RESPONDENTS GENDER TYPE OF SCHOOL

1 F PUBLIC
2 F PUBLIC
3 F PUBLIC
4 F PRIVATE
5 F PRIVATE
6 F PRIVATE
7 M PUBLIC
8 F PRIVATE
9 M PUBLIC
10 M PUBLIC
11 M PRIVATE
12 F PUBLIC
13 F PRIVATE
male 4 PRIVATE 6 YES
female 9 PUBLIC 7 NO

GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

FEMALE 9 69.23
MALE 4 30.77
TOTAL 13 100.00

SCHOOL FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

PRIVATE 6 46.15
PUBLIC 7 53.85
TOTAL 13 100.00

ON DUTERTE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

YES 3 23.08
NO 10 76.92
TOTAL 13 100.00
ON DUTERTE AGE WEIGHT IN KG
NO 25 48
NO 39 54
NO 26 52
NO 22 41
NO 21 52
YES 22 41
NO 32 71
NO 24 53
NO 28 50
NO 23 60
YES 28 62
NO 25 41
YES 31 48
3
10
PROBLEM 1
Create a Frequency Distribution Table For

a. On Duterte Administration ( 1 - Approved ; 2 - Disapproved )

b. Marital Status ( 1 - Married; 2- Single; 3 - Annuled/Separated/Divorce)

RESPONDENTS On Duterte MARITAL STATUS

RESPONDENT 1 1 1
RESPONDENT 2 1 1
RESPONDENT 3 2 2
RESPONDENT 4 2 3
RESPONDENT 5 2 2
RESPONDENT 6 1 2
RESPONDENT 7 2 1
RESPONDENT 8 2 1
RESPONDENT 9 1 2
RESPONDENT 10 2 2
RESPONDENT 11 2 3
RESPONDENT 12 1 1
RESPONDENT 13 1 1
RESPONDENT 14 2 2
RESPONDENT 15 2 3
RESPONDENT 16 1 1
RESPONDENT 17 1 2
RESPONDENT 18 2 2
RESPONDENT 19 2 2
RESPONDENT 20 1 1
APPROVED 9 MARRIED 8
DISAPPROVED 11 SINGLE 9
SEPERATED/ANNULED/DIVORCE 3

RESPONSE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

APPROVED 9 45.00
DISAPPROVED 11 55.00
TOTAL 20 100.00

MARITAL STATUS FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

MARRIED 8 40.00
SINGLE 9 45.00
SEPERATED/ANNULE 3 15.00
TOTAL 20 100.00
A Canteen Services

STAFF PRICE TASTE STAFF VENUE

4 3 3 4 4
3 3 3 4 4
4 3 4 4 3
3 4 4 3 3
4 3 4 4 4
3 3 3 4 3
3 3 3 4 2
3 3 2 4 2
3 3 2 3 3
4 4 4 4 4
3 1 2 3 2
2 4 1 2 1
4 3 2 4 2
1 4 3 2 3
3 3 2 2 2
SUMMARY OF RATINGS

CANTEEN SERVICES 4 3 2 1 TOTAL MEAN

STAFF 5 8 1 1 15 3.133333
PRICE 4 10 0 1 15 3.133333
TASTE 4 5 5 1 15 2.8
STAFF 9 3 3 0 15 3.4
VENUE 4 5 5 1 15 2.8
AVERAGE 5.2 6.2 2.8 0.8 15 3.053333
 Library services
4 - VERY SATISFY
3 - SATISFY
2 - NOT SATISFY
1 - STRONGLY NOT SATISFIED

RESPONDENTS STAFF TEXTBOOKS JOURNAL THESIS SETTING

1 4 3 3 3 4
2 4 3 2 2 4
3 4 3 2 2 4
4 3 3 2 3 4
5 4 3 3 2 4
6 3 3 2 2 3
7 4 3 2 2 3
8 4 3 3 3 4
9 2 2 2 3 2
10 3 3 3 3 3
11 2 1 2 2 3
12 1 2 3 4 1
13 3 2 1 2 3
14 4 2 3 4 3
15 2 1 2 1 3
VERY SATISFY 7 0 0 2 6
SATISFIED 4 9 6 5 7
NOT SATISFIED 3 4 8 7 1
STRONGLY NOT SATISFIED 1 2 1 1 1

4 3 2 1 TOTAL
staff 7 4 3 1 15
TEXTBOOKS 0 9 4 2 15
JOURNAL 0 6 8 1 15
THESIS 2 5 7 1 15
SETTING 6 7 1 1 15
AVERAGE 3 6.2 4.6 1.2 15
MEAN
3.13
2.47
2.33
2.53
3.20
2.73
DATA
AGE
22 mean median mode MAXIMUM MINIMUM RANGE SD Variance
39 35.19 33 33 60 21 39 11.19 125.26
23
30
25
26
24
41
33
60
45
36
21
35
46
58
48
35
33
31
28
SKEWNESS KURTHESIS
0.82 0.07
FINAL EXAMINATON IN INFERENTIAL STATISTICS

GRADES
81 mean median mode MAXIMUM MINIMUM
80 83.33 83 81 95 73
95
74
88
81
89 GRADES 81 80 95 74
77
76
83
84
87
91
91
73
RANGE SD Variance SKEWNESS KURTOSIS
22 6.72 45.10 0.05 -1.02

88 81 89 77 76 83 84 87
91 91 73
 x y x - xbar y-ybar (x-xbar)(y-ybar) x-xbar squared
4 82 0.6 6 3.6 0.36
2 98 -1.4 22 -30.8 1.96
2 76 -1.4 0 0 1.96
3 68 -0.4 -8 3.2 0.16
1 84 -2.4 8 -19.2 5.76
0 99 -3.4 23 -78.2 11.56
4 67 0.6 -9 -5.4 0.36
8 58 4.6 -18 -82.8 21.16
7 50 3.6 -26 -93.6 12.96
3 78 -0.4 2 -0.8 0.16
-304 56.4
X bar Y bar Sxy Sxx
MEAN 3.4 76

CORRELATION Correlation
-0.85 -0.85
Y-Ybar squared
36
484 PEARSON -0.85
0
64
64
529
81
324
676
4
2262
Syy
STUDENT MATH PHYSICS x - xbar y-ybar (x-xbar)(y-ybar) x-xbar squared Y-Ybar squared
1 99 91 13.87 4.2 58.254 192.3769 17.64
2 78 83 -7.13 -3.8 27.094 50.8369 14.44
3 85 84 -0.13 -2.8 0.364 0.0169 7.84
4 96 99 10.87 12.2 132.614 118.1569 148.84
5 80 88 -5.13 1.2 -6.156 26.3169 1.44
6 80 83 -5.13 -3.8 19.494 26.3169 14.44
7 77 76 -8.13 -10.8 87.804 66.0969 116.64
8 73 75 -12.13 -11.8 143.134 147.1369 139.24
9 86 87 0.87 0.2 0.174 0.7569 0.04
10 83 88 -2.13 1.2 -2.556 4.5369 1.44
11 81 88 -4.13 1.2 -4.956 17.0569 1.44
12 85 89 -0.13 2.2 -0.286 0.0169 4.84
13 90 90 4.87 3.2 15.584 23.7169 10.24
14 94 86 8.87 -0.8 -7.096 78.6769 0.64
15 90 95 4.87 8.2 39.934 23.7169 67.24
X bar Y bar
MEAN 85.133333333 86.8

Sxy Sxx Syy

CORRELATION 503.4 775.7335 546.4
0.77

Correlation PEARSON 0.77

0.77 STRONG POSITIVE CORRELATION
 x y rank x rank y D D Squared
4 82 7.5 7 0.5 0.25
2 98 3.5 9 -5.5 30.25
2 76 3.5 5 -1.5 2.25
3 68 5.5 4 1.5 2.25
1 84 2 8 -6 36
0 99 1 10 -9 81
4 67 7.5 3 4.5 20.25
8 58 10 2 8 64
7 50 9 1 8 64
3 78 5.5 6 -0.5 0.25

X bar Y bar Sum D Squared

MEAN 3.4 76 300.5
Spearman Rho

-0.82
Strong negative Correlation
STUDENT MATH PHYSICS RANK RANK P D D Squared
1 99 91 15 13 2 4
2 78 83 3 3.5 -0.5 0.25
3 85 84 8.5 5 3.5 12.25
4 96 99 14 15 -1 1
5 80 88 4.5 9 -4.5 20.25
6 80 83 4.5 3.5 1 1
7 77 76 2 2 0 0
8 73 75 1 1 0 0
9 86 87 10 7 3 9
10 83 88 7 9 -2 4
11 81 88 6 9 -3 9
12 85 89 8.5 11 -2.5 6.25
13 90 90 11.5 12 -0.5 0.25
14 94 86 13 6 7 49
15 90 95 11.5 14 -2.5 6.25
SUM (D Squared) 122.5
 SPEARMAN RHO
0.78
STRONG POSITIVE CORRELATION
 EXAM SCORES in SCIENCE
1. Statement of Hypothesis
General : NO Significance

A B Ho: There is no significant difference between the t

37 26 Ha: There is significant difference between the test
36 28
40 31
28 49 2. Determine the test to be used:
7 20
46 16 T-Test Compares means of 2 variables
42 8
29 14 T-TEST for Independent Samples
36 24
35 36 3. State level of significance
30 26 lpha= .05
14 15
16 4. Obtain P value
21
28 0.07 P-Value

MEAN SCORES 31.67 23.87 5. Decision

p > lpha

6. Conclusion

There is no significant difference between test scores of S

nt difference between the test scores in Science of the students in Section A and section B
difference between the test scores in Science of the students in Section A and section B

ce between test scores of Section A and section B.

 EXAM SCORES in STATISTICS
1. Statement of Hypothesis
General : NO Significance

M F Ho: There is no significant difference between the t

8 6 Ha: There is significant difference between the test
6 7
6 8
10 9 2. Determine the test to be used:
3 5
4 7 T-Test Compares means of 2 variables
2 10
3 8 T-TEST for Independent Samples
6
8 3. State level of significance
lpha= .05

4. Obtain P value

0.051 P-Value

MEAN SCORES 5.25 7.40 5. Decision

p > lpha

6. Conclusion

There is no significant difference between test scores in S

nt difference between the test scores whwn grouped based on gender
difference between the test scores whwn grouped based on gender

ce between test scores in Statistics when grouped based on Gender.

 1. Statement of Hypothesis
General : NO Significance

OLDER ADULTS YOUNGER ADULTS Ho: There is NO significant differe

54 44 Ha: There is significant difference
45 33
60 28
59 31 2. Determine the test to be used:
36 37
48 48 T-Test Compares means of 2 variable
55 34
56 28 T-TEST for Independent Samples
60 36
67 40 3. State level of significance
mean scores 54.00 35.90 lpha= .05

4. Obtain P value

0.000 P-Value

5. Decision

p < lpha

6. Conclusion

There is significant difference between the p

of Hypothesis
Significance

There is NO significant difference between the younger and older adults on perceived life satisfaction
There is significant difference between the younger and older adults on perceived life satisfaction

the test to be used:

Compares means of 2 variables

dependent Samples

of significance

ficant difference between the perceived level of satisfaction of oder and younger adults.
 1. Statement of Hypothesis
General : NO Significance

Wb Wa Ho: There is NO significance difference

60 58 Ha: There is significance difference bet
75 68
52 53
75 75 2. Determine the test to be used:
62 54
70 67 T-Test Compares means of 2 variables
65 62
80 70 T-TEST for Paired Samples
54 56
56 50 3. State level of significance
60 55 = .05
62 57
4. Obtain P value

0.004 P-Value

MEAN SCORES 64.25 60.42 5. Decision

p < lpha

6. Conclusion

There is significant difference between the w

 ent of Hypothesis
NO Significance

There is NO significance difference between the weight before and after the program.
There is significance difference between the weight before and after the program.

mine the test to be used:

Compares means of 2 variables

r Paired Samples

evel of significance

ignificant difference between the weight before and weight after the program.
 1. Statement of Hypothesis
General : NO Significance

WATER ALCOHOL Ho: Alcohol has NO significant effect o

18 14 Ha: Alcohol has significant effect on th
15 14
11 10 2. Determine the test to be used:
22 18
19 17 T-Test - Compares means of 2 variables
14 11 T-TEST for PAIRED Samples
13 10
15 15 3. State level of significance
14 11 = .05
16 16
4. Obtain P value

0.002 P-Value

5. Decision

MEAN SCORES 15.70 13.60 p < lpha

6. Conclusion

Alcohol has significant effect to the perceptua

 ent of Hypothesis
NO Significance

Alcohol has NO significant effect on the perceptual motor ability of the samples.
Alcohol has significant effect on the perceptual motor ability of the samples.

mine the test to be used:

Compares means of 2 variables

r PAIRED Samples

evel of significance

as significant effect to the perceptual motor ability.