Some of the employees found it really difficult to cope up with the radical changes.
(p7, pr3)
After any improvement program the plant would flip back to its old levels of performance quickly.
(p7, pr2)
Unions showed consistence resistance to the proposed new working practice.(p6 pr4)
Ford’s priorities were in contradiction with jaguar’s priorities (p5, pr6)
The plant was rewarded for cost saving efforts instead of quality performance
Four key weaknesses were identified during cross function study i.e. quality, productivity,
infrastructure, culture (p5 pr4)
The workforce was considered militant, skeptical and held a collective distrust, nurtured by lack of
coherent leadership and unkept promises. (p3 pr4)
The support system lacked customer focus and drove people away from dealing with customer
satisfaction issues. (p pr2)
There was a widespread and genuine belief that there was no requirement for change or
improvement as the plant had produced the number one UK selling car for year. (p3 pr1)
Helewood was renowned for its troubled industrial relationship, shop floor militancy. The plant beat
all records in terms of no of strikes between 1978-82. (p1, pr4)
Communication barrier.
The relationship between the management and the workforce was characterized by them and us
attitude. Behavioural issues eg: militant attitude was very prominent which was nurtured by lack of
coherent leadership and unkept promises. Communication barrier was also evident which failed in
building the minimum level of trust and credibility between employees and leadership because of
which employees found it very difficult to cope up with the radical changes.
Contradiction in priorities
No reward for quality performance
No focus on customer satisfaction
Flipping back to old levels of performance