0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views4 pages

Evidence June 2012

KSLU LAW EVIDENCE LAW Q PAPER

Uploaded by

MITHUN U
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views4 pages

Evidence June 2012

KSLU LAW EVIDENCE LAW Q PAPER

Uploaded by

MITHUN U
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

*0601* 0601

Sixth Semester of Three Year LL.B. Degree Examination, June/July 2012


LAW OF EVIDENCE
Duration : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100

Instructions : 1. Answer all five Questions.


2. One essay type and one short note question or problem
from each unit have to be attempted, which is referred as
part (a) and (b) in all the units.
3. Figures to the right indicate marks.
4. Answers should be written either in English or Kannada
completely.

UNIT – I
Q. No. 1. (a) What is evidence ? State different kinds of evidence. Marks : 15
ÓÝPÜÒ$ Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? ËË«Ü Äࣿá ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂWÜÙÜ®Üá° £ÚÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Define admission and point out the differences between
admission and confession.
J²³Wæ¿á®Üá° ÊÝÂTÝÂ¯Ô ÊÜáñÜᤠJ²³Wæ ÊÜáñÜᤠñܱæä³²³WæWÜÙÜ ®ÜvÜáË®Ü
ÊÜÂñÝÂÓÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÓÜãbÔÄ.
(b) ‘A’ is tried for the murder of ‘B’ by poisoning. Is the fact, that
before the death of ‘B’, ‘A’ procured poison similar to that which
was administered to ‘B’ relevant ? Marks : 5
"Ÿ' ®Ü®Üá° ËÐÜ ÖÝQ Pæãí¨Ü B±Ý¨Ü®æ¿á ÊæáàÇæ "A'®Ü®Üá° ËaÝÃÜOæWæ
JÙܱÜwÓÜÇÝÀáñÜá. "Ÿ'®Üá ÓÝ¿ááÊÜâ¨ÜPÜãR Êæã¨ÜÆá AÊܯWæ ÖÝQ¨Ü
ËÐܨíÜ ñÜÖáÜ ¨æà ËÐÜ樆 áÜ ° "A'®Üá ±Üv¨
æ áÜ Pæãíw¨Üª ÓÜíWÜ£¿áá ÓÜáÓÜퟨÜÊ
œ àæ ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
The question is whether a horse sold by ‘A’ to ‘B’ is sound.
‘A’ says to ‘B’ go and ask ‘C’, ‘C’ knows all about it. When
asked by ‘B’, ‘C’ says that the horse is not sound. Is the
statement made by ‘C’ admissable in evidence ?
"A'®Üá "Ÿ'Wæ ÊÜÞÄ¨Ü PÜá¨ÜáÃæ¿áá ÓÜÌÓܧ˨æÁáàÊæíŸáÊÜ ±ÜÅÍæ° ? "A'®Üá "Ÿ'
Wæ "PÜ 'Wæ ÖæãàX PæàÙÜá AÊܯWæ GÇÝÉ Wæã£¤¨æ. "Ÿ' ®Üá "PÜ ' Wæ PæàÙÜÇÝX B
PÜá¨ÜáÃæ¿áá ÓÜÌÓܧÊÝXÆÉ Gí¨Üá "PÜ '®Üá ÖæàÙÜáÊÜ®Üá. "PÜ ' ÖæàÚPæ¿áá
ÓÝQÒ¿ÞX ÔÌàPÝÃÜÊÝWÜáÊÜâ¨æ ?
P.T.O.
0601 -2- *0601*
UNIT – II

Q. No. 2. (a) State the provisions of Indian Evidence Act relating to facts
which need not be proved. Marks : 15
»ÝÃÜ£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ A—¯¿áÊÜá¨Üw¿áÈÉ ŸÃÜáÊÜ ÓݹàñÜá ÊÜÞvܸæàPÝXÃܨÜ
ÓÜíWÜ£WÜÚWæ ÓÜíŸí«Ü±Üor E±ÜŸí«ÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° £ÚÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Explain the circumstance in which judgements of court become
relevant.
®ÝÂ¿ÞÆ¿á¨Ü £à±ÜâìWÜÙÜá ÓÜáÓÜퟨܜÊÝWÜáÊÜ ÓÜí¨Ü»ÜìWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
(b) ‘A’ is accused of theft. During the police custody he indicated
the place where the stolen goods were hidden and the police
recovered those goods. Can this information be used against ‘A’ ? Marks : 5
"A' ®Üá PÜÙÜÛñÜ®Ü¨Ü B±Ý¨Ü®æWæãÙÜWÝX¨Ýª®æ. ±æäàÈÓÜÃÜ ÊÜÍܨÜÈɨݪWÜ PÜÙÜÛñܮܨÜ
ÊÜÓÜá¤WÜÙÜ®Üá° AvÜXÔor ÓܧÙÜ¨Ü ŸWæY AÊÜ®Üá ÖæàÙÜÇÝX AÊÜÃÜá B ÊÜÓÜá¤WÜÙÜ®Üá°
ÊÜͱ
Ü wÜ ÔPæãíw¨ÝªÃ.æ D ÖæàÚPæ¿á®Üá° "A' ®Ü ËÃÜá¨Üœ E±ÜÁãàXÓܟÖÜá¨æà ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
The question is whether ‘A’ was the legitimate son of ‘B’ ? Is
the fact ‘A’ was always treated as such by the members of the
family relevant ?
"A' ®Üá "Ÿ'®Ü ®Ý¿៨ܜ ÊÜáWÜ®æà ? G®Üá°ÊÜâ¨Üá ®ÝÂ¿ÞÆ¿á¨Ü ÊÜááí¨æ
CñÜÂ¥ÜìÊÝWܸæàPÝ¨Ü ±ÜÅÍæ° C¨ÝªWÜ PÜáoáíŸ¨Ü ÓܨÜÓÜÂÃÜá ¿ÞÊÝWÜÆá
"A' ®Ü®Üá° ÖÝWæ ±ÜÄWÜ~ÓÜᣤ¨ÜªÃÜá, G®Üá°ÊÜâ¨Üá ÓÜáÓÜíŸ¨ÜœÊæà ?
UNIT – III

Q. No. 3. (a) What do you mean by Secondary Evidence ? State the


circumstances in which secondary evidence may be given. Marks : 15
©Ì£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ Gí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? ¿ÞÊÜ ÓÜí¨Ü»ÜìWÜÙÜÈÉ ©Ì£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ÂÊÜ®Üá°
¯àvܟÖÜá¨Üá GíŸá¨Ü®Üá° ÖæàÚÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Define presumptions and explain presumptions as to ancient
documents.
±Ü ä ÊÜ ì »ÝÊÜ ® æ ¿ á®Ü á ° ÊÝÂTÝÂ¯Ô ÊÜ á ñÜ á ¤ ±ÝÅbà®Ü ¨Ü Ó Ý¤ Ê æ à iWæ
ÓÜ í Ÿí—st í ñæ CÃÜáÊÜ ±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æ¿á®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
*0601* -3- 0601

(b) Write a note on public documents. Marks : 5

ÓÝÊÜìg¯PÜ ¨ÜÓÝ¤ÊæàgáWÜÙÜ ŸWæY q±Ü³~ ŸÃæÀáÄ.


OR/A¥ÜÊÝ

Write a note on Hearsay evidence.

PæàÚ £Ú¨Ü ÓÝQÒWÜÙÜ ŸWæY q±Ü³~ ŸÃæÀáÄ.

UNIT – IV

Q. No. 4. (a) Explain the provisions of Indian Evidence Act relating to Burden
of proof. Marks : 15

ÃÜágáÊÝ£®Ü »ÝÃÜ¨Ü ŸWæY »ÝÃÜñÜ ÓÝPÜÒ$ A—¯¿áÊÜá E±ÜŸí«ÜWÜÙÜ®Üá°


ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ

Court may presume existence of certain facts. Discuss.

PæÆ ÓÜíWÜ£WÜÙÜ CÃÜáËPæ ŸWæY ®ÝÂ¿ÞÆ¿áÊÜâ ±ÜäÊÜì»ÝÊÜ®æ ÊÜÞvܟÖÜá¨Üá.


aÜbìÔÄ.
(b) ‘A’ has declared the value of goods as Rs. 500/- at the time of
consignment. On loss of goods, he is claiming the value of
goods much more than Rs. 500/-. Can he be allowed to take
this stand ? Marks : 5

ñܮܰ ÓÜÃÜPÜáWÜÙÜ®Üá° ÓÝWÝ~PæWæ ÖÝPÜáÊÝWÜ "A' ®Üá AÊÜâWÜÙÜ ÊÜåèÆÂÊÜâ


500 ÃÜ ã ±ÝÀáWÜ Ù æ í ¨Ü á Öæàڨܪ®Üá. PÜÙæ¨Üá Öæãà¨ÝWÜ, AÊÜ®Üá AÊÜâWÜÙÜ
ÊÜåèÆÂÊÜâ 500 ÃÜã±ÝÀáWÜÚXíñÜ Öæaæcí¨Üá ÖæàÙÜᣤÃÜáÊÜ®Üá. "A' ¯Wæ AíñÜÖÜ
¯ÆáÊÜ®Üá° ñÜÙæ¿áÆá AÊÜPÝÍÜ˨æÁáà ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ

Promissory Estoppel.

BÍÝÌÓÜ®Ý ±ÜÅ£Ÿí«Ü.
0601 -4- *0601*

UNIT – V

Q. No. 5. (a) Explain the provisions of Indian Evidence Act relating to


competency of witnesses. Marks : 15
ÓÝQÒWÜÙÜ ÓÜÊÜá¥Üìñæ PÜáÄñÜá »ÝÃÜ£à¿á ÓÝPÜÒ$ A—¯¿áÊÜá¨ÜÈÉ CÃÜáÊÜ
E±ÜŸí«ÜWÜÙÜ®Üá° ËÊÜÄÔÄ.
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
What are leading questions ? When they can be asked ?
EñܤÃÜ ÓÜãaÜPÜ ±ÜÅÍæ°WÜÙæí¨ÜÃæà®Üá ? AÊÜâWÜÙÜ®Üá° ¿ÞÊÝWÜ PæàÙܟÖÜá¨Üá ?
(b) ‘A’ a client says to ‘B’ an attorney “I have committed murder of
‘C’ and I wish you to defend me”. Can this communication be
disclosed by an attorney ? Marks : 5
"A' ®æíŸ PÜQÒ¨ÝÃÜ®Üá "Ÿ' GíŸ ®Ý¿áÊÝ©Wæ ""®Ý®Üá ' "PÜ ' ®Ü PæãÇæ
ÊÜÞw¨æªà®æ ÊÜáñÜᤠ¯àÊÜ⠮ܮܰ®Üá° ÃÜQÒÓܸæàPæí¨Üá Ÿ¿áÓÜáñæ¤à®æ '' Gí¨Üá
ÖæàÙÜáñݤ®æ. D £ÚÖæàÚPæ¿á®Üá° ®Ý¿áÊÝ©¿áá ±ÜÅPÜqÓܟÖÜá¨æ ?
OR/A¥ÜÊÝ
Impeaching the credit of witness.
ÓÝQÒ¿á ËÍÝÌÓÝÖÜìñæWæ «ÜPæR ñÜÃÜáÊÜâ¨Üá.
________________

You might also like