Anticancer Drug Classification Guide
Anticancer Drug Classification Guide
net/publication/9035256
CITATIONS READS
65 16,035
4 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Enrique Espinosa on 23 September 2017.
ANTI-TUMOUR TREATMENT
The arrival of a great number of new antineoplastic agents has made it necessary to reclassify all of them. Anticancer drugs
may act at different levels: cancer cells, endothelium, extracellular matrix, the immune system or host cells. The tumour cell
can be targeted at the DNA, RNA or protein level. Most classical chemotherapeutic agents interact with tumour DNA,
whereas monoclonal antibodies and small molecules are directed against proteins. The endothelium and extracellular matrix
may be affected also by specific antibodies and small molecules.
C 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Key words: Antineoplastic drugs; chemotherapy; classification; monoclonal antibodies; new drugs; small molecules.
0305-7372/$ - see front matter C 2003 ELSEVIER LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
516 E. ESPINOSA ET AL.
Target
Tumour DNA Non-specific
DNA break: chemotherapy
DNA-related proteins: chemotherapy
Specific
Hormonal therapy, retinoids
Interferon a
Gene therapy
RNA Antisense oligonucleotides
Proteins Membrane receptors
Extracellular domain: MoAb
Intracellular domain: small molecules
Cytoplasm
Intracellular pathways: small molecules
Tubulin: chemotherapy
DNA-related proteins
Antibiotics Anthracyclines: doxorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, mitoxantrone Free radicals & £ Topo II
Podophillotoxins Etoposide £ Topo II
Topo I inhibitors Topotecan, irinotecan, rubitecan £ Topo I
Antimetabolites Antifolates: methotrexate, trimetrexate £ DHFR & other enzymes
Fluoropyrimidines (5FU, ftorafur, capecitabine) and raltitrexed £ TS
Pemetrexed £ DHFR, TS, FTRG
Cytarabine, fludarabine £ DNA polymerase & RR
Gemcitabine £ RR
Adenosine analogs: deoxycoformycin, cladribine £ Adenosine-deaminase
Other Ecteinascidin £ Transcription factors
Topo, topoisomerase; DHFR, dihydrofolic reductase; TS, thymidilate synthase; FTRG, formyltransferase ribonucleotide glycinamide;
RR, ribonucleotide reductase; £, inhibition.
Topoisomerase I transiently breaks a single strand specific genes does not mean that this activity is re-
of DNA during DNA replication, thereby reducing stricted to tumour cells.
torsional strain. Inhibitors of this enzyme derive Gene therapy also targets specific genes, but in
from camptothecin. This family has grown rapidly this case the mechanism of action differs substan-
in recent years. In addition to topotecan and irino- tially from that of the hormones. Genes are intro-
tecan, new experimental agents could join the family duced in vectors to either repair or block specific
in the near future, for instance rubitecan (7,8), lur- DNA sequences.
totecan (9,10) or exatecan (11,12).
On the other hand, antimetabolites interfere with
enzymes that contribute to DNA synthesis. In this
group we have antifolates, fluoropyrimidines, ral-
DRUGS DIRECTED AGAINST TUMOUR RNA
titrexed, cytarabine, gemcitabine, and adenosine
analogs (fludarabine, pentostatin, cladribine). A number of anticancer drugs such as the fluoro-
Pemetrexed has recently been incorporated to the pyrimidines and platinum compounds interfere
clinic. This drug shows activity in non-small cell with RNA synthesis. However, they mainly act by
lung cancer, breast cancer, mesothelioma and head binding to DNA. The major representatives in this
and neck tumours (13–15). Table 3a indicates the group are antisense oligonucleotides. These mole-
target enzyme for each antimetabolite. cules are directed against specific mRNAs. The
A marine derivative, ecteinascidin or ET-743, has mRNAs of bcl-2, myb, p53, mdm2, Her-2 and
a unique mechanism of action. Formerly thought to methyltransferase-1 have been targeted with these
be an alkylator, recent investigations have shown oligonucleotides (19–25). The synthesis of antisense
that it blocks transcriptional factors—such as TC- oligonucleotides is complex and improved methods
NER or Sp1—and seems to affect RNA polymerase to deliver the compound in the target are needed
II-mediated gene transcription (16). Ecteinascidin (25–27). These problems are delaying the develop-
has been used in patients with refractory sarcomas ment of antisense therapy. Another drug in this
(17). group is angiozyme, which blocks the mRNA of the
vascular endothelial growth factor (28,29).
Specific genes
DRUGS DIRECTED AGAINST PROTEINS IN
The classical representatives in this group are hor- THE TUMOUR CELL
monal agents. Steroids, antihormones and retinoids
share a common mechanism of action because they In the last decade, a great number of compounds
modify the expression of specific genes (Table 3b). have joined this group, mainly monoclonal anti-
Steroid hormones, such as glucocorticoids, bind to bodies and small molecules. They are all very spe-
receptor proteins in the cytoplasm or nucleus to cific and their effect is cytostatic rather than
form a hormone–receptor complex. This complex cytotoxic. They can bind to membrane receptors or
has the capacity to activate regulatory sequences in cytoplasmic proteins.
DNA. Antioestrogens and antiandrogens block re-
ceptors of oestrogens and androgens, respectively.
These receptors are ligand-regulated transcription
factors located in the nucleus. The antiaromatase Receptors in the tumour membrane
agents anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane act in
the cytoplasm, mainly in tumour cells but also in Two groups may be distinguished: monoclonal an-
peripheral tissues. tibodies and small molecules. The former block the
LH–RH analogs bind to a specific membrane re- extracellular domain of the receptor, whereas the
ceptor linked to a G protein in the hypothalamus. latter cross the membrane and inhibit the intracel-
However, the ultimate effect takes place in the tu- lular domain, usually a tyrosin-kinase (Table 4). The
mour cell, and for this reason the analogs should be term ‘‘small molecule’’ may be misleading, because
grouped together with the other hormones (Table 2). classical chemotherapy compounds are also small in
The antitumour activity of interferon a appears to size, but it allows the distinction with monoclonal
be due to a combination of direct antiproliferative as antibodies.
well as indirect immune-mediated effects. It has also The first antitumour antibodies were directed
antiangiogenic effects mediated through interferon against lymphoid antigens, such as CD20 and CD52.
gamma (18). Thus, this drug may appear in several Some of them combine the antibody with an isotope
groups in our classification. Activity over some to increase efficacy (30–34). These highly active
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTICANCER DRUGS 519
R115,777 (49,50). There are also inhibitors of raf TA B L E 6 Drugs directed against the endothelium and the
(BAY 43-9006) and MEK (CI-1040) (51,52). extracellular matrix
The phosphatidyl-inositol pathway starts with the Endothelial growth factors
serin threonine PI-3K, which is connected with Thalidomide £ VEGF, bFGF, TGF-a
mTOR through PKB/Akt. MTOR controls apoptosis Carboxiamide-triazol (CAI) £ Synthesis of VEGF
and is related to the balance between cellular ca-
Receptors of endothelial cells
tabolism and anabolism. Specific drugs in this Bevacizumab Anti VEGFR
pathway are rapamycin derivatives such as CCI-779, SU-5416, SU-6668, endostatin £ Tyrosin-kinase of VEGFR
which inhibits mTOR (53). PI-3K is also connected
with protein-kinase C, a family of enzymes that ac- Extracellular matrix
Marimastat, AG-3340 £ Metalloproteinases
tivate the transcription factor NF-jB. Protein-kinase
(prinomastat), AE-941
C is inhibited by bryostatin (54,55) and PKC-412 (56).
(Neovastat)
The proteasome—a group of enzymes that de- Vitaxin Anti integrin
grade proteins—is inhibited by PS-341 (57,58). On ABT-510 Mimetic of thrombospondin
the other hand, the chaperones exert the opposite
function, i.e., they protect proteins from degrada-
tion. Geldanamycin derivatives such as 17-AAG in-
crease the degradation of one of the main Endothelium
chaperones, heat shock protein 90 (59,60).
Finally, flavopiridol and CYC-202 (a roscovitine The main endothelial growth factors—vascular en-
derivative) inhibit cyclin-dependent kinases (61,62). dothelial growth factor (VEGF)and basic fibroblast
The staurosporin compound UCN-01 inhibits CDK-2 growth factor (bFGF)—are inhibited by thalido-
selectively (63,64). mide (68,69). Another inhibitor specific for VEGF is
carboxyamido-triazole (70,71). Interferon a also re-
duces VEGF synthesis in tumour cells, but this effect
seems to be mediated through interferon gamma
Tubulin
(18,72,73). Cyclo-oxygenase 2 may stimulate endo-
thelial growth, hence one of the possible mecha-
Tubulin contributes to the maintenance of cell shape, nisms of action of COX-2 inhibitors (74,75).
intracellular transport and mitosis, so drugs inter- With regard to VEGF receptors, the monoclonal
fering with tubulin are grouped here in the present antibody bevacizumab binds to all of these receptors
classification. The vinca alkaloids bind to specific (70,76,77). SU-5416 is a small molecule binding to the
sites on tubulin and prevent polymerization of tu- tyrosine kinase of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 (70,78). It
bulin dimers, thereby disrupting the formation of also binds to platelet derived growth factor receptor
microtubules. The taxanes have a different binding and c-kit. Clinical trials with SU-5416 in haemato-
site and stabilize microtubules: this unusual stability logical malignancies and colorectal cancer have been
inhibits the normal reorganization of the microtu- initiated. Another small molecule, SU-6668, binds to
bule network. Oral formulations of taxanes will VEGFR, bFGFR and platelet derived growth factor
improve convenience if they prove to be as active as receptor (PDGFR) (79,80).
the parent drugs (65). The epothilones are a new Finally, combretastatin inhibits the mitotic spin-
group of tubulin-stabilizing agents. Preclinical dle in the endothelium and induces apoptosis
studies have shown promising activity of these (81,82).
compounds, but the results of phase II and III clin-
ical trials are not still available (66,67). Table 5B
shows all these drugs. Extracellular matrix
Apart from MMPs, other elements of the extra- 7. Giovanella BC, Stehlin JS, Hinz HR, Kozielski AJ, Harris NJ,
cellular matrix could be targeted as a form of anti- Vardeman DM. Preclinical evaluation of the anticancer
cancer therapy, for instance, integrin, endothelin and activity and toxicity of 9-nitro-20(S)-camptothecin
(Rubitecan). Int J Oncol 2002; 20(1): 81–88.
thrombospondin (Table 6) (89,90). 8. Schoffski P, Herr A, Vermorken JB, Van den Brande J, Beijnen
JH, Rosing H, et al. Clinical phase II study and
pharmacological evaluation of rubitecan in non-pretreated
patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-significant effect of
HOST CELL INHIBITORS AND OTHER DRUGS food intake on the bioavailability of the oral camptothecin
analogue. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38(6): 807–813.
9. Emerson DL, Bendele R, Brown E, Chiang S, Desjardins JP,
Some drugs are directed to organs that may harbour
Dihel LC, et al. Antitumor efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and
tumour cells. At present, these only relate to agents biodistribution of NX 211: a low-clearance liposomal
that inhibit bone cell function and the bone micro- formulation of lurtotecan. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(7):
environment, such as bisphosphonates (91,92), os- 2903–2912.
teoprotogerin (93) and PTHRP antibodies. In the 10. Kehrer DF, Bos AM, Verweij J, Groen HJ, Loos WJ,
Sparreboom A, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of
future, more drugs could be developed to target
liposomal lurtotecan, NX 211: urinary excretion predicts
other organs at risk of metastasis. hematologic toxicity. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(5): 1222–1231.
Finally, cytokines such as interferon and inter- 11. Giles FJ, Cortes JE, Thomas DA, Garcia-Manero G, Faderl S,
leukin 2 enhance the antitumour activity of the im- Jeha S, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DX-8951f
mune system and are already well known. (exatecan mesylate), a hexacyclic camptothecin, on a daily-
times-five schedule in patients with advanced leukemia. Clin
Cancer Res 2002; 8(7): 2134–2141.
12. Minami H, Fujii H, Igarashi T, Itoh K, Tamanoi K, Oguma T,
et al. Phase I and pharmacological study of a new
CONCLUSIONS camptothecin derivative, exatecan mesylate (DX-8951f),
infused over 30 min every three weeks. Clin Cancer Res 2001;
A great number of anticancer agents are under 7(10): 3056–3064.
clinical investigation at this moment. Some of them 13. Calvert H, Bunn Jr PA. Future directions in the development
of pemetrexed. Semin Oncol 2002; 29(2 Suppl 5): 54–61.
belong to classic groups of chemotherapy, but others
14. Novello S, le Chevalier T. ALIMTA (pemetrexed disodium,
are the first of new families of drugs. For clinicians, it LY231514, MTA): clinical experience in non-small cell lung
is important to have the main groups in mind and, cancer. Lung Cancer 2001; 34(Suppl 4): S107–S109.
for this reason, we propose a classification that is 15. Pivot X, Raymond E, Laguerre B, Degardin M, Cals L,
based on the target. The target may be located in the Armand JP, et al. Pemetrexed disodium in recurrent locally
advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head
tumour cell or in other elements that interact with
and neck. Br J Cancer 2001; 85(5): 649–655.
the tumour cells (endothelium, extracellular matrix, 16. Scotto KW. ET-743: more than an innovative mechanism of
immune system, host cells). We hope that this clas- action. Anticancer Drugs 2002; 13(Suppl 1): S3–S6.
sification will be able to incorporate new drugs 17. Delaloge S, Yovine A, Taamma A, Riofrio M, Brain E,
coming up in the next years. Raymond E, et al. Ecteinascidin-743: a marine-derived
compound in advanced, pretreated sarcoma patients—
preliminary evidence of activity. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(5):
1248–1255.
18. Jonasch E, Haluska FG. Interferon in oncological practice:
REFERENCES review of interferon biology, clinical applications, and
toxicities. Oncologist 2001; 6(1): 34–55.
1. Hurley LH. DNA and its associated processes as targets for 19. Tolcher AW. Preliminary phase I results of G3139 (bcl-2
cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2(3): 188–200. antisense oligonucleotide) therapy in combination with
2. Bremer K. High rates of long-lasting remissions after 5-day docetaxel in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Semin
bendamustine chemotherapy cycles in pre-treated low-grade Oncol 2001; 28(4 Suppl 15): 67–70.
non-Hodgkin’s-lymphomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2002; 20. Del Bufalo D, Cucco C, Leonetti C, Citro G, D’Agnano I,
128(11): 603–609. Benassi M, et al. Effect of cisplatin and c-myb antisense
3. Aivado M, Schulte K, Henze L, Burger J, Finke J, Haas R. phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotides combination on a
Bendamustine in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic human colon carcinoma cell line in vitro and in vivo. Br J
leukemia: results and future perspectives. Semin Oncol 2002; Cancer 1996; 74(3): 387–393.
29(4 Suppl 13): 19–22. 21. Strasberg Rieber M, Zangemeister-Wittke U, Rieber M. p53-
4. Weidmann E, Kim SZ, Rost A, Schuppert H, Seipelt G, Independent induction of apoptosis in human melanoma
Hoelzer D, et al. Bendamustine is effective in relapsed or cells by a bcl-2/bcl-xL bispecific antisense oligonucleotide.
refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7(5): 1446–1451.
2002; 13(8): 1285–1289. 22. Wang H, Nan L, Yu D, Lindsey JR, Agrawal S, Zhang R. Anti-
5. Gandara DR, Lara Jr PN, Goldberg Z, Le QT, Mack PC, Lau tumor efficacy of a novel antisense anti-MDM2 mixed-
DH, et al. Tirapazamine: prototype for a novel class of backbone oligonucleotide in human colon cancer models:
therapeutic agents targeting tumor hypoxia. Semin Oncol p53-dependent and p53-independent mechanisms. Mol Med
2002; 29(1 Suppl 4): 102–109. 2002; 8(4): 185–199.
6. Peters KB, Brown JM. Tirapazamine: a hypoxia-activated 23. Rait AS, Pirollo KF, Rait V, Krygier JE, Xiang L, Chang EH.
topoisomerase II poison. Cancer Res 2002; 62(18): 5248–5253. Inhibitory effects of the combination of HER-2 antisense
522 E. ESPINOSA ET AL.
oligonucleotide and chemotherapeutic agents used for the metastatic breast cancer patients immunized with a synthetic
treatment of human breast cancer. Cancer Gene Ther 2001; MUC1 peptide. Int J Cancer 1998; 76(6): 817–823.
8(10): 728–739. 42. Herbst RS, Kies MS. ZD1839 (Iressa) in non-small cell lung
24. Funato T, Kozawa K, Fujimaki S, Miura T, Kaku M. Increased cancer. Oncologist 2002; 7(Suppl 4): 9–15.
sensitivity to cisplatin in gastric cancer by antisense inhibition 43. Ranson M. ZD1839 (Iressa): for more than just non-small cell
of the her-2/neu (c-erbB-2) gene. Chemotherapy 2001; 47(4): lung cancer. Oncologist 2002; 7(Suppl 4): 16–24.
297–303. 44. Hidalgo M, Siu LL, Nemunaitis J, Rizzo J, Hammond LA,
25. Goffin J, Eisenhauer E. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors- Takimoto C, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of OSI-
state of the art. Ann Oncol 2002; 13(11): 1699–1716. 774, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase
26. Henry SP, Geary RS, Yu R, Levin AA. Drug properties of inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin
second-generation antisense oligonucleotides: how do they Oncol 2001; 19(13): 3267–3279.
measure up to their predecessors? Curr Opin Investig Drugs 45. Baker CH, Kedar D, McCarty MF, Tsan R, Weber KL, Bucana
2001; 2(10): 1444–1449. CD, et al. Blockade of epidermal growth factor receptor
27. Jansen B, Zangemeister-Wittke U. Antisense therapy for signaling on tumor cells and tumor-associated endothelial
cancer—the time of truth. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3(11): 672–683. cells for therapy of human carcinomas. Am J Pathol 2002;
28. Sandberg JA, Parker VP, Blanchard KS, Sweedler D, Powell 161(3): 929–938.
JA, Kachensky A, et al. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of 46. Allen LF, Lenehan PF, Eiseman IA, Elliott WL, Fry DW.
an antiangiogenic ribozyme (ANGIOZYME) in healthy Potential benefits of the irreversible pan-erbB inhibitor, CI-
volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol 2000; 40(12 Pt 2): 1462–1469. 1033, in the treatment of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2002; 29(3
29. Weng DE, Usman N. Angiozyme: a novel angiogenesis Suppl 11): 11–21.
inhibitor. Curr Oncol Rep 2001; 3(2): 141–146. 47. Cohen MH, Moses ML, Pazdur R. Gleevec for the treatment
30. Davis TA, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA, McLaughlin P, of chronic myelogenous leukemia: US. Food and Drug
Czuczman MS, Link BK, et al. Rituximab anti-CD20 Administration regulatory mechanisms, accelerated
monoclonal antibody therapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: approval, and orphan drug status. Oncologist 2002; 7(5):
safety and efficacy of re-treatment. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(17): 390–392.
3135–3143. 48. Joensuu H, Fletcher C, Dimitrijevic S, Silberman S, Roberts P,
31. Vose JM, Wahl RL, Saleh M, Rohatiner AZ, Knox SJ, Radford Demetri G. Management of malignant gastrointestinal
JA, et al. Multicenter phase II study of iodine-131 stromal tumours. Lancet Oncol 2002; 3(11): 655–664.
tositumomab for chemotherapy-relapsed/refractory low- 49. Hoover RR, Mahon FX, Melo JV, Daley GQ. Overcoming
grade and transformed low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin’s STI571 resistance with the farnesyl transferase inhibitor
lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(6): 1316–1323. SCH66336. Blood 2002; 100(3): 1068–1071.
32. Iodine-131 tositumomab (Bexxar) in relapsed/refractory non- 50. Karp JE, Kaufmann SH, Adjei AA, Lancet JE, Wright JJ, End
Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Update from the 2001 American DW. Current status of clinical trials of farnesyltransferase
Society of Hematology Meeting. Clin Lymphoma 2002; 2(4): inhibitors. Curr Opin Oncol 2001; 13(6): 470–476.
209–211. 51. Hotte SJ, Hirte HW. BAY 43-9006: early clinical data in
33. Rai KR, Freter CE, Mercier RJ, Cooper MR, Mitchell BS, patients with advanced solid malignancies. Curr Pharm Des
Stadtmauer EA, et al. Alemtuzumab in previously treated 2002; 8(25): 2249–2253.
chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients who also had received 52. Dancey JE. Agents targeting ras signaling pathway. Curr
fludarabine. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(18): 3891–3897. Pharm Des 2002; 8(25): 2259–2267.
34. Lundin J, Kimby E, Bjorkholm M, Broliden PA, Celsing F, 53. Elit L. CCI-779 Wyeth. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2002; 3(8):
Hjalmar V, et al. Phase II trial of subcutaneous anti-CD52 1249–1253.
monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) as first- 54. Brockstein B, Samuels B, Humerickhouse R, Arietta R, Fishkin
line treatment for patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic P, Wade J, et al. Phase II studies of bryostatin-1 in patients
leukemia (B-CLL). Blood 2002; 100(3): 768–773. with advanced sarcoma and advanced head and neck cancer.
35. Roboz GJ, Knovich MA, Bayer RL, Schuster MW, Seiter K, Invest New Drugs 2001; 19(3): 249–254.
Powell BL, et al. Efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab 55. Pfister DG, McCaffrey J, Zahalsky AJ, Schwartz GK, Lis E,
ozogamicin in patients with poor-prognosis acute myeloid Gerald W, et al. A phase II trial of bryostatin-1 in patients with
leukemia. Leukemia Lymphoma 2002; 43(10): 1951–1955. metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head
36. Larson RA, Boogaerts M, Estey E, Karanes C, Stadtmauer EA, and neck. Invest New Drugs 2002; 20(1): 123–127.
Sievers EL, et al. Antibody-targeted chemotherapy of older 56. Virchis A, Ganeshaguru K, Hart S, Jones D, Fletcher L, Wright
patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first relapse using F, et al. A novel treatment approach for low grade
Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Leukemia 2002; 16(9): lymphoproliferative disorders using PKC412 (CGP41251),
1627–1636. an inhibitor of protein kinase C. Hematol J 2002; 3(3): 131–136.
37. Ligibel JA, Winer EP. Trastuzumab/chemotherapy 57. Adams J. Preclinical and clinical evaluation of proteasome
combinations in metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 2002; inhibitor PS-341 for the treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Chem
29(3 Suppl 11): 38–43. Biol 2002; 6(4): 493–500.
38. McKeage K, Perry CM. Trastuzumab: a review of its use in 58. Orlowski R, Stinchcombe E, Mitchell B, Shea T, Baldwin A,
the treatment of metastatic breast cancer overexpressing Stahl S, et al. Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341
HER2. Drugs 2002; 62(1): 209–243. in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies. J Clin
39. Baselga J. The EGFR as a target for anticancer therapy—focus Oncol 2002; 20(22): 4420–4427.
on cetuximab. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(Suppl 4): S16–S22. 59. Neckers L, Schulte TW, Mimnaugh E. Geldanamycin as a
40. Robert F, Ezekiel MP, Spencer SA, Meredith RF, Bonner JA, potential anti-cancer agent: its molecular target and
Khazaeli MB, et al. Phase I study of anti-epidermal growth biochemical activity. Invest New Drugs 1999; 17(4): 361–373.
factor receptor antibody cetuximab in combination with 60. Nimmanapalli R, O’Bryan E, Bhalla K. Geldanamycin and its
radiation therapy in patients with advanced head and neck analogue 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin lowers
cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(13): 3234–3243. Bcr-Abl levels and induces apoptosis and differentiation of
41. Reddish M, MacLean GD, Koganty RR, Kan-Mitchell J, Jones Bcr-Abl-positive human leukemic blasts. Cancer Res 2001;
V, Mitchell MS, et al. Anti-MUC1 class I restricted CTLs in 61(5): 1799–1804.
CLASSIFICATION OF ANTICANCER DRUGS 523
61. Schwartz GK, O’Reilly E, Ilson D, Saltz L, Sharma S, Tong W, monoclonal antibody bevacizumab. Oncology (Huntingt) 2001;
et al. Phase I study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 15(8): 1017, 1020, 1023–1026.
flavopiridol in combination with paclitaxel in patients with 78. Stopeck A, Sheldon M, Vahedian M, Cropp G, Gosalia R,
advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(8): 2157–2170. Hannah A. Results of a Phase I dose-escalating study of the
62. McClue SJ, Blake D, Clarke R, Cowan A, Cummings L, antiangiogenic agent, SU5416, in patients with advanced
Fischer PM, et al. In vitro and in vivo antitumor properties of malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8(9): 2798–2805.
the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor CYC202 (R-roscovitine). 79. Fabbro D, Manley P. Su-6668. SUGEN. Curr Opin Investig
Int J Cancer 2002; 102(5): 463–468. Drugs 2001; 2: 1142–1148.
63. Koh J, Kubota T, Migita T, Abe S, Hashimoto M, Hosoda Y, et 80. Hoekman K. SU6668, a multitargeted angiogenesis inhibitor.
al. UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine) inhibits the growth of Cancer J 2001; 7(Suppl 3): S134–S138.
human breast cancer xenografts through disruption of signal 81. Dowlati A, Robertson K, Cooney M, Petros WP, Stratford M,
transduction. Breast Cancer 2002; 9(1): 50–54. Jesberger J, et al. A phase I pharmacokinetic and translational
64. Senderowicz AM. The cell cycle as a target for cancer therapy: study of the novel vascular targeting agent combretastatin a-4
basic and clinical findings with the small molecule inhibitors phosphate on a single-dose intravenous schedule in patients
flavopiridol and UCN-01. Oncologist 2002; 7(Suppl 3): 12–19. with advanced cancer. Cancer Res 2002; 62(12): 3408–3416.
65. Rose WC, Long BH, Fairchild CR, Lee FY, Kadow JF. 82. Ohno T, Kawano K, Sasaki A, Aramaki M, Tahara K, Etoh T,
Preclinical pharmacology of BMS-275183, an orally active et al. Antitumor and antivascular effects of AC-7700, a
taxane. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7(7): 2016–2021. combretastatin A-4 derivative, against rat liver cancer. Int J
66. Lee FY, Borzilleri R, Fairchild CR, Kim SH, Long BH, Clin Oncol 2002; 7(3): 171–176.
Reventos-Suarez C, et al. BMS-247550: a novel epothilone 83. Hoekstra R, Eskens FA, Verweij J. Matrix metalloproteinase
analog with a mode of action similar to paclitaxel but inhibitors: current developments and future perspectives.
possessing superior antitumor efficacy. Clin Cancer Res 2001; Oncologist 2001; 6(5): 415–427.
7(5): 1429–1437. 84. Bramhall SR, Hallissey MT, Whiting J, Scholefield J, Tierney
67. Stachel SJ, Biswas K, Danishefsky SJ. The epothilones, G, Stuart RC, et al. Marimastat as maintenance therapy for
eleutherobins, and related types of molecules. Curr Pharm patients with advanced gastric cancer: a randomised trial. Br J
Des 2001; 7(13): 1277–1290. Cancer 2002; 86(12): 1864–1870.
68. Neben K, Moehler T, Egerer G, Kraemer A, Hillengass J, 85. Bramhall SR, Schulz J, Nemunaitis J, Brown PD, Baillet M,
Benner A, et al. High plasma basic fibroblast growth factor Buckels JA. A double-blind placebo-controlled, randomised
concentration is associated with response to thalidomide in study comparing gemcitabine and marimastat with
progressive multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7(9): gemcitabine and placebo as first line therapy in patients
2675–2681. with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2002; 87(2):
69. Raje N, Anderson KC. Thalidomide and immunomodulatory 161–167.
drugs as cancer therapy. Curr Opin Oncol 2002; 14(6): 635–640. 86. Groves MD, Puduvalli VK, Hess KR, Jaeckle KA, Peterson P,
70. Figg WD, Kruger EA, Price DK, Kim S, Dahut WD. Inhibition Yung WK, et al. Phase II trial of temozolomide plus the matrix
of angiogenesis: treatment options for patients with metalloproteinase inhibitor, marimastat, in recurrent and
metastatic prostate cancer. Invest New Drugs 2002; 20(2): progressive glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(5):
183–194. 1383–1388.
71. Waselenko JK, Shinn CA, Willis CR, Flinn IW, Grever MR, 87. Batist G, Patenaude F, Champagne P, Croteau D, Levinton C,
Byrd JC. Carboxyamido-triazole (CAI)—a novel ‘‘static’’ Hariton C, et al. Neovastat (AE-941) in refractory renal cell
signal transduction inhibitor induces apoptosis in human B- carcinoma patients: report of a phase II trial with two dose
cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Leukemia Lymphoma levels. Ann Oncol 2002; 13(8): 1259–1263.
2001; 42(5): 1049–1053. 88. Falardeau P, Champagne P, Poyet P, Hariton C, Dupont E.
72. Dreau D, Foster M, Hogg M, Swiggett J, Holder WD, White Neovastat, a naturally occurring multifunctional
RL. Angiogenic and immune parameters during recombinant antiangiogenic drug, in phase III clinical trials. Semin Oncol
interferon-a2b adjuvant treatment in patients with melanoma. 2001; 28(6): 620–625.
Oncol Res 2000; 12(5): 241–251. 89. Gutheil JC, Campbell TN, Pierce PR, Watkins JD, Huse WD,
73. Kawano Y, Matsui N, Kamihigashi S, Narahara H, Miyakawa Bodkin DJ, et al. Targeted antiangiogenic therapy for cancer
I. Effects of interferon-gamma on secretion of vascular using Vitaxin: a humanized monoclonal antibody to the
endothelial growth factor by endometrial stromal cells. Am J integrin avb3. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6(8): 3056–3061.
Reprod Immunol 2000; 43(1): 47–52. 90. Patel SR, Jenkins J, Papadopolous N, Burgess MA, Plager C,
74. Leahy KM, Ornberg RL, Wang Y, Zweifel BS, Koki AT, Gutterman J, et al. Pilot study of vitaxin—an angiogenesis
Masferrer JL. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition by celecoxib inhibitor—in patients with advanced leiomyosarcomas.
reduces proliferation and induces apoptosis in angiogenic Cancer 2001; 92(5): 1347–1348.
endothelial cells in vivo. Cancer Res 2002; 62(3): 625–631. 91. Coleman RE. Treatment of skeletal complications of cancer
75. Wang Z, Fuentes CF, Shapshay SM. Antiangiogenic and with zoledronic acid. Semin Oncol 2002; 29(Suppl 21): 1–49.
chemopreventive activities of celecoxib in oral carcinoma cell. 92. Body JJ, Mancini I. Bisphosphonates for cancer patients: why,
Laryngoscope 2002; 112(5): 839–843. how, and when? Support Care Cancer 2002; 10: 399–407.
76. Bevacizumab. Anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, avastin, 93. Body JJ, Greip P, Coleman RE, et al. A phase I study of
rhumab-VEGF. Drugs R D 2002; 3(1): 28–30. AMGN-0007, a recombinant osteoprotegerin construct, in
77. Chen HX, Gore-Langton RE, Cheson BD. Clinical trials patients with multiple myeloma or breast carcinoma related
referral resource: Current clinical trials of the anti-VEGF bone metastases. Cancer 2003; 97(Suppl 3): 887–892.