the convention
46:10.320 --> 46:15.940
because sometimes it's good
explore and find new tricks
46:15.940 --> 46:20.940
but always knowing what
you're sacrificing
46:20.940 --> 46:23.740
so, you separate the cards by color
46:23.740 --> 46:27.080
or you arrive at this condition
from a previous trick
46:27.080 --> 46:30.780
somebody picks a red card, obviously
both cards are going to the top
46:30.780 --> 46:33.620
so on the right
46:33.620 --> 46:38.620
I do the elevator shuffle control
46:38.620 --> 46:44.500
an important detail in this shuffle that
you can find in card college
46:44.500 --> 46:46.820
and it has to do with the
hierarchy of the hands
46:46.820 --> 46:51.660
one hand holds the weight of the object
46:51.760 --> 46:53.620
and the other hand holds the meaning
46:53.620 --> 46:58.420
taking this into account changes the
spectators perception of a sleight
46:58.420 --> 47:03.180
in the elevator shuffle the hands that
holds the weight is the left
47:03.180 --> 47:08.020
and the hand that holds the meaning,
the intent is the right one
47:08.020 --> 47:13.020
that means that you can mark ups
and downs look at this
47:13.020 --> 47:17.180
but if I drop down and mark up here
47:17.180 --> 47:22.180
the sensation changes completely,
this is one thing
47:22.180 --> 47:29.260
this is more ethereal, and there's
another interesting thing
47:32.920 --> 47:36.900
not this one, it's prepared
47:36.900 --> 47:41.900
this one
47:41.900 --> 47:46.900
this one is ok. look at this,
a regular shuffle
47:46.900 --> 47:51.900
elevator shuffle, regular shuffle, elevator
shuffle, regular shuffle
47:51.900 --> 47:56.900
understand?
48:03.520 --> 48:08.060
the feeling, if the spectator feels
the deck is being shuffled
48:08.060 --> 48:11.420
it doesn't matter if it's
real or not, his reality
48:11.420 --> 48:14.220
what "is" doesn't matter, it only
matters what it looks like
48:14.220 --> 48:17.620
and what should it look like
48:17.620 --> 48:22.060
whatever it is it doesn't matter, in fact if
we were congruent in what we do
48:22.060 --> 48:26.320
we would always make false shuffles and
we would always force cards
48:26.320 --> 48:29.300
always, we shouldn't care,
48:29.300 --> 48:32.860
and the fact that we care means
we have a problem of concept
48:32.860 --> 48:36.060
and understanding of this property
48:36.060 --> 48:41.620
I can force cards all day long, what's the
problem? it looks the same
48:41.620 --> 48:43.540
it's a free choice or not?
48:43.540 --> 48:46.620
because when it's a free choice
we want a plus of honesty
48:46.620 --> 48:51.620
so we fell guilty or something
because that plus
48:51.620 --> 48:56.860
is telling us that something's
not right, so, the 7
48:56.860 --> 49:02.960
there are more symptoms we are screwed,
we have to take some medication
49:02.960 --> 49:04.940
the card is controlled to the top
49:04.940 --> 49:08.880
always try to make the
spectator put the feeling
49:08.880 --> 49:13.880
and over here we end with
49:13.880 --> 49:18.880
a double undercut but with a
bonus that's very interesting
49:18.880 --> 49:21.300
it's about the step,
49:21.300 --> 49:24.860
when we control from this position
49:24.860 --> 49:27.840
the fingers are vertical you
can see from the front
49:27.840 --> 49:35.380
the best is to make a step which
we can recover later and cut
49:35.380 --> 49:41.600
and it also allow you to do this and I
still have control over the step
49:41.600 --> 49:47.360
and this is because we bevel the
packet and the left fingers
49:47.360 --> 49:54.040
we put it half way in keeping the pinky
under the face card of that packet
49:54.040 --> 50:02.360
and now we tap the side with an open
hand against the left fingers
50:03.060 --> 50:08.940
so what happens is that
the pinky creates a step
50:08.940 --> 50:14.800
this is an interesting exercise,
if we can do this
50:16.000 --> 50:20.180
then you're doing it right, and
then we apply the "T"
50:20.180 --> 50:22.800
which is also in Giobbi's book
50:22.800 --> 50:30.480
which is the side opposite to the step
50:30.480 --> 50:35.480
and the vertical pressure
which doesn't affect
50:35.480 --> 50:37.460
it doesn't matter where the step is,
50:37.460 --> 50:43.020
here it does matter, it has to
be in the opposite side
50:43.020 --> 50:49.940
so I can do this. I lost your card, is
not this one right? take one
50:49.940 --> 50:56.040
I won't say it was a force but...
50:56.040 --> 50:59.320
and there you have it and can
do anything you want
50:59.420 --> 51:03.900
so I really think that you are
getting rid of things
51:03.900 --> 51:07.760
and there are many more around,
I'll give you another example
51:07.760 --> 51:12.300
the pinky break, the pressure
with the thumb here
51:12.300 --> 51:16.340
the moment you relax because
this pressure needs a attention
51:16.340 --> 51:21.100
when you relax it's over,
you're screwed
51:21.100 --> 51:25.180
I do the "presilla" I don't know what else
to call it so that's the name
51:25.180 --> 51:27.620
curl this finger around the deck because
this doesn't need any attention
51:27.620 --> 51:33.360
it won't move ever
51:33.360 --> 51:36.420
it reminds me of the locks on
some of the public bathrooms
51:36.420 --> 51:40.480
which turn like that, maybe
you've seen them
51:40.480 --> 51:46.580
but thi is it, it's uglier
but it won't open ever
51:46.580 --> 51:50.900
if you cover this side you can
stay like this until tomorrow
51:50.900 --> 51:52.340
and you can't see the break,
but here you do
51:52.340 --> 51:57.340
because the thumb relaxes
when you forget about it
51:57.340 --> 52:00.380
those are details that we need to consider
52:00.380 --> 52:05.380
we spread a little to cover the
top one, here it doesn't matter
52:05.380 --> 52:11.200
and now we do the Vernon shuffle,
drop one face up card
52:11.200 --> 52:16.680
finish the shuffle with a face down card
52:16.680 --> 52:21.820
so when lifting the packets transfer the bottom card
52:21.820 --> 52:24.440
from one packet to the other
52:24.440 --> 52:29.660
I don't know if you can see,
it's just tilting the deck
52:29.660 --> 52:34.660
and transfer, and down again
52:35.640 --> 52:39.100
so we square
52:39.820 --> 52:43.320
and the card is transferred without
the spectator noticing
52:43.320 --> 52:49.440
so now we can spread, or you can
spread first and transfer later
52:49.440 --> 52:53.120
here we keep going with
the Vernon shuffle
52:53.120 --> 52:58.640
push everything and now every card
is in the opposite packet
52:58.640 --> 53:00.860
the only thing left is to strip out
53:00.860 --> 53:05.700
catch a break and show faces and backs
53:05.700 --> 53:10.660
this I don't know if it's
from Marlo or not
53:10.660 --> 53:15.220
or from one of his students
53:18.600 --> 53:25.640
I can't remember, however this is
very important, is very easy
53:25.640 --> 53:29.660
and now you go back to the start
53:29.660 --> 53:34.300
but here there are cards that need to go
to the center of each packet
53:34.300 --> 53:40.220
now do this but the pick it up backwards
because here is the red card
53:40.220 --> 53:42.460
so instead of coming here we go there
53:42.460 --> 53:45.220
so one of the cards is already
in place in the center
53:45.220 --> 53:53.720
and for this other cut to a face up
card, cut at the other card
53:53.720 --> 53:59.820
and done, very economic, because
the other option was
53:59.820 --> 54:02.940
the typical reverse, zarrow shuffle
54:02.940 --> 54:06.940
and multiple cuts, instead this is
infinitely more economic
54:06.940 --> 54:11.820
the first effect, both selected
cards are reversed
54:11.820 --> 54:14.500
very interesting, but the
colors are separated
54:14.500 --> 54:19.760
but in top of that, as an encore, because
it's not really an effect
54:19.760 --> 54:25.000
the red an black change packets
54:31.920 --> 54:38.420
I' love to continue with a classic, a
trick that came out years ago
54:38.420 --> 54:42.380
very revolutionary on the line
of Roy Walton's oil and queens
54:42.380 --> 54:45.280
and then it came the water
and water, do you now it?
54:45.280 --> 54:50.560
water and water in which at the end
54:50.560 --> 54:55.940
I shouldn't say that, it's better if I
show instead of explaining it
54:55.940 --> 55:02.180
I'm a genius, so let's use some cards
55:02.180 --> 55:07.820
specially relevant because of the color
55:07.820 --> 55:11.360
very colorful
55:11.360 --> 55:21.500
like these ones, a lot of color,
I thinks this is ok
55:21.500 --> 55:26.700
so this is very easy to
follow, pay attention
55:27.440 --> 55:32.260
4 cards here and 4 cards over here
55:33.140 --> 55:35.100
I can't lie
55:37.300 --> 55:40.880
so, here we have some red cards
55:40.880 --> 55:44.380
and here we have some black cards
55:44.380 --> 55:46.940
so in case you don't know
the oil and water mix
55:46.940 --> 55:48.660
they mix and they?
55:48.820 --> 55:50.460
they separate
55:50.640 --> 55:54.420
but people don't
believe this but it does
55:54.620 --> 56:00.300
have you ever had a dream within a dream?
56:00.300 --> 56:05.460
I have, I've dreamed about
dreaming and then I wake up
56:05.460 --> 56:10.460
only to realize I'm still asleep and I
was in a dream within a dream
56:10.460 --> 56:16.900
have you ever had that? it's very
strong because you wake up
56:16.900 --> 56:21.540
and then you realize you're
still asleep, it's a rush
56:21.660 --> 56:26.240
I ask that because what you're about to
see you won't understand now
56:26.240 --> 56:30.180
it's good that you remember that this is
not a dream within a dream
56:30.180 --> 56:32.920
but an illusion within an illusion
56:33.340 --> 56:35.500
now it's impossible to understand why
56:35.500 --> 56:37.740
because until you wake up
from the first dream
56:37.740 --> 56:38.960
you won't know you're inside another one
56:38.960 --> 56:40.860
so until you wake up from the first illusion
56:40.860 --> 56:45.320
you won't see the second.
so let yourself go
56:45.320 --> 56:50.880
I'm just letting you know that you are in
an illusion within an illusion
56:50.880 --> 56:58.240
so if that's clear, then let's
alternate both colors
56:58.820 --> 57:10.260
I'll show it very clearly so you can see
how they alternate all the way
57:11.780 --> 57:19.220
now e deal for here and four there
57:19.400 --> 57:23.300
and now all we have to do it wait
and you won't believe it
57:23.700 --> 57:29.780
red red red and red, and black
black black and black
57:34.020 --> 57:38.680
one by one all alternating,
it looks like it but no
57:38.680 --> 57:45.900
now, you've been watching very carefully
57:46.460 --> 57:54.880
let's do it a second time, now
you know that you're looking
57:56.600 --> 57:59.880
that changes the experience a little
58:01.080 --> 58:03.100
now you know that you're looking
58:03.100 --> 58:06.720
before you were only
looking, now you know
58:07.420 --> 58:09.080
yes?
58:11.720 --> 58:16.720
same as before
58:19.000 --> 58:24.360
some here and some there
58:25.400 --> 58:29.720
now this is just to let people know
that the slaughter is coming
58:29.720 --> 58:39.040
look, just like that, all the reds are
here and all the blacks are there
58:43.580 --> 58:52.160
I remind you that you are in an illusion
within an illusion. one more
58:53.540 --> 59:00.900
look at how they alternate all the way
59:03.720 --> 59:12.020
1, 2, 3 and 4 and here,
does this sound familiar?
59:12.920 --> 59:20.180
now these cards are all red
59:20.300 --> 59:27.060
you know what? I feel restless,
you know why?
59:27.060 --> 59:31.300
because what is the second
illusion? well in reality
59:31.300 --> 59:37.740
the cards could never separate by color
because there are no black cards
59:37.740 --> 59:40.940
so it looks like it
59:40.940 --> 59:47.980
when you wake up from the first illusion
the you fin out that in the end
59:47.980 --> 59:50.440
you find out that in the end
59:50.440 --> 59:54.020
even though all the cards are red
59:54.020 --> 59:57.260
for moment it looked like
there was something else
59:57.260 --> 01:00:01.360
and that's it
01:00:05.040 --> 01:00:08.100
I've tried this patter for a couple of times and it's hard
01:00:08.100 --> 01:00:10.880
hard to understand for some people
01:00:13.180 --> 01:00:17.900
the metaphor with the dream within
another dream helps a lot
01:00:17.900 --> 01:00:22.900
but when I'm working on waking
them up from the first illusion
01:00:23.520 --> 01:00:25.740
so in the third phase I
01:00:25.740 --> 01:00:31.840
show all the red cards and then
I would have to ask, and here?
01:00:31.840 --> 01:00:34.700
and when they say black you reply with
no, that's the first illusion
01:00:34.700 --> 01:00:37.340
the other illusion is that there
are no black cards
01:00:37.340 --> 01:00:38.780
so they couldn't separate by color
01:00:40.700 --> 01:00:44.380
then ending has the limitation that you
can't who them or give them away
01:00:44.380 --> 01:00:48.260
because there are three
black cards there
01:00:48.260 --> 01:00:51.860
but so far it's a beautiful trick.
01:00:51.860 --> 01:00:56.920
I've studied it through Ascanio's
oil and water routine
01:00:56.920 --> 01:01:03.040
because this trick was awful, at some
point the transferred a card here
01:01:03.040 --> 01:01:09.280
in the middle of the trick to make
the cards fit the sleight
01:01:09.280 --> 01:01:13.760
but it turns out that it's way
simpler than what I thought
01:01:13.760 --> 01:01:19.240
and after going through Ascanio's
routine it's very clean now
01:01:19.240 --> 01:01:24.100
and I used to do it all the time
01:01:24.100 --> 01:01:27.520
I didn't have the patter about
the illusion within the illusion
01:01:27.520 --> 01:01:31.380
I think that belongs to a more
private or intimate audience
01:01:31.380 --> 01:01:32.520
who can appreciate and understand it
01:01:33.920 --> 01:01:38.520
but it's still a difficult exercise
01:01:38.520 --> 01:01:44.420
to make it clean, because you have
two things battling for attention
01:01:44.420 --> 01:01:49.020
"understanding what's happening"
and "understanding the theme"
01:01:49.780 --> 01:01:53.180
and when you have that
battle they both lose.
01:01:53.180 --> 01:01:58.260
I remember "the dreamed dreamer"
with "el incauto bribon"
01:01:58.260 --> 01:01:59.460
who dream's who?
01:01:59.460 --> 01:02:02.100
is the joker dreaming of the cards
01:02:02.100 --> 01:02:03.900
or the cards are dreaming of the joker
01:02:03.900 --> 01:02:06.280
it's too confusing
01:02:06.280 --> 01:02:09.540
but if both dimensions
of the trick demand
01:02:09.540 --> 01:02:15.680
the same intensity something
will go wrong
01:02:15.680 --> 01:02:18.420
it's like reading and
listening to the radio
01:02:18.420 --> 01:02:21.340
something will go wrong if not both
01:02:21.980 --> 01:02:24.500
that's the balance you have
to achieve, and this has it.
01:02:24.500 --> 01:02:27.920
well, as an improvised construction
I find this very interesting
01:02:27.920 --> 01:02:32.680
little details. one is that I'll take out
3 black cards ad 6 red cards
01:02:32.680 --> 01:02:40.160
I want an 8 a 9 and a 10 of any black
suit, that way I don't have to count
01:02:40.160 --> 01:02:44.900
just by seeing a black 8, 9 and 10 I know I'm good
01:02:44.960 --> 01:02:48.540
now I'll remove all red 8 through 10
01:02:49.620 --> 01:02:52.700
so I say I'm taking out
some colorful cards
01:02:52.700 --> 01:02:57.060
so there's contrast.
I take out the first 10
01:02:57.060 --> 01:03:05.060
there's an 8 here but it doesn't
matter, the suits don't matter
01:03:05.060 --> 01:03:07.300
this one I don't need
01:03:07.300 --> 01:03:12.340
I take this 8 and now for talking
too much I screwed up
01:03:12.340 --> 01:03:17.920
when you shut up it works, the moment
you start talking you're screwed
01:03:17.920 --> 01:03:21.380
so there are 6 red cards
and 3 black cards
01:03:21.380 --> 01:03:24.540
but the way you think about it's
very important, like those
01:03:24.540 --> 01:03:33.340
3, 2, 2, 3 count where you can just talk and
talk an there are 20 cards
01:03:33.340 --> 01:03:38.340
because they work
differently, this is visual
01:03:38.340 --> 01:03:43.340
and you know if you go 3, 2,
2, 3 you know there are 10
01:03:43.340 --> 01:03:49.700
if you go 3, 2, 3, 2 then you lose
yourself, it's a brilliant concept
01:03:49.700 --> 01:03:54.220
that's how the brain works so this is a
very physiological technique
01:03:54.220 --> 01:03:57.980
because it defines how our brain works
01:03:57.980 --> 01:04:04.920
different ways of accessing information
or to store it or whatever
01:04:04.920 --> 01:04:09.320
so we have to work two
different ways so that
01:04:09.320 --> 01:04:11.100
they don't battle each other
01:04:11.100 --> 01:04:13.900
why can't you read and listen
to the radio at the same time?
01:04:13.900 --> 01:04:20.280
because they're using the same road so
they interfere with each other
01:04:20.280 --> 01:04:25.660
here's the same, so as long as
it's visual it doesn't matter
01:04:25.660 --> 01:04:27.460
you can say anything
01:04:27.460 --> 01:04:34.460
you don't have to have a rhythmic
patter which is also used
01:04:34.460 --> 01:04:38.220
so when you deal cards you
know when you're done
01:04:38.220 --> 01:04:40.540
"I'll deal cards and you tell me stop"
01:04:40.540 --> 01:04:47.000
I know I have 6 because that's the
time it takes to deal 6 cards
01:04:47.000 --> 01:04:50.740
"so what's you're name?
oh, beautiful name"
01:04:50.740 --> 01:04:54.940
"can you help me?" and now
I have 17 cards here
01:04:54.940 --> 01:05:02.980
I'm not going to count them
but you get the point
01:05:02.980 --> 01:05:05.540
so all of this technique is
very interesting
01:05:05.540 --> 01:05:11.220
because you have to take some
cards out and not others
01:05:11.360 --> 01:05:18.020
remember the trick with the gaff card
that's 3, 3, 3 and a different card
01:05:18.020 --> 01:05:21.660
if you have to take out three sets
of three, how do you do it?
01:05:21.660 --> 01:05:26.360
how do you know you only took out 3
Q's or 3 J's or 3 9's and not 4
01:05:26.360 --> 01:05:30.260
it's impossible because they
come out in random order
01:05:30.260 --> 01:05:33.040
so don't take out spades and that's it
01:05:33.640 --> 01:05:38.700
so forget the spades, I'll
take out Q's J's and K's
01:05:38.700 --> 01:05:44.380
I can't make a mistake because
I see spades I just ignore it
01:05:44.380 --> 01:05:49.380
and that's it, and I know
exactly what I have
01:05:51.420 --> 01:05:53.020
just by forgetting about the spades
01:05:53.020 --> 01:05:54.360
the brain doesn't have to
deal with anything else
01:05:54.360 --> 01:05:57.780
so you don't have to count
01:05:57.780 --> 01:06:04.420
because otherwise you can tell
the thinking, it takes longer
01:06:05.240 --> 01:06:10.660
so play around with that,
so this is shuffled
01:06:10.660 --> 01:06:14.660
now you have to find a 4, 2, 2, 1
sequence which is very easy
01:06:14.660 --> 01:06:19.660
so by almost showing the cards
01:06:19.660 --> 01:06:26.080
you can say "well I think these
are good" and there it is
01:06:26.140 --> 01:06:36.000
just by looking if you have the right cards
you already have the setup
01:06:36.000 --> 01:06:43.260
and from now on it's all done,
there's not much more to explain
01:06:43.260 --> 01:06:51.660
but the formal unit it's very interesting
and I think i very relevant
01:06:51.660 --> 01:06:55.940
this trick has serve me to apply
some of Ascanio's concepts
01:06:55.940 --> 01:07:06.300
and not all magic concepts
have that practical approach
01:07:06.300 --> 01:07:08.340
in Nelm's book there are two quotes
01:07:08.340 --> 01:07:11.820
that are very relevant in that matter
01:07:11.820 --> 01:07:13.880
in the intro the first chapter it says
01:07:13.880 --> 01:07:19.580
"drama and conjuring are
both arts of illusion"
01:07:19.580 --> 01:07:23.400
and the second in the first chapter says
01:07:23.400 --> 01:07:27.640
"the art of illusion is at least 95%
applied psychology"
01:07:27.640 --> 01:07:30.740
let's not concern ourselves
with stuff we can't prove
01:07:30.740 --> 01:07:36.000
if I can't prove it I don't care
01:07:36.100 --> 01:07:37.820
I'm interested in practicality
01:07:37.820 --> 01:07:43.280
and Ascanio y very practical and
can be applied directly
01:07:43.280 --> 01:07:51.140
always, if not then is just
philosophy, which is also fine
01:07:51.140 --> 01:07:55.940
in some cases like Luis Garcia
01:07:55.940 --> 01:07:58.320
he writes magic philosophy
which is also convenient
01:07:58.320 --> 01:08:03.760
when he says that any trick that
can be explained it's not magic
01:08:03.760 --> 01:08:07.220
that's hes argument against mentalism
01:08:07.220 --> 01:08:11.660
the more credible is mind reading
the less magical it becomes
01:08:11.660 --> 01:08:12.440
because it has an explanation
01:08:12.440 --> 01:08:16.340
it's an interesting theory and it's
good to discuss these things
01:08:16.340 --> 01:08:19.140
but you must differentiate between
philosophy and practical theory
01:08:19.140 --> 01:08:22.860
and Ascanio was an advocate
of a science of magic
01:08:22.860 --> 01:08:27.380
where we could base ourselves
01:08:27.380 --> 01:08:29.940
why? because when we stop being laymen
01:08:29.940 --> 01:08:35.900
we lose our sight and then transfer
our own conception of magic
01:08:35.900 --> 01:08:39.860
to the spectator who's watching
for the first time
01:08:39.920 --> 01:08:41.980
something you've seen for years
01:08:42.200 --> 01:08:47.180
you're deforming it and then
giving it to the spectator
01:08:47.180 --> 01:08:52.460
assuming things that the spectator
it's not even thinking
01:08:52.460 --> 01:08:57.460
so we have to go to the laymen point of
view but we can't do it honestly
01:08:57.460 --> 01:09:02.460
we have to do it based in
knowledge we can trust
01:09:02.460 --> 01:09:06.260
that's the key an Ascanio
is great for that
01:09:06.260 --> 01:09:09.780
so the susceptibility game
plays out here too
01:09:09.780 --> 01:09:12.940
so you can do it slowly,
clearly an cleanly
01:09:12.940 --> 01:09:16.700
a dream within a dream
as a possible patter
01:09:16.700 --> 01:09:22.680
so when we find this position and then
we can go for the formal unit
01:09:22.680 --> 01:09:28.180
which is a concept I use since some time
ago and I find it fascinating
01:09:28.180 --> 01:09:36.220
because it respects the view of
the spectator in a great way
01:09:36.220 --> 01:09:40.560
so the first time the
spectator sees the trick
01:09:40.560 --> 01:09:46.360
he sees the card come
to the top, second time
01:09:46.360 --> 01:09:49.820
it's identical, in some
ambitious card routines
01:09:49.820 --> 01:09:55.860
the card comes out of here, there,
my forehead, it changes, it flies
01:09:55.860 --> 01:09:58.300
so the spectator get stressed out
01:09:58.300 --> 01:09:59.500
because every time he
has to start all over
01:09:59.500 --> 01:10:00.860
and can't hold on to the previous one
01:10:00.860 --> 01:10:05.760
that's not enriching, did you fool them?
yes, is it artistic? no
01:10:05.760 --> 01:10:08.100
that's on the level of fooling
01:10:08.100 --> 01:10:14.520
and it's difficult because
the magician always wins
01:10:15.080 --> 01:10:20.680
the magician is cheating
01:10:20.900 --> 01:10:23.900
so don't pat yourself on the back
because fooling is very easy
01:10:23.900 --> 01:10:26.900
and it's easier than what
we're trying to do here
01:10:26.900 --> 01:10:29.220
so it's like "hello good
night, I'm the magician
01:10:29.220 --> 01:10:32.880
and I'm here to fool you all night long"
01:10:32.880 --> 01:10:41.420
ready? let's go....
01:10:41.420 --> 01:10:45.180
good by, you get your money and you're
done and you forget of Ascanio
01:10:45.180 --> 01:10:46.420
and concepts and everything
01:10:46.420 --> 01:10:54.700
do it like that and make some money and
don't care about these things
01:10:54.700 --> 01:10:58.140
but if you want or need something else
01:10:58.140 --> 01:11:01.320
then you need to get
past the level of fooling
01:11:01.320 --> 01:11:07.580
and it has to be done with
that concept from Ascanio
01:11:07.580 --> 01:11:12.000
which I believe it's the most solid
01:11:12.000 --> 01:11:15.420
you can trust it and tested too
01:11:15.420 --> 01:11:19.900
because he did what he wrote
and wrote what he did
01:11:19.900 --> 01:11:22.980
and the great thinkers where like that
01:11:22.980 --> 01:11:26.640
their lives framed their
thinking and vice versa
01:11:26.640 --> 01:11:31.640
it's not like "do as I
say but not as I do"
01:11:31.640 --> 01:11:35.580
the ethical basis one self is saying
01:11:35.580 --> 01:11:45.100
"my life and my actions
part from my ideas"
01:11:45.100 --> 01:11:49.620
and I don't know any other thinker
of the same category
01:11:49.620 --> 01:11:51.400
who does that with such honesty
01:11:51.400 --> 01:11:59.060
so it's a good guarantee if we want this
to be art once and for all
01:11:59.420 --> 01:12:03.500
so at this point comes the formal unit
01:12:03.500 --> 01:12:05.420
first they see. then they
know they are seeing
01:12:05.420 --> 01:12:07.400
because they pull from the
previous experience
01:12:07.580 --> 01:12:14.000
now they see the process, they
recognize it, they see it coming
01:12:14.000 --> 01:12:16.180
here it comes here it comes, and there it is
01:12:16.180 --> 01:12:23.500
so they see it coming
and that's very strong
01:12:23.500 --> 01:12:29.780
and the third is to vary the unit which
is the perfect balance when
01:12:29.780 --> 01:12:36.040
the third time is another chance, can't
you see them separating?
01:12:36.040 --> 01:12:38.420
you haven't even seen how
the blacks disappeared
01:12:41.040 --> 01:12:46.040
so the third time it's like Hitchcock
Aces from Darwin Ortiz
01:12:46.040 --> 01:12:52.340
you know the last Ace is going
to travel, the third Ace
01:12:52.340 --> 01:12:56.520
so everybody's looking at the ace
01:12:56.520 --> 01:12:59.700
and not only you don't
this ace traveling here
01:12:59.700 --> 01:13:01.520
but you don't see the
three aces going there
01:13:01.520 --> 01:13:06.520
you miss one and then
you miss three at once
01:13:06.520 --> 01:13:13.520
it's great. something
similar happens here
01:13:13.520 --> 01:13:19.640
"they separate again but the funny thing
is that there are no black cards"
01:13:19.640 --> 01:13:21.580
now I don't understand anything
01:13:21.580 --> 01:13:25.860
it's fascinating because it exceeds
the expected ending
01:13:25.860 --> 01:13:30.260
we have to try not to disappoint
01:13:30.260 --> 01:13:33.600
between your expectations
and what really happens
01:13:33.600 --> 01:13:38.600
the basic sequence when you're
separating the cards
01:13:38.600 --> 01:13:44.820
thanks to this sequence you can
deal 4 red cards and here we do
01:13:44.820 --> 01:13:53.260
a double push off of the third
card and now we have to
01:13:53.260 --> 01:13:59.220
play with the balance
to cover the handling
01:13:59.220 --> 01:14:03.100
where this cards move in this direction
and these move in this direction
01:14:03.100 --> 01:14:08.100
reds here with an unsquared elmsley
01:14:08.100 --> 01:14:13.100
and these go that way
01:14:14.600 --> 01:14:18.340
so a group in this direction
and the other group
01:14:18.340 --> 01:14:21.480
in the opposite direction
and that helps to cover
01:14:21.480 --> 01:14:27.900
so it's not that bold, then you talk a bit
and take the heat of the cards
01:14:27.900 --> 01:14:31.340
so when the go back to them they
know what they're seeing
01:14:31.340 --> 01:14:35.960
some reds and some blacks
01:14:36.580 --> 01:14:39.100
by the way has someone
dreamed about dreaming?
01:14:39.100 --> 01:14:43.820
so then you move the focus off the table
01:14:43.820 --> 01:14:54.340
so then you explain the illusion
within the illusion
01:14:54.340 --> 01:14:59.120
when you come back down this is black
01:14:59.960 --> 01:15:06.080
there's no question about it, no doubt, it
doesn't require confirmation
01:15:06.080 --> 01:15:11.300
the packets are cold, so now you can work
01:15:11.300 --> 01:15:15.380
and now you use a kind of misdirection
01:15:15.380 --> 01:15:18.200
where you talk about what you do
and not about what happens
01:15:18.200 --> 01:15:23.540
so, always alternating,
here I do a pinky count
01:15:23.540 --> 01:15:29.660
infinitely better than the buckle
which is horrendous
01:15:29.660 --> 01:15:35.280
I thank mister Buckley for all he
did but he can rest in peace
01:15:35.280 --> 01:15:42.740
there's better things to do than bending
cards and create tension
01:15:42.740 --> 01:15:46.340
so I think the pinky count is far
superior than the buckle
01:15:47.520 --> 01:15:53.520
for the pull down to work you need to
bevel the cards towards the thumb
01:15:53.520 --> 01:15:57.500
hold it with these fingers
and then pull down
01:15:57.500 --> 01:16:00.320
the bevel makes each card longer
than the previous one
01:16:00.320 --> 01:16:02.500
so inevitably you'll pull the bottom card
01:16:02.500 --> 01:16:05.980
you don't have to look
for it, just pull it
01:16:05.980 --> 01:16:12.220
so it can't fail, if you can't see it grab
more cards and try again
01:16:12.220 --> 01:16:18.560
hold the deck in dealing
grip, bevel the cards
01:16:18.560 --> 01:16:25.880
now you can see how all the cards are
beveled towards the thumb
01:16:25.880 --> 01:16:30.880
index an thumb hold the deck, a
classic grip in card magic
01:16:30.880 --> 01:16:35.480
so when you pull down with your
pinky you'll get the card
01:16:40.320 --> 01:16:45.380
so when you practice with the deck
your conscious of the bevel
01:16:45.380 --> 01:16:52.380
if you pull and don't get a card then
your not beveling the cards right
01:16:52.380 --> 01:16:55.540
there's no margin for error
01:16:55.540 --> 01:16:58.880
if you don't get the card
you're not doing it right
01:16:58.880 --> 01:17:03.260
so with less cards the bevel
is more difficult to see
01:17:03.340 --> 01:17:05.020
but it doesn't matter, if I do this
01:17:05.160 --> 01:17:07.540
they're beveled no matter
if I see it or not
01:17:07.580 --> 01:17:09.620
if I don't see it it doesn't
mean is not there
01:17:09.620 --> 01:17:15.060
so I can do it in real time
01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:22.040
I spread the cards, I fan the cards
and hold it with three fingers
01:17:22.040 --> 01:17:26.700
the third one is a double, and now I push
the cards in from below
01:17:26.700 --> 01:17:30.340
and make sure you can see this step
because the spectator needs it
01:17:30.340 --> 01:17:36.500
they have to see the step
01:17:36.500 --> 01:17:39.820
push them in from below not from the top
01:17:39.820 --> 01:17:41.500
because then you are covering the cards
01:17:41.500 --> 01:17:47.600
a detail from Ascanio, square at the
fingertips and riffle the sides
01:17:47.600 --> 01:17:52.980
like you were saying red black red black
01:17:52.980 --> 01:17:58.920
now you deal 4 and here the
last one is the double
01:17:58.920 --> 01:18:04.820
there's something that you'll see when
you study this trick which is
01:18:04.820 --> 01:18:09.820
at the beginning during the exposition
01:18:09.820 --> 01:18:17.120
there's a double deal, then
in the first two phases
01:18:17.120 --> 01:18:25.380
there's a double push off
and double at the bottom
01:18:26.320 --> 01:18:33.120
I'm wrong, the thing is that the
techniques change sides
01:18:33.120 --> 01:18:40.460
so now they're separated
we do the magic move
01:18:40.460 --> 01:18:43.660
help the spectator,
01:18:43.660 --> 01:18:45.260
if you do the gesture don't mention it
01:18:45.260 --> 01:18:46.720
and if you say it don't do it
01:18:46.720 --> 01:18:49.260
what is seen is not said, what is said is not seen if not
01:18:49.260 --> 01:18:51.720
we have to say it over and over
01:18:51.720 --> 01:18:55.780
so if we wait a little, even
if you don't believe it
01:18:55.780 --> 01:19:04.440
unquared elsmley but we want it
to look similar, and here
01:19:05.720 --> 01:19:11.520
and then you can do this
from Joaquin Mata
01:19:11.520 --> 01:19:16.740
and I loved it because it's brilliant
01:19:16.740 --> 01:19:25.940
it's beautiful. pause, they don't
know what's coming
01:19:26.080 --> 01:19:31.040
don't act like it's a fact,
this must be a climax
01:19:31.040 --> 01:19:35.740
it should, I don't want to sound grumpy
01:19:35.740 --> 01:19:39.740
but if I do this and these are
supposed to be black
01:19:39.740 --> 01:19:44.480
and it's clear that these are
red take a look at this
01:19:45.980 --> 01:19:49.860
these red cards are alternating
for sure, with what?
01:19:49.860 --> 01:19:55.500
the spectator might not be sure
but these are alternating
01:19:55.500 --> 01:20:02.760
so they should be alternating,
so explain this.
01:20:03.820 --> 01:20:09.100
it has to be a climax, so
you have to let it be
01:20:09.100 --> 01:20:13.660
you are thinking about
the killer ending so
01:20:13.660 --> 01:20:17.060
so you miss selling this part, so
focus on what you're doing
01:20:17.060 --> 01:20:22.720
magic is an art of the present, of now,
you have to seize the moment
01:20:22.720 --> 01:20:28.300
let them flip out and now look
at the joy when you say
01:20:29.380 --> 01:20:31.940
-you want to see it again?
-of course!
01:20:31.940 --> 01:20:38.100
so pause, mark it and sell the climax
01:20:38.100 --> 01:20:41.860
and the best hing of all is
that it can be repeated
01:20:41.860 --> 01:20:44.480
and now they have to get into it
01:20:44.480 --> 01:20:52.560
if they relax and applaud they
get away from the trick
01:20:52.560 --> 01:20:57.880
they have to pull from the
recent experience
01:20:57.880 --> 01:21:05.480
that's why it's important the
everything looks familiar
01:21:05.480 --> 01:21:12.980
and they can see the ending coming
01:21:12.980 --> 01:21:19.600
it's amazing so in what moment are
going from ordinary to magic?
01:21:19.600 --> 01:21:25.080
from a normal experience to magic,
once again. always the same
01:21:25.080 --> 01:21:30.740
everything repeats, the steps
01:21:30.740 --> 01:21:38.200
the stops, the looks, if in the previous
phase you marked this position
01:21:38.200 --> 01:21:45.540
do it now again, whatever it is you do
01:21:45.540 --> 01:21:50.540
mark it and do it with the same intensity
01:21:50.540 --> 01:21:56.840
keep asking, does it look familiar?
01:21:56.840 --> 01:22:05.860
so when you arrive at the end
and they are expecting it
01:22:06.540 --> 01:22:15.260
some thing have that dramatic edge
like when you flip this over
01:22:16.720 --> 01:22:20.260
and you say "yes, they're all red"
01:22:20.260 --> 01:22:22.900
but were does it come that pause from?
it doesn't come from the trick
01:22:22.900 --> 01:22:29.460
only because you know what
the spectator is thinking
01:22:29.460 --> 01:22:31.560
if you don't know that
then you can't do this
01:22:31.560 --> 01:22:36.560
but if you know then this things happen
01:22:36.560 --> 01:22:42.020
those little moments when you're
milking the dramatic moment
01:22:42.020 --> 01:22:47.620
so instead of 1, 2, 3 I go 1, 2, 3...
and 4, just to play around
01:22:51.720 --> 01:22:57.600
so yes, all of the cards are red
01:22:57.600 --> 01:23:01.540
this is the strong part and then
01:23:01.540 --> 01:23:03.140
you're done but that's not so
important, this is what matter
01:23:03.780 --> 01:23:09.480
now all of that goes into the illusion
01:23:09.480 --> 01:23:16.480
and we go to the last
phase, with the Elmsley
01:23:16.480 --> 01:23:22.760
in dealing grip just put the
last one on the bottom
01:23:22.760 --> 01:23:30.020
nobody will see it because the formal
unit is strong enough to absorb it
01:23:30.020 --> 01:23:35.020
so with that we break the loop
and we go into another
01:23:35.020 --> 01:23:42.480
so in this new loop the
double is the last card
01:23:43.160 --> 01:23:50.720
the reds are still red, place them from
the bottom up, show the step
01:23:51.340 --> 01:23:55.180
so here we have an Elmsley
for one of the blacks
01:23:55.180 --> 01:23:56.940
and here for the other to cards
01:23:56.940 --> 01:24:03.340
I find it remarkable, and the same
01:24:03.340 --> 01:24:06.500
now everything looks the same
01:24:06.500 --> 01:24:09.780
but this time we do the same
push off as the first time
01:24:09.780 --> 01:24:14.060
so both techniques change places
01:24:14.060 --> 01:24:18.000
the first and the last stay
the same and then
01:24:18.000 --> 01:24:26.480
pause, and now you do this
01:24:27.520 --> 01:24:29.100
these are already red to them
01:24:29.100 --> 01:24:34.020
if you move a card before
the effect is very bad
01:24:34.020 --> 01:24:37.280
that's the worst conception of all
01:24:37.280 --> 01:24:39.780
show them first and then
do whatever you want
01:24:39.780 --> 01:24:41.980
but to move them first it's bad
01:24:41.980 --> 01:24:47.180
here we can do it because they've seen
it twice so it's enough to do this
01:24:47.180 --> 01:24:50.580
now you can do anything
because they won't see
01:24:50.580 --> 01:24:56.960
so now here are all the red cards
01:24:56.960 --> 01:25:07.500
you can show them like this,
more elegant like Ascanio did
01:25:07.500 --> 01:25:12.880
all red cards, pause and here
are all of the blacks
01:25:12.920 --> 01:25:15.040
the illusion within the illusion
01:25:15.120 --> 01:25:18.520
is that really there were
never any black cards
01:25:18.860 --> 01:25:23.980
now you come here and while
they applause is still going
01:25:23.980 --> 01:25:26.940
you go to this position to do
an extended Elmsley count
01:25:26.940 --> 01:25:30.040
so I'm going to peel 4 and then 2
to get all the blacks together
01:25:30.040 --> 01:25:37.280
watch, I peel 4, then they go back
on top, and now I peel 2 more
01:25:37.280 --> 01:25:39.900
and now I do an extended Elmsley count
01:25:39.900 --> 01:25:42.540
because I can't do the Hamman count
01:25:42.540 --> 01:25:45.540
it's very good but I can't do it
01:25:45.540 --> 01:25:53.140
there's people who do miracles with it but I can't do it
01:25:53.140 --> 01:26:00.380
so I do this Elmsley count but with
more cards so I peel 1, 2, 3
01:26:00.380 --> 01:26:04.820
and I like it because you
can see everything
01:26:04.820 --> 01:26:11.420
let''s do it right, the
switch is very soft
01:26:11.420 --> 01:26:17.480
it can be done slowly, it's very
clear, there are no jumps or
01:26:17.480 --> 01:26:21.860
quick movements or
anything, and from here
01:26:21.860 --> 01:26:24.420
these cards need to go somewhere
01:26:24.420 --> 01:26:29.000
you can't do this, you, throw them
nonchalantly in the table
01:26:29.000 --> 01:26:32.780
shuffle while they applaud, you work after
you're done and then you say
01:26:32.780 --> 01:26:34.900
"that's the good thing
about the red cards
01:26:34.900 --> 01:26:37.420
you can get an illusion
within another illusion"
01:26:37.580 --> 01:26:41.500
and that's it
01:26:45.740 --> 01:26:54.200
well, here you can see all of my notes
01:26:55.180 --> 01:27:01.580
I would like to finish with a
trick that I love very much
01:27:01.580 --> 01:27:07.840
I used to do this
01:27:11.580 --> 01:27:17.940
wait this is the wrong deck
01:27:17.940 --> 01:27:23.380
not this one either,
we'll find it don't worry
01:27:25.140 --> 01:27:29.360
not this one, well it doesn't matter
01:27:29.360 --> 01:27:34.980
I don't know what I did
01:27:35.960 --> 01:27:43.920
this goes here, and this here, this trick
I used to use as an opener
01:27:43.920 --> 01:27:49.180
it has some contradictions because
01:27:49.180 --> 01:27:52.020
I think is good to start a magic session
01:27:52.020 --> 01:27:59.840
it's surprising, it leaves a good
impression of the magician
01:27:59.840 --> 01:28:02.660
it fails apparently, the thing with
apparent mistakes is that
01:28:02.660 --> 01:28:05.900
you should not fail for real
during your session
01:28:05.900 --> 01:28:11.940
because then you've made many mistakes
01:28:11.940 --> 01:28:14.620
tow for real, three were false
but the conclusion is
01:28:14.620 --> 01:28:17.920
that you need to practice more
01:28:17.920 --> 01:28:23.320
so be careful with apparent
mistakes, they're ok
01:28:23.320 --> 01:28:26.060
except you can make a real mistake
look like an apparent one
01:28:26.060 --> 01:28:27.980
if you can sell it
01:28:27.980 --> 01:28:33.820
it depends on how you play it, you have
to be careful with those things
01:28:33.820 --> 01:28:38.820
but it's aver interesting opener
01:28:38.820 --> 01:28:44.980
so, can you take any card?
it doesn't matter what it is
01:28:44.980 --> 01:28:49.220
you can look at it and remember it
01:28:49.220 --> 01:28:52.500
because it won't be me
who will find the card
01:28:52.500 --> 01:28:56.180
it won't be me, actually.
01:28:56.180 --> 01:29:02.280
I'm going to throw myself into the
most absolute randomness
01:29:02.280 --> 01:29:07.180
so the deck will dictate whatever
happens from now on
01:29:07.180 --> 01:29:10.760
but I trust it. for example
01:29:13.800 --> 01:29:19.560
the first card from I turn over will tell
me the color of your card
01:29:19.560 --> 01:29:24.220
so keep your poker face,
don't help me at all
01:29:24.220 --> 01:29:30.080
because I want the deck to
take me to good fortune
01:29:30.080 --> 01:29:32.780
so the first card will tell
me the color of yours
01:29:34.560 --> 01:29:39.060
black! so we know your card is black
01:29:41.700 --> 01:29:46.980
I know I'm doing it right, so if it's black
it must be spades or clubs
01:29:46.980 --> 01:29:51.780
the next card will tell me
the suit of your card
01:29:51.780 --> 01:29:56.900
I know it's black so it must
be spades or clubs
01:29:56.900 --> 01:29:58.800
spades
01:30:04.640 --> 01:30:15.180
spades, maybe the most important
is the position of the card
01:30:17.840 --> 01:30:23.120
the fourth position, this means that
no matter if I cut or shuffle
01:30:23.120 --> 01:30:27.020
when I count 4 cards the
fourth will be yours
01:30:27.020 --> 01:30:29.120
just because, it never fails
01:30:29.120 --> 01:30:35.500
ready? 1, 2, 3, 4
01:30:36.960 --> 01:30:39.620
be honest, between you and me
01:30:39.620 --> 01:30:43.440
do you it's possible that this
is your card? yes or no?
01:30:43.440 --> 01:30:45.100
- yes
-yes?
01:30:45.100 --> 01:30:48.820
really you trust me that much?
01:30:48.820 --> 01:30:53.060
because some people don't trust me but
01:30:53.060 --> 01:30:56.340
but it doesn't matter because if magic
is the art of the impossible
01:30:56.460 --> 01:31:00.180
and it's impossible for some people
that this is the selected card
01:31:00.180 --> 01:31:02.480
then just because of that this
is the 4 of clubs your card
01:31:02.480 --> 01:31:07.660
thanks you for trusting me
01:31:07.660 --> 01:31:13.980
but usually they don't trust me,
you thought it was possible
01:31:14.600 --> 01:31:19.220
did you all thought it was possible?
01:31:19.220 --> 01:31:23.480
-you didn't? why?
-because it appeared earlier
01:31:24.480 --> 01:31:28.480
here? did you see it here?
01:31:30.640 --> 01:31:36.660
well, you know. I always put one ace here
01:31:36.660 --> 01:31:41.500
but so it's not alone I always leave
a second and a third ace too
01:31:41.500 --> 01:31:44.140
in fact, if you blow on top of you card
because that never happens
01:31:44.140 --> 01:31:46.500
now we have the fourth
01:31:46.500 --> 01:31:55.140
and that's it, very good, very good
01:31:55.140 --> 01:32:00.140
is a contradictory trick because when you
say "do you think is possible?"
01:32:00.140 --> 01:32:09.040
but every time I do it and I would
have to tattoo this on my skin
01:32:09.040 --> 01:32:13.160
every time a woman takes the
card, and this is a fact
01:32:13.160 --> 01:32:14.660
and you ask them if it is possible
01:32:14.660 --> 01:32:18.160
they are so positive and optimistic
that they ruin the ending
01:32:18.160 --> 01:32:24.900
because all of them say yes, truly is
rare when a woman says no to me
01:32:24.900 --> 01:32:35.020
did you see what I did there?
well, let's leave it at that
01:32:35.160 --> 01:32:39.880
so it's very interesting because
women tend to say yes
01:32:39.880 --> 01:32:43.180
I don't know what psychological
mechanism is working there
01:32:43.180 --> 01:32:45.640
but they tend to say yes
01:32:45.640 --> 01:32:51.060
instead the guys usually say no
01:32:51.060 --> 01:32:53.980
so if you think it's impossible
that this is the selected card
01:32:54.060 --> 01:32:56.060
then just of that here it is
01:32:56.060 --> 01:33:00.440
and it frames the reason for the
card to change very well
01:33:00.440 --> 01:33:05.780
I like it a lot because swithching
the cards for the aces
01:33:05.780 --> 01:33:09.080
I thought about it when
I learned this switch
01:33:09.180 --> 01:33:11.940
I don't know who originated
it, do you all know it?
01:33:11.940 --> 01:33:21.060
there are also techniques that are very
popular and then they disappear
01:33:21.160 --> 01:33:26.420
for lack of use or whatever,
so you hold a break
01:33:26.420 --> 01:33:32.460
and then just drop it, everybody
knows it? do you use it?
01:33:33.560 --> 01:33:39.440
there are great things you can do
with this, like an ambitious card
01:33:39.440 --> 01:33:44.440
and placing the card on top
01:33:44.440 --> 01:33:50.940
don't let it drop, just place the packet on top and that's it
01:33:50.940 --> 01:33:55.820
put it on top of the other packet
and that it looks great
01:33:55.820 --> 01:33:59.520
even as control, take a card
01:34:00.140 --> 01:34:06.240
and without even thinking about
it, put it back and that's it
01:34:07.420 --> 01:34:13.420
it's perfect, without any dressing
because in the end
01:34:13.420 --> 01:34:17.900
the only point of this is to cover the
switch, but it's not necessary
01:34:20.180 --> 01:34:25.300
no extras, and it looks great
01:34:25.300 --> 01:34:27.900
so what I do is a leave the
ace of spades on top
01:34:27.900 --> 01:34:32.640
it doesn't really matter which
ace it is, what matters is that
01:34:32.640 --> 01:34:37.600
over the second ace there's a four,
which will set up the ending
01:34:37.600 --> 01:34:43.140
this card here will never be seen
01:34:43.140 --> 01:34:51.120
and this one will be seen so it's x card,
ace, 4, ace, x card and ace
01:34:51.120 --> 01:34:56.120
these two will be seen, now if
you want to make sure
01:34:57.340 --> 01:34:59.820
I was about to say some nonsense
01:34:59.820 --> 01:35:08.160
because this trick has two ways of
unfolding that can't be controlled
01:35:08.160 --> 01:35:13.260
you can if you force a card that
doesn't match the information
01:35:13.260 --> 01:35:17.680
but if you don't want to do that
01:35:17.680 --> 01:35:24.080
you can play it towards an absolute no
01:35:24.080 --> 01:35:33.220
well, the color will always match but
everything else doesn't make sense
01:35:33.320 --> 01:35:39.640
however when they see
the card is the same
01:35:41.740 --> 01:35:44.640
because they are not expecting it
01:35:45.820 --> 01:35:49.700
it's great the absolute bewilderment
01:35:49.700 --> 01:35:52.300
because they don't know it's there
01:35:52.300 --> 01:35:56.520
this explains that Vernon quote
that's usually not well explained
01:35:56.520 --> 01:36:00.100
where he says "confusion is
not magic" that's gold
01:36:00.100 --> 01:36:07.360
the only thing that's missing is that it
only applies to the effect
01:36:07.880 --> 01:36:10.340
confusion is not magic in the effect
01:36:10.340 --> 01:36:13.540
however confusion related to the drama
01:36:13.540 --> 01:36:19.000
it's a dramatic resource of first order,
and that's what's happening here
01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:25.720
the spectator is confused
about the circumstances
01:36:25.720 --> 01:36:27.860
but the effect is clear, the card is here
01:36:27.920 --> 01:36:29.700
and that doesn't happen very often
01:36:29.700 --> 01:36:35.240
the identity of a face down card that
remains in time during the trick
01:36:35.240 --> 01:36:40.140
that very rare, because this
tends to weaken over time
01:36:40.140 --> 01:36:43.280
remember the slow motion aces
01:36:43.280 --> 01:36:48.280
every ace is weaker than the previous
01:36:48.280 --> 01:36:51.740
you can tell by looking at the spectator
01:36:51.740 --> 01:36:54.540
they take it maybe for being polite
01:36:54.540 --> 01:36:58.140
"but if you show them before you'd
be doing me a favor because"
01:36:58.140 --> 01:37:04.640
"it looks like it, it looks like it but"
01:37:04.640 --> 01:37:09.640
"I'm filled with doubt, because the card
is face down" so this is great
01:37:09.640 --> 01:37:14.640
and that means that some sensitive
elements like the identity
01:37:14.640 --> 01:37:18.100
the feeling of travel. If you
do Vernon's travelers
01:37:18.100 --> 01:37:21.580
you have the card signed so
there's absolute certainty
01:37:21.580 --> 01:37:27.680
that the signed ace that's on the deck
is the same I pull out of my pocket
01:37:27.680 --> 01:37:30.300
what does the signature say?
that it's the same ace
01:37:30.300 --> 01:37:32.300
does it say anything about the travel? no
01:37:33.040 --> 01:37:34.700
nothing about the travel
01:37:34.700 --> 01:37:37.060
I know that this ace that was in the deck
01:37:37.060 --> 01:37:39.380
is now in your pocket and it is singed
01:37:39.380 --> 01:37:42.860
or in the wallet, it's amazing but I have
no idea of how it happened
01:37:42.860 --> 01:37:45.300
so what phenomenon are we talking about? none
01:37:45.300 --> 01:37:52.200
is it traveling? does it disappear,
what are we saying here?
01:37:52.200 --> 01:37:54.780
if you take into account the feeling
01:37:54.780 --> 01:37:56.740
the signatures would not be relevant
01:37:57.180 --> 01:38:01.220
to do the Vernon travelers
without signing the aces
01:38:01.740 --> 01:38:05.800
it should work if the trick meets
all of the requirements
01:38:05.800 --> 01:38:08.700
if you don't do it without the
signatures it's because
01:38:08.700 --> 01:38:13.560
there's no ability to
conceive it properly
01:38:13.560 --> 01:38:17.140
instead here we have a perfect example
01:38:17.140 --> 01:38:20.560
where the identity of the
card remains in time
01:38:20.560 --> 01:38:23.140
the coin in the deck, it must
be the same coin
01:38:23.140 --> 01:38:25.900
but it should be the same
even of you're using two
01:38:25.900 --> 01:38:29.780
the feeling must come before
the reality, just like before
01:38:29.780 --> 01:38:31.720
"what happens" is not as important
as "what it looks like"
01:38:31.720 --> 01:38:34.860
what should it look like?
that it's the same coin
01:38:34.860 --> 01:38:36.480
even if it's not the same coin
it must look like it
01:38:36.480 --> 01:38:44.620
if not then we have to go to Juan's
version using Slydini's techniques
01:38:44.620 --> 01:38:49.220
through the table, then
Juan's signature appears
01:38:49.220 --> 01:38:51.500
and on the other side the spectator's
signature and it' very strong
01:38:51.500 --> 01:38:54.840
because they understand
that it's another coin
01:38:54.840 --> 01:38:57.820
so I don't think it's a good job
01:38:57.820 --> 01:39:01.600
I'm sorry but I don't think
it's a good formula
01:39:01.600 --> 01:39:07.840
revealing the trick by saying it's another
coin just to show it's the same
01:39:07.840 --> 01:39:12.840
the effect is very strong which is
what happens with false clues
01:39:12.840 --> 01:39:17.780
where you end up completely dumbfounded
because there are no more options
01:39:17.780 --> 01:39:26.620
that was the last resort and when
it's gone your left nowhere
01:39:26.800 --> 01:39:30.820
internally is very powerful
01:39:30.820 --> 01:39:35.820
just through the possibilities of the
trick, if you see a feather
01:39:35.820 --> 01:39:40.820
you know a dove is coming out, so when
it appears there's nothing else
01:39:40.820 --> 01:39:44.980
that's the example he
uses to explain this
01:39:44.980 --> 01:39:49.380
here however it's the context
of the trick itself
01:39:49.380 --> 01:39:50.740
what makes it hold over time
01:39:50.740 --> 01:39:57.060
so we have to look for other mechanisms
either dramatic or psychological
01:39:57.060 --> 01:40:02.060
that help to create feelings
over reality and facts
01:40:02.060 --> 01:40:04.860
and that's very difficult
01:40:04.860 --> 01:40:11.220
I'm sorry to say this but to come up with
another version of the triumph
01:40:11.220 --> 01:40:18.080
can be done with one
hand tied to the back
01:40:18.360 --> 01:40:20.660
to make this card's name remain in time
01:40:20.660 --> 01:40:24.060
requires a lot of work and
profound thinking
01:40:24.060 --> 01:40:29.700
to come up with tricks
based on techniques
01:40:29.700 --> 01:40:38.220
just creates more material
and less quality
01:40:38.320 --> 01:40:43.460
me and anybody here could
publish a book a month
01:40:43.460 --> 01:40:48.460
with worthless material that has
no sense for the future
01:40:48.460 --> 01:40:53.460
so I think it's better to focus and
solve deeper stuff like this
01:40:53.460 --> 01:40:57.660
this card remains in time,
the reasons must be analyzed
01:40:57.660 --> 01:41:00.720
and the rule must be extracted
from the trick
01:41:00.720 --> 01:41:05.720
because the rule can be used as a tool
01:41:05.720 --> 01:41:08.540
that can be applied to many things
01:41:08.540 --> 01:41:10.720
if you only stay with the trick
the you're collecting events
01:41:10.720 --> 01:41:15.720
but you're not learning so we have
to look for the hidden rules
01:41:15.720 --> 01:41:18.660
that's what Ascanio did, he
looked for the general rule
01:41:18.660 --> 01:41:22.180
and with it all the applications for it
01:41:22.180 --> 01:41:25.380
so after the first hit
01:41:25.380 --> 01:41:30.580
I'm sorry for digressing but
otherwise I don't enjoy it
01:41:30.720 --> 01:41:38.460
the card is controlled to the
top, not much to say there
01:41:38.460 --> 01:41:41.840
I like the quote about randomness a lot
01:41:41.840 --> 01:41:48.220
don't tell me anything, keep a poker face
01:41:48.220 --> 01:41:50.860
and that's it everything is the same
01:41:50.860 --> 01:41:53.740
the attitude is that this
is an experiment
01:41:53.740 --> 01:41:55.700
in the Nelms book it's
very well explained
01:41:55.700 --> 01:41:58.520
a demonstration always work,
an experiment can go wrong
01:41:58.520 --> 01:42:01.620
what are you doing? a demonstration
or an experiment?
01:42:01.680 --> 01:42:03.980
I have an experiment I'm throwing
myself into randomness
01:42:04.420 --> 01:42:06.460
and I hope lady luck is on my side
01:42:06.460 --> 01:42:13.520
an in that case we will
have a great night
01:42:13.520 --> 01:42:15.080
let's start
01:42:15.220 --> 01:42:21.020
but something can go wrong
01:42:21.020 --> 01:42:27.800
so because it is an experiment
so I apply that quality to it
01:42:27.800 --> 01:42:31.880
so let's begin
01:42:31.880 --> 01:42:33.980
I shuffle and cut and whatever
card ends up on top
01:42:33.980 --> 01:42:36.880
will tell me the color of your card
01:42:36.880 --> 01:42:45.940
everybody must see the card, pay attention
because w only have one chance
01:42:45.940 --> 01:42:51.680
and when they see the
card the party starts
01:42:51.680 --> 01:42:59.380
they start looking at
each other. "it's red"
01:42:59.820 --> 01:43:02.380
and they look at you
01:43:02.680 --> 01:43:06.020
they don't understand anything
it's like they are in limbo
01:43:06.100 --> 01:43:08.960
but it's fascinating to understand
the psychology behind it
01:43:08.960 --> 01:43:12.500
because you are building
the spectator for the trick
01:43:12.500 --> 01:43:15.440
and you can do that if you know
where and how to put it there
01:43:15.660 --> 01:43:20.980
the card right now is giant, it shines
01:43:20.980 --> 01:43:25.700
it's like the northern star
01:43:25.700 --> 01:43:34.500
it's absolutely blinding so now
they won't see the sleight
01:43:34.500 --> 01:43:39.580
they can't see, all the see
is the 3 dancing in their mind
01:43:39.580 --> 01:43:43.580
you could load an elephant here
and nobody will know
01:43:43.580 --> 01:43:46.220
but you have to understand why
01:43:46.220 --> 01:43:50.480
you could switch the deck too
so it's red so it has to be
01:43:50.480 --> 01:43:56.600
diamonds or hearts, they say yes but
they're still troubled about the 3
01:43:56.600 --> 01:44:01.600
they can barely listen now
01:44:01.600 --> 01:44:07.240
they can only think of the
3, so understand that state
01:44:07.240 --> 01:44:13.220
diamonds or hearts, now if
this comes up it's a killer
01:44:13.220 --> 01:44:15.720
because if a heart comes out now
01:44:17.900 --> 01:44:21.020
the impression is still the same
01:44:21.020 --> 01:44:26.960
because even though it is hearts
the card is right here
01:44:26.960 --> 01:44:33.060
but if clubs comes out
then it's very clear
01:44:33.060 --> 01:44:37.700
diamonds or hearts? clubs!
01:44:37.700 --> 01:44:43.860
they think I'm completely screwed
01:44:43.860 --> 01:44:51.500
and they wonder how am I going to
get out of this, before it went well
01:44:51.500 --> 01:44:59.200
it was a black card but yours was
clubs, so there's less contrast
01:44:59.200 --> 01:45:06.760
but here is great, and now you
can say with conviction
01:45:06.760 --> 01:45:11.760
the color of the selected card, red!
01:45:11.760 --> 01:45:21.020
you're feeling great, now the
next will tell me the suit
01:45:21.020 --> 01:45:26.020
the suit, I hope luck is on my side
01:45:26.020 --> 01:45:31.320
spades! well
01:45:32.100 --> 01:45:42.220
a red spade... so then you do a little
pep talk and that get some laughs
01:45:42.220 --> 01:45:49.620
because now you know you're screwed
01:45:49.620 --> 01:45:55.280
but this 3 is great
01:45:55.340 --> 01:45:57.340
you must understand
the importance of that
01:45:57.340 --> 01:46:04.080
that card can sell itself very strongly
01:46:04.080 --> 01:46:08.180
so the you say the real important thing
is the position of your card
01:46:08.180 --> 01:46:10.420
this is not so important
01:46:10.420 --> 01:46:15.460
the next card tells me where your card is
01:46:15.460 --> 01:46:18.420
and now because we've been
getting rid of the single cards
01:46:18.420 --> 01:46:23.940
but if you press a little
harder you can pull two
01:46:23.940 --> 01:46:28.580
it requires a little more practice
01:46:28.580 --> 01:46:35.600
so now your loading the ace
and the next that will be seen
01:46:35.600 --> 01:46:42.380
and that also positions the
selected card 4th from top
01:46:42.380 --> 01:46:48.420
"that means that no matter
how I shuffle or cut
01:46:48.420 --> 01:46:50.420
when I count 4 cards the
last will be yours"
01:46:50.420 --> 01:46:57.460
now you keep you composure because
everybody knows the 3 is here
01:46:57.460 --> 01:47:00.060
they all think it's going to go wrong
01:47:00.060 --> 01:47:03.000
what a beginning, everything's
going wrong
01:47:03.000 --> 01:47:07.400
they have to like you, these tricks
with apparent mistakes
01:47:07.400 --> 01:47:11.260
have a thing because they
test the audience very well
01:47:11.260 --> 01:47:14.940
they have to feel bad when you screw up
01:47:14.940 --> 01:47:23.220
if they don't is because
they don't like you
01:47:23.220 --> 01:47:27.940
but if they like you they'll
have a hard time
01:47:27.940 --> 01:47:30.920
and that helps to make
the ending stronger
01:47:30.920 --> 01:47:38.980
because everybody is happy
and everything works
01:47:38.980 --> 01:47:43.980
so I keep conviction and
count the 4 cards
01:47:43.980 --> 01:47:46.660
and now I ask do you really think this
could possibly be your card?
01:47:46.660 --> 01:47:48.780
they say no
01:47:48.780 --> 01:47:51.180
well, thank you fro trusting the artist
01:47:51.180 --> 01:47:54.180
but we're here to watch the impossible
01:47:54.180 --> 01:47:56.960
so if you think it's impossible
that this is your card then
01:47:56.960 --> 01:47:59.660
maybe just because of that
this card is no other that
01:47:59.660 --> 01:48:01.960
and everybody wants me to show the card
01:48:01.960 --> 01:48:06.960
and that's what I don't want, I want to
tease them for a long as I can
01:48:06.960 --> 01:48:12.120
there's the 3, they don't understand
anything, the top change is a joke
01:48:12.120 --> 01:48:18.860
make a comment or something
and leave it there
01:48:19.900 --> 01:48:29.660
now we have to find out why the surprise
so they say they saw it here
01:48:29.660 --> 01:48:34.660
and it goes from being here to
not being there absolutely
01:48:34.660 --> 01:48:40.120
now there's an ace here, and
it's not alone there's two more
01:48:40.260 --> 01:48:46.420
and the card you just saw
turns into that last ace
01:48:46.420 --> 01:48:53.440
great, I did another top change here,
so there's 4 and you can move on
01:48:53.440 --> 01:48:57.080
this trick is great as an opener but
01:48:57.160 --> 01:49:00.260
to use it in the middle of a set it
would be the worst version
01:49:00.260 --> 01:49:09.200
of the typical circus trick or the
Vernon's fingerprint trick
01:49:09.200 --> 01:49:17.980
or an impossible bet where the selected
card is among the eliminated ones
01:49:17.980 --> 01:49:24.460
they all belong to the same
family, the apparent mistake
01:49:24.460 --> 01:49:28.220
every time is clearer that you're screwed
01:49:28.220 --> 01:49:32.860
and at the end everybody's
happy and pleased
01:49:32.860 --> 01:49:38.100
or Vernon's 4 of a kind, a 7, a 7, a 7,
the we turn it and it's a 10
01:49:38.100 --> 01:49:40.440
so now we do some magic
and they all turn to 10's
01:49:40.440 --> 01:49:49.220
the best card trick ever, because it
shows the power of the magician
01:49:49.220 --> 01:50:00.080
in its purest form, the best card
trick in the world for sure, but
01:50:00.080 --> 01:50:03.140
out of that family of apparent
mistakes tricks
01:50:03.140 --> 01:50:05.460
this is the worst unless
you use it as an opener
01:50:05.460 --> 01:50:07.160
because the sin
01:50:08.340 --> 01:50:11.200
of producing the aces that have nothing
to do with the trick is forgiven
01:50:11.200 --> 01:50:15.500
this is what I call to wash
with dirty water
01:50:15.500 --> 01:50:19.140
if you do an ambitious card where
the card ends inside the wallet
01:50:19.140 --> 01:50:20.960
you are washing with dirty water
01:50:21.220 --> 01:50:25.220
I mean the better the
ending with the wallet
01:50:25.220 --> 01:50:27.860
the worst for rest of the routine
01:50:27.860 --> 01:50:29.880
because it's going to wipe
it out of memory
01:50:29.880 --> 01:50:36.000
so you're working for nothing, you're
washing the floor with dirty water
01:50:36.000 --> 01:50:41.580
you're putting the effort and the work
and in the end it's worthless
01:50:41.580 --> 01:50:48.220
because doing a great trick that ends
with something that doesn't fit
01:50:48.220 --> 01:50:53.460
the more elaborate the worse because
01:50:53.460 --> 01:51:05.900
the ending will wipe everything out, and
that's what the aces do here
01:51:05.900 --> 01:51:10.380
it helps psychologically to put
the spectator in a place
01:51:10.380 --> 01:51:13.100
where I can keep manipulating him
later so it works great as an opener
01:51:13.100 --> 01:51:18.080
but it would be very bad to use
it in the middle of a session
01:51:18.080 --> 01:51:23.080
and with that I say good bye
01:52:05.740 --> 01:52:09.820
We had some time to leave the room,
01:52:09.820 --> 01:52:11.960
so we can be more intimate,
how did you feel?
01:52:12.740 --> 01:52:21.340
-well, great, awesome
-they're applauding there, another round of applause
01:52:21.340 --> 01:52:26.340
thanks for sharing all that
information with us
01:52:26.340 --> 01:52:31.900
so now we'll ask you some
personal questions, let's start
01:52:31.900 --> 01:52:40.220
with what we call the
fast five at Kaps live
01:52:40.220 --> 01:52:47.860
-it rhymes very well
-as long as someone knows what it means because I don't
01:52:47.860 --> 01:52:50.980
to give you s straight answer
I can tell you that
01:52:50.980 --> 01:52:57.320
non-magic books there
are too many to mention
01:52:57.320 --> 01:53:00.740
a magic book would have to be
an undervalued book which is
01:53:00.740 --> 01:53:02.980
"magic and showmanship" by H.
Nelms is very fundamental
01:53:03.080 --> 01:53:04.120
and well read
01:53:04.300 --> 01:53:07.800
-A magician
-Tommy Wonder
01:53:07.800 --> 01:53:11.380
because he challenged himself
all his life, that's very rare
01:53:11.500 --> 01:53:17.800
-a spectator?
-a spectator? by name?
01:53:18.740 --> 01:53:23.700
a friend from my childhood who I used
as a Guinea pig all the time
01:53:23.700 --> 01:53:25.500
and he was very discreet
01:53:25.500 --> 01:53:29.380
even though he knew every secret
he never opened his mouth
01:53:29.380 --> 01:53:33.580
everybody should have a friend like that
01:53:33.940 --> 01:53:39.000
-A sleight?
-A Sleight
01:53:39.000 --> 01:53:43.260
I wouldn't know what to say, I'm
not in love with sleights
01:53:43.260 --> 01:53:50.300
I consider it like Ascanio says
in its right measure
01:53:51.160 --> 01:53:55.020
for example techniques that serve many
purposes are not attractive to me
01:53:55.020 --> 01:53:57.780
the cull is too universal,
that's bad for magic
01:53:59.540 --> 01:54:01.440
those are cages made of gold
01:54:01.560 --> 01:54:05.420
-A trick
-A trick?
01:54:05.420 --> 01:54:10.120
out of the many possibilities
01:54:10.120 --> 01:54:18.240
I would say if it's mine or
a my version of a trick
01:54:18.240 --> 01:54:23.240
very intense and feeling would
be the "flor de coleridge"
01:54:23.240 --> 01:54:27.100
and if it's about classic card magic
01:54:27.100 --> 01:54:29.260
it would have to be the
Vernon's 4 of kind
01:54:30.420 --> 01:54:36.180
-Gabi I want to know who would you
say are your biggest influences
01:54:36.180 --> 01:54:39.820
outside magic?
01:54:39.820 --> 01:54:42.860
I could say many names
01:54:42.860 --> 01:54:48.580
but knowing the names or the
books would be too much
01:54:48.580 --> 01:54:51.980
because I've always read to steal stuff
01:54:51.980 --> 01:54:57.400
for magic and not to defend
the author's opinion
01:54:57.400 --> 01:55:06.660
the tapestry is too complex to pull
back every string to where it belongs
01:55:06.740 --> 01:55:09.340
it's an infinite debt with
a lot of people
01:55:09.340 --> 01:55:13.180
magicians and laymen, for
example Luis Garcia
01:55:13.580 --> 01:55:18.780
was fundamental for the magical concepts
that I've developed over time
01:55:18.860 --> 01:55:25.040
Juan, Ascanio infinitely, Carroll also
01:55:25.040 --> 01:55:28.340
and out of magic there are many more
01:55:28.340 --> 01:55:30.800
but there's something I call
"books for sensitivity"
01:55:30.800 --> 01:55:37.820
and those are 10 or 12 books
01:55:37.820 --> 01:55:40.580
for something that I learned
from Kaps through Ascanio
01:55:40.580 --> 01:55:42.740
and it is mind, heart, and hand
01:55:42.740 --> 01:55:45.260
which are concepts, technique
and sensitivity
01:55:45.260 --> 01:55:49.140
so we take care of the technique,
many care about the concepts
01:55:49.140 --> 01:55:51.100
but nobody talks about sensitivity
01:55:51.100 --> 01:55:57.600
so that private collection are
just of books for sensitivity
01:55:57.600 --> 01:56:01.980
like "concerning the spiritual
in art" by kandinsky
01:56:01.980 --> 01:56:08.700
"letters to a young poet" by R. M. Rilke
01:56:08.700 --> 01:56:13.700
"The Book of Disquiet"
by Fernando Pessoa
01:56:13.700 --> 01:56:19.900
I want to name another one
but its not coming to mind
01:56:19.900 --> 01:56:32.400
"art and experience" by a Spanish
professor but I can't recall the name
01:56:32.400 --> 01:56:38.900
"libertad como pasion"
by daniel innerarity
01:56:38.900 --> 01:56:41.160
who is a great thinker from this country
01:56:41.160 --> 01:56:44.780
I'm not interested in politics
so I don't follow him there
01:56:44.780 --> 01:56:48.560
Another renowned author
01:56:48.560 --> 01:56:54.460
from whom I've taken lots from
is Jose Antonio Marina
01:56:54.460 --> 01:56:59.900
All of his books from "elogios
y refutacion del ingenio"
01:56:59.900 --> 01:57:04.120
to "teoria de la inteligencia creadora"
and "La selva del lenguaje"
01:57:05.200 --> 01:57:08.300
"el laberinto sentimental"
"etica para naufragos"
01:57:08.300 --> 01:57:11.380
Savater is another powerful thinker
01:57:11.380 --> 01:57:16.260
I don't think Savater is completely
right for sensitivity
01:57:16.260 --> 01:57:18.340
but "etica para amador"
01:57:18.340 --> 01:57:23.640
I think is a good read no matter
what age you are
01:57:23.760 --> 01:57:30.640
because it teaches you
the real value of ethics
01:57:30.660 --> 01:57:33.620
which is something no one talks about in magic
01:57:33.620 --> 01:57:37.900
I call it the dirty underwear ethics
01:57:37.900 --> 01:57:39.940
because you know if you
have changed or not
01:57:39.940 --> 01:57:43.040
even if it doesn't show, morals
are social ethics are personal
01:57:43.040 --> 01:57:47.460
just like excellence is something
you demand to yourself
01:57:47.460 --> 01:57:50.980
so it's an ethical concept
01:57:54.420 --> 01:57:57.420
making everybody see and feel the same
01:57:57.420 --> 01:57:59.320
the yes and yes cover has ethical roots
01:57:59.320 --> 01:58:03.400
I think is something you owe to yourself
01:58:05.040 --> 01:58:08.520
-That's a lot of homework
- yes, go work then.
01:58:08.580 --> 01:58:12.780
only if you want, it's not mandatory
01:58:12.780 --> 01:58:17.300
talking about the fictional conception
01:58:17.300 --> 01:58:22.640
you've always talked about the need
to think about the spectator
01:58:22.640 --> 01:58:25.360
what do you think is the part
of the spectator in magic
01:58:25.360 --> 01:58:32.660
it's essential because the magic view
of the world becomes impossible
01:58:32.660 --> 01:58:37.220
because we don't have it so we
have to be reminded of it
01:58:37.220 --> 01:58:39.520
but there's no direct way to do that
01:58:39.520 --> 01:58:44.340
so the spectator saves us from that
01:58:44.340 --> 01:58:48.020
so we can't lose sight of the
spectator in that sense
01:58:48.440 --> 01:58:51.180
that's the best gift that you can
get from a spectator
01:58:51.180 --> 01:58:52.340
seeing something for the first time
01:58:52.340 --> 01:58:55.680
so you have to look at magic from
that point of view always
01:58:55.680 --> 01:58:59.420
you always have to think about
the magic from outside
01:58:59.420 --> 01:59:02.520
outside and rescue that guy
because he's very important
01:59:02.520 --> 01:59:04.780
there's a lot to learn there
01:59:04.780 --> 01:59:08.420
in fact the best version of a game is
the one that the spectator makes
01:59:08.420 --> 01:59:10.900
for better or worse,
so let's strive for better
01:59:10.900 --> 01:59:18.340
let's look for whatever makes
him build that ideal version
01:59:18.340 --> 01:59:23.320
of the trick in his mind that he can
share later like Juan says
01:59:23.320 --> 01:59:26.180
memorability is very important
01:59:26.180 --> 01:59:29.400
and it must be something
to look for in tricks
01:59:31.120 --> 01:59:36.380
in the fictional conception you always
point the difference between
01:59:36.380 --> 01:59:39.040
the "prestimano" and the "magical self"
01:59:39.040 --> 01:59:43.640
that are to different things, could
you elaborate on that?
01:59:43.640 --> 01:59:46.280
of course, that comes from
the non magic readings
01:59:46.280 --> 01:59:49.860
in literature the talk about the
writer and the narrator
01:59:49.860 --> 01:59:52.380
in theater about the actor
and the character
01:59:52.380 --> 01:59:56.940
and those shades are important
because the writer writes
01:59:56.940 --> 02:00:00.640
but he has to choose a narrative
voice inside the fictional space
02:00:00.640 --> 02:00:05.120
where the novel or the story
exist. who is the narrator?
02:00:05.120 --> 02:00:07.420
is the same writer but if he is a witness
02:00:07.420 --> 02:00:10.120
a protagonist or an omniscient being
02:00:10.120 --> 02:00:13.660
his perception about that
space is different
02:00:13.660 --> 02:00:17.360
as a witness it can only talk
about what he's seen
02:00:17.360 --> 02:00:22.940
likewise if he's the protagonist he can
add feelings, memories and more
02:00:23.100 --> 02:00:28.220
and it can imagine things about
others but it can't be sure
02:00:28.220 --> 02:00:29.280
an omniscient narrator can
02:00:29.280 --> 02:00:33.340
the omniscient narrator knows all
02:00:33.340 --> 02:00:37.740
and I think those characters
are relevant to magic
02:00:37.740 --> 02:00:43.060
and the actor is the same, the actor knows
everything about the character
02:00:43.060 --> 02:00:45.220
but the character only lives
the present of the play
02:00:45.220 --> 02:00:47.460
even if the actor knows that
02:00:47.460 --> 02:00:47.500
the character it's going to die in the next scene
02:00:47.500 --> 02:00:50.780
as a character he can't be aware of that
02:00:50.780 --> 02:00:52.980
he knows it as an actor but
not as a character
02:00:52.980 --> 02:00:59.980
so he must act as if he's
not going to die
02:00:59.980 --> 02:01:02.100
magicians also have that inner conflict
02:01:02.200 --> 02:01:05.860
so to avoid that is separating the
"prestimano" and the "magic self"
02:01:05.860 --> 02:01:10.620
the prestimano is who thinks, theorizes,
rehearses and makes decisions
02:01:10.620 --> 02:01:17.040
specially in sleight of hand and the
magical self is who's going to act
02:01:17.040 --> 02:01:19.360
among the choices the
prestimano has to make
02:01:19.380 --> 02:01:22.300
are creating the magical self
and creating the spectator
02:01:22.300 --> 02:01:24.780
what kind of magician
needs to do this trick
02:01:24.780 --> 02:01:26.980
and what kind of spectator
I want to create
02:01:27.160 --> 02:01:30.780
the spectator is not there waiting for
you, you have to make him
02:01:30.780 --> 02:01:36.920
and change him mentally so
that he can feel touched
02:01:36.920 --> 02:01:39.900
because there's a connection
between the spectator
02:01:39.900 --> 02:01:43.960
and the construction of the trick
02:01:43.960 --> 02:01:48.200
because it was thought with
that look in mind
02:01:48.200 --> 02:01:51.800
if no one's looking you're
good with just books
02:01:51.920 --> 02:01:54.900
what book would you take
to a desert island?
02:01:54.900 --> 02:01:56.580
I wouldn't take a book
I'd take a spectator
02:01:56.580 --> 02:02:01.820
of course if you can take a
book I know you can
02:02:01.820 --> 02:02:03.000
because there's no one looking
02:02:03.200 --> 02:02:08.260
because the thing that's missing in most
magic books is the spectator
02:02:09.100 --> 02:02:14.500
and that drive me mad because I want
to know about the guy that's looking
02:02:14.500 --> 02:02:17.280
and what's going on with him and
I want to learn from that
02:02:17.280 --> 02:02:21.180
so when I do that trick for someone else
02:02:21.180 --> 02:02:25.200
I can be conscious about
the inner state of people
02:02:28.500 --> 02:02:31.840
the one that relates to the spectator
is the magical self
02:02:31.840 --> 02:02:35.860
of course, but the prestimano
must know the psychology
02:02:35.860 --> 02:02:39.640
the prestimano is the one
that reads Ascanio
02:02:39.640 --> 02:02:44.200
and in any case the magical self is
the one the experiences it
02:02:44.200 --> 02:02:51.960
for the prestimano life is what
happens while he thinks
02:02:51.960 --> 02:02:56.960
for the magic self life is life, so
thinking is for the prestimano
02:02:56.960 --> 02:03:02.580
the magic self lives in the present
02:03:02.580 --> 02:03:06.620
because magic is an art of time not space
02:03:06.620 --> 02:03:10.600
and of the present not a virtual time or
02:03:10.600 --> 02:03:13.420
something you can file or store,
02:03:13.420 --> 02:03:18.280
is not the movie time which is also is a
virtual value inside a movie
02:03:18.280 --> 02:03:22.580
but the present of the magic
self is the present time
02:03:22.580 --> 02:03:26.280
you get old as you preform
02:03:26.280 --> 02:03:29.820
I'm not the same that walked in
02:03:29.820 --> 02:03:31.740
and the spectator shouldn't
be the same either
02:03:31.740 --> 02:03:34.940
the spectator that started
watching the show
02:03:34.940 --> 02:03:36.440
can't be the same by the time you finish
02:03:36.440 --> 02:03:42.100
that guy changes along the trick
and you change with him
02:03:42.100 --> 02:03:50.380
so classifying the trick as openers,
closers, strong one, visuals
02:03:50.380 --> 02:03:56.400
I think is very poor and childish in any
case it should be more profound
02:03:56.400 --> 02:04:03.460
how to compose a trick so that the
person who watches it
02:04:03.460 --> 02:04:08.140
has changed by the time I'm done
02:04:08.720 --> 02:04:10.500
there are many ways
02:04:10.500 --> 02:04:15.460
so now you have to think about what
enriches him and what changes him
02:04:15.460 --> 02:04:19.300
I don't like the James Bond
type of magicians
02:04:19.300 --> 02:04:23.040
who come out of the beach
with perfect hair
02:04:23.040 --> 02:04:26.780
you can't come out of the session
like nothing happened
02:04:26.780 --> 02:04:31.420
at least sweat a little
02:04:31.420 --> 02:04:35.940
there are close up magic sessions
that if you walk
02:04:35.940 --> 02:04:38.740
into the room after it's over
you don't see anything
02:04:38.740 --> 02:04:41.500
not even a piece of paper in the ground
02:04:41.500 --> 02:04:43.740
it doesn't look like anything
happened, and there are others
02:04:43.740 --> 02:04:46.740
and you can't stop wondering
about what might have happened there
02:04:46.740 --> 02:04:48.740
that's living magic
02:04:49.760 --> 02:04:54.140
if someone who has no idea
of what was going on
02:04:54.140 --> 02:04:57.840
comes in and sees and starts wondering
02:04:57.840 --> 02:05:06.960
something happened there, just like
the houses from the magazines
02:05:06.960 --> 02:05:10.580
they look like no one
has ever lived there
02:05:10.580 --> 02:05:16.580
everything's so perfect that looks fake
02:05:16.580 --> 02:05:21.020
it's the same, anything a pacifier,
a toy, something on the floor
02:05:21.020 --> 02:05:25.160
life weaving through the experience
02:05:25.160 --> 02:05:31.800
take you jacket off, lose your
hair, do something
02:05:31.800 --> 02:05:39.180
sweat a little, and if somebody
comes later
02:05:39.180 --> 02:05:47.240
and sees everything it would have to
notice it like "what happened here"
02:05:47.240 --> 02:05:52.460
reality itself is talking to you, that's
what a magic session should be
02:05:52.460 --> 02:05:55.980
the James Bond magicians can stay home
02:05:55.980 --> 02:06:00.280
before you mentioned Juan (Tamariz),
Arturo (Ascanio) and Pepe (Carroll)
02:06:00.280 --> 02:06:03.500
-the inevitables
-the inevitables yes.
02:06:03.500 --> 02:06:07.260
you've recognized them as your
teachers as well as Micky Conesa
02:06:07.260 --> 02:06:12.100
yes, and it's impossible to think
about magic without them
02:06:12.100 --> 02:06:15.320
how is your relationship with them
02:06:15.320 --> 02:06:24.040
well everybody has their own story
02:06:24.040 --> 02:06:28.980
different and separated but very punctual
02:06:28.980 --> 02:06:32.940
Micky Conesa was my friend and teacher
02:06:32.940 --> 02:06:36.200
when there was too much secrecy and
mistery around magic knowledge
02:06:36.200 --> 02:06:39.340
in that time knowledge was equal to power
02:06:39.340 --> 02:06:45.280
so when you shared you lost your power
02:06:45.280 --> 02:06:50.980
a lot of class discrimination
and also about knowledge
02:06:50.980 --> 02:06:55.180
so people who went to Madrid, the ones
that speak english it was important
02:06:55.180 --> 02:06:57.980
it was important
02:06:57.980 --> 02:07:02.540
it was important to have all
the sources of knowledge
02:07:07.740 --> 02:07:13.340
when I met Micky Conesa he taught
me everything he knew
02:07:13.340 --> 02:07:16.880
the way he knew it with
absolute generosity
02:07:16.880 --> 02:07:23.980
later I could judge the tricks for myself
02:07:23.980 --> 02:07:34.080
if they were good or not so much but he
shared everything he had with me
02:07:34.080 --> 02:07:45.080
he's my friend and teacher and everyone
should have one person like that
02:07:45.080 --> 02:07:50.340
someone who opens up and pushes you
02:07:50.340 --> 02:07:52.540
to acquire knowledge that you
can't get any other way
02:07:52.640 --> 02:07:56.480
also he reads a lot and he knows
a great deal about magic
02:07:56.480 --> 02:08:02.840
my relation with Ascanio is
only through reading
02:08:02.840 --> 02:08:06.780
Juan is a teacher from life
watch Juan perform
02:08:06.780 --> 02:08:12.500
is a permanent lesson
without question
02:08:12.600 --> 02:08:16.020
I could spend a long time talking about
02:08:16.020 --> 02:08:21.040
the things that me and others
have learned from Juan
02:08:21.040 --> 02:08:29.800
Mr. Tamariz is inexhaustible so you
can't think without him
02:08:29.800 --> 02:08:36.660
even if you try to contradict or prove him
wrong, that's also convenient
02:08:36.660 --> 02:08:42.720
critic, friction, debate
02:08:42.720 --> 02:08:53.420
I worship Juan but I'm not him so
I can't think exactly like him
02:08:53.420 --> 02:08:57.700
I think he has the best
definition of magic
02:08:57.700 --> 02:09:01.000
he has the answer to many
questions. the magic as art
02:09:01.000 --> 02:09:05.980
a very different experience that no
other art can't create by itself
02:09:05.980 --> 02:09:09.860
every art is differentiated by the unique
experience that they create
02:09:09.860 --> 02:09:13.720
every art creates a different reaction from
all the other possible arts
02:09:13.720 --> 02:09:17.020
what's magic reaction? the
mistery of the impossible
02:09:17.020 --> 02:09:18.720
Juan talks about all of that
02:09:18.720 --> 02:09:21.260
and to this day I agree with that
02:09:21.260 --> 02:09:24.100
what I don't agree with
is with how is applied
02:09:24.680 --> 02:09:29.460
he applies it so the intellect
gives up to the feelings
02:09:29.460 --> 02:09:32.040
and the rainbow and everything else
02:09:32.040 --> 02:09:41.460
that's "the how", "the what" I kneel to
"the what" I light candles to
02:09:41.460 --> 02:09:45.400
and everything because without him all
of this would be very different
02:09:45.740 --> 02:09:49.040
wht this man has done for
magic is invaluable
02:09:49.040 --> 02:09:53.460
"the how" I disagree with and I'll say it
to him or the pope or even god
02:09:53.460 --> 02:09:58.460
"the how" is mine and nobody
can take it away
02:09:58.460 --> 02:10:03.880
I decide that. "the what" is there,
"the how" belong to me
02:10:03.880 --> 02:10:08.380
that's private. and that's Juan
02:10:08.380 --> 02:10:15.840
and Pepe Carrol performed 6 days a week
02:10:15.840 --> 02:10:26.920
he would do table hopping stealing watches
and load them into card boxes
02:10:26.920 --> 02:10:29.340
during the half show he would
do parlour magic
02:10:29.340 --> 02:10:32.100
and then he did 2 stage acts
02:10:32.200 --> 02:10:40.500
a parlour magic act, and a card manipulation
act and after all of that
02:10:40.500 --> 02:10:43.780
a one and a half hour of
close up magic set
02:10:43.780 --> 02:10:45.260
sorrounded by people, all of
that every single night
02:10:45.260 --> 02:10:50.080
and during those last session
he did the whole 52 lovers
02:10:50.080 --> 02:10:54.380
let's check the tricks and see how
easy the are, they are not!
02:10:54.380 --> 02:11:01.140
if you ever saw the glove color change
in front of the spectator
02:11:01.140 --> 02:11:07.180
and he took the gloves from the table
02:11:07.180 --> 02:11:09.860
two white gloves, he folded them
and open them back
02:11:09.860 --> 02:11:12.680
and one was red and the other was black
02:11:12.680 --> 02:11:15.460
he puts them on and did a
follow the leader routine
02:11:15.580 --> 02:11:18.000
and he did that at a table width
from the spectators
02:11:18.000 --> 02:11:20.180
that was close up magic
in all of its glory
02:11:20.180 --> 02:11:22.300
and that's a big point of
ebate these days
02:11:22.300 --> 02:11:26.060
if the spectator has to stand
up to pick the card
02:11:26.060 --> 02:11:27.900
then that's not close up magic,
02:11:27.900 --> 02:11:32.600
if they have to stand up to take the card
then that's not close up magic
02:11:32.600 --> 02:11:36.260
close up magic is up close
02:11:36.260 --> 02:11:39.120
it the mat smells like vinegar
they have to smell it
02:11:39.120 --> 02:11:46.600
everything, if you have not taken
a shower you're screwed
02:11:46.600 --> 02:11:51.080
but far away it doesn't matter
02:11:51.080 --> 02:11:54.420
close up magic is very close all around
02:11:54.420 --> 02:11:56.420
and that's and added value
that's always been there
02:11:56.420 --> 02:12:02.900
the closeness, not because they
interact more or shuffle
02:12:02.900 --> 02:12:08.100
eve if just an exhibition if they're
looking from there
02:12:08.100 --> 02:12:13.940
it's totally different and that difference
adds artistic value to magic
02:12:13.940 --> 02:12:18.940
and demands skill from the magician
02:12:18.940 --> 02:12:24.200
is not that easy
02:12:24.860 --> 02:12:29.480
-that' a great answer
-I do what I can
02:12:29.480 --> 02:12:35.820
could you define stages of
your magical conceptions?
02:12:35.820 --> 02:12:39.700
it's difficult because the concerns
come before that
02:12:39.700 --> 02:12:41.640
hat and you don't were they come from
02:12:41.640 --> 02:12:48.980
but there's a state of satisfaction
that you need to absorb
02:12:48.980 --> 02:12:54.520
I've never understood why some people
care about this and others don't
02:12:54.520 --> 02:12:59.520
so you can't say if you don't this
or if you don't read that
02:12:59.520 --> 02:13:04.520
you can't be a magician,
you can't say that
02:13:05.060 --> 02:13:13.860
because you are defined by your needs
and the way you fulfill them
02:13:13.860 --> 02:13:17.100
that led me to reading outside magic
02:13:17.100 --> 02:13:19.440
but I don't think I'm able to explain it
02:13:19.440 --> 02:13:25.340
but what I did was to look for people
who knew more than me
02:13:25.340 --> 02:13:27.020
and that's something you
always have to do
02:13:27.020 --> 02:13:29.820
listen to who knows
02:13:29.820 --> 02:13:32.780
and at least learn how to distinguish
between who knows and who doesn't
02:13:32.780 --> 02:13:37.200
be humble enough to admit
you have no idea
02:13:37.200 --> 02:13:43.780
like socrates said "I know that I know
nothing" just look for who knows
02:13:43.780 --> 02:13:48.540
and that's how my non
magic reading started
02:13:48.540 --> 02:13:52.280
he magic and the arts,
the queen of the arts
02:13:52.280 --> 02:13:57.280
and nobody knew anything
about that, magic and art
02:13:58.420 --> 02:14:05.960
it was like a bad joke, so I want to read
about art what can I read?
02:14:05.960 --> 02:14:13.660
and a friend who I respected very much told me
02:14:13.660 --> 02:14:18.460
"the necessity of art" by Ernst Fisher
02:14:18.460 --> 02:14:20.960
and "la definicion del arte"
by umberto eco
02:14:20.960 --> 02:14:24.820
understanding that book
takes a lot of work
02:14:24.820 --> 02:14:28.980
and those were the book with which I
started the non magic reading
02:14:28.980 --> 02:14:35.540
in my twenties, by that time I
used to work as a janitor
02:14:35.540 --> 02:14:41.960
because I never wanted to
live out of magic
02:14:41.960 --> 02:14:46.300
that implied to deal with people
I didn't wanted to see
02:14:46.300 --> 02:14:54.100
people that made me change my conception
into something I didn't wanted
02:14:54.220 --> 02:14:59.620
only doing commercial tricks in conditions
02:14:59.620 --> 02:15:02.640
that didn't fit my needs so it was
too high of a price to pay
02:15:04.000 --> 02:15:09.680
and the funny thing is when I worked there
well what they consider work
02:15:09.680 --> 02:15:15.940
I consider it like I was subsidized and I
was paid to read and to be there
02:15:16.260 --> 02:15:22.700
I didn't made a lot of money but
was investing time, not money
02:15:22.700 --> 02:15:27.700
and that was a great time
02:15:28.640 --> 02:15:32.800
reading when you have eternity in front
of you it changes how you read
02:15:33.480 --> 02:15:38.900
reading in a hurry it's difficult but if
you have 8 hours to read
02:15:38.900 --> 02:15:42.020
you can read lots
02:15:47.640 --> 02:15:53.040
I got lost, are you here? I don't know
where I went there
02:15:53.160 --> 02:15:56.980
- so that was what started changing you
and shaping your conceptions
02:15:56.980 --> 02:15:59.960
-but of course, because it's great
02:15:59.960 --> 02:16:02.360
here is where the art of
plagiarism was born
02:16:02.440 --> 02:16:05.300
that is when you change one word
for another one and that's it
02:16:05.300 --> 02:16:07.140
"the bow and the lyre" by Octavio Paz
02:16:07.140 --> 02:16:09.120
change poetry for magic and that's it
02:16:09.360 --> 02:16:13.140
there are machines that can write
poems but not poetry
02:16:13.140 --> 02:16:17.220
likewise there are machines that
can do tricks but not magic
02:16:17.220 --> 02:16:21.540
so when you did this you arrived
to complex thoughts
02:16:21.540 --> 02:16:23.680
and that you'd never find in a book
02:16:23.680 --> 02:16:28.680
so the art of plagiarism well
applied is great
02:16:29.580 --> 02:16:34.020
-one last question
-what a shame
02:16:34.520 --> 02:16:40.920
truly, some months ago I heard you say
02:16:40.920 --> 02:16:45.060
that you aspire to a higher magic
02:16:46.400 --> 02:16:50.700
-so I wanted to ask you what did you
meant by that?
02:16:50.700 --> 02:16:53.880
- I have no idea
02:16:53.880 --> 02:16:57.020
maybe if I said it like that
02:16:58.660 --> 02:17:01.360
maybe it was because of the circumstances
of the moment
02:17:01.360 --> 02:17:06.860
It sound pretentious of me to
say that, so I don't know
02:17:06.860 --> 02:17:12.420
if I had a clearer idea of the context
02:17:12.420 --> 02:17:15.020
it had to do with respect and knowledge
02:17:15.020 --> 02:17:17.280
about all of those thing that
we still need to learn
02:17:17.280 --> 02:17:20.960
magic as an art would be what
I understand by high magic
02:17:21.220 --> 02:17:24.660
but magic as an art can be very humble, you don't have to make a
dinosaur appear
02:17:24.660 --> 02:17:31.120
you don't have to make a dinosaur appear
02:17:31.120 --> 02:17:36.700
we could still do twisting the aces by
Vernon or the dreamed card
02:17:36.700 --> 02:17:41.020
it's a very big difference
02:17:41.020 --> 02:17:44.500
when you understand it as art
instead of a trick or a secret
02:17:44.500 --> 02:17:46.360
or a secret that has to be
hidden as a deception
02:17:46.360 --> 02:17:55.500
something I always say about
fictional magic is that
02:17:55.500 --> 02:18:00.500
the landscape hasn't changed
only the way we look at it
02:18:00.500 --> 02:18:07.320
the trick has the same
requirement as always
02:18:07.320 --> 02:18:15.020
the effect must be clear, the shuffle, the
feeling that the card is lost
02:18:15.020 --> 02:18:17.860
that the spectator remembers
that the deck was shuffled
02:18:17.860 --> 02:18:22.860
preparing them for the impossible
so when the effect hits them
02:18:22.860 --> 02:18:25.500
it does with it's full power,
all of that is the same
02:18:25.500 --> 02:18:27.860
the way of doing it can be very different
02:18:27.860 --> 02:18:33.180
it doesn't have to appeal to the
negative part of the trick
02:18:33.180 --> 02:18:36.580
with "I didn't touch" or "you shuffled"
and stuff like that
02:18:36.580 --> 02:18:40.720
the agnostic magician who dispenses
of the concept of the trick
02:18:40.860 --> 02:18:43.480
as a magician I don't really care
02:18:43.620 --> 02:18:46.660
I'm agnostic, the prestimano
already made his decision
02:18:46.660 --> 02:18:48.980
then when I switch to my magic
self I know he did his job
02:18:48.980 --> 02:18:50.040
and now I'll do mine
02:18:50.040 --> 02:18:53.540
the trick or no trick doesn't
matter to me
02:18:53.540 --> 02:18:57.740
I have different needs to be met with the
presentation of the trick
02:19:00.560 --> 02:19:04.260
even though the effect is a priority
02:19:04.260 --> 02:19:07.180
then the big question from
Juan is "what's the effect?"
02:19:07.180 --> 02:19:11.480
and it's all for the effect
02:19:11.480 --> 02:19:19.280
in my case this translates to
02:19:19.280 --> 02:19:24.140
phenomenons, the effect? a transposition,
the phenomenon?
02:19:24.140 --> 02:19:28.560
I don't know, traslation, dematerialization,
or whatever you want
02:19:28.560 --> 02:19:33.980
the ambitious card, and
why not the obsession?
02:19:33.980 --> 02:19:38.980
which is as abstract as ambition
02:19:38.980 --> 02:19:42.700
but the effect must be clear,
the phenomenon can't win
02:19:42.700 --> 02:19:45.260
the patter can't be more important
than the effect
02:19:45.260 --> 02:19:48.380
and everything depends on the effect
02:19:48.380 --> 02:19:53.780
now the experience demands something
more than the pure effect
02:19:53.780 --> 02:19:58.620
in many occasions, so there's a way of transmitting the experience
to the spectator
02:19:58.620 --> 02:19:58.620
in many occasions, so there's a way of
02:19:58.620 --> 02:20:01.960
transmitting the experience
to the spectator
02:20:01.960 --> 02:20:09.060
the time machine, the feeling that
we traveled back in time even
02:20:09.060 --> 02:20:11.100
but you can feel it on your spine
02:20:11.100 --> 02:20:15.100
the Coleridge flower a dream
stepping into reality
02:20:15.100 --> 02:20:22.220
the spectator counts 10 cards
02:20:22.220 --> 02:20:26.600
and what number did you almost dreamed?
02:20:26.600 --> 02:20:31.600
"for the first time!" that's drama
and it helps the effect
02:20:31.600 --> 02:20:38.860
"now tell me" now, that all
the work's done
02:20:38.860 --> 02:20:46.500
and there's nothing to do. "what number
is dancing in your mind?"
02:20:46.500 --> 02:20:52.380
a 3, "and all the cards are in your
hand" an emotional hook
02:20:52.380 --> 02:20:54.780
that you've set up from the
flower of Coleridge
02:20:54.780 --> 02:20:56.220
and the patter about the dream
02:20:56.300 --> 02:21:03.000
count, 1, 2 and 3 either everybody starts
shaking or I jump out the window
02:21:03.000 --> 02:21:07.340
the timing, the pauses, everything
02:21:07.340 --> 02:21:10.420
the clarity, the effect is understood,
the cards grow
02:21:10.420 --> 02:21:11.840
you imagine a number
02:21:11.880 --> 02:21:14.620
and that number of cards appear
in a packet that was counted
02:21:14.620 --> 02:21:17.700
and it hasn't been touched
02:21:17.700 --> 02:21:20.980
the conditions are the same, the
landscape is untouched
02:21:20.980 --> 02:21:23.060
but they way we're looking
at it is different
02:21:23.060 --> 02:21:26.560
you can do the same many other ways
02:21:26.560 --> 02:21:30.820
but you've never come close to the cards
02:21:30.820 --> 02:21:35.220
how do you achieve the feeling that you
never came close to the packet
02:21:35.340 --> 02:21:39.700
and now are 3 more cards, or 5 or 7
02:21:39.700 --> 02:21:44.120
whatever number the spectator has in mind
02:21:44.120 --> 02:21:51.040
now how to achieve it belongs to
you and there is where
02:21:51.040 --> 02:21:53.180
everybody has to look for it's own way
02:21:53.180 --> 02:21:57.100
to enrich magic with it
and turn it into art
02:21:57.100 --> 02:22:00.040
art is personal
02:22:00.040 --> 02:22:07.280
it starts from our needs and concerns
and how we communicate them
02:22:07.280 --> 02:22:11.100
we are too alike
02:22:11.100 --> 02:22:17.060
even our clothes, everybody
dresses in black
02:22:17.060 --> 02:22:22.060
Gabi thank you so much for all of this
02:22:22.060 --> 02:22:24.880
you leave us with a lot of
homework for digestion
02:22:24.880 --> 02:22:29.860
recorded and everything, don't miss it
02:22:29.980 --> 02:22:34.720
let's give him a big round of applause
02:22:45.880 --> 02:22:51.340
thank you all for being here
02:22:51.340 --> 02:22:54.660
we'll see you next month with Miguel
Gomez and the pleasure of magic
02:22:54.660 --> 02:22:59.660
kisses from grupo Kaps and
we'll see you soon