Revised Laws of Mauritius

COURTS ACT
Cap 168 (Act 41 of 1945) – 7 March 1945

ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

SECTION
PART I – PRELIMINARY 24. Shorthand notes
1. Short title 25. – 30. —
2. Interpretation 31. Interpreters
PART II – THE SUPREME COURT 32. Other officers of Court
Sub-Part I – Constitution of 33. Officers under control of Chief
Supreme Court Justice
3. Constitution Sub-Part IV – Sittings and
4. — Distribution of Business of
Supreme Court
5. Vacancies
34. Civil jurisdiction of Supreme Court
6. —
35. Proceedings to be before one
7. Powers, precedence and office of Judge
Judges
36. Quorum of 2 or more Judges
8. Seal
37. Difference of opinion between 2
9. Sittings Judges
10. Place of sittings 38. Criminal business of Supreme Court
11. Adjournment of Court 39. Case before 3 or 5 Judges
12. Right of audience 40. Criminal and civil sittings
13 Supreme Court open at all times 41. —
14 Language to be used in Supreme 42. Trial by jury
Court
43. Penalty for non-attendance by
Sub-Part II – Jurisdiction of jury
Supreme Court
44. Drawing of jurors to serve
15. Powers of Supreme Court
45. Where number of jurors is insuffi-
16. Supreme Court – a Court of Equity cient
17. Jurisdiction and process 46. Challenge of jurors
17A. Mediation 47. Oath by jurors
18. Disciplinary powers 48. Foreman to be elected by jury
18A. Innocent publication and distribu- 49. Giving the accused in charge
tion
50. Presiding Judge to sum up case
18B. Proceedings in private
51. Verdict
18C. Powers of Supreme Court in cases
of contempt 52. Verdict to be given by a majority
Sub-Part III – Officers of Supreme 53. Sentence to be pronounced by
Court Court
19. Master and Registrar 54. Communication by or with juror
20. Deputy to Master and Registrar 55. Bribes offered to or accepted by
juror
21. Taxation by Chief Clerk
56. Law of England to decide proce-
22. Delegation of other powers of dure
Master and Registrar
23. Minutes of proceedings

C54 – 1 [Issue 3]
 Courts Act

SECTION
57. Jurors to know English 81. President and Magistrates of In-
58. Illness of accused termediate Court
59. Absence of a juror 82. Sittings of Intermediate Court
60. When jury to be kept together 83. Seal of Intermediate Court
61. Jurors to attend adjournments 84. Audience before Intermediate
Court
62. Bankruptcy Division of Supreme
Court 85. Proceedings before Intermediate
Court
63. Judge of Bankruptcy Division
86. Cases coming for mention
64. Custody of records
87. Documents
65. Registrar of Bankruptcy Division
88. Minutes of trials
66. Registrar may tax costs
89. Head Clerk
67. Power to make rules
90. Issue of process and other docu-
68. Attendance of Ministère Public ments
68A. Reference to Ministère Public op- 91. Custody of records
tional
92. Other duties of Head Clerk
Sub-Part V – Appellate Jurisdic-
tion of Supreme Court 93. Establishment of District Courts
69. Appellate jurisdiction of Supreme 94. District Magistrates
Court 95. Sittings of District Court
70. Appeals to be heard before at 96. Seal of District Court
least 2 Judges 96A. Audience before District Court
70A. Appeals to Judicial Committee in 97. Jurisdiction of District Magis-
criminal matters trates
70B. Frivolous appeals 98. District Clerk
Sub-Part VI – Jurisdiction in 99. Issue of process and other docu-
Chambers of Judges ments
71. Matters disposed of by Judge in 100. Custody of records
Chambers
101. Other duties of District Clerk
72. —
102. Change of venue
73. Power to grant an injunction
103. Errors as to venue
74. Rule or summons to show cause
Sub-Part II – Jurisdiction of In-
75. Record of Judge’s orders made in termediate and District Courts
Chambers
104. Civil jurisdiction
76. Judges may issue warrant or
summons 104A. Small claims jurisdiction
76A. Time for appeal 105. When jurisdiction not ousted
Sub-Part VII — 106. Action by landlord
77. – 79. — 107. Alimony
PART III – INTERMEDIATE 108. Possessory actions
COURT AND DISTRICT COURTS 109. Powers of Magistrate under
Sub-Part I – Constitution of Codes
Intermediate Court and District 110. Security for costs
Court 111. Jurisdiction taken away in certain
80. Establishment of Intermediate cases
Court

[Issue 3] C54 – 2
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

SECTION
112. Criminal jurisdiction of Intermedi- PART V – EVIDENCE
ate Court Sub-Part I – General Provisions
113. Penalties as to Evidence
114. Criminal jurisdiction of District 161. Interpretation
Courts 161A. Persons may be excluded from
115. Preliminary inquiry by Magistrate proceedings
116. Matters excluded from summary 161B. Live video and television link
jurisdiction 161C. Summons to judicial officer
117. Referral of cases by DPP 162. English law of evidence to be
118. Further powers of District Magis- followed
trates 163. No exclusion because of relation-
Sub-Part III – Miscellaneous ship or interest
119. Qualifications of Magistrates 164. Saving as to accused person and
120. Disqualification from holding spouse
other office 165. Questions tending to incriminate
121. Control of Magistrates 166. Proof of occupation of immovable
122. Control of Intermediate and property
District Courts 167. Examination on faits et articles
123. Reports to Chief Justice 168. Insufficiency of notices not to
124. Replacement of Magistrates exclude evidence
125. Challenge 169. State need not file list of
witnesses
126. Reservation of questions of law
170. Copies of public documents
127. Contempt admissible
128. Summonses to witnesses 171. Custodians of public documents
129. Examination of witnesses 172. Privilege not affected
130. Evidence outside Court 173. Statements of witnesses
131. Language to be used 174. De bene esse proceedings
132. Interpreters 175. Translation of evidence
133. Absence of Magistrate 176. Translation where not necessary
134. — in civil cases
135. Error and certiorari taken away 177. Recording evidence given before
136. Transfer of proceedings Supreme Court
137. – 154. — 177A. Objection to form of evidence
PART IV – LAW IN FORCE AND 178. Inspection of property
TO BE APPLIED IN COURTS 179. Penalty for non-attendance of
155. – 156. — witness
157. Extension of enactments to other 180. —
islands 181. Certificates of certain officers as
158. Power to legislate for other evidence
islands 181A. Microfilms and other reproductions
159. Penalties for contravention of 181B. Admissibility of out-of-court
regulations statements
160. Regulations to be laid before 181C. Admissibility of certain records in
Assembly civil proceedings

C54 – 3 [Issue 4]
 Courts Act

SECTION
181D. Evidence in rebuttal 191. Form of declaration
181E Admissibility of statements 192. Solemn affirmation
produced by computers in civil 193. Validity of oath, affirmation or
proceedings declaration
181F. Proof of statements contained in 194. Form of declaration in writing
a document
195. Penalty for swearing false affidavit
182. Illness of juror
196. Swearing with uplifted hands
183. This Sub-Part extended to other
islands PART VI – MISCELLANEOUS
Sub-Part II – Evidence in Criminal 197. Reasons of judgment in criminal
Cases matters
184. Competency of witnesses in 197A. Interest of judgment debts in
criminal cases accident cases
185. Evidence of person charged 197B. Costs in exaggerated claims
186. Right of reply 197C. Enquiry as to genuineness of deed
187. Evidence of husband and wife 197D. Wasted costs order
188. Application 197E. Adjournment costs
188A. Admissibility of sound recording 197F. Vexatious proceedings
188B. Admissibility of written 198. Rules of Court
statements 199. Rules Committee
188C. Admissibility of out of Court 200. Amendment of Schedules
statement in piracy cases where 201. Practice directions
maker is unavailable
FIRST SCHEDULE
189. Translation where not necessary
in criminal cases SECOND SCHEDULE
189A. Evidence of formal character THIRD SCHEDULE
Sub-Part III – Declarations FOURTH SCHEDULE
instead of Oath FIFTH SCHEDULE
190. Declaration instead of oath

COURTS ACT
PART I – PRELIMINARY
1. Short title
This Act may be cited as the Courts Act.

2. Interpretation
In this Act—
“District Magistrate” includes Senior District Magistrate;
“prescribed amount”, in relation to the Intermediate Court or a District
Court, means such sum as the President may, by regulations, determine.
[S. 2 amended by s. 23 (2) of Act 48 of 1991 w.e.f. 12 March 1992.]

[Issue 4] C54 – 4
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

PART II – THE SUPREME COURT

Sub-Part I – Constitution of Supreme Court
3. Constitution
(1) The Supreme Court of Mauritius shall be constituted in the manner
prescribed in Chapter VII of the Constitution.
(2) (a) Subject to paragraph (b), the retiring age of a Judge of the Su-
preme Court shall, for the purposes of section 78 (7) of the Constitution, be
the age of 67 years.
(b) Any person holding office as a Judge on 24 July 2008 may elect
to retire at the age of 62 years.
[S. 3 amended by s. 3 of Act 21 of 2008 w.e.f. 24 July 2008.]

4. —

5. Vacancies
The Supreme Court shall be deemed to be duly constituted during and
notwithstanding any vacancy caused by the death, resignation, sickness,
incapacity or absence from Mauritius on vacation leave, or for any other rea-
son, of the Chief Justice, the Senior Puisne Judge or any Puisne Judge.

6. —

7. Powers, precedence and office of Judges

(1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, all Judges of the Supreme
Court shall have equal power, authority and jurisdiction.
(2) The Puisne Judges shall take precedence after the Chief Justice and
the Senior Puisne Judge, in such manner as the President, acting in accor-
dance with the advice of the Judicial and Legal Service Commission, may
determine.
(3) Except with the approval of the President, no Judge shall, with or
without remuneration, undertake any other work or hold any other office.
[S. 7 amended by Act 48 of 1991.]

8. Seal
(1) The Supreme Court shall have a seal bearing on it the Arms of Mauri-
tius with the words “Supreme Court, Mauritius”.
(2) (a) The seal shall be kept by the Chief Justice.
(b) The Chief Justice may entrust the seal to such officers of the
Court as he thinks fit.
[S. 8 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

9. Sittings
Sittings of the Supreme Court may be appointed and held at any time at
the discretion of the Court.

C54 – 5 [Issue 2]
 Courts Act

10. Place of sittings

The sittings of the Supreme Court shall usually be held in such building as
the President shall assign as a Court House for that purpose, but where the
Supreme Court sits in any other building or place for the transaction of legal
business, the proceedings shall be as valid in every respect as if they had
been held in such Court House.
[S. 10 amended by Act 48 of 1991.]

11. Adjournment of Court

Where the Judge before whom any case is to be heard is for any cause
unable or fails to attend on the day appointed, and no other Judge attends in
his stead, the Master may adjourn the Court de die in diem until the Judge
attends or until the Court is adjourned or closed by order under the hand of a
Judge.
12. Right of audience
In any proceedings before the Supreme Court, any of the following per-
sons may address the Court—
(a) any party to the proceedings, with leave of the Court;
(b) a barrister, and, if the proceedings are before the Bankruptcy
Division, an attorney retained by or on behalf of any party.

13. Supreme Court open at all times

(1) Subject to section 15, the Supreme Court shall be open throughout
the year for the transaction of the general legal business pending there, and
may at any time hear and determine any cause or matter pending in Court,
upon such notice to the parties and otherwise as shall be determined by
Rules of Court or as shall seem just and reasonable.
(2) The offices of the Supreme Court shall remain open for public busi-
ness during office hours throughout the vacation and the vacation shall only
apply to the officers of the Supreme Court in so far as is provided by Rules
of Court.
[S. 13 amended by s. 2 (a) of Act 11 of 2007 w.e.f. 21 July 2007.]

14. Language to be used in Supreme Court

(1) The official language to be used in the Supreme Court of Mauritius
shall be English.
(2) Where a person appearing before the Court satisfies the Court that he
does not possess a competent knowledge of the English language, he may
give his evidence or make any statement in the language with which he is
best acquainted.
Sub-Part II – Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
15. Powers of Supreme Court
The Supreme Court shall be a superior Court of record and, in addition to
any other jurisdiction conferred on it, shall have all the powers and judicial
jurisdiction necessary to administer the laws of Mauritius.

[Issue 2] C54 – 6
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

16. Supreme Court – a Court of Equity

The Supreme Court shall be a Court of Equity vested with power, author-
ity and jurisdiction to administer justice, and to do all acts for the due execu-
tion of such equitable jurisdiction, in all cases where no legal remedy is pro-
vided by any enactment.

17. Jurisdiction and process

The Supreme Court shall have full original jurisdiction to hear, conduct and
pass decisions in civil suits, actions, causes, and any matters that may be
brought and may be pending before the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court
and the Judges shall sit and proceed to and conduct, and carry on, business in
the same manner as the High Court of Justice in England and its Judges.

17A. Mediation
(1) The Supreme Court shall have the power and jurisdiction to conduct
mediation in any civil suit, action, cause and matter that may be brought and
may be pending before the Supreme Court.
(2) The Chief Justice may, before or at any stage of any proceedings,
refer any civil suit, action, cause or matter to a Judge for mediation with a
view to disposing of that civil suit, action, cause or matter by agreement or
narrowing down the issues therein.
(3) Where a civil suit, action, cause or matter is referred for mediation
under subsection (2)—
(a) the Judge to whom it is referred shall have such powers as may
be prescribed for conducting mediation; and
(b) the parties shall submit themselves to mediation and shall
endeavour to dispose of the civil suit, action, cause or matter.
(4) Where a civil suit, action, cause or matter has not been disposed of
through mediation, the Judge shall cause the case to be fixed for trial.
[S. 17A inserted by s. 6 (a) of Act 20 of 2009 w.e.f. 19 December 2009.]

18. Disciplinary powers

(1) Notwithstanding any other enactment, the Supreme Court shall have
power and jurisdiction to hear and determine any complaint of a disciplinary
nature in respect of the professional conduct of a law practitioner or a minis-
terial officer including a land surveyor.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), “complaint” includes a motion by
a law officer, a written report by or on behalf of the Chief Justice, of the
Master and Registrar, of the Bar Council or of any other body or authority
exercising powers of supervision over the conduct of a person referred to in
subsection (1).
(3) The Court may require the Ministère Public to intervene in any such
matter in such manner as it thinks fit.

C54 – 7 [Issue 3]
 Courts Act

(4) A hearing under this section shall be governed by section 14 of the

Law Practitioners Act.
[S. 18 amended by Act 29 of 1992 w.e.f. 25 July 1992.]

18A. Innocent publication and distribution

(1) A person shall not commit a contempt of Court on the ground that he
has published any matter calculated to interfere with the course of justice in
connection with any proceedings pending or imminent at the time of publica-
tion if at that time, having taken reasonable care, he did not know and had
no reason to suspect that the proceedings were pending, or that such pro-
ceedings were imminent, as the case may be.
(2) A person shall not commit a contempt of Court on the ground that he
had distributed a publication containing such matter as is mentioned in sub-
section (1) if at the time of distribution, having taken all reasonable care, he
did not know that it contained any such matter and had no reason to suspect
that it was likely to do so.
(3) The proof of any fact tending to establish a defence afforded by this
section to any person in proceedings for contempt of Court shall lie upon
that person.

18B. Proceedings in private

(1) The publication of information relating to proceedings before any
Court sitting in private shall not of itself be contempt of Court except—
(a) where the proceedings relate to the guardianship, custody, mainte-
nance or upbringing of an infant, or rights of access to an infant;
(b) where the Court sits in private for reasons of national security
during that part of the proceedings about which the information
in question is published;
(c) where the information relates to a secret process, discovery or
invention which is in issue in the proceedings;
(d) where the Court, having power to do so, expressly prohibits the
publication of all information relating to the proceedings or of in-
formation of the description which is published.
(2) Without prejudice to subsection (1), the publication of the text of a
summary of the whole or part of an order made by a Court sitting in private
shall not of itself be contempt of Court except where the Court, having
power to do so, expressly prohibits the publication.
(3) In this section, references to a Court include references to a Judge
and to a tribunal and to any person exercising the functions of a Court, a
Judge or a tribunal, and references to a Court sitting in private include refer-
ences to a Court sitting in camera or in Chambers.
(4) Nothing in this section shall be construed as implying that any publi-
cation is punishable as contempt of Court which would not be so punishable
apart from this section.

[Issue 3] C54 – 8
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

18C. Powers of Supreme Court in cases of contempt

Where the Supreme Court, on a motion made to that effect supported by
affidavit, finds that a person has committed a contempt, the Court may—
(a) sentence that person to imprisonment for a term not exceeding
one year or to a fine not exceeding 300,000 rupees;
(b) make such other order as it thinks fit.
[S. 18C inserted by s. 4 of Act 15 of 1994 w.e.f. 1 July 1994.]

Sub-Part III – Officers of Supreme Court

19. Master and Registrar
(1) There shall be a Master and Registrar of the Supreme Court who shall
be a barrister of not less than 5 years’ standing at the Bar.

continued on page C54 – 9

C54 – 8 (1) [Issue 3]

 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(2) The duties of the Master shall include—

(a) the conduct and hearing of all formal matters relating to cases,
other than criminal matters, pending before the Supreme Court
including the power to hold pre-trial conferences and the power
to make orders or give directions for the just, expeditious and
economical disposal of proceedings;
(b) the taxation of costs, the conduct and management of judicial
sales, probate of wills and incidental matters connected there-
with;
(c) the dealing with matters of audit, inquiry and accounts; and
(d) all such matters as may be referred to him by the Chief Justice,
Judge or Court.
[S. 19 amended by Act 15 of 2000.]

20. Deputy to Master and Registrar

Subject to such directions as may be given by the Chief Justice, the Dep-
uty Master and Registrar and Judge in Bankruptcy shall have and exercise all
the powers, and perform all duties, vested in the Judge in Bankruptcy and
Master and Registrar under any enactment.
[S. 20 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

21. Taxation by Chief Clerk

(1) The Chief Justice may, in the case of the absence of the Master and
Registrar, make an order directing and authorising the Chief Clerk of the Reg-
istry to tax costs during the absence of the Master and Registrar.
(2) The Chief Clerk of the Registry shall have, during the absence of the
Master and Registrar, the same power of taxing costs as is vested in the
Master and Registrar by this Act, and any taxation of costs by the Chief
Clerk shall be deemed a taxation by the Master and Registrar.
[S. 21 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

22. Delegation of other powers of Master and Registrar

Notwithstanding any other enactment, the Secretary to the Chief Justice
or the Chief Registrar or any officer of the Court designated for that purpose
by the Chief Justice may—
(a) administer an oath; and
(b) exercise such powers or perform such duties of an administra-
tive nature vested in the Master and Registrar as the Chief Jus-
tice may determine.
[S. 22 amended by Act 29 of 1992; Act 15 of 1994; Act 4 of 1999.]

23. Minutes of proceedings

(1) In every case, civil or criminal, tried before the Supreme Court, or any
division of it, minutes of proceedings shall be drawn up and shall be signed

C54 – 9 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

by the Master and Registrar, or by any other officer of the Court acting on
behalf of the Master and Registrar with the authority of the Chief Justice.
(2) These minutes, with the notes of evidence taken at the hearing or
trial, as required by section 177, shall be preserved as records of the Court.
(3) The minutes and notes of evidence, or a copy thereof purporting to
be signed and certified as a true copy by the Master and Registrar, or such
other officer, shall at all times, without further proof, be admitted as evi-
dence of such proceedings and of the statement made by the witnesses.
[S. 23 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

24. Shorthand notes

In every case, civil or criminal, where the presiding Judge so directs, the
Master and Registrar or such other officer shall ensure that shorthand notes
are taken of any proceedings before the Supreme Court, and a transcript of
such notes shall be made if the presiding Judge so directs, and such tran-
script shall, for all purposes, be deemed prima facie to be the official record
of such proceedings.
[S. 24 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

25. – 30. —

31. Interpreters
(1) All interpreters appointed by the Public Service Commission shall be
deemed to be clerks attached to the Supreme Court.
(2) They shall be subject, as officers of the Court, to the control of the
Chief Justice and they shall perform such duties, including clerical duties as
the Chief Justice may direct.

32. Other officers of Court

(1) (a) The Supreme Court shall have such other officers as may be ap-
pointed by the Public Service Commission.
(b) The Chief Justice may transfer any clerk or interpreter of the Su-
preme Court to any Intermediate Court, District Court or Industrial Court, and
any clerk or interpreter so transferred shall have the same powers and be
subject to the same liabilities as an Intermediate Court, District Court or In-
dustrial Court clerk or as an Intermediate Court, District Court or Industrial
Court interpreter, as the case may be.
(2) (a) The Public Service Commission may appoint such number of per-
sons as may be necessary to be shorthand writers of the Supreme Court.
(b) They shall be deemed to be clerks attached to the Court and
shall perform such duties, including clerical duties, as the Chief Justice may
direct.

[Issue 1] C54 – 10
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

33. Officers under control of Chief Justice

Without prejudice to the powers of the Public Service Commission, every
officer of the Supreme Court, including clerks, shall, for all purposes, be sub-
ject to the orders and directions of the Chief Justice.

Sub-Part IV – Sittings and Distribution of Business of Supreme Court

34. Civil jurisdiction of Supreme Court

(1) The Supreme Court shall be the principal Court of original civil juris-
diction and shall exercise general powers of supervision over all District and
Industrial Courts and other special Courts established or which may be estab-
lished in Mauritius.
(2) In the exercise of civil jurisdiction, the Supreme Court may hear and de-
termine all civil matters whether sitting as a Court of Appeal or in exercise of
its original jurisdiction, and it may sit publicly in more than one division at the
same time for the despatch of civil business, each such division may be com-
posed of one or more Judges as the nature of the suit or matter may require.

35. Proceedings to be before one Judge

Every proceeding in the Supreme Court and all business arising from that
proceeding shall, save as provided by this Act, be heard and disposed of by
a single Judge.

36. Quorum of 2 or more Judges

The Chief Justice may, either proprio motu or on application in writing
made to him by any party to a case stating the reasons for such application,
direct that any case shall be heard by 2 or more Judges, having regard to the
magnitude of the interests at stake or the importance or intricacy of the
questions of fact or law involved.

37. Difference of opinion between 2 Judges

(1) Where the Supreme Court or any divisional Court is held by 2 Judges
only, the unanimous decision of these Judges shall be taken to be the deci-
sion of the Supreme Court.
(2) In the event of any difference of opinion between them, the decision
of the Court shall be suspended until a third Judge is present, and the
unanimous decision or the decision of the majority of the 3 Judges, shall be
taken to be the decision of the Supreme Court.

38. Criminal business of Supreme Court

(1) The Supreme Court shall be the principal Court of original criminal ju-
risdiction and shall exercise general powers of supervision over all Intermedi-
ate, District and Industrial Courts and any other special Courts that are or
may be established in Mauritius.

C54 – 11 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

(2) The Supreme Court shall, acting in the exercise of its original criminal
jurisdiction, hold sittings for the despatch of criminal business.
[S. 38 amended by s. 2 (b) of Act 11 of 2007.]

39. Case before 3 or 5 Judges

In any case pending before the Supreme Court, which the law requires to
be taken before the full Court, 3 or 5 Judges shall hear the case, and in such
case, as well as in any case where the Judges think it expedient to hold a
sitting before 3 or 5 of them, the unanimous decision of such 3 or 5 Judges
or the decision of a majority of them, shall be taken to be the decision of the
full Court.
40. Criminal and civil sittings
The Supreme Court may hold—
(a) 2 or more sittings at the same time for the despatch of criminal
business; and
(b) sittings for the despatch, at the same time, of criminal business
and civil business.
[S. 40 repealed and replaced by s. 2 (c) of Act 11 of 2007.]

41. —
[S. 41 repealed by s. 2 (d) of Act 11 of 2007.]

42. Trial by jury

(1) Subject to section 10 of the Criminal Procedure Act and to any other
enactment relating to trials without a jury, criminal trials before the Supreme
Court shall be held before a presiding Judge and a jury consisting of 9 per-
sons who are qualified to serve as jurors.
(2) Subject to subsection (3) and to section 57, every citizen of Mauritius
who—
(a) has at any time resided in the Island of Mauritius for one year;
and
(b) is between the ages of 21 and 65,
shall be qualified to serve as a juror.
(3) (a) No person who has been convicted of a crime shall be qualified to
act as a juror.
(b) No proceeding shall be open to objection or challenge on the
ground that a person disqualified under paragraph (a) has acted as a juror.
(4) The Judges shall, by rules of Court, make provision for the prepara-
tion of a list of jurors and for the summoning of panels.
(5) (a) A Judge may, on the trial of any cause before him, excuse a per-
son summoned as a juror from serving on the jury if he is satisfied that the
person—
(i) is not qualified to act as a juror;

[Issue 1] C54 – 12
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(ii) is not sufficiently conversant with the English language to act as

a juror;
(iii) ought to be excused from acting as a juror on account of any
serious physical incapacity or any mental deficiency; or
(iv) being a woman, ought to be excused from so serving for any
medical reason or any other reason which the Judge may con-
sider to be just and reasonable, having regard to the conditions
of her family life.
(b) Where a person is excused from serving on a jury pursuant to
paragraph (a), the name of the person shall be erased from the jury book for
the current year and any longer time which the Judge may think proper.
[S. 42 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

43. Penalty for non-attendance by jury

Any person who, when duly summoned as a juror, makes default and fails
to attend Court, or when called, does not answer or wilfully withdraws him-
self from the presence of the Court before the jury, of which he is one, has
delivered its verdict or been discharged, shall forfeit a sum not exceeding
500 rupees, at the direction of the Judge, unless some just cause for such
defaulter’s absence shall be made to appear to the satisfaction of the Court.
44. Drawing of jurors to serve
(1) At the sitting of the Court for the trial of any such issue, the name,
condition and place of abode of each juror summoned as aforesaid shall be
written on a separate piece of card, paper, parchment, or otherwise and put
into a box.
(2) When such issue is called on to be tried, the Registrar or other officer
of the Court shall, in open Court, draw therefrom, until the names of 9 per-
sons appear who are not objected to or challenged, and after the trial, such
names shall be returned to the box, to be kept with the other undrawn
names, and so on as long as any issue shall remain to be tried.
[S. 44 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

45. Where number of jurors is insufficient

Where a case appointed to be tried by a jury is called, and a sufficient
number of jurors summoned to attend such Court is not in attendance, the
Court or Judge may then order any officer of the Court forthwith to summon
as many good and lawful persons of the bystanders (being qualified as ju-
rors), or any such jurors residing in Port Louis, as shall be sufficient to make
up a full jury for the trial of that case.
46. Challenge of jurors
The State and the prisoner shall each be able to challenge—
(a) not more than 7 persons peremptorily; and
(b) any other person on good cause shown.
[S. 46 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

C54 – 13 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

47. Oath by jurors

Every juror shall take the following oath which shall be administered to
him by the presiding Judge—
“I shall well and truly try the matter at issue between the State and
the prisoner at the bar and a true verdict give according to the evi-
dence. So help me God.”
[S. 47 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

48. Foreman to be elected by jury

After the oaths have been administered, the jury shall elect their foreman.

49. Giving the accused in charge

The jury having been sworn to give a true verdict according to the evi-
dence upon the issues to be tried by them, and having elected a foreman,
the proper officer of the Court shall inform them of the charge specified in
the information, and of their duty as jurors upon the trial.

50. Presiding Judge to sum up case

The evidence and arguments at the trial on both sides being closed, the
presiding Judge shall, in the presence of the parties, sum up the whole case
to the jury, stating where the main question and principal issue lies, com-
menting on the evidence, and affording such explanations and making such
remarks as he thinks necessary for their direction, further stating his opinion
on any matter of law arising on the evidence which he may consider to re-
quire it.

51. Verdict
(1) The verdict of the jury shall be in ordinary cases “Guilty” or “Not
Guilty”.
(2) The jury may, if they so desire in any particular case, return instead a
special verdict, setting out the facts which they find to have existed in the
case before them, with an alternative conclusion of “Guilty” or “Not Guilty”
according as the Court may determine the matter of law arising from the
facts so found.
[S. 51 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

52. Verdict to be given by a majority

(1) The verdict of the jury shall be given by a majority of 7.
(2) The verdict shall be delivered in open Court and shall be recorded by
the Master and Registrar or other officer of the Court.
[S. 52 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

[Issue 1] C54 – 14
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

53. Sentence to be pronounced by Court

After the Master and Registrar or other officer has recorded the verdict in
criminal matters, the Court shall pronounce sentence on the prisoner either
forthwith or on some future day.
[S. 53 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

54. Communication by or with juror

(1) Any juror who is guilty of any extraneous communication pending the
conference of the jury, shall be fined by the Court in a sum not exceeding
500 rupees.
(2) The same penalty shall apply to any person guilty of having, from
outside, held any communication with any juror and to the officer in charge
of the jury who has not prevented such communication.

55. Bribes offered to or accepted by juror

Every person who is guilty of the offence of attempting corruptly to influ-
ence a juror by persuasion or by bribery or by offer of bribery, and every ju-
ror who wilfully and corruptly consents thereto, shall be respectively pun-
ished by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years, either in a summary
manner by the Supreme Court, where the commission of the offence is dis-
covered whilst a trial is pending before the Court, or by the Supreme Court
on a criminal information filed by the Director of Public Prosecutions against
the offender where the commission of the offence is not discovered whilst a
trial was pending before the Court.
[S. 55 amended by s. 2 (e) of Act 11 of 2007.]

56. Law of England to decide procedure

Where any question arises as to any procedure, or conduct in or respect-
ing any matter, in the trial by jury, not herein provided for, the law of Eng-
land shall be followed and rule the point or question at issue.

57. Jurors to know English

(1) No person who has made an oath or affirmation that he is not suffi-
ciently acquainted with the English language to serve as a juror shall be
called upon to act as a juror in any criminal case, nor shall the name of that
person be inserted by the Master and Registrar in the Jury Book compiled by
him, so long as such person continues not to be sufficiently conversant with
the English language to serve as a juror.
(2) A Judge in Chambers may, ex officio, direct the Master and Registrar
to re-insert, and it shall also be competent for the Master and Registrar, ex
officio to re-insert, in the Jury List of any year, the name of any person un-
der subsection (1), who, there is reason to believe, has become sufficiently
conversant with the English language to serve as a juror.
[S. 57 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

C54 – 15 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

58. Illness of accused

Where during a trial the accused, in the opinion of the Court becomes in-
capable, through sickness or other sufficient cause, of remaining at the bar,
the Court may discharge the jury and adjourn the trial.

59. Absence of a juror

(1) Where in the course of a trial, at any time prior to the delivery of the
verdict, any juror for any sufficient cause is prevented from attending
through the trial, or from further attendance at the time, or where any juror
absents himself, and his further attendance cannot be immediately enforced,
the Court may postpone the trial till the juror can attend, within a reasonable
time.
(2) Where the attendance of such juror cannot be procured within a rea-
sonable time, the Court may direct that a juror shall be added, and the jury
re-sworn, or that the jury shall be discharged and a new jury empanelled, and
in either case the trial shall commence anew.

60. When jury to be kept together

(1) It shall not be necessary in any case to keep the jury together during
any adjournment previous to the close of the Judge’s summing up, but the
Court may, if it appears to it to be advisable in the interests of justice in any
trial, require the jury to be kept together during any adjournment.
(2) Where the jury has retired to consider its verdict, the Court may give
such direction as it thinks fit with respect to their accommodation, custody
and refreshment.

61. Jurors to attend adjournments

Where a trial is adjourned, the jurors shall be required to attend at the ad-
journment sitting and at every subsequent sitting until the conclusion of the
trial.

62. Bankruptcy Division of Supreme Court

(1) There shall be a division of the Supreme Court to be called the Bank-
ruptcy Division of the Supreme Court having jurisdiction to deal with all mat-
ters of bankruptcy, insolvency or the winding up of companies.
(2) The jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Division of the Supreme Court shall
vest in and be exercised by the Master and Registrar concurrently with the
Judges.
(3) The jurisdiction of the Master and Registrar when sitting as a Judge
of the Bankruptcy Division shall not extend to the trial of criminal offences
against the law of bankruptcy, insolvency or the winding up of companies.
(4) The Master and Registrar when acting in the Bankruptcy Division shall
have all the powers and privileges of the Judges.

[Issue 1] C54 – 16
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(5) Several sittings of the Bankruptcy Division may be held concurrently

for the despatch of business.
[S. 62 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

63. Judge of Bankruptcy Division

(1) Where in any enactment dealing with bankruptcy and insolvency, the
expressions “Master”, “Court”, “Judge” or “Judge in Bankruptcy” are used,
they shall mean the Registrar sitting as a Judge of the Bankruptcy Division of
the Supreme Court, or a Judge exercising jurisdiction in the Bankruptcy Divi-
sion of the Supreme Court, and any jurisdiction exercisable under any such
enactment by the Registrar in Chambers shall be exercised by a Judge in
Chambers.
(2) Where in any enactment dealing with bankruptcy or insolvency the
words “Bankruptcy Court” or “Court” are used, they shall mean the Bank-
ruptcy Division of the Supreme Court.

64. Custody of records

All records and other documents in matters relating to insolvency, bank-
ruptcy and winding up of companies shall be kept in the Registry.

65. Registrar of Bankruptcy Division

The Chief Clerk, and such other clerk of the Registry as the Chief Justice
may appoint, shall act as Registrar of the Bankruptcy Division, and all war-
rants, orders or proceedings issued by that Division shall be under the seal of
the Supreme Court and under the hand of the officer so acting as Registrar.
[S. 65 amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

66. Registrar may tax costs

The powers as Registrar of the Bankruptcy Division, of the Chief Clerk or
of any other clerk or clerks of the Registry, shall include that of taxing costs
and of doing any other act, or issuing any order appertaining to the function
of Registrar in Bankruptcy, or which it would be the duty of the Registrar to
do or to issue in his capacity of Registrar.

67. Power to make rules

The Judges may make rules regulating the procedure in insolvency, bank-
ruptcy and winding up and specifying the fees and costs to be taken and
allowed in Court and at Chambers, and for the distribution of business in the
Bankruptcy Division.

68. Attendance of Ministère Public

Where the Court or any Judge certifies by writing that the attendance in
Court of any law officer, as representing the Ministère Public, is essential to
the proper administration of justice in any case—
(a) where the State or the public revenue is concerned;

C54 – 17 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

(b) where the civil status of any person, or the guardianship of any
minor or interdicted person is concerned,
the Attorney-General or any other law officer duly authorised by him may
appear as a party to the case and give his conclusions thereon.
[S. 68 amended by Act 48 of 1991.]

68A. Reference to Ministère Public optional

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in article 83 of the Code de

Procédure Civile, it shall no longer be necessary for the Supreme Court, or a
Judge, before giving judgment or making an order in any cause or matter
mentioned in that article to refer such cause or matter to the Ministère Public
for conclusions, but in any such cause or matter, the Supreme Court or a
Judge may request the Ministère Public to give conclusions.

Sub-Part V – Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

69. Appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court

(1) Subject to any other enactment, the Supreme Court shall have full
power and jurisdiction to hear and determine all appeals, whether civil or
criminal, made to the Court from—

(a) a Judge in the exercise of his original jurisdiction;

(b) —

(c) the Bankruptcy Division;

(d) the Registrar;

(e) the Intermediate Court;

(f) the Industrial Court;

(g) a Magistrate;

(h) any other Court or body established under any other enactment.

(2) An appeal to the Supreme Court under any of the enactments set out
in the First Schedule shall be dealt with in the same manner as an appeal
from a Magistrate pursuant to the District and Intermediate Courts (Civil Ju-
risdiction) Act, but the appellant shall not be required to furnish security.

(3) (a) Every appellant shall, not less than 45 days before the date of the
hearing of the appeal, serve on the other parties to the appeal and lodge in
the Registry, in such form and manner as may be prescribed by rules of
Court, skeleton arguments and submissions on the grounds of appeal.

[Issue 1] C54 – 18
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(b) Every other party to an appeal shall, not less than 30 days before
the date of the hearing of the appeal, serve on the other parties to the appeal
and lodge in the Registry, in such form and manner as may be prescribed by
Rules of Court, skeleton arguments and submissions on the grounds of
appeal.
(c) Where any appellant or party to an appeal does not comply with
any of the provisions of paragraph (a) or (b), the Court may make—
(i) such order as to costs as it thinks fit; or
(ii) a wasted costs order.
(4) (a) Where, pursuant to any enactment, a person may appeal to the
Supreme Court against a decision of a Court or body specified in subsec-
tion (1), the notice of appeal shall contain a warning to the party on whom it
is served to the effect that he shall, if he wishes to resist the appeal, comply
with paragraph (b).
(b) Every person who is served with a notice of appeal and who
wishes to resist the appeal shall, not later than 2 months after the date of
service, serve on the appellant and file in the Registry a notice of his inten-
tion so to do.
(c) Any person on whom notice of appeal is served and who fails to
comply with paragraph (b) shall be deemed to have elected not to resist the
appeal.
[S. 69 amended by Act 29 of 1992; Act 15 of 1994; Act 15 of 2000.]

70. Appeals to be heard before at least 2 Judges

Save as otherwise expressly provided in any other enactment, appeals to
the Supreme Court shall be heard before at least 2 Judges.

70A. Appeals to Judicial Committee in criminal matters

An appeal shall lie from final decisions of the Court of Appeal or of the
Supreme Court to the Judicial Committee in criminal cases where, in the
opinion of the Court, the question involved in the appeal is one that, by rea-
son of its great general public importance or otherwise, ought to be submit-
ted to the Judicial Committee.
[S. 70A amended by Act 29 of 1990; Act 48 of 1991.]

70B. Frivolous appeals

Notwithstanding any other enactment, where an appeal is made to the
Supreme Court in a civil case and the Court is satisfied that the appeal is
frivolous or is an abuse of its process, it may order that interest on the
judgment debt be paid at 15 per cent or such other rate as may be pre-
scribed by Rules of Court made by the Judges.
[S. 70B amended by Act 15 of 1994.]

C54 – 19 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

Sub-Part VI – Jurisdiction in Chambers of Judges

71. Matters disposed of by Judge in Chambers
(1) Subject to subsection (2), applications for or concerned with or in re-
spect to any matter specified in this section and any matter connected
therewith may, subject to the discretion of the Judge in any particular case
to refer them to the Court, be finally disposed of at Chambers by a Judge’s
order, which order shall be a sufficient authority to the Registrar to issue
thereon a rule of Court de plano—
(a) applications to be let into possession of the unadministered prop-
erty and rights of a party deceased or absent (“envoi en
possession”);
(b) applications for affirmative declaration;
(c) applications for cancellation or reduction of mortgage inscription;
(d) applications for removal of seizures;
(e) applications for the validity or nullity of attachments;
(f) applications for partitions of property;
(g) —
(h) applications for admission of a relinquishment of immovable
property;
(i) applications touching absent persons under article 115 of the
Code Civil Mauricien;
(j) —
(k) applications for homologations of compromises (“transactions”)
under article 441 of the Code Civil Mauricien;
(l) applications for nomination of surveyors, appraisers, skilled wit-
nesses (“experts”).
(2) In applications under subsection (1) (c), (d), (e) or (f), no order shall
be made by a Judge in Chambers, where a party to the application objects.

72. —

73. Power to grant an injunction

A Judge may, whether in term time or in vacation, grant an injunction
subject to a motion to the Court to set aside the injunction, and the Court
may then set aside or modify it.

74. Rule or summons to show cause

Where a party seeks to obtain a rule or summons to show cause, he shall
apply to the Master and Registrar who may issue the rule or summons and
make it returnable before the Judge in Chambers.
[S. 74 amended by Act 29 of 1992; Act 20 of 1993.]

[Issue 1] C54 – 20
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

75. Record of Judge’s orders made in Chambers

(1) (a) The date and nature of every order made by a Judge in Chambers
shall be recorded in a book kept for that purpose at the Judge’s Chambers.

(b) The orders shall be exempted from registration in the office of

the Registrar-General.

(2) The order may be written on unstamped paper.

[S. 75 amended by Act 3 of 1985.]

76. Judges may issue warrant or summons

A Judge may issue a summons or warrant of arrest in the case of any of-
fence committed within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and in such
case the Judge shall order the offender to appear or to be taken before the
nearest Magistrate.

76A. Time for appeal

(1) Any person who wishes to appeal to the Supreme Court against any
order, decision or judgment of a Judge at Chambers in any matter in which
an appeal lies shall, unless otherwise expressly provided, lodge his appeal in
the Registry and serve notice of the appeal on the other party or parties to
the case within 21 days from the date of the order, decision or judgment.

(2) Section 69 (4) shall apply to an appeal under subsection (1).

[S. 76A amended by Act 29 of 1992; Act 15 of 1994.]

Sub-Part VII —

77. – 79. —

PART III – INTERMEDIATE COURT AND DISTRICT COURTS

Sub-Part I – Constitution of Intermediate Court and District Courts

80. Establishment of Intermediate Court

(1) There shall be an Intermediate Court which shall be a Court of record

and which shall have civil and criminal jurisdiction in all districts in such
cases and matters and to such extent as are provided in this Part.

(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the civil jurisdiction of the Inter-
mediate Court shall extend to Rodrigues.
[S. 80 amended by Act 4 of 1999.]

C54 – 21 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

81. President and Magistrates of Intermediate Court

(1) The Intermediate Court shall consist of a President, to be known as
the President of the Intermediate Court, and such number of Magistrates as
may be established under the Civil Establishment Act, to be known as Magis-
trates of the Intermediate Court.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), a temporary Magistrate of the Inter-
mediate Court may be appointed when and as often as, in the opinion of the
Chief Justice, his appointment is required.
(3) The Chief Justice may direct that any civil case lodged before the In-
termediate Court be tried in Rodrigues.
(4) For the purposes of subsection (3), the Chief Justice may—
(a) direct one or more Magistrates to try the case;
(b) designate a clerk who shall have the same powers and duties in
relation to the case as those of the Head Clerk of the Intermedi-
ate Court.
(5) Any Magistrate to whom a direction is given under subsection (4)
shall have the same powers and jurisdiction as those conferred on a Magis-
trate of the Intermediate Court.
[S. 81 amended by Act 4 of 1999.]

82. Sittings of Intermediate Court

(1) The Intermediate Court shall hold its sittings at such place, on such
days and at such time as the Chief Justice may direct.
(2) Where the Intermediate Court adjourns any proceedings before the
Court, it may resume them at such place or time as it may determine.

83. Seal of Intermediate Court

The Intermediate Court shall have a seal and all warrants, summonses and
other process required to be under seal and issuing out of the Court shall be
sealed with the seal.

84. Audience before Intermediate Court

In any proceeding before the Intermediate Court, any of the following per-
sons may address the Court—
(a) any party to the proceedings with the leave of the Court;
(b) a person who is authorised to do so pursuant to the Law Practi-
tioners Act.
[S. 84 amended by Act 46 of 1988.]

85. Proceedings before Intermediate Court

(1) Subject to subsections (2) and (5), the hearing of every case before
the Intermediate Court shall take place before one Magistrate.

[Issue 1] C54 – 22
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(2) The President of the Intermediate Court may, either proprio motu or
on application in writing made to him by any party to a case stating the rea-
sons for such application, direct that any case shall be heard by 2 or more
Magistrates, having regard to the magnitude of the interests at stake or the
importance or intricacy of the questions of fact or law involved.
(3) Except where the case is heard before one Magistrate, the decision of
the Intermediate Court shall—
(a) where the Court is composed of 2 Magistrates, be the unani-
mous decision of the Magistrates;
(b) where the Court is composed of 3 Magistrates, be the unanimous
decision or the decision of the majority of the Magistrates.
(4) Where the Intermediate Court is composed of 2 Magistrates and there
is a difference of opinion between them, the trial shall be started anew be-
fore 3 Magistrates.
(5) Where a person is prosecuted for an offence of rape under sec-
tion 249 (1) of the Criminal Code, the case shall be heard—
(a) by 2 Magistrates; or
(b) where the President of the Intermediate Court so directs, by
more than 2 Magistrates.
[S. 85 amended by Act 4 of 1999; s. 2 (a) of Act 30 of 2003.]

86. Cases coming for mention

(1) Where a case before the Intermediate Court comes for mention, or
has, for any reason, to be adjourned, the proceedings may take place before
one Magistrate, who may take and record the plea of an accused party or
the pleadings of a party in a civil suit.
(2) Where a criminal case is adjourned under subsection (1), the Magis-
trate adjourning the case may remand any accused party or may take or
enlarge bail for his appearance.
(3) Where in a civil matter the plaintiff or the defendant or both of them
do not appear, one Magistrate may exercise any of the powers specified in
section 15 or 16, as the case may be, of the District and Intermediate Courts
(Civil Jurisdiction) Act.
[S. 86 amended by Act 46 of 1988; Act 4 of 1999.]

87. Documents
Any information, warrant, summons or other process required to be laid
before, issued or authenticated by, the Intermediate Court may be laid be-
fore, issued or authenticated by, any Magistrate of the Intermediate Court.

88. Minutes of trials

(1) Subject to subsection (3), the minutes of evidence and the proceed-
ings in any criminal trial shall be recorded by any Magistrate of the Interme-
diate Court and it shall not be necessary that the minutes be recorded
throughout by the same Magistrate.

C54 – 23 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

(2) The minute of every unanimous judgment shall be signed by all the
Magistrates and, if the judgment is not unanimous, each Magistrate shall
sign the minute of his judgment.
(3) The evidence and proceedings in any criminal or civil case before the
Intermediate Court may be recorded by tape or other technological means.
[S. 88 amended by Act 28 of 1999.]

89. Head Clerk

The senior officer attached to the Intermediate Court shall be known as
the Head Clerk but any other officer attached to the Court shall have the
same powers as the Head Clerk and may perform any act which the law re-
quires the Head Clerk to perform.

90. Issue of process and other documents

(1) The Head Clerk shall issue all warrants, summonses or any other
process and shall register all orders and judgments.
(2) The Head Clerk shall keep such books for such purposes as the Chief
Justice may direct.

91. Custody of records

(1) The Head Clerk shall have the custody of all records of the Intermedi-
ate Court.
(2) The Head Clerk shall cause notice of all claims, informations, war-
rants and summonses and of all orders, judgments and executions and of all
proceedings to be entered in a book which shall be kept at the Intermediate
Court.
(3) Any entry in a book kept under subsection (1), or a copy of the entry
purporting to be signed and certified as a true copy by the Head Clerk, shall
in any proceedings in any Court be admitted, without further proof as evi-
dence of the entry and of the proceedings to which it refers and of the regu-
larity of such proceedings.

92. Other duties of Head Clerk

The Head Clerk shall have such other duties as may be assigned to him.

93. Establishment of District Courts

(1) There shall be a Court in every district to be known as a District
Court, which shall be a Court of record and which shall have civil and crimi-
nal jurisdiction in such causes and matters and to such extent as are pro-
vided in this Part.
(2) The Chief Justice may, by regulations, declare that any District Court
shall sit in 2 or more divisions and may determine the name by which every
division shall be known.

[Issue 1] C54 – 24
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(3) The Chief Justice may, by Order, direct that a District Court shall
have jurisdiction in respect of any part of another district.
[S. 93 amended by Act 20 of 1993.]

94. District Magistrates

A District Court shall be presided by a Magistrate to be known as a Dis-
trict Magistrate.

95. Sittings of District Court

A District Court shall hold its sittings at such place, on such days and at
such times as the Chief Justice may direct.

96. Seal of District Court

A District Court shall have a seal and every warrant, summons, or other
process required to be under seal and issuing out of the Court shall be sealed
with the seal.
96A. Audience before District Court
In any proceedings before a District Court, any of the following persons
may address the Court—
(a) any party to the proceedings with the leave of the Court;
(b) any person who is authorised to do so pursuant to the Law Prac-
titioners Act.
[S. 96A amended by Act 4 of 1999.]

97. Jurisdiction of District Magistrates

(1) Every District Magistrate shall have jurisdiction in every district, but
the Chief Justice may direct that a District Magistrate shall have special
charge of a District Court or, as the case may be, of any of its divisions.
(2) The Chief Justice may assign the Island of Rodrigues or any other is-
land forming part of the State of Mauritius to any Magistrate who shall have
and exercise therein the same rights, duties, powers and jurisdiction as a
District Magistrate in the Island of Mauritius and shall, in addition, perform
such administrative or other duties as may, with the consent of the Chief
Justice, be assigned to him.
(3) Any assignment or direction under this section shall be signified in
writing to the Magistrate by the Master and Registrar.
(4) For the purposes of this section, Round Island, Flat Island and Gabriel
Island shall be deemed to be part of the district of Rivière du Rempart.
[S. 97 amended by Act 20 of 1993.]

98. District Clerk

The senior officer attached to a District Court shall be known as a District
Clerk but any other officer attached to that Court shall have the same pow-
ers as the District Clerk and may perform any act which the law requires the
District Clerk to perform.

C54 – 25 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

99. Issue of process and other documents

(1) The District Clerk shall issue all warrants, summonses or any other
process and shall register all orders and judgments.
(2) The District Clerk shall keep such books for such purposes as the
Chief Justice may direct.

100. Custody of records

(1) The District Clerk shall have the custody of all records of the District
Court to which he is attached.
(2) The District Clerk shall cause notice of all claims, informations, war-
rants and summonses and of all orders, judgments and executions and of all
other proceedings, to be entered in a book which shall be kept at the District
Court.
(3) Any entry in a book kept under subsection (1), or a copy of it purport-
ing to be signed and certified as a true copy by the District Clerk, shall, in
any proceedings before any Court, be admitted, without further proof, as
evidence of the entry and of the proceedings to which it refers and of the
regularity of such proceedings.

101. Other duties of District Clerk

A District Clerk shall have such other duties as may be assigned to him.

102. Change of venue

(1) (a) Any Judge may, upon the application by or on behalf of the Di-
rector of Public Prosecutions, any District Magistrate or any private party to
any cause or matter, civil or criminal, pending before a District Court, order,
if he is satisfied that the interests of justice so require, that the venue of the
cause or matter be transferred from that District Court to any other District
Court.
(b) No change of venue shall be authorised if the trial of any cause
or matter has begun on the merits.
(2) Any Judge’s order under subsection (1) shall be subject to such con-
ditions as the Judge thinks fit to impose and shall be final and conclusive.
(3) Any District Magistrate shall, on receiving notice of a Judge’s order
under subsection (1), stay all proceedings in relation to the cause or matter
referred to in the order and shall forward the original warrants, informations,
plaints, summonses, process or other documents before him to the District
Court to which the cause or matter has been transferred.
(4) The warrants, informations, plaints, summonses, process or docu-
ments forwarded to a District Court under subsection (3) shall be deemed to
have been issued, received or entered in the District Court to which they
have been forwarded.

[Issue 1] C54 – 26
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

103. Errors as to venue

No act done by or under the authority of a District Magistrate shall be
void or impeachable by reason that the act was done in respect of or in rela-
tion to any offence, cause or matter which occurred or arose beyond the lim-
its of the district to which he has been assigned.
[S. 103 amended by Act 20 of 1993.]

Sub-Part II – Jurisdiction of Intermediate and District Courts

104. Civil jurisdiction

(1) Subject to this Part, the Intermediate Court or a District Court shall
have jurisdiction in all civil cases where the sum or matter in dispute,
whether in balance of account or otherwise, does not exceed the prescribed
amount, exclusive of interest and costs.
(2) The jurisdiction conferred upon the Intermediate Court or a District
Court by subsection (1) shall include the power to make such orders and to
issue such warrants or other process as may be necessary for the enforce-
ment of the rights of the parties and no order made or warrant or process
issued under this subsection shall be deemed invalid by reason only that it is
in the nature of a mandatory injunction or other equitable remedy.
(3) Orders in the nature of an injunction and all orders within the compe-
tence of the Intermediate Court or a District Court, as the case may be,
which, if they were made in an action or matter in the Supreme Court, could
in that Court be enforced by attachment or committal, may be enforced by
order of the Intermediate Court or District Court, as the case may be, by at-
tachment or committal.

104A. Small claims jurisdiction

Notwithstanding any other enactment, a District Court shall have jurisdic-
tion in any civil action, where the sum claimed or matter in dispute does not
exceed 25,000 rupees and the case has been lodged under Part IIA of the
District and Intermediate Courts (Civil Jurisdiction) Act, to hear and deter-
mine the action in accordance with the procedure set out under that Part.
[S. 104A inserted by Act 4 of 1999.]

105. When jurisdiction not ousted

(1) The jurisdiction of the Intermediate Court or a District Court shall not
be ousted if, in order to adjudicate upon a claim within its jurisdiction, it has
to decide upon a right to or contract concerning money or property exceed-
ing the prescribed amount.
(2) Where a claim is made to goods seized in execution of a judgment and
the value of the goods does not exceed the prescribed amount, the Intermedi-
ate Court or a District Court, as the case may be, shall have jurisdiction to

C54 – 27 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

entertain the claim even if the goods have been seized in execution of a
judgment of the Supreme Court, provided the claim is made within such pe-
riod and in such form as may be prescribed by Rules of Court.

106. Action by landlord

(1) The Intermediate Court or a District Court shall have jurisdiction in
any action by a landlord to obtain cancellation of a lease, with or without
damages, or to recover possession of real property from a tenant or occu-
pier, including an action where the value of the property exceeds the pre-
scribed amount.
(2) Where the yearly rent or rental value of the property does not exceed
the prescribed amount and the sum claimed for damages, if any, and for rent
do not together exceed the prescribed amount, the cancellation of any lease,
damages and possession of real property from a tenant or occupier may be
claimed in the same plaint in which rent is claimed.
(3) This section shall not affect the operation of the Landlord and Tenant
Act.
[S. 106 amended by Act 6 of 1999.]

107. Alimony
(1) A District Court shall have jurisdiction in actions for payment of ali-
mony by a wife against her husband, or in a case where the law gives a right
to an alimony.
(2) Notwithstanding any other enactment relating to the attachment of
salaries or pensions, a District Court may, in execution of its judgment under
this section, issue an attachment against any portion of any salary or pen-
sion of which the defendant may be in receipt.

108. Possessory actions

(1) A District Court shall have jurisdiction in possessory actions concern-
ing any land, premises, runs of water or other immovable property or any
other rights arising out of immovable property including actions where the
value of the property or right exceeds the prescribed amount if—
(a) the plaintiff claims to be maintained or restored to the quiet en-
joyment and possession of the property or rights;
(b) the possessory action is entered within one year from the im-
puted trespass; and
(c) the plaintiff has been in quite possession for at least one full
year before the imputed trespass.
(2) In any possessory action, damages not exceeding the prescribed
amount may also be claimed.
(3) Notwithstanding article 25 of the Code de Procédure Civile, where
the value of the property or right in relation to which a possessory action is
brought does not exceed the prescribed amount, the District Court may, if
the issue of ownership is raised, adjudicate on it.

[Issue 1] C54 – 28
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

109. Powers of Magistrate under Codes

A District Magistrate shall have all the powers vested by the Code Civil
Mauricien and the Code de Procédure Civile in all matters relating to the
apposition and removal of seals.

110. Security for costs

Any Court may, on the application of the defendant, in any cause or mat-
ter, require the plaintiff to give security for costs in all cases in which under
the Code Civil Mauricien security may be required or where the plaintiff is
known to be insolvent.

111. Jurisdiction taken away in certain cases

(1) The Intermediate Court or a District Court shall have no jurisdiction in
any action or suit for divorce, judicial separation, interdiction of persons, or
in matters of bankruptcy, or in any action where the civil status of any per-
son, or any right of an inheritance, or any right arising out of a contract of
marriage or the ownership or usufruct of immovable property or servitude
thereon of a value exceeding the prescribed amount is in question, or where
the validity of any will or other testamentary instrument, or any donatio inter
vivos is disputed.
(2) The Intermediate Court shall have no jurisdiction in actions for pay-
ment of alimony or possessory actions.

112. Criminal jurisdiction of Intermediate Court

The Intermediate Court shall have jurisdiction to try any of the following
criminal matters which the Director of Public Prosecutions may refer to it—
(a) any offence which a District Magistrate has jurisdiction to try;
(b) any offence triable in Rodrigues or any island under the jurisdic-
tion of the State of Mauritius other than the Island of Mauritius;
(c) any offence specified in section 117;
(d) any offence under sections 104, 122, 123 (2), 228 (3) and (4),
235, 239 (1), 249 (1), (4) and (5), 251, 257, 283, 284, 291
and 346 of the Criminal Code;
(e) any offence under the Forests and Reserves Act;
(f) any offence declared triable by the Intermediate Court under any
other enactment.
[S. 112 amended by Act 26 of 1991.]

113. Penalties
(1) Subject to subsection (2), the Intermediate Court shall have jurisdic-
tion to inflict the penalties and forfeitures specified in the law applicable to
the offence charged.

C54 – 29 [Issue 4]
 Courts Act

(2) (a) Subject to paragraph (b) and any other enactment, the Court shall
not award against any person penal servitude for more than 15 years or
imprisonment for more than 10 years.
(b) In the case of a persistent offender, if the Court is satisfied that,
by reason of his previous conduct and of the likelihood of his committing
further offences, it is expedient to protect the public from him for a substan-
tial period, the Court may increase the sentence to 20 years penal servitude.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)—
(a) “persistent offender” means any person who—
(i) commits any offence before the expiration of 3 years from
his previous conviction or from his final release from prison
after serving a sentence passed on such conviction, which-
ever is the latter; or
(ii) has been convicted on at least 3 previous occasions since
he has attained the age of 21 and has, on those 3 previous
occasions, received sentences the total length of which
was not less than 10 years;
(b) a certificate purporting to be signed by the Commissioner of Pris-
ons regarding the date of final release from prison of an offender
shall be sufficient evidence of the facts therein stated without
proof of his handwriting.
[S. 113 amended by Act 5 of 1985; Act 29 of 1992, s. 2 (a) of Act 36 of 2008
w.e.f. 6 December 2008.]

114. Criminal jurisdiction of District Courts

(1) Subject to subsection (2), every District Court before whom any person
is charged with having committed an offence, not being one of the offences
mentioned in section 116, shall have power and jurisdiction to hear, try and
determine the charge and all questions of fact and law arising in the case and
to convict the person, and on conviction, to award against him any penalties
not exceeding the maximum penalties applicable to the offence of which the
person is convicted.
(2) A District Court shall not award against any person imprisonment
with or without hard labour for more than 5 years, and a fine exceeding
100,000 rupees.
[S. 114 replaced by Act 7 of 1986; amended by Act 5 of 1999, s. 2 (b) of Act 36 of 2008
w.e.f. 6 December 2008.]

115. Preliminary inquiry by Magistrate

Where upon the hearing of an offence within his jurisdiction, the Magistrate
is of opinion that the offence deserves a punishment which is beyond his juris-
diction or that the evidence discloses another offence which is not within his
jurisdiction, the Magistrate may refer the matter to the Director of Public
Prosecutions who, in accordance with section 3 (1A) of the Criminal Procedure
Act, may, at his discretion, decide whether or not a preliminary inquiry shall be
held before the person is made to stand trial before the appropriate Court.
[S. 115 amended by s. 2 (a) of Act 18 of 2011 w.e.f. 9 July 2011.]

[Issue 4] C54 – 30
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

116. Matters excluded from summary jurisdiction

A District Magistrate shall have no jurisdiction to convict, but shall pro-
ceed to hold a preliminary inquiry and, if necessary, to commit for trial in ac-
cordance with the law relating to preliminary inquiries and commitment for
trial if an accused is charged with any of the following offences—
(a) offences under sections 50 to 79, 82, 83, 86, 88 to 91,
100 (1), 101, 102, 104, 122 to 124, 215 to 223, 228 (3) and
(4), 234, 235, 236 (1) and (2), 239 (1), 249 (1) and (4), 251,
257, 259, 276 to 281 (where the offence is committed before
the Supreme Court), 283, 284, 291, 346 and 347 of the Crimi-
nal Code;
(b) attempts at or complicity in offences excepted from the jurisdic-
tion of the Magistrate;
(c) offences which, under any other enactment, are punishable by
death or penal servitude for life, or are excluded from the juris-
diction of the Magistrate.

117. Referral of cases by DPP

Notwithstanding section 116, where a person is charged with any of the
offences provided for by sections 77, 79, 124 and 214 of the Criminal Code,
the Director of Public Prosecutions may, either before or after commitment
of the accused, authorise the Magistrate to entertain the case and to pro-
ceed to adjudication thereon, and thereupon the Magistrate may try, acquit
or convict the person charged with the offence.

118. Further powers of District Magistrates

(1) A District Magistrate may, and may be required to, even in a district
which has not been assigned to him—
(a) issue a warrant to apprehend a party charged, or a search
warrant;
(b) take bail for the appearance of a party arrested before the proper
Court;
(c) take and receive any dying declaration;
(d) take and receive the deposition of a witness in the presence of a
party charged with any offence specified in section 116;
(e) order the performance of a post-mortem examination, and, for
the purpose of such examination, order the body of a person
which has already been interred to be disinterred.
(2) Any act done under subsection (1) shall be as valid as if it has been
done by a Magistrate to whom the district in which the act is done has been
assigned.
(3) Nothing in this section shall authorise a Magistrate to hear a case or
to make an inquiry in any district which has not been assigned to him.

C54 – 31 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

Sub-Part III – Miscellaneous

119. Qualifications of Magistrates

No person shall be eligible for appointment to the office of Magistrate
unless he is a barrister admitted to practise and has at least 2 years’ stand-
ing at the bar.
[S. 119 amended by Act 41 of 1991; Act 6 of 1993.]

120. Disqualification from holding other office

Except with the permission of the Chief Justice, no Magistrate shall, with
or without remuneration, hold any office other than that of Magistrate and
perform any duties other than those relating to his office.

121. Control of Magistrates

Every Magistrate shall, for administrative purposes, be subject to the di-
rection and control of the Chief Justice.

122. Control of Intermediate and District Courts

Subject to section 121, the Intermediate Court shall be under the control
and supervision of the President of the Intermediate Court and every District
Court shall be under the control and supervision of the District Magistrate to
whom the Chief Justice has assigned its special charge.

123. Reports to Chief Justice

The Chief Justice may, where he thinks fit so to do, require any Magis-
trate to furnish to him in such form as he may direct, a report on any case,
civil or criminal, brought before the Magistrate and may call for the record of
any such case.

124. Replacement of Magistrates

(1) Subject to the Constitution, where a Magistrate is, by reason of ill-
ness, challenge or for any other reason, incapable of acting, the Chief Jus-
tice may direct another Magistrate to replace him.
(2) In this section, “Magistrate” means a Magistrate of the Industrial or
Intermediate Court, a Senior District Magistrate or a District Magistrate.
[S. 124 amended by Act 46 of 1988; Act 29 of 1990.]

125. Challenge
(1) No challenge shall be allowed against a Magistrate save on the ground
of personal interest in any cause or matter brought before him or of his being
related to one of the parties in the suit by blood or marriage, either in the di-
rect line or in the collateral line to the degree of first cousin inclusively.

[Issue 1] C54 – 32
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(2) Any challenge against a Magistrate shall be deposited at the registry

of the Court where the Magistrate sits and the Magistrate against whom the
challenge is made shall either accept the challenge or set down in writing the
reasons for not abstaining from hearing the cause or matter.
(3) Where a Magistrate does not abstain from hearing a cause or matter
upon a challenge made against him, the reasons in answer to the challenge
as set down in writing under subsection (2) shall be transmitted to the Regis-
trar for submission to a Judge in Chambers.
(4) The Judge in Chambers shall determine the question of challenge
summarily, in the absence of the parties and, where the challenge is not ad-
mitted, may award costs not exceeding 50 rupees against the party having
made the challenge.
(5) Where a Magistrate considers that he should abstain from hearing a
cause or matter, he shall give notice of his reason to the Chief Justice who
shall adjudicate on it and make an order accordingly.

126. Reservation of questions of law

(1) Without prejudice to the right of appeal conferred by any enactment,
the Intermediate Court or any District Court may state a case for the opinion
of the Supreme Court on any question of law which may arise on the trial of
any civil suit or matter and may adjudicate on it subject to the opinion of the
Supreme Court.
(2) The Supreme Court may, after hearing the interested parties, deter-
mine any question of law on a case stated under subsection (1) for its
opinion.

127. Contempt
(1) Where any person wilfully insults a Magistrate, the usher or any offi-
cer of a Court during a sitting of, or while in attendance in, the Court or wil-
fully interrupts the proceedings of the Court or otherwise misbehaves in
Court, any usher or officer of the Court may, with or without assistance
from any person, by order of the Court, take the person into custody and
detain him until the sitting of the Court ends.
(2) The Court may commit any person referred to in subsection (1) to
prison for a period not exceeding 7 days or may impose upon him a fine not
exceeding 100 rupees and, in a default of payment, may commit him to
prison for a period not exceeding 7 days unless the fine is sooner paid.

128. Summonses to witnesses

(1) Any party to a civil or criminal case, inquiry or other proceeding may
obtain at the registry of the Intermediate Court or the District Court, as the
case may be, summonses to witnesses, with or without a clause requiring
the production of books, deeds, papers or writings in their possession, and in
any such summons any number of names may be inserted.

C54 – 33 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

(2) Any person on whom a summons is served and who refuses or ne-
glects, without sufficient cause, to appear or to produce any books, papers or
writings required by the summons to be produced, or any person who appears
in answer to a summons and who on being required to give evidence refuses
to be sworn or affirmed or to make a solemn declaration, as the case may be,
and to give evidence, shall be liable to a fine not exceeding 2,000 rupees to be
inflicted by the Court before whom the default or refusal occurs.

(3) Any person not appearing when duly served with a summons may, by
warrant under the hand of the Magistrate, be arrested and brought before
him to give evidence.

(4) (a) In the case of any prosecution entered by any public officer act-
ing in the discharge of his duties, any officer of the department to which the
officer belongs, whose attendance as a witness is required, may be served
by any other officer of the same department, duly authorised to that effect
by the head thereof, with a notice in writing to attend Court.
(b) The notice, duly signed or initialled by the witness, with the re-
turn of service duly entered thereon, shall be the equivalent, to all intents
and purposes, of a summons served by an usher.
[S. 128 amended by Act 20 of 1993; Act 4 of 1999.]

129. Examination of witnesses

Any witness heard in any proceeding before a Court shall be heard upon
oath, and may be examined, cross-examined and re-examined in accordance
with the law of evidence.
[S. 129 amended by Act 20 of 1993.]

130. Evidence outside Court

Where any person cannot appear before the Intermediate Court or a Dis-
trict Court through illness or other lawful impediment and it appears to the
Court that it is necessary in the interests of justice to do so, the Court may,
on giving adequate notice to interested parties, proceed to any place to ex-
amine that person upon his personal answers or to give his evidence upon
oath.

131. Language to be used

(1) The language to be used in the Intermediate Court or in any District

Court shall be English, but any person may address the Court in French.

(2) Where any person who is required to give evidence, satisfies the
Court that he does not possess a competent knowledge of English or French,
he may give his evidence in the language with which he is best acquainted.

(3) Where any person gives evidence in a language other than English or
French, the proceedings shall, if the Court so directs, be translated.

[Issue 1] C54 – 34
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

132. Interpreters
Any person appointed to act as interpreter at the Intermediate Court or
any District Court may, in addition to his duties as interpreter, be assigned
such other duties as the Magistrate having the supervision of the Court may
determine.

133. Absence of Magistrate

(1) Where the Intermediate Court or a District Court is unable to sit on
any day appointed and no Magistrate is in attendance, the Head Clerk of the
Intermediate Court or the District Clerk, as the case may be, may adjourn the
hearing of any case fixed for that day to any subsequent day and the order
shall, for all intents and purposes, be the equivalent of an order of adjourn-
ment by a Magistrate.
(2) Where a criminal case is adjourned under subsection (1), the order of
adjournment may provide for the remand of any accused party or for the tak-
ing or enlargement of bail for his appearance.

134. —
[S. 134 amended by s. 2 (b) of Act 18 of 2011 w.e.f. 9 July 2011; repealed by s. 11 (1) (a) of
Act 39 of 2011 w.e.f. 1 June 2012.]

135. Error and certiorari taken away

(1) Subject to subsection (2), no judgment, order, or determination, given
or made by any Court, nor any cause or matter brought or pending before
him, shall be removed by appeal, motion, writ of error, certiorari or otherwise
into any other Court, save and except in the manner and in accordance with
the law governing appeals.
(2) —
[S. 135 amended by s. 2 of Act 27 of 2006 w.e.f. 18 December 2006.]

136. Transfer of proceedings

(1) In any action commenced in the Supreme Court, the Court may at
any time, on application made in that behalf by any party by way of motion,
make an order that the claim and counterclaim, if any, or, if the only matter
remaining to be tried is the counterclaim, the counterclaim, be transferred to
any Court which has jurisdiction to hear and determine the subject matter of
the claim or counterclaim, as the case may be, and the amount thereof.
(2) Where an order is made under subsection (1), the costs of the pro-
ceedings before the Supreme Court, including the costs of the application for
the transfer, shall be in the discretion of the Supreme Court.
(3) The Court to which any claim or counterclaim has been transferred by
an order made under subsection (1) shall adjudicate upon the claim or counter-
claim as if the action had been commenced there and the provisions regulating
the procedure of that Court in civil matters shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to
any claim or counterclaim so transferred.

C54 – 35 [Issue 4]
 Courts Act

(4) (a) Where—

(i) the trial of an action which has been entered in the Intermediate
Court has not yet begun; and
(ii) the sum or matter in dispute, whether in balance of account or
otherwise, but exclusive of interest and costs, does not exceed
the prescribed amount in relation to District Courts,
the Intermediate Court may, with the written consent of the Chief Justice,
order that the action be removed to the appropriate District Court.
(b) Where an action is removed to a District Court under para-
graph (a), it shall be heard and determined by that Court as if it had been
originally entered there.

137. – 154. —

PART IV – LAW IN FORCE AND TO BE APPLIED IN COURTS

155. – 156. —

157. Extension of enactments to other islands

The President may extend any enactment to any island under the jurisdic-
tion of the State of Mauritius other than the Island of Mauritius, subject to
such modifications and restrictions as he thinks fit, in order to adapt the
enactment to the local circumstances of such island and may amend any
enactment in force in the island.
[S. 157 amended by Act 48 of 1991.]

158. Power to legislate for other islands

Without prejudice to section 157, the President may make such regula-
tions as he thinks necessary or desirable for the good government and general
well-being of the islands under the jurisdiction of the State of Mauritius and
all such regulations shall have the same force and effect as though they
were enactments passed by the Assembly.
[S. 158 amended by Act 48 of 1991.]

159. Penalties for contravention of regulations

Regulations made under section 158 may also provide penalties for their
non-observance not exceeding a penalty of 500 rupees and imprisonment for
a term not exceeding 3 months for any one offence, and for the infliction of
such penalties by a Magistrate or other person.

160. Regulations to be laid before Assembly

All regulations made under section 158 shall be laid before the Assembly.

[Issue 4] C54 – 36
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

PART V – EVIDENCE
Sub-Part I – General Provisions as to Evidence

161. Interpretation
In this Part—
“evidence” includes testimony upon oath or solemn affirmation given
viva voce or by affidavit in writing and unsworn personal answers of par-
ties to trials;
“sexual offence case” means a case in which the accused is being
prosecuted for rape, attempt upon chastity or illegal sexual intercourse in
breach of section 249 of the Criminal Code;
“trial” includes any inquiry, hearing or other proceeding in any Court or
before any person having by law or by consent of parties’ authority to
hear, receive or examine evidence.
[S. 161 amended by s. 2 (b) of Act 30 of 2003.]

161A. Persons may be excluded from proceedings

Any Judge, Magistrate or other person having by law authority to hear,
receive or examine evidence may, where he considers it necessary or expe-
dient—
(a) in circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of
justice or of public morality;
(b) in order to safeguard the welfare of persons under the age of 18;
(c) in order to protect the privacy of persons concerned in the pro-
ceedings;
(d) in the interests of defence, public safety or public order,
exclude from the proceedings (except the announcement of the decision) any
person other than the parties to the trial and their legal representatives.

161B. Live video and television link

(1) Notwithstanding any other enactment, the Court may, in its discretion
and on motion made by the prosecution, allow a complainant in a sexual
offence case or any witness in relation to an offence under the Piracy and
Maritime Violence Act to appear before it, and depone, through such live
video or live television link system as may be approved in writing by the
Chief Justice.
(2) In exercising its discretion under subsection (1), the Court shall ensure
that there is a fair hearing in the matter.
[S. 161B inserted by s. 2 (c) of Act 30 of 2003; s. 11 (1) (b) of Act 39 of 2011
w.e.f. 1 June 2012.]

C54 – 37 [Issue 4]
 Courts Act

161C. Summons to judicial officer

Notwithstanding any other enactment, no summons shall be issued calling
a judicial officer as a witness before any Court except by leave of a Judge in
Chambers and on satisfying the Judge that the judicial officer has some
material evidence to give in the matter.
[S. 161C, previously 161B, inserted by Act 20 of 1993; amended by s. 2 (c) of Act 30 of 2003.]

162. English law of evidence to be followed

Except where it is otherwise provided by special laws now in force in
Mauritius or hereafter to be enacted, the English law of evidence for the time
being shall prevail and be applied in all Courts of Mauritius.

163. No exclusion because of relationship or interest

No person shall, except as hereinafter provided, be excluded or excused
from giving evidence at any trial by reason of his being a party to or having
an interest in the event of such trial or by reason of his relationship by mar-
riage or otherwise to any party to, or person having an interest in the event
of, such trial.

164. Saving as to accused person and spouse

Nothing in this Part shall render any person charged with having commit-
ted an offence punishable by law, or the husband or wife of that person, a
competent witness at the trial of that person for such offence before any
Court of criminal jurisdiction, except in cases where the offence is charged
to have been committed against the person or property or conjugal rights of
the husband or wife of the accused, in which cases such husband or wife
shall be a competent and compellable witness.

165. Questions tending to incriminate

(1) Nothing in this Sub-Part shall render any person (other than a bank-
rupt examined before any Court or Judge under any law relating to bank-
ruptcy) compellable to answer any question the answer to which would tend

continued on page C54 – 39

[Issue 4] C54 – 38
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

to expose him to prosecution for an offence punishable by law, or shall ren-

der any person compellable to answer the question whether he has or has
not committed adultery.
(2) Where any person has stated voluntarily as a witness that he has or
has not committed adultery, he may be further examined or cross-examined
upon such statement.

166. Proof of occupation of immovable property

(1) (a) In any claim to rent or indemnity for the occupation of immovable
property, oral evidence shall, when a lease is denied and is not completely
established by writing, be admissible to prove or disprove the occupation and
the amount or payment of the indemnity, and the party suing shall be enti-
tled to the indemnity although it may result from the oral evidence given that
the occupation existed under a lease.
(b) Such a claim for indemnity shall be barred by one year’s
prescription.
(2) Nothing in this section shall alter any law by virtue of which the pos-
sessor of immovable property is entitled to retain the fruits of the property
and to make them his own.

167. Examination on faits et articles

Where a party to a suit is called upon to give his unsworn personal an-
swers, he may be examined as an adverse witness by a party calling him and
afterwards examined on his own behalf, but only as to matters arising out of
the examination made by the party calling him, and he may then be re-
examined touching any question put to him on his behalf.

168. Insufficiency of notices not to exclude evidence

(1) Where the State or any other party to a trial is required by any law or
rule of Court to file a list of witnesses or give a notice of facts, if at the trial
witnesses be tendered whose names have not been included in such list, or
who have not been sufficiently described therein, or if evidence is tendered
of a fact omitted from or not sufficiently set out in such notice of facts, or if
such list or notice has not been filed or given within the time fixed by law,
the Court shall not reject the proof of such facts or refuse the witnesses of-
fered merely on the ground that such notice of facts, list or description of
witnesses has not been served in time, where it is satisfied that there has
been no mala fides, but it may postpone the trial on such terms as to costs,
if any, as to the Court seems just.
(2) The State shall not be condemned in costs in any criminal trial.
[S. 168 amended by Act 48 of 1991.]

169. State need not file list of witnesses

It shall not be necessary for the State to file any list of witnesses to be
called in reply to witnesses for the defendant in any criminal trial, but where
the State calls any witnesses in reply, the Court may allow the defendant to
produce further evidence to rebut the witnesses heard in reply.
[S. 169 amended by Act 48 of 1991.]

C54 – 39 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

170. Copies of public documents admissible

(1) At any trial, the contents of any record, book, deed, map, plan or
other document in the official custody of the Supreme Court, of the Conser-
vator of Mortgages, of any Government department, of the Intermediate
Court, of any District Court, or of any notary may be proved by means of a
copy or extract certified under the hand of the Registrar, the Conservator of
Mortgages, the chief clerk or head of such department, the Head Clerk of the
Intermediate Court, the District Clerk, or such notary as the case may be, to
be a true copy or extract.
(2) The copy shall be admissible in evidence at any trial to the same extent
and in the same manner as the original would but for this Act be admissible.
(3) Certificates that such copies or extracts are true and purporting to be
signed by the Registrar or other person under subsection (1) shall, in the ab-
sence of proof to the contrary, be held to have been so signed.

171. Custodians of public documents

(1) (a) No person having the official custody of such original documents
as are mentioned in section 170 shall be subpoenaed or summoned to pro-
duce the documents, nor shall they be admissible in evidence at any trial ex-
cept upon the order of a Judge.
(b) Such order shall only be made where it appears to the Judge that
the authenticity of the document itself is in question, or that the proof
sought to be given cannot be given by means of a copy or extract, and that
the proof of the authenticity or the proof sought to be given is material to
the matter at issue, and in every such case the same fee shall, in addition to
the allowance to be paid for the attendance of the person so subpoenaed or
summoned, be charged for the production of such document as would have
been payable for a copy or extract.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), any record of any Court shall be ad-
missible in evidence in the Court to which its custody belongs to the same
extent and in the same manner as it would have been if this section had not
been enacted.

172. Privilege not affected

Nothing in this Sub-Part shall, except where there is an express provision
to the contrary, be held in any way to affect any right to refuse to produce
any document or to answer any question on the ground of privilege.

173. Statements of witnesses

(1) (a) Any witness may be cross-examined at any trial as to previous
statements made by him in writing or reduced into writing relative to the
subject matter of the trial, without the writing being shown to him, or read,
but if it is intended to contradict the witness by the writing, his attention
must, before such contradictory proof can be given, be called to those parts
of the writing which are to be used for the purpose of so contradicting him.

[Issue 1] C54 – 40
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(b) The Court may at any time during the trial require the production
of the writing to be used for the purposes of the trial in any way that to the
Court seems proper.
(2) (a) It shall be competent to examine any witness who may be called
in any judicial proceeding as to whether he has on any specified occasion
made a statement on any matter pertaining to the issue which is different
from the evidence given by him in that proceeding, and it shall be competent
in the course of such proceeding to adduce evidence to prove that the wit-
ness, whether he has shown himself hostile or not, has made a different
statement on the occasion specified.
(b) Nothing in paragraph (a) shall make any such statement of itself
evidence of the proof of any fact or facts embodied in it.

174. De bene esse proceedings

(1) Any party who intends to call a witness who on the day of the trial—
(a) will not be in Mauritius; or
(b) may not be alive or fit to give evidence because of his failing
health,
shall make an ex parte application of a de bene esse hearing of the witness
before the Judge in Chambers.
(2) Where an application under subsection (1) is granted, the Judge shall
direct that the order be served on all other parties to the proceedings.
(3) The de bene esse hearing shall take place on a date to be fixed by the
Judge in Chambers.
(4) The de bene esse proceedings shall form part of the record of the
main case and shall be admitted in evidence.
[S. 174 amended by Act 15 of 2000.]

175. Translation of evidence

Where in any proceedings before the Supreme Court, whether civil, crimi-
nal, or in bankruptcy or of any other nature, or before any other Court, a
witness or a party gives evidence in a language other than English, such evi-
dence shall, subject to sections 176 and 189, be translated into English and
shall be recorded and form part of the record.

176. Translation where not necessary in civil cases

Where in any proceedings before the Supreme Court on the civil side or
the Master and Registrar or the Judge in Bankruptcy, a witness speaks in a
language which is well known to both plaintiff and defendant as the case
may be, the Judges, the law officers of the State, the Master and Registrar
or the Judge in Bankruptcy and the Counsel engaged in the case, the exami-
nation of that witness may take place in that language and it shall not be

C54 – 41 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

necessary to translate the deposition or answers in English, except where

the depositions or answers are given in Creole, in which case they shall be
taken down by the Master and Registrar or other officer of the Court.
[S. 176 amended by Act 48 of 1991; Act 29 of 1992.]

177. Recording evidence given before Supreme Court

(1) (a) In any criminal case heard before the Supreme Court, and at
every stage thereof, the presiding Judge shall, save as hereinafter provided,
take down in writing the oral evidence given before the Court, and in every
civil case so heard the Master and Registrar or other officer of the Court per-
forming the duties of Master and Registrar in Court shall, if the presiding
Judge so directs, take down in writing, the oral evidence given before the
Court.
(b) Where the presiding Judge in a criminal case finds himself tem-
porarily incapacitated from taking down such evidence, he may direct that
such evidence be taken down by the Master and Registrar, or by the officer
performing the duties of Master and Registrar in Court or by any officer of
the Court or other person whom the presiding Judge considers competent,
reliable and suitable for the purpose.
(2) (a) Before the Master and Registrar, officer, or other person other
than the presiding Judge takes down in writing any oral evidence, an oath
shall be tendered to and taken by such Master and Registrar, officer or per-
son for the accurate and faithful recording of such oral evidence according to
the true purpose and meaning thereof, and such oath shall be in such terms
as seem apt and sufficient to the presiding Judge.
(b) Where the Master and Registrar or officer of the Court perform-
ing the duties of Master and Registrar in Court, has once duly taken such
oath, he shall not again be required to take such oath in respect of the same
or any subsequent case.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the evidence and proceedings in any
criminal or civil case before the Supreme Court may be recorded by tape or
other technological means and the Judge may give such directions with re-
gard to the recording of evidence and proceedings as he deems fit.
[S. 177 amended by Act 29 of 1992; Act 28 of 1999.]

177A. Objection to form of evidence

(1) Where under this Act or any other enactment, the evidence or pro-
ceedings are recorded by tape or other technological means—
(a) no objection shall be allowed or taken on the ground that there is
a defect in the recording of the evidence or the form of the evi-
dence recorded;
(b) any defect in the recording of the evidence shall not affect the
validity of the proceedings.

[Issue 1] C54 – 42
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(2) Where it appears to the trial Magistrate or trial Judge that there
exists—
(a) any defect in the evidence recorded by tape or other technologi-
cal means; or
(b) any variance between such evidence and any record kept by the
Magistrate or Judge,
the Judge or Magistrate may make such order as he considers appropriate in
respect of the recording of evidence or proceedings.
[S. 177A added by Act 28 of 1999.]

178. Inspection of property

In any cause or matter, the Court may, on the application of either party,
or on its own motion make such order for the inspection by the Court, the
jury, the parties or witnesses, of any movable or immovable property, the
inspection of which may be material to the proper determination of the ques-
tion in dispute and give such direction respecting the inspection as to the
Court seems fit.

179. Penalty for non-attendance of witness

(1) Without prejudice to section 128, any person summoned to attend as
a witness who, without lawful excuse, fails to attend as required by the
summons, or who, having attended, departs without having obtained the
permission of the Court, or fails to attend at any subsequent sitting, shall be
liable by order of the Court to a fine not exceeding 2,000 rupees.
(2) The fine shall be levied by attachment and sale of any movable prop-
erty belonging to the witness within the limits of the jurisdiction of the
Court.
(3) In default of recovery of the fine by attachment and sale, the witness
may, by order of the Court, be imprisoned for a term not exceeding 15 days
unless the fine is paid before the end of that term.
(4) For good cause shown, the Court may remit or reduce any fine im-
posed under this section.
[S. 179 amended by Act 4 of 1999.]

180. —

181. Certificates of certain officers as evidence

(1) (a) In subsection (2), “officer” means, subject to paragraph (b), a
public officer who is the holder of, or is acting in, an office as—
(i) Chief Government Analyst;
(ii) Government Analyst;
(iii) Medical and Health Officer;
(iv) Pathologist;

C54 – 43 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

(v) Police Medical Officer;

(vi) Principal Forensic Science Officer;
(vii) Principal Veterinary Officer;
(viii) Scientific Officer (Forensic Science);
(ix) Senior Forensic Laboratory Assistant;
(x) Senior Pathologist;
(xi) Senior Police Medical Officer;
(xii) Veterinary Officer;
(xiii) Police Officer; or
(xiv) Director, Pharmaceutical Services.
(b) Where an office specified in paragraph (a) is restyled, a public of-
ficer who is the holder of, or is acting in, the restyled office shall, for the
purposes of subsection (2), be an officer.
(2) In all proceedings before any Court or before any person authorised
by law or by consent of parties to hear, receive and examine evidence, a cer-
tificate under the hand—
(a) of any officer; or
(b)in the case of a medical certificate, of the officer in charge of
the hospital where the examination of the person to whom the
certificate relates was carried out,
shall be sufficient evidence of the fact therein stated without proof of the
handwriting of such officer unless the Court or such person authorised as
aforesaid decides that the attendance of the officer is necessary.
[S. 181 amended by Act 29 of 1992; Act 4 of 1999; Act 5 of 1999.]

181A. Microfilms and other reproductions

(1) Where the copy of a document which is admissible in evidence—
(a) purports to be a machine copy or a print made from a microfilm;
and
(b)
bears or is accompanied by a certificate signed by an authorised
person certifying that the copy is a reproduction of an original
document,
the copy shall be admissible in evidence in any legal proceedings.
(2) In subsection (1), “authorised person” means—
(a) a public or local government officer;
(b) an officer in the employment of a statutory body;
(c) an employee of a bank authorised by the Bank of Mauritius; and
(d) any other person authorised in writing by the Attorney-General.
181B. Admissibility of out-of-court statements
(1) A statement made, whether orally or in a document or otherwise, by
a person, whether called as a witness or not, shall, subject to subsection (2)

[Issue 1] C54 – 44
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

and to Rules of Court, be admissible in any civil proceedings as evidence of

any fact or opinion stated therein of which direct oral evidence by the wit-
ness would be admissible.
(2) Where a party wishing to put in a statement under subsection (1) has
called, or intends to call, as a witness in the proceedings, the person by whom
the statement was made, the statement shall not be given in evidence—
(a) without leave of the Court; and
(b) before the conclusion of the examination-in-chief of the person
by whom it was made except—
(i) where the Court allows evidence of the making of the state-
ment to be given on behalf of that party by some other
person; or
(ii) in so far as the Court allows the person by whom the state-
ment was made to narrate it in the course of his examina-
tion-in-chief on the ground that to prevent him from so doing
would adversely affect the intelligibility of this evidence.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), where a statement made otherwise than in
a document is admissible under subsection (1), no evidence other than direct
oral evidence by the person who made the statement, or any person who
heard or otherwise perceived it being made, shall be admissible for the pur-
pose of proving it.
(4) Where a statement is made by a person while giving oral evidence in
any other legal proceedings, the statement may be proved in such manner as
the Court thinks fit.
[S. 181B inserted by Act 18 of 1998; amended by s. 11 (1) (e) of Act 39 of 2011 w.e.f. 1
June 2011.]

181C. Admissibility of certain records in civil proceedings

(1) A statement contained in a document shall, subject to section 181E,
to subsection (2) and to Rules of Court, be admissible in any civil proceed-
ings as evidence of any fact or opinion stated therein of which direct oral
evidence would be admissible, where the document is, or forms part of, a
record compiled, by a person acting under a duty, from information which—
(a) was supplied by a person who had, or may reasonably be sup-
posed to have had, personal knowledge of the matters dealt with
in that information; or
(b) in case the information was not supplied directly by the person
referred to in paragraph (a) to the compiler of the record, was
supplied by him to the compiler of the record indirectly through
one or more intermediaries each acting under a duty.
(2) Where a party wishing to put in a statement under subsection (1) has
called, or intends to call, as a witness in the proceedings the person who
originally supplied the information from which the record containing the
statement was compiled, the statement shall not be given in evidence—
(a) without leave of the Court; and

C54 – 45 [Issue 4]
 Courts Act

(b) before the conclusion of the examination-in-chief of the person

who originally supplied the information.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), “person acting under a duty”
includes a person acting in the course of any trade, business, profession or
other occupation in which he is engaged or employed or for the purposes of
any paid or unpaid office held by him.
[S. 181C inserted by Act 18 of 1998 but incorrectly numbered 181B; amended by s. 11 (1) (c)
of Act 39 of 2011 w.e.f. 1 June 2012.]

181D. Evidence in rebuttal

(1) Where a statement is given in evidence under section 181B and the
person who made the statement is not called as a witness in the proceedings,
any evidence which if that person had been so called, could be admissible for
the purpose of impeaching or supporting his credibility shall, subject to Rules
of Court, be admissible for that purpose.
(2) Where a statement is given in evidence under section 181C, and the
person who originally supplied the information from which the record was
compiled is not called as a witness in the proceedings, any evidence which, if
that person had been called, could be admissible for the purpose of impeach-
ing or supporting his credibility shall, subject to Rules of Court, be admissible
for that purpose.
[S. 181D inserted by Act 18 of 1998.]

181E. Admissibility of statements produced by computers in civil proceedings

(1) In this section, “computer” means any device for storing and process-
ing information, whether or not the information is derived from other infor-
mation by calculation, comparison or otherwise.
(2) Where, over a period, the function of storing or processing informa-
tion for the purpose of carrying an activity was regularly performed by—
(a) a combination of computers;
(b) different computers operating in succession;
(c) different combinations of computers operating in succession;
(d) the successive operation of one or more computers and one or
more combinations of computers,
all the computers shall, for the purposes of this section, be treated as consti-
tuting a single computer.
(3) A statement contained in a document produced by a computer shall,
subject to Rules of Court, be admissible in any civil proceedings as evidence
of any fact stated therein of which direct oral evidence would be admissible
where—
(a) the document was produced during a period over which the
computer was regularly used to store or process information for
the purpose of any activity regularly carried on by a person over
this period;

[Issue 4] C54 – 46
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(b) information of the kind contained in the statement, or of the kind

from which the information is derived, was regularly supplied to
the computer over that period in the ordinary course of that
activity;
(c) the computer was operating properly during the material part of
that period; and
(d) the information contained in the statement reproduces or is de-
rived from information supplied to the computer in the ordinary
course of that activity.

(4) Where a party wishes to give in evidence a statement under subsec-

tion (3), a certificate which—
(a) identifies the document containing the statement and describes
the manner in which it was produced;
(b) gives particulars of any device involved in the production of the
document to show that it was produced by a computer;
(c) deals with any matter referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c) or (d)
of subsection (3); and
(d) purports to be signed by a person occupying a responsible posi-
tion in relation to the operation of the relevant device or to the
management of the relevant activity,
shall be evidence of any matter stated in the certificate.

(5) For the purposes of subsection (4), it shall be sufficient for a matter
to be stated to the best of the knowledge and belief of the person stating it.

181F. Proof of statements contained in a document

Where a statement contained in a document is to be given in evidence

under section 181B, 181C or 181E, it may be proved by the production of
that document or by the production of a copy thereof, or the material part
thereof, authenticated in such manner as the Court thinks fit.
[S. 181F inserted by Act 18 of 1998.]

182. Illness of juror

A certificate under the hand of any qualified medical practitioner shall be

received before the Supreme Court, in case of illness of any juror, witness,
or party to a suit, or any officer of the Court, as prima facie evidence, with-
out proof of the handwriting of such medical practitioner.

183. This Sub-Part extended to other islands

This Sub-Part shall, so far as it is applicable, extend to all trials in the

other islands under the jurisdiction of the State of Mauritius.

C54 – 47 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

Sub-Part II – Evidence in Criminal Cases

184. Competency of witnesses in criminal cases

(1) Subject to subsection (2), every person charged with an offence, and
the wife or husband, as the case may be, of the person so charged, shall be
a competent witness for the defence at every stage of the proceedings,
whether the person so charged is charged solely or jointly with any other
person.
(2) (a) A person so charged shall not be called as a witness in pursuance
of this Sub-Part except upon his own application.
(b) The failure of any person charged with an offence or of the wife
or husband, as the case may be, of the person so charged, to give evidence,
shall not be made the subject of any comment by the prosecution.
(c) The wife or husband of the person charged shall not, save as
provided in this Sub-Part, be called as a witness in pursuance of this Sub-
Part, except upon the application of the person so charged.
(d) Nothing in this Sub-Part shall make a husband compellable to
disclose any communication made to him by his wife during the marriage, or
a wife compellable to disclose any communication made to her by her hus-
band during the marriage.
(e) A person charged and being a witness in pursuance of this Sub-
Part may be asked any question in cross-examination, notwithstanding that it
would tend to criminate him as to the offence charged.
(f) A person charged and called as a witness in pursuance of this
Sub-Part shall not be asked, and if asked shall not be required to answer, any
question tending to show that he has committed, or been convicted of, or
been charged with, any offence other than that with which he is then
charged, or is of bad character, unless—
(i) the proof that he has committed or been convicted of such of-
fence is admissible evidence to show that he is guilty of the of-
fence with which he is then charged;
(ii) he has personally or by his advocate asked questions of the wit-
nesses for the prosecution with a view to establish his own good
character, or has given evidence of his own good character, or
the nature or conduct of the defence is such as to involve impu-
tations on the character of the prosecution or the witnesses for
the prosecution; or
(iii) he has given evidence against any other person charged with the
same offence.
(g) Every person called as a witness in pursuance of this Sub-Part
shall, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, give his evidence from the wit-
ness box or other place from which the other witnesses give their evidence.

[Issue 1] C54 – 48
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(h) Nothing in this Sub-Part shall affect section 51 of the District and
Intermediate Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act, or any right of the person
charged to make a statement without being sworn.

185. Evidence of person charged

Where the only witness to the facts of the case called by the defence is
the person charged, he shall be called as a witness immediately after the
close of the evidence for the prosecution.

186. Right of reply

In cases where the right of reply depends upon the question whether evi-
dence has been called for the defence, the fact that the person charged has
been called as a witness shall not of itself confer on the prosecution the right
of reply.

187. Evidence of husband and wife

(1) The wife or husband of a person charged with an offence against the
person, property or conjugal rights of such husband or wife, or against the
person or property of any child of either party to the marriage, may be called
as a witness either for the prosecution or defence and without the consent
of the person charged.
(2) Nothing in this Sub-Part shall affect a case where the wife or hus-
band of a person charged with an offence may at common law be called as a
witness without the consent of that person.

188. Application
This Sub-Part shall apply to all criminal proceedings.

188A. Admissibility of sound recording

(1) Subject to subsection (2), the sound recording of any evidence given
by any person charged with an offence shall be admissible in evidence in any
criminal proceedings where it is given to an investigating officer in the
course of an investigation of an offence.
(2) In the case of evidence of an admission, the sound recording of any
evidence shall be admissible where—
(a) the recording is made in the course of official questioning in ac-
cordance with the requirements set out in the Third Schedule;
and
(b) the admission is made by a person who is reasonably suspected
by an investigating officer as having committed an offence.
(3) The President may, by Order, specify the offences in relation to which
the sound recording of evidence of an admission by an accused party shall be
a condition precedent to the admissibility of such admission in evidence.

C54 – 49 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

(4) In this section—

“investigating officer” means a police officer or any public officer
whose function or duties includes functions or duties in respect of preven-
tion or investigation of offences;
“sound recording” includes recording of visual images or sounds.
(5) The common law rule against hearsay shall not prevent the admissi-
bility or use of a sound recording as evidence under this section and the
sound recording shall be admissible in evidence at any trial to the same ex-
tent and in the same manner as documentary evidence would be admissible.
[S. 188A inserted by Act 4 of 1999.]

188B. Admissibility of written statements

(1) In any criminal proceedings, a written statement by a person shall be
admissible as evidence to the like extent as oral evidence where—
(a) the statement purports to be signed by the person who made it;
(b) the statement contains a declaration by that person to the effect
that it is true to the best of his knowledge and belief and that he
made the statement knowing that, if it were tendered in evi-
dence, he could be liable to prosecution if he wilfully stated in it
anything which he knew to be false or did not believe to be true;
(c) before the hearing at which the statement is tendered in evi-
dence, a copy of the statement is served, by or on behalf of the
party proposing to tender it, on each of the other parties to the
proceedings; and
(d) none of the other parties or their Counsel, within 7 days from
the service of the copy of the statement, has served a notice on
the party proposing to tender it in evidence objecting to the
statement being so tendered.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), if the parties agree before or during
the hearing that the statements shall be tendered in evidence, the conditions
set out in subsection (1) (c) and (d) shall not apply.
(3) The following provisions shall also have effect in relation to any writ-
ten statement tendered in evidence under this section—
(a) where the statement is made by a person under the age of 21,
the age of the person shall be stated;
(b) where it is made by a person who cannot read it, it shall be read
to him before he signs it and shall be accompanied by a declara-
tion by the person who so read the statement to the effect that
it was so read; and
(c) where it refers to any other document as an exhibit, the copy
served on any party to the proceedings under subsection (1) (c)
shall be accompanied by a copy of that document or by such

[Issue 1] C54 – 50
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

information as may be necessary in order to enable the party on

whom it is served to inspect that document or a copy thereof.
(4) Notwithstanding subsection (1)—
(a) the party by whom or on whose behalf a copy of the statement
was served may call that person to give evidence; or
(b) the Court may, of its own motion or on the application of any
party to the proceedings, require that person to attend before
the Court and give evidence.
(5) An application to a Court may be made under subsection (4) (b)
before the hearing and, on any such application, the powers of the Court
shall be exercisable—
(a) in the case of a District Court, by the Magistrate of the District
Court;
(b) in the case of the Intermediate Court, by the President of the
Intermediate Court;
(c) in the case of the Industrial Court, by the President of the Indus-
trial Court;
(d) in the case of the Supreme Court, by any Judge of the Supreme
Court.
(6) The statement admitted in evidence under this section shall be read
aloud at the hearing unless the Court directs that only part of the statement
shall be so read and, where the Court so directs, an account shall be given
orally of the part of the statement that is not read aloud.
(7) Any document or object referred to as an exhibit and identified in a
written statement tendered in evidence under this section shall be treated as
if it had been produced as an exhibit and identified in Court by the maker of
the statement.
(8) A document required by this section to be served on any person may
be served—
(a) by delivering it to him or to his Counsel;
(b) by addressing it to him and leaving it as his usual or last known
place of abode or place of business or by addressing it to his
Counsel and leaving it at his office;
(c) by sending it in a registered letter or by the recorded delivery ser-
vice addressed to him at his usual or last known place of abode or
place of business or addressed to his Counsel at his office; or
(d) in the case of a body corporate, by delivering it to the secretary
or clerk of the body corporate at its registered or principal office
or sending it in a registered letter or by the recorded delivery
service addressed to the secretary or clerk of that body corpo-
rate at that office.
[S. 188B inserted by s. 3 (k) of Act 4 of 1999 w.e.f. 14 February 2000; amended by
s. 11 (1) (e) of Act 39 of 2011 w.e.f. 1 June 2011.]

C54 – 51 [Issue 4]
 Courts Act

188C. Admissibility of out of Court statement in piracy cases where maker

is unavailable
(1) In any criminal proceedings under the Piracy and Maritime Violence
Act, a statement made out of Court shall be admissible as evidence, with
leave of the Court, of any matter stated when—
(a) oral evidence given in the proceedings by the person who made
the statement would be admissible as evidence of that matter;
(b) the person who made the statement is identified to the Court’s
satisfaction; and
(c) one of the 5 conditions specified in subsection (2) is satisfied.
(2) The conditions referred to in subsection (1) (c) are that the person
who made the statement—
(a) is dead;
(b) is unfit to be a witness because of his bodily or mental condition;
(c) is outside Mauritius and it is not reasonably practicable to secure
his attendance;
(d) cannot be found although such steps as is reasonably practicable
to take to find him have been undertaken; or
(e) through fear, does not give or does not continue to give oral evi-
dence in the proceedings, either at all or in connection with the
subject matter of the statement.
(3) Where a statement is admitted in evidence under subsection (1), any
evidence which, if that person had been called as a witness, could have been
admissible for the purpose of impeaching or supporting his credibility, shall
be admissible for that purpose.
(4) In assessing the weight, if any, to be attached to a statement admit-
ted in evidence under subsection (1), the Court shall have regard to all the
circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to its
accuracy or otherwise.
[S. 188C inserted by s. 11 (1) (d) of Act 39 of 2011 w.e.f. 1 June 2012.]

189. Translation where not necessary in criminal cases

Where at a trial before a Judge, either with or without a jury, a witness
speaks in a language which is well understood by the accused, by all the
jurors, as well as by the Judge, the law officers of the State and the Counsel
engaged in the case, the examination of the witness may take place in such
language and it shall not be necessary to translate the deposition in English.
[S. 189 amended s. 23 (2) of by Act 48 of 1991 w.e.f. 12 March 1992.]

189A. Evidence of formal character

(1) In all criminal proceedings before any Court, an affidavit sworn by a
person whose evidence is of a formal character shall be sufficient evidence
of the facts stated therein.

[Issue 4] C54 – 52
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(2) The Court may, if it thinks fit, and shall, on the application of the
prosecution or the accused, summon and examine any such person as to the
facts contained in his affidavit.

Sub-Part III – Declarations instead of Oath

190. Declaration instead of oath
Every person who objects to being sworn and states, as the ground of his
objection, either that he has no religious belief, or that the taking of an oath
is contrary to his religious belief, shall be permitted to make his declaration
instead of taking an oath in all places and for all purposes where an oath is
required by law, which declaration shall be of the same force and effect as if
he had taken the oath.

191. Form of declaration

Every such declaration shall be as nearly as may be in the form—
“I ...................................................................... do solemnly, sincerely and truly
declare ........................................................................................................... ”
and shall then proceed with the words of the oath prescribed by law, omit-
ting words of imprecation or calling to witness.

192. Solemn affirmation

(1) Every person of the Hindu or Moslem faith shall make affirmation to
the following effect—
“I solemnly affirm in the presence of Almighty God that what I shall state shall be the
truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”
(2) Any person who knowingly makes a false affirmation shall commit an
offence and shall, on conviction, be liable to imprisonment for a term not
exceeding 10 years.
(3) —

continued on page C54 – 53

C54 – 52 (1) [Issue 4]

 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(4) Without prejudice to subsections (1) and (2), any party to, or witness
in, any judicial proceeding, civil or criminal, who is a Hindu or Moslem, or
any person whose religious belief prevents him from taking the ordinary oath,
may be called upon—
(a) by any other party to such proceeding; or
(b) in any criminal proceeding, by the prosecutor or the accused,
to give evidence on oath or solemn affirmation in any form common among,
or held binding by, persons of the race or persuasion to which he belongs
and not repugnant to justice or decency, and the Court may tender such oath
or affirmation notwithstanding subsection (1) or any other enactment.
(5) Where the oath or affirmation is of such a nature that it may be more
conveniently made out of Court, the Court may issue a commission to any
person to administer it, and the Court on being satisfied that the oath or af-
firmation has been administered may proceed to take evidence of the party
or witness accordingly.
(6) Where the party or witness refuses to make the oath or solemn affir-
mation referred to in subsection (4), he shall not be compelled to make it,
but shall give evidence on making the solemn affirmation, referred to in sub-
section (1), or the declaration prescribed by section 190, and the Court shall
record as part of the proceedings, the nature of the oath or affirmation pro-
posed, the fact that he was asked whether he would make it, and that he
refused it, together with any reason which he may assign for his refusal.
(7) Subsections (4), (5) and (6) shall apply to articles 1357 to 1369 of
the Code Civil Mauricien.

193. Validity of oath, affirmation or declaration

Where an oath has been duly administered and taken, the fact that the
person to whom the oath was administered should have made a solemn af-
firmation under section 192 or a declaration under sections 190 and 191 or
where a solemn affirmation or a declaration has been made by a person who
should have taken an oath, such error shall not affect the validity of the
oath, solemn affirmation or declaration respectively, if no protest is made by
the person sworn, solemnly affirmed or making the declaration, at the time
such oath, solemn affirmation or declaration is made or taken.

194. Form of declaration in writing

Every declaration in writing shall commence—
“I, of ................................. do solemnly, sincerely and truly declare
......................................... "
and the form in lieu of jurat shall be—
“Delivered at ................ this .............. day of ............................

Before me ..............................”

C54 – 53 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

195. Penalty for swearing false affidavit

(1) Any person who swears a false affidavit where an affidavit is required
or may be used, shall be liable to penal servitude for a term not exceeding
3 years and to a fine not exceeding 10,000 rupees.

(2) The prosecution may, in any case, take place before a District Court or
the Intermediate Court at the discretion of the Director of Public Prosecutions.
[S. 195 amended by Act 5 of 1999.]

196. Swearing with uplifted hands

Where any person to whom an oath is administered desires to swear with

uplifted hand, he shall be permitted so to do, and the oath shall be adminis-
tered to him in such form and manner without further question.

PART VI – MISCELLANEOUS

197. Reasons of judgment in criminal matters

(1) Notwithstanding any other enactment, a Judge or Magistrate, sitting

without a jury and exercising his jurisdiction, whether original or appellate, in
a criminal matter, shall, after hearing the case on both sides, record his
judgment in writing.

(2) Every such judgment shall contain the point or points for determina-
tion, the decision and the reasons for the decision, and shall be dated and
signed by the Judge or Magistrate at the time of judgment.

197A. Interest on judgment debts in accident cases

Notwithstanding any other enactment, where any person is adjudged by a

Court to be liable in damages pursuant to article 1382, 1383 or 1384 of the
Code Civil Mauricien in respect of a road accident or an accident at work,
the Court may order that he shall pay interest on the judgment debt at
15 per cent or such other rate as may be prescribed by Rules of Court made
by the Judges from the day on which the action was started unless the
Court is satisfied that there are good reasons for ordering such payment from
the date on which the pleadings were closed, up to the date of payment.
[S. 197A amended by Act 29 of 1990; Act 15 of 1994.]

197B. Costs in exaggerated claims

Notwithstanding any other enactment where in any civil case, any Court
is of opinion that a claim for any sum of money was exaggerated and could
have appropriately been entered before a Court of lesser jurisdiction, the
Court may award costs in such manner as it shall determine.
[S. 197B inserted by Act 29 of 1990.]

[Issue 1] C54 – 54
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

197C. Enquiry as to genuineness of deed

Subject to article 1319 of the Code Civil Mauricien, any action as to the
genuineness of any deed, whether authentic or under private signatures,
shall be entered by way of plaint with summons before the Supreme Court.
[S. 197C inserted by s. 3 (l) of Act 4 of 1999 w.e.f. 14 February 2000.]

197D. Wasted costs order

(1) The Magistrate, Master, Judge in Chambers or Court, as the case
may be, may, at any stage of any civil proceedings, on an application by a
party who has incurred wasted costs, order the legal representative of a
party to meet personally the whole or part of those costs as specified in the
Fifth Schedule.
(2) In this section—
(a) “wasted costs” means any costs incurred by a party—
(i) as a result of any improper, unreasonable or negligent act
or omission on the part of any legal representative or em-
ployee of the representative; or
(ii) which, in the light of any act or omission occurring after
the costs were incurred, the Court considers it unreason-
able to expect that party to pay.
(3) Before making a wasted costs order, the Magistrate, Master, Judge in
Chambers or Court, as the case may be, shall give the legal representative a
reasonable opportunity to show cause why he or it should not make a
wasted costs order and may make such enquiry as he or it thinks fit.
(4) Where the Magistrate, Master, Judge in Chambers or Court makes a
wasted costs order, he or it shall specify the amount to be paid in accor-
dance with the costs as specified in the Fifth Schedule.
(5) The Magistrate, Master, Judge in Chambers or Court may direct that
notice shall be given to the legal representative’s client, in such manner as
he or it may direct—
(a) of any proceedings under this section;
(b) of any order made by him or it against his legal representative.
(6) Any person against whom a wasted costs order has been made may
appeal, within 21 days of the order, to the Court exercising jurisdiction in
respect of the appeals from the Court which made the order.
[S. 197D inserted by s. 2 (d) of Act 15 of 2000 w.e.f. 30 June 2000.]

197E. Adjournment costs

Where any party applies for an adjournment at any stage of any civil pro-
ceedings, the Magistrate, Master, Judge in Chambers or Court, may, where
he or it grants the postponement on good cause shown, and there is an

C54 – 55 [Issue 3]
 Courts Act

application by the party who has incurred costs, make such order as to costs
as specified in the Fifth Schedule including costs in respect of the atten-
dance of witnesses.
[S. 197E inserted by s. 2 (d) of Act 15 of 2000 w.e.f. 30 June 2000.]

197F. Vexatious proceedings

(1) Where, on an application made by the Attorney-General, a Judge is
satisfied that any person has habitually, persistently and without any reason-
able grounds—
(a) instituted vexatious legal proceedings against the same person
or against different persons; or
(b) made vexatious applications in any legal proceedings instituted
by him or another person,
the Judge may, after giving that person an opportunity of being heard, de-
clare the person to be a vexatious litigant and order that—
(i) no legal proceedings shall, without the leave of the Supreme
Court, be instituted by him in any Court;
(ii) any legal proceedings instituted by him in any Court before the
making of the order shall not be continued by him without the
leave of the Supreme Court; or
(iii) no application, other than an application for leave under this sec-
tion, shall, without the leave of the Supreme Court, be made by
him in any legal proceedings instituted by him or another person
in any Court.
(2) The Master and Registrar of the Supreme Court shall cause a copy of
any order made under subsection (1) declaring any person to be a vexatious
litigant to the published in the Gazette and in such other manner as a Judge
may direct.
(3) An order made under subsection (1) may provide that it is to cease to
have effect at the end of a specified period, but shall otherwise remain in
force indefinitely.
(4) Leave for the institution or continuance of, or for the making of an
application in, any legal proceedings by a person who is the subject of an
order for the time being in force under subsection (1) shall not be given
unless the Supreme Court is satisfied that the proceedings or the application
are not an abuse of the process of the Court in question and that there are
reasonable grounds for the proceedings or application.
(5) No appeal shall lie from a decision of the Supreme Court refusing
leave for the institution or continuance of, or for the making of an application
in, legal proceedings by a person who is the subject of an order for the time
being in force under subsection (1).
(6) The provisions of this section shall be in addition to and not in dero-
gation from—
(a) the provisions of any other law for the striking out of vexatious
pleadings or prevention of abuse of process of the Court, or

[Issue 3] C54 – 56
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

which require consent, sanction or approval in any form of any

other authority for the institution or continuance of any civil or
criminal proceedings;
(b) the inherent jusidiction of the Supreme Court to prevent its
process from being abused or obstructed.
[S.197F inserted by s. 3 of Act 6 of 2011 w.e.f. 30 April 2011.]

198. Rules of Court

(1) The Chief Justice may, after consultation with the Rules Committee
and the Judges, make such rules as he thinks fit for the purposes of this Act.
(2) The following enactments shall be deemed to have been made by the
Chief Justice under subsection (1)—
(a) River Rules of 12 June 1885;
(b) River Rules of 22 October 1886;
(c) Bankruptcy Rules 1888;
(d) Sale of Immovable Property Rules 1889;
(e) Bankruptcy Court Rules 1899;
(f) Three-Judge Cases Rules 1906;
(g) Rules of the Supreme Court (State Proceedings) 1954;
(h) District Courts (State Proceedings) Rules 1954;
(i) Intermediate Court Rules 1971;
(j) Letters of Requests Rules 1985;
(k) Supreme Court (Jury Lists and Panels) Rules 1992;
(l) District, Industrial and Intermediate Court Rules 1992;
(m) District Court (Execution of Judgments) Regulations 1997;
(n) Supreme Court Rules 2000 and Legal Fees and Costs Rules
2000.
(3) Rules made under subsection (1) may provide for—
(a) the practice and procedure before any Court;
(b) the means by which particular facts may be proved and the
mode in which evidence thereof may be given in civil cases be-
fore any Court;
(c) the forms, registers and books that may be required for the
transaction of the business of the Courts;
(d) the fees to be charged and to accrue to the Consolidated Fund in
respect of any proceedings before any Court;
(e) the sums allowable on taxation in respect of any proceedings
before any Court;
(f) the electronic filing of documents and management of cases;
(g) the practice and procedure for mediation before a Judge.
[S. 198 repealed and replaced by s. 2 (e) of Act 15 of 2000 w.e.f. 30 June 2000; amended by
s. 6 (b) of Act 20 of 2009 w.e.f. 19 December 2009.]

C54 – 56 (1) [Issue 3]

 Revised Laws of Mauritius

199. Rules Committee

(1) There shall, for the purposes of section 198, be set up a Rules Com-
mittee which shall consist of—
(a) a Judge appointed by the Chief Justice, who shall be the Chair-
person;
(b) the Master or his representative;
(c) a representative of the Bar Council;
(d) a representative of the Mauritius Law Society;
(e) a representative of the Attorney-General’s Office;
(f) 2 other law practitioners appointed by the Chief Justice.
(2) The functions of the Rules Committee shall be to advise and make
recommendations to the Chief Justice in respect of the rules to be made un-
der section 198.
(3) For the purposes of its functions, the Rules Committee may under-
take such review as it thinks fit and give its advice or make its recommenda-
tions, on its own initiative, or as requested by the Chief Justice.
(4) The Rules Committee shall regulate its meetings and proceedings in
such manner as it thinks fit.
(5) The Chairperson and members of the Rules Committee shall be paid
such allowances as may be determined by the Chief Justice.
[S. 199 added by Act 15 of 2000.]

200. Amendment of Schedules

The Chief Justice may, after consultation with the Rules Committee and
the Judges, amend the Fourth and Fifth Schedules.
[S. 200 added by Act 15 of 2000.]

201. Practice directions

The Chief Justice may give such practice directions as he thinks fit to
regulate the practice and procedure before the Supreme Court.
[S. 201 added by Act 15 of 2000.]

FIRST SCHEDULE
[Section 69]
Ayurvedic and Other Traditional Medicines Act
Bus Industry Property Acquisition Act
Excise Act

C54 – 57 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

FIRST SCHEDULE—continued

Forests and Reserves Act

Ground Water Act
Labour Act
Medical Council Act
Nursing Council Act
Occupational Safety and Health Act
Professional Architects Council Act
Registered Professional Engineers Council Act
Tea Industry Control Act
Veterinary Council Act
Waste Water Management Authority Act
[First Sch. amended by Act 29 of 1992.]

SECOND SCHEDULE
[Section 113]
[Not reproduced – Obsolete.]

THIRD SCHEDULE
[Section 188A]

Sound Recording of Evidence

1. Sound recording of evidence shall be carried out in such manner as to instill

confidence in its reliability as an important and accurate record of the interview.

2. When the suspect is brought in the interview room the recording officer shall
without delay but in the sight of the suspect load the tape recorder with clean
tape and set it to record.

3. The tape shall be unwrapped or otherwise opened in the presence of the sus-
pect and each tape shall bear an identification number.

4. The recording officer shall then formally tell the suspect the following in rela-
tion to the sound recording—
(a) that the interview is being sound recorded, specifying the identifica-
tion number of the tape;

[Issue 1] C54 – 58
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(b) his name and rank and the name and rank of any other persons (in-
cluding legal representatives) present;
(c) the name of the suspect;
(d) the date, time of commencement and place of the interview.

5. The officer shall then caution the suspect in the following terms—
“You are not obliged to say anything unless you wish to do so but whatever
you say will be recorded and may be used as evidence in Court against you.”

6. The officer shall remind the suspect of his right to legal representation.

7. The officer shall then tell the suspect in ordinary language—

(a) what offence he is investigating;
(b) what fact he is asking the suspect to account for;
(c) that he believes this fact may be due to the suspect’s taking part in
the commission of the offence in question;
(d) that a record is being made of the interview and may be given in evi-
dence if he is brought to trial.

8. (1) If the suspect raises any objection to the interview being tape recorded
either at the outset or during the interview or during a break in the interview, the
officer shall explain the fact that the interview is being tape recorded and that
the suspect’s objections shall be recorded on tape.
(2) (a) When any objection has been recorded on tape or the suspect has
refused to have his objection recorded, the officer may turn off the recorder.
(b) In this eventuality he shall say that he is turning off the recorder and
give his reasons for doing so and then turn it off.
(3) The officer shall then make a written record of the interview.
(4) If, however, the officer reasonably considers that he may proceed to put
questions to the suspect with the tape recorder still on, he may do so.

9. If the suspect indicates that he wishes to tell the police officer about matters
not directly connected with the offence of which he is suspected and that he is
unwilling for these matters to be recorded on tape, he shall be given the oppor-
tunity to tell the police about these matters after the conclusion of the formal
interview.

10. (1) When the recorder indicates that the tapes have only a short time left
to run, the officer shall tell the suspect that the tapes are coming to an end and
round off that part of the interview.
(2) If the officer wishes to continue the interview but no second set of
tapes is readily available, he shall obtain a set.
(3) The suspect shall not be left unattended in the interview room.
(4) The officer shall remove the tapes from the recorder and insert the new
tapes which shall be unwrapped or otherwise opened in the suspect’s presence.
(5) (a) The recorder shall then be set to record on the new tapes.
(b) Care must be taken, particularly when a number of sets of tapes have
been used, to ensure that there is no confusion between the tapes.

C54 – 59 [Issue 1]
 Courts Act

(c) This may be done by marking the tapes with an identification number
immediately after they are removed from the recorder.

11. (1) When a break is to be taken during the course of an interview and the
interview room is to be vacated by the suspect, the fact that a break is to be
taken, the reason for it and the time shall be recorded on tape.
(2) When there is a break in questioning under caution the interviewing offi-
cer shall ensure that the person being questioned is aware that he remains under
caution and of his right to legal advice. If there is any doubt, the caution shall be
given again in full when the interview resumes.

12. (1) If there is a failure of equipment which can be rectified quickly, for ex-
ample by inserting new tapes, the appropriate procedures set out in para-
graph 10 shall be followed, and when the recording is resumed the officer shall
explain what has happened and record the time the interview resumes.
(2) If, however, it will not be possible to continue recording on that particu-
lar recorder and no replacement recorder or any other recorder in another inter-
view room is readily available, the interview may continue without being re-
corded. In such circumstances, the interview may be proceeded with in writing.

13. The whole of each interview shall be recorded. At the conclusion of the
interview, the suspect shall be offered the opportunity to clarify anything he has
said and to add anything he may wish.

14. (1) One tape, referred to herein as the master tape, will be sealed before it
leaves the presence of the suspect.
(2) A second tape will be used as a working copy. The master tape is either
one of the two tapes used in a twin deck machine or the only tape used in a sin-
gle deck machine.
(3) The working copy is either the second tape used in a twin deck machine
or copy of the master tape made by a single deck machine.

15. (1) At the interview, including the taking and reading back of any written
statement, the time shall be recorded and the recorder switched off.
(2) The master tape shall be sealed with a master tape label and treated as
an exhibit.
(3) The officer shall sign the label and ask the suspect and any third party
present to sign it also.
(4) If the suspect or third party refuses to sign the label, another appropri-
ate officer shall be called into the interview room and asked to sign it.

16. The officer shall make a note in writing of the fact that the interview has
taken place and has been recorded on tape, its time, duration and date and the
identification number of the master tape.

17. (1) The officer in charge of each police station at which interviews with
suspects are recorded shall make arrangements for master tapes to be kept se-
curely and their movements accounted for on the same basis as other material
which may be used for evidential purposes.
(2) (a) A police officer has no authority to break the seal on a master tape
which is required for criminal proceedings.

[Issue 1] C54 – 60
 Revised Laws of Mauritius

(b) If it is necessary to gain access to the master tape, the police officer
shall arrange for its seal to be broken in the presence of the suspect and his legal
adviser.
(c) The suspect or his legal adviser shall be informed and given a reason-
able opportunity to be present.
(d) If the suspect or his legal representative is present, the suspect shall
be invited to reseal and sign the master tape.
(e) If he refuses or is absent, this shall be done by the police officer in the
presence of another officer not below the rank of Superintendent of Police.
(3) In all other cases, the master tape shall be kept securely under lock and
key under the responsibility of an officer designated for that purpose until it is
removed for production in Court.
[Third Sch. Added by Act 4 of 1999.]

FOURTH SCHEDULE*
[Section 198]
[Fourth Sch. added by Act 15 of 2000.]

SUPREME COURT RULES 2000

[To be reproduced in Subsidiary Legislation Volume.]

∗
FIFTH SCHEDULE
[Section 198]
[Fifth Sch. added by Act 15 of 2000.]

LEGAL FEES AND COSTS RULES 2000

[To be reproduced in Subsidiary Legislation Volume.]

* EDITORIAL NOTE: These two Schedules were numbered Third and Fourth Schedules respec-
tively in the new section 198 (2) (a) of this Act enacted by section 2 of Act 15 of 2000.
The legislator, in the year 2000, overlooked that section 3 (m) of Act 4 of 1999 had already
added a Third Schedule to this Act. These two Schedules have been renumbered as Fourth
and Fifth Schedules respectively to avoid confusion as permitted under the Revision of Laws
Act.

C54 – 61 [Issue 1]