Particulars NO. NO. 1.: Nexgen Career
Particulars NO. NO. 1.: Nexgen Career
  1.                                         1
          INTRODUCTION
                                             1
          1.1 Introduction to the Study
          1.2 Company Profile                4
                   NEXGEN CAREER
                3.3 Suggestions and Recommendation                        52
3.4 Conclusion 53
4 APPENDICES
4.1Questionnaire 55
4.2 References 65
CHAPTER-1
INTRODUTION
1.1 Introduction
                                       2
behavioral scientists use the word motivation, they think of its something
steaming from within the person technically, the term motivation has its origin
in the Latin word “mover” which means “to move”. Thus the word motivation
stands for movement. If a manager truly understands his subordinate’s
motivation, he can channel their “inner state” towards command goals, i.e.,
goals, shared by both the individual and the organization. It is a well known
fact that human beings have great potential but they do not use it fully, when
motivation is absent. Motivation factor are those which make people give
more than a fair day’s work and that is usually only about sixty- five percent
of a person’s capacity .Obviously , every manager should be releasing hundred
percent of an individual’s to maximize performance for achieving
organizational goals and at the same to enable the individual to develop his
potential and gain satisfaction. Thus every manager should have both interest
and concern about how to enable people to perform task willingly and to the
best of their ability. At one time, employees were considered just another
input into the production of goods and services. What perhaps changed this
way of thinking about employees was research, referred to as the Hawthorne
Studies, conducted by Elton Mayo from1924 to 1932 This study found
employees are not motivated solely by money and employee behavior is
linked to their attitudes.
                                       3
         "The only way to get people to like working hard is to motivate
   them. Today, people must understand why they're working hard. Every
   individual in an organization is motivated by something different." -
   Rick Pitino
                                  5
         reliable and comprehensive systems in the workplace to help motivate
         employees.
The level of a subordinate or a employee does not only depend upon his
qualifications and abilities. For getting best of his work performance, the gap
between ability and willingness has to be filled which helps in improving the
level of performance of subordinates. This will result into-
                 Increase in productivity,
        Reducing cost of operations, and
                                            6
The goals of an enterprise can be achieved only when the following factors
take place :-
Every person has a different reason for going to work. These reasons are as
individual as whichever person you may ask. But all of the reasons for working
share a common thread. We all obtain something from work we need.
4. Purpose: Today people care more about what happens tomorrow, and want
to contribute to ensuring the future of our children, and the health of our
communities and planet.
                                       8
5. Trust: the fabric that holds it all together and makes it real.
Framework of motivation
    1) Motivation process begins with the individual’s needs. Needs are telt
       deprivations which the individual experiences at a given time and act
       as energizers. These needs may be psychological (e.g., the needs for
       recognition), physiological (e.g., the needs for water, air or foods) or
       social (e.g., the needs for friendship).
    2) Motivation is goal directed.
    3) A goal is a specific result that the individual wants to achieve. An
       employee’s goal are often driving forces and accomplishing those
       goals can significantly reduce needs.
    4) Promotions and raises are two of the ways that organizations seek to
       maintain desirable behavior. They are signals to employees that their
       needs for advancement and recognition and their behaviors are
       appropriate.
    5) Once the employee have received either rewards or punishments.
    6) They reassess their needs.
                                         9
employees' income increases, money becomes less of a motivator (Kovach,
1987). Also, as employees get older, interesting work becomes more of a
motivator.
Mechanism of motivation
Mechanism of Motivation
With of Drives
Direction
Thus, the key to understanding motivation lies in the meaning of, and
relationship between needs, drives and goals Needs: Needs are created
whenever there is a physiological or psychological imbalance For example: A
need exists when cells in the body are deprived of food and water or when the
personality is deprived of other people who serve friends or companions.
Although psychological may be based on a deficiency, sometimes they are
not. For instant, and individuals with a strong need to get ahead may have a
history of consistent success· Drives: “Drives (Or motives) are set up to
alleviate needs. Psychological needs can be simply defined as a deficiency
with direction. Physiological or psychological drives are action – oriented and
provide energizing thrust towards reaching an incentive or goals. They are at
the very heart of the motivational process. The needs for food and water are
translated into hunger and thrust drives, and the need for friend becomes a
drives affiliation. Thus, drive is a psychological state which moves an
                                      10
individual satisfying need· Goals: At the end of the motivational cycle is the
goal or incentive. It is anything that wills that will alleviate a need and reduce
a drive. Thus, attaining a goal will tend to restore physiological or
psychological balance and will reduce or cut off the drive. Eating food,
drinking water and obtaining friends will tend to restore the balance and
reduce the corresponding drives food, water and friends are the incentive are
the goals in this example.
Why do people do what they do? Why do we go on every day, living our lives
and trying to find justification for our existence? Some people think that they
can find purpose in the things that motivate them. Others just see the
motivation                   and              react                automatically.
There is no one thing that motivates people to perform certain actions. People
are different, so it follows that their motivations have to be different. Here are
some types of motivation           :
 Achievement –
                                        11
This is the motivation of a person to attain goals. The longing for achievement
is inherent in every man, but not all persons look to achievement as their
motivation. They are motivated by a goal. In order to attain that goal, they are
willing to go as far as possible. The complexity of the goal is determined by a
person's                                                            perception.
To us, the terms "simple" and "complex" are purely relative. What one person
thinks is an easy goal to accomplish may seem to be impossible to another
person. However, if your motivation is achievement, you will find that your
goals will grow increasingly complex as time goes by         .
 Socialization –
 Incentive motivation –
This motivation involves rewards. People who believe that they will receive
rewards for doing something are motivated to do everything they can to reach
                                     12
a certain goal. While achievement motivation is focused on the goal itself,
incentive motivation is driven by the fact that the goal will give people
benefits. Incentive motivation is used in companies through bonuses and other
types        of           compensation            for      additional     work.
 Fear motivation –
When incentives do not work, people often turn to fear and punishment as the
next tools. Fear motivation involves pointing out various consequences if
someone does not follow a set of prescribed behavior. This is often seen in
companies as working hand- in- hand with incentive motivation. Workers are
often faced with a reward and punishment system, wherein they are given
incentives if they accomplish a certain goal, but they are given punishments
when               they           disobey               certain         policies.
 Change motivation-
 Natural Motivations-
Motivation is the most common type of motivation and happens the most
often. It is the motivation people get when naturally motivated.
                                             13
               Fear motivations-
Fear Motivation happens often within the workforce when under pressure to
complete a task.
 Booster motivations-
Booster Motivations is normally self driven to overcome a task you have set
yourself.
                                        14
      Creativity And Innovation - At many companies, employees
with creative ideas do not express them to management for fear that
their input will be ignored or ridiculed. Company approval and toeing
the company line have become so ingrained in some working
environments that both the employee and the organization suffer.
When the power to create in the organization is pushed down from the
top to line personnel, employees who know a job, product, or service
best are given the opportunity to use their ideas to improve it. The
power to create motivates employees and benefits the organization in
having a more flexible work force, using more wisely the experience
of its employees, and increasing the exchange of ideas and information
among employees and departments. These improvements also create
an openness to change that can give a company the ability to respond
quickly to market changes and sustain a first mover advantage in the
marketplace.
              Other Incentives - Study after study has found that the most
       effective
       motivators of workers are nonmonetary. Monetary systems are
                                 16
       insufficient motivators, in part because expectations often exceed
       results and because disparity between salaried individuals may divide
       rather than unite employees. Proven nonmonetary positive motivators
       foster team spirit and include recognition, responsibility, and
       advancement. Managers, who recognize the "small wins" of
       employees, promote participatory environments, and treat employees
       with fairness and respect will find their employees to be more highly
       motivated. One company's managers brainstormed to come up with 30
       powerful rewards that cost little or nothing to implement. The most
       effective rewards, such as letters of commendation and time off from
       work, enhanced personal fulfillment and self- respect. Over the longer
       term, sincere praise and personal gestures are far more effective and
       more economical than awards of money alone. In the end, a program
       that combines monetary reward systems and satisfies intrinsic, self-
       actualizing needs may be the most potent employee motivator.
A drop in staff motivation can become contagious if the cause is not identified
and addressed. Management needs to be conscious of employee motivation,
and that means being able to identify the factors that cause a lack of
motivation in the workplace. Become familiar with the factors that can
degrade staff motivation and design plans to combat these productivity killers.
Rumors
The important thing to remember about rumors is that they are not always
wrong. Some rumors have basis in fact, but that does not make them good for
employee morale. An employee that hears a rumor that she may be laid off
experiences an instant drop in motivation. To deal with the problem of rumors
                                      17
in the workplace, it is important for management to share important
information with the staff in a timely manner. This helps employees to feel
confident that management will address rumors and encourages staff members
to wait on information from the company before acting on a rumor.
Employees are motivated to succeed at jobs for which they feel prepared and
properly trained. Before moving an employee into a position of greater
responsibility or before allowing any changes to an employee's job duties, be
certain that employee has had the training needed to get started. Putting an
employee in a position where she feels she has inadequate job skills will erode
the employee's confidence and stifle any motivation to succeed.
Goal Flaws
Employees are not motivated by the notion that their hard work will make
company owners and executives rich, the more internalized a company's goals
sound, the less motivated employees are to fulfill those goals. The company
needs to focus on the customer and give employees a chance to feel as though
it has done something substantial to help the customer. For example, develop
a referral program that encourages customers that have recently purchased
products to recommend other people that your sales professionals can call on.
The company and sales staff benefit from the increase in business, but the
sales staff also gets to see the appreciation of past clients in the form of
potential new business.
Overwork
                                      18
personal life. Make sure the staff schedule still allows employees to spend
time with their families and get away from the stress of working too much.
Here are some motivations techniques that will help to get staff re-energised
and engaged at work. To begin with, make sure you have the right conditions
in place so that your work culture supports motivation.
√ Career opportunities
So what can you do to make sure that employees are switched on at work?
Here are some practical motivation techniques that you can use to improve
motivation in your workplace:
                                      19
1. Treat Employees as Individuals
Do you make assumptions about what motivates your employees? Some are
likely to be career focused, but others may see their work as a place to make
friends and earn money.Find out what motivates employees outside of work.
Some enjoy a challenge such as a sporting activity; others may like to be on
committees so they can use their organizational skills. Use their innate talents
in the workplace where possible to keep them motivated. Set goals which
stretch their abilities. Make goals SMART - specific, measurable, achievable,
relevant and time framed.
Get to know your employees on a personal level, and offer support when
needed, even if it is only to listen to their concerns. Ask your employees for
their opinions where possible, for example if you are changing systems or
introducing new equipment. Being involved in decision making is one of the
best motivation techniques. Catch your employees doing something well and
praise them - and if you do this in front of others, it makes the employee feel
even better. Giving employees recognition for their efforts will motivate them
to repeat the process.
Having fun is one of the best motivation techniques. And small things
can make all the difference..
√ asking the employees for their opinion on what would make the workplace a
fun place!
Morale Boosters
Measuring Morale
There's only one way to know how good morale really is in your company:
ask the people who work there.
Morale took a real beating this fall. But there's nothing that lifts the spirits
like some friendly competition.
CEOs offer 10 tips for leading your company through bleak times.
Non-Cash Incentives
The hectic holiday season is the time to show off a well- thought-out reward
strategy that helps your workforce stay motivated and focused.
In this classic Inc. article, take a look at some unique employee benefits that
can help you create an environment your workers won't want to leave.
Motivation by Compensation
                                      22
Trust but Verify In addition to providing valuable information on the
company's 20 restaurants, the Noodles & Co. secret shopper program is used
as a motivational tool.
This CEO learned a valuable lesson during his past life as a steelworker: A
company should compensate its sales force based on fair and reachable short-
term goals.
Are your workers not in the habit of showing up every day? Try instituting a
bonus system to encourage perfect attendance.
Take a regular bonus plan and add a kicker—an increase in the payout if
certain targets are met.
                                      23
 1.1.9         Theories of Motivation
In other words, you have certain needs or wants (these terms will be used
interchangeably), and this causes you to do certain things (behavior), which
satisfy those needs (satisfaction), and this can then change which needs/wants
are primary (either intensifying certain ones, or allowing you to move on to
other ones).
                                        24
1.2 COMPANY PROFILE
                      25
1.3 PROBLEM STATEMENT
There is the more need to research on motivation, goal is that what employees is
to perform at their best and achieve the objects or not in a specific time. In this
the problem is that many of the employers who don’t work for everyone have
struggled for different incentive programs to motivate their employee. This is
the problem which is faced by the many employees of that company.
Why the incentives not for everyone why only for employees?
Why the bank not introducing the new products, bank boost the
development of product and increase the range of facilities so that the rate
of interest increase on various product?
                                          26
1.4 SCOPE OF STUDY
                                      27
1.5OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
                                       28
1.6NEED FOR STUDY
                                    29
                                   CHAPTER 2
                      RESEARCH METHDOLOGY
2.1 REVIEW OF LITRATURE
Thus the study is an attempt to explore various factor which can affect industrial
development especially related to employee motivation which can be helpful to all
those and especially industrial social workers to find out effective measures and
solution to deal with the loopholes and obstacles in gaining effective work.
                           NEXGEN CAREER
SAMPLING METHOD
Researcher has selected respondents randomly that is why simple random sampling
method is used.
SAMPLE SIZE
RESEARCH DESIGN
VARIABLES
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION
Specter (1997) defines employee motivation simply as “the degree to which people like
their jobs.”
                                           31
2.3 RESEARCH METHOLOGY
In this section I will describe and explain the concepts, models and theories that are relevant
in the field of motivation and necessary to facilitate a comprehensive analysis and
Understanding of the research question .It may be useful to conceptualize the term financial
Motivation and what its concepts are. A broader definition of motivation will be introduced.
It can be observed from the above definitions that, motivation in general, is more or
less basically concern with factors or events that moves, leads, and drives certain human
action or Inaction over a given period of time given the prevailing conditions.
Furthermore the definitions suggest st that there need to be an” invisible force” to push
people to do something in return. It could also be deduced from the definition that
having a motivated work force or creating an environment in which high levels of
motivation are maintained remains challenge for today’s management. This challenge
may emanate from the simple fact that motivation is not a fixed trait –as it could change
with changes in personal, psychological, financial orsocial factors. For this thesis, the
definition of motivation by Greenberg & Baron (2003) is adopted, as it is more realistic
and simple as it considers the individual and his performance. Greenberg&Baron
defines motivation as:
 “The set of processes that arouse, direct, and maintain human behavior towards
attaining some goal”. (Greenberg &Baron, 2003, p190) Bassett-Jones &Lloyd (2005,
p931) presents that two views of human nature underlay early research into employee
motivation. The first view focuses on Taylorism, which viewed people as basically lazy
and work –shy”, and thus held that these set of employees can only be motivated by
external stimulation. The second view was based on Hawthorn findings, which held the
view that employees are motivated to work well for “its own sake” as well as for the
social and monetary benefits this type of motivation according to this school was
internally motivated.
                                              32
Motivation theories
   Even though much research been conducted on the field of financial motivation and
many researchers and writers have proposed theories on the concept of financial
motivation, and its role in enhancing employee’s performance in every organization
some of these models have been widely used and accepted by today’s organizations
leaders. In this thesis discussion on some of the motivational theories will include
Alders (ERG theory), Maslow (Need theory), Vrooms (Expectancy theory), Adams
(Social equity theory), Taylor (productivity theory), Herzberg (Two factor theory), Mac
Gregory (theory X and Y), Geog pales (path goal theory) and skinner (Reward theory).
To better understand this discussion a summary of the theories is presented and an
indebt discussion on Maslow and ERG theories on which I base my thesis overlooked.
  Alder asserts in his Existence relatedness and growth theory commonly known as the
ERG theory that there are three basic human needs: Existence, relatedness and growth,
which must be meet by an employee to enable him, increase performance. Maslow
(1943) suggests that human needs can be classified into five categories and that these
categories can be arranged in a hierarchy of importance. These include physiological,
security, belongings, esteem and self-actualization needs. According to him a person is
motivated first and foremost to satisfy physiological needs. As long as the employees
remain unsatisfied, they turn to be motivated only to fulfill them. When physiological
needs are satisfied they cease to act as primary motivational factors and the individual
moves “up” the hierarchy and seek to satisfy security needs. This process continues
untfinallyselfactualisation needs are satisfied. According to Maslow the rationale is
quite simple because employees’ who are too hungry or too ill to work will hardly be
able to make much a contribution to productivity hence difficulties in meeting
organizational goals. Vroom (1964) proposes that people are motivated by how much
they want something and how likely they think they are to get it he suggest that
                                           33
motivation leads to efforts and the efforts combined with employees ability together
with environment factors which interplay’s resulting to performance. This performance
interns lead to various outcomes, each of which has an associated value called Valence.
     Adams (1965) on his part suggests that people are motivated to seek social equity
in the Rewards they receive for high performance. According to him the outcome from
job includes; pay, recognition, promotion, social relationship and intrinsic reward .to get
these rewards various inputs needs to be employed by the employees to the job as time,
experience, efforts, education and loyalty. He suggests that, people tend to view their
outcomes and inputs as aratio and then compare these ratios with others and turn to
become motivated if this ratio is high. Taylor (1911) observed the soldering by
employees, which is a situation whereby workers work less than full capacity. He
argued that soldering occurs due to the fact employee’s fear that performing high will
lead to increasing productivity, which might cause them to lose their jobs. This slow
paces of work where promoted by faulty systems however this situation is not what
prevails with contemporary employees who organizations evaluate them through their
performance.
Herzberg suggested that there are factors in a job, which causes satis faction. These he
called Intrinsic factors (motivators) and other factor he refers to as dissatisfies (hygiene
factors). According to him if the motivational factors are met, the employee becomes
motivated and hence performs higher. Mac Gregory suggested that there exist two sets
of employees (lazy and ambitious employees) with lazy employees representing theory
X, hard and ambitious workers representing Y. According to him the lazy employee
should be motivated to increase performance in an organization Geog opalaus path Goal
theory of motivation states that, if a worker sees high productivity as a path leading to
the attainment of one or more of his personal goals, he will turn to be a high Producer.
But if he sees low productivity as the path leading to the attainment of his goal he will
turn to be a low producer and hence needs to be motivated.
This discussion on the above motivational theories explains the fact that the concept of
Employee’s motivation has been a critical factor addressed by previous aut hors as what
                                          34
determines the core competence of every organization in achieving a competitive
position. Skinner who propounded that any behavior that is rewarded tends to be
repeated supported This view. The term motivation has been used in numerous and
often contradictory ways. Presently there appears to be some agreements that the crucial
thread that distinguishes employee’s Motivated behaviors’ from other behavior is that it
is goal directed behavior, Bindra (2000 P223) argues that the core of motivating
individuals lays in the goal-directaspectofbehaviour.Jones suggested “motivation is
concern with how behavior gets started, is energized, is Sustained, is directed, is
stopped and what kind of subjective re-action is present in the organization while this is
going on. The Jones statement can be converted into a diagram Which shows the
employee motivational process as it influences performance.
          To fulfill or need
      Fulfillment and
 Re-definition of needs
 Goal directed
 Behavior
(2004,p382) the process generated during this period, makes this period referred to as
“the golden age of work motivation theories”. “Never before and, some would argue,
never since has so much progress been made in Explicating the aetiology of work
motivation” (steers et al., 2004, pp380-383)
                                           35
Bassett-Jones & Lloyd (2005,p 932) suggests that the “content theorists led by
Herzberg, assumed a more complex interaction between both internal and external
factors, and explored the circumstances in which individuals respond to different
internal and external stimuli. On the other hand, process theory, where victor Vroom
was the first exponent considers how factors internal to the person result in different
behaviours. From the focus point of these two groups, one could observe that the
process theories attempt or try to understand the thinking processes an individual might
go through in determining how to behave in a workplace. The primary focus was on
how and why questions of motivation,how a certain behaviour starts, developed and
sustained over time.It is true that human behaviour in general is dynamic and could
affect the individual’spersonal altitude as well as factors surrounding that individual.
These exogenous factors eminent from the environment in which the individual operates
generate stimuli to employees.
It is my belief that employees in general are goal seeking and look for challenges and
expect Positive re-enforcement at all times. Hence it could only be of benefit if
organizations could provide these rewards and factors. Though I have discussed earlier
in this thesis that employees are financially motivated, motivation could be seen as a
moving target, as what Motivates differs among different people. And may even change
for the same person over a given period of time, developments within the modern
organization has probably made Motivating employees ever more difficult due to the
nature of every individual, behavior increasing the complexity of what can really
motivate employees. According to Bassette-jones & Lloyd (2005,p.932) “expectancy,
equity, goal setting and reinforcement theory have resulted in the development of a
simple model of motivational alignment. The model suggest that once needs of
employees are identified, and organizational objectives and also satisfy employee needs
.If poorly aligned, then low motivation will be the Outcome”.
According to (Wiley, 1997,p264) “modern approaches to motivation may be organised
into three related clusters: (1) personality-based views (2) cognitive choice or decision
approaches and (3) goal or self- regulation perspective; where personality-based views
emphasize the influence of enduring personal characteristics as they affect goal choice
and striving. Workplace behavior is posited to be determined by persons current need
                                           36
state in certain Universal need category. Cognitive choice approaches to work
motivation emphasize two determinant of choice and action; expectations, and
subjective valuation of the consequences associated with each alternative. These
expectancy value theories are intended to predict an individual choice or decision. Goal
framework to work motivation emphasis the factors that influence goal striving which
focuses on the relationship between goals and work behavior.
The assumption is that an employee’s conscious intentions (goals) are primary
determines of Task-related motivation since goals directs their thoughts and action”.
It is worth noting that an in-depth review of all the different theories mentioned above,
is beyond the scope of this thesis. However, the personality-based perspective of work
motivation within which Maslow need theory of motivation and Alders ERG theory
falls will provide the main support and serve as a foundation for the research reported in
this thesis. Specifically, as organizational scholars have paid a great deal of attention to
the idea that people are motivated to use their jobs as mechanisms for satisfying their
needs. This thesis intend to use Maslow’s hierarchy of need theory of motivation as a
foundation to identify the factors that motivate today’s employees, and in the process
determine a ranking order of factors that motivates these employees, the original
Maslow theory will be looked at more detail hereof.
                                            37
Specifically Maslow theorized that people have five types of needs and that these are
activated in a hierarchical manner. This means that these needs are aroused in a specific
order from lowest to highest, such that the lowest-order need must be fulfilled before
the next order need is triggered and the process continues. If you look t this in a
motivational point of vie Maslow’s theory says that a need can never be fully met, but a
need that is almost fulfilled does not longer motivate. According to Maslow you need to
know where a person is on the Hierarchical pyramid in order to motivate him/her. Then
you need to focus on meeting that person’s needs at that level (Robbins 2001)According
to Greenberg and Baron (2003,p192) the five needs identified by Maslow corresponds
with the three needs of Alderfers ERG theory. Where as Maslow theory specifies that
the needs be activated in order from lowest to highest Alder’s theory specifies that the
needs can be activated in any order. His approach is much simpler than Maslows. Alder
specifies that there exist three main needs as opposed to five postulated by Maslow.
This human basic needs include existence, relatedness and growth. These needs
according to Alder need not necessarily activated in any specific order and may be
activated at any time. According to him Existence needs corresponds to Maslow’s
physiological needs and safety needs. Relatedness needs corresponds to Maslow’s
social needs and growth needs corresponds to esteem and self-actualization needs by
Maslow Below is a summary of these needs that in this thesis are divided into
Deficiency needs (Psychological, safety, social needs) and Growth needs (es teem, self-
actualization needs). Factors Explanation
  Physiological needs are the need at the bottom of the triangle and include the lowest
order need and most basic. This includes the need to satisfy the fundamental biological
drives such as food, air, water and shelter. According to Maslow organizations must
provide employees with a salary that enable them to afford adequate living conditions.
The rationale here is that any hungry employee will hardly be able to make much of any
contribution to his organization.
Safety needs this occupies the second level of needs. Safety needs are activated after
 Physiological needs are met. They refer to the need for a secure working environment
                                           38
free from any threats or harms. Organizations can provide these need by providing
employees with safety working equipment e.g. hardhats, health insurance plans, fire
protection etc. The rationale is that employees working in an environment free of harm
do their jobs Without fear of harm.
  Social needs: This represents the third level of needs. They are activated after safety
needs are met. Social needs refer to the need to be affiliated that is (the needed to be
loved and accepted by other people). To meet these needs organisations encourage
employees Participation in social events such as picnics, organisations bowling etc
  Esteem needs this represents the fourth level of needs. It includes the need for self-
respect and approval of others. Organisations introduce awards banquets to recognize
distinguished achievements
  Self-actualization: This occupies the last level at the top of the triangle. This refers to
the need to become all that one is capable of being to develop ones fullest potential. The
rationale here holds to the point that self-actualised employees represent valuable assets
to the organization human resource. Most research on the application of need theory
found that although lower- level managers are able to satisfy only their deficiency needs
on the jobs, managers at the top level of Organizations are able to satisfy both their
deficiency and growth needs (Greenberg &Baron 2003 p.194) this view was supported
by Shipley & Kelly (1988, p.18) Shipley & Kelly (1988, p.18) argue that as “need
satisfaction is an attitude, and that it imperfectly possible for a worker to be satisfied
with his/her need, but not be motivated the Reverse of which holds equally true. Hence,
need satisfaction and motivation are not synonymous and both need fulfillment and un-
fulfillment can have negative as well as positive influence on motivation
                                            39
Organizational /managerial Applications of Maslow’s Need theory
The greatest value of Maslow’s need theory lies in the practical implications it has for
every Management of organizations (Greenberg & Baron 2003 p.195). The rationale
behind the theory lies on the fact that it’s able to suggest to managers how they can
make their employees or subordinates become self-actualized. This is because self-
actualized employees are likely to work at their maximum creative potentials. Therefore
it is important to make employees meet this stage by helping meet their need
organizations can take the following Strategies to attain this stage
                                            40
   Promote a healthy work force: Companies can help in keeping their Employees
physiological needs by providing incentives to keep them healthy both in health and
mentally. In a research carried out at the Hershey Foods Corporation and Southern
California Edison Company showed that Employees are provided with insurance
rebates with health lifestyles while extra premiums were given to those with risk habits
like smoking.
Maslow proposed that if people grew up in an environment in which their needs are not
meet, they would be unlikely to function healthy, well- adjusted individuals. Research
testing Maslow’s theory has supported the distinction between the deficiencies and
growth needs but Showed that not all people are able to satisfy their higher-order needs
on the job. According the results of the research managers from higher echelons of
organizations are able to satisfy both their growth and deficiency needs lower level
managers are able to satisfy only their deficiency needs on the job. Maslow’s theory has
not received a great deal of support with respect to specific notion it proposes
(Greenberg &Baron 2003, p195). To them this model is theorized to be especially
effective in describing the behavior of individuals who are high ingrowths need strength
because employees who are different to the idea of increasing their growth will not
realize any physiological reaction to their jobs. Centers & Bengal (1966, .193) in their
carried out among a cross-section of the Working population in Los Angeles, posited
survey “background factors, altitudes and aspirations affects workers needs,
expectations and situation assessment”. According to Graham &Messner (1998, p.196)
there are generally three major criticisms directed to the need theory and other content
theories of motivation. (A) There is scant empirical data to support their conclusions,
(b) they assume employees are basically alike, and (c) they are not theories of
motivation at all, but rather theories of job satisfaction. This was supported by the views
of Nadler & Lawler (1979) in Graham &Messner (2000, p 188). Nadler & Lawler
(1979) cited in Graham & Messner (2000, p.198) where also critical of theneed theory
                                            41
of motivation. They argue that the theory makes the following unrealistic assumptions
about employees in general that: (a) all employees are alike (b) all situations area like
and that (c) there is only one best way to meet needs. Another critic to this view was
Basset-Jones & Lloyd (2004, p 961). Basset-Jones & Lloyd (2004, p 961) presents that
in general, critics of the need theory argue that it is as a result of the natural feeling of
employees to take credit for needs met and dissatisfaction on needs not me t.
Nonetheless and regardless of the heavy criticism levied at the hierarchy of need theory,
I Believe that this theory has a made a significant contribution in the field of
organizational behavior and management especially in the area of employee motivation
and remains attractive to both researchers and managers alike. The incorporation of the
need theory into the work environment today could be as a result of the contributions
made so far by Maslows Hierarchy of need theory.
If any person has to come up with the question that is there any need for employees
motivation? The answer to this type of question of-course should be simple-the basic
survival of every organization be it public or private limited before, today and in the
foreseeable future lies in how well its work force is motivated to meet the objectives of
the organization. This explains why the human resource department in today’s
organization is became a focus of its core functions. I think that motivated employees
are needed in this rapidly Business world where the principal-agent conflict is the issue
confronting most managers. Most organizations now consider their human resources as
their most valuable assets (a strategic or competitive advantage). Therefore, in order to
effectively and efficiently utilize this strategic asset, I believe managers and the
organization as a whole, must be able and willing to understand and hopefully provide
the factors that motivate its employees within the context of the roles and duties they
perform. This is because highly motivated employees are the cause of high productivity
levels and hence higher profits for the organization. Having noted this rationale the next
question one may ask are what factors motivated today’s employees”?
                                             42
  According to Wiley (1997, p265) at some point during our lives, virtually every
person may have to work. He claims that working is such a common phenomenon that
the question “what Motivates people to work is seldom asked. Wiley went on to say that
“we are much more Likely to wonder why people climb mountains or commit suicide
than to question the motivational basis of their work”,. Therefore, exploring the
altitudes that employees hold concerning factors that motivate them to work is
important to creating an environment that encourages employee motivation. From the
much amount of literature available on employee motivation, it is clearly evident that a
lot of surveys regarding employees and what motivates them have been undertaking.
These employee motivation surveys have been conducted in many different job
situations, among different categories of employees using different research methods
and applications. One of the very first survey to be conducted was on industrial workers
by (Hershey & Blanchard, 1969) over the years, similar or different survey employees
have been carried out see (Kovach, 1987, 1993) (Wiley, 1995), (Lindner, 1998, 1999)
According to a research carried out by Kovach on industrial employees who were asked
to rank ten “job rewards” factors based on personal preferences where the value 1
represented most preferred and 10 being the least preferred. The results were as follows
(1) full Appreciation of work done (2) feeling of being (3) sympathetic help with
personal problems(4) Job security (5) Good wages and salaries (6) interesting work (7)
promotion & Growth (8)employee’s loyalty (9) Good working conditions (10) tactful
discipline During the periods of (1946, 1981 & 1986) when employee surveys were
carried out, Supervisors were at the time asked to rank job rewards, as they taught
employees would rank them. The rankings by the supervisors were relatively consistent
for each of the years. These rankings were as follows: (1) Good wages (2) Job security
(3) promotion and Growth (4)working conditions (5) interesting work (6) personal
loyalty to employees (7) tact ful discipline (8) full appreciation (9) sympathetic help
with personal problems (10) recognition
(Kovach 1987 p.49-54) The results from the supervisor survey indicated that their
ranking had not changed over the Study period with regards their collective perception
of factors that motivate employees. This shows that they had a very inaccurate
perception of what motivates employees but also that they did not realise the
importance
  of the need theory In a survey by Wiley (1997, p.278) in which approximately 550
                                          43
questionnaires were Administered to person employed at different industries and
divided into 5 subgroups, or Categories namely: (occupation, gender, income levels,
employment status and age) they were asked to rank 10 factors according to the level of
importance each is in motivating them to perform best with the most important factor
ranked 1 and the least important ranked 10t h. The survey concluded with the following
collective rank order by respondents: (1) Good wages (2) full appreciation of work done
(3) job security (4) promotion (5) interesting work (6) company loyalty to employees
(7) Good working conditions (8) tactful discipline (9)recognition (10) sympathetic help
with personal problems
The results from a representative sample of the labour force in seven different countries
by Harpaz (1991 p.75) showed that the two most dominant work goals were “interesting
work “and Good wages”; He further concluded that these two factors were consistent
across different Organizational levels, between genders and age groups.Quinn (1997)
also cited in Harpaz (1991 p.311) concluded, “When the ratings of twenty three job
related factors (including the need factors) were carried out, the conclusion reached was
that no single factor was pre-eminently important”. He further pointed out that, “The
most aspect of the worker job was that of sufficient resources to perform a task. From
the above studies presented so far, the rankings by different subgroups have shown
semantic differences in the importance placed on different motivational factors. For
example (Kovach, 1987, Wiley, 1997 and Harpaz, 1990) .The discrepancies in these
research findings supports Nelsons (2001, p.2) positional view that “what motivates
employees differs and may change for the same employee over time”. It is appropriate
at this level to give a brief summary of the previous researches in this thesis. Even
though the original need hierarchy theory was presented some 50 years ago, some of its
if not all factors remain of significant importance to employees today. The large number
of earlier and recent studies investigating employee motivation using sometimes the
original or modified version of Maslow’s theory, may continue the appreciation of this
theory and the issue of employee motivation. The literature also shows that where the
original theory was lacking (short comings or criticised for), has been greatly taken into
consideration.
                                           44
Researchers have taken issues such as differences in gender, age, income, culture &
countries etc and how these may affect or influence employee work motivation
extensively. The commonality between these previous researches is the agreement that
certain factors are more important as motivational factors than others and that these
factors may change from one employee to another. These previous studies have also
been taken using different methods, from surveys, questionnaires, face- face interviews,
but their outcomes have not differed significantly. A possible explanation could be due
to the fact that even.
                                          45
2.3LIMITATION OF THE SUTDY
Time constraint was one of the limitations during the data collection.
Responses received were not free from respondent biases because of their apprehension
that it might affect their career
                                          46
                                  CHAPTER 3
       RESULTS, DISCUSSIONS, AND CONCLUSION
Male 31 77.5
Female 9 22.5
Gender
23%
                                                                       male
                                                                       female
77%
                                           47
Above table shows that 77% percent (n=31) respondent belongs to a male-group of
percent 23% (n=9)
18 to 25 years 8 20
26 to 35 years 15 37.5
36 to 45 years 11 27.5
Above 45 years 6 15
Total 40 100
                                        48
                           percentage of age
                     15%
                                       20%
                                                                18 to 25 years
                                                                26 to 35 years
                                                                36 to 45 years
            27.5%
                                                                Above 45 years
37.5%
Above table shows that 20% percent (n=08) respondent belongs to age-group of
18 -25, 37.5% percent (n=15) belongs to age-group of 26-35, 27.5% percent
(n=11) belongs to age-group of 36-45 while 15% percent (n=6) belongs to age-
group of above 45 years.
S.S.S 18 45%
H.S.C 6 15%
Graduate 10 25%
                                  49
                 Other                        5                  12.5%
Total 40 100%
Education
               2.5%         13%
                                                                   S.S.S
                                         45%                       H.S.C
                                                                   Graduate
                  22.5%
                                                                   Post Graduate
                                                                       Other
                              15%
       Above table shows that 45% percent (n=18) respondent had their educational
qualification up to primary level, 15% percent (n=6) respondent had their educational
qualification up to secondary level, 22.5% percent (n=10) respondent had their
educational qualification up to higher secondary level, 12.5%percent (n=5) respondent
had their educational qualification up to graduation level while 05% percent (n=2)
respondent had their educational qualification up to post graduate level.
Table no- 5.4 Table shows the work of span of the respondent.
1 – 5 years 14 35%
                                           50
           6 – 10 years                12            30%
11 – 15 years 9 22.5%
Total 40 100%
14%
35% 1 – 5 years
               23%                                                6 – 10 years
                                                                  11 – 15 years
                                                                  Above 15 years
30%
      Above table shows that 35% percent (n=14) respondent belongs to age-group of
      1 – 5years, 30% percent (n=12) belongs to age-group of 6 – 10 years, 22.5%
      percent (n=9) belongs to age-group of 11 – 15 years, while 12.5% percent (n=5)
      belongs to age-group of above 15 years.
Table no- 5.5 Table shows present salary and incriment of the respondent.
                                            51
                     Agree                   27                67.5%
Uncertain 3 7.5%
Disagree 4 10%
Strongly disagree 2 5%
Total 40 100%
                               5%
                                    10%
                        10%
                                                                Strongly agree
                   8%                                           Agree
                                                                Uncertain
                                                                Disagree
                                                                Strongly disagree
                                      67%
Above table shows that 10% percent (n=4) respondent with strongly agree, 67.5%
percent (n=27) respondent with agree, 7.5% percent (n=3) respondent with
uncertain,10% percent (n=4) respondent with disagree,5% percent (n=2)
respondent with strongly agree.
                                            52
             Employee response        Frequency       Percentage (%)
Strongly agree 2 5%
Agree 22 55%
Uncertain 5 12.5%
Disagree 8 20%
Total 40 100%
                              8% 5%
                                                               Strongly agree
                    20%                                        Agree
                                                               Uncertain
                                                               Disagree
                     12%               55%
                                                               Strongly disagree
 Above table shows that 5% percent (n=2) respondent with strongly agree,
55%percent (n=22) respondent with agree, 12.5%percent (n=5) respondent with
uncertain,20% percent (n=8) respondent with disagree,7.5% percent (n=3) respondent
with strongly disagree.
                                         53
Table no- 5.7 Table shows working conditions are clean,pleasant & safe of
respondent.
Uncertain 0 0%
Disagree 5 5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 40 100%
Above table shows that 67.5% percent (n=27) respondent with strongly agree,
27.5%percent (n=11) respondent with agree, 0%percent (n=0) respondent with
uncertain,5% percent (n=2) respondent with disagree,0% percent (n=0) respondent
with strongly disagree.
                                            54
Table no-5.8 Table shows welfare facilities provided by the company.
Agree 25 62.5%
Uncertain 1 2.5%
Disagree 3 7.5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 40 100%
                                 55
Above table shows that 27.5% percent (n=11) respondent with strongly agree,
62.5%percent (n=25) respondent with agree, 2.5%percent (n=1) respondent with
uncertain,7.5% percent (n=3) respondent with disagree,0% percent (n=0)
respondent with strongly disagree.
Agree 22 55%
Uncertain 3 7.5%
Disagree 5 12.5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
total 40 100%
                           13%
                                       25%                      Strongly agree
                  7%
                                                                Agree
                                                                Uncertain
                                                                Disagree
                                                                Strongly disagree
                           55%
                                         56
Above table shows that 25% percent (n=10) respondent with strongly agree,
55%percent (n=22) respondent with agree, 7.5%percent (n=3) respondent with
uncertain,12.5% percent (n=5) respondent with disagree,0% percent) respondents
with strongly disagree.
 Table no 5.10 Table shows relation with my superior peer and subordinates of
Respondent.
Agree 6 15%
Uncertain 0 0%
Disagree 0 0%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
total 40 100%
                                         57
               policies and procedures of respondent
                         0% 0% 0%
                          15%
                                                                Strongly agree
                                                                Agree
                                                                Uncertain
                                                                Disagree
                                                                Strongly disagree
                                         85%
Above table shows that 85% percent (n=34) respondent with strongly agree,
15%percent (n=6) respondent with agree, 0%percent uncertain, disagree,
strongly disagree.
Table no 5.11 Table shows supervisor take interest in our problem, well
being future
Agree 30 75.5%
Uncertain 3 7%
Disagree 0 0%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
total 40 100%
                                               58
          superviser take intrest in our problem, well
                         being future
                              0% 0%
                              8%
                                       17%
                                                                   Strongly agree
                                                                   Agree
                                                                   Uncertain
                                                                   Disagree
                                                                   Strongly disagree
                           75%
Above table shows that17% percent (n=7) respondent with strongly agree,
75%percent (n=35) respondent with agree, 8%percent (n=3) respondent with
uncertain, 0%percent , disagree, strongly disagree.
Agree 29 72.5%
Uncertain 04 10%
Disagree 02 05%
Strongly disagree 0 0
Total 40 100%
                                             59
              setting and achieving challenging goal
                                   0%
                               5%
                                        12%
                        10%
                                                                       Strongly agree
                                                                       Agree
                                                                       Uncertain
                                                                       Disagree
                                                                       Strongly disagree
73%
Above table shows that 12% percent (n=5) respondent with strongly agree, 73%percent
(n=29) respondent with agree, 10%percent (n=4) respondent with uncertain5% percent
(n=2) respondent with disagree,0% percent) respondents with strongly disagree.
Table no 5.13 Table shows recognized and praised for my good performance
Agree 25 62.5%
Uncertain 03 7.5%
Disagree 07 17.5%
Strongly disagree 0 0
                                              60
                           total                      40             100%
                                          12%
                           17%
                                                                       Strongly agree
                                                                       Agree
                    8%
                                                                       Uncertain
                                                                       Disagree
                                                                       Strongly disagree
                                          63%
Above table shows that 12% percent (n=5) respondent with strongly agree, 62%percent
(n=25) respondent with agree, 8%percent (n=3) respondent with uncertain18% percent
(n=7) respondent with disagree,0% percent) respondents with strongly disagree.
Table no 5.17 Table show organization helps me in all possible way to know my
Agree 28 70%
Uncertain 1 2.5%
Disagree 03 7.5%
                                                61
                   Strongly disagree              0                 0%
Total 40 100%
Above table shows that 20% percent (n=8) respondent with strongly agree, 70%percent
(n=28) respondent with agree, 2.5%percent (n=1) respondent with uncertain7.5%
                                             62
percent (n=3) respondent with disagree,0% percent(n=0) respondents with
strongly disagree.
Table no 5.18 Table show organization we are a given a chance to our present our
ideas & the same is give due weight age in decision making
Strongly agree 0 0%
Agree 22 55%
Uncertain 0 0%
Disagree 10 25%
Total 40 100%
                                         63
organization we are a given a chance to our present our
  ideas & the same is give due weight age in decision
                        making
                                   0%
0%
            Above table shows that 0% percent (n=0) respondent with strongly agree,
55%percent (n=22) respondent with agree, 0%percent (n=0) respondent with
uncertain25% percent (n=10) respondent with disagree, 20% percent (n=8)
respondents with strongly disagree.
Table no 5.19 Table show management of our calls for active participation of the
employee in the dat to day function of the organization
Agree 25 62.5%
Uncertain 5 12.5%
Disagree 0 0%
                                          64
                   Strongly disagree              0                  0%
Total 40 100%
                            12%
                                         25%                          Strongly agree
                                                                      Agree
                                                                      Uncertain
                                                                      Disagree
                                                                      Strongly disagree
                            63%
Above table shows that 25% percent (n=10) respondent with strongly agree,
62%percent (n=25) respondent with agree, 13%percent (n=5) respondent with
                                           65
uncertain0% percent (n=0) respondent with disagree, 0% percent (n=0)
respondents with strongly disagree.
Agree 36 90%
Uncertain 0 0%
Disagree 0 0%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 40 100%
                                         66
                prestige of my organization outside
                          company is good
                           0% 0% 0%
                                      10%
                                                                       Strongly agree
                                                                       Agree
                                                                       Uncertain
                                                                       Disagree
                                                                       Strongly disagree
                           90%
Above table shows that10 % percent (n=4) respondent with strongly agree, 90%percent
(n=36) respondent with agree, 0%percent (n=0) respondent with uncertain0% percent
(n=0) respondent with disagree, 0% percent (n=0) respondents with strongly disagree.
Agree 7 17.5%
Uncertain 0 0%
Disagree 5 12.5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
                                            67
                         Total                  40               100%
Strongly agree
                                                                   Agree
                   19%
                                                                   Uncertain
                                                                   Disagree
                                         70%                       Strongly disagree
Above table shows that70 % percent (n=28) respondent with strongly agree,
17%percent (n=7) respondent with agree, 0%percent (n=0) respondent with
                                         68
uncertain12.5% percent (n=5) respondent with disagree, 0% percent (n=0)
respondents with strongly disagree.
Table no 5.22 Table shows added authority and responsibility to present job will be
more interesting and rewarding
Agree 22 55%
Uncertain 05 12.5%
Disagree 03 7.5%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 40 100%
                                         69
                   added authority and responsibility to
                  present job will be more interesting and
                                 rewarding
                                    0%
                                8%
                                                                   Strongly agree
                        12%              25%
                                                                   Agree
                                                                   Uncertain
                                                                   Disagree
                                                                   Strongly disagree
                              55%
   Above table shows that25 % percent (n=10) respondent with strongly agree,
55%percent (n=22) respondent with agree, 12.5%percent (n=5) respondent with
uncertain7.5% percent (n=5) respondent with disagree, 0% percent (n=0)
respondents with strongly disagree
Agree 25 62.5%
Uncertain 0 0%
Disagree 05 12.5%
                                               70
                        Total                         40           100%
                                8%
                                           17%
                       12%                                           Strongly agree
                 0%                                                  Agree
                                                                     Uncertain
                                                                     Disagree
                                                                     Strongly disagree
                                     63%
   Above table shows that17 % percent (n=7) respondent with strongly agree,
62%percent (n=25) respondent with agree, 0%percent (n=0) respondent with
                                                 71
uncertain13% percent (n=5) respondent with disagree, 8% percent (n=3)
respondents with strongly disagree
Table no 5.24 Table shows job contet and responsibilities are appropriate
Agree 25 62.5%
Uncertain 2 5%
Disagree 04 10%
Strongly disagree 02 5%
Total 40 100%
                                         72
                job contet and responsibilities are
                           appropriate
                               5%
                                       17%
                         10%
                                                                  Strongly agree
                    5%
                                                                  Agree
                                                                  Uncertain
                                                                  Disagree
                                                                  Strongly disagree
                                     63%
      Above table shows that17 % percent (n=7) respondent with strongly agree,
62%percent (n=25) respondent with agree, 5%percent (n=2) respondent with
uncertain10% percent (n=4) respondent with disagree, 5% percent (n=2)
respondents with strongly disagree
Table no 5.25 Table shows organization tries to make the job more challenging which
prevents us from getting bored on the job
Agree 23 57.5%
Uncertain 3 7.5%
                                             73
                         Disagree                    04            10%
Strongly disagree 02 5%
Total 40 100%
                                  5%
                            10%           20%                      Strongly agree
                       8%                                          Agree
                                                                   Uncertain
                                                                   Disagree
                                                                   Strongly disagree
                                    58%
      Above table shows that20 % percent (n=8) respondent with strongly agree,
57%percent (n=23) respondent with agree, 8%percent (n=3) respondent with
uncertain10% percent (n=4) respondent with disagree, 5% percent (n=2)
respondents with strongly disagree
                                                74
Table no 5.26 Table shows appropriate work is given to me according to my skill and
potential
Agree 20 50%
Uncertain 2 5%
Disagree 8 20%
Total 40 100%
                                        75
          Appropriate work is given to me according
                  to my skill and potential
                               15%    10%
                                                                   Strongly agree
                                                                   Agree
                    20%                                            Uncertain
                                                                   Disagree
                                            50%                    Strongly disagree
                          5%
  Above table shows that10 % percent (n=4) respondent with strongly agree,
50%percent (n=20) respondent with agree, 5%percent (n=2) respondent with
uncertain20% percent (n=8) respondent with disagree, 15% percent (n=6)
respondents with strongly disagree
Table no 5.27 Table shows leadership also influences the level of motivation
Agree 17 42.5%
Uncertain 3 7.5%
                                            76
                           Disagree               15                 37.5%
Strongly disagree 2 5%
Total 40 100%
5% 8%
                                                                      Strongly agree
                                                                      Agree
                     38%                                              Uncertain
                                            42%                       Disagree
                                                                      Strongly disagree
7%
  Above table shows that7 % percent (n=3) respondent with strongly agree,
42%percent (n=17) respondent with agree, 8%percent (n=2) respondent with
                                           77
uncertain38% percent (n=8) respondent with disagree, 5% percent (n=2)
respondents with strongly disagree
                                                      78
         Majority of respondent 62.5% (n=25) agree and 25% (n=10) strongly agree
      for management of our calls for active participation of the employee in the day
      to day functions of the organization
         Most of respondent 42.5% (n=17) were agree and 37.5% (n=15) for
      disagree leadership also influences the level of motivation.
     In the Madhur dray employees feel that the salary structure is very good
      but give amount is not satisfactory. 55%of the employees are satisfied by
      their salary and increment, financial reward. as it is very low rate
       The higher numbers of employees have given positive response but still
        there is scope for improvement.
       The HR department should make the job more challenging. Exciting and
        meaningful by the factor like goal setting. Creative work. Job rotation.
        Skill diversity.
3.3 CONCLUSION
Motivation is an aspect which covers almost all the employee from the managing
directors to his peon. The motivation is a live issue for all.
                                             80
Motivation is psychological concept. Motivation is not a cause but rather the effect or
result of many going awry. Motivation drifters from person to person, industry to
industry, level of education age, nature of work etc. Motivation may be range from very
high to very low.
By this study it is clear that various faction which influences motivation and
productivity of the employees each as Social Security measures, welfare facilities,
salary status, Bonus, heath condition, shift system and recognition of work are getting
much importance.
Several approaches to motivation are available. Early theories are too simplistic in their
approach towards motivation. The content theories. Maslo w’s need hierarchy.
Herzberg’s two-factor model and alder’s erg approach are very popular
From the financial and nonfinancial reward system make motivation in complete
picture. Form this we learn that how we applied the concept of motivation for
the progressive result of company
                                           81
                        CHAPTER 4
APPENDICES
4.1Questionnaire
    (1
     ) Name:
    (2
     ) Sex:  male [ ] female [ ]
   (3)Age:
   (4)Designation:
   (5)Education:
      a. Ssc            [ ]
      b. Hsc            [ ]
      c. Graduate       [ ]
      d. Post graduate [   ]
      e. Other:         [ ]
                                     82
   (7) I am satisfied with the present salary and increment given to me.
           1) Strongly agree      [ ]
           2) Agree               [ ]
           3) Uncertain               [ ]
           4) Disagree            [ ]
              Strongly
           5) disagree            [ ]
           1) Strongly agree      [                ]
           2) Agree               [                ]
           3) Uncertain           [                ]
           4) Disagree            [                ]
           5) Strongly disagree [                  ]
                                          83
    (11) I am aware with policies and procedures to the company and
I find that satisfactory.
            1) Strongly agree      [    ]
            2) Agree               [ ]
            3) Uncertain           [ ]
            4) Disagree            [ ]
            5) Strongly disagree   [ ]
            1) Strongly agree      [     ]
            2) Agree                   [ ]
            3) Uncertain               [ ]
            4) Disagree                [ ]
            5) Strongly disagree       [ ]
(13) Supervisors take interest in our problem, well being and feature.
            1) Strongly agree      [    ]
            2) Agree               [ ]
            3) Uncertain           [ ]
            4) Disagree            [ ]
            5) Strongly disagree   [ ]
            1) Strongly agree      [        ]
            2) Agree               [        ]
            3) Uncertain           [        ]
            4) Disagree            [        ]
                                   84
          5) Strongly disagree     [     ]
          1) Strongly agree         [    ]
          2) Agree                     [ ]
          3) Uncertain                 [ ]
          4) Disagree                  [ ]
          5) Strongly disagree      [    ]
          1) Strongly agree        [    ]
          2) Agree                 [ ]
          3) Uncertain              [ ]
          4) Disagree              [ ]
          5) Strongly disagree     [    ]
  (17) I feel that my job has enough learning opportunities which will
help me in career advancement.
          1) Strongly agree        [    ]
          2) Agree                 [ ]
          3) Uncertain             [ ]
          4) Disagree              [ ]
          5) Strongly disagree      [ ]
          1) Strongly agree        [ ]
          2) Agree                 [ ]
          3) Uncertain             [ ]
                                   85
           4) Disagree             [ ]
           5) Strongly disagree   [    ]
           1) Strongly agree       [   ]
           2) Agree                [ ]
           3) Uncertain            [ ]
           4) Disagree             [ ]
           5) Strongly disagree    [ ]
           1) Strongly agree       [ ]
           2) Agree                [ ]
           3) Uncertain            [ ]
           4) Disagree             [ ]
           5) Strongly disagree   [    ]
           1) Strongly agree       [   ]
           2) Agree                [ ]
           3) Uncertain            [ ]
           4) Disagree             [ ]
           5) Strongly disagree   [    ]
            1) Strongly agree       [   ]
            2) Agree                [ ]
            3) Uncertain            [ ]
            4) Disagree             [ ]
            5) Strongly disagree    [ ]
            1) Strongly agree       [ ]
            2) Agree                [ ]
            3) Uncertain            [ ]
            4) Disagree             [ ]
            5) Strongly disagree    [   ]
            1) Strongly agree       [ ]
            2) Agree                [ ]
            3) Uncertain            [ ]
            4) Disagree             [ ]
            5) Strongly disagree    [   ]
           1) Strongly agree        [          ]
           2) Agree                    [       ]
           3) Uncertain                [       ]
           4) Disagree                  [ ]
           5) Strongly disagree        [       ]
           1) Strongly agree       [ ]
           2) Agree                [ ]
           3) Uncertain            [ ]
           4) Disagree             [ ]
           5) Strongly disagree    [       ]
           1) Strongly agree       [ ]
           2) Agree                [ ]
           3) Uncertain            [ ]
           4) Disagree             [ ]
           5) Strongly disagree    [       ]
                                   88
4.2 REFERENCES