Hadden 1
Eli Hadden
English Composition 2
Professor Hellmers
Should College athletes get paid to play? Where does the hard-earned cash
college athletes make for their school go? Within the world of college sports it's going to
Nfl or come home with a degree and no extra money because you were not able to get
a job. Opponents of paying school athletes proclaim that a scholarship is a better
learning establishment and is supposed to be comfortable compensation. But I feel that
college athletes need to obtain more compensation and there are several reasons why I
think this. College athletics could be a billion greenback trade and has been for a
protracted time. Because of the increasing ratings of school athletics, this figure can still
rise. It's simple: larger, faster, stronger athletes can generate more cash. school
Universities generate such a lot of revenue throughout the year that it is solely honest to
the players that they get a cut. school athletes ought to get paid to support the
university’s revenue, attire sales, and lack of paying cash. Because of the finish of high
school approaches some student-athletes have the choice to play a sport in school.
One question they will raise themselves would be, “Is it worthwhile to play a sport in
college?”, considering all the time placed into the game while also having to take care of
smart grades. you want to be a really hard-working person to be a university contestant
because it is essentially a regular job jumping between the room, field/court, weight
area, and looking at the film. Imagine you are a college athlete; your daily routine would
carry with it rousing early most days to follow. When the morning follows, you attend
categories towards earning your school degree Then, since you often miss categories
Hadden 2
and are troubled to stay your grades up, you 've got a tutoring session. Lastly, to
complete your time off, you've got additional followers who can seemingly finish late
Athletes need to follow this routine the total academic year. This routine doesn't embody
any extra-curricular or social activities. With all the athletes’ time going towards their
sports and studies, they lack time to figure employment to own additional cash. There
are many reasons supporting why school athletes ought to be paid. One is that the
athletes don't have enough time to carry a gentle job as a result of they are perpetually
active or enjoying the game they are concerned in. College athletes should be paid
because they make millions and millions for their school and only get their college paid
a small amount as a scholarship , they spend more time on the field than classrooms,
and lastly, coaches earn millions a year, and players are no reward nearly as much.
Education is pricey, and plenty of sportsmen aren't given scholarships to assist pay
money for tuition, room, and board, or books. This may result in an increasing quantity
of debt as a result of having to borrow cash to pay money for education. many of us
believe athletes ought to get their exertions, whereas others believe that it might ruin the
integrity of school sports if athletes were paid. Once the National Collegiate Athletic
Association (NCAA) was made by President Roosevelt in 1906, there was a
commitment that a regular payment wouldn't be provided to the student-athletes United
Nations agency took half in its athletic organization. This supported the concept that
school sportsmen ought to be thought of amateurs, not professionals. In distinction,
today’s remunerative tv contracts became the driving revenue force behind AN
institution's ability to thrive in school athletics Recently, parenthetically, varied
Hadden 3
universities have modified their athletic conference affiliation as a result of exaggerated
monetary incentives.
According to Businessinsider.com, college athletes spend over 30 hours on
average a week just in practice while some reported they spent over 40 hours (1). But
college athletes are not required to simply play sports 40 hours a week. Along with
playing 40 hours a week athletes are required to pass all of their college classes as well
as making some extra money on the side. For example, “if a student has 10 hours of
class each week and puts in the recommended four hours of study for each hour of
class, then athletes spend 50 hours each week studying and attending mandatory
classes and study halls. This means that college athletes have to work 90 hours per
week just to remain in school on their scholarship. This is the equivalent to working two
full-time jobs with a side job on the weekends just to pay their bills” (Anderson 1).
Most people think a scholarship is way more than enough for athletes because they can
be up to 30 thousand dollars. Also students receive many perks of being college
athletes getting free hotels many times free food, being seen on national television . It
is hard to say how much all of that is worth but if you really look at the facts of it all it
might change your mind.Only about ⅓ of students get scholarships. Also most of the
scholarships don't even pay for all of the expenses. With all the time they put into
sports: “college athletes should be considered employees rather than students because
their first duty is to play sports for the university, ahead of obtaining an education”
(Zepel and Staudohaur 1).The Ncaa says that athletes are just students but makes
Hadden 4
them not attend class for games that bring the athletes nothing and the Ncaa big
revenue .
A college coaches’ job is to recruit players who they think have the talent to make them
win. Many times they offer scholarships to persuade the players to come. The whole
idea behind a scholarship is to make the student come to their school. Scholarships to
pay for rooms,tuitions ,and books but these athletes don't have money to pay for other
necessities.When providing a service everyone else gets paid for doing their service so
why shouldn't college athletes. College athletes bring in millions of fans to watch them
play. They bring in billions of dollars from these fans so there is room to pay the
athletes.
College athletes bring in a great amount of money for their schools. In 2015 a
study was performed of the two hundred thirty-one NCAA Division 1 schools. There was
a grand total of 9 billion in sales during the 2015 year. There are over 24 schools who
make over 100 billion in sales, but most of them make a great deal less than that. Of the
231 D1 schools in the United States, 76% of them make around fifty million in income
from their sports alone. I feel that players should be receiving some of this money,
because it will help keep them motivated to play their hardest for the school. The
college athletes are the ones who are helping bring in these great amounts of income,
so I feel they should be receiving some of the benefits of it.
A great deal of college athletes come from extremely poor backgrounds. In 2013 a
study was conducted that showed that around 86% of college athletes in the USA live
below the poverty line. If the schools would consider paying the athletes, it benefits
everyone. This would make future athletes want to go to college, which in return would
Hadden 5
bring in money and revenue for the schools. Most college athletes struggle to find time
to try and balance school, practice, and some even try to get a job. This could lead them
into accepting illegal gifts such as money, cars, clothes, etc.
Another side of the argument is that college athletes shouldn't be paid. College is
extremely expensive. To even get a few thousand dollars paid for is helpful. To get ALL
of your college paid for is incredibly helpful and will help you in the future when you
have to pay for a house and your family. Most people do not get scholarships and have
to pay for all of their college on their own. Many people say that since basketball and
other sports bring in a lot of money for the university, they should be paid back some
money. I do not think this is a valid statement because universities are already paying
back these students by paying for all of their schooling. I don’t think college athletes
understand how much this is helping them and how much of an advantage they have
over many others. They don’t see how much getting their college paid for his helping
them because they do not see the money upfront. Later on, in the future they will be
INCREDIBLY grateful. Getting all of your college paid for includes room and board,
education, books, and food. Athletes are also taken on incredible trips for free. Athletes
are worried they won’t have money for food and other things, but they get it all paid for.
A college “athlete” is considered someone who plays basketball or football or
baseball or swimming. Athletes are also considered to be members of the band,
cheerleaders, and dance team members (along with many more sports). The only
difference between these athlete groups is, members of the band, cheerleading team
and dance team are rarely given out scholarships. Every single college athlete. If you
pay one and not the other, there will be even more complaints and it will be a bigger
Hadden 6
problem. If we paid every single athlete, colleges would go bankrupt. Coaches already
do not get paid much, but if we pay athletes even more money, they will not be paid at
all. The university will not have money to give out scholarships to other students who
just attend for an education. This will steer away students and will cause them to go to a
school that offers them any type of scholarship. While steering other students away,
they will not get money from non college athletes and the university will for sure go
bankrupt. Also, taxes can play a huge role in this. “Depending on the athlete, taxes
could be high enough to the point where they don’t earn anything and they cannot pay
tuition” (Rivera). So I think the best decision is to not pay them additionally at all to avoid
this problem. Obviously with what I stated there are very solid arguments for both sides.
But athletes should just be given a small percentage of what they make for their school.
For example Ohio state football makes 68 million for their athletic program and all of the
rest of the sports there add up to about 60 million, so the football players obviously
should make a little more than the rest of the sports.
The NCAA makes around 1 billion dollars a year from broadcasting the sports. Schools
also make millions and millions from selling star players jerseys even though the name
isn't on the back it still has the number. Pro athletes get paid for their jerseys being sold.
So why don’t college athletes? For example, Clemson quarterback Trevor Lawrence
has a national championship to his name. He could have a million dollars or more as a
result of his college career .That could have been the sophomore's reality if college
athletes were able to sell their image on the open marketplace, experts in the
economics of sports suggest.That’s not allowed now under NCAA rules that restrict
Hadden 7
what athletes can earn. But America is drawing closer to an era in which college
athletes will be able to turn themselves into commercial ventures, and big stars like
Lawrence stand to benefit the most perhaps with endorsement deals that would pay
them more than a million dollars.
Unlike the NBA which pays half of the money to the players colleges don't pay
their athletes so there are billions of dollars that the coaches get paid from .While
million-dollar-plus salaries are commonplace in professional sports, they are highly
unusual in the world of higher education, where full time professors earn between
$20,000 to $126,000. The average college president makes $475,000. Coaches are
the highest-paid public employees in several states, including Kentucky and Kansas.
Also colleges can’t get star players by offering them big paychecks, the only things they
can do is show them their big stadiums and other things to help get star players there.
Also get a coach who has a great track record in getting lots of wins and producing NBA
players. I am saying all of this information because athletes could make money because
there are obviously billions and billions that go to The NCAA and coaches for having
star players when the players only get exposure in the end.
Hadden 8
In conclusion, college athletes should be paid. College athletes should be paid
because they make millions and millions for their school and only get their college paid
a small amount as a scholarship , they spend more time on the field than classrooms,
and lastly, coaches earn millions a year, and players earn no reward. A very very small
percentage of college athletes go on to play professionally and earn money so all of the
athletes that don’t play need to make money after. Most students have jobs throughout
college that allow them to come out of college with at least some money. Athletes don’t
get this. After college they will be coming out broke and most likely having to redo some
classes because of poor grades because of spending so much time in their sport and
not a lot studying. So if we pay these athletes at least a little bit of money , so when they
Hadden 9
get out of college they won’t be broke looking for jobs and most likely having to move
back in with their parents. So overall we should pay college athletes so they can have
money after school and so they have more of an incentive to play better and perhaps
prepare them for professional or even the real world.If schools feel that student-athletes
shouldn’t be paid while they’re in school, the funds could be held until after college
maybe even paying a bonus for those who graduate. That’s a nice incentive for the
athletes taking on the risk. They should be compensated for it.
Works cited
Hadden 10
Garda, Justin D. “Paying College Athletes.” Salem Press Encyclopedia, 2019.
EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=ers&AN=108690541&site=eds-live.
Hartnett, Tyson. “Why College Athletes Should Be Paid.” HuffPost, HuffPost, 23 Jan.
2014, www.huffpost.com/entry/college-athletes-should-be-paid_b_4133847.
Jacobs, Peter. “Here's The Insane Amount Of Time Student-Athletes Spend On
Practice.” Business Insider, Business Insider, 27 Jan. 2015,
www.businessinsider.com/college-student-athletes-spend-40-hours-a-week-practicing-
2015-1.
Paul Staudohar & B. Zepel, 2004. "Corruption in Big Time College Sports and its Impact
on Higher Education," IASE Conference Papers 0415, International Association of
Sports Economists.
“The Time Has Arrived for College Athletes to Be Paid.” UWIRE Text, 2019.
EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=edsgin&AN=edsgcl.605563667&site=eds-live