Academy of Technology
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Machining and Machine Tools Laboratory (ME-691)
Assignments and Lab Experiments: 4
Measurement of tool wear and evaluation of tool life in turning mild steel by HSS or
carbide tool
1. Objective: Experimental study of pattern of wear and measurement of magnitude of
wear of cutting tool by actual machining using microscope aiming determination of life
of single point turning tool under different machining conditions.
2. Pattern of tool wear: After machining for some time the cutting tool at its dip fails
and mostly by gradual wear and often by fracture or severe plastic deformation. The span
of tool life place significant role on productivity, job quality and overall economy of
machining. Tool wear cannot be prevented but attempt should be made to delay the
failure by reducing the rate of growth of tool wear.
The usual pattern and significant indices of tool wear are indicated in fig.1.
Fig. 1 Usual pattern of tool wear and wear indices
The major indices used to consider tool failure are the
i. Average flank wear, VB
ii. The depth of crater wear, Kr
A cutting tool is generally said to have failed when VB reaches 0.3mm and Kr reaches
0.15 mm, due to rubbing against the chip and the work surface under high pressure,
temperature and speed. The tool attains wear at its rake face and flank mainly by
Abrasion wear
Adhesion wear
Diffusing wear
Depending upon tool-work material and machining condition method.
3. Experimental determination of tool life
The life of a cutting tool is determined experimentally as indicated in fig. 2.
Fig. 2 Evaluation of tool life from growth of wear with machining time
4. Machine and equipments to be used:
Machine tool – centre lathe
Blank (job) – mild steel rod of given diameter and length
Cutting tool – HSS or WC tool tip of given geometry.
Optical microscope – interface with computer
Cutting fluid – soluble oil
5. Experimental result and discussion:
The measured values of VB are monitored at regular intervals with progress of machining
under pre-set speed – feed (VC – S0) combinations which are to be recorded as indicated
in the table.
Table: - VB measured at different VC – S0 combination
VC S0 ENV Average flank wear after
(m/min) (mm/rev) Dry/Wet 1min 2 min 5 min 10 15 20
min min min
V1
V2
V3
V4
The experimental results are plotted as indicated in figure 3.
Fig. 3 Evaluation of tool life from experimentally determined flank wear
From fig. 3 tool life value are taken for different VC and the TL Vs VC curves are drawn
(fig.4)
Cutting
velocity,
Vc
(m/min)
Tool life, T (min)
(b)
(a)
Fig. 4 Cutting velocity Vs tool life
From the fig. 4 the taylor’s tool life equation is derived in the from VTn = C, where n and
C are determined from fig. 4(b)
6. Remarks and conclusions