Behavioral                  Analysis
An Alternative to     Diagnostic Classification
                   FREDERICK H. KANFER, PhD, AND GEORGE           SASLOW, MD, PORTLAND, ORE
DuringURING the past decade attacks on conven-             permit prediction of responses to social stresses,
                                                           life crises, or psychiatric treatment. This limita¬
tional psychiatric diagnosis have been so wide-
spread that many clinicians now use diagnostic             tion obviates   anything but a crude and tentative
labels sparingly and apologetically. The con-              approximation     to a   taxonomy of effective indi¬
tinued adherence to the nosological terms of the           vidual behaviors.
traditional classificatory scheme suggests some               Zigler and Phillips,28 in   discussing the re¬
utility of the present categorization of behavior          quirement   for an  adequate system of classifica¬
disorders, despite its apparently low reliabil-            tion, suggest that an etiologically-oriented closed
ity 1,21; its limited prognostic value 7,26; and its       system of diagnosis is premature. Instead, they
multiple feebly related assumptive supports. In            believe that an empirical attack is needed, using
a recent study of this problem, the                        "symptoms broadly defined as meaningful and
                                          symptom
patterns of carefully diagnosed paranoid schizo-           discernible behaviors, as the basis of the classifi-
phrenics were compared. Katz et al12 found                 catory system" (p 616). But symptoms as a
considerable divergence among patients with                class of responses are defined after all only by
the same diagnosis and concluded that "diag-               their nuisance value to the patient's social en¬
nostic systems which are more circumscribed in             vironment or to himself as a social being. They
their intent, for example, based on manifest               are also notoriously unreliable in predicting the
behavior alone, rather than systems which at-              the patient's particular etiological history or his
tempt to comprehend etiology, symptom patterns             response to treatment. An alternate approach
andprognosis, may be more directly applicable              lies in an attempt to identify classes of
to currentproblems in psychiatric research"                dependent variables in human behavior which
(p202).                                                    would allow inferences about the particular con¬
   We propose here to examine some sources of              trolling factors, the social stimuli, the physio¬
dissatisfaction with the present approach to               logical stimuli, and the reinforcing stimuli, of
                                                           which they are a function. In the present early
diagnosis, to describe a framework for a be-
havioral analysis of individual patients which             stage of the art of psychological prognostication,
implies both suggestions for treatment and out-            it appears most reasonable to develop a program
come criteria for the single case, and to indicate         of analysis which is closely related to subsequent
the conditions for collecting the data for such            treatment. A classification scheme which implies
                                                           a program for behavioral change is one which
an   analysis.
                                                           has not only utility but the potential for experi¬
I. Problems in Current       Diagnostic Systems            mental validation.
     Numerous criticisms deal with the internal               The task of assessment and prognosis can
                                                           therefore be reduced to efforts which answer
consistency, the explicitness, the precision, and         the following three questions : (a) which specific
the reliability of psychiatric classifications. It
seems to us that the more important fault lies
                                                          behavior patterns require change in their fre¬
in our lack of sufficient knowledge to categorize         quency of occurrence, their intensity, their dura¬
behavior along those pertinent dimensions which           tion or in the conditions under which they occur,
  Submitted for publication Oct 9, 1964.
                                                          {b) what are the best practical means which can
  From the University of Oregon Medical School.           produce the desired changes in this individual
  Reprint requests to 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk       Rd,    (manipulation of the environment, of the be¬
Portland, Ore 97201 (Dr. Saslow).                         havior, or the self-attitudes of the patient), and
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
 (c) what factors are currently maintaining it               into a two-step process. A statistical procedure
and what are the conditions under which this                 is suggested to facilitate the primary or diag¬
behavior was acquired. The investigation of the              nostic labeling process. However, the choice of
history of the problematic behavior is mainly                treatment depends not only on the diagnosis
of academic interest, except as it contributes               proper. Treatment decisions are also influenced
information about the probable efficacy of a                 by the moral, ethical, social, and economic con¬
specific treatment method.                                   ditions of the individual patient, his family and
   Expectations of Current Diagnostic Sys¬                   the society in which he lives. The proper assign¬
 tems.—In traditional medicine, a diagnostic                 ment of the weight to be given to each of these
 statement about a patient has often been viewed             values must in the last analysis be left to the
 as an essential prerequisite to treatment because           physician's judgment (Ledley and Lusted14).
 a diagnosis suggests that the physician has some               The Ledley and Lusted model presumes avail¬
 knowledge of the origin and future course of                able methods for the observation of relevant
 the illness. Further, in medicine diagnosis fre¬            behavior (the symptom complex), and some
 quently brings together the accumulated knowl¬              scientific knowledge relating it to known ante¬
 edge about the pathological process which leads             cedents or correlates (the disease process). Con¬
 to the manifestation of the symptoms, and the               temporary theories of behavior pathology do not
 experiences which others have had in the past in            yet provide adequate guidelines for the observer
 treating patients with such a disease process.              to suggest what is to be observed. In fact,
 Modern medicine recognizes that any particular              Szasz 25 has expressed the view that the medicai
 disease need not have a single cause or even a              model may be totally inadequate because psy¬
 small number of antecedent conditions. Never¬               chiatry should be concerned with problems of
 theless, the diagnostic label attempts to define at         living and not with diseases of the brain or other
 least the necessary conditions which are most               biological organs. Szasz 25 argues that "mental
 relevant in considering a treatment program.                illness is a myth, whose function it is to disguise
 Some diagnostic classification system is also               and thus render more potable the bitter pill of
 invaluable as a basis for many social decisions             moral conflict in human relations" (p 118).
 involving entire populations. For example, plan¬                The attack against use of the medical model
 ning for treatment facilities, research efforts             in psychiatry comes from many quarters.
 and educational programs take into account the              Scheflen 23 describes a model of somatic psy¬
 distribution frequencies of specified syndromes             chiatry which is very similar to the traditional
 in the general population.                                  medical model of disease. A pathological process
    Ledley and Lusted 14 give an excellent con¬              results in onset of an illness; the symptoms are
 ception of the traditional model in medicine by             correlated with a pathological state and represent
 their analysis of the reasoning underlying it.              our evidence of "mental disease." Treatment
 The authors differentiate between a disease com¬            consists of removal of the pathogen, and the
 plex and a symptom complex. While the former                state of health is restored. Scheflen suggests that
 describes known pathological processes and                  this traditional medical model is used in psy¬
 their correlated signs, the latter represents par¬          chiatry not on the basis of its adequacy but
 ticular signs present in a particular patient. The          because of its emotional appeal.
 bridge between disease and symptom complexes                    The limitations of the somatic model have
 is provided by available medical knowledge and              been discussed even in some areas of medicine
 the final diagnosis is tantamount to labeling the           for which the model seems most appropriate.
 disease complex. However, the current gaps in               For example, in the nomenclature for diagnosis
 medical knowledge necessitate the use of proba¬             of disease of the heart and blood vessels, the
 bility statements when relating disease to symp¬            criteria committee of the New York Heart Asso¬
 toms, admitting that there is some possibility for          ciation 17 suggests the use of multiple criteria for
 error in the diagnosis. Once the diagnosis is               cardiovascular diseases, including a statement of
 established, decisions about treatment still de¬            the patient's functional capacity. The committee
 pend on many other factors including social,                suggests that the functional capacity be ". esti¬
                                                                                                          ..
 moral, and economic conditions. Ledley and                  mated by appraising the patient's ability to per¬
  Lusted14 thus separate the clinical diagnosis               form physical activity" (p 80), and decided
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
  largely by inference from his history. Further,17 lead to similar symptoms and respond to similar
  ". .
        (it) should not be influenced by the char¬ treatment. This dimension of diagnosis is con¬
         .
  acter of the structural lesion or by an opinion siderably more fruitful when dealing with be¬
  as to treatment or prognosis" (p 81). This ap¬ havior disorders which are mainly under control
  proach makes it clear that a comprehensive as¬ of some biological condition. When a patient is
  sessment of a patient, regardless of the physical known to suffer from excessive intake of alcohol
  disease which he suffers, must also take into his hallucinatory behavior, lack of motor co¬
  account his social effectiveness and the particular ordination, poor judgment, and other behavioral
  ways in which physiological, anatomical, and evidence disorganization can often be related
  psychological factors interact to produce a par¬ directly to some antecedent condition such as the
  ticular behavior pattern in    anindividual patient.       toxic effect of alcohol on the central nervous
     Multiple Diagnosis.—A widely used practical             system, liver, etc. For these cases, classification
   solution and circumvention of the difficulty in¬          by etiology also has some implications for prog¬
  herent in the application of the medical model             nosis and treatment. Acute hallucinations and
  to psychiatric diagnosis is offered by Noyes               other disorganized behavior due to alcohol
  and Kolb.18 They suggest that the clinician con¬          usually clear up when the alcohol level in the
  struct a diagnostic formulation consisting of              blood stream falls. Similar examples can be
  three parts : ( 1 ) A genetic diagnosis incorporat¬       drawn from any class of behavior disorders in
  ing the constitutional, somatic, and historical-          which a change in behavior is associated pri¬
  traumatic factors representing the primary                marily or exclusively with a single, particular
  sources or determinants of the mental illness;            antecedent factor. Under these conditions this
  (2) A dynamic diagnosis which describes the               factor can be called a pathogen and the situation
 mechanisms and techniques unconsciously used               closely approximates the condition described by
 by the individual to manage anxiety, enhance               the traditional medical model.
 self-esteem, ie, that traces the psychopathologi¬             Utilization of this dimension as a basis for
 cal processes; and (3) A clinical diagnosis which          psychiatric diagnosis, however, has many prob¬
 conveys useful connotations concerning the re¬             lems apart from the rarity with which a speci¬
 action syndrome, the probable course of the dis¬           fied condition can be shown to have a direct
 order, and the methods of treatment which will             "causal" relationship to a pathogen. Among the
 most probably prove beneficial. Noyes' and                current areas of ignorance in the fields of psy¬
 Kolb's multiple criteria 18 can be arranged along         chology and psychiatry, the etiology of most
 three simpler dimensions of diagnosis which               common disturbances probably takes first place.
 may have some practical value to the clinician :          No specific family environment, no dramatic
 (1) etiological, (2) behavioral, and (3) predic¬          traumatic experience, or known constitutional
 tive. The kind of information which is conveyed           abnormality has yet been found which results in
 by each type of diagnostic label is somewhat              the same pattern of disordered behavior. While
 different and specifically adapted to the purpose         current research efforts have aimed at investi¬
 for which the diagnosis is used. The triple-label         gating family patterns of schizophrenic patients,
 approach attempts to counter the criticism aimed          and several studies suggest a relationship be¬
 at use of any single classificatory system. Con¬          tween the mother's behavior and a schizophrenic
 fusion in a single system is due in part to the           process in the child,10 it is not at all clear why the
 fact that a diagnostic formulation intended to            presence of these same factors in other families
 describe current behavior, for example, may be            fails to yield a similar incidence of schizo¬
 found useless in an attempt to predict the re¬            phrenia. Further, patients may exhibit behavior
 sponse to specific treatment, or to postdict the          diagnosed as schizophrenic when there is no
 patient's personal history and development, or            evidence of the postulated mother-child relation¬
 to permit collection of frequency data on hos¬   ship.
 pital populations.                                 In a recent paper Meehlle postulates schizo¬
    Classification by Etiology.—The Kraepelinian phrenia as a neurological disease, with learned
 system and portions of the 1952 APA classifi¬ content and a dispositional basis. With this array
 cation emphasize etiological factors. They share of interactive etiological factors, it is clear that
 the assumption that common etiological factors the etiological dimension for classification would
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
  at best result in an extremely cumbersome sys¬                 Descriptive classification is not always this
  tem, at worst in a useless one.                             deceptive, however. Assessment of intellectual
     Classification by Symptoms.—A clinical diag¬             performance sometimes results in a diagnostic
  nosis often is a summarizing statement about the            statement which has predictive value for the
  way in which a person behaves. On the assump¬               patient's behavior in school or on a job. To
  tion that a variety of behaviors are correlated              date,   there   seem tobe very few general state¬
  and consistent in any given individual, it be¬               ments about     individual  characteristics, which
  comes more economical to assign the individual               have as much predictive utility as the IQ.
  to a class of persons than to list and categorize              A second limitation is that the current ap¬
  all of his behaviors. The utility of such a sys¬             proach to diagnosis by symptoms tends to center
  tem rests heavily on the availability of empirical           on a group of behaviors which is often irrelevant
  evidence concerning correlations among various               with regard to the patient's total life pattern.
   behaviors    (response-response relationships),             These behaviors may be of interest only because
   and the further assumption that the frequency of            they are popularly associated with deviancy and
   occurrence of such behaviors is relatively inde¬            disorder. For example, occasional mild delusions
   pendent of specific stimulus conditions and of              interfere little or not at all with the social or
   specific   reinforcement. There      are two    major       occupational effectiveness of many ambulatory
   limitations to such    system. The first is that
                          a                                    patients. Nevertheless, admission of their occur¬
   diagnosis by symptoms, as we have indicated in              rence is often sufficient for a diagnosis of
   an earlier section, is often misleading because             psychosis. Refinement of such an approach be¬
   it implies common etiological factors. Freed¬               yond current usage appears possible, as shown
   man
        7
          gives an excellent illustration of the dif¬          for example by Lorr et al15 but this does not
   ferences both in probable antecedent factors and            remove    the above limitations.
   subsequent treatment response among three                       Utilization of a symptom-descriptive ap¬
   cases diagnosed as schizophrenics. Freedman's               proach frequently focuses attention on by-prod¬
   patients were diagnosed by at least two psy¬                ucts of larger behavior patterns, and results in
   chiatrists, and one would expect that the tradi¬            attempted treatment of behaviors (symptoms)
   tional approach should result in whatever                   which may be simple consequences of other im¬
   treatment of schizophrenia is practiced in the              portant aspects of the patient's life. Emphasis
   locale where the patients are seen. The first pa¬           on the patient's subjective complaints, moods
   tient eventually gave increasing evidence of an             and feelings tends to encourage use of a syn¬
   endocrinopathy, and when this was recognized                drome-oriented classification. It also results fre¬
   and treated, the psychotic symptoms went into               quently in efforts to change the feelings,
   remission. The second case had a definite history           anxieties, and moods (or at least the patient's
   of seizures and appropriate anticonvulsant medi¬            report about them), rather than to investigate
   cation was effective in relieving his symptoms.             the life conditions, interpersonal reactions, and
   In the third case, treatment directed at an un¬             environmental factors which produce and main¬
   covering analysis of the patient's adaptive tech¬           tain these habitual response patterns.
   niques resulted in considerable improvement in                 Classification by Prognosis.—To date, the
   the patient's behavior and subsequent relief from           least effort has been devoted to construction of
   psychotic episodes. Freedman7 suggests that                 a   classification system which       assigns patients to
    schizophrenia is not a disease entity in the sense         the same category on the basis of their similar
   that it has a unique etiology, pathogenesis, etc,           response to specific treatments. The proper ques¬
   but that it represents the evocation of a final             tion raised for such a classification system con¬
    common pathway in the same sense as do head¬               sists of the manner in which a patient will react
   ache, epilepsy, sore throat, or indeed any other            to treatments, regardless of his current behavior,
    symptom complex. It is further suggested that              or his past history. The numerous studies at¬
   the term "schizophrenia has outlived its useful¬
    ness and should be discarded" (p 5). Opler
                                                  19·20        tempting to establish prognostic signs from
   has further shown the importance of cultural                projective personality tests or somatic tests
    factors in the divergence of symptoms observed             represent efforts to categorize the patients on
    in patients collectively labeled as schizophrenic.         this dimension.
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
   Windle   26 has called attention to the low de¬            II. A Functional     (Behavioral-Analytic)
gree of predictability afforded by personality                                    Approach
 (projective) test scores, and has pointed out the              The growing literature on behavior modi¬
difficulties encountered in evaluating research in          fication procedures derived from learning
this area due to the inadequate description of the          theory s,e,ii,i3,27 SUggests that an effective diag¬
population sampled and of the improvement                   nostic procedure would be one in which the
criteria. In a later review Fulkerson and Barry 8           eventual therapeutic methods can be directly re¬
came to the similar conclusion that psychological           lated to the information obtained from a con¬
test performance is a poor predictor of outcome             tinuing assessment of the patient's current
in mental illness. They suggest that demographic            behaviors and their controlling stimuli. Ferster ß
variables such    as   severity, duration,   acuteness      has said "... a functional analysis of behavior
of onset, degree of precipitating stress, etc, ap¬          has the advantage that it specifies the causes of
pear to have stronger relationships to outcome              behavior in the form of explicit environmental
than test data. The lack of reliable relationships          events which can be objectively identified and
between diagnostic categories, test data, demo¬             which are potentially manipulable" (p 3). Such
                                                            a diagnostic undertaking makes the assumption
graphic variables, or other measures taken on the
patient on the one hand, and duration of illness,           that a description of the problematic behavior,
response to specific treatment, or degree of re¬            its controlling factors, and the means by which
covery, on the other hand, precludes the con¬               it can be changed are the most appropriate
struction of a simple empiric framework for a               "explanations." It further makes the assump¬
diagnostic-prognostic classification system based           tion that a diagnostic evaluation is never com¬
only on an array of symptoms.                               plete. It implies that additional information
   None of the currently used dimensions for                about the circumstances of the patient's life
diagnosis is directly related to methods of                 pattern, relationships among his behaviors, and
modification of a patient's behavior, attitudes,            controlling stimuli in his social milieu and his
response patterns, and interpersonal actions.               private experience is obtained continuously
Since the etiological model clearly stresses                until it proves sufficient to effect a noticeable
causative factors, it is much more compatible               change in the patient's behavior, thus resolving
with a personality theory which strongly em¬                "the problem." In a functional approach it is
phasizes genetic-developmental factors. The                 necessary to continue evaluation of the patient's
classification by symptoms facilitates social-ad¬           life pattern and its controlling factors, concur¬
ministrative decisions about patients by provid¬            rent with attempted manipulation of these
ing some basis for judging the degree of                    variables by reinforcement, direct intervention,
deviation from social and ethical norms. Such               or other means until the resultant change in the
a classification is compatible with a personality           patient's behavior permits restoration of more
theory founded on the normal curve hypothesis               efficient life experiences.
and concerned with characterization by com¬                    The present approach shares with some psy¬
parison with a fictitious average. The prog¬                chological theories the assumption that psycho¬
nostic-predictive approach appears to have the              therapy is not an effort aimed at removal of
most direct practical applicability. If continued           intrapsychic conflicts, nor at a change in the
research were to support certain early findings,            personality structure by therapeutic interactions
it would be indeed comforting to be able to                 of intense nonverbal nature, (eg, transference,
predict outcome of mental illness from a pa¬                self-actualization, etc). We adopt the assump¬
tient's premorbid social competence score,28 or             tion instead that the job of psychological treat¬
from the patient's score on an ego-strength                 ment involves the utilization of a variety of
scale,4 or from many of the other signs and                 methods to devise a program which controls the
single variables which have been shown to have              patient's environment, his behavior, and the
some predictive powers. It is unfortunate that              consequences of his behavior in such a way that
these powers are frequently dissipated in cross             the presenting problem is resolved. We hypothe¬
validation. As Fulkerson and Barry have indi¬               size that the essential ingredients of a psycho¬
cated,8 single predictors have not yet shown                therapeutic endeavor usually involve two
much success.                                                separate stages : ( 1 ) a change in the perceptual
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
   discriminations of    a patient, ie, in his approach the pertinent controlling stimuli in his social and
   to  perceiving, classifying, and organizing sen¬ physical environment, and the sociological limi¬
   sory events, including perception of himself, and tations within which both patient and therapist
    (2) changes in the response patterns which he have to operate. Therefore, the initial formula¬
   has established in relation to social objects and tion will constantly be enlarged or changed, re¬
   to himself over the years.11 In addition, the sulting either in confirmation of the previous
   clinician's task may involve direct intervention therapeutic strategy or in its change.
   in the patient's environmental circumstances,          A Guide to a Functional Analysis of Indi¬
   modification of the behavior of other people vidual Behavior.—In order to help the clinician
   significant in his life, and control of reinforcing in the collection and organization of informa¬
   stimuli which are available either through self- tion for a behavioral analysis, we have con¬
   administration, or by contingency upon the be¬ structed an outline which aims to provide a
   havior of others. These latter procedures working model of the patient's behavior at a
   complement the verbal interactions of traditional relatively low level of abstraction. A series of
   psychotherapy. They require that the clinician, questions are so organized as to yield immediate
   at the invitation of the patient or his family, par¬ implications for treatment. This outline has been
   ticipate more fully in planning the total life found useful both in clinical practice and in
   pattern of the patient outside the clinician's teaching. Following is a brief summary of the
   office.                                              categories in the outline.*
       It is necessary to indicate what the theoretical        1. Analysis of a Problem Situation: f The patient's
   view here presented does not espouse in order to           major complaints are categorized into classes of be¬
                                                              havioral   excesses   and deficits. For each   excess or   deficit
   understand the differences from other proce¬               the dimensions of  frequency, intensity, duration,            ap¬
   dures. It does not rest upon the assumption that           propriateness of form, and stimulus conditions                are
    (a) insight is a sine qua non of psychotherapy,           described. In content, the response classes represent
    ( b ) changes in thoughts or ideas inevitably lead        the major targets of the therapeutic intervention. As
                                                              an additional indispensable feature, the behavioral
   to ultimate changes in actions, {c) verbal thera¬
                                                              assets of the patient are listed for utilization in a
   peutic sessions serve as replications of and               therapy program.
   equivalents for actual life situations, and {d)              2. Clarification of the Problem Situation : Here we
   a symptom can be removed only by uprooting                 consider the people and circumstances which tend to
   its cause or origin. In the absence of these as¬           maintain the problem behaviors, and the consequences
                                                              of these behaviors to the patient and to others in his
   sumptions it becomes unnecessary to conceptual¬            environment. Attention is given also to the conse¬
   ize behavior disorder in etiological terms, in
                                                              quences of changes in these behaviors which may
   psychodynamic terms, or in terms of a specifi¬             result from psychiatric intervention.
   able disease process. While psychotherapy by                 3. Motivational Analysis : Since reinforcing stimuli
   verbal means may be sufficient in some instances,          are idiosyncratic and depend for their effect on a num¬
   the combination of behavior modification in life           ber of unique parameters for each person, a hierarchy
                                                              of particular persons, events, and objects which serve
   situations as well as in verbal interactions serves
   to extend the armamentarium of the therapist.                *A    limited supply of the full outline is available
                                                              and    copies can be obtained upon request from us.
   Therefore verbal psychotherapy is seen as an
                                                                 t For each patient a detailed analysis is required.
   adjunct in the implementation of therapeutic be¬           For example, a list of behavioral excesses may include
   havior changes in the patient's total life pattern,        specific aggressive acts, hallucinatory behaviors, cry-
   not as an end in itself, nor as the sole vehicle           ing, submission to others in social situations, etc. It is
   for increasing psychological effectiveness.                recognized that some behaviors can be viewed as
                                                              excesses or deficits depending on the vantage point
       In embracing this view of behavior modifica¬
                                                              from which the imbalance is observed. For instance,
   tion, there is a further commitment to a constant          excessive withdrawal and deficient social responsive-
   interplay between assessment and therapeutic               ness, or excessive social autonomy (nonconformity)
   strategies. An initial diagnostic formulation              and deficient self-inhibitory behavior may be comple-
   seeks to ascertain the major variables which can           mentary. The particular view taken is of consequence
   be directly controlled or modified during treat¬           because of its impact on a treatment plan. Regarding
                                                              certain behavior as excessively aggressive, to be re-
   ment. During successive treatment stages addi¬             duced by constraints, clearly differs from regarding
   tional information is collected about the patient's        the same behavior as a deficit in self-control, subject
   behavior repertoire, his reinforcement history,            to increase by training and treatment.
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
as rein forcers is established for each patient. Included      The formulation of a treatment plan follows
in this hierarchy are those reinforcing events which        from this type of analysis because knowledge
facilitate approach behaviors as well as those which,       of the reinforcing conditions suggests the moti¬
because of their aversiveness, prompt avoidance re¬
                                                            vational controls at the disposal of the clinician
sponses. This information has as its purpose to lay
                                                            for the modification of the patient's behavior.
plans for utilization of various reinforcers in pre¬
scription of a specific behavior therapy program for        The analysis of specific problem behaviors also
the patient, and to permit utilization of appropriate       provides a series of goals for psychotherapy or
reinforcing behaviors by the therapist and significant      other treatment, and for the evaluation of treat¬
others in the patient's social environment.
                                                            ment progress. Knowledge of the patient's bio¬
   4. Developmental Analysis : Questions are asked
about the patient's biological equipment, his sociocul¬     logical, social, and cultural conditions should
tural experiences, and his characteristic behavioral        help to determine what resources can be. used,
development. They are phrased in such a way as (a)          and what limitations must be considered in a
to evoke descriptions of his habitual behavior at           treatment   plan.
various chronological stages of his life, ( ) to relate        The various categories attempt to call atten¬
specific new stimulus conditions to noticeable changes      tion to important variables affecting the patient's
from his habitual behavior, and (c) to relate such
altered behavior and other residuals of biological and      current behavior. Therefore, they aim to elicit
sociocultural events to the present problem.                descriptions of low-level abstraction. Answers
  5. Analysis of Self-Control : This section examines       to these specific questions are best phrased by
both the methods and the degree of self-control             describing classes of events reported by the
exercised by the patient in his daily life. Persons,
                                                            patient, observed by others, or by critical inci¬
events, or institutions which have successfully rein¬       dents described by an informant. The analysis
forced self-controlling behaviors are considered. The
deficits or excesses of self-control are evaluated in       does not exclude description of the patient's
relation to their importance as therapeutic targets         habitual verbal-symbolic behaviors. However, in
and to their utilization in a therapeutic program.          using verbal behaviors as the basis for this
   6. Analysis of Social Relationships : Examination        analysis, one should be cautious not to "explain"
of the patient's social network is carried out to evalu¬    verbal processes in terms of postulated internal
ate the significance of people in the patient's environ¬
ment who have some influence over the problematic
                                                            mechanisms without adequate supportive evi¬
behaviors, or who in turn are influenced by the patient     dence, nor should inference be made about
for his own satisfactions. These interpersonal relation¬    nonobserved processes or events without corrob¬
ships are reviewed in order to plan the potential par¬      orative evidence. The analysis includes many
ticipation of significant others in a treatment program,    items which are not known or not applicable
based on the principles of behavior modification. The
review also helps the therapist to consider the range of
                                                            for a given patient. Lack of information on some
actual social relationships in which the patient needs      items does not necessarily indicate incomplete¬
to function.                                                ness of the analysis. These lacks must be noted
   7. Analysis of the Social-Cultural-Physical En¬          nevertheless because they often contribute to the
vironment : In this section we add to the preceding         better understanding of what the patient needs
analysis of the patient's behavior as an individual,        to learn to become an autonomous person. Just
consideration of the norms in his natural environment.
                                                            as important is an inventory of his existing
Agreements and discrepancies between the patient's
idiosyncratic life patterns and the norms in his en¬        socially effective behavioral repertoire which
vironment are defined so that the importance of these       can be put in the service of any treatment pro¬
factors can be decided in formulating treatment goals       cedure.
which allow as explicitly for the patient's needs as for       This analysis is consistent with our earlier
the pressures of his social environment.
                                                            formulations of the principles of comprehensive
   The preceding outline has as its purpose to              medicine 9*22 which emphasized the joint opera¬
achieve definition of a patient's problem in a              tion of biological, social, and psychological
manner which suggests specific treatment op¬
                                                            factors in psychiatric disorders. The language
erations, or that none are feasible, and specific           and orientation of the proposed approach are
behaviors as targets for modification. There¬               rooted in contemporary learning theory. The
fore, the formulation is action oriented. It can            conceptual framework is consonant with the
be used as a guide for the initial collection of            view that the course of psychiatric disorders
information, as a device for organizing avail¬              can be modified by systematic application of
able data, or as a design for treatment.                    scientific principles from the fields of psychology
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
  and medicine    to   the   patient's   habitual mode of    home or having had homosexual experiences)
  living.                                                    lies in its relation to the independent variables
     This approach is not a substitute for assign¬           which can be identified as controlling the cur¬
  ment    of the patient to traditional diagnostic           rent problematic behavior. The observation that
                                                             a patient has hallucinated on occasions may be
  categories. Such labeling may be desirable for
  statistical, administrative, or research purposes.         important only if it has bearing on his present
  But the current analysis is intended to replace            problem. If looked upon in isolation, a report
  other diagnostic formulations purporting to                about hallucinations may be misleading, result¬
  serve as a basis for making decisions about spe¬           ing in emphasis on classification rather than
  cific therapeutic interventions.                            treatment.
                                                                In the psychiatric interview a behavioral-
     III. Methods of Data Collection for              a       analytic approach opposes acceptance of the
                 Functional       Analysis                    content of the verbal self-report as equivalent to
     Traditional diagnostic approaches have                   actual events or experiences. However, verbal
  utilized as the main sources of information the             reports provide information concerning the pa¬
                                                              tient's verbal construction of his environment
  patient's verbal report, his nonverbal behavior             and of his person, his recall of past experiences,
  during an interview, and his performance on                 and his fantasies about them. While these self-
  psychological tests. These observations are
  sufficient if one regards behavior problems only            descriptions do not represent data about events
  as a property of the patient's particular pattern
                                                              which actually occur internally, they do repre¬
                                                              sent current behaviors of the patient and indi¬
  of associations or his personality structure. A
                                                              cate the verbal chains and repertoires which the
  mental disorder would be expected to reveal it¬
  self by stylistic characteristics in the patient's          patients has built up. Therefore, the verbal be¬
  behavior repertoire. However, if one views be¬              havior may be useful for description of a pa¬
  havior disorders as sets of response patterns               tient's thinking processes. To make the most of
  which are learned under particular conditions               such an approach, variations on traditional in¬
  and maintained by definable environmental and               terview procedures may be obtained by such
  internal stimuli, an assessment of the patient's            techniques as role playing, discussion, and in¬
  behavior output is insufficient unless it also de¬          terpretation of current life events, or controlled
                                                               free association. Since there is little experi¬
  scribes the conditions under which it occurs.
                                                              mental evidence of specific relationships be¬
  This view requires an expansion of the
                                                              tween the patient's verbal statements and his
  clinician's sources of observations to include the
                                                              nonverbal behavioral acts, the verbal report
  stimulation fields in which the patient lives, and
                                                              alone remains insufficient for a complete analy¬
  the variations of patient behavior as a function
                                                               sis and for prediction of his daily behavior.
  of exposure to these various stimulational
  variables. Therefore, the resourceful clinician
                                                               Further, it is well known that a person responds
                                                               to environmental conditions and to internal cues
  need not limit himself to test findings, interview
                                                               which he cannot describe adequately. There¬
  observations in the clinician's office, or referral
  histories alone in the formulation of the specific           fore, any verbal report may miss or mask the
                                                               most important aspects of a behavioral analysis,
  case. Nor need he regard himself as hopelessly
                                                               ie, the description of the relationship between
  handicapped when the patient has little observa¬             antecedent conditions and subsequent behavior.
  tional or communicative skill in verbally recon¬
                                                                  In addition to the use of the clinician's own
   structing his life experiences for the clinician.
  Regardless of the patient's communicative skills             person as a controlled stimulus object in inter¬
  the data must consist of a description of the pa¬            view situations, observations of interaction with
  tient's behavior in relationship to varying en¬              significant others can be used for the analysis of
  vironmental conditions.                                      variations in frequency of various behaviors as
      A behavioral analysis excludes no data re¬               a function of the person with whom the patient
  lating to a patient's past or present experiences            interacts. For example, use of prescribed stand¬
  as irrelevant. However, the relative merit of                ard roles for nurses and attendants, utilization
  any information (as, eg, growing up in a broken              of members of the patient's family or his
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
 friends, may be made to obtain data relevant to            brief samples of patient behaviors in work
 the patient's habitual interpersonal response pat¬         situations can be obtained by minimally trained
 tern. Such observations are especially useful if           observers.
 in a later interview the patient is asked to                  The patient himself may be asked to provide
 describe and discuss the observed sessions.                samples of his own behavior by using tape re¬
 Confrontations with tape recordings for com¬               corders for the recording of segments of inter¬
 parisons between the patient's report and the              actions in his family, at work, or in other
 actual session as witnessed by the observer may            situations during his everyday life. A television
 provide information about the patient's per¬               monitoring system for the patient's behavior is
                                                            an excellent technique from a theoretical view¬
 ception of himself and others as well as his
 habitual behavior toward peers, authority                  point but it is extremely cumbersome and ex¬
 figures, and other significant people in his life.         pensive. Use of recordings for diagnostic and
    Except in working with children or family               therapeutic purposes has been reported by some
 units, insufficient use has been made of material          investigators.2,5·24 Playback of the recordings
 obtained from other informants in interviews               and a recording of the patient's reactions to the
 about the patient. These reports can aid the ob¬           playback can be used further in interviews to
 server to recognize behavioral domains in which            clarify the patient's behavior toward others and
 the patient's report deviates from or agrees with          his reaction to himself as a social stimulus.
 the descriptions provided by others. Such in¬                 Psychological tests represent problems to be
 formation is also useful for contrasting the pa¬           solved under specified interactional conditions.
 tient's reports about his presumptive effects on           Between the highly standardized intelligence
 another person with the stated effects by that             tests and the unstructured and ambiguous pro¬
 person. If a patient's interpersonal problems              jective tests lies a dimension of structure along
 extend to areas in which social contacts are not           which more and more responsibility for pro¬
 clearly defined, contributions by informants               viding appropriate responses falls on the pa¬
 other than the patient are essential.                      tient. By comparison with interview procedures,
     It must be noted that verbal reports by other          most    psychological    tests   provide   a   relatively
 informants may be no more congruent with                   greater standardization of stimulus conditions.
 actual events than the patient's own reports and           But, in addition to the specific answers given on
 need to be equally related to the informant's              intelligence tests or on projective tests these
 own credibility. If such crucial figures as                tests also provide a behavioral sample of the pa¬
 parents, spouses, employers can be so inter¬               tient's reaction to a problem situation in a rela¬
 viewed, they also provide the clinician with some          tively stressful interpersonal setting. Therefore,
 information about those people with whom the               psychological tests can provide not only quanti¬
 patient must interact repeatedly and with whom             tative scores but they can also be treated as a
 interpersonal problems may have developed.                 miniature life experience, yielding information
     Some observation of the patient's daily work           about the patient's interpersonal behavior and
  behavior represents an excellent source of in¬            variations in his behavior as a function of the
  formation, if it can be made available. Observa¬          nature of the stimulus conditions.
 tion of the patient by the clinician or his staff             In this section we have mentioned only some
                                                            of the numerous life situations which can be
 may be    preferable   to   descriptions by   peers   or
 supervisors. Work observations are especially              evaluated in order to provide information about
 important for patients whose complaints include            the patient. Criteria for their use lies in econ¬
 difficulties in their daily work activity or who           omy, accessibility to the clinician, and relevance
 describe work situations as contributing factors           to the patient's problem. While it is more con¬
 to their problem. While freer use of this tech¬            venient to gather data from a patient in an
 nique may be hampered by cultural attitudes                office, it may be necessary for the clinician to
 toward psychiatric treatment in the marginally             have first-hand information about the actual
 adjusted, such observations may be freely ac¬              conditions under which the patient lives and
 cessible in hospital situations or in sheltered            works. Such familiarity may be obtained either
 work situations. With use of behavior rating               by utilization of informants or by the clinician's
 scales or other simple measurement devices,                entry into the home, the job situation, or the
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016
  social environment in which the patient lives.                The last section of the paper deals with
  Under all these conditions the clinician is effec¬          methods useful for collection of information
  tive only if it is possible for him to maintain a           necessary to complete such a behavior analysis.
                                                                This paper was written in conjunction with Re¬
  nonparticipating, objective, and observational              search
                                                        grant MH 06921-03 from the National Institutes
  role with no untoward consequences for the pa¬ of Mental
                                                           Health, United States Public Health Service.
  tient or the treatment relationship.
     The methods of data collecting for a func¬
  tional analysis described here differ from tradi¬ REFERENCES
  tional psychiatric approaches only in that they
  require inclusion of the physical and social
  stimulus field in which the patient actually
  operates. Only a full appraisal of the patient's
  living and working conditions and his way of
  life allow a description of the actual problems
  which the patient faces and the specification of
  steps to be taken for altering the problematic
  situation.
                     Summary
     Current psychiatric classification falls short
  of providing a satisfactory basis for the under¬
  standing and treatment of maladaptive behavior.
  Diagnostic schémas now in use are based on
  etiology, symptom description, or prognosis.
  While each of these approaches has a limited
  utility, no unified schema is available which per¬
  mits   prediction of response to treatment or
  future course of the disorder from the assign¬
  ment of the patient to a specific category.
    This paper suggests a behavior-analytic ap¬
  proach which is based on contemporary learning
  theory, as an alternative to assignment of the
  patient to a conventional diagnostic category. It
 includes the summary of an outline which can
 serve as a guide for the collection of informa¬
 tion and formulation of the problem, including
 the biological, social, and behavioral conditions
 which are determining the patient's behavior.
 The outline aims toward integration of informa¬
 tion about a patient for formulation of an action
 plan which would modify the patient's problem¬
 atic behavior. Emphasis is given to the partic¬
 ular variables affecting the individual patient
 rather than determination of the similarity of
 the patient's history or his symptoms to known
 pathological groups.
Downloaded From: http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of Pittsburgh User on 05/01/2016